Acoustic & Vibration Fundamentals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Acoustic & Vibration Fundamentals ACOUSTICS AND UMM… VIBRATION FUNDAMENTALS JEFF BOLDT | 2019-09-09 Introduction PRESENTATION INCLUDES • Physics of Sound • Understanding Decibels • Psychoacoustics • Acoustic Scales • Sound Power and Pressure PRESENTER Jeff Boldt, PE, FASHRAE, LEED® AP, HBDP, FPE Managing Principal – Director of Innovation & Quality at IMEG Corp. (>1,200 staff) Chair ASHRAE SSPC-90.1 MSC Former Chair ASHRAE 189.1 Acoustics Discussion Group Author AEDG Small Healthcare Facilities & AEDG Large Hospitals Member WHEA Code Committee Member SSPC 3.6, TC2.6, 5.2, 8.6 Search for “Jeff Boldt Engineering Nerd” Acoustical Background Two years graduate study through Heriot-Watt University in Acoustics, Vibration, and Noise Control Emphasis in building systems and noise control HVAC noise, generator enclosures, property line noise, Architectural Acoustics Has read many acoustical texts PHYSICS OF SOUND Physics of Sound Compression - Rarefraction Speed & Wave Equation Speed in air ~ 1100 fps ~ 750 mph Speed depends on • Material - mostly density (e.g. faster in metals) • Temperature V=f*L Velocity = frequency*wave length Frequency Audible Range ~ 16 Hz – 20 kHz (20,000 Hz) Audible Length ~ 68 ft – 5/8” 1,000 Hz ~ 1.1 feet Speech ~ 500 – 5,000 Hz • 2 to 0.2 feet Middle C = 262 Hz Grand Piano 28 – 4,186 Hz How People Describe Sounds Voice Frequencies Please put this into Excel and reprint the charts. Please only show the “normal” curves and include both in one graph. Volume Range HUMAN EAR HEARS OVER A VOLUME RANGE OF: • 140 dB (120 starts pain region) • 10^14 to 1 • 100 trillion to 1 • Accuracy of ~ +/- 5 dB • Comparable to a scale that weighs small ants (1 milligram) and the largest (110,000 ton) aircraft carriers, with reasonable USS Gerald Ford on the James River accuracy Reflection Specular = follows mirror rule Diffuse = random reflections Reflection is specular if surface irregularities are much smaller than the wave length Dissipative Absorption Friction converts noise to heat Typically fibrous materials Should be ~1/4 wavelength deep or held away from rigid surfaces May need covering for: • Cleanliness • Durability • Vapor barrier Reactive Absorption Tuned frequencies Very narrow band if not dampened Best for narrow frequencies Vehicle mufflers Perforated panels – small holes Can’t equal absorptive performance Gypsum board - Transformers Reactive Absorption Mufflers Dissipative (“packed” muffler) Reactive muffler Active Absorption Active • Measure and counter noise • Needs to be a controlled situation • Digisonix was the last manufacturer I know of • Works best at low frequencies • Absorptive silencers were cheaper, except maybe at very low frequencies DECIBELS Decibels Used to handle large ranges Decibel is a ratio, not a quantity Alexander Graham Bell invented the Bel Notation is dB, dBA, etc. Sound Power & Pressure Lw = SwL = Sound Power = energy • Lw = 10*log(watts/10^-12W) dB • Lw = 10*log(watts) + 120 dB • Like Lumens Lp = SpL = Sound Pressure • Lp = 10*log(p^2/Pref^2) dB • Lp = 20*log(p/Pref) dB • Like Footcandles At 1 kHz 0 dB is audible (youngsters) At 1 kHz 120 dB is painful More Decibels Original energy = Original dB 1 Double energy = +3 dB 2 4X energy = +6 dB 4 10X energy = +10 dB 10 100X energy = +20 dB 100 Etc. Adding each 10 dB adds a zero • 120 dB is 1 followed by 12 zeros • Them zeros ain’t nothing • Jethro Bodine understood… Adding Decibels Divide each number by 10 Take the anti-log (10^X) of each number Add the numbers Take the 10-log of the sum Multiply by 10 Spreadsheet has this feature Create in Excel so we own © to this Decibel Addition Graph Sound Pressure Sound Pressure Level Sound Source (Decibels, A-weighted) Saturn Rocket 194 Ram Jet 160 Propeller Aircraft 140 Threshold of Pain 135 Riveter 120 Heavy Truck 100 Noisy Office 80 Heavy Traffic 