DOCSLIB.ORG

Vegetation Mediates Foraging, Trophic Cascades, and Biological Control by Omnivorous Weed Seed Predators Carmen K Blubaugh Purdue University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vegetation Mediates Foraging, Trophic Cascades, and Biological Control by Omnivorous Weed Seed Predators Carmen K Blubaugh Purdue University Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Open Access Dissertations Theses and Dissertations Spring 2015 Undercover predators: Vegetation mediates foraging, trophic cascades, and biological control by omnivorous weed seed predators Carmen K Blubaugh Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Blubaugh, Carmen K, "Undercover predators: Vegetation mediates foraging, trophic cascades, and biological control by omnivorous weed seed predators" (2015). Open Access Dissertations. 425. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/425 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Graduate School Form 30 Updated 1/15/2015 PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL Thesis/Dissertation Acceptance This is to certify that the thesis/dissertation prepared By Carmen K. Blubaugh Entitled Undercover Predators: Vegetation Mediates Foraging, Trophic Cascades, and Biological Control by Omnivoroius Weed Seed Predators For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Is approved by the final examining committee: Ian Kaplan Chair Clifford Sadof Douglas Richmond Kevin Gibson To the best of my knowledge and as understood by the student in the Thesis/Dissertation Agreement, Publication Delay, and Certification Disclaimer (Graduate School Form 32), this thesis/dissertation adheres to the provisions of Purdue University’s “Policy of Integrity in Research” and the use of copyright material. Approved by Major Professor(s): Ian Kaplan Steve Yaninek 4/29/2015 Approved by: Head of the Departmental Graduate Program Date UNDERCOVER PREDATORS: VEGETATION MEDIATES FORAGING, TROPHIC CASCADES, AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL BY OMNIVOROUS WEED SEED PREDATORS A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Carmen K. Blubaugh In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2015 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana ii To Philip Keeney, Rosie Kaplan and Grandma Midge iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am infinitely grateful to my advisor, Ian Kaplan, for adeptly guiding and supporting my development as a scholar. In addition to helping me cultivate a creative research program, his example helped me demonstrate the tenacity, resourcefulness, and resilience that are prerequisites for success in academia. Thanks to my committee, Kevin Gibson, Doug Richmond, and Cliff Sadof, for bringing me to earth when I attempted unmanageable feats, and also for embracing some of my crazier ideas. Thanks to the Kaplan labmates for being the best friends, rough draft editors, emergency field assistants, and baked-good producers. Thanks to many technicians (Michelle Lee, Gareth Powell, Curt Hardin, Ivy Widick, and Christie Shee) for assistance with often-ridiculous, excruciating tasks. Thanks to my collaborators, James Hagler and Scott Machtley, for patience and guidance during my first molecular lab experience. Thanks to Rob Swihart and Patrick Zollner for helping me integrate small mammal ecology in my work. To several scholars outside Purdue (Adam Davis, Brent Danielson, Jon Lundgren, and John Orrock) who graciously answered my random emails and phone calls, providing priceless advice. And to Ken Kellner for being a patient statistics teacher, error message trouble- shooter, and steadfast friend. Finally, thanks to my parents for financial assistance, field assistance, and assistance with survival during my tenure as a graduate student. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... viii ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ x CHAPTER 1. A META-ANALYSIS OF SEASONAL DYNAMICS AND SPECIES- SPECIFIC IMPACTS OF WEED SEED BIOLOGICAL CONTROL BY VERTEBRATE AND INVERTEBRATE SEED PREDATORS ...................................... 1 1.1 ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Seed predator taxa: .......................................................................................... 3 1.2.2 Environmental resources: ................................................................................... 4 1.3 METHODS ................................................................................................................ 5 1.3.1 Literature search .............................................................................................. 5 1.3.2 Data collection ................................................................................................. 6 1.3.3 Statistical analysis ............................................................................................ 7 1.4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................... 8 1.4.1 Seasonal variation: ........................................................................................... 8 1.4.2 Crop environment: ......................................................................................... 10 1.4.3 Seed preference: ............................................................................................. 11 1.4.4 Conclusions and synthesis: ............................................................................ 12 1.5 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ 14 CHAPTER 2. TILLAGE COMPROMISES WEED SEED PREDATOR ACTIVITY ACROSS DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES ....................................................................... 28 2.1 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................ 28 v Page 2.2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 29 2.3 METHODS .............................................................................................................. 31 2.2.1 Experiment 1 .................................................................................................. 