Report on the Lottery Sector in Europe 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Annual Report 2015 Staatliche Toto-Lotto Gmbh Baden-Württemberg
Annual Report 2015 Staatliche Toto-Lotto GmbH Baden-Württemberg Staatliche Toto-Lotto GmbH Baden-Württemberg Nordbahnhofstraße 201 70191 Stuttgart Telephone: +49 711-81 000-0 Telefax: +49 711-81 000-40 [email protected] www.lotto-bw.de www.spielen-mit-verantwortung.de Staatliche Toto-Lotto GmbH Baden-Württemberg Annual Report 2015 1 Table of Contents 1 Table of Contents 2 Foreword 4 Business development 2015 6 Overview of gaming types 6 LOTTO 6aus49 6 Eurojackpot 7 Spiel 77 and SUPER 6 8 KENO and plus 5 8 Silvester-Millionen 9 GlücksSpirale 10 TOTO 10 ODDSET 10 Instant lotteries 11 Balance sheet of winners 12 Lottery funding 14 Responsible Gaming 16 Lotto online 18 Lotto Baden-Württemberg on social media 20 Information processing 21 Customer service 22 Sales organisation 23 Employee development 24 Corporate communication 25 Memberships and certificates 26 History of the company 28 Organs of the Company Legal Notice 2 Annual Report 2015 Staatliche Toto-Lotto GmbH Baden-Württemberg Staatliche Toto-Lotto GmbH Baden-Württemberg Annual Report 2015 3 Foreword Dear readers, The very first winning number drawn in the Especially for our regular customers, we hired a Stuttgarter LOTTO was the magical number 13, drawn on marquee at the Cannstatter Wasen in October, Nachrichten, 9 October 1955. In the ongoing ranking of num- and celebrated the anniversary with more than May 11, 1957. bers drawn, it is currently in the last place. 4,000 guests. As well as the many celebrations, 60 years on, the 43 is the most frequently we strengthened our core business in 2015. -
Table of Contents
Table of contents Page 2 of 19 Table of contents ....................................................................................................................... 2 1. Lotteries in the EU and Europe 2012 - Executive Summary .................................................... 3 2. Introduction and background .................................................................................................... 5 3. Tables and figures Table ........................................................................................................... 7 1a: Participating lotteries in the EU .............................................................................................. 7 Table 1b: Participating lotteries outside the EU ............................................................................ 8 Table 2: GGR 2012 in the EU by game category .......................................................................... 8 Figure 1: GGR 2012 in the EU by game category ........................................................................ 9 Table 3: GGR 2012 for EL members by game category ............................................................... 9 Table 4: Lottery sales 2012 in the EU by game category ........................................................... 10 Figure 2: Lottery sales 2012 in the EU by game category .......................................................... 10 Table 5: Lottery sales 2012 for EL members by game category ................................................. 10 Table 6: GGR development in the -
Regulating the National Lottery
Section 5 Regulating the National Lottery The Third National Lottery Licence May 2021 The Third Licence Conditions 1. Grant of Licence 2. Definitions and Interpretation 3. Commencement 4. Handover from the Previous Licence 5. Service requirement 6. Prohibition of activities not related to the National Lottery 7. Consumer Protection 8. Retailer commission and retailer management 9. Independent section 6 licence applicants 10. Information and reporting 11. Payments to the Secretary of State 11A. Promotion of the National Lottery 12. Shareholders, other Connected parties and debt providers 13. Vetting 14. Control environment 15. Contractors 16. Employees 17. Performance monitoring 18. Handover on expiry or revocation of the Licence 19. Security for Players’ funds 20. Confidentiality and freedom of information 21. Intellectual Property 