DOCSLIB.ORG

Treasury Minutes on the Twenty Fourth to the Thirtieth, the Thirty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Treasury Minutes on the Twenty Fourth to the Thirtieth, the Thirty HM Treasury Treasury Minutes on the Twenty Fourth to the Thirtieth, the Thirty Second to the Thirty Ninth, the Forty Fifth, and the Forty Seventh to the Forty Eighth Reports from the Committee of Public Accounts Session 2008-09 Cm 7717 (2008/9) ISBN 9780101771726 CORRECTION On the title page (page 1), the title for the 47th Report should read as follows: DH: Reducing Alcohol Harm: health services in England for alcohol misuse November 2009 London: The Stationery Office Treasury Minutes on the Twenty Fourth to the Thirtieth, the Thirty Second to the Thirty Ninth, the Forty Fifth, and the Forty Seventh to the Forty Eighth Reports from the Committee of Public Accounts Session 2008-09 Presented to Parliament by the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury by Command of Her Majesty October 2009 Cm 7717 £19.15 Treasury Minutes on the Twenty Fourth to the Thirtieth, the Thirty Second to the Thirty Ninth, the Forty Fifth, and the Forty Seventh to the Forty Eighth Reports from the Committee of Public Accounts Session 2008-09 24th Report DCMS: Maintaining the Occupied Royal Palaces 25th Report DCMS: Radio production efficiency at the BBC 26th Report HMRC: Management of tax debt 27th Report DCSF: Building schools for the future: renewing the secondary school estate 28th Report HO: Management of asylum application by the UK Border Agency 29th Report DH: Pay modernisation in the NHS: agenda for change 30th Report MOD: Type 45 Destroyer 32nd Report HMT: Financial management in the EU 33rd Report DCLG: Planning for homes: speeding up planning applications for major housing developments in England 34th Report DEFRA: Natural England’s role in improving sites of special scientific interest 35th Report MOJ: Administration of the Crown Court 36th Report DEFRA: Health of livestock and honeybees in England 37th Report CO: Building the capacity of the Third Sector 38th Report HMRC: The control and facilitation of imports 39th Report DECC: Warm Front Scheme 45th Report CO: Assessment of the Capability Review Programme 47th Report DH: Reducing alcohol related crime 48th Report DCSF: Renewing the physical infrastructure of English further education colleges Presented to Parliament by the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury by Command of Her Majesty October 2009 Cm 7717 £19.15 TREASURY MINUTES DATED 29 OCTOBER 2009 ON THE TWENTY FOURTH TO THE THIRTIETH, THE THIRTY SECOND TO THE THIRTY NINTH, THE FORTY FIFTH, AND THE FORTY SEVENTH TO THE FORTY EIGHTH REPORTS FROM THE COMMITTEE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS SESSION 2008-09 © Crown Copyright 2009 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please write to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 978 0 10 177172 6 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID E002653557 10/09 19585 642 Twenty Fourth Report Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and HM Treasury (HMT) Maintaining the Occupied Royal Palaces 1. The Occupied Royal Palaces Estate (the Estate) consists of Buckingham Palace, St James’s Palace, Windsor Castle, and parts of Kensington Place, Hampton Court Mews and Windsor Home Park. The 360-odd individual buildings that make up the Palaces are held in trust for the nation and used to support the official duties of The Sovereign as Head of State. The Palaces are used for a variety of functions including State visits, and receptions and dinners. Buckingham Palace and Buckingham Palace Mews, Clarence House, Windsor Castle and Frogmore House are open to paying visitors at certain times of the year. 2. The cost of maintaining the Palaces falls to the Government. The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (the Department) gives the Household an annual grant to maintain and run the Palaces, which has remained at around £15 million since 2000-01. There are separate grants for which other Government Departments are responsible. 3. The Department is accountable to Parliament for the upkeep of the Estate, but since 1991 has delegated day-to-day responsibility to the Household. The Department and the Household have agreed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), which sets out their respective roles and responsibilities. The Household’s Property Services Section manages maintenance on a day-to-day basis, and the Keeper of the Privy Purse is responsible for the management of the Property Services Section and stewardship of the grant in aid. 4. The Royal Collection Trust, an independent charitable trust, is responsible for the works of art held in trust for the nation. The Trust manages visitor admission to the Palaces and receives the income generated, which in 2007-08 totalled £28 million. The Trust shares some of the Windsor Castle income with the Household (£1.8 million in 2007-08), and from April 2009 the Trust plans to share income from visitors to Buckingham Palace with the Household. 