31 2.2.2 Experiment 2 .................................................................................................. 33 2.2.3 Statistical Analyses ........................................................................................ 35 2.3 RESULTS ................................................................................................................ 37 2.3.1 Larval activity phenology .............................................................................. 37 2.3.2 Experiment 1 .................................................................................................. 37 2.3.3 Experiment 2 .................................................................................................. 38 2.4 DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................... 38 2.5 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ 43 CHAPTER 3. COVER CROPS PROMOTE AGGREGATION OF OMNIVOROUS PREDATORS IN SEED PATCHES AND FACILITATE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL . 56 3.1 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................ 56 3.2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 57 3.3 METHODS .............................................................................................................. 60 3.3.1 Study system .................................................................................................. 60 3.3.2 Field sampling ............................................................................................... 61 3.3.3 Gut content analysis ....................................................................................... 62 3.3.4 Protein mark retention trial ............................................................................ 63 3.3.5 Statistical analysis .......................................................................................... 63 3.4 RESULTS ................................................................................................................ 64 3.4.1 Pitfall sampling .............................................................................................. 64 3.4.2 Gut content analysis ....................................................................................... 65 3.5 DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................... 66 3.6 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ 69 CHAPTER 4. DOES FEAR BEGET FEAR? MOONLIGHT AND HABITAT COMPLEXITY MEDIATE INTRAGUILD PREDATION AND NONCONSUMPTIVE EFFECTS OVER FOUR TROPHIC LEVELS ................................................................ 84 vi Page 4.1 ABSTRACT ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abstracts from the 1999 Symposium
    UTAH I THE I DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL ARIZONA NEVADA l I i I / + S v'LEI S % A|. w a CALIFORNIA PROCEEDINGS OF 1999 SYMPOSIUM DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1999 SYMPOSIUM A compilation of reports and papers presented at the twenty-fourth annual symposium of the Desert Tortoise Council, March 5-8, 1999 St. George, Utah PUBLICATIONS OF THE DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL, INC. Members Non-members Proceedings of the 1976 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1977 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1978 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1979 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1980 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1981 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1982 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1983 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1984 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1985 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1986 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1987-91 Desert Tortoise Council Symposia $20,00 $20.00 Proceedings of the 1992 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1993 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1994 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1995 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1996 Desert Tortoise Council Symposium $10.00 $15.00 Proceedings of the 1997-98 Desert Tortoise Council Symposia $10.00 $15.00 Annotated Bibliog raphy of the Desert Tortoise, Gopherus agassizii $10.00 $15.00 Note: Please add $1.00 per copy to cover postage and handling.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Fragment Size and Microhabitat Effects on Palm Seed Predation
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 131 (2006) 1– 13 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Forest fragment size and microhabitat effects on palm seed predation Marina Fleurya,b,c,*, Mauro Galettib,c aLaborato´rio de Ecologia e Restaurac¸a˜ o Florestal (LERF), Escola Superior de Agricultura ‘‘Luiz de Queiroz’’, Universidade de Sa˜ o Paulo (ESALQ/USP), Brazil bLaborato´rio de Biologia da Conservac¸a˜ o, Grupo de Fenologia e Dispersa˜ o de Sementes, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), C.P. 199, 13506-900, Rio Claro, Sa˜ o Paulo, Brazil cInstituto de Biologia da Conservac¸a˜ o (IBC), Av.P-13, 293, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The establishment of plant species depends crucially on where the seeds are deposited. How- Received 11 January 2005 ever, since most studies have been conducted in continuous forests, not much is known about Received in revised form the effects of forest fragmentation on the maintenance of abiotic and biotic characteristics in 19 October 2005 microhabitats and their effects on seed survival. In this study, we evaluated the effects of for- Accepted 24 October 2005 est fragmentation on the predation upon the seeds of the palm Syagrus romanzoffiana in three Available online 3 April 2006 microhabitats (interior forest, forest edge and gaps) in eight fragments of semi-deciduous Atlantic forest ranging in size from 9.5 ha to 33,845 ha in southeastern Brazil. Specifically, Keywords: we examined the influence of the microhabitat structure, fauna and fragment size on the pat- Arecaceae tern of seed predation.