80 Conversational Speech 60 Private Office 50 Quite Resident 40 Recording Studio 30 Leaves Rustling 20 Hearing threshold good ears at frequency of maximum sensitivity 10 Hearing threshold excellent ears at frequency of maximum response 0 PSYCHOACOUSTICS Psychoacoustics Octave = double frequency Preferred center frequencies • 31.5 Hz • 63 Hz • 125 Hz • 250 Hz • 500 Hz • 1K, 2K, 4K, 8K • 16K Psychoacoustics Hyperacusis = poor ability to accommodate large volume ranges • Most common in elderly and young Sense of direction is mostly from phase effects, but also from shadowing • Concert hall design • Vertical symmetry – Dolby Psychoacoustics Hearing loss is either: • Conductivity – mechanical failure • All solvable • Can you make a graphic of a ME ruling the Universe? • Sensory-Neuro – electrical failure • Sensory-Neuro is more common • Sensory-Neuro is irreparable • Can you make a graphic of a despondent EE? Psychoacoustics Hearing loss is either: • Conductivity – mechanical failure • All can be repaired • Sensory-Neuro – electrical failure • Sensory-Neuro is more common • Sensory-Neuro is irreparable Psychoacoustics Hearing loss is either: • Conductivity – mechanical failure • All can be repaired • Sensory-Neuro – electrical failure • Sensory-Neuro is more common • Sensory-Neuro is irreparable • Clearly demonstrates the superiority of mechanical engineers Hearing Loss – Women 60 yrs 4,000 Hz -15 dB Hearing Loss – Men 60 yrs 4,000 Hz -32 dB Honey I can barely hear you Voice Frequencies Recreate graph Information Most information is in consonants Consonants are high frequency Vowels add volume and tone Honey I can hear you – but all I get is WA-WA- ACOUSTIC SCALES Acoustic Scales Everybody’s got one • Beranek has the most… Phons Phons = equal loudness contours Single number is 1K perceived loudness Decibel scale Phons and Sones Sensitivity much flatter for loud noise Most people consider +10 dB double volume 1 Sone = 40 Phons 2 Sones = 50 Phons Etc. Wikipedia = best Sone definition Pink and White Noise Pink noise has equal power per octave White noise has equal power per Hertz 80 70 60 Pink Noise 50 White Noise 40 dB 30 20 10 0 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Hz Weighing Scales dB(A) is the most common one-number acoustic value • dBA resembles 40 Phon contour • OSHA uses dBA dB(B) is for louder sounds • Resembles the 80 Phon contour • Never used dB(C) is for even louder sounds • dBC is nearly unweighted • C and “flat” are often the same on meters dBA, B, and C Weighting Flat weights all frequencies equally dBC slightly filters high and low frequencies to simulate the sensitivity of the (young) human ear at high vlolumes. dB(B) is between A&C, but is seldom used. It simulates the human ear at moderate volumes. dBA filters high and especially low frequencies to simulate the sensitivity of the (young) human ear at low volumes. dBA Sensitivity Curve 30 25 20 dBA Curve 15 10 5 0 -5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 RTA App NC (Noise Criteria) Another one-number index Proposed by Beranek Based on the worst octave Emphasizes annoying high frequencies Used by AMCA for noise ratings of grilles, registers, and diffusers Used by AHRI to rate VAV boxes NC Curves Worst case determines rating PNC & NCB Criteria PNC = Preferred NC • Improvement over NC • Very seldom used NCB • Lowered 4K & 8K limits • Added 32 and 63 Hz criteria • Proposed by Beranek in 1989 NCB Curves RC (Room Criteria) Developed by ASHRAE Not as common as dBA or NC Gives information about character of sound • RC-35R = Rumble • RC-35H = Hiss RC Curves RC Mark II Latest ASHRAE noise index Improves on RC, but is more complex Very strict criteria for “Normal” frequency distribution E.g. RC-35 (N) Spreadsheet Capabilities Calculates the following: • Unweighted dB • dBA • NC • RC Mark II • Outdoor property line noise – very fast Spreadsheet Example 1 SOUND CALCULATIONS Octave Center Frequency (Hertz) 6 2 1 2 5 2 5 0 5 0 0 1 K 2 K 4 K 8 K Sound Pressure at Chosen Location (Lp) 69.0 46.0 46.0 4 4.0 40.0 37.0 30.0 20.0 Total dB at Selected Location 69.1 dB dBA Calculations A-W eighting Conversion -2 6 .2 -1 6 .1 - 8 .6 - 3 .2 0 . 