DOCSLIB.ORG

Bridge Repair and Replacement Projects for Fiscal Year 2012-13, See Appendix B-1 and B-2 Dollars in Thousands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bridge Repair and Replacement Projects for Fiscal Year 2012-13, See Appendix B-1 and B-2 Dollars in Thousands Executiive Summary Executive Summary This document summarizes the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) process for prioritizing construction opportunities on the state’s transportation system and the methodology and metrics used in making the investment decisions. The department’s priorities focus on three key program areas that include: • Highway Capacity 3 o Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Capacity 2 o Non-SIS Capacity and Other Enhancements • Preservation 5 o Bridge Repair and Replacement 7 o Resurfacing FDOT District Map: 1 • Safety 4 o Highway Safety Improvement Program o High Risk Rural Roads 6 o Safe Routes to Schools The Florida Department of Transportation’s commitments of construction funds for the fiscal year 2012-13 total $3.8 billion and are allocated, by program, as shown below. The construction programs represent 52 percent of the total $7.4 billion Work Program for the year. Construction Program Allocations Safety Bridge CONSTRUCTION TOTAL No. of 2% 10% Projects PROGRAM FUNDING $ Resurfacing Highway Capacity 2,739,153 452 16% Bridge 378,834 112 Resurfacing 601,159 195 Safety 88,872 118 Construction Total $3,808,018 877 Highway Dollars in Thousands Capacity 72% The department’s allocation of construction funding for fiscal year 2012-13, by district are as follows: TOTAL No. of FDOT DISTRICT District Construction Funding Distribution FUNDING $ Projects 1 189,910 127 District 1 Statewide District 2 2 188,676 111 5% 8% 5% 3 452,256 99 Turnpike District 3 4 366,127 117 26% 12% 5 262,987 120 District 4 6 218,934 108 10% 7 825,894 90 Turnpike 1,004,763 83 District 5 7% Statewide 298,471 22 District 7 Construction Total $3,808,018 877 22% District 6 6% Dollars in Thousands PPrrriiioorrriiitttiiizziiinngg FFllloorrriiiddaa’’’ss HHiiigghhwwaayy IIInnvveesstttmmeenntttss PPaaggee 11 Executiive Summary Executive Summary HHiiigghhwwaayy CCaappaacciiitttyy –– KKeeyy PPooiiinntttss Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Capacity • Capacity projects on SIS facilities originate from FDOT district offices and modal plan priorities. • FDOT uses the Strategic Investment Tool (SIT) to evaluate and rank projects. • Projects are reviewed to determine if existing funding commitments, phasing or timing issues, availability of funding for SIS projects and FDOT geographic distribution analysis affect them. • Projects are funded based upon “needs” analysis in conjunction with the availability of funding. Non-SIS Capacity • State law stipulates distribution of funding to districts based on population and motor fuel tax collections. • Projects are selected through coordination with Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and local government entities where no MPO exists. • Projects are selected based upon local priority, funding availability and project timing. PPrreesseerrvvaatttiiioonn –– KKeeyy PPooiiinntttss Bridge Repair and Replacement • Bridge Condition Ratings are based on bi-annual inspections of all Florida’s bridges. • FDOT identifies projects and classifies them as maintenance, repair, or replacement, based on the severity of deficiency. o Maintenance projects address the regular upkeep of the bridge and are completed within one year of identification. o Repair projects are larger-scale projects generally intended to keep a bridge in good condition thereby preventing or delaying complete bridge replacement or more expensive repairs. o Replacement projects are programmed for bridges in poor condition when the cost of repair is higher than the cost of complete replacement. • Section 334.046(4), Florida Statutes (F.S.), requires the department to ensure that 90 percent of department-maintained bridges meet department standards. • If a critical condition is identified, FDOT immediately closes the bridge until repairs are made. Resurfacing • Pavement Condition Survey – FDOT evaluates each State Highway System facility annually, assigning a condition rating by measuring wheel path rutting, pavement cracking and ride quality. • The Pavement Condition Survey ratings are used in project identification and prioritization. • Section 334.046(4), F.S., requires the department to ensure that 80 percent of the pavement on the State Highway System meets department standards. SSaafffeetttyy –– KKeeyy PPooiiinntttss • “Stand alone” safety projects are funded through various programs focused on reducing crashes, identifying and correcting high-hazard locations, increasing safety for students who walk or bike to school, and improving bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Safety considerations are also addressed in both preservation and capacity programs. • Benefit/Cost analyses are performed on all safety projects based upon historical crash data. PPrrriiioorrriiitttiiizziiinngg FFllloorrriiiddaa’’’ss HHiiigghhwwaayy IIInnvveesstttmmeenntttss PPaaggee 22 Capaciity Program Capacity Program The department’s capacity program is a statewide “needs-based” planning effort, which uses objective analysis to identify