Review: Shulamith Firestone, the Dialectic of Sex

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review: Shulamith Firestone, the Dialectic of Sex Review: Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex Madeleine Johansson wax. What she was doing was much more dangerous.’1 Firestone attempts to analyse in-depth the nature of sexual oppression and its ori- gins, in order to argue for the possibility of feminist revolution and how this can be achieved. Her analysis, she claims, is based on the Marxist method of dialectics, up- dated through the use of Freudian theory. The book also deals with the oppression of children, racism and a possible future so- ciety. She has some great and thought- provoking insights, particularly in the chap- ter on childhood. The book was a signif- icant contribution to radical feminism and has remained very influential until this day. Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex Verso 2015 £9.99 Compared to the mainstream liberal femi- nism of today, Shulamith Firestone’s work is a breath of fresh air arguing for a com- The re-publication of the feminist clas- plete destruction of ’patriarchy’ and capital- sic by Shulamith Firestone is very timely, ism. There are, however, serious flaws to now that we are experiencing another wave her method and conclusions as well as some of feminism sweeping the globe with a whole fairly disturbing notions regarding sexuality. new generation of young women taking an Before moving on to the main review, it’s interest in feminist issues. The book was important to highlight the context Firestone first published in 1970 and was described as was writing in. The social movements in the follows by Susan Faludi in the New Yorker 1960’s inspired the growth of the far left in in 2014 in her obituary to Firestone: the US, as well as women’s organisations and black civil rights groups. This ‘New Left’ in- Dialectic was both lauded and cluded a mixed bag of student groups, anar- excoriated, often in the same re- chists and hippies, and many of its leaders view; the Times called its au- were influenced by Maoism. But, by 1970, thor ‘brilliant’ and ‘preposter- this alliance of anti-establishment forces be- ous.’ It was ridiculed on talk gan to break apart with some being involved shows as it climbed the best- in terrorism (The Weathermen) while others seller list, and was cast as ‘the moved to the right towards the Democratic little red book for women’ while Party. Many young women who had got in- it was changing world views in volved with the ‘New Left’ came up against un-red female America. Millett, appalling sexism, and when they began to whose book Sexual Politics ap- question this type of behaviour they were peared the same year as Dialec- dismissed and vilified.2 One of these women tic, told me, ‘I was taking on the was Shulamith Firestone, who at the age of obvious male chauvinists. Shulie 22 proposed resolutions on women’s rights was taking on the whole ball of at the 1967 ‘National Conference for a New 1http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/04/15/death-of-a-revolutionary?currentPage=all accessed 24/05/15 2http://disruptingdinnerparties.com/2014/05/29/breaking-away-to-come-back-new-left- sexism-radical-feminism/, accessed 24/06/15 67 Politics’ in Chicago and was literally given a In one sentence she argues ‘[b]efore we ‘pat on the head’ and completely dismissed.3 can act to change a situation, however, we A few years later she was forced off a stage must know how it has arisen and evolved, to howls of verbal sexist abuse. Not sur- and through what institutions it now oper- prisingly, Firestone turned her back on the ates. Engels’‘[We must] examine the historic left and instead went on to co-found a num- succession of events from which the antag- ber of radical feminist organisations, such onism has sprung in order to discover the as the Redstockings and New York Radical conditions thus created the means of end- Women. The appalling attitude of the left ing the conflict’5.Here she appears to be ad- and their inability to take feminist issues se- vocating for a historical materialist analytic riously, led Firestone to reject much of left- method but she then goes on to argue that ist ideas and Marxism. So whilst I make ‘[t]he division yin and yang pervades all cul- quite harsh criticism of Firestone’s work I ture, history, economics, nature itself; mod- have sympathy for her and the path which ern Western versions of sex discrimination led her to writing it. are only the most recent layer6’ completely contradicting her earlier statement. Fire- Firestone’s method stone argue that we need to look at history and the historical development of oppression At the very outset of the book Firestone but then asserts that sexual oppression is not claims to stand in the tradition of Marx historical but rather biological, existing