Ocn808106889.Pdf (1.557Mb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ocn808106889.Pdf (1.557Mb) MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF COASTAL E ZONE MANAGEMENT D MASSACHUSETTS I OFFICE OF COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT U MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF COASTAL G ZONE MANAGEMENT MASSACHUSETTS Y OFFICE OF COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT C I MASSACHUSETTS L OFFICE OF COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 O 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 P 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Policy Guide October 2011 Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management 251 Causeway Street, Suite 800 Boston, MA 02114-2136 (617) 626-1200 CZM Information Line - (617) 626-1212 CZM Website - www.mass.gov/czm Commonwealth of Massachusetts Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lieutenant Governor Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Richard K. Sullivan Jr., Secretary Office of Coastal Zone Management Bruce K. Carlisle, Director A publication of the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management. This publication is funded (in part) by a grant/cooperative agreement from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 The Coastal Zone Management Act .................................................................................... 1 The Massachusetts Coastal Program ................................................................................. 2 History ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management .............................................................. 2 Networked Approach ................................................................................................................ 3 Jurisdiction - The Massachusetts Coastal Zone ...................................................................... 3 Program Plan Documents ........................................................................................................ 3 Federal Consistency Review ................................................................................................. 4 Coastal Effects ......................................................................................................................... 4 Activities Subject to Federal Consistency Review ................................................................... 5 General Permits ....................................................................................................................... 5 Pre-Application Consultation .................................................................................................... 6 Application Requirements, Review Procedures, and Timetables ............................................ 6 Necessary Data and Information ............................................................................................ 11 Cape Cod Commission Referral ........................................................................................... 13 Project Modifications .............................................................................................................. 13 Emergency Certifications ....................................................................................................... 13 Application of Coastal Policies in State Regulatory Programs ............................... 14 Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act .............................................................................. 14 Public Waterfront Act (Chapter 91) ........................................................................................ 14 Municipal Harbor Plans ......................................................................................................... 15 Wetlands Protection Act Regulations .................................................................................... 15 Oceans Sanctuaries Act ......................................................................................................... 16 Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan ............................................................................. 16 Massachusetts Coastal Program Policies ...................................................................... 18 Coastal Hazards ..................................................................................................................... 19 Energy .................................................................................................................................... 30 Growth Management .............................................................................................................. 36 Habitat .................................................................................................................................... 41 Ocean Resources ................................................................................................................... 50 Ports and Harbors .................................................................................................................. 