The Protists

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Protists CHAPTER 35 Protists are a diverse group of eukaryotes 000 Where did eukaryotic cells come from? 000 The protists Origin of the nucleus 000 The endomembrane system: extension of the nuclear envelope 000 Mitochondria and plastids arose by endosymbiosis 000 he protists include a weird Cilia and flagella: extensions of the cytoskeleton 000 Are simple protists ancient eukaryotes? 000 Tand wonderful potpourri of Sponge-like protists 000 ‘Collar’ flagellates: choanoflagellates 000 eukaryotic organisms that few people Slime moulds 000 Cellular slime moulds 000 ever see. Most protists are single-celled organisms (unicellular) and Acellular slime moulds: myxomycetes 000 live in aquatic habitats. There are at least 100 000 species and new Parasitic flagellates that contaminate water supplies: diplomonads 000 ones are being discovered continually. Photosynthetic protists are Symbionts and parasites: parabasalids 000 Amoebae 000 major primary producers in lakes, rivers and oceans, and during Rhizopods are amoebae that can alter their shape 000 photosynthesis they release into the atmosphere at least 30% of the Actinopods are radially symmetrical unicells 000 Protists with plastids 000 planet’s oxygen. Herbivorous protists are the link in food chains Protists with primary plastids: the ‘green lineage’ 000 between algal primary producers and larger animal consumers, Missing links in endosymbiosis: glaucophytes 000 Red algae: rhodophytes 000 such as fishes and invertebrates. Parasitic protists are responsible for Green algae: chlorophytes 000 Applications Green algae and biotechnology 000 serious human diseases, such as malaria, sleeping sickness and certain Protistan pirates with second-hand plastids 000 types of dysentery. Protists also parasitise other animals and plants, Chromist protists: the ‘brown lineage’ 000 Flagellates with second-hand plastids: causing agricultural losses. cryptomonads 000 Golden flagellates: chrysophytes 000 The classification of protists is undergoing major changes as Chalk comes from dead algae: haptophytes 000 their relationships are still being discovered. Some groups that were Algae in glass houses: diatoms 000 Brown algae: phaeophytes 000 traditionally classified as ‘orders’ are now treated at a higher level—as Water moulds and downy mildews: oomycetes 000 Applications Dieback disease 000 new ‘phyla’. The protists are polyphyletic, including a number Alveolates: dinoflagellates, ciliates and parasites 000 of major lines of evolution; various types that were once classified Dinoflagellates: whirling algae 000 Small but deadly: apicocomplexans 000 together (such as the ‘algae’) are now known to be only distantly Research Malaria 000 Ciliates: eukaryotes with two different nuclei 000 related. Thus, in this chapter we will not use formal taxonomic Euglenoids and kinetoplasts 000 Euglenoid flagellates 000 names for the different groups until protistologists agree on a new Flagellate parasites: kinetoplasts 000 system of classification. Cercozoa and forams 000 Amoebae with second-hand chloroplasts: chlorarachniophytes 000 More chalky protists: forams 000 KKNOXNOX CCH35.inddH35.indd 883535 22/4/09/4/09 11:14:57:14:57 PPMM Protists are a diverse group of into kingdom Protista. However, it is patently obvious that there is no such kingdom, and many of its members are more eukaryotes closely related to other kingdoms than to each other. Green Protists are diverse. Comparing two protistan phyla is like algae, for example, are the closest relatives of land plants comparing elephants with mushrooms or eels with tomatoes. (Chapter 36), and choanoflagellates are an early offshoot on In the past, protists were grouped together based on their form the way to animals (Chapter 38). So why do we still put most of nutrition—whether they were autotrophic (able to pro- protists together in one chapter as though they were one evo- duce food by photosynthesis) or heterotrophic (consumers of lutionary lineage? The answer is partly historical and partly organic substances or other organisms). Photosynthetic protists practical. There are still groups of unicellular eukaryotes of were known as algae, protists that ate smaller