DOCSLIB.ORG

Firm Valuation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Firm Valuation Firm valuation Which model gives me the most accurate share price, the Dividend Discount Model or the Free Cash Flow to Equity model? “What is a cynic? A man who know the price of everything and the value of nothing” – [Oscar Wilde, 1892] Master Thesis in Finance Author: Gustav Claesson Tutors: Johan Eklund Andreas Högberg Jönköping June 2011 Acknowledgements I would hereby like to acknowledge the following persons for their help and guidance along the way: My tutors Johan Eklund and Andreas Högberg who have encouraged me for a deeper understanding for the subject, while at the same time providing valuable feedback during this whole process. My opponents that have been giving me support and valuable critique during the seminars we have had. Finally, I would like to acknowledge a special thank to my family and friends for their support and patience. Jönköping, 2011-06-01 ___________________________ Gustav Claesson i Master Thesis in Finance Title Firm Valuation Authors Gustav Claesson Tutors Johan Eklund and Andreas Högberg Date 2011-06-01 Subject terms Stock valuation, future growth prospects, and valuation models Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the applicability of the Free Cash Flow to Equity Model and the Dividend Discount Model on ten large cap firms on the Stockholm Stock Exchange. Moreover the author intends to examine whether these valuation methods differs in regards of the companies’ operational segment, business cycle and turnover. The target prices will hereafter be benchmarked with actual closing prices and professional analysts to observe similarities and deviations. Method: The focus lies on Swedish companies listed on Nasdaq OMX Stockholm’s Large Cap list. The companies are valued by collecting financial information from 2006- 2010 in order to find out what the share price in the beginning of 2011 should be. The models that are used to value the share are the Dividend Discount Model, which basically discounts actual dividends in order to find the present value of the share, and the Free Cash Flow to Equity model, which is discounting the firms’ cash flow available to its stockholders, i.e. the potential dividends. Since both of the valuation models require assumptions on future growth to be made, a combination of calculations and goals presented by the companies has been made in order to assume growth rates. Findings: The findings reveal that out of the twenty valuations that were made half of the most accurate ones came from the Dividend Discount Model, and half came from the Free Cash Flow to Equity model. It was however the Dividend Discount Model that provided the most accurate share prices, in comparison to the actual share prices from January 2011. It is also concluded that the turnover of the firm being evaluated does not have an impact on the valuation process, whilst the industry in which the firm operates as well as its payout ratio are factors that need to be taken into consideration when choosing between the Dividend Discount Model and the Free Cash Flow to Equity model. ii Abbreviations and explanations Market Capitalization – The market value of a company’s equity, share price times the number of shares outstanding ROE – The Return on Equity FCFE – The Free Cash Flow to Equity DDM – The Dividend Discount Model DCF – Discounted Cash Flow SCB – Swedish Statistical Service P/E ratio – Price-to-earnings ratio Large Cap – Stockholm Stock Exchange’s list of companies with a market capitalization of over one billion euros Due Diligence – A process whereby an individual, or an organization, seeks sufficient information about a business entity to reach an informed judgement as to its value for a specific purpose Intrinsic Value – The fundamental value, or the present value of all future cash flows DPS – Dividends per Share EPS – Earnings per Share GDP – Gross domestic product GWP – Gross world product PV – Present Value CAPM – Capital Asset Pricing Model iii iv Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ......................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROBLEM DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................... 3 1.3 PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 DELIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................... 5 1.5 OUTLINE OF THE THESIS .................................................................................................. 5 2 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 6 2.1 METHOD APPROACHES .................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 Inductive vs. Deductive .................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Quantitative vs. Qualitative ............................................................................................. 7 2.2 THE CASE STUDY ............................................................................................................. 8 2.3 COLLECTION OF THE DATA ............................................................................................. 8 2.4 LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................... 8 3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................. 9 3.1 OUTLINE OF THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................ 9 3.2 MOTIVES FOR VALUATION ............................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Who Values Stocks? ................................................................................................... 