57 Protected Areas ...................................................................................................................... 71 Public Access ......................................................................................................................... 78 Water Quality .......................................................................................................................... 92 Appendix 1 - Network Agencies and Memoranda of Understanding ................... 101 Appendix 2 - Legal Boundary of the Massachusetts Coastal Zone ...................... 117 Appendix 3 - Coastal Program Legal Authorities ....................................................... 143 Appendix 4 - Listed Federal Actions ............................................................................... 149 Appendix 5 – Enforceable Standards of the Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan .................................................................................................................. 153 INTRODUCTION This document presents the official policies of the Commonwealth’s coastal program and explains the federal consistency review process in Massachusetts. It also provides helpful context about the coastal program and contains important jurisdictional components. Specifically, it: • Summarizes the Coastal Zone Management Act, the federal legislation authorizing the coastal program. • Provides an overview of the Massachusetts coastal program, including its history, organizational structure, networked approach, jurisdiction, and program plan documents. • Explains the federal consistency review process, including the activities subject to review; general permits; pre-application consultation; application requirements, review procedures, and timetables; necessary data and information; project modifications; and emergency certifications. • Summarizes other state regulatory programs affected by the coastal program policies. • Presents the Massachusetts coastal program policies. • Provides appendices that include the network agencies, legal boundary of the Massachusetts coastal zone, coastal program legal authorities, and listed federal actions subject to federal consistency review. This Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Policy Guide (Policy Guide) is a component of the federally approved Massachusetts coastal program, replacing the 2002 Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management Plan. It is important to note that this guidance works with the other component documents of the approved Massachusetts coastal program (listed in the Program Plan Documents section on page 3) and specific statutory or regulatory provisions that form the legal basis for the Massachusetts coastal program. THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT In 1972, the U.S. Congress passed the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA), which establishes a national policy to “preserve, protect, develop, and where possible, to restore or enhance, the resources of the Nation’s coastal zone for this and succeeding generations.” The CZMA is also designed to “encourage and assist the states to exercise effectively their responsibilities in the coastal zone through the development and implementation of management programs to achieve wise use of the land and water resources of the coastal zone...” (16 U.S.C. 1452, § 303 (1) and (2)). This unique federal legislation gives states the opportunity to develop their own coastal management programs and federal funds to support such management. The federal agency that administers the CZMA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), has established a flexible framework that enables states to develop strategies that meet their specific needs within their state 1 governmental structure. The CZMA also gives states the authority to review federal projects, federally financed projects, and projects receiving federal licenses and permits (including those activities described in detail in Outer Continental Shelf plans), to ensure that they abide by state- defined enforceable coastal policies. This process is called federal consistency review. THE MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL PROGRAM Massachusetts’s coastal and ocean areas include abundant natural, recreational, and economic resources that have shaped the state’s history, economy, and way of life. The role of the Massachusetts coastal program is to balance human activities with the protection of these important resources.
Recommended publications
  • Tunnel from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia This Article Is About Underground Passages