0 1 .2 1 . 0 - 1 . 1 A-W eighted Sound Pressure (LpA) 4 2 .8 2 9 .9 3 7 .4 4 0 .8 4 0 .0 3 8 .2 3 1 .0 1 8 .9 dBA at Chosen Location (Perceived Volum e) 47.4 dBA RC M ark II Calculations Conversion to RC Contour -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 O ctave Band RC Ratings 49 31 36 39 40 42 40 15 D eviation from R C R ating 9 -9 -4 -1 0 2 0 -25 Spectral Deviation factor ranges LF MF HF Spectral D eviations 8 .7 -3.9 0.4 Q AI (Q uality Assessm ent Index) 1 2 .6 Q AI > 10 is likely to cause com plaints at m arginal noise Descriptions of RC abbreviations: 49.0 (N) denotes Neutral character sound, which is pr eferred. Q AI <5 is considered neutral. (LF) denotes that the sound is dom inated by Low Frequency Rum ble. (M F) denotes that the sound is dom inated by M id- Frequency Roar. (HF) denotes that the sound is dom inated by High -Frequency Hiss. LFB denotes likely m oderate but perceptible soun d-induced ceiling/wall vibration. LFA denotes likely noticeable sound-induced ceiling/w all vibration. RC M ark II Rating (per ASHRAE 2003 Applications - 47.28) RC 40 LF LFB Noise Criteria (NC) Calculations Peak NC curve each octave band is below 50 30 40 40 40 40 35 25 NC is not an appropriate rating scale for values ov er N C 50. N oise C riteria R ating = NC 50 OUTDOOR NOISE Temperature Refraction Make better graphic Directivity Directivity Directivity = Q • Q - Multiplier Application • 1 +0 dB Spherical • 2 +3 dB Ground (normal) • 4 +6 dB One wall • 8 +9 dB Two walls • 12 +12 dB roof also = megaphone Outdoor Shadowing Outdoor Barrier Effect Barriers • Noise reduction depends on extra distance divided by wavelength • NR = 10*log(3+20* DL*freq/1100) Title 35 Emergency Generator Other Outdoor Effects Humidity – low RH attenuates (slightly) Foliage – negligible Ground absorption Wind and temperature Humidity vs.
Recommended publications
  • Model-Based Processing for Underwater Acoustic Arrays
    Books NEW Book from ASA Press ASA Press is a meritorious imprint of the Acoustical Society of America in collaboration with the major international publisher Springer Science + Business Media. All new books that are published with the ASA Press imprint will be announced in Acoustics Today. Individuals who have ideas for books should feel free to contact the ASA Publications Office to discuss their ideas. Model-Based Processing can be recursive either in space or time, depending on the for Underwater Acoustic application.This is done for three reasons. First, the Kalman Arrays filter provides a natural framework for the inclusion of phys- Author: Edmund J. Sullivan ical models in a processing scheme. Second, it allows poorly ISBN: 978-3-319-17556-0 known model parameters to be jointly estimated along with Pages: 113 pp., 25 illus., the quantities of interest. This is important, since in cer- 14 illus. in color tain areas of array processing already in use, such as those Available formats: based on matched-field processing, the so-called mismatch Softcover, $54.99, problem either degrades performance or, indeed, prevents eBook, MyCopy any solution at all. Thirdly, such a unification provides a for- Publication Date: 2015 mal means of quantifying the performance improvement. Publisher: Springer The term model-based will be strictly defined as the use of International Publishing physics-based models as a means of introducing a priori in- formation. This leads naturally to viewing the method as a Bayesian processor. Short expositions of estimation theory This monograph presents a unified approach to model- and acoustic array theory are presented, followed by a pre- based processing for underwater acoustic arrays.