10 3.3 RELATED CONCEPTS ...................................................................................................... 11 3.3.1 The Concept of Value .................................................................................................. 11 3.3.2 Due Diligence ............................................................................................................. 11 3.3.3 Capital Market Efficiency ............................................................................................. 12 3.3.4 Capital structure and firm value ...................................................................................... 13 3.4 FINANCIAL MODELS & VALUATION .............................................................................. 13 3.4.1 Dividend Discount Model .............................................................................................. 13 3.4.2 Free Cash Flow to Equity ............................................................................................. 17 3.4.3 Related concepts and formulas connected with DDM & FCFE ............................................ 19 3.5 THE COMPANIES ............................................................................................................ 22 3.6 PREVIOUS RESEARCH ..................................................................................................... 23 3.7 ASSUMPTIONS PRIOR TO EMPIRICAL FINDINGS & ANALYSIS ......................................... 23 4 EMPIRICAL FINDINGS & ANALYSIS ..................................................................... 25 4.1 FUTURE GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................... 25 4.2 ABB (INDUSTRIAL GOODS & SERVICES – LARGE CAP) ................................................... 25 4.2.1 Financials & Assumptions ........................................................................................... 26 4.2.2 The Gordon Growth Model ........................................................................................... 26 4.2.3 Constant Growth FCFE Model ..................................................................................... 26 4.2.4 Summary Analysis ...................................................................................................... 26 4.3 ASSA ABLOY (INDUSTRIAL GOODS & SERVICES – LARGE CAP) ..................................... 27 4.3.1 Financials & Assumptions ........................................................................................... 27 4.3.2 The Gordon Growth Model ........................................................................................... 28 4.3.3 Constant Growth FCFE Model ..................................................................................... 28 4.3.4 Summary Analysis ...................................................................................................... 28 4.4 ASTRAZENECA (HEALTH SERVICE – LARGE CAP) .......................................................... 29 4.4.1 Financials & Assumptions ........................................................................................... 29 4.4.2 Two-stage Dividend Discount Model ............................................................................... 30 4.4.3 Two-stage FCFE Model ............................................................................................... 30 4.4.4 Summary Analysis .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A ABB Group Advantage Global Trade Solutions AF Consult Ahlstrom
    A CFAO ABB Group China Systems Advantage Global Trade Solutions Chromafora AF Consult Citi Ahlstrom Munksjö ClimeOn Airbus Group Coface Aker Solutions Collector Bank Alfa Laval Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Alimak Group Bank Andritz ANZ D Aon Danieli Archer Daniels Midland Danske Bank AS Arjo Huntleigh DeLaval Arthur J. Gallagher Deutsche Bank Atlas Copco DNB Bank Atradius Doranova AXA Group E B Eitech Bank ABC EKF Barak Fund Management Ekman & Co. Barclays EKN BillerudKorsnäs Elekta BNP Paribas Elof Hansson BNY Mellon Envac Bolero International Epiroc BPL Global Ericsson Brim Essity Bunge ESSWELL International Bureau van Dijk Euler Hermes Business Sweden F C Finnvera Camfil Flir Canopius FLSmidth CellMark Fortex International Cellmark G Metso Corporation Geodis MG Systemes Getinge Group Microsoft Corporation GIEK Mitigram GKN Aerospace Mizuho Bank Global Trade Corporation GTR N Gunnebo Treasury NatWest NCC H Nederman Handelsbanken NEOT Holmen Nokia Howden Sweden Nordea HSBC Nordic Investment Bank Hydro Aluminium Normet Group Nynas I IBM O ICC OCP Group ING OP Financial Group Interspiro Outokumpu Investec Outotec J P JLT Paulig Group John Bean Technologies Corporation Ponsse Price & Pierce K Kalmar Industries R Konecranes Raiffeisen Bank International Kongsberg Gruppen RKH Specialty Korab International Rolling Optics L S LEAP Export Finance Saab Lego Group Sandvik Sasa M Scania Marsh SEB McLaren SEK Setra Y Siemens Yapi Merkezi Siemens Financial Services Yara International SKF YIT Skov SMT Group Z Société Générale Zurich Credit & Political Risk SSAB Standard Chartered Stora Enso Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Surecomp Svenska Handelsbanken Swedafrica Consulting Swedbank Swift T Taurus fondas TD Bank Group Tellux Africa The Channel Syndicate The Game Changer Global Initiative TradeIX V Väderstad Valmet Vattenfall Volvo Group W we.trade Wells Fargo Willis Towers Watson X XL Catlin .