    Tunnel From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about underground passages. For other uses, see Tunnel (disambiguation). "Underpass" redirects here. For the John Foxx song, see Underpass (song). Entrance to a road tunnel inGuanajuato, Mexico. Utility tunnel for heating pipes between Rigshospitalet and Amagerværket in Copenhagen,Denmark Tunnel on the Taipei Metro inTaiwan Southern portal of the 421 m long (1,381 ft) Chirk canal tunnel A tunnel is an underground or underwater passageway, dug through the surrounding soil/earth/rock and enclosed except for entrance and exit, commonly at each end. A pipeline is not a tunnel, though some recent tunnels have used immersed tube construction techniques rather than traditional tunnel boring methods. A tunnel may be for foot or vehicular road traffic, for rail traffic, or for a canal. The central portions of a rapid transit network are usually in tunnel. Some tunnels are aqueducts to supply water for consumption or for hydroelectric stations or are sewers. Utility tunnels are used for routing steam, chilled water, electrical power or telecommunication cables, as well as connecting buildings for convenient passage of people and equipment. Secret tunnels are built for military purposes, or by civilians for smuggling of weapons, contraband, or people. Special tunnels, such aswildlife crossings, are built to allow wildlife to cross human-made barriers safely. Contents [hide] 1 Terminology 2 History o 2.1 Clay-kicking 3 Geotechnical investigation and design o 3.1 Choice of tunnels vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Term Variation in Near-Highway Air Pollutant Gradients on a Winter Morning
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8341–8352, 2010 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/8341/2010/ Atmospheric doi:10.5194/acp-10-8341-2010 Chemistry © Author(s) 2010. CC Attribution 3.0 License. and Physics Short-term variation in near-highway air pollutant gradients on a winter morning J. L. Durant1, C. A. Ash1, E. C. Wood2, S. C. Herndon2, J. T. Jayne2, W. B. Knighton3, M. R. Canagaratna2, J. B. Trull1, D. Brugge4, W. Zamore5, and C. E. Kolb2 1Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA 2Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, MA, USA 3Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA 4School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA 5Mystic View Task Force, Somerville, MA, USA Received: 8 January 2010 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 25 February 2010 Revised: 19 August 2010 – Accepted: 20 August 2010 – Published: 6 September 2010 Abstract. Quantification of exposure to traffic-related air the highway reflecting reaction with NO. There was little if pollutants near highways is hampered by incomplete knowl- any evolution in the size distribution of 6–225 nm particles edge of the scales of temporal variation of pollutant gradi- with distance from the highway. These results suggest that to ents. The goal of this study was to characterize short-term improve the accuracy of exposure estimates to near-highway temporal variation of vehicular pollutant gradients within pollutants, short-term (e.g., hourly) temporal variations in 200–400 m of a major highway (>150 000 vehicles/d). Mon- pollutant gradients must be measured to reflect changes in itoring was done near Interstate 93 in Somerville (Mas- traffic patterns and local meteorology.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT TEAM DEVELOPERS Joe Fodera
    DEVELOPMENT TEAM DEVELOPERS CIVIL ENGINEER Joe Fodera Chris Sparages, P.E. Manager, Eaton Lakeview Development, LLC Williams & Sparages LLC 617-719-1613 617-981-5452 [email protected] [email protected] Joe Guy Fodera ARCHITECT Manager, Eaton Lakeview Development, LLC 781-888-2169 David DiBenedetto [email protected] Curtis DiBenedetto and Associates, Inc. 781-710-8334 Guy Fodera [email protected] Manager, Eaton Lakeview Development, LLC 617-877-9961 WETLANDS SPECIALIST [email protected] Bill Manuell ATTORNEYS Wetlands & Land Management Inc. 978-290-0144 Theodore C. Regnante, Esq. [email protected] Regnante, Sterio, & Osborne LLP 781-246-2525 TRAFFIC SPECIALIST [email protected] Kim Eric Hazarvartian, Ph.D., P.E. Jesse D. Schomer, Esq. TEPP LLC Regnante, Sterio, & Osborne LLP 603-212-9133 781-246-2525 [email protected] [email protected] 40B ADVISOR Ed Marchant EHM/Real Estate Advisor 617-739-2543 [email protected] Curtis DiBenedetto and Associates (CDA) has been providing architectural services to a wide range of clients and developers. The principals of CDA are Frank Pitts Curtis, RA and David Di Benedetto. CDA has worked closely with developers and local officials on a variety of project types including multifamily rental and ownership dwellings, mixed use projects, single family homes, industrial condos, public schools, banks, retail uses, and restaurants. With over 40 years of experience, our Staff is dedicated to providing our clients with exceptional quality and value through our architectural solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts House of Representatives: Upgrading Greater Boston MBTA Rail System St