    [Show full text]
  • Osservazioni Sulla Dieta E Cenni Sulla Bionomia Del Genere Harpalus LATREILLE
    © Naturwiss.-med. Ver. Innsbruck; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Ber. nat.-med. Verein Innsbruck Band 78 S. 145 - 155 Innsbruck, Okt. 1991 Osservazioni sulla dieta e cenni sulla bionomia del genere Harpalus LATREILLE (Coleoptera, Carabidae) di Fulvia BERTRANDI e Tullia ZETTO BRANDMAYR *) Diet preferences and bionomy of Harpalus LATR. s.str. (Coleoptera, Carabidae) Synopsis: The majority of Carabid Beetles are predators and carnivores. Exceptions are found in some tribes, especially in the Harpalinae: the genus Ophonus seems to be exclusively spermophagous (= seed-eating). Frequently, many exceptions have been termed "phytophagous", a too general term (true spermophagy or occa- sional consumption of green parts of plant?). Although the genus Harpalus seems to have a polyphagous diet (seed- eating and prédation), little was known about dietary preferences of Harpalus s. str., especially of its larvae. Five species of Harpalus were bred successfully both under laboratory (20 - 25°C, LD : 15/9) and natural con- dition: in all species, growth, moults and pupation were observed, both on a protein diet (minced meat or Tenebrio larvae or grasshoppers) and on an exclusively spermophagous diet. The seed-diet seems to increase the survival rate and the propagation rhythm. The five species were shown to be polyphagous: in natural habitats they may be- have both as predators and as primary consumers. Since the larvae develope in 2-3 months, without dormancy, Harpalus is probably a spring-breeder with summer-larvae. Harpalus species aggregate in crops because of their more opportunistic feeding habits, whereas Ophonus are typical of Daucus-rich open and abandoned habitats. Introduzione: I Coleotteri Carabidi, pur essendo considerati carnivori e predatori per eccellenza, presentano un notevole numero di eccezioni per quanto riguarda la loro dieta.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Predator Satiation on Seed Predation in New Roadside Prairie Plantings
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Dissertations and Theses @ UNI Student Work 2016 Effects of predator satiation on seed predation in new roadside prairie plantings Jessica Riebkes University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2016 Jessica Riebkes Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Riebkes, Jessica, "Effects of predator satiation on seed predation in new roadside prairie plantings" (2016). Dissertations and Theses @ UNI. 277. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/277 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses @ UNI by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright by JESSICA L. RIEBKES 2016 All Rights Reserved EFFECTS OF PREDATOR SATIATION ON SEED PREDATION IN NEW ROADSIDE PRAIRIE PLANTINGS An Abstract of a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Jessica Riebkes University of Northern Iowa May 2016 ABSTRACT Restoration efforts in the tallgrass prairie ecosystem are inhibited by high seed cost and as little as 10% emergence of planted, pure live seed. This study examined the portion of loss due to seed predation and sought to reduce this predation in new roadside prairie plantings. Studies document the occurrence of predation in several plant communities and across all plant families, but little is known about how to reduce the impact of seed predators, especially in a restoration setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Abella, S. R. 2010. Disturbance and plant succession in the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts of the American Southwest. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7:1248—1284. Abella, S. R., D. J. Craig, L. P. Chiquoine, K. A. Prengaman, S. M. Schmid, and T. M. Embrey. 2011. Relationships of native desert plants with red brome (Bromus rubens): Toward identifying invasion-reducing species. Invasive Plant Science and Management 4:115—124. Abella, S. R., N. A. Fisichelli, S. M. Schmid, T. M. Embrey, D. L. Hughson, and J. Cipra. 2015. Status and management of non-native plant invasion in three of the largest national parks in the United States. Nature Conservation 10:71—94. Available: https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.10.4407 Abella, S. R., A. A. Suazo, C. M. Norman, and A. C. Newton. 2013. Treatment alternatives and timing affect seeds of African mustard (Brassica tournefortii), an invasive forb in American Southwest arid lands. Invasive Plant Science and Management 6:559—567. Available: https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00022.1 Abrahamson, I. 2014. Arctostaphylos manzanita. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Fire Effects Information System (Online). plants/shrub/arcman/all.html Ackerman, T. L. 1979. Germination and survival of perennial plant species in the Mojave Desert. The Southwestern Naturalist 24:399—408. Adams, A. W. 1975. A brief history of juniper and shrub populations in southern Oregon. Report No. 6. Oregon State Wildlife Commission, Corvallis, OR. Adams, L. 1962. Planting depths for seeds of three species of Ceanothus.