even utilising his dialectical method. However in the animal kingdom and therefore cannot she immediately rejects the very foundation be explained by looking at history. of Marx’s dialectic - historical materialism. Historical materialism is the basis of Marx- She completely rejects Engels’ theory of ism, and it means that we understand that the development of gender hierarchy in his the world actually exists and is not just The Origin of the Family, Private Property in our heads (materialism), and that soci- and the State where he links it to the rise ety changes and develops throughout his- of class society. Since the publication of tory. Firestone partially admits this, and The Dialectic of Sex a significant amount of even at certain points in the book argues research has been conducted by anthropol- this strongly. However she also rejects his- ogists such as Eleanor Burke Leacock and torical materialism in favour of a Freudian Christine Ward Gailey proving the correct- idealism combined with a crude biological ness of Engels’ general argument. Unfortu- determinism. She argues that: nately at the time of writing, none of this research would have been available to Fire- ...we are dealing with a larger stone. Instead, Firestone argues that sex- problem, with an oppression ual oppression stems only from the biologi- that goes back beyond recorded cal difference between male and female ie the history to the animal kingdom it- female’s ability to bear children. ‘These bi- self. In creating such an analysis ological contingencies of the human family we can learn a lot from Marx and cannot be covered over by anthropological Engels: not their literal opinions sophistries. Anyone observing animals mat- about women - about the condi- ing, reproducing, and caring for their young tion of women as an oppressed will have a hard time accepting the ’cultural class they know next to nothing, relativity’ line.’7 Not only does she neglect recognizing it only where it over- anthropological studies of early human so- laps with economics - but rather cieties in one sentence, but she also disre- their analytic method.’4 gards the difference between human beings 3http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/04/15/death-of-a-revolutionary, accessed 24/06/15 4The Dialectic of Sex, Shulamith Firestone, Verso books 2015 5ibid 6ibid 7ibid 68 and animals; the key difference being the so- from Venus’. According to Firestone, and cial nature of human beings and our ability actually most misogynists too, gender roles to shape and change nature. are a consequence of biology and hormones, rather than society. I have shown above how she rejects the Despite this biological determinism historical aspect of historical materialism (combined with Freudian idealism), which but then she also goes on to reject the ma- can often lead to a pessimism regarding the terialist aspect when she says: ‘There is a ability to defeat oppression because if op- level of reality that does not stem from eco- pression comes from biology then we would nomics... reality is psycho-sexual...’8 The have to change our biology to achieve free- crude biological determinism which leads to dom. Firestone argues that ‘...the precon- an ahistorical understanding of sexual op- ditions for feminist revolution exist-indeed, pression goes hand in hand with the idealism the situation is beginning to demand such a of Freudianism - the theory that human be- revolution.’12 This at least gives the book a ings’ emotions and psyche, formed by sexual sense of hope and possibility which at times repression, creates power-structures (and is refreshing. I will discuss her vision for subsequently oppression) in society. Her bi- a feminist revolution and a future society ological determinism is evident throughout later. the book, particularly in her discussions of love, culture and science where she among other things argue ‘That men can’t love. A history of the women’s move- (Male hormones?? Women traditionally ex- ment pect and accept an emotional invalidism in them that they would find intolerable in a Firestone’s book attempts to deal with a woman.)’9 She also claims that ‘...we can broad range of issues around feminism, sex- hardly find a relationship of women to sci- uality and oppression and she also outlines ence worthy of discussion’10 apparently be- the history of the women’s movement and its cause ‘...the empirical method specifically various components. She correctly criticises demands the exclusion of the scientist’s per- many of the conservative feminists through- sonality from his research.’11 Firestone ar- out history and argues that their ‘stress on gues that this is because women are more equality with men - legal, economic, etc., engaged with emotions and therefore are un- within the given system - rather than liber- able to use ‘cold’ scientific methods.