5. On the basis of a report from the Comptroller and Auditor General, the Committee took evidence from the Department and the Household. In addition, the Committee visited Buckingham Palace, Clarence House, St James Palace, and Windsor Castle to see a selection of the Household’s maintenance projects. PAC Conclusion (1): The Household has reported that there is a £32 million backlog of maintenance work but this is not supported by rigorous analysis. In the absence of a consistent approach to assessing the condition of the Estate and calculating the backlog, and without an assessment of the practical consequences of the backlog, the Department and the Household cannot be sure how big the problem is or what to do about it. The Household should define criteria for inspecting the condition of the Estate, agree with the Department the basis for calculating the maintenance backlog and, before the end of 2009, set out a plan for managing it. 6. The Department partially agrees with the Committee’s conclusion. The backlog figure of £32 million reported in the Royal Household’s 2007-08 Annual Report is an estimate of how much will be needed in ten year’s time if the grant in aid remains at £15 million a year, not at the present. 7. The Household is confident that its assessment of the backlog is well founded. However, it is recognised that the records of condition should be improved, so that they are consistent. The Household is considering the use of software developed by Defence Estates, which measures ‘target’ condition and ‘actual’ condition based upon specific definitions of condition for each part of a building. It is proposed to evaluate this software by the end of 2009 and, assuming that it is successful and the criteria agreed with the Department, to record all of the Estate on the software by the end of 2011. A member of the Property Section management team has been transferred to the role of Estates Surveyor to undertake this major task. 1 PAC Conclusion (2): Work required to repair the Mausoleum, a monument of national importance, has been outstanding for 14 years and its condition is getting worse. Repairing the Mausoleum would cost around £3 million but resource constraints mean the Household has no plans to do the required work. Ultimately, the condition of the estate is a matter for the Department, which should identify how the restoration of the Mausoleum can be funded without impacting on the Household’s resources for maintaining the rest of the Estate. 8. The Department agrees with the Committee that with a project of the complexity of the repair of the Mausoleum, other means of funding may need to be found. Together with English Heritage, the Household is currently assessing the nature of the deterioration and what is necessary to slow or arrest that deterioration. When the Household has updated its detailed estimates for repair and agreed a strategy for carrying out the work, the Department will consider it alongside other priorities, and in the light of the Household’s other resources. PAC Conclusion (3): The Department for Culture, Media and Sport is accountable to Parliament for the upkeep of the Occupied Royal Palaces but does not have a firm grip on its responsibilities. The Department has set the Household an objective for the condition of the Estate, but does not measure the Household’s performance, and has allowed a maintenance backlog to build up despite our warning that this might happen. The Department should establish performance measures that keep it appraised of the condition of the Estate starting in the 2009-10 financial year. 9. The Department does not agree with the conclusion that it does not have a firm grip on its responsibilities. The Household’s property maintenance work is monitored on an ongoing basis by the Department’s specialist consultants, Watts PLC, who report to the Department on a regular basis. The reports are shared with the Household, and any issues are discussed and resolved. It is anticipated that the Household will agree performance indicators with the Department to assess actual condition against target condition for each part of the Estate from December 2009 with the whole Estate completed by December 2011. The software provided by Defence Estates may also help focus expenditure to highlight where the most significant improvements can be made.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Open PDF 390KB
    Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Oral evidence: Propriety of governance in light of Greensill, HC 59 Tuesday 8 June 2021 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 8 June 2021. Watch the meeting Members present: Mr William Wragg (Chair); Ronnie Cowan; Jackie Doyle-Price; Rachel Hopkins; Mr David Jones; John McDonnell; David Mundell; Tom Randall; Lloyd Russell-Moyle; Karin Smyth; John Stevenson. Questions 1 - 123 Witnesses I: Lord Maude of Horsham, former Minister for the Cabinet Office; Ian Watmore, former Permanent Secretary for the Cabinet Office; Sir John Manzoni, former Permanent Secretary for the Cabinet Office; and Bill Crothers, former Government Chief Commercial Officer and former Director at Greensill Capital. Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Lord Maude of Horsham, Ian Watmore, Sir John Manzoni and Bill Crothers. Q1 Chair: Good morning and welcome to the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee. This morning’s evidence session will consider propriety and ethics in light of Greensill. The Committee is very grateful indeed to all the witnesses who are giving their time today. This morning we will have four separate witnesses who will be speaking to us in turn; I will ask them each to introduce themselves for the record at the start of their particular section. I welcome, first of all this morning, Lord Maude. Could I ask you to introduce yourself for the record? Lord Maude of Horsham: I am Francis Maude. I was Minister for the Cabinet Office between 2010 and 2015. Q2 Chair: Thank you. During that time, Mr Lex Greensill was employed as an adviser on supply chain finance and subsequently as a Crown representative.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Information Bulletin