    Massachusetts House of Representatives: Upgrading Greater Boston MBTA Rail System St. John’s Preparatory School - Danvers, Massachusetts - December 2020 Letter from the Chairs Dear Delegates, My name is Brett Butler. I am a Senior at St. John’s Prep, and I will serve as your chair for the Massachusetts House of Representatives on Railway Service. I have been involved in Model UN at the Prep for 5 years. Outside of Model UN, I am on the SJP Tennis Team, an Eagles’ Wings Leader, a member of Spire Society, a member of the National Honor Society, and a member of the Chinese National Honor Society. The topic of Railway Service has really fascinated me, since my father is an executive in the FTA (Federal Transit Administration), which is part of the DOT (Department of Transportation), and he has been my inspiration for my research into this topic. Also, I am a frequent passenger on the “T” and Commuter Rail (as well as commuter rail and subway services in many different cities such as Washington D.C., Los Angeles, and Montreal). Thus, I recommend that you read through this paper as well as to do your own research on the frequency, extension, and public trust in the Greater Boston Railway Service. Please do not hesitate to email me with any questions or concerns! I will be happy to assist you, and I look forward to meeting you in December! Thank you, Brett Butler ‘21 ([email protected]) Chair, Massachusetts House of Representatives on Railway Service, SJPMUN XV Dear Delegates, My name is Brendan O’Friel.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Coastal Zone Boundary Description
    Massachusetts Coastal Zone Boundary Description The following is the specification of the major roads, rail lines, other visible rights-of-way, or coordinates marking the inland boundary of the coastal zone. For consistency, the actual boundary is 100 feet inland of the landward side of this line, with the exception of municipal boundaries, where the municipal boundary is the limit of the line. This boundary narrative is organized into the following sections: Salisbury to western Gloucester, Eastern Gloucester and Rockport, Manchester- by-the-Sea to Saugus, Revere to Hingham, Weymouth to Plymouth, Cape Cod and the Islands, Wareham to Westport, and Mount Hope Bay. Salisbury to Western Gloucester Beginning at a point formed by the intersection of U.S. Route 1 (Lafayette Road) and the Massachusetts/New Hampshire state boundary; Thence generally southerly along U.S. Route 1 to the intersection of said line and Massachusetts Route 110 (School Street) in the town of Salisbury; Thence westerly along Massachusetts Route 110 to the intersection of said line and Interstate 95 in the town of Amesbury; Thence southwesterly along Interstate 95 to the intersection of said line and Ferry Road in the city of Newburyport; Thence southeasterly along Ferry Road to the intersection of said line and Massachusetts Route 113 (High Street); Thence southeasterly along Massachusetts Route 113 to the intersection of said line and U.S. Route 1 (Newburyport Turnpike); Thence southerly along U.S. Route 1 to the intersection of said line and Boston Road in the town
    [Show full text]
  • 360 Huntington Avenue–270 Ryder Hall Boston, MA 02115-5000
    *+*,.+"%0 +.#*%60%+* 1 / ,+/0#! 0!)$ .ORTHEASTERN 5NIVERSITY 360 Huntington Avenue–270 Ryder Hall Boston, MA 02115-5000 Encore Magazine is published for the alumni of the School of Professional and Continuing Studies, University College, the Lowell Institute School, Boston Evening School and the School of Education. www.spcs.neu.edu %NCORE4HE-AGAZINEFOR5NIVERSITY#OLLEGEAND3CHOOLOF0ROFESSIONALAND#ONTINUING3TUDIES!LUMNIAND&RIENDS&!,, In this issue: On Leadership That Works Anthony Truesdale (UC ’92, CBA ’97) Jean Kovacs (UC ’83) Rick Wrightson (UC ‘71) Upcoming Alumni Events September November MON Professional Networking Reception 10 Downtown campus Veterans’ Day Memorial Service Join your fellow alumni for a professional Networking Reception in the heart of Boston’s financial district. Join fellow Northeastern University alumni, family and friends in remembrance WED Sigma Membership Meeting 12 of those who served their country. THU An Evening with Dean Hopey 13 6:30 p.m., Homestead Restaurant THU An Evening with Dean Hopey and Lounge, Londonderry, NH 8 Aegean Restaurant, Framingham, MA Join fellow alumni living in New Hampshire Join fellow alumni living in the Metro West and dine with Dean Hopey. area and dine with Dean Hopey. TUE Insights WED Sigma Epsilon Rho Speaker Series 18 Enjoy a private harbor tour and dinner 14 6:00 p.m.–6:45 p.m. cruise and learn about the city’s history Attend a lecture on a topic of interest, open with Dr. Bill Fowler. to all. The lecture is followed by a membership www.neu.edu/alumni/insights meeting, open to Sigma members only. THU Brand You Workshop WED Insights 27 How do you want to be known? Learn to 14 Join us for a lecture by George Thrush followed develop your own brand in this free, half day by a discussion on the controversial moving of workshop offered by SPCS and the Tom Boston’s City Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • National Association of Accountants Executive Committee