    [Show full text]
  • HP-2 Acoustic Design Guide
    ACOUSTIC PRODUCT FAMILY Specifying Design Guide Our in-house, custom 7 STEPS TO SPECIFY Robust Examples including APPLICATION DRAWINGS Informative intro to the world of ACOUSTICS Table of Contents INTRODUCTION � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3 STEPS OVERVIEW � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4 MATERIAL TABLE � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5 REVERBERATION TIME TABLE � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 6 PRODUCT TABLE � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8 EXAMPLE 1 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 9 EXAMPLE 2 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �12 WORKSHEET � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]
  • Basics of Acoustics Contents
    BASICS OF ACOUSTICS CONTENTS 1. preface 03 2. room acoustics versus building acoustics 04 3. fundamentals of acoustics 05 3.1 Sound 05 3.2 Sound pressure 06 3.3 Sound pressure level and decibel scale 06 3.4 Sound pressure of several sources 07 3.5 Frequency 08 3.6 Frequency ranges relevant for room planning 09 3.7 Wavelengths of sound 09 3.8 Level values 10 4. room acoustic parameters 11 4.1 Reverberation time 11 4.2 Sound absorption 14 4.3 Sound absorption coefficient and reverberation time 16 4.4 Rating of sound absorption 16 5. index 18 2 1. PREFACE Noise or unwanted sounds is perceived as disturbing and annoying in many fields of life. This can be observed in private as well as in working environments. Several studies about room acoustic conditions and annoyance through noise show the relevance of good room acoustic conditions. Decreasing success in school class rooms or affecting efficiency at work is often related to inadequate room acoustic conditions. Research results from class room acoustics have been one of the reasons to revise German standard DIN 18041 on “Acoustic quality of small and medium-sized room” from 1968 and decrease suggested reverberation time values in class rooms with the new 2004 version of the standard. Furthermore the standard gave a detailed range for the frequency dependence of reverberation time and also extended the range of rooms to be considered in room acoustic design of a building. The acoustic quality of a room, better its acoustic adequacy for each usage, is determined by the sum of all equipment and materials in the rooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Martinho, Claudia. 2019. Aural Architecture Practice: Creative Approaches for an Ecology of Affect
    Martinho, Claudia. 2019. Aural Architecture Practice: Creative Approaches for an Ecology of Affect. Doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London [Thesis] https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/26374/ The version presented here may differ from the published, performed or presented work. Please go to the persistent GRO record above for more information. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Goldsmiths, University of London via the following email address: [email protected]. The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated. For more information, please contact the GRO team: [email protected] !1 Aural Architecture Practice Creative Approaches for an Ecology of Affect Cláudia Martinho Goldsmiths, University of London PhD Music (Sonic Arts) 2018 !2 The work presented in this thesis has been carried out by myself, except as otherwise specified. December 15, 2017 !3 Acknowledgments Thanks to: my family, Mazatzin and Sitlali, for their support and understanding; my PhD thesis’ supervisors, Professor John Levack Drever and Dr. Iris Garrelfs, for their valuable input; and everyone who has inspired me and that took part in the co-creation of this thesis practical case studies. This research has been supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology fellowship. Funding has also been granted from the Department of Music and from the Graduate School at Goldsmiths University of London, the arts organisations Guimarães Capital of Culture 2012, Invisible Places and Lisboa Soa, to support the creation of the artworks presented in this research as practical case studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverberation and the Art of Architectural Acoustics