    Contents House of Commons • Noticeboard ..........................................................................................................1 • The Week Ahead..................................................................................................2 • Order of Oral Questions .......................................................................................3 Weekly Business Information • Business of the House of Commons 13 – 17 October 2008 .................................4 Bulletin • Written Ministerial Statements.............................................................................7 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Commons 20 – 24 October 2008............8 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Lords 20 – 24 October 2008.................12 Editor: Mary Durkin Legislation House of Commons Public Legislation Information Office • Public Bills before Parliament 2007/08..............................................................14 London • Bills - Presentation, Publication and Royal Assent ............................................24 SW1A 2TT • Public and General Acts 2007/08 .......................................................................25 • Draft Bills under consideration or published during 2007/08 Session ...............26 TEL: 020 7219 4272 FAX: 020 7219 5839 Private Legislation [email protected] • Private Bills before Parliament 2007/08.............................................................27 www.parliament.uk • Draft Provisional Orders as at 17 October 2008.................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Role of the Head of the Civil Service
    House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee Role of the Head of the Civil Service Written Evidence . 1 List of written evidence Page no. 1 Professor David Richards and Professor Martin Smith (HCS 01) 3 2 David Laughrin (HCS 02) 10 3 Rt Hon Peter Riddell (HCS 03) 15 4 Professor Colin Talbot (HCS 04) 18 5 Sue Cameron (HCS 05) 22 6 Sir Douglas Wass (HCS 06) 26 2 Written evidence submitted by Professor David Richards and Professor Martin Smith1 (HCS 01) 1. The growing role of the Prime Minister and the development of his office have led to questions over the ability of the Cabinet Secretary to fulfil the dual role of adviser to the Prime Minster and as Head of the Civil Service responsible for its day-to-day corporate management. A view both from within Whitehall and beyond has taken root that the balancing of these two roles has become too onerous a task for one individual to execute effectively. Especially in the context of the continual process of reform that now appears to be the norm within Whitehall. 2. It is however interesting to note that as recently as 2009-10 both Lord Turnbull and Sir Gus O’Donnell opposed the splitting of the post into separate jobs. Lord Turnbull noted that it: “...has been tried twice and it was a flop both times. If you talk to the people who got the job as Head of the Home Civil Service … I think that they would probably say, ‘I wish I’d never done it’.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitor 50 Constitution Unit Newsletter | January 2012
    Monitor 50 Constitution Unit Newsletter | January 2012 Will the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee change the rules of succession? The announcement in October at the Commonwealth conference in the removal of the ‘unjust discrimination’ against Catholics, the Perth of changes to the rules of succession suggested it was a done Archbishop of Westminster, Vincent Nichols, said that he recognised deal. David Cameron had obtained the agreement of the heads of the importance of the established Church of England. The Catholic government of the 15 other countries of which the Queen is head Church in Scotland has been less accommodating. And in the 15 of state (the realms). The UK can now be expected to lead the way, realms where Catholics outnumber Anglicans by three to one, riding the tide of goodwill towards the monarchy following the royal there may also be less understanding. wedding in 2011 and the Queen’s diamond jubilee in 2012. But all the realms will then have to change their laws, in a process which could take years. EXECUTIVE It has been a longstanding aim of British governments to end the discrimination in the laws of succession. 11 private members’ bills have been introduced into Parliament in the last 20 years to reform the Act of Settlement. Most other European monarchies have already Reconfiguration of the Cabinet Secretary’s role changed their rules of succession to make them gender neutral. Sweden changed their law in 1980, Holland in 1983, Norway in Sir Gus O’Donnell has retired as UK Cabinet Secretary after 32 years 1990, Belgium in 1991, Denmark in 2009 (with a referendum), and as a civil servant.