    [Show full text]
  • Sweden - India Business Guide
    3 BUSINESS GUIDE SWEDEN - INDIA SWEDEN SWEDEN - INDIA BUSINESS GUIDE 2 SWEDEN - INDIA BUSINESS GUIDE Disclaimer: The Embassy of Sweden, Consulate General of Sweden, Business Sweden and Swedish Chamber of Commerce India have made every effort to provide a comprehensive directory of companies with substantial Swedish interest represented in India, and companies with substantial Indian interest represented in Sweden. However, the Embassy cannot guarantee that the list is exhaustive. All company information contained in this directory has been provided by the companies themselves. Copyright (c) May 2017, Embassy of Sweden 4 1 Table of Contents Foreword 5 Team Sweden 7 Country Facts - Economy Trade and Investments 17 Core Values 31 Platforms 43 Partners 59 Business Directory 63 Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Mumbai 2 3 Foreword Sweden Makes in India! Ties between Sweden and India continue to environment and smart cities, ICT and grow stronger. We see intensified relations digitalization, as well as healthcare and life in a range of areas of mutual benefit and sciences. Sweden believes in knowledge- an increasing exchange of high-level visits based societies, powered by innovation and in both directions. The Make in India Week sustainability, while investing in people. In in Mumbai in 2016 saw the creation of a this, India and Sweden are ideal partners in permanent platform for business leaders, building sustainable business for the future. the India Sweden Business Leaders’ Round Table. In this eighth edition of the Sweden – India Business Guide, we highlight the core values Swedish companies have been Making in and key competencies that Sweden offers India for many decades and today create 185 India in a strategic partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Dividend Valuation Models Prepared by Pamela Peterson Drake, Ph.D., CFA
    Dividend valuation models Prepared by Pamela Peterson Drake, Ph.D., CFA Contents 1. Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. The basic model .......................................................................................................................... 1 3. Non-constant growth in dividends ................................................................................................. 5 A. Two-stage dividend growth ...................................................................................................... 5 B. Three-stage dividend growth .................................................................................................... 5 C. The H-model ........................................................................................................................... 7 4. The uses of the dividend valuation models .................................................................................... 8 5. Stock valuation and market efficiency ......................................................................................... 10 6. Summary .................................................................................................................................. 10 7. Index ........................................................................................................................................ 11 8. Further readings .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Underwriters Value Initial Public Offerings?: an Empirical Analysis of the French IPO Market
    How Do Underwriters Value Initial Public Offerings?: An Empirical Analysis of the French IPO Market Peter Roosenboom* RSM Erasmus University JEL classification: G24, G32 Keywords: Initial public offerings, valuation * Corresponding author. The usual disclaimer applies. Correspondence address: Department of Financial Management, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: +31 10 408 1255, Fax: +31 10 408 9017, Email: [email protected]. I thank Martine Cools, Tjalling van der Goot, Frank Hartmann, Abe de Jong, Gerard Mertens, Peter Pope, Willem Schramade, Jeroen Suijs and Frank Verbeeten and several anonymous underwriters for their helpful suggestions. How Do Underwriters Value Initial Public Offerings?: An Empirical Analysis of the French IPO Market Abstract This paper investigates how French underwriters value the stocks of companies they bring public. Underwriters often use several valuation methods to determine their fair value estimate of the IPO firm’s equity. We investigate five of these valuation methods: peer group multiples valuation, the dividend discount model, the discounted cash flow model, the economic value added method, and underwriter-specific methods. We document that underwriters base their choice for a particular valuation method on firm characteristics, aggregate stock market returns and aggregate stock market volatility in the period before the IPO. In addition, we examine how underwriters combine the value estimates of the valuation methods they use into a fair value estimate by assigning weights to these value estimates. We document that these weights also depend on firm-specific factors, aggregate stock market returns and aggregate stock market volatility. Finally, we document that underwriters discount their fair value estimate to set the preliminary offer price of the shares.