capacity improvements for the following areas: • Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Capacity • Non-SIS Capacity and Other Enhancements FDOT TOTAL No. of Capacity Funding Distribution DISTRICT FUNDING $ Projects District 1 District 2 1 125,010 72 Statewide 5% 3% District 3 2 80,669 51 8% 5% 3 139,813 40 District 4 4 258,721 61 9% 5 163,221 66 6 93,896 27 District 5 7 685,196 44 6% Turnpike 967,992 76 District 6 Statewide 224,635 15 Turnpike 4% Construction 35% District 7 $2,739,153 452 Total: 25% Dollars in Thousands Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Overview KEY FACTS ABOUT THE SIS: The Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) was established in • FDOT’s goal is to allocate 75% 2003 to enhance Florida’s economic competitiveness by of all discretionary funding to focusing state resources on the transportation facilities most projects on SIS facilities. critical for statewide and interregional travel. The SIS is a statewide network of high priority transportation facilities, • SIS facilities serve 70% of all including the state’s largest and most significant commercial truck traffic on the State service airports, spaceports, deepwater seaports, freight rail Highway System. terminals, passenger rail and intercity bus terminals, rail corridors, waterways and highways. These facilities are the workhorses of Florida’s transportation system. They carry more • SIS highways represent only than 99 percent of all commercial air passengers and cargo, 3% of total road mileage in the virtually all waterborne freight and cruise passengers, nearly all State, but carry 55% of total rail freight and 89 percent of all interregional rail and bus traffic on the State Highway passengers. They also account for more than 70 percent of all System. truck traffic and 55 percent of total traffic on the State Highway System. PPrrriiioorrriiitttiiizziiinngg FFllloorrriiiddaa’’’ss HHiiigghhwwaayy IIInnvveesstttmmeenntttss PPaaggee 33 Capaciity Program Capacity Program Project Identification FDOT allocates funds for SIS projects throughout the state based on need to ensure the state's most important transportation facilities retain their ability to safely and efficiently move large volumes of people and goods throughout the state and connect to other states and nations. The identification of needs on Florida’s SIS is the result of cooperative planning efforts involving coordination between FDOT central and district offices, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), Expressway Authorities, local governments and modal partners from around the state. The assessment of needs includes an identification of highly congested roadways, safety and security considerations, access to business and industry, links to military facilities and improvements to major economic assets such as seaports, airports and rail facilities. FFllloorriiiddaa’’’ss SSIISS CCaappaacciiittyy IImmpprroovveemmeenntt PPrrooggrraamm Project Identification Project Prioritization Project Selection Projjectt IIdenttiiffiicattiion Projjectt Priioriittiizattiion Projjectt Sellecttiion Project Prioritization Once the needs of the SIS are identified and project costs are established, FDOT has the responsibility of determining the manner in which the identified projects will be prioritized and selected for funding. FDOT’s SIS capacity program operates with a limited funding threshold and the department must maximize available resources on an annual basis when determining how to meet the greatest needs of the state. The following factors are considered in the prioritization and project selection process for the SIS: PPrrriiioorrriiitttiiizziiinngg FFllloorrriiiddaa’’’ss HHiiigghhwwaayy IIInnvveesstttmmeenntttss PPaaggee 44 Capaciity Program Capacity Program • District and Modal Plan Priorities: Project priorities identified by FDOT district offices and modal plans take into account the MPO, local government and modal plan priorities. These priorities serve as the basis for the state-wide prioritization process. • Strategic Investment Tool (SIT): FDOT’s SIT tool prioritizes and scores SIS highway projects based on FDOT’S SIT TOOL SCORES the 2010 SIS Strategic Plan goals using quantitative PROJECTS BASED ON THE measures for each goal. By default, the SIT weights FOLLOWING SIS GOALS AND each goal equally (five goals each accounting for 20 MEASURES: percent of the overall SIT score with a highest possible score of 100.) Goals can be weighted to place • Safety and Security – Crash additional emphasis on a specific goal while reducing Ratio, Fatal Crash Ratio, Bridge Appraisal Rating, Link to the emphasis of another. Military
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Selmon Expressway Western Extension – Gandy Boulevard Assessment Adaptation Strategies and Recommendations
