MISSION Thomas H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MISSION Thomas H RETHINKING AFGHANISTAN: HANIST G A ECHOES OF ULSTER AND F N A THE IRA? MISSION Thomas H. Johnson and Richard English A F N G A The US and NATO sit precariously perched on the precipice of failure in Afghanistan. H A ST As suggested by Lieutenant-General David Richards, former commander of NATO NI forces in Afghanistan, “We need to realize we could actually fail here.” Such a failure could irreparably damage NATO’s credibility and create a regional crisis throughout central and south Asia. In this article, Thomas H. Johnson and Richard English suggest that the lessons drawn from British experience in Northern Ireland might be constructively applied to the situation in Afghanistan — offering a way for NATO to edge back from the brink of failure and regional catastrophe. Les États-Unis et l’OTAN se retrouvent aujourd’hui en équilibre instable tout juste au bord du gouffre afghan. « Nous devons envisager la possibilité d’un échec », prévient à juste titre l’ancien commandant des forces de l’OTAN en Afghanistan, le lieutenant- général David Richards. Un échec qui ferait un tort irréparable à la crédibilité de l’OTAN et provoquerait une crise dans toute l’Asie centrale et du Sud. Thomas H. Johnson et Richard English proposent ici d’appliquer à la situation afghane les leçons de l’expérience britannique en Irlande du Nord. Et d’offrir ainsi à l’OTAN un moyen d’éviter tout autant cet échec qu’une catastrophe régionale. ften maligned, Canada’s commitment in minute fire fight three Afghan political officials were shot Afghanistan as part of the NATO/ISAF alliance is a dead and 11 people wounded. The Taliban claimed responsi- O serious one, in one of the most dangerous parts of bility for the attack, which it attributed to a dedicated six- the country. Now Canadian forces in Kandahar find them- man cell, three of whose members were killed during the selves beset both in the field and at home. Political discus- attack. This event highlights the insurgents’ growing capabil- sions in Ottawa and tribal machinations in Kandahar have ity to attack the Afghan regime and its supporters anywhere created a situation in which the force finds itself hobbled by and at any time, as well as possible fissures in (or at least constraints dictated by Canadian domestic politics, unaided incompetence of) Karzai’s security detail. by other NATO/ISAF allies either facing their own difficul- ties or unwilling to help the Canadians, and under incessant hese disturbing events are compounded by the fact that attack by a resurgent Taliban and their allies. According to T the ongoing political and military crisis in Afghanistan the Afghanistan Conflict Monitor, Canadian soldiers, as of late has been partially eclipsed by contemporary problems in Iraq. 2007, were dying at a rate thrice that of their British coun- But it is arguably Afghanistan, rather than Iraq, that is the terparts and four times that of their American colleagues. more significant theatre for the War on Terror. The depth and Recent debates in Canada have pledged a presence in urgency of the Afghan crisis are evident from the escalation Afghanistan through 2011, and the US “mini-surge” of of insurgent violence, with 2007 being the most deadly year Marines in the south promises to ease some of Canada’s since the initiation of Operation Enduring Freedom. Last year woes, but the force in Kandahar still has a tough row to hoe, witnessed a significant increase in Taliban and insurgent as do forces in otherparts of the country. operations, making for a destabilization “surge.” On April 27, 2008, during ceremonies near the Things are obviously not well in Afghanistan and it Presidential Palace in Kabul commemorating the 16th seems unlikely that things will improve dramatically in 2008. anniversary of the fall of the Afghan communist government The insurgency has moved significantly beyond the south an assassination attempt was made against President Karzai. and east of the country and is now even closing in on Kabul While Karzai survived the attack, during the subsequent 30- as suggested by the events of April 27. The Senlis Council has 14 OPTIONS POLITIQUES JUIN 2008 Rethinking Afghanistan: echoes of Ulster and the IRA? recently written that “the Taliban has tings we find the profound intersection religious identifications, organizations, shown itself to be a truly resurgent of rival nationalisms with violence, as cultures and grievances. The national- force” with an “ability to establish a well as considerable tension between ism of Irish nationalists was heavily presence throughout the country.” nation and state; in each setting there Catholic in identity and composition, has been the deployment of a mixture while the British state and its unionist he current approach of the US and of terrorist and insurgent violence for adherents and their own associated T its NATO allies, including Canada, political ends; and there have also been national identities were in turn deeply in Afghanistan is simply not working, some more mechanical or organiza- influenced by Protestantism. and our strategy in this vital setting for tional similarities between the two Parallel to the conflict in Ireland is the struggle against terrorism urgently cases (involving the dynamics of rele- that of Afghanistan; proto-nationalist requires rethinking. This article is vant international support for vio- Taliban and other insurgent groups are seeking to overthrow the The Taliban, reliant on external funding, have managed to democratically elected maintain strong financial ties outside Afghanistan’s borders, Afghan government in and gun-running has been closely linked to financial support favour of a state run almost exclusively by leaders of the in the Afghan as in the Irish case. Again the Taliban have Ghilzai tribe of the Pashtun enjoyed the benefits of secure and reliable areas of ethnicity, along a very spe- geographic safe haven in Pakistan. cific (and bastardized) code of Deobandi Islam. Fiercely based on the assumption that such a lence; porous borders; safe havens; the xenophobic and long the rivals