    Management Accounting/ In Three Sections— Section 3 October 1966 WHAT PERSONAL OEVELOPMENT MEANS 10 - ONAL A Cr - , 1 t, IT 3 f, 'TQ Annual Report 1965 -66 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ACCOUNTANTS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE President Joseph L. Brumit, New York Vice Presidents J. Lynn Crandall, Indianapolis Robert J. Enersen, Florida West Central Philip L. Giroir, New Orleans Ray E. Longenecker, Lancaster Cary A. Marshall, Los Angeles Earl A. Matheney, Tulsa Robert A. Morgan, Peoria S. Alden Pendleton, Pittsburgh David W. Rewick, Cleveland Albert S. Roberts, Hartford Fred J. Sengstacke, New York Raymond E. Smith, Minneapolis Treasurer William H. Beadle, New York Appointed Members Donald J. Guth, Dallas John V. James, Dallas James E. Meredith, Jr., New York Grant U. Meyers, North Texas Kenneth R. Rickey, Peninsula -Palo Alto Julius G. Underwood, Harrisburg Past National Presidents Merwin P. Cass, Newark Colin A. Stillwagen, San Diego Chairmen of Standing Committees Accounting Development Paul W. Holt, Bridgeport Chapters Ettore Barbatelli, Milwaukee Finance and Budget Thomas L. Morison, Boston Membership Robert G. Chapman, Los Angeles Promotion and Public Relations Doren D. Vest, Washington Research Planning Robert Beyer, New York THE PRESIDENT'S REPORT I would like to report briefly on some of the activities of your Officers, Executive Committee and National Board during 1965 -66. Substantial growth and improvements were realized in the following areas: • The Future —The historic character of the accounting profession, and the role of the management accountant in business enterprise is changing rapidly. To insure that our goals, objectives, and organization are attuned to these changes, a long range planning effort was initi- ated by the appointment of a special committee chaired by Past National President, I.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Greetings, Restoration Friends and Colleagues: Spring Has
    May 2016 http://www.mass.gov/der Greetings, restoration friends and colleagues: Spring has finally arrived, perfect timing for you to take advantage of the Events section of our newsletter and thank you for sharing your wetland and river outings ensuring that we all get a healthy dose of the outdoors. Two project updates stand-out in this edition of Ebb&Flow, in large part because of their scale, underscoring that DER and partners are willing to take on exceedingly complex and ambitious projects. First, the Muddy Creek restoration is near complete after years of planning. A new $6.5 million, 94-foot wide bridge allows Muddy Creek to be reborn, restoring over 55-acres of degraded salt marsh. In Plymouth, the Tidmarsh restoration effort is in full swing, the project is our largest freshwater restoration project to date, at over 250 acres of restored wetland and 3.5 miles of reconstructed stream. Finally, we say goodbye to Laila Parker who has taken a job with the City of Boulder, Colorado. Best of luck to Laila who worked passionately and professionally to restore stream flow in our stressed basins; her new endeavors will most assuredly help to restore the watersheds of the Wild West. See you on the water. Tim Purinton, Director In this issue: Feature Article Project Updates Restoration Resources Events 1 The Massachusetts Division of Ecological Restoration is Hiring! Position: Watershed Ecologist (Environmental Analyst IV) Date of posting: 5/6/2016 Closing: The position will remain open until filled. However, first consideration will be given to those candidates that apply within the first 14 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Route 128, to Determine the Relationship Between Roadway Economic Development and Development of the Road
    MASSACHUSETIS ROUTE 128: A NONEMULATIVE ENIGMA Don Levitan, Center for Public Management, Suffolk University The objective of this paper is to examine the history of one of the first urban circumferential highways, Massachusetts Route 128, to determine the relationship between roadway economic development and development of the road. This economic development has long been thought to be directly related to the advent of the roadway. Therefore, many people have felt that similar economic attributes would follow construction of a similar roadway in an urban area. The results of this research tend to obviate that concept. The research covered the years 1925 through 1965 because initial construction occurred around 192 5 and "completion" and widening (in several locations) had occurred by 1965. Furthermore, by 1965 substantial economic development had taken place along the highway. The results of this investigation indicated that the initial economic develop­ ment along the roadway may be ascribed to previous events (antecedent development) and as such was a continuation of earlier processes. Thus the possibility exists that this initial economic development would have occurred without the construction of the road. Economic development as­ sociated with this roadway was concluded to be part of the developmental forces operating in the Boston urban area rather than as a benefit from the roadway itself. •MASSACHUSETTS Route 128 is a limited-access circumferential highway encircling the Boston metropolitan area. When originally conceived, it was not considered a factor in the economic growth of the metropolitan area; its initial function was to link suburban communities while bypassing Boston proper. The purpose of this paper is to examine the history o! this roadway and in so doing to show that the economic development of the roadway did not follow any grand plan but was a fortuitous product of the general pattern of urban development.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Reading Massachusetts Annual Report