organisms were unknown evolutionary relationships, some not even named. known as protozoa (simple animals), and some protists that For convenience, these organisms are temporarily grouped absorbed small food molecules from the environment were together under the banner of protists. The study of protists is considered to be fungi. at a very exciting stage; new insights are being made daily and It is now obvious that this system was far too simplistic. revolutionary changes are sweeping through the discipline of Numerous photosynthetic protists, for example, swim about protist research. like animals and even capture smaller cells and eat them. These organisms are both animal-like and plant-like and can- • Protists may be photosynthetic, parasitic, predatory or absorb not be classified on the basis of nutrition. A more natural clas- small food molecules from the environment. sification based on morphological, biochemical and molecular • Relationships among them are still unclear but they are a diverse features, particularly gene sequences, is now emerging. Most range of eukaryotic cell types, and the kingdom Protista is of the newly recognised natural groups include organisms with polyphyletic. various modes of nutrition. Alveolates (p. 000), for example, have photosynthetic, parasitic and predatory members, but all are close relatives based on comparison of the fine structural Where did eukaryotic cells come details of their cells and their DNA sequences. from? From the phylogenetic tree in Figure 35.1, you can see that protists are not a monophyletic group (Chapter 31). The oldest fossils of eukaryotic organisms do not appear until For a long time all protists have been collectively grouped about 1.4 billion years ago. Since fossils of prokaryotes are older The ‘primary lineage’ Fig. 35.1 Current view of the phylogeny of eukaryotes (super kingdom Eukarya). Everything other FUNGI red algae red amoebae ANIMALS than the three kingdoms fungi, parabasilids green algae green diplomonads glaucophytes animals and plants are protists. cryptomonads LAND PLANTS Several protist lineages are nearest choanoflagellates relatives to these more familiar actinopods, rhizopods fossils, eukaryotic kingdoms. Other protist 450 mya lineages form large groups, such as mycetozoa, slime moulds the chromists and the alveolates. fossils, 590 mya How these protist groups relate to fossils, one another is not yet clear so the 600 mya tree has a comb-like appearance to reflect this lack of understanding Precambrian fossils, Precambrian fossils, of the branching orders. Some 700 mya 900 mya groups are recorded in the fossil record and their ages are shown. The lineages that have plastids (e.g. photosynthetic chloroplasts or remnant non-photosynthetic organelles) are indicated on the Precambrian tree. Eukarya 1.5 billion years 836 Part 5 Evolution and biodiversity For further reading and revision KKNOXNOX CCH35.inddH35.indd 883636 22/4/09/4/09 11:14:57:14:57 PPMM (3.5 billion years ago), it is generally thought that eukaryotes The endomembrane system: extension of evolved from prokaryotic organisms. As we have seen in earlier chapters, prokaryotic and the nuclear envelope eukaryotic cells share many cellular processes but the internal The endomembrane system of eukaryotes forms a conduit layout of their cells is different. Prokaryotic cells are essentially from the nuclear envelope to various subcellular compartments one single compartment, whereas eukaryotic cells contain and also to the exterior of the cell via the plasma membrane. several membrane-bound subcompartments. How did these subcompartments originate? The answer turns out to be quite nucleoid (DNA) a surprise. Origin of the nucleus prokaryote The eukaryotic nucleus differs from the prokaryotic nucleoid in numerous respects. Two major distinctions are the nuclear envelope and the multiple linear chromosomes of eukaryotes (Chapter 8). Prokaryotes lack a nuclear envelope and usually have a single circular chromosome. Transformation from a circular chromosome to linear chromosomes might have arisen from a break in the circle and duplication of the linear chromo- endoplasmic reticulum some to give multiple copies. nuclear envelope The origin of the nuclear envelope can be