Recommended publications
  • 1 GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought TIMES to BE CONFIRMED
    GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought TIMES TO BE CONFIRMED: provisionally, Tuesday 1:30-2:45, Thursday TBC Fall Semester 2020 Professor Katrina Forrester Office Hours: TBC E-mail: [email protected] Teaching Fellows: Celia Eckert, Soren Dudley, Kierstan Carter, Eve O’Connor Course Description: What is feminism? What is patriarchy? What and who is a woman? How does gender relate to sexuality, and to class and race? Should housework be waged, should sex be for sale, and should feminists trust the state? This course is an introduction to feminist political thought since the mid-twentieth century. It introduces students to classic texts of late twentieth-century feminism, explores the key arguments that have preoccupied radical, socialist, liberal, Black, postcolonial and queer feminists, examines how these arguments have changed over time, and asks how debates about equality, work, and identity matter today. We will proceed chronologically, reading texts mostly written during feminism’s so-called ‘second wave’, by a range of influential thinkers including Simone de Beauvoir, Shulamith Firestone, bell hooks and Catharine MacKinnon. We will examine how feminists theorized patriarchy, capitalism, labor, property and the state; the relationship of claims of sex, gender, race, and class; the development of contemporary ideas about sexuality, identity, and gender; and how and whether these ideas change how fundamental problems in political theory are understood. 1 Course Requirements: Undergraduate students: 1. Participation (25%): a. Class Participation (15%) Class Participation is an essential part of making a section work. Participation means more than just attendance. You are expected to come to each class ready to discuss the assigned material.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks by Redstockings Speaker Marisa Figueiredo Shulamith Firestone Memorial September 23, 2012
    Remarks by Redstockings speaker Marisa Figueiredo Shulamith Firestone Memorial September 23, 2012 In 1978, at the age of 16, while In high school, I lived in Akron, Ohio. I went to to the public library on weekends and on one shelf were three books in a row that changed my life forever and are the reason I am here today: Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex, Shulamith Firestone's The Dialectic of Sex The Case for Feminist Revolution, and Redstockings' Feminist Revolution. With my consciousness raised to the point of passionately identifying myself as a radical feminist in the tradition each book represented, I ardently wanted to connect with Shulamith Firestone and Redstockings , so I wrote to both. I heard back from Redstockings, not Shulamith, and since 1984, I have been active in Redstockings. On May Day in 1986, Redstockings organized a Memorial for Simone de Beauvoir and I felt deeply honored when asked by Kathie Sarachild to read Shulamith's Firestone's tribute she had sent to the Memorial. It was several sentences in Shulamith's beautiful handwriting saying that Simone de Beauvoir had fired her youthful ambitions at age 16 and my heart was pounding as I read it, because Shulamith had fired my youthful ambitions at age 16, too! In the early 1990s, Kathie Sarachild introduced me to Shulamith Firestone, and I remember immediately feeling Shulamith's intensity of observation and perception of details unnoticed by others. All this despite her physical vulnerability that overwhelmed me, which I soon learned from her, resulted from side effects of her medication and a recent hospitalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Scroll Down for Article
    This article was downloaded by: [University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Libraries] On: 1 February 2009 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 792081565] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Communication Review Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713456253 Sexual Politics from Barnard to Las Vegas Barbara G. Brents a a Department of Sociology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA Online Publication Date: 01 July 2008 To cite this Article Brents, Barbara G.(2008)'Sexual Politics from Barnard to Las Vegas',The Communication Review,11:3,237 — 246 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/10714420802306593 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10714420802306593 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Shulamith Firestone 1945–2012 2