    Selmon Expressway Western Extension – Gandy Boulevard Assessment Adaptation Strategies and Recommendations June 2016 Selmon Expressway Western Extension - Gandy Boulevard Assessment Adaptation Strategies and Recommendations prepared for Hillsborough Metropolitan Planning Organization for Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 2101 West Commercial Boulevard, Suite 3200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 with Florida Transportation Engineering, Inc. Resilient Analytics, Inc. date June 2016 Gandy Boulevard Implementation Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Gandy Boulevard ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Potential for Storm Surge and Inundation.................................................................................. 1-4 2.0 Adaptation Options ............................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Do Nothing ................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Erosion Control .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mccook, Kathleen De La Pena the Florida Library History Project
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 422 005 IR 057 129 AUTHOR Jasper, Catherine; McCook, Kathleen de la Pena TITLE The Florida Library History Project. INSTITUTION University of South Florida, Tampa. PUB DATE 1998-08-00 NOTE 483p. PUB TYPE Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF02/PC20 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Information Technology; Library Collections; *Library Development; Library Personnel; *Library Services; Library Statistics; Library Surveys; *Public Libraries; State Programs IDENTIFIERS *Florida; *Library History ABSTRACT The Florida Library History Project (FLHP) began in January 1998. Letters requesting histories were sent to all public libraries in Florida with follow-up letters sent after an initial response was received from the libraries. E-mail messages were sent out to FL-LIB listservs encouraging participation in the project. A poster session was presented by Catherine Jasper at the 1998 Florida Library Association (FLA) Annual Conference, an event that marked FLA's 75th anniversary. At the end of this funding period, 89 library systems and organizations had provided histories. These have been compiled and are reproduced in this volume as submitted by participating libraries. Highlights include library founding, collections, services, budgets and expenditures, personnel, funding, survey results, technology, and developments. (AEF) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *************************************************.*******************************
    [Show full text]
  • TAMPA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1977-78 M Rs
    Sunland Tribune Volume 4 Article 1 1978 Full Issue Sunland Tribune Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/sunlandtribune Recommended Citation Tribune, Sunland (1978) "Full Issue," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 4 , Article 1. Available at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/sunlandtribune/vol4/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sunland Tribune by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SUNLAND TRIBUNE On Our Cover Volume IV Number 1 November, 1978 Old post card depicts Gordon Keller Journal of the Memorial Hospital, a "permanent TAMPA monument" to the memory of City HISTORICAL SOCIETY Treasurer and merchant Gordon Tampa, Florida Keller. HAMPTON DUNN Editor -Photo from HAMPTON DUNN COLLECTION Officers DR. L. GLENN WESTFALL 7DEOHRI&RQWHQWV President MRS. DAVID McCLAIN GORDON WHO? GORDON KELLER 2 Vice President By Hampton Dunn MRS. MARTHA TURNER Corresponding Secretary TAMPA HEIGHTS: MRS. THOMAS MURPHY TAMPA'S FIRST RESIDENTIAL SUBURB 6 Recording Secretary By Marston C. Leonard MRS. DONN GREGORY Treasurer FAMOUS CHART RECOVERED 11 Board of Directors I REMEMBER AUNT KATE 12 Mrs. A. M. Barrow Dr. James W. Covington By Lula Joughin Dovi Hampton Dunn Mrs. James L. Ferman Mrs. Joanne Frasier THE STORY OF DAVIS ISLANDS 1924-1926 16 Mrs. Thomas L. Giddens By Dr. James W. Covington Mrs. Donn Gregory Mrs. John R. Himes Mrs. Samuel 1. Latimer, Jr. DR. HOWELL TYSON LYKES Marston C. (Bob) Leonard Mrs. David McClain FOUNDER OF AN EMPIRE 30 Mrs. Thomas Murphy By James M.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Mobility Technical Memorandum
    HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY MPO 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FREIGHT MOBILITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization 601 East Kennedy Blvd. – 18th Floor Tampa, FL 33601 (813) 272-5940 www.hillsboroughmpo.org The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant(s) from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f) of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. April 2009 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Freight Mobility Technical Memorandum TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... I-1 1.0 FREIGHT MOBILITY IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ............................................ 1-1 1.1 Existing and Emerging FACs ........................................................................ 1-1 1.1.1 Anderson Road/Tampa International Airport ..................................... 1-4 1.1.2 Port Tampa ........................................................................................ 1-4 1.1.3 Hooker’s Point (Port of Tampa) ......................................................... 1-4 1.1.4 Rockport/Port Sutton/Pendola Point (Port of Tampa) ....................... 1-4 1.1.5 Alafia River (Port of Tampa) .............................................................. 1-4 1.1.6
    [Show full text]
  • "Davis Causeway"?
