DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Challenges and Advances in Modification of Food Package

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Challenges and Advances in Modification of Food Package RESEARCH ARTICLE Challenges and Advances in Development of Active Components to Modify Headspace Gases in Packaging of Fresh Produce and Muscle Foods PREFACE API 2015 Ziynet Boz Bruce A. Welt* University of Florida University of Florida Jeffrey K. Brecht William Pelletier University of Florida University of Florida Eric McLamore Greg Kiker University of Florida University of Florida Jason E. Butler University of Florida ABSTRACT Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP) has been widely used as an effective way to preserve foods. Fresh produce, meat and meat products, seafood, and dairy products can benefit from modified gaseous atmospheres, which are usually achieved by reducing oxygen and increasing carbon dioxide concentrations, within limits, defined by product tolerances. MAP of fresh produce is particularly challenging because products are living and respiring. Respiration rates depend on several factors including temperature, oxygen, and carbon dioxide concentrations. Balancing package permeation with respiration is challenging, often due to limited selection of practical packaging materials. Failing to remain within tolerance limits of products leads to rapid quality loss. Gas barrier properties of packages determined rate of gas exchange with the external environment and is a critical factor for achieving tolerable levels. Availability of packaging materials that meet requirement of specific produce is essential. Relative permeability of common films to carbon dioxide is about 3 to 6 times of that to oxygen, often leading to package collapse for package atmospheres that benefit from carbon dioxide. Films often fail to provide desired oxygen transmission rates, high carbon dioxide to oxygen selectivity and desired mechanical properties simultaneously. Despite advances, minimal availability and high cost of selective barrier films limit applications of MAP for fresh produce packaging. Therefore, active packaging components and films are being developed and designed to overcome these limitations. Inserts or films that contain active mixtures as gas emitters Challenges and Advances in Development of Active Components 62 RESEARCH ARTICLE and/or scavengers are now commercially available. “Clean label” trends are motivating alternative approaches using active packaging components. KEY WORDS modified atmosphere packaging, MAP, food, muscle, fresh, produce, respiring, respiration, active packaging PREFACE API 2015 *Bruce A. Welt Corresponding Author [email protected] INTRODUCTION ergonomic and aesthetic designs. Technologies such as active and intelligent packaging have been The food industry has been shaped by changing proposed, but have not yet been fully realized com- consumer demands and availability of a wide variety mercially [7]. Modified atmosphere packaging of foods. Past decades have witnessed the increased (MAP) can provide benefits by slowing deteriora- consumption of products with proven advantages tive reactions. Sales volumes of advanced packag- to human health and well-being. Fruits and veg- ing technologies and MAP continue to grow and etables were demonstrated to have health benefits are anticipated to reach $6.4 billion by 2020 [8]. against chronic disease and cancer [1]. Fish and One of the most challenging aspects of MAP is the lean red meats provide essential macro and micro- unique atmospheric requirements for the variety of nutrients [2], [3]. Muscle food products remain the products. In red meats, oxygen is necessary for the main source of protein and nutrients [4]. Accel- bright red color expected by consumers, but oxygen erating consumption of fresh produce, meat and also contributes to degradative oxidation. There- fish has led to improved post-harvest/post-mortem fore, techniques to control oxygen exposure are of handling, processing, packaging, transportation, value to red meat products. Respiring fresh produce and retail practices. However, the perishable and require distinct levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide. variable aspect of natural, high-value products con- Typically, oxygen levels lower than atmospheric tinues to challenge industry to develop methods to and carbon dioxide higher than atmospheric are preserve “freshness” without compromising safety. needed. Great care is required to ensure that oxygen Improved preservation could mitigate loss of nearly is not reduced to levels that result in anaerobic res- one-third of foods produced [5]. Recent consumer piration. For fish, the primary goal of MAP is pre- preferences for minimally processed foods and venting microbial growth. Relatively high carbon overall “freshness” have led marketing efforts to dioxide levels help to reduce pH via equilibrium switch focus from “shelf life extension” to “pres- of the dissolved gas with carbonic acid. Therefore, ervation of preferred quality” Although shelf life is flushing packages with carbon dioxide as high as an important parameter, the main selling