    [Show full text]
  • Making and Breaking Whitehall Departments: a Guide to Machinery of Government Changes
    Anne White and Patrick Dunleavy Making and breaking Whitehall departments: a guide to machinery of government changes Report Original citation: White, Anne and Dunleavy, Patrick (2010) Making and breaking Whitehall departments: a guide to machinery of government changes. Institute for Government; LSE Public Policy Group, London, UK. This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27949/ Originally available from LSE Public Policy Group Available in LSE Research Online: May 2010 © 2010 Institute for Government LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. The Institute for Government is here to act as a catalyst for better government. The Institute for Government is an independent centre founded in 2008 to help make government more effective. • We carry out research, look into the big governance challenges of the day and find ways to help government improve, re-think and sometimes see things differently. • We offer unique insights and advice from experienced people who know what it’s Making and breaking like to be inside government both in the UK and overseas.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Between Central and Local Governments in the U.K
    Communication between Central and Local Governments in the U.K. Yukiko Fujita, Professor, Faculty of Law, Senshu University This article focuses on communication between central and local governments in the U.K., especially on the roles and functions of DCLG, LGA and SOLACE. Its two main features are firstly that networks among politicians are strictly separated from those of administrative officers, and secondly that their informal communication is as important as formal communication such as consultation and periodic meetings. Moreover, policies based on localism and decentralisation of the current coalition government have just started, so it is too early to evaluate them. The aggressive propositions by special local governments and joint bodies like GLA and GMCA might affect the relationship between central and local governments. Introduction In the United Kingdom1, the Localism bill was passed into law on October 31, 2011 (Royal Assent on November 15, 2011). The Act includes a wide variety of provisions including granting of general power of competence which allows local governments any activity unprohibited by law, enhanced authority of local communities, granting of more discretion on regional developments to local governments and communities, and a plan to introduce a mayor election system to metropolitan cities. Based on the Local Government Act 1972, the relationship between the central government and local governments in the UK (hereinafter called “the relationship between central and local governments”) has featured strong
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Service Commission Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20
    161 C 6% C Regulating recruitment to the Civil Service, Annual Report providing assurance that appointments are on merit on the and Accounts basis of fair and open competition Helping to promote the Civil Service Code and its values of honesty, integrity, objectivity and 2019/20 impartiality B declared, 44,858 53% 9% C S ISBN 978-1-5286-1925-7 SCS CCS0320292694 2 C HC 455 Civil Service Commission Annual Report and Accounts 2019–20 Accounts presented to Parliament, the Scottish Parliament and the National Assembly for Wales pursuant to paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 to the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 Report presented to Parliament, the Scottish Parliament and the National Assembly for Wales pursuant to paragraph 17 of Schedule 1 to the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 20 July 2020 HC 455 Part 1: Annual Report 2019/20 © Crown copyright 2020 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at: www.gov.uk/official-documents Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: Civil Service Commission, Room G/08, 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ [email protected], 020 7271 0830 ISBN 978-1-5286-1925-7
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Information Bulletin
    Contents House of Commons • Noticeboard..........................................................................................................1 • The Week Ahead..................................................................................................2 Weekly • Order of Oral Questions.......................................................................................3 Information Business Bulletin • Business of the House of Commons 7 May – 11 May 2007 ................................5 • Written Ministerial Statements.............................................................................7 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Commons 14 May – 18 May 2007.........8 Editor: Nick Majer • Forthcoming Business of the House of Lords 14 May – 18 May 2007..............12 House of Commons Legislation Information Office London Public Legislation SW1A 2TT • Public Bills before Parliament 2006/07..............................................................16 • Bills - Presentation, Publication and Royal Assent ............................................24 TEL: 020 7219 4272 • Public and General Acts 2006/07.......................................................................25 FAX: 020 7219 5839 • Draft Bills under consideration or published during 2006/07 Session ...............26 [email protected] www.parliament.uk Private Legislation • Private Bills before Parliament 2006/07 ............................................................28 To Contact the Editor: Delegated Legislation TEL: 020 7219 5715 • Statutory Instruments
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Office Permanent Secretaries’ Meetings with External Organisations (Including Meetings with Proprietors, Editors and Senior Media Executives)1