22. Data Protection 23. Licence extensions 24. No waiver 25. Severability 26. Governing Law and jurisdiction 27. Third Party rights 28. Notices 29. Survival Schedules Schedule 1 Definitions Schedule 2 Part 1 Games and facilities to be available in the first five weeks of the Licence Schedule 2 Part 2 Financial penalties Schedule 2 Part 3 Schedule 3 Handover from the Previous Licensee Schedule 4 Part 1 Ancillary activities that the Commission has consented to Schedule 4 Part 2 Further Conditions relating to Ancillary Activities Schedule 5 The Ancillary Activity Payment Schedule 6 Schedule 7 Codes of practice and strategies Schedule 8 Primary and Secondary Contributions Part 1 Definitions and interpretation Schedule -
Public Gaming International Magazine May/June 2017
The Damage to Brand efore exploring the ways and means The key part of the sentence is “where the Lottery Bto displace illegal operators from the consumer is located” as opposed to where marketplace, we should begin by clari- the operator is located. The members of the Caused fying what it means to be an illegal illegal gaming community are continually operator, define the difference between legal exploiting new developments in technol- and illegal lottery. That definition varies ogy and legal loopholes to claim that a legal by Lottoland depending on the continent, the country, or license in one jurisdiction entitles them to even within the jurisdiction you are taking as operate in all without regard to the legal- and Illegal a reference. Let’s refer to the definition artic- ity in the jurisdiction where the consumer ulated by the Council of Europe Convention resides. This posture enables them to essen- “Secondary” on the Manipulation of Sports Competitions. tially hijack the revenues of legally licensed It addresses the issue of match-fixing in operators all around the world, depriving the Lotteries: sports, but it is a definition that can apply good causes supported by licensed operators to all forms of games-of-chance. It is the and channeling those profits over to private first time that an international institution shareholders. The evidence of this is already A Call to has endeavored to clarify the boundaries that having a big impact in Europe and Australia. separate legal from illegal gambling. Article Action 35A of the Council of Europe Convention on the Manipulation of Sports Competitions The business model of these “secondary establishes that any sports betting activ- lotteries” works like this: First, they tech- ity whose type or operator is not allowed nically are not operating a lottery. -
September | 2020
September | 2020 The coronavirus pandemic has changed the way we use the internet. Whether it’s remote work, online shopping, online learning or remote health care, new methods and changes in consumer behaviors will likely continue after the virus has run its course. Internet gambling is another area that may soon see a COVID-19 bump. Most states do not allow internet gambling. Of the 44 states with lotteries, only 11 allow some form of internet play, either permitting lottery tickets to be sold over the internet or offering online lottery subscriptions. Of the 25 states with commercial casino gambling, internet gambling (that is, traditional casino games played electronically over the internet, usually distinct from online sports betting) is only available in Delaware, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Michigan and West Virginia have recently legalized iGaming but are not yet offering it. While there are only a handful of states that have considered iGaming or iLottery measures during coronavirus-dominated 2020 sessions, there are signs that a shift may be underway. One of the primary reasons that legal gambling has been slow to embrace the internet despite a sizable online gambling black market, is a fear that online gambling would rob brick-and-mortar casinos and surrounding establishments of visitors and revenue. This fear no longer appears to be widespread across the casino industry, and many stakeholders now point to evidence that internet gambling will actually help casinos. Those who are more inclined to bet online tend to be younger and are not necessarily active casinogoers; iGaming may offer an opportunity to appeal to a broader market. -