explained by No extant the accumulation of vesicles resulting from the infolding descendants (invagination) of the cell membrane around the prokaryotic known nucleoid. If the vesicles flatten around the nucleoid, as shown in Figure 35.2, they form a rudimentary double envelope nucleated cell complete with gaps or nuclear pores. Such accumulations of membrane vesicles around the nucleoid are known to occur in certain cyanobacteria (Chapter 34). aerobic bacterial Chromists—the ‘brown lineage’ Alveolates endosymbiont mitochondrion Animals Fungi ciliates forams diatoms photosynthetic oomycetes euglenoids cercozoans bacterial kinetoplasts haptophytes chrysophytes phaeophytes endosymbiont cryptomonads dinoflagellates apicomplexans C H A P T E R 3 5 fossils, Cambrian 540 mya fossils, 540 mya chloroplast Precambrian fossils, Green algae 700 mya chromalveolates Plants Key primary plastid Fig. 35.2 The evolution of eukaryotic cells. The origin of secondary plastid the nucleus and endomembrane system. Mitochondria originated from an aerobic bacterial endosymbiont. Chloroplasts originated mya = million years ago from a photosynthetic
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Data and the Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Un
    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, 1993 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Botany We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2003 © Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria, 2003 ABSTRACT New sequences of ribosomal and protein genes were combined with available morphological and paleontological data to produce a phylogenetic framework for dinoflagellates. The evolutionary history of some of the major morphological features of the group was then investigated in the light of that framework. Phylogenetic trees of dinoflagellates based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) are generally poorly resolved but include many well- supported clades, and while combined analyses of SSU and LSU (large subunit ribosomal RNA) improve the support for several nodes, they are still generally unsatisfactory. Protein-gene based trees lack the degree of species representation necessary for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but do provide important insights to the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole and on the identity of their close relatives. Molecular data agree with paleontology in suggesting an early evolutionary radiation of the group, but whereas paleontological data include only taxa with fossilizable cysts, the new data examined here establish that this radiation event included all dinokaryotic lineages, including athecate forms. Plastids were lost and replaced many times in dinoflagellates, a situation entirely unique for this group. Histones could well have been lost earlier in the lineage than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology, Phylogeny, and Diversity of Trichonympha (Parabasalia: Hypermastigida) of the Wood-Feeding Cockroach Cryptocercus Punctulatus
    J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 56(4), 2009 pp. 305–313 r 2009 The Author(s) Journal compilation r 2009 by the International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00406.x Morphology, Phylogeny, and Diversity of Trichonympha (Parabasalia: Hypermastigida) of the Wood-Feeding Cockroach Cryptocercus punctulatus KEVIN J. CARPENTER, LAWRENCE CHOW and PATRICK J. KEELING Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Botany Department, University of British Columbia, University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 ABSTRACT. Trichonympha is one of the most complex and visually striking of the hypermastigote parabasalids—a group of anaerobic flagellates found exclusively in hindguts of lower termites and the wood-feeding cockroach Cryptocercus—but it is one of only two genera common to both groups of insects. We investigated Trichonympha of Cryptocercus using light and electron microscopy (scanning and transmission), as well as molecular phylogeny, to gain a better understanding of its morphology, diversity, and evolution. Microscopy reveals numerous new features, such as previously undetected bacterial surface symbionts, adhesion