    Shulamith Firestone 1945–2012 2 Photograph courtesy of Lori Hiris. New York, 1997. Memorial for Shulamith Firestone St. Mark’s Church in the Bowery, Parish Hall September 23, 2012 Program 4:00–6:00 pm Laya Firestone Seghi Eileen Myles Kathie Sarachild Jo Freeman Ti-Grace Atkinson Marisa Figueiredo Tributes from: Anne Koedt Peggy Dobbins Bev Grant singing May the Work That I Have Done Speak For Me Kate Millett Linda Klein Roxanne Dunbar Robert Roth 3 Open floor for remembrances Lori Hiris singing Hallelujah Photograph courtesy of Lori Hiris. New York, 1997. Reception 6:00–6:30 4 Shulamith Firestone Achievements & Education Writer: 1997 Published Airless Spaces. Semiotexte Press 1997. 1970–1993 Published The Dialectic of Sex, Wm. Morrow, 1970, Bantam paperback, 1971. – Translated into over a dozen languages, including Japanese. – Reprinted over a dozen times up through Quill trade edition, 1993. – Contributed to numerous anthologies here and abroad. Editor: Edited the first feminist magazine in the U.S.: 1968 Notes from the First Year: Women’s Liberation 1969 Notes from the Second Year: Women’s Liberation 1970 Consulting Editor: Notes from the Third Year: WL Organizer: 1961–3 Activist in early Civil Rights Movement, notably St. Louis c.o.r.e. (Congress on Racial Equality) 1967–70 Founder-member of Women’s Liberation Movement, notably New York Radical Women, Redstockings, and New York Radical Feminists. Visual Artist: 1978–80 As an artist for the Cultural Council Foundation’s c.e.t.a. Artists’ Project (the first government funded arts project since w.p.a.): – Taught art workshops at Arthur Kill State Prison For Men – Designed and executed solo-outdoor mural on the Lower East Side for City Arts Workshop – As artist-in-residence at Tompkins Square branch of the New York Public Library, developed visual history of the East Village in a historical mural project.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Gender Studies / Queer Theory
    1 Women and Gender Studies / Queer Theory Please choose at least 60 to 67 texts from across the fields presented. Students are expected to familiarize themselves with major works throughout this field, balancing their particular interests with the need to prepare themselves broadly in the topic. First Wave Feminism 1. Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Women (1792) 2. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, “Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions” (1848) 3. Harriet Taylor, “Enfranchisement of Women” (1851) 4. Sojourner Truth, “Ain’t I a Woman?” (1851) 5. John Stuart Mill, The Subjection of Women (1869) 6. Susan B. Anthony, Speech after Arrest for Illegal Voting (1872) 7. Anna Julia Cooper, A Voice From the South (1892) 8. Charlotte Perkins, Women and Economics (1898) 9. Emma Goldman, The Traffic in Women and Other Essays on Feminism (1917) 10. Nancy Cott, The Grounding of Modern Feminism (1987) 11. Virginia Woolf, A Room of One’s Own (1929) 12. Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex (1953) Second Wave Feminism 13. Betty Friedan, The Feminine Mystique (1963) 14. Kate Millet, Sexual Politics (1969) 15. Phyllis Chesler, Women and Madness (1970) 16. Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution (1970) 17. Germaine Greer, The Female Eunuch (1970) 18. Brownmiller, Susan, Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape (1975) 19. Adrienne Rich, Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution (1976) 20. Mary Daly, Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism (1978) 21. 22. Alice Echols, Daring to Be Bad: Radical Feminism in America 1967-75 (1989) Third Wave Feminism 23. Leslie Heywood and Jennifer Drake, eds., Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism (1997) 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Susan Faludi How Shulamith Firestone Shaped Feminism The
    AMERICAN CHRONICLES DEATH OF A REVOLUTIONARY Shulamith Firestone helped to create a new society. But she couldn’t live in it. by Susan Faludi APRIL 15, 2013 Print More Share Close Reddit Linked In Email StumbleUpon hen Shulamith Firestone’s body was found Wlate last August, in her studio apartment on the fifth floor of a tenement walkup on East Tenth Street, she had been dead for some days. She was sixty­seven, and she had battled schizophrenia for decades, surviving on public assistance. There was no food in the apartment, and one theory is that Firestone starved, though no autopsy was conducted, by preference of her Orthodox Jewish family. Such a solitary demise would have been unimaginable to anyone who knew Firestone in the late nineteen­sixties, when she was at the epicenter of the radical­feminist movement, Firestone, top left, in 1970, at the beach, surrounded by some of the same women who, a reading “The Second Sex”; center left, with month after her death, gathered in St. Mark’s Gloria Steinem, in 2000; and bottom right, Church In­the­Bowery, to pay their respects. in 1997. Best known for her writings, Firestone also launched the first major The memorial service verged on radical­ radical­feminist groups in the country, feminist revival. Women distributed flyers on which made headlines in the late nineteen­ consciousness­raising, and displayed copies of sixties and early seventies with confrontational protests and street theatre. texts published by the Redstockings, a New York group that Firestone co­founded. The WBAI radio host Fran Luck called for the Tenth Street studio to be named the Shulamith Firestone Memorial Apartment, and rented “in perpetuity” to “an older and meaningful feminist.” Kathie Sarachild, who had pioneered consciousness­raising and coined the slogan “Sisterhood Is Powerful,” in 1968, proposed convening a Shulamith Firestone Women’s Liberation Memorial Conference on What Is to Be Done.