Sports Betting Update: a Report on the Status of Play
Sports Betting Update: A Report on the Status of Play Released June 14, 2021 MASSACHUSETTS GAMING COMMISSION Crystal Howard, Program Manager POST-PASPA AND POST-PANDEMIC UPDATE (AS OF MAY 18, 2021) Introduction The Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC) was created upon the adoption of “An Act Establishing Expanded Gaming in the Commonwealth” in November of 2011. The Commission, a five-member independent body, is tasked with implementing the Act and regulating the licensed gaming establishments. The Expanded Gaming Act allows for up to three destination resort casinos located in three geographically diverse regions across the state and a single slots facility for one location statewide. The Gaming Commission, at this time, has awarded the slots only license and two of the three integrated resort licenses. Each resort casino paid an $85 million licensing fee and was required to make a capital investment of at least $500 million – a requirement that both licensees substantially exceeded. The Commonwealth receives 25% of their gross gaming revenues. The slots facility paid a $25 million license fee, exceeded a required minimum capital investment of $125 million, and is taxed on 49% of its gross gaming revenue. As of this date, the Commonwealth has collected approximately $767 million in total taxes and assessments from Plainridge Park Casino1, MGM Springfield, and Encore Boston Harbor. This paper is intended to update the MGC’s 2018 publication on sports betting. Similarly, it does not represent an adopted position of the Commission. Rather it offers a fact-based report on the status of legalized sports wagering across the nation. Post-PASPA Status of Sports Betting The sports betting landscape has evolved rapidly since the decision which overturned the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (“PASPA”) in Murphy v. -
DEMAND for LOTTERY GAMBLING: Evaluating Price Sensitivity Within a Portfolio of LOTTERY Games
National Tax Journal, September 2014, 67 (3), 595–620 DEMAND FOR LOTTERY GAMBLING: EvALuATING pRIcE sENsITIvITY wIThIN A pORTFOLIO OF LOTTERY GAMEs Michael A. Trousdale and Richard A. Dunn This article introduces a new approach to analyzing whether lottery games are complements or substitutes, and whether a portfolio of lottery games is optimally priced. We estimate Barten’s synthetic differential demand system for the on-line lottery games operated by the Texas Lottery Commission. The demand system ap- proach imposes theory-consistent demand restrictions that allow identifcation of parameters for games without price variation. We use the estimated parameters from the Barten model to construct expenditure and price elasticities. Results indi- cate that on-line games in Texas are generally substitutes for one another and the portfolio of games is not priced to maximize proft. Keywords: gambling, lottery, consumer demand, elasticity, demand system esti- mation, Barten synthetic demand system JEL Codes: D12, H21, H27, H71, L83 I. INTRODUCTION roceeds from lottery gambling are a signifcant source of revenue for U.S. state Pgovernments. As of 2012, all but seven states operate or sponsor lottery gambling with total sales of $68.7 billion and profts of $19.4 billion.1 In Texas, lottery gambling provides more revenue than excise taxes on alcohol or cigarettes, accounting for approxi- mately 2 percent of total tax revenue (Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, 2010). Although lottery games serve as a form of entertainment, they are established frst and foremost as a source of revenue for the jurisdictions that operate them. A number of studies estimate the elasticity of total sales with respect to effective price to investigate whether a lottery game maximizes expected proft (Cook and Clotfelter, 1993; Gulley and Scott, 1993; Scoggins, 1995; Farrell, Morgenroth, and Walker, 1999; 1 See “Lottery Sales and Transfers,” North American Association of State and Provincial Lotteries, http:// www.naspl.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=content&menuid=17&pageid=1025. -