    [Show full text]
  • 15.401 Finance Theory I, Equities
    15.401 15.40115.401 FinanceFinance TheoryTheory MIT Sloan MBA Program Andrew W. Lo Harris & Harris Group Professor, MIT Sloan School Lecture 7: Equities © 2007–2008 by Andrew W. Lo Critical Concepts 15.401 Industry Overview The Dividend Discount Model DDM with Multiple-Stage Growth EPS and P/E Growth Opportunities and Growth Stocks Reading Brealey, Myers and Allen, Chapter 4 © 2007–2008 by Andrew W. Lo Lecture 7: Equities Slide 2 Industry Overview 15.401 What Is Common Stock? Equity, an ownership position, in a corporation Payouts to common stock are dividends, in two forms: – Cash dividends – Stock dividends Unlike bonds, payouts are uncertain in both magnitude and timing Equity can be sold (private vs. public equity) Key Characteristics of Common Stock: Residual claimant to corporate assets (after bondholders) Limited liability Voting rights Access to public markets and ease of shortsales © 2007–2008 by Andrew W. Lo Lecture 7: Equities Slide 3 Industry Overview 15.401 The Primary Market (Underwriting) Venture capital: A company issues shares to special investment partnerships, investment institutions, and wealthy individuals Initial public offering (IPO): A company issues shares to the general public for the first time (i.e., going public) Secondary or seasoned equity offerings (SEO): A public company issues additional shares Stock issuance to the general public is usually organized by an investment bank who acts as an underwriter: it buys part or all of the issue and resells it to the public Secondary Market (Resale Market) Organized exchanges: NYSE, AMEX, NASDAQ, etc. Specialists, broker/dealers, and electronic market-making (ECNs) OTC: NASDAQ © 2007–2008 by Andrew W.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Note Packet 1 Intrinsic Valuation
    Aswath Damodaran 1 Valuation: Lecture Note Packet 1 Intrinsic Valuation Aswath Damodaran Updated: September 2016 The essence of intrinsic value 2 ¨ In intrinsic valuation, you value an asset based upon its fundamentals (or intrinsic characteristics). ¨ For cash flow generating assets, the intrinsic value will be a function of the magnitude of the expected cash flows on the asset over its lifetime and the uncertainty about receiving those cash flows. ¨ Discounted cash flow valuation is a tool for estimating intrinsic value, where the expected value of an asset is written as the present value of the expected cash flows on the asset, with either the cash flows or the discount rate adjusted to reflect the risk. Aswath Damodaran 2 The two faces of discounted cash flow valuation 3 ¨ The value of a risky asset can be estimated by discounting the expected cash flows on the asset over its life at a risk-adjusted discount rate: where the asset has an n-year life, E(CFt) is the expected cash flow in period t and r is a discount rate that reflects the risk of the cash flows. ¨ Alternatively, we can replace the expected cash flows with the guaranteed cash flows we would have accepted as an alternative (certainty equivalents) and discount these at the riskfree rate: where CE(CFt) is the certainty equivalent of E(CFt) and rf is the riskfree rate. Aswath Damodaran 3 Risk Adjusted Value: Two Basic Propositions 4 ¨ The value of an asset is the risk-adjusted present value of the cash flows: 1. The “IT” proposition: If IT does not affect the expected cash flows or the riskiness of the cash flows, IT cannot affect value.