    [Show full text]
  • Its Breadth of Effectiveness Against Predators J
    J. Appl. Entomol. Haemolymph defence of an invasive herbivore: its breadth of effectiveness against predators J. G. Lundgren1, S. Toepfer2,3, T. Haye2 & U. Kuhlmann2 1 USDA-ARS, North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, Brookings, SD, USA 2 CABI Europe-Switzerland, Delemont, Switzerland 3 CABI Europe, c/o Plant Health Service, CABI Europe, Hodmezovasarhely, Hungary Keywords Abstract Tetramorium caespitum, Zea mays, biological control, Carabidae, diel cycle, Lycosidae Defensive characteristics of organisms affect the trophic linkages within food webs and influence the ability of invasive species to expand their Correspondence range. Diabrotica v. virgifera is one such invasive herbivore whose preda- Jonathan Lundgren (corresponding author), tor community is restricted by a larval haemolymph defence. The effec- NCARL, USDA-ARS, 2923 Medary Avenue, tiveness of this haemolymph defence against a range of predator Brookings, SD, USA. E-mail: functional and taxonomic guilds from the recipient biota was evaluated [email protected] in a series of experiments. Eight predator species (Carabidae, Lycosidae, Received: August 5, 2009; accepted: October Formicidae) were fed D. v. virgifera 3rd instars or equivalent-sized mag- 28, 2009. gots in the laboratory, and the mean times spent eating, cleaning their mouthparts, resting and walking following attacks on each prey were doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01478.x compared. Prey species were restrained in five Hungarian maize fields for 1 h periods beginning at 09:00 and 22:00 hours. The proportion of each species attacked and the number and identity of predators consum- ing each prey item were recorded. All predators spent less time eating D.
    [Show full text]
  • Structuring Habitat to Conserve Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and Reduce Summer Annual Weeds in Agroecosystems
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Jessica M. Green for the degree of Master of Science in Horticulture presented on October 22, 2010. Title: Structuring Habitat to Conserve Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and Reduce Summer Annual Weeds in Agroecosystems Abstract approved: ____________________________________________________________________________ R. Edward Peachey Weed management in sustainable farming systems often requires the integration of several different pest management techniques. Cultural, biological, and chemical pest control efforts can be utilized to contribute to the common goal of reducing weeds in vegetable row crop systems. This research addresses how common disturbances such as tillage and insecticide use affect: carabid beetle assemblages; predation of weed seeds by invertebrates; and weed seed recruitment. Field experiments were conducted over three years at two different locations on the OSU Vegetable Research Farm, Linn Co., OR. We found that activity-density of carabid beetles varied seasonally and peaked in late August- September each year. Insecticide applied in year 1 affected seed loss in year 2, suggesting possible long-term effects of land management on weed seed removal. Weed recruitment was highly variable between treatment, site, and year. Conserving biological weed control agents in combination with cultural techniques such as reducing tillage and the use of cover crops, helps growers shift from expensive, density-independent control efforts to more ecological, long-term solutions for weed management in agroecosystems. © Copyright by Jessica M. Green October 22, 2010 All Rights Reserved Structuring Habitat to Conserve Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and Reduce Summer Annual Weeds in Agroecosystems by Jessica M. Green A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Presented October 22, 2010 Commencement June 2011 Master of Science thesis of Jessica M.