    Sunland Tribune Volume 5 Article 7 1979 Will Its Original Name be Restored to "Davis Causeway"? Hampton Dunn Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/sunlandtribune Recommended Citation Dunn, Hampton (1979) "Will Its Original Name be Restored to "Davis Causeway"?," Sunland Tribune: Vol. 5 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/sunlandtribune/vol5/iss1/7 This Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sunland Tribune by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WILL ITS ORIGINAL NAME BE RESTORED TO ‘DAVIS CAUSEWAY’? By HAMPTON DUNN What in the heck is the name of that span across Old Tampa Bay, linking Tampa and Clearwater? It was built by the late Capt. Ben T. Davis back in the depression years of the early 1930s and was christened "Davis Causeway." But shortly after his death in 1946, the Florida State Road Department, which had acquired ownership of the facility, used this project as a way to honor its Road Board member from the First District Courtney W. Campbell, later a U.S. Congressman, and now deceased.' A confused public calls it all combinations. The American Automobile Association (AAA) maps designate the development as "Courtney Campbell Causeway." A marker at the entrance to the bridge-road calls it "Courtney Campbell Parkway." Tampa's municipal beach at the east end is formally named "Ben T. Davis Memorial Beach." Grandson is Crusader With a strong movement on to clear up this confusion in the name, one letter writer to the newspaper has suggested that it be called "Davis-Campbell Causeway" to satisfy the heirs of both names that have been honored in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway Point Two-Story Single Tenant Office Building | 50,931 SF 10051 5Th Street North, St
    Gateway Point Two-Story Single Tenant Office Building | 50,931 SF 10051 5th Street North, St. Petersburg, Florida The Capital Markets Group of Cushman & Wakefield has been retained by the Owner as the exclusive agent for the sale of Gateway Point (the “Property”), a 50,931 rentable square foot (rsf) office building center property located in St. Petersburg, FL.The owner has not established a specific asking price but is a sophisticated, market sensitive seller with expectations of achieving the value that premium assets of this quality command. INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS • CREDIT TENANCY – 100% leased to JSA Healthcare Corporation, a subsidiary of DaVita, Inc. (S&P Rated BB). • BELOW MARKET RENT - In-place rent is 4% below market, providing upside upon renewal. • PURCHASE PRICE SIGNIFICANTLY BELOW REPLACEMENT COST. • RECENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BY LANDLORD AND TENANT - Tenant has significant improvements scheduled including upgrades to restrooms, security systems, reception areas, and the first-floor lobby. • SUPERIOR LOCATION AND VISIBILITY – Ideally located in the Gateway submarket on the Southwest Corner of 4th Street North and Gandy Boulevard and in the immediate vicinity of executive and workforce housing, with over 10k multifamily units within a 3-mile radius, restaurants, and other amenities with visibility from both major roadways. • ABOVE MARKET PARKING RATIO – The Property’s 5.1 per 1,000 sf parking ratio is ideal for dense suburban office users providing a competitive advantage. • STRONG MARKET FUNDAMENTALS – The Tampa Bay market posted over 705,000 sf of positive absorption in 2016, significantly reducing vacancy. Additionally, average asking rates in the MSA have increased 5% in the last twelve months.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contributions of George S. Gandy, Ben T. Davis, and Courtney Campbell to the Development of the Tampa Bay Area
    Tampa Bay History Volume 20 Issue 2 Article 4 12-1-1998 Spans of Time: The Contributions of George S. Gandy, Ben T. Davis, and Courtney Campbell to the Development of the Tampa Bay Area David W. Adams Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/tampabayhistory Recommended Citation Adams, David W. (1998) "Spans of Time: The Contributions of George S. Gandy, Ben T. Davis, and Courtney Campbell to the Development of the Tampa Bay Area," Tampa Bay History: Vol. 20 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/tampabayhistory/vol20/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tampa Bay History by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Adams: Spans of Time: The Contributions of George S. Gandy, Ben T. Davis SPANS OF TIME: THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF GEORGE S. GANDY, BEN T. DAVIS, AND COURTNEY CAMPBELL TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TAMPA BAY AREA by David W. Adams The growth of the communities of the Tampa Bay area into a single metropolitan area depended on bridges. As late as 1920, the waters of Tampa Bay formed a natural barrier separating the city of Tampa from St. Petersburg and Clearwater in Pinellas County. In the absence of any bridges spanning the bay, it took from several hours to travel by boat, automobile, or train from the cities on the Gulf of Mexico to Tampa. The completion of the Gandy Bridge in 1924 and the Davis Causeway (today’s Courtney Campbell Causeway) in 1934 directly linked the three cities into what would eventually become the Tampa Bay metropolitan area, which today has a population of over two million people.