    CABINET OFFICE PERMANENT SECRETARIES’ MEETINGS WITH EXTERNAL ORGANISATIONS (INCLUDING MEETINGS WITH PROPRIETORS, EDITORS AND SENIOR MEDIA EXECUTIVES)1: 1 July to 30 September 2011 Sir Gus O’Donnell, Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service, Date of Name of External Purpose of Meeting Meeting Organisation July Bank of England General Discussion July Steve Radcliffe General discussion July Martin Seligman Economics seminar July Frontier Economics Reception and Guest Speaker July SCCO International Launch Reception and Guest Speaker July BBC R4 Lobby General discussion August Stone court consulting Lunch and General discussion September UCL General Discussion and Interview September Salesian College Interview (for college magazine) September Build Africa General Discussion September Bank of England Lunch and Guest Speaker September Sir Peter Gershon General discussion September Lucy Neville-Rolfe General Discussion 1 Does not normally include meetings with Government bodies such as other Government Departments and Agencies, non-departmental public bodies, Government reviewers, and representatives of Parliament, devolved or foreign Governments. Sir Jon Cunliffe - Permanent Secretary Month of Name of External Purpose of Meeting Meeting Organisation July The Prince's Charities' Food security and G20 International Sustainability Unit July Oxford Analytica Middle East & North Africa July Financial Times UK Representation in Brussels July NYSE Euronext Financial Services July FTI Consulting Global Issues July BG Energy Holding Limited UK
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a – Breakdown of Interviews
    Appendix A – Breakdown of Interviews The interviews were drawn from four ESRC projects: • The Changing Role of Central Government Departments in Britain ESRC Award No.L124251023 [Research conducted 1995–1998] • Labour and the Reform of Whitehall: Inheritance, Transition and Accommo dation ESRC Award No.R000222657 [Research conducted 1998–2000] • Public Service Delivery Programme: Analysing Delivery Chains in the Home Office. ESRC Award. No.RES.153-25-0037. [Research conducted 2005–7] • Building Bridges between Political Biography and Political Science – A Methodo- logically Innovative Study of the Core Executive Under New Labour ESRC Award No. RES-000-22-2040. [Research conducted 2006–7] Interviews Numbers Senior civil servants 149 Other civil servants 48 Labour ministers 15 Conservative ministers 21 Special advisers 6 NGO representatives 63 204 Appendix B – Permanent Secretaries and Their Relevant Departments 1996–2004 1. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) 1996 Permanent R J Packer Secretary 1997 (before the Permanent R J Packer general election) Secretary 1997 (after the Permanent R J Packer general election) Secretary 1998 Permanent R J Packer Secretary 1999 Permanent R J Packer Secretary 2000 Permanent Brian Secretary Bender In 2001, combined with the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) to form the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). 2. Cabinet Office 1996 Secretary of the Cabinet and Robin Butler Head of the Home Civil Service Permanent Secretary (Office of R Mountfield
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard)
    Public Accounts Committee OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard) Inquiry into Capacity and Capability in the Northern Ireland Civil Service: Mr Ian Watmore, First Civil Service Commissioner (GB) 4 March 2021 NORTHERN IRELAND ASSEMBLY Public Accounts Committee Inquiry into Capacity and Capability in the Northern Ireland Civil Service: Mr Ian Watmore, First Civil Service Commissioner (GB) 4 March 2021 Members present for all or part of the proceedings: Mr William Humphrey (Chairperson) Mr Roy Beggs (Deputy Chairperson) Mr Cathal Boylan Ms Órlaithí Flynn Mr Harry Harvey Mr David Hilditch Mr Maolíosa McHugh Mr Andrew Muir Mr Matthew O'Toole Witnesses: Mr Ian Watmore Civil Service Commission Mr Stuart Stevenson Department of Finance Mr Kieran Donnelly Northern Ireland Audit Office The Chairperson (Mr Humphrey): Good afternoon, Mr Watmore. We can hear you loud and clear. You are very welcome to the Northern Ireland Assembly Public Accounts Committee (PAC). In a moment, I will ask you to make a short presentation, and then, if you would be so kind, you can answer questions. Mr Watmore, so that you know, in attendance from the Northern Ireland Audit Office (NIAO) are Mr Kieran Donnelly, the Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG); Mr Rodney Allen, a director of that office; and Mr Stuart Stevenson, the Treasury Officer of Accounts (TOA), who joins the meeting remotely. The floor is yours, Mr Watmore. Mr Ian Watmore (Civil Service Commission): Very good. Thank you very much, everybody. I hope that you are well this afternoon. I will not keep you long with opening remarks. The job of First Civil Service Commissioner was established back in 1855.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Service Commission Annual Report and Accounts 2020/21
    163 competitions chaired Interactive document by Commissioners. Click to navigate Where declared, disabled candidates made up of total applicants in competitions 5% chaired by Commissioners. Regulating recruitment to the Civil Service, Annual Report providing assurance that appointments are on merit on the and Accounts basis of fair and open competition Helping to promote the Civil Service Code and its values of honesty, integrity, objectivity and 2020/21 impartiality Where declared, ethnic minority candidates 25 made up 60,487 Accredited Life Chances people were recruited to schemes. the Civil Service through 23% fair and open of total applicants in competition. competitions chaired by Commissioners. HC 465 Civil Service Commission Annual Report and Accounts 2020/21 Accounts presented to Parliament, the Scottish Parliament and the National Assembly for Wales pursuant to paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 to the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 Report presented to Parliament, the Scottish Parliament and the National Assembly for Wales pursuant to paragraph 17 of Schedule 1 to the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 21 July 2021 HC 465 Annual Report 2020/21 © Crown copyright 2021 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission
    [Show full text]