of post-rostral flagella, and a dis- tinctive frilled operculum. We also sequenced small subunit rRNA gene from manually isolated species, and carried out an environmental polymerase chain reaction (PCR) survey of Trichonympha diversity, all of which strongly supports monophyly of Trichonympha from Cryptocercus to the exclusion of those sampled from termites. Bayesian and distance methods support a relationship between Tricho- nympha species from termites and Cryptocercus, although likelihood analysis allies the latter with Eucomonymphidae. A monophyletic Trichonympha is of great interest because recent evidence supports a sister relationship between Cryptocercus and termites, suggesting Trichonympha predates the Cryptocercus-termite divergence.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Protists Video and DVD Guide. the BIOLOGY of PROTISTS Produced by Biomedia ASSOCIATES ©2003 -- Running Time 20 Minutes
    Biology of Protists video and DVD guide. THE BIOLOGY OF PROTISTS Produced by BioMEDIA ASSOCIATES ©2003 -- Running time 20 minutes. Order Toll Free (877) 661-5355 or FAX (843) 470-0237 Or mail orders to eBioMEDIA, P.O. Box 1234, Beaufort, SC 29901–1234 (IMAGES IN THIS GUIDE ARE FROM THE VIDEO PROGRAM) Cosmerium, a green alga Arcella, a shelled ameoba The goal of this program is to show a representative sample of the great diversity of protists, and to show why they need a new classification reflecting our growing understanding of their long evolutionary history. The protists shown can be found in habitats such as: roadside puddles, park duck ponds, aquariums, birdbaths and in the gut of termites. We hope that these observations will encourage students to collect pond water samples and see for themselves this amazing hidden world. The live photography was accomplished using a variety microscope techniques, including dark field (good for showing the natural color of subjects) and the most advanced forms of differential interference contrast (DIC gives contrast to transparent structures that would be invisible in normal bright field microscopy). While these forms of imaging living protists are particularly revealing for some aspects of micro-organism biology, all of the organisms seen here can be studied successfully with student microscopes. IMPORTANT NOTE: This program packs a lot of information and a wealth of observational data into nine different modules. We recommend that the material be viewed module by module, stopping for discussion and replay as needed. “Discussion starters” for the various modules are provided in this guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Introgression and Hybridization in Animal Parasites
    Genes 2010, 1, 102-123; doi:10.3390/genes1010102 OPEN ACCESS genes ISSN 2073-4425 www.mdpi.com/journal/genes Review An Infectious Topic in Reticulate Evolution: Introgression and Hybridization in Animal Parasites Jillian T. Detwiler * and Charles D. Criscione Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, 3258 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-979-845-0925; Fax: +1-979-845-2891. Received: 29 April 2010; in revised form: 7 June 2010 / Accepted: 7 June 2010 / Published: 9 June 2010 Abstract: Little attention has been given to the role that introgression and hybridization have played in the evolution of parasites. Most studies are host-centric and ask if the hybrid of a free-living species is more or less susceptible to parasite infection. Here we focus on what is known about how introgression and hybridization have influenced the evolution of protozoan and helminth parasites of animals. There are reports of genome or gene introgression from distantly related taxa into apicomplexans and filarial nematodes. Most common are genetic based reports of potential hybridization among congeneric taxa, but in several cases, more work is needed to definitively conclude current hybridization. In the medically important Trypanosoma it is clear that some clonal lineages are the product of past hybridization events. Similarly, strong evidence exists for current hybridization in human helminths such as Schistosoma and Ascaris. There remain topics that warrant further examination such as the potential hybrid origin of polyploid platyhelminths.