    [Show full text]
  • Tampa Bay Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Plan
    Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) TAMPA BAY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN Tampa Bay Local Emergency Planning Committee 4000 Gateway Centre Blvd, Suite 100 Pinellas Park, Florida 33782-6136 (727) 570-5151, Ext. 29 Twenty-Sixth Revision June 2019 In preparing this plan, the Tampa Bay Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) utilized and compiled data contained in the county-prepared Hazardous Materials Annexes and the respective County Comprehensive Emergency Response Plans (CEMP). Neither the LEPC, nor any of its members or staff, attests to the validity or reliability of the information passed through this plan. No conclusions have been drawn as to compliance with any Federal or State laws or regulations pertinent hereto. FORWARD TO TWENTY-SIXTH REVISION The Twenty-Sixth Revision of the Tampa Bay Local Emergency Planning Committee Response Plan contains numerous changes. Most of the notable changes were in association with the updating of population estimates, the extremely hazardous substances facilities and medical facilities, as well as the recognition of the annual HMEP training initiatives and the annual LEPC exercise overview. The COMPLIANCE CRITERIA immediately follows. Hazards Analyses of all Tampa Bay LEPC District facilities have been placed on a schedule so that they are now current for the preceding fiscal year. Analyses are conducted on a July to June cycle, performing 50 percent of the county’s total facilities one year and the remaining 50 percent during the following year. Each year is further divided with the first 50 percent (25 percent of the county’s total facilities) being due by November 1st annually and the second 50 percent (25 percent of the county’s total facilities) being due by February 1st annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Selling St. Petersburg: John Lodwick and the Promotion of a Florida Paradise Nevin D
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Selling St. Petersburg: John Lodwick and the promotion of a Florida paradise Nevin D. Sitler University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Sitler, Nevin D., "Selling St. Petersburg: John Lodwick and the promotion of a Florida paradise" (2006). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2704 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Selling St. Petersburg: John Lodwick and the Promotion of a Florida Paradise by Nevin D. Sitler A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Liberal Arts Department of Humanities College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Raymond O. Arsenault, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Gary R. Mormino, Ph.D. Christopher F. Meindl, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 13, 2006 Keywords: tourism, boosters, advertising, Sunshine City, publicity © Copyright 2006, Nevin D. Sitler i Table of Contents Abstract ii Introduction 1 Chapter One: Bridging the Gaps 13 Flagler and Plant – The Builders 15 Driving the Growth 17 Following the Dotted Line 19 Silver Tongues and Satisfied Customers 21
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway Expressway
    Gateway Expressway The Gateway Expressway project will create two What is Tampa Bay Next? new 4-lane elevated tolled roadways. The project is made up of two components: Tampa Bay Next 1) The construction of the Gateway Expressway, which will provide express connections from US 19 to is a program to I-275 and from the Bayside Bridge to I-275 modernize Tampa Bay’s transportation 2) The widening of I-275 to create express tolled lanes (one lane in each direction) from south of infrastructure and prepare for the future. Overall, the Gateway Expressway project will change the existing roadway system in order to enhance safety, add capacity, and improve mobility. Among the project improvements: • Construct SR 690, a new 4-lane tolled • Reconstruct sections of existing US 19 and The Program expressway connection from US 19 to west of 118th Avenue North, including new ramps and Includes: I-275. The tolling will be “static,” meaning the flyover structures. cost will remain the same at all hours. Interstate Modernization • Include various improvements to • Construct SR 686A, a new 4 lane elevated interchanges, intersections, and ramps within Transit tolled (static) expressway from the Bayside the project limits. Bike/Pedestrian Facilities Bridge (CR 611) to just west of I-275. Clearwater • Reconstruct existing Roosevelt Boulevard Complete Streets Old Tampa Bay from the Bayside Bridge to Ulmerton Road. 60 Courtney Campbell Causeway Bayside Bridge Transportation Innovation Freight Mobility Work in front of the St. Pete-Clearwater International (PIE) Airport includes: Howard Frankland Bridge East Bay Dr St. Pete/Clearwater 275 • Construction of a new airport access road International Airport Tampa Bay Next parallel to SR 686.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf of Mexico Tampa Bay Boater's and Angler's Guide (Version 2)
    Tampa Bay Boater's and Angler's Guide (version 2) 82° 00' 586 ough Co. 75 Pinellas Co. Hillsbor OLDSMAR 580 Safety eagrasses are Harbor vital nursery Mobbly Sligh Ave. and feeding areas for fish 1 Bay 2 28 ° Double 00' 00' and other marine animals. 580 275 ° Branch 28 Hillsborough Ave. Please protect them. Bay Hillsborough Ave. SAFETY . 3 HARBOR y Hwy Clearwater Tampa 56th St. If you run aground or International Dale Mabr ough River enter grass flats to fish, 19 Airport 4 22nd St. 4 McMullen Booth Rd. Hillsbor stop Courtney Campbell Causeway Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. ROCKY 301 your motor, tilt it up, and 60 POINT 1 Tampa pole or push your boat Bayside Bridge 6' 50th St. Adamo Dr. through. 60 Old Tampa Bay Kennedy Blvd. 60 Cr 6' osstown Expy HARBOR McKay ISLAND . 41 . e Blvd. Bay . 5 d Frankland Bridge Bayshor Howar Port y Hwy DAVIS BELLEAIR osstown Expy of SHORES W. Bay Dr. 275 Cr ISLAND Tampa Causeway Blvd. 6 E. Bay Dr. Dale Mabr Peter O'Knight 2 Airport J Roosevelt Blvd. St. Pete/Clearwater 7 Clearwater Harbor International Airport Port Sutton Gulf Blvd. 8 Ulmerton Rd. INDIAN PENDOLA Gandy Blvd. POINT ROCKS Blvd. e BEACH Alt 9 19 estshor BALLAST Walsingham Rd. 11 75 e Gandy Bridge l W POINT 10 o n i 3 m e S Trespassing 12 e Gandy Blvd. Hillsborough Spoil Island, k Interbay Blvd. No a Port Tampa L ows 4 Bay WEEDON ISLAND Seminole Blvd. 5 15 13 Alafia River INDIAN Riviera PICNIC Mac Dill SHORES Narr The 14 Bay ISLAND Air Force 16 Base Park Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interstate 275 Florida Frequently Asked Questions List Compiled by Edward Ringwald Revised January 2017
    The Interstate 275 Florida Frequently Asked Questions List Compiled by Edward Ringwald Revised January 2017 Many of you exploring Interstate275Florida.com have a lot of questions regarding how Interstate 275 came to be in the Tampa/St. Petersburg area among other things. Well, you have come to the right place! This frequently asked questions list should answer your questions. The questions are in no particular order. When was Interstate 275 in St. Petersburg built? Construction on Interstate 275 in St. Petersburg began in the early 1970’s starting at a point just south of the Ulmerton Road (SR 688) and M L King Street North interchange (Exit 31). From there the highway was built through St. Petersburg in short one to three mile segments from the early 1970’s to 1988 when the last segment of Interstate 275 was connected to the Sunshine Skyway Bridge, which was completed in 1987. Completed in 1983 and 1984 was the segment of Interstate 275 which connected the southern terminus of the Sunshine Skyway Bridge to its junction with Interstate 75 just outside Ellenton. The Sunshine Skyway’s approach roads were upgraded to interstate standards in 1989 that included the installation of overpasses over the rest area frontage roads and in 1994 with the replacement of two functionally obsolete drawbridges that were part of the original Sunshine Skyway. When was Interstate 275 in Tampa built? Interstate 275 in Tampa was originally constructed as a segment of Interstate 4 from today’s “Malfunction Junction” to the Ulmerton Road/M L King Street North interchange complex (Exit 31) in St.
    [Show full text]