    [Show full text]
  • GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought
    GOV 1029 Feminist Political Thought Tuesday, Thursday 12-1.15 Fall Semester 2018 Professor Katrina Forrester Office Hours: Tuesday, Thursday 2-3 Office: CGIS K437 E-mail: [email protected] Teaching Fellow: Leah Downey E-mail: [email protected] Course Description: What is feminism? What is patriarchy? What and who is a woman? How does gender relate to sexuality, and to class and race? Should housework be waged, should sex be for sale, and should feminists trust the state? This course is an introduction to feminist political thought since the mid-twentieth century. It introduces students to classic texts of late twentieth-century feminism, explores the key arguments that have preoccupied radical, socialist, liberal, Black, postcolonial and queer feminists, examines how these arguments have changed over time, and asks how debates about equality, work, and identity matter today. We will proceed chronologically, reading texts mostly written during feminism’s so-called ‘second wave’, by a range of influential thinkers including Simone de Beauvoir, Shulamith Firestone, bell hooks and Catharine MacKinnon. We will examine how feminists theorized patriarchy, capitalism, labor, property and the state; the relationship of claims of sex, gender, race, and class; the development of contemporary ideas about sexuality, identity, and gender; and how and whether these ideas change how fundamental problems in political theory are understood. 1 Course Requirements: Participation (25%) includes (a) active participation in discussion (15%); and (b) weekly responses: each week you will send 2-3 brief questions/ comments about the reading to your TF by 5pm the day before section (10%) Paper 1 (25%) 5-6 pages due October 18 4pm.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWARD a FEMINIST THEORY of the STATE Catharine A. Mackinnon
    TOWARD A FEMINIST THEORY OF THE STATE Catharine A. MacKinnon Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England K 644 M33 1989 ---- -- scoTT--- -- Copyright© 1989 Catharine A. MacKinnon All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America IO 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 First Harvard University Press paperback edition, 1991 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data MacKinnon, Catharine A. Toward a fe minist theory of the state I Catharine. A. MacKinnon. p. em. Bibliography: p. Includes index. ISBN o-674-89645-9 (alk. paper) (cloth) ISBN o-674-89646-7 (paper) I. Women-Legal status, laws, etc. 2. Women and socialism. I. Title. K644.M33 1989 346.0I I 34--dC20 [342.6134} 89-7540 CIP For Kent Harvey l I Contents Preface 1x I. Feminism and Marxism I I . The Problem of Marxism and Feminism 3 2. A Feminist Critique of Marx and Engels I 3 3· A Marxist Critique of Feminism 37 4· Attempts at Synthesis 6o II. Method 8 I - --t:i\Consciousness Raising �83 .r � Method and Politics - 106 -7. Sexuality 126 • III. The State I 55 -8. The Liberal State r 57 Rape: On Coercion and Consent I7 I Abortion: On Public and Private I 84 Pornography: On Morality and Politics I95 _I2. Sex Equality: Q .J:.diff�_re11c::e and Dominance 2I 5 !l ·- ····-' -� &3· · Toward Feminist Jurisprudence 237 ' Notes 25I Credits 32I Index 323 I I 'li Preface. Writing a book over an eighteen-year period becomes, eventually, much like coauthoring it with one's previous selves. The results in this case are at once a collaborative intellectual odyssey and a sustained theoretical argument.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Body and Sexual Politics in Margaret Atwood's Selected Novels Mirenayat, Sayyed Ali; Soofastaei, Elaheh
    www.ssoar.info Female body and sexual politics in Margaret Atwood's selected novels Mirenayat, Sayyed Ali; Soofastaei, Elaheh Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Mirenayat, S. A., & Soofastaei, E. (2015). Female body and sexual politics in Margaret Atwood's selected novels. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 55, 154-159. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ ILSHS.55.154 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences Online: 2015-07-01 ISSN: 2300-2697, Vol. 55, pp 154-159 doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.55.154 © 2015 SciPress Ltd., Switzerland Female Body and Sexual Politics in Margaret Atwood's Selected Novels Elaheh Soofastaei, Sayyed Ali Mirenayat Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication Universiti Putra Malaysia E-mail address: [email protected] [email protected] Keywords: Gender, Politics, Sexuality, Silence, Female Body, Victimization. ABSTRACT. Margaret Atwood is the most prominent Canadian writer. Her feminist ideology is clearly obvious in her novels. She overtly illustrates her feminism view in human rights equality and freedom of choice. Atwood's works are consisted of the fundamental freedom and human rights. In general, her fictions truly portray the women's rights that are equal to men's rights.