    [Show full text]
  • Pronunciation Guide to Microorganisms
    Pronunciation Guide to Microorganisms This pronunciation guide is provided to aid each student in acquiring a greater ease in discussing, describing, and using specific microorganisms. Please note that genus and species names are italicized. If they cannot be italicized, then they should be underlined (example: a lab notebook). Prokaryotic Species Correct Pronunciation Acetobacter aceti a-se-toh-BAK-ter a-SET-i Acetobacter pasteurianus a-se-toh-BAK-ter PAS-ter-iann-us Acintobacter calcoacetius a-sin-ee-toe-BAK-ter kal-koh-a-SEE-tee-kus Aerococcus viridans (air-o)-KOK-kus vi-ree-DANS Agrobacterium tumefaciens ag-roh-bak-TEAR-ium too-me-FAY-she-ens Alcaligenes denitrificans al-KAHL-li-jen-eez dee-ni-TREE-fee-cans Alcaligenes faecalis al-KAHL-li-jen-eez fee-KAL-is Anabaena an-na-BEE-na Azotobacter vinelandii a-zoe-toe-BAK-ter vin-lan-DEE-i Bacillus anthracis bah-SIL-lus AN-thray-sis Bacillus lactosporus bah-SIL-lus LAK-toe-spore-us Bacillus megaterium bah-SIL-lus Meg-a-TEER-ee-um Bacillus subtilis bah-SIL-lus SA-til-us Borrelia recurrentis bore-RELL-ee-a re-kur-EN-tis Branhamella catarrhalis bran-hem-EL-ah cat-arr-RAH-lis Citrobacter freundii sit-roe-BACK-ter FROND-ee-i Clostridium perfringens klos-TREH-dee-um per-FRINGE-enz Clostridium sporogenes klos-TREH-dee-um spore-AH-gen-ease Clostridium tetani klos-TREH-dee-um TET-ann-ee Corynebacterium diphtheriae koh-RYNE-nee-back-teer-ee-um dif-THEE-ry-ee Corynebacterium hofmanni koh-RYNE-nee-back-teer-ee-um hoff-MAN-eye Corynebacterium xerosis koh-RYNE-nee-back-teer-ee-um zer-OH-sis Enterobacter
    [Show full text]
  • A Morphological and Phylogenetic Study of the Genus Chondria (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta)
    Title A morphological and phylogenetic study of the genus Chondria (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) Author(s) Sutti, Suttikarn Citation 北海道大学. 博士(理学) 甲第13264号 Issue Date 2018-06-29 DOI 10.14943/doctoral.k13264 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/71176 Type theses (doctoral) File Information Suttikarn_Sutti.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP A morphological and phylogenetic study of the genus Chondria (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) 【紅藻ヤナギノリ属(フジマツモ科)の形態学的および系統学的研究】 Suttikarn Sutti Department of Natural History Sciences, Graduate School of Science Hokkaido University June 2018 1 CONTENTS Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………….2 Acknowledgement………………………………………………………………………….5 General Introduction………………………………………………………………………..7 Chapter 1. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of the genus Chondria based on Japanese specimens……………………………………………………………………….14 Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussions Chapter 2. Neochondria gen. nov., a segregate of Chondria including N. ammophila sp. nov. and N. nidifica comb. nov………………………………………………………...39 Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussions Conclusion Chapter 3. Yanagi nori—the Japanese Chondria dasyphylla including a new species and a probable new record of Chondria from Japan………………………………………51 Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussions Conclusion References………………………………………………………………………………...66 Tables and Figures 2 ABSTRACT The red algal tribe Chondrieae F. Schmitz & Falkenberg (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) currently
    [Show full text]
  • A Resurgence in Field Research Is Essential to Better Understand
    Received Date : 15-Mar-2013 Revised Date : 21-Oct-2013 Accepted Date : 29-Oct-2013 Article type : Symposium Article Heger et al. --- Importance of Field Protistology A Resurgence in Field Research is Essential to Better Understand the Diversity, Ecology, and Evolution of Microbial Eukaryotes Thierry J. Hegera, Virginia P. Edgcombb, Eunsoo Kimc, Julius Lukešd, Brian S. Leandera & Naoji Yubukia a The Departments of Botany and Zoology, Beaty Biodiversity Research Centre and Museum, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada b Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Geology and Geophysics Department, Woods Hole, Article MA 02543, USA c Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, 10024, USA d Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, and Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic Correspondence T. J. Heger and N. Yubuki, The Departments of Botany and Zoology, Beaty Biodiversity Research Centre and Museum, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada Telephone number: +1 604 822 4892; FAX number: +1 604 822 6089; emails: [email protected] and [email protected] ABSTRACT The discovery and characterization of protist communities from diverse environments are crucial for understanding the overall evolutionary history of life on earth. However, major questions about the diversity, ecology, and evolutionary history of protists remain unanswered,
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrastructural and Transcriptome Changes of Free-Living Sporangial Filaments in Pyropia Yezoensis Affected by Light and Culture