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Management Companies Valuation
    THE VALUATION OF ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANIES Prof. Roberto Moro Visconti – Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano, Italy [email protected] Abstract Asset management firms are characterized by having quite high margins, although working in a highly competitive industry. However, the nature of their businesses makes it difficult to define both debt and reinvestment, making the estimation of cash flows much more difficult. It is reasonable to assume that Free Cash Flows to Equity-holders (FCFE) are proxied by net earnings because of a negligible level of investments, depreciation, and net working capital. For Asset Management firms, dividends are often the only tangible cash flow that we can observe or estimate. The common methods used to value asset management firms are the discounted cash flow, the multiples, and the Dividend Discount Model, with some adaptions. Despite their simplicity, rules of thumbs are often characterized by the inaccuracy of the final value. Keywords : Assets under Management, Discounted Cash Flows, Dividend Discount Model, 1 multiples, rules of thumb, fees. 1. Framework Asset Management companies can be independent investment companies or a part of a bank; they usually do not invest in their own account but on behalf of their clients. This is one distinguished difference between asset management companies with other financial institutions such as commercial banks, investment banks, or insurers (Elliott, 2014). MorningStar defines investment management firms as “firms offering diversified services such as asset administration, investment advice, portfolio or mutual fund management, money management, venture capital, and investment research”. According to the recent academic literature, the three methods commonly used for the valuation of the asset management firms are: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT 3 Introduction Q the Year in Brief the Year in Brief Q Introduction
    Passion for life 2020 Annual Report This is Getinge Q Introduction CONTENTS Introduction Passion for life This is Getinge 1 Global value creation 2 Sometime in life, we all need to seek health care. At The year in brief 4 Getinge, we have a long tradition of creating innovations CEO Interview 6 that improve people’s quality of life – and save lives. We Trends and business drivers 8 think it is the most important job in the world. Strategy Targets 12 Strategy for sustainable growth 14 Sustainability framework 18 Operations Market overview & sales 31 Acute Care Therapies 34 Life Science 38 Surgical Workflows 42 Annual Report Administration Report 47 Corporate Governance Report 56 Board of Directors 69 Getinge Executive Team 72 Guidelines for remuneration 74 Remuneration Report 79 Proposed appropriation of profit 82 Group Financial statements 83 Notes 88 Parent Company Financial statements 120 Notes 124 Auditor’s report 131 Other information Sustainability notes 136 GRI index 147 The Getinge share 150 Multi-year overview 152 Group companies 158 Definitions 162 Getinge adds value to THIS IS GETINGE customers’ operations in terms of The world is facing major challenges, one of which is the ability to provide 25,000 10,800 the increasing world population with safe and effective health care. We live longer and, according to WHO, lifestyle diseases such as cardiovascular Improved No. of customers No. of employees in the company diseases are one of the primary causes of death globally. clinical outcomes Getinge is committed to ensuring that all people and societies have access to the best possible health care.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reliability of Constant Growth Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
    onomic c s & f E o M Gacus and Hinlo, Int J Econ Manag Sci 2018, 7:1 l a a n n a r g u e DOI: 10.4172/2162-6359.1000487 o m J International Journal of Economics & e l n a t n S o i c t i a ISSN: 2162-6359 e n n r c e t e s n I Management Sciences Research Article Open Access Research Article Open Access The Reliability of Constant Growth Dividend Discount Model (DDM) in Valuation of Philippine Common Stocks Roy Bornilla Gacus1* and Jennifer E Hinlo2 1Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Southern Mindanao, USM Avenue, Brgy Poblacion, Kabacan, Cotabato 9407, Philippines 2Department of Economics, School of Applied Economics, University of Southeastern Philippines, Obrero, Davao City, Philippines Abstract The constant growth dividend discount model (DDM) is said to be the simplest and most popular valuation method to estimate the intrinsic value of the company’s stocks. This study is aimed to test the reliability of the constant growth DDM in valuation of the selected common stock listed companies in the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE). The accuracy of constant growth DDM to predict the value of common stocks was compared from the actual values using the symmetric median absolute percentage error (sMdAPE), and then tested whether the median difference between the predicted and actual values of the selected common stock listed companies were significant using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results of the study showed that majority of the companies had a sMdAPE less than 30%. This means that the error to predict the common stock values among the companies was less than 30%.