    [Show full text]
  • A Research Agenda for an Ecofeminist-Informed Ecological Economics
    sustainability Article Transcending the Learned Ignorance of Predatory Ontologies: A Research Agenda for an Ecofeminist-Informed Ecological Economics Sarah-Louise Ruder † and Sophia Rose Sanniti *,† School of Environment, Resources and Sustainability University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † All authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 6 January 2019; Accepted: 6 March 2019; Published: 11 March 2019 Abstract: As a necessarily political act, the theorizing, debating and enacting of ecological economies offer pathways to radical socio-economic transformations that emphasize the ecological and prioritize justice. In response to a research agenda call for ecological economics, we propose and employ an ecofeminist frame to demonstrate how the logics of extractivist capitalism, which justify gender biased and anti-ecological power structures inherent in the growth paradigm, also directly inform the theoretical basis of ecological economics and its subsequent post-growth proposals. We offer pathways to reconcile these epistemological limitations through a synthesis of ecofeminist ethics and distributive justice imperatives, proposing leading questions to further the field. Keywords: ecological economics; ecofeminism; gender; capitalist-patriarchy; intersectionality; post-growth; transformational change; systems thinking; complexity As white-settlers in the Region of Waterloo, we acknowledge that we live and work on the traditional territory of the Attawandaron (Neutral), Anishnawbe, and Haudenosaunee peoples. The University of Waterloo is also situated on the Haldimand Tract: land promised to the Six Nations that includes ten kilometres on each side of the Grand River. We make this statement to act against the erasure of ongoing colonial legacies across Turtle Island and to acknowledge that we contribute to and benefit from the expulsion, assimilation, and genocide of Indigenous Peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Trans-Feminism: Berlin's Transgender Individuals' Narratives As Contributions to Ethics of Vegetarian Eco- Feminism
    ETHICAL TRANS-FEMINISM: BERLIN’S TRANSGENDER INDIVIDUALS’ NARRATIVES AS CONTRIBUTIONS TO ETHICS OF VEGETARIAN ECO- FEMINISMS By Anja Koletnik Submitted to Central European University Department of Gender Studies In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Gender Studies Supervisor: Assistant Professor Eszter Timár CEU eTD Collection Second Reader: Professor Allaine Cerwonka Budapest, Hungary 2014 Abstract This thesis will explore multi-directional ethical and political implications of meat non- consumption and cisgender non-conformity. My argument will present how applying transgender as an analytical category to vegetarian eco-feminisms, can be contributive in expanding ethical and political solidarity within feminist projects, which apply gender identity politics to their conceptualizations and argumentations. I will outline the potential to transcend usages of gender identity politics upon a cisnormative canon of vegetarian eco-feminisms lead by Carol J. Adams’ The Sexual Politics of Meat (1990). Adams’s canon of vegetarian eco-feminisms appropriates diet as a central resource of their political projects, which contest speciesism and cis-sexism. Like Adams’ canon, my analysis will consider diet as always having political connotations and implications, both for individuals and their embodiments, within broader socio-political realms. Alongside diet, transgender as an analytical category will be employed within analysis, due to its potential of exposing how genders as social categories and constructs are re-formed. My analysis will be based on narrative interviews, which will explore the multi-directional ethical and political implications of meat non-consumption and cisgender non-conformity among members of Berlin’s transgender / cisgender non-conforming and meat non-consuming subcultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Catharine Mckinnon Award Speech
    Unequal Predation, Unequal Protection1 NOW Woman of Vision Award Acceptance Speech Minneapolis, 20 July 2019 © Catharine A. MacKinnon 2019 “Making law do something about women’s experience” – yes, Twiss, that’s it! Wonderful and amazing as this award is, and as much as the recognition that it confers is deeply appreciated, I know that all you activists for women will understand that the real honor for decades of work opposing sexual violation as gender inequality—the real affirmation of the vision—is when others see it the way you see it and stand up against it. As a result of that, we are, finally, in the middle of the first mass movement against sexual abuse in the history of the world. Global #MeToo sprung from the law of sexual harassment, quickly overtook it, and is shifting law, culture, and politics everywhere, bringing down a lot of powerful men who have been violating a lot of us for a long time. It’s only getting up steam. Framed as inequality, combining gender with every social inequality known to man through which it works—prominently race, immigration status, age, and 1 Some themes and locutions in this talk have previously appeared in op-eds published in the Guardian and the New York Times. Catharine A. MacKinnon, How Litigation Laid the Ground for Accountability After #MeToo, GUARDIAN, Dec. 23, 2017, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/dec/23/how-litigation-laid-the-ground- for-accountability-after-metoo; Catharine A. MacKinnon, #MeToo Has Done What the Law Could Not, N.Y. TIMES, Feb. 4, 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/04/opinion/metoo-law-legal-system.html.
    [Show full text]