Annual Report 2016 Staatliche Toto-Lotto Gmbh Baden-Württemberg
Annual Report 2016 Staatliche Toto-Lotto GmbH Baden-Württemberg Premium-Annahmestelle Staatliche Toto-Lotto GmbH Baden-Württemberg Nordbahnhofstraße 201 70191 Stuttgart, Germany Telephone: +49 711-81 000-0 Telefax: +49 711-81 000-40 [email protected] www.lotto-bw.de www.spielen-mit-verantwortung.de 2 Annual Report 2016 Staatliche Toto-Lotto GmbH Baden-Württemberg Staatliche Toto-Lotto GmbH Baden-Württemberg Annual Report 2016 1 Table of contents 1 Table of contents 2 Foreword 4 Business development 2016 6 Overview of gaming types 6 LOTTO 6aus49 6 Eurojackpot 7 Spiel 77 and SUPER 6 8 KENO and plus 5 8 Silvester-Millionen 9 GlücksSpirale 9 Sieger-Chance 10 TOTO 10 ODDSET 10 Instant lotteries 11 Balance sheet of winners 12 Lottery funding 14 Responsible Gaming 16 Lotto online 18 Lotto Baden-Württemberg on social media 19 Information processing 20 Customer service 21 Sales organisation 22 Employee development 23 Corporate communication 24 Memberships and certificates 25 Sustainability 26 History of the company 28 Organs of the Company Legal Notice 2 Annual Report 2016 Staatliche Toto-Lotto GmbH Baden-Württemberg Staatliche Toto-Lotto GmbH Baden-Württemberg Annual Report 2016 3 Foreword Dear Readers, 2016 was a year of high-intensity work for Lotto lottery‘s special feature is that it guarantees Successful relaunch Baden-Württemberg. After an eventful jubilee a prize of Euro 100,000 every week, exclusively of the homepage year, we concentrated on the core business in Baden-Württemberg. www.lotto-bw.de in 2016 and set the direction for the future. The Lotto Academy, close to Freiburg, was Stakes in Baden-Württemberg increased by opened at the start of the year. -
The History of Lotteries
The History of Lotteries Gerald Willmann Department of Economics, Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6072, U.S.A. [email protected] August 3, 1999 Abstract In this pap er wegiveanoverview of the history of lotteries. Start- ing from early evidence in the Bible and in the classical Roman world, th we trace lotteries up to their reapp earance in Europ e in the 15 cen- tury. From that period onwards, lotteries b ecame so numerous that we concentrate on a few exemplary cases: the old French lottery, early lotteries in New York, and lotteries in the German states. Finally,we give a brief account of more recent developments and discuss some related issues. JEL: B15, B25, D80, G29, H27, N4. 1 1 Intro duction Lotteries have a long history. Their use is do cumented in the Old Testament, and several Roman emp erors used them for entertainment. They reapp ear th in Europ e in the 15 century mainly as a means to raise revenue for the state. Since then they have survived all opp osition. From an economic viewp oint, lotteries are interesting for at least two reasons. First, the fact that p eople buy lottery tickets presents achallenge to the theory of decision making under uncertainty. The prevalent Exp ected Utilityhyp othesis cannot 1 explain this phenomenon satisfactorily. Second, lotteries are an imp ortant source of revenue for the state. If we lo ok at the voluminous literature on tari s in international trade and note that lotteries often contribute more to the state budget than tari s, we can only wonder why the economic literature has remained so silent on this issue. -
European Parliament European Court of Justice
European Tax Report Confédération Fiscale Européenne (CFE) April 2009 / Edition 4 NEWS - INDIRECT TAX European Court of Justice European Parliament Universal postal service exempt from VAT (Case C-357/07) MEPs support actions to improve The ECJ ruled in its decision made on 23 April 2009 fight against VAT fraud l that the universal postal service carried out by the British Royal Mail is exempt from VAT insofar as On 24 April, the European Parliament adopted the this operator provides postal services in response advisory report of Cornelis Visser (EPP-ED, Nether- to the essential needs of the British population. The lands) on changes to the “VAT directive” (2006/112/ ECJ notes, however, that the Royal Mail is subject to EC) to fight more effectively against VAT fraud linked VAT when it provides individually negotiated provisi- to intra-Community imports. The report supports the ons of service. Commission's proposal to toughen up VAT exemption conditions when imports of goods are followed by a As Royal Mail before was the only universal postal transfer to another Member State, and to make the service provider in the UK it was obliged to provide a provider carrying out the intra-Community operations universal postal service. From 2006, the postal mar- liable for losses in VAT revenue caused by its custo- ket in the UK was fully liberalised, without affecting mer to the Member State of destination when the said the status and obligations of Royal Mail. The conve- provider has not made any declaration or has provi- yance by Royal Mail of postal packets and letters is ded incomplete or erroneous data. -
68 I-CHING Index # Australia New Zealand United States UK Malaysia
World Lottery game #s V24 Bulgaria South Africa current as of 05/24/2021. 14 6/49 14 Lotto 6/49 Gam e # GAME 34 6/42 28 Powerball 5/45 & 1/20 0 Dice 55 5/35 3 Oz Lotto 7/45 1 Coin toss 37 Pick 3 3/(0-9) 2 Keno 1-20 #S from 1-80 Croatia 5 Xlotto 6/45 62 Euro Jackpot 5/50 2/10 16 Hrvatska Loto 7/39 40 Super66 6/(0-6) dup alowed 68 I-CHING index # 17 Hrvatska Loto 6/45 65 Set for life 8/37 Australia Denmark 66 Keno coin toss 1/ (0-2) 3 Oz Lotto 7/45 24 Danish Lotto 7/36 & 1/16 South Korea 4 Powerball 7/35 - 1/20 20 Viking Lotto 6/48 5 Lotto 6/45 5 Superdraw 6/45 Spain 5 South Wales Lotto 6/45 Estonia/Latvia/Lithuania 14 La Primitiva 6/49 5 Gold Lotto 6/45 20 Viking Lotto 6/48 Sweden 7 Tatts Lotto 6/40 Finland 31 Lotto 7/35 40 Super66 6 [0-6] dup allowed 16 Lotto 7/39 20 Viking Lotto 6/48 37 Cash 3 3 [0-9] dup allowed 20 Viking Lotto 6/48 Switzerland 59 Set for Life 7/44 France 32 Lotto 6/42 & 1/6 New Zealand 57 Loto 5/49 & 1/10 Taiwan 6 Big Wednesday 6/50+ 0,1,or 2 Germany 58 Taiwan Super Lotto 6/38 + 1/8 7 NZ Lotto 6/40 25 Lotto 7/49 & 1/9 (0-9) 14 Taiwan lotto 6/49 8 NZ Powerball 6/40 - 1/10 14 Lotto 6/49 Turkey United States Greece 14 Lotto 6/49 9 *** U.S. -
Lotteries in Slovakia. the Business Legislation in the Lotteries Segment and Selected Slovakia’S Region Population’S Relationship to Gambling
ADIKTOLOGIE 125 Lotteries in Slovakia. The Business Legislation in the Lotteries Segment and Selected Slovakia’s Region Population’s Relationship to Gambling METZKER, Z.1, STREIMIKIS, J.2,3 1 | Tomas Bata University, Faculty of Management and Economics, Zlín, Citation | Metzker, Z., Streimikis, J. (2020). Lotteries in Slovakia. The Business Czech Republic Legislation in the Lotteries Segment and Selected Slovakia’s Region Population’s 2 | The University of Economics and Human Science in Warsaw, Poland Relationship to Gambling. Adiktologie, 20(3–4), 125–135; 3 | Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, Vilnius, Lithuania doi 10.35198/01-2020-002-0006 BACKGROUND: Lotteries are probably the most emerged from the research. The questionnaire’s possible geographically widespread and one of the most profitable reach was 7,537 people during the one-month data types of gambling in terms of revenue in the selected collection, with the return of 129 (1.71%) responses. In country. Players in Slovakia can place a bet in 9 lotteries, total, 33.3% of respondents take part in gambling, 20% of including additional games. AIMS: The main goal of this respondents place bets in lotteries (60.5% of gamblers) paper is to present potential conditions for the development and the most common form of placing a bet is through of lottery business in the Slovak Republic, including legal a terminal (80.8% of players) – in a facility. There are definitions of lottery types, legislative restrictions and state no significant statistical differences in terms of the regulation. A separate part of the paper is dedicated to respondents’ geographical domicile on the frequency analysing the results of a questionnaire research aimed at of gambling, participation in any types of games or the finding out the preferences of selected types of gambling.