factor is 100% by volume may prove useful [9]. quality as perceived by the consumers [6]. Elevated carbon dioxide concentrations are Packaging innovations have been mainly often desirable in packaged foods anti-microbial limited to barrier modifications as well as improved effects, regardless of product type. Carbon dioxide is Journal of Applied Packaging Research 63 soluble in aqueous solutions, food tissues and packag- The European Commission Regulation (EC) ing materials. Rate of permeation of carbon dioxide No 450/2009 on active packaging defines active through polymers is three to seven times greater than materials as “Materials and articles that are for oxygen [10]–[12]. A comprehensive review on O2/ intended to extend the shelf-life or to maintain or CO2 diffusivity and solubility in a variety of foods and improve the condition of packaged food; they are polymers was written by Chaix et al. [13]. designed to deliberately incorporate components Loss of gas from packages combined with sol- that would release or absorb substances into or ubility of headspace gases in packaged products from the packaged food or the environment sur- causes reductions in volume in flexible packaging, rounding the food can aid overcoming product- resulting in unattractive, deflated packages that may specific challenges”. Thus, active packaging is con- appear to be less than “fresh” [10], [14]–[16]. Defla- sidered a secondary level of packaging, but may tion [17] causes misconceptions about defects related play a role in primary functions, such as modified to products and/or packaging, such as inferior pack- atmosphere [19]. Gas emitting or scavenging via aging materials or methods, microbiological activity active components comprises a significant portion or seal defects. Industry recognizes package volume of active packaging. Adjustment of package gas changes as a problem and works to mitigate the requires knowledge of effects on biochemical pro- problem by adjusting initial volumes of headspace cesses, physical interactions, microbial flora [20], gases and by considering shipping distances [18]. and other variabilities. MAP and AP applications Understanding the distinct atmospheric may be justified based upon value-added consumer requirements of foods drives research, process- convenience, new product opportunities that did not ing and packaging innovation. MAP advances otherwise exist, branding opportunities, extended have been realized in mathematical modeling and maintenance of quality, reduced waste, and/or computer simulation, materials development and higher margins. Increasingly, due to regulatory properties analysis and measurement and gas gen- and/or consumer preference, chemical preserva- eration, mixing and handling. Modified package tives cannot be added in certain foods or package atmospheres may be obtained actively or passively. materials. For this reason, vacuum packaging, due “Active” MAP involves injection of the desired to its simplicity and effectiveness, remains partic- atmosphere into packages so as to instantly arrive ularly important [21]. For example, a recent trend at the targeted atmosphere. “Passive” MAP relies of “clean-label” products creates an opportunity for upon interactions among product (e.g. product res- food preservation through MAP and AP by elimi- piration rate), package (i.e. gas transmission rates) nating artificial food-additives [22]. and the environment (i.e. ambient gas composition and temperature) to arrive at target atmospheres MAP AND PRODUCT CONSIDER- sometime after packaging. Often, optimal modified ATIONS atmospheres cannot be attained using commercially available packaging materials and/or gas flushing. For example, due to differences in permeation rates Map Considerations for Fresh Produce of gases, we may be able to achieve the desired level Biological activity in fresh produce continues for oxygen or carbon dioxide, but not both at the after detachment from the plant. Harvested produce same time. Additionally, carbon dioxide emitters draws resources from its own stores causing degra- may be used to prevent package collapse. dation. Deterioration rate is influenced by respiration Challenges and Advances in Development of Active Components 64 rate, ethylene sensitivity and exposure, genetics, Oxygen serves as final electron acceptor in physical injuries, microbiological activity and physi- aerobic respiration reactions [35]. The typical goal ological disorders [23]. Generally, reduction of respi- of MAP is to reduce oxygen to the lowest possible ration rate is the primary objective of MAP for fresh level that supports
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FDA Compliance and Printing Inks Often Printers Have Questions