    Sabine and reverberation 11/29/02 11:21 AM Reverberation and the Art of Architectural Acoustics © 2002 Robert Sekuler (revised) In 1895 Harvard University, that other school situated on the Charles River, opened its Fogg Art Museum. This wonderful building, still much used today, contained an equally wonderful, large lecture hall. Audiences flocked in, eager to experience intellectual enlightenment in beautiful new surroundings. But there was a large, ugly fly in this intellectual ointment: No one could understand any of the lectures that were given in Fogg lecture hall. And it wasn't because the lectures were too esoteric, or because the lecturers mumbled into their beards, or because the students were too distracted. The problem was acoustics and hearing. For help, Harvard turned to one of its own, Wallace Clement Sabine (photo), then a 27 year-old Assistant Professor of Physics. To that point in his career, Sabine had distinguished himself primarily through his teaching; research productivity was not his strongest suit. Even though Sabine had not previously worked with this sort of problem, his writings show that he was a remarkably quick study and a truly dedicated scientist. His published work also provides a model of good, clear scientific prose. After diagnosing and then solving Harvard's problem with the Fogg lecture room, Sabine devoted the rest of his career to the new field that he had virtually created in the process: architectural acoustics. First, Sabine noted that when anyone spoke in the Fogg Museum lecture room, even at normal conversational levels, the sound of his or her voice remained audible in the room for several seconds thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Room Acoustics Education in Interior Architecture Programs: a Course Structure Proposal
    Room acoustics education in interior architecture programs: A course structure proposal Kitapci, Kivanc1 Çankaya University Mimarlık Fakültesi, İç Mimarlık Bölümü. Çukurambar Mah. Öğretmenler Cad. No: 14, 06530 Çankaya, Ankara, Türkiye ABSTRACT Soundscape research alters the notion of room acoustics from a physical phenomenon to a new multidisciplinary approach that concerns human perception of the acoustic environment, in addition to the physical calculations and measurements. Many interior architecture programs include courses that specifically focus on room acoustics. Although a brief introduction to the technical aspects of room acoustics is considered mandatory, the current course structure does not deliver sufficient information on the human perception of the acoustic environment. Therefore, the aim of the study is to reconsider the structure of room acoustic courses and present a brand- new room acoustics course structure proposal for the interior architecture programs. The study consists of two main phases. In the first phase, a database of all courses that include various topics on room acoustics is prepared through examination of the course descriptions of all undergraduate and graduate interior architecture programs in Turkey. In the second phase, the revisions to the current state of the room acoustics course structures are advised through an in-depth systematic literature review on the research area of soundscapes. Preliminary results and the initial course structure model will be presented at the conference. Keywords: Acoustic education, Soundscape, Interior architecture I-INCE Classification of Subject Number: 07 1. INTRODUCTION Since the beginning of the 20th century, vision-centred approaches dominate the higher-education curriculums of design disciplines such as architecture, interior architecture, industrial design, and city and regional planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Acoustics - Andres Porta Contreras, Catalina E
    FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICS – Vol. I - Principles Of Acoustics - Andres Porta Contreras, Catalina E. Stern Forgach PRINCIPLES OF ACOUSTICS Andrés Porta Contreras Department of Physics, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Catalina E. Stern Forgach Department of Physics, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Keywords: Acoustics, Ear, Diffraction, Doppler effect, Music, Sound, Standing Waves, Ultrasound, Vibration, Waves. Contents 1. Introduction 2. History 3. Basic Concepts 3.1. What is Sound? 3.2. Characteristics of a Wave 3.3. Qualities of Sound 3.3.1. Loudness 3.3.2. Pitch 3.3.3. Timbre 3.4. Mathematical Description of a Pure Sound Wave 3.5. Doppler Effect 3.6. Reflection and Refraction 3.7. Superposition and Interference 3.8. Standing Waves 3.9. Timbre, Modes and Harmonics 3.10. Diffraction 4. Physiological and Psychological Effects of Sound 4.1. Anatomy and Physiology of Hearing. 4.1.1. Outer Ear 4.1.2. Middle Ear 4.1.3. Inner Ear 5. ApplicationsUNESCO – EOLSS 5.1. Ultrasound 5.2. Medicine 5.3. Noise Control 5.4. MeteorologySAMPLE and Seismology CHAPTERS 5.5. Harmonic Synthesis 5.6. Acoustical Architecture and Special Building Rooms Design 5.7. Speech and Voice 5.8. Recording and Reproduction 5.9. Other Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICS – Vol. I - Principles Of Acoustics - Andres Porta Contreras, Catalina E. Stern Forgach Summary The chapter begins with a brief history of acoustics from Pythagoras to the present times. Then the main physical and mathematical principles on acoustics are reviewed. A general description of waves is given first, then the characteristics of sound and some of the most common phenomena related to acoustics like echo, diffraction and the Doppler effect are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustics 101 for Architects a Presentation of Acoustical Terminology and Concepts Relating Directly to the Design and Construction of an Architectural Space