    Ultrastructural and transcriptome changes of free-living sporangial filaments in Pyropia yezoensis affected by light and culture density Bangxiang He1, Xiujun Xie1, and Guangce Wang1 1Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences April 28, 2020 Abstract In the life cycle of Pyropia yezoensis, sporangial filaments connect conchocelis and thallus, but the mechanisms of maturation and conchospore release of sporangial filaments are poorly understood. We found that the morphological change from vegetative growth form (hollow cells) to reproductive form (bipartite cells), and the release of conchospores from bipartite cells were all closely correlated with culture density and light intensity. Bipartite cells formed at low density (50{1,000 fragments/mL) and when stimulated by high light levels (40{100 mmol photons m-2 s-1), but conchospore release was inhibited at such light intensities. At high densities (5,000{10,000 fragments/mL), sporangial filaments retained the hollow cell morphology and rarely formed bipartite cells. Ultrastructural observation showed that the degradation of autophagosome-like structures in vacuoles caused the typical hollow form. Transcriptome analysis indicated that adaptive responses to environmental changes, mainly autophagy, endocytosis and phosphatidylinositol metabolism, caused the morphological transformation of free-living sporangial filaments. Meanwhile, the extensive promotion of energy accumulation under high light levels promoted vegetative growth of sporangial filaments, and thus inhibited conchospore release from bipartite cells. These results provide a theoretical basis for maturation of sporangial filaments and release of conchospores in P. yezoensis and other related species. Main text Ultrastructural and transcriptome changes of free-living sporangial filaments in Pyropia yezoensis affected by light and culture density Abstract In the life cycle of Pyropia yezoensis , sporangial filaments connect conchocelis and thallus, but the mecha- nisms of maturation and conchospore release of sporangial filaments are poorly understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Multigene Eukaryote Phylogeny Reveals the Likely Protozoan Ancestors of Opis- Thokonts (Animals, Fungi, Choanozoans) and Amoebozoa
    Accepted Manuscript Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opis- thokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa Thomas Cavalier-Smith, Ema E. Chao, Elizabeth A. Snell, Cédric Berney, Anna Maria Fiore-Donno, Rhodri Lewis PII: S1055-7903(14)00279-6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.012 Reference: YMPEV 4996 To appear in: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Received Date: 24 January 2014 Revised Date: 2 August 2014 Accepted Date: 11 August 2014 Please cite this article as: Cavalier-Smith, T., Chao, E.E., Snell, E.A., Berney, C., Fiore-Donno, A.M., Lewis, R., Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (2014), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ympev.2014.08.012 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 1 Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts 2 (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa 3 4 Thomas Cavalier-Smith1, Ema E. Chao1, Elizabeth A. Snell1, Cédric Berney1,2, Anna Maria 5 Fiore-Donno1,3, and Rhodri Lewis1 6 7 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Superorganisms of the Protist Kingdom: a New Level of Biological Organization
    Foundations of Science https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09688-8 Superorganisms of the Protist Kingdom: A New Level of Biological Organization Łukasz Lamża1 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract The concept of superorganism has a mixed reputation in biology—for some it is a conveni- ent way of discussing supra-organismal levels of organization, and for others, little more than a poetic metaphor. Here, I show that a considerable step forward in the understand- ing of superorganisms results from a thorough review of the supra-organismal levels of organization now known to exist among the “unicellular” protists. Limiting the discussion to protists has enormous advantages: their bodies are very well studied and relatively sim- ple (as compared to humans or termites, two standard examples in most discussions about superorganisms), and they exhibit an enormous diversity of anatomies and lifestyles. This allows for unprecedented resolution in describing forms of supra-organismal organiza- tion. Here, four criteria are used to diferentiate loose, incidental associations of hosts with their microbiota from “actual” superorganisms: (1) obligatory character, (2) specifc spatial localization of microbiota, (3) presence of attachment structures and (4) signs of co-evolu- tion in phylogenetic analyses. Three groups—that have never before been described in the philosophical literature—merit special attention: Symbiontida (also called Postgaardea), Oxymonadida and Parabasalia. Specifcally, it is argued that in certain cases—for Bihos- pites bacati and Calkinsia aureus (symbiontids), Streblomastix strix (an oxymonad), Joe- nia annectens and Mixotricha paradoxa (parabasalids) and Kentrophoros (a ciliate)—it is fully appropriate to describe the whole protist-microbiota assocation as a single organism (“superorganism”) and its elements as “tissues” or, arguably, even “organs”.