    FDA Compliance and Printing Inks Often Printers have questions concerning the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and compliance of the inks used to print on food packaging applications. The FDA permits the use of inks (e.g. solvent base, water base and UV) as components of food packaging under certain conditions. Several items must be understood before one can determine if a printing ink is suitable for use on food packaging applications: “Direct Food Additives” are substances directly and intentionally added to foods, including, but not limited to, ingredients, preservatives, colors and stabilizers. “Indirect Food Additives” generally refer to substances that are not intended to, but can become, components of food as a result of use in articles that contact food (e.g. ink on food packaging applications). Both “Direct and Indirect Food Additives” require complex petitions and filings with the FDA that can be very costly, burdensome and time consuming. Nazdar inks are not designed to be and are not approved as Direct or Indirect Food Additives. However, if an ink on food packaging applications is not expected to become a component of the food under its intended conditions of use, it is not a food additive by definition and, therefore, may be used without the need to obtain any FDA clearance. A properly conducted migration study is considered to be a sound basis for concluding that the substance is not a food additive. This study should be performed in accordance with FDA’s guidance document, entitled; Preparation of Food Contact Notifications and Food Additive Petitions for Food Contact Substances: Chemistry Recommendations https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry- preparation-premarket-submissions-food-contact-substances-chemistry Another method of concluding that a substance is not a food additive is the use of a functional barrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Handbook 0.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1. Status, market size and scope of fruit and vegetable processing 4 industry in India 1.2. Selection and procurement 5 1.3. Supply chain of fruits and vegetables 15 1.4. Pack house handling of fruits and vegetables 19 1.5. Primary Processing of Fruits and Vegetables 26 1.6. Unit operations in fruits and vegetables processing 30 1.7. Minimal Processing of Fruits and Vegetables 42 Chapter 2: Value addition of Fruits and Vegetables 2.1. Processing of fruit pulp/puree 49 2.2. Processing of Jams 50 2.3. Processing of Jellies 54 2.4. Processing of osmotic dehydrated product 59 2.5. Preservation by chemicals 63 2.6. Processing of Sauce 65 2.7. Processing of Ketchup 67 2.8. Processing of Pickles 73 2.9. Processing of Chutneys 80 2.10. Processing of Fruit Juices 82 Chapter 3: Packaging of Fruits and Vegetable Products 3.1. Levels, functions and desirable features of packaging 93 3.2. Packaging materials and their properties 95 3.3. Special Packaging systems 112 3.4. Properties/characteristics of foods, packaging requirement and 115 methods 3.5. MAP of fruits and vegetables 116 3.6. Mechanical injuries of fruits and vegetables 118 3.7. Shelf life of packaged food and its determination 121 3.8. Storage of Fruits and Vegetables 124 Chapter 4: Food safety regulations & certification 4.1. Need for testing of food 130 4.2. List of Notified Reference Laboratories in India – 1 131 4.3. List of Notified Reference Laboratories in India – 2 132 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Safety Reduced Oxygen Packaging- Including Vacuum Packaging
    Food Safety Reduced Oxygen Packaging- including Vacuum packaging UVM Extension Fact Sheet- June 2013 Many food processors are interested in using vacuum packaging and other types of Reduced Oxygen Packaging (ROP). However, it is also important to know the food safety concerns and regulations associated with this packaging option. Benefits of ROP - Removal of oxygen prevents growth of aerobic spoilage organisms responsible for off-odors and texture changes. - Reduces oxidation of foods, retards rancidity and color deterioration. - Increases quality and shelf-life of refrigerated foods, which increases marketing appeal. Types of Reduced Oxygen Packaging include: a) Vacuum packaging: air is removed from a package of food and the package is hermetically sealed, so that a vacuum remains inside the package, such as sous vide. b) Modified atmosphere packaging: the atmosphere of the package is modified so that its composition is different from outside air (21% oxygen), but the atmosphere may change over time due to permeability of the packaging material or respiration of the food. Note that this method is generally considered safer than vacuum packaging as it generally maintains enough oxygen to control the growth of Clostridium botulinum. c) Controlled atmosphere packaging: the atmosphere of a food package is modified so that while the package is sealed, its composition is different from air, and continuous control of that atmosphere is maintained, such as by using oxygen scavengers or a combination of total replacement of oxygen, non-respiring food, and impermeable packaging material. What are the food safety concerns with vacuum packaging? A dangerous bacterium called Clostridium botulinum, which is not detectable by sight or smell, can grow in the absence of oxygen such as in vacuum packaged or canned foods.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Brochure Audion