    [Show full text]
  • Dividend-Decisions.Pdf
    CHAPTER 9 DIVIDEND DECISIONS LEARNING OUTCOMES Understand the Meaning of Dividend Decision Understand the importance of Dividend Decision Discuss various Forms of Dividend Discuss various Determinants of Dividend Explain various theories of Dividend Decisions. Financing Decision Theories Financial Investment Decision Decision 1. M. M. Hypothesis 2. Walter Model Dividend Decision 3. Gordon Model 4. Traditional theory 5. Linter Model © The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India 9.2 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 9.1 INTRODUCTION Financial management is the process of making financial decisions. Financial decision broadly covers three areas: i. Financing decision ii. Investment decision iii. Dividend decision Dividend decision is one of the most important areas of management decisions. It is easy to understand but difficult to implement. Let’s understand this with the help of an example, suppose a company, say X limited, which is continuously paying the dividend at a normal growth rate, earns huge profits this year. Now the management has to decide whether continue to pay dividend at normal rate or to pay at an increasing rate? Why this dilemma? The reason is that, if the management decides to pay higher dividend, then it might be possible that next year, the company will not achieve such higher growth rate, resulting the next year’s dividend will be low as compared to last year’s. However, if the company decides to stay on the normal rate of dividend then surplus amount of retained earnings would remain idle which will result in over capitalization, if no opportunity existing to utilize the funds. Also there are more factors which will affect the dividend decision (will be discussed later).
    [Show full text]
  • Dividend Discount Models
    ch13_p323-350.qxp 12/5/11 2:14 PM Page 323 CHAPTER 13 Dividend Discount Models n the strictest sense, the only cash flow you receive from a firm when you buy I publicly traded stock in it is a dividend. The simplest model for valuing equity is the dividend discount model—the value of a stock is the present value of expected dividends on it. While many analysts have turned away from the dividend discount model and view it as outmoded, much of the intuition that drives discounted cash flow valuation stems from the dividend discount model. In fact, there are compa- nies where the dividend discount model remains a useful tool for estimating value. This chapter explores the general model as well as specific versions of it tailored for different assumptions about future growth. It also examines issues in using the dividend discount model and the results of studies that have looked at its efficacy. THE GENERAL MODEL When an investor buys stock, he or she generally expects to get two types of cash flows—dividends during the period the stock is held and an expected price at the end of the holding period. Since this expected price is itself determined by future dividends, the value of a stock is the present value of dividends through infinity: ∞ t= E(DPS ) Value per share of stock = ∑ t + t t=1 ()1 ke = where DPSt Expected dividends per share = ke Cost of equity The rationale for the model lies in the present value rule—the value of any asset is the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at a rate appropriate to the riskiness of the cash flows being discounted.
    [Show full text]
  • NORDIC INVESTMENT BANK DECEMBER 2008 Winds of Change
    NORDIC INVESTMENT BANK DECEMBER 2008 Winds of change Danish DONG Energy is building the world’s largest offshore wind turbine park Financing environmental action CLEERE and BASE lending facilities in operation BULLETIN DECEMBER 2008 4 Where the wind blows The world’s largest offshore wind turbine park CONTENTS NIB in in the making 7 Moventas: favourable winds good and Finnish wind turbine manufacturer expanding production 8 Latvenergo’s investments address climate change LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT LETTER FROM bad times 10 Baltic Sea needs political commitment THE PRESIDENT LETTER FROM Interview with Ambassador Ole Norrback 11 NIB’s environmental lending facilities in operation 12 Environmental investments in Ukraine authorities providing both liquidity and capital have served to prevent a collapse 14 Amber One of the financial system, but the financial Building Europe’s new north-south corridor sector is clearly not performing its KI Ä normal function of intermediating M U 16 Getinge grows for cost efficiency savings into investments. OIV This has shed new light on the role K 18 Gauging competitiveness calls for expertise of the IFIs. On the one hand, their good ARJO Interview with Martin Carlens, NIB’s Head of Mandate standing in the financial markets has, at : M least so far, provided stable access to the HOTO 20 Competitiveness in focus funding markets, which has enabled P them to fill some of the gaps that the Projects in Denmark, Estonia and Norway private sector has been unable or The role of and the need for Interna- adjust their resources to a lower level of unwilling to fill in the new situation.
    [Show full text]