    Acoustics 101 for Architects A presentation of acoustical terminology and concepts relating directly to the design and construction of an architectural space. Low-tech descriptions, explanations, and examples. By: Michael Fay This essay is tailored to the one group of people who have more influence over a building's acoustics than any other; architects. The focus is on Architectural Acoustics, a field that is broader than most imagine. To do justice to the theme, we must briefly touch on many subordinate topics, most having a synergetic relationship bonding architecture and sound. This paper is based on fundamentals, not perfection. It covers most of the basics, and explores many modern and esoteric matters as well. You will be introduced to interesting and analytical subjects; some you may know, some you may never have considered. Here are a few examples of what you'll find by reading on: . What is sound and why is it so hard to manage or control? . The length of low- and high-frequency sound waves vary by as much as 400:1. Why does this disparity matter? . How and why do various audible frequencies behave differently when interacting with various materials, structures, shapes and finishes? . There are three acoustical tools available to both the architect and the acoustician. What are they? How can they benefit or hinder the work of each craft? . Room geometry: Why some shapes are much better than others. Examples and explanations. Reverberation and echo: How do they differ? Which is better, or worse, and why? How much is too much, or too little? .
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Introduction
    HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION The arts of music, drama, and public discourse have both influenced and been influenced by the acoustics and architecture of their presentation environments. It is theorized that African music and dance evolved a highly complex rhythmic character due, in part, to its being performed outdoors-rather than the melodic line of early European music. Wallace Clement Sabine (1868–1919), an early pioneer in architectural acoustics, felt that the development of a tonal scale in Europe rather than in Africa could be ascribed to the differences in living environment. In Europe, prehistoric tribes sought shelter in caves and later constructed increasingly large and reverberant temples and churches. Gregorian chant grew out of the acoustical characteristics of the gothic cathedrals, and subsequently Baroque music was written to accommodate the churches of the time. In the latter half of the twentieth century both theater design and performing arts became technology driven, particularly with the invention of the electronic systems that made the film and television industries possible. With the development of computer programs capable of creating the look and sound of any environment, a work of art can now not only influence, but also define the space it occupies. 1.1 GREEK AND ROMAN PERIOD (650 bc - AD 400) Early Cultures The origin of music, beginning with some primeval song around an ancient campfire, is impossible to date. There is evidence (Sandars, 1968) to suggest that instruments existed as early as 13,000 bc. The understanding of music and consonance dates back at least to 3000 bc, when the Chinese philosopher Fohi wrote two monographs on the subject (Skudrzyk, 1954).
    [Show full text]
  • Why Acoustics Matter
    Please add relevant logo here Why Acoustic Matter: Demystifying Noise Control in Buildings Randy D. Waldeck, PE Disclaimer: This presentation was developed by a third party and is not funded by WoodWorks or the Softwood Lumber Board. “The Wood Products Council” is This course is registered with a Registered Provider with The AIA CES for continuing American Institute of Architects professional education. As Continuing Education Systems such, it does not include (AIA/CES), Provider #G516. content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of Credit(s) earned on completion construction or any method or of this course will be reported to manner of handling, using, AIA CES for AIA members. distributing, or dealing in any Certificates of Completion for material or product. both AIA members and non-AIA __________________________________ members are available upon Questions related to specific materials, request. methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation. Copyright Materials This presentation is protected by US and International Copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, display and use of the presentation without written permission of the speaker is prohibited. © CSDA Design Group 2017 Course Description Acoustics is an invisible element that designers often overlook, yet sound deeply affects our daily lives— which is why sustainable design principles incorporate acoustical elements to improve building occupant health, safety, functionality, and comfort. This session will provide an overview of design features and strategies for achieving an appropriate balance of noise control in wood-frame buildings. Techniques for reducing the intrusion of environmental noise will be reviewed, and selection of acoustical components and wood-frame assemblies discussed in the context of occupant/tenant separation in buildings such as apartments, hotels, medical offices, schools and retail.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustical News—Usa
    ACOUSTICAL NEWS—USA Elaine Moran Acoustical Society of America, Suite 1NO1, 2 Huntington Quadrangle, Melville, NY 11747-4502 Editor’s Note: Readers of the journal are encouraged to submit news items on awards, appointments, and other activities about themselves or their colleagues. Deadline dates for news items and notices are 2 months prior to publication. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 ͑3͒, September 20060001-4966/2006/120͑3͒/1133/20/$22.50 © 2006 Acoustical Society of America 1133 1134 J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 120, No. 3, September 2006 Annual Reports of Technical Committees Award in Animal Bioacoustics for her paper “Sound production patterns from humpback whales in a high latitude foraging area.” In Providence, we ͑See October issue for additional report͒ had two student paper award winners, Charlotte Kotas ͑Georgia Institute of Technology͒ for her paper “Are acoustically induced flows relevant in fish Acoustical Oceanography hearing?” and Anthony Petrites ͑Brown University͒ for his paper “Echolo- Fall 2005 Meeting (Minneapolis, MN). The Technical Committee on cating big brown bats shorten interpulse intervals when flying in high-clutter Acoustical Oceanography ͑AO͒ sponsored two special sessions: ͑1͒ “Inver- environments.” Lee Miller ͑University of Southern Denmark͒ and Bertel sion Using Ambient Noise Sources,” organized by Peter Gerstoft ͑Marine Møhl ͑Aarhus University͒ were both elevated to Fellow status. Physical Laboratory, Scripps͒; and ͑2͒ “Ocean Ecosystem Measurements,” AB sponsored or cosponsored three special sessions at the Minneapo- cosponsored by Animal Bioacoustics ͑AB͒ and organized by Whit Au ͑Ha- lis meeting. These include Cognition in the Acoustic Behavior of Animals waii Inst. of Marine Biology͒ and Van Holliday ͑BAE Systems͒.
    [Show full text]
  • Helmholtz Resonators – Piezoelectric Effect • Harvester Design
    HARVESTING ENERGY USING PIEZOELECTRICS EXCITED BY HELMHOLTZ RESONANCE Tyler Van Buren -with- Prof. Alexander Smits, Lindsay Graff, Zachary McCourt, Emile Oshima, and Jason Mulderrig SMITS’ LAB: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH Alexander Smits Eugene Higgins Professor of MAE Artificial atmospheric boundary layer Stratified flows Vertical axis wind turbines • Development of artificial atmospheric boundary layer • Turbulent boundary • generator for wind layers with temperature Many potential benefits tunnel testing gradients • Some drawbacks (e.g., • Occurs during dynamic stall, scaling to • How do model large sizes) buildings/structures transitions between day and night • Better understanding interact with of dynamic stall and atmospheric flows? • On off shore breezes performance ARE THERE OTHER VIABLE WAYS TO COLLECT WIND ENERGY? Helmholtz harvester • Fundamentals: – Helmholtz resonators – Piezoelectric effect • Harvester design Applications • Urban environments – Tall buildings, personal houses • Powering remote sensors Wind tunnel studies • Feasibility tests – Does it produce meaningful energy? • Better resonance – Can we improve it? • Effect of geometry THE CONCEPT HELMHOLTZ HARVESTER Turn a surrounding wind into a vibrating pressure field to be converted to electricity and collected Helmholtz Resonator Piezoelectric Effect HELMHOLTZ RESONATOR • Consider a container full of air with a small opening at MASS OF AIR IN NECK the top m • The air in the neck acts as a COMPRESSION OF AIR IN CAVITY mass • The air inside the container acts as a spring. • Apply a disturbance of pressure This results in a characteristic frequency based on container geometry and fluid properties A: Orifice Area V: Cavity Volume L: Orifice Neck Length c: speed of sound in air HELMHOLTZ RESONATOR • Consider a container full of air MASS OF AIR IN NECK with a small opening at the top m COMPRESSION • The air in the neck acts as a mass OF AIR IN CAVITY • The air inside the container acts as a spring.
    [Show full text]