    //// F O O D PACKAGING SOLUTIONS THE STORY OF AUDION Audion Elektro B.V. was established in 1947 in Amsterdam. In the fifties the company started to focus on manufacturing sealing machines besides the trading business. In the past decades Audion has grown to become a leading name in the packaging industry. Today, with a worldwide dealer network, Audion is represented in more than 65 countries throughout the world. Audion packaging machines are characterised by outstanding quality. By keeping control over the development and production of the machines in the Netherlands and Germany, Audion has ma- naged to stay flexible and customer oriented. The service Audion provides is regarded as a decisive advantage by our customers. Short delivery times of machines, parts and accessories and innovative solutions to diverse packaging problems are important qualities that distinguish Audion in the industry. With Audion, you have a large choice of packaging machines that meet your production requirements. The experience and expertise accumulated over the years, in finding solutions for customers, is unique. The extensive machine range on our website (audion.com) shows that there’s a solution for every packaging problem. Together we make the perfect package. Audion, Groenburgwal 31, Amsterdam Established 1947 |||| FOOD MARKETS |||| |||| |||| |||| |||| E-FULFILLMENT |||| MEDICAL / PHARMA / HIGH-TECH |||| PARTS MARKETS |||| |||| |||| |||| FOOD MAGNETA 300 GPS If we speak about a machine which Hygienic stainless steel machine made for has proven itself! The Magneta is a user the food/retail industry. friendly and low maintenance impulse The GPS range consists of versatile systems sealer. The Magneta range consists of a to pack and present your deli products in SEALING complete range with different sized mo- the best possible way.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Processing for Safe, Shelf-Stable and Ready-To-Eat Food
    IAEA-TECDOC-1337 Radiation processing for safe, shelf-stable and ready-to-eat food Proceedings of a final Research Co-ordination Meeting held in Montreal, Canada, 10–14 july 2000 January 2003 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Food and Environmental Protection Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria RADIATION PROCESSING FOR SAFE, SHELF-STABLE AND READY-TO-EAT FOOD IAEA, VIENNA, 2003 IAEA-TECDOC-1337 ISBN 92–0–100703–5 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2003 Printed by the IAEA in Austria January 2003 FOREWORD The increasingly busy lifestyles of populations in many countries have driven the demand for safe, convenient and ready-to-eat food. Traditional food processes such as drying, canning or refrigeration offer a partial solution to this demand as the sensory quality of such food may be significantly affected or the products may be contaminated by pathogenic bacteria during preparation. For developing countries, safe shelf-stable food without the need for refrigeration would offer advantages. In addition, the increasing number of immuno-compromised populations in many countries requires a new approach to food safety to meet their needs. Irradiation offers a potential to enhance microbiological safety and quality of food through shelf-life extension. The benefits of irradiation as a sanitary treatment of many types of food are well known, some of which are applied commercially in several countries. Little data were available, however, on the effect of irradiation on minimally processed food and composite food including prepared meals. A Co-ordinated Research Project (CRP) on the Development of Safe, Shelf-Stable and Ready-to-Eat Food through Radiation Processing therefore was implemented by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture in 1996 to evaluate the role of irradiation for such food.
    [Show full text]
  • No 1333/2008 of the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT and of the COUNCIL of 16 December 2008 on Food Additives (Text with EEA Relevance)
    2008R1333 — EN — 21.04.2015 — 022.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B REGULATION (EC) No 1333/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2008 on food additives (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p. 16) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Regulation (EU) No 238/2010 of 22 March 2010 L 75 17 23.3.2010 ►M2 Commission Regulation (EU) No 1129/2011 of 11 November 2011 L 295 1 12.11.2011 ►M3 amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1152/2013 of 19 L 311 1 20.11.2013 November 2013 ►M4 Commission Regulation (EU) No 1130/2011 of 11 November 2011 L 295 178 12.11.2011 ►M5 Commission Regulation (EU) No 1131/2011 of 11 November 2011 L 295 205 12.11.2011 ►M6 Commission Regulation (EU) No 232/2012 of 16 March 2012 L 78 1 17.3.2012 ►M7 Commission Regulation (EU) No 380/2012 of 3 May 2012 L 119 14 4.5.2012 ►M8 Commission Regulation (EU) No 470/2012 of 4 June 2012 L 144 16 5.6.2012 ►M9 Commission Regulation (EU) No 471/2012 of 4 June 2012 L 144 19 5.6.2012 ►M10 Commission Regulation (EU) No 472/2012 of 4 June 2012 L 144 22 5.6.2012 ►M11 Commission Regulation (EU) No 570/2012 of 28 June 2012 L 169 43 29.6.2012 ►M12 Commission Regulation (EU) No 583/2012 of 2 July 2012 L 173 8 3.7.2012 ►M13 Commission Regulation (EU) No 675/2012 of 23 July 2012 L 196 52 24.7.2012 ►M14 Commission Regulation (EU) No 1049/2012 of 8 November 2012 L 310 41 9.11.2012 ►M15 Commission Regulation (EU) No 1057/2012 of 12 November 2012