    [Show full text]
  • Deterring Rodent Seed-Predation Using Seed-Coating Technologies Justin B
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Deterring rodent seed-predation using seed-coating technologies Justin B. Taylor1,2 , Kristina L. Cass1, David N. Armond1, Matthew D. Madsen1 , Dean E. Pearson3,4 , Samuel B. St. Clair1 With many degraded environments undergoing restoration efforts, there is a growing need for the optimization of direct seed- ing practices. Seeds planted on wildlands are often consumed by rodents, leading to reduced plant establishment. Coating seeds in rodent aversive products may prevent seed-predation. We tested 10 seed-coating formulations containing products expected to deter rodents, namely: ghost and cayenne pepper powders; essential oils from bergamot, neem, and pine; methyl-nonyl- ketone, anthraquinone, activated carbon, beta-cyclodextrin, and a blank coating containing no rodent deterrents to serve as a control treatment. Each treatment was applied to Pseudoroegneria spicata (bluebunch wheatgrass) seeds. These seeds germi- nated similarly to uncoated control seeds unless the coating contained methyl-nonyl-ketone which reduced germination. When seeds were offered to Ord’s kangaroo rats (Dipodomys ordii), they strongly avoided the treatments in favor of uncoated control seeds. Notably, the blank coating, lacking active ingredients, still elicited 99% avoidance. However, these results indicated behavior when alternative food sources are readily available, a scenario rare in nature. To address this, a second feeding exper- iment was conducted to observe D. ordii’s behavior under calorie-restricted conditions. D. ordii were subjected to a fast period, then offered only one treatment. Under these conditions, many subjects chose to consume coated seeds, but to a lesser degree than subjects offered control seeds. Seeds coated in ghost pepper, neem oil, and activated carbon reduced consumption by 47–50%.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Beetles: Warriors on Your Farm
    Fact Sheet 2018-01 Ground Beetles: Warriors on Your Farm Gladis Zinati1,*, Ph.D., Director of Vegetable Systems Trial Andrew Smith1, Ph.D., Chief Scientist Joe Ingerson-Mahar2, Ph.D., Vegetable IPM Program Coordinator 1Rodale Institute, 611 Siegfriedale Road, Kutztown, PA 19530 2Rutgers University, 104 Thompson Hall, 96 Lipman Dr.,New Brunswick, NJ 08901 *Contact information Email: [email protected] Many vegetable growers choose to use Life Cycle pesticides to keep pests from destroying their vegetable crops. Instead, farmers Ground beetles pass through four life stages: should consider the safe and sustainable egg, larva, pupa and adult. Eggs are laid in alternative: encouraging and enhancing moist soil. Upon hatching, the larvae dwell populations of pests’ natural enemies. in the soil. Larvae are elongated, and their Ground beetles (a.k.a. carabid beetles or heads are relatively large with distinct carabids) are a naturally-occurring pest mandibles. Larvae feed on soft-bodied, soil- control. dwelling insects and their eggs for two to four weeks, then pupate. Most species This fact sheet provides a quick guide to complete their life cycle from egg to adult in carabid beetles as beneficial insects that can one year. Adults overwinter in the soil and be populated on your farm. With good emerge again in the spring. management, they will become the warriors that feed on pests. Appreciating Ground Beetles Ground beetles are a diverse group of insects with 2,000 species inhabiting North America. They typically live in the soil and are usually active at night. Adult ground beetles range in size from about 1/8 inch to Harpalus pensylvanicus Chlaenius tricolor 1 ¼ inch (2mm to over 35mm).