    [Show full text]
  • New Perspectives on Analysing Data from Biological Collections Based on Social Network Analytics Pedro C
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN New perspectives on analysing data from biological collections based on social network analytics Pedro C. de Siracusa, Luiz M. R. Gadelha Jr. & Artur Ziviani Biological collections have been historically regarded as fundamental sources of scientifc information on biodiversity. They are commonly associated with a variety of biases, which must be characterized and mitigated before data can be consumed. In this work, we are motivated by taxonomic and collector biases, which can be understood as the efect of particular recording preferences of key collectors on shaping the overall taxonomic composition of biological collections they contribute to. In this context, we propose two network models as the frst steps towards a network-based conceptual framework for understanding the formation of biological collections as a result of the composition of collectors’ interests and activities. Building upon the defned network models, we present a case study in which we use our models to explore the community of collectors and the taxonomic composition of the University of Brasília herbarium. We describe topological features of the networks and point out some of the most relevant collectors in the biological collection as well as their taxonomic groups of interest. We also investigate their collaborative behaviour while recording specimens. Finally, we discuss future perspectives for incorporating temporal and geographical dimensions to the models. Moreover, we indicate some possible investigation directions that could beneft from our approach based on social network analytics to model and analyse biological collections. How data is classifed in information infrastructures directly impacts our potential knowledge about diferent domains1–3.
    [Show full text]
  • Norrisiella Sphaerica Gen
    Norrisiella sphaerica gen. et sp. nov., a new coccoid chlorarachniophyte from Baja California, Mexico 著者 Ota Shuhei, Ueda Kunihiko, Ishida Ken-ichiro journal or Journal of Plant Research publication title volume 120 number 6 page range 661-670 year 2007-11-01 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2297/7674 doi: 10.1007/s10265-007-0115-y Norrisiella sphaerica gen. et sp. nov., a new coccoid chlorarachniophyte from Baja California, Mexico Shuhei Ota1, 2, Kunihiko Ueda1 and Ken-ichiro Ishida2 1Division of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan 2Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan Running title: Norrisiella sphaerica gen. et sp. nov. Correspondence: Shuhei Ota Laboratory of Plant Systematics and Phylogeny (D508) Institute of Biological Sciences Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan Tel/Fax: +81 (29) 853-7267 Fax: +81 (29) 853-4533 e-mail: [email protected] 1/29 Abstract A new chlorarachniophyte, Norrisiella sphaerica S. Ota et K. Ishida gen. et sp. nov., is described from the coast of Baja California, Mexico. We examined its morphology, ultrastructure and life cycle in detail, using light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and time-lapse videomicroscopy. We found that this chlorarachniophyte possessed the following characteristics: (i) vegetative cells were coccoid and possessed a cell wall, (ii) a pyrenoid was slightly invaded by plate-like periplastidial compartment from the tip of the pyrenoid, (iii) a nucleomorph was located near the pyrenoid base in the periplastidial compartment, (iv) cells reproduced vegetatively via autospores, and (v) a flagellate stage was present in the life cycle.
    [Show full text]