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Modified Atmosphere Packaging and Controlled Atmospheres on Aroma, Flavor, and Quality of Horticultural Commodities
    Impacts of Modified Atmosphere Packaging and Controlled Atmospheres on Aroma, Flavor, and Quality of Horticultural Commodities James Mattheis1 and John K. Fellman2 ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. anaerobiosis, volatiles, ethanol, acetaldehyde, esters SUMMARY. The commercial use of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) technology provides a means to slow the processes of ripening and senescence during storage, transport, and marketing of many fresh fruit and vegetables. The benefits of MAP and controlled atmosphere (CA) technologies for extending postharvest life of many fruit and vegetables have been recognized for many years. Although both technologies have been and continue to be exten- sively researched, more examples of the impacts of CA on produce quality are available in the literature and many of these reports were used in development of this review. Storage using MAP, similar to the use of CA storage, impacts most aspects of produce quality although the extent to which each quality attribute responds to CA or modified atmosphere (MA) condi- tions varies among commodities. Impacts of MAP and CA on flavor and aroma are dependent on the composition of the storage atmosphere, avoidance of anaerobic conditions, storage duration, and the use of fresh-cut technologies before storage. number of factors modify the impact of MAP on produce quality. Package gas composition determines the effectiveness of any packaging system. Reduced O and elevated CO con- A 2 2 centrations must be sufficiently stringent to slow metabolism and provide shelf-life extension while also being within the tolerance range of the stored commodity to avoid induction of anaerobic stress. Tem- perature management is critical as gas composition within packages changes with temperature (see Kader et al., 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Amcor/Bemis: Flexible Medical Packaging Overlaps Draw DOJ Scrutiny
    Vol. 6 No. 400 November 9, 2018 Amcor/Bemis: Flexible Medical Packaging Overlaps Draw DOJ Scrutiny Deal Update DOJ staff attorneys investigating Amcor’s proposed $5.2 billion purchase of packaging rival Bemis (BMS) have keyed in on two healthcare product lines in which the merging parties overlap, sources familiar with the matter said. The deal would combine two of the three dominant producers of coated TyVek, a breathable medical packaging film that can be sterilized. The tie-up would also join two significant U.S. converters of vented medical bags. DOJ staff has interviewed industry participants about these overlaps as recently as two weeks ago, the sources said. Given market shares and competitive dynamics, the merging firms’ overlap in coated TyVek raises a more significant antitrust issue than the vented medical bag overlap, industry sources said. Reflecting this dynamic, sources said that over time, DOJ interviews have become more focused on coated TyVek, to the exclusion of vented medical bags. The merging parties also overlap in food packaging, but these markets are generally fragmented and characterized by a more robust competitive environment than their medical counterparts. Amcor and Bemis, who announced their deal on August 6, have not disclosed the receipt of a DOJ second request. Spokespeople for Amcor and the DOJ declined to comment. Bemis did not respond to requests for comment. Coated flexible medical packaging. Amcor and Bemis both produce various types of sterile flexible medical packaging, which is sold to medical device manufacturers to protect medical equipment and devices ultimately sold to hospital groups and doctors.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Packaging Made from Recycled Paper and Board
    Page 1 of 3 Food Packaging made from Recycled Paper and Board Monitoring in Europe of packaging and foods has identified mineral oil contamination in a range of packaged foods. Mineral oils are widely used, and end up in foodstuffs by various routes. Since then, almost all sectors of the food industry as well as laboratories and supply industry have been concerned with the presence of mineral hydrocarbons and investigated into their origin. As a result, industry has gained a comprehensive understanding of the different sources of mineral oil contaminations.1 Many measures for the reduction of the transfer and occurrence of undesired mineral oils that have already been taken show objectively measurable success. There are many different routes by which contamination of foodstuffs with mineral oils can occur. Food packaging has been identified as one of these sources. EuPIA members have long offered mineral oil-free inks to be applied to the non-food side of packaging, and recommend that only these inks are used for these applications. Mineral oils can, however, migrate from recycled paper and board used for food packaging. In several EU member states the food packaging chain was called to take measures such that levels of mineral oil in foodstuffs are reduced. The European Commission has issued a recommendation2 on the monitoring of mineral oil hydrocarbons in food and in materials and articles intended to come into contact with food in 2017. In Germany the BMEL has drafted a legislation aimed at restricting mineral oil in food contact materials made from recycled paper and board.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Packaging Technology