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached Copy Is Furnished to the Author for Internal Non-Commerci
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Biological Control 57 (2011) 229–235 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Control journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Plant versus prey resources: Influence on omnivore behavior and herbivore suppression ⇑ Steven D. Frank , Paula M. Shrewsbury, Robert F. Denno University of Maryland, Department of Entomology, 4112 Plant Sciences Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA article info abstract Article history: Conservation biological control tactics, such as beetle banks, that increase habitat complexity generally Received 3 November 2010 increase epigeal predator abundance. Habitat complexity also increases alternative food which can Accepted 9 March 2011 attract and sustain predators but may reduce predation of target pests. Our goal was to determine Available online 15 March 2011 how alternative food from different trophic levels (fly pupae and seeds) affects behavior and biological control efficacy of omnivorous carabid beetles. Seed subsidies increased omnivorous carabid abundance Keywords: more than pupae by increasing aggregation and reducing emigration.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) from Quantico Marine Corps Base, Virginia
    Banisteria, Number 6, 1995 © 1995 by the Virginia Natural History Society Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from Quantico Marine Corps Base, Virginia 2 John M. Anderson\ Joseph C. Mitchelf, Adrienne A. HaU , Richard L. Hoffman! IVirginia Museum of Narural History, Martinsville, Virginia 24112 2Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia 23173 Ground beetles (carabids) comprise a dominant tion. The present paper provides a baseline checklist of element in the terrestrial insect fauna in many parts of the the 78 species of ground beetles collected, with emphasis world. Diverse in species, abundant in individual on overall and local distribution. numbers, and adapted to a wide variety of biotopes, these Since no locality in the Commonwealth has yet been lI beetles provide a valuable resource for srudies in ecology, thoroughly inventoried with respect to carabids, it is diffi­ ! distribution, and evolutionary processes. cult to relate the Quantico fauna to that in other parts of With approximately 453 species of carabids now re­ the state. Two srudies have been conducted during preda­ corded (Da"idson, 1995), this family holds first place in a tory insect inventories in crop fields (soy beans, alfalfa), numerical ranking of Virginia's beetle groups. A large one of them in Rockbridge County (Los & Allen, 1983), number of the species are, however, known from only one the other in Westmoreland County (Ferguson & or two localities, and existing information on both geo­ McPherson, 1985). i\lthough both investigations utilized graphic and seasonal occurrence is strikingly deficient. a pitfall (can trap) technique, they sampled the beetles of a A srudy of the terrestrial animaL.;; of the Marine Corps biotope which, if not atypical for carabids, is not directly Combat Development Command, Quantico, Virginia was comparable to the chiefly woodland habitats surveyed at conducted by the second author during the fall of 1990 Quantico.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Ebony Jewelwing Damsel
    Comp. Parasitol. 71(2), 2004, pp. 141–153 Calyxocephalus karyopera g. nov., sp. nov. (Eugregarinorida: Actinocephalidae: Actinocephalinae) from the Ebony Jewelwing Damselfly Calopteryx maculata (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae) in Southeast Nebraska, U.S.A.: Implications for Mechanical Prey–Vector Stabilization of Exogenous Gregarine Development RICHARD E. CLOPTON Department of Natural Science, Peru State College, Peru, Nebraska 68421, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT: Calyxocephalus karyopera g. nov., sp. nov. (Apicomplexa: Eugregarinorida: Actinocephalidae: Actino- cephalinae) is described from the Ebony Jewelwing Damselfly Calopteryx maculata (Odonata: Zygoptera: Calopteryigidae) collected along Turkey Creek in Johnson County, Nebraska, U.S.A. Calyxocephalus gen. n. is distinguished by the form of the epimerite complex: a terminal thick disk or linearly crateriform sucker with a distal apopetalus calyx of petaloid lobes and a short intercalating diamerite (less than half of the total holdfast length). The epimerite complex is conspicuous until association and syzygy. Association occurs immediately before syzygy and is cephalolateral and biassociative. Gametocysts are spherical with a conspicuous hyaline coat. Lacking conspicuous sporoducts they dehisce by simple rupture. Oocysts are axially symmetric, hexagonal dipyramidic in shape with slight polar truncations, bearing 6 equatorial spines, 1 at each equatorial vertex and 6 terminal spines obliquely inserted at each pole, 1 at each vertex created by polar truncation. The ecology of the C. karyopera–C. maculata host–parasite system provides a mechanism for mechanical prey–vector stabilization of exogenous gregarine development and isolation. KEY WORDS: Odonata, Zygoptera, Calopteryx maculata, damselfly, Apicomplexa, Eugregarinida, Actinocephalidae, Actinocephalinae, Calyxocephalus karyopera, new genus, new species, parasite evolution, biodiversity, species isolation, vector, transmission.
    [Show full text]