    Town of READING Massachusetts Annual Report 1977 Town of READING MASSACHUSETTS Annual Report Of The Town Officers For The Year Ended December 31, 1977 1 READING PUBLIC LIBRARY READING, MASSACHUSETTS Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/townofreadingmas1977read Statistics Area — 10 square miles. Population, 1977 — 23,399 REGISTERED RESIDENTS PRECINCT PRECINCT 17 & OLDER UNDER 17 TOTAL 1 840 2118 2958 2 890 2179 3069 3 661 2304 2965 4 882 2014 2896 5 678 2070 2748 6 791 2148 2939 7 813 2076 2889 8 889 2046 2935 6444 16955 23399 Reading Residents 65 + = 8.1% of Population. REGISTERED VOTERS Precinct Republicans Democrats Independent Total 1 388 542 646 1576 2 304 573 619 1496 3 318 486 622 1426 4 444 451 629 1524 5 390 497 591 1478 6 455 531 628 1614 7 477 466 657 1600 8 395 477 679 1551 3171 4023 5071 12265 HOUSING Public Housing. Tannerville Elderly Housing — 80 Units. Section 8 Subsidized Housing — 55 Units. 3 TYPE NO: UNITS One Family Homes 5532 1 Two Family Homes 377 754 Three Family Homes 23 69 Four Family & Over 31 1660 Store Apartments 29 29 Commercial 137 Industrial 26 Federal: Seventh Congressional District Edward J. Markey — 223-2781 2100-A J.F.K. Bldg. Boston, Mass. 02203 Senators Edward M. Kennedy — 223-2826 2400 J.F.K. Bldg. Boston, Mass. 02203 Edward W. Brooke - 223-7240 2003-H J.F.K. Bldg. Boston, Mass. 02203 State: Fifth Councillor District Dr. John F. Markey — 1-683-8782— OFFICE 246 Turnpike St.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Policy Guide
    Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Policy Guide October 2011 Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management 251 Causeway Street, Suite 800 Boston, MA 02114-2136 (617) 626-1200 CZM Information Line - (617) 626-1212 CZM Website - www.mass.gov/czm Commonwealth of Massachusetts Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lieutenant Governor Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Richard K. Sullivan Jr., Secretary Office of Coastal Zone Management Bruce K. Carlisle, Director A publication of the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management. This publication is funded (in part) by a grant/cooperative agreement from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 The Coastal Zone Management Act .................................................................................... 1 The Massachusetts Coastal Program ................................................................................. 2 History ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management .............................................................. 2 Networked Approach ................................................................................................................ 3 Jurisdiction - The Massachusetts Coastal Zone .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Suitability of Multiple Dispersion and Land Use 2 Regression Models for Urban Traffic-Related Ultrafine 3 Particles
    Page 1 of 33 Environmental Science & Technology 1 Assessing the Suitability of Multiple Dispersion and Land Use 2 Regression Models for Urban Traffic-Related Ultrafine 3 Particles 4 Allison P Patton*1,2 , Chad Milando 2,3, John L Durant 2, Prashant Kumar 4,5 5 6 1 Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA 7 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA 8 3 Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann 9 Arbor, MI, USA 10 4 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences 11 (FEPS), University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, United Kingdom 12 5 Environmental Flow (EnFlo) Research Centre, FEPS, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United 13 Kingdom 14 15 Submitted to Environmental Science & Technology 16 17 *Corresponding Author: 18 170 Frelinghuysen Road 19 Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA 20 Email: [email protected]; Secondary Email: [email protected] 21 Phone: +1 848 445-3194 22 Fax: +1 732 445-0131 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Environmental Science & Technology Page 2 of 33 23 Abstract Art 24 25 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment Page 3 of 33 Environmental Science & Technology 26 Abstract 27 Comparative evaluations are needed to assess the suitability of near-road air pollution models for 28 traffic-related ultrafine particle number concentration (PNC). Our goal was to evaluate the ability of 29 dispersion (CALINE4, AERMOD, R-LINE, and QUIC) and regression models to predict PNC in a residential 30 neighborhood (Somerville) and an urban center (Chinatown) near highways in and near Boston, 31 Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]