    FOOD PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY Edited by RICHARD COLES Consultant in Food Packaging, London DEREK MCDOWELL Head of Supply and Packaging Division Loughry College, Northern Ireland and MARK J. KIRWAN Consultant in Packaging Technology London Blackwell Publishing © 2003 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered Editorial Offices: trademarks, and are used only for identification 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ and explanation, without intent to infringe. Tel: +44 (0) 1865 776868 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK First published 2003 Tel: +44 (0) 1865 791100 Blackwell Munksgaard, 1 Rosenørns Allè, Library of Congress Cataloging in P.O. Box 227, DK-1502 Copenhagen V, Publication Data Denmark A catalog record for this title is available Tel: +45 77 33 33 33 from the Library of Congress Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton South, British Library Cataloguing in Victoria 3053, Australia Publication Data Tel: +61 (0)3 9347 0300 A catalogue record for this title is available Blackwell Publishing, 10 rue Casimir from the British Library Delavigne, 75006 Paris, France ISBN 1–84127–221–3 Tel: +33 1 53 10 33 10 Originated as Sheffield Academic Press Published in the USA and Canada (only) by Set in 10.5/12pt Times CRC Press LLC by Integra Software Services Pvt Ltd, 2000 Corporate Blvd., N.W. Pondicherry, India Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA Printed and bound in Great Britain, Orders from the USA and Canada (only) to using acid-free paper by CRC Press LLC MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall USA and Canada only: For further information on ISBN 0–8493–9788–X Blackwell Publishing, visit our website: The right of the Author to be identified as the www.blackwellpublishing.com Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Packaging: a Guide to Best Practice for Sheetfed Offset Print
    Food Packaging: A Guide to Best Practice for Sheetfed Offset Print Version: October 2018 CONTENT The aim of this guide 2 1 Interaction between food and printed packaging: the danger areas 3 2 Legislation and control systems 5 3 Practical recommendations for printers and converters to minimise migration risk 7 4 Frequently asked questions 10 FLINT GROUP – COMMITTED TO PROVIDING EXCEPTIONAL PRODUCTS AND EXPERTISE TO PACKAGING AND LABEL CONVERTERS WORLDWIDE ... The aim of this guide Flint Group is a dedicated supplier of printing inks for the packaging and label industry. Based on our expertise in this field of application we designed this guide as an overview of the macro issues related to food packaging regulations; providing printers and packaging converters with a sound understanding of the issues that can arise through the interaction of foods with their packaging. It highlights the most relevant legislation, and provides recommendations that can help promote best practices in the choice of inks for food packaging and other topics that need to be taken care of when printing packaging and labels for food applications. Food packaging – naturally sensitive Food packaging is a sensitive area, and manufacturers in this segment must focus on the highest levels of manufacturing controls in line with the imperative of protecting the consumer. This is naturally the subject of extensive legislation, which applies to all the packaging components of a packaged food – including the label. All suppliers in the food packaging value chain have to ensure that their contributions do not in any way endanger consumer health – for example through the migration of undesirable substances into the foodstuffs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
    ZAZ 0701 Finding Green Solutions for Nypro, Inc A Major Qualifying Project Submitted to the Faculty Of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By ________________________ Emily Allietta ________________________ Catherine Maki Date: March 4, 2008 Approved: __________________________________ Professor Amy Zeng, Primary Advisor 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ 2 Table of Figures .................................................................................................................. 4 Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 6 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 7 2 Literature Review........................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Purchasing Strategies .............................................................................................. 10 2.2 Energy and Gas ....................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Gas Trends ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]