of rethinking requires both a deep con- local autonomy of violent operatives; other ethnicities in Afghanistan, the textual knowledge of the Afghan polit- and the business of intra-communal Taliban have also sought to construe ical and security situation, as well as an control on the part of violent agents). their opponents as un-Islamic for their ability to learn from the lessons of belief in other sects or schools of post-conflict and violence-plagued here exist sufficient similarities Islamic law. zones elsewhere. We draw on lessons T between the Irish and Afghan cases learned from recent Irish experiences for consideration of the former to illu- learly, both the IRA and the Taliban of terrorism and counter-terrorism and minate our reading of the latter. In both C also exemplified the way in which consider these in relation to how best settings we have witnessed the pro- ethno-religious nationalism could inter- we might proceed in the current and found and durable strength of ethno- sect with violent struggle, and both future situation within Afghanistan. religious identity. The Provisional IRA groups pointed also toward the political There are, of course, some signifi- emerged and fought as an explicitly importance of historic tensions between cant differences between the two set- nationalist movement, pursuing the nation and state, and the significance of tings considered here. The timeline is goal of national self-determination and fierce opposition toward foreign rule. In different, with the Northern Ireland attempting to further the communal Ireland, the IRA felt that the six-county conflict erupting in the late 1960s and interests of the Irish people as such. But state in the northeast was wrongly incor- the immediate Afghan crisis emerging it did so with backing from a very partic- porated into a hostile state (the United as a 21st-century phenomenon; the his- ular ethnic community within Kingdom) and that violence was legiti- torical contexts of the Afghan state and Northern Ireland — the nationalist mate as the only effective means of liber- the Northern Ireland state are different; community there — and this communi- ating that territory from British control. the religious cultures involved in the ty was overwhelmingly drawn from one The IRA sought the establishment of an combatant groups diverge in some key side of a starkly drawn religious divide independent and united Ireland: a state respects; and the respective scales of dis- between Catholics and Protestants. In comprising the whole of the Irish island order, crisis and military engagement terms of membership, the IRA was and one that was fully independent of have been different in the two places. almost exclusively Catholic; Irish British power. Similarly, the Taliban seek Equally, however, there are striking nationalism had, since the early 19th to establish an Islamic Emirate in echoes and similarities between the century, effectively been a Catholic phe- Afghanistan, of the type they almost had Northern Irish and Afghan cases and nomenon. The conflict during the 19th from 1996 to 2001. To their minds, all between, for example, the violent and 20th centuries, between Irish that prevents them is the presence of for- resistance characterizing the Irish nationalism and its unionist/British eign troops, even if the majority of Republican Army (IRA) and the opponents in Ireland, was a battle Afghans have no desire to return to Taliban. In each case, we find the between two rival national or ethnic Taliban rule either. extraordinary power of religiously groups. But these two national tradi- Both the IRA and the Taliban have infused ethnic identity; in both set- tions were profoundly influenced by practised violence that has straddled the POLICY OPTIONS 15 JUNE 2008 Thomas H.
Recommended publications
  • Rethinking Afghanistan
    Rethinking Afghanistan: International Lessons for the War on Terror * Thomas H. Johnson and Richard English THE AFGHAN CRISIS The ongoing political and military crisis in Afghanistan has been partially eclipsed by contemporary problems in Iraq. But it is arguably Afghanistan, rather than Iraq, that is the more significant theatre for the War on Terror. The depth and urgency of the Afghan crisis are evident from the escalation of insurgent violence, with 2007 being the most deadly year since the initiation of Operation Enduring Freedom. Last year witnessed a significant increase in Taliban and insurgent operations, making for a destabilization “surge.” It seems unlikely that things will improve dramatically in 2008. The insurgency has moved significantly beyond the south and east of the country and is *THOMAS H. JOHNSON is a Research Professor in the Department of National Security Affairs as well as Director of the Program for Culture and Conflict Studies at the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey. He has published widely on Afghanistan and frequents the country on a regular basis. His commentaries have appeared in the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Newsweek and on NPR. RICHARD ENGLISH is Professor of Politics at Queen’s University, Belfast. His books include Armed Struggle: The History of the IRA (2003) and Irish Freedom: The History of Nationalism in Ireland (2006). He has for many years commented on terrorism and political violence, including work with the BBC, NPR, Newsweek, the New York Times, the Times Literary Supplement and the Financial Times. 1 now even closing in on Kabul. The Senlis Council has recently written that “the Taliban has shown itself to be a truly resurgent force” with an “ability to establish a presence throughout the country.” The current approach of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • How the 1981 Hunger Strike Changed the Republican Movement in Ireland
    Providence College DigitalCommons@Providence History & Classics Undergraduate Theses History & Classics 12-15-2013 ‘The People’s Own MP’: How the 1981 Hunger Strike Changed the Republican Movement in Ireland Ryan Fink Providence College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_undergrad_theses Part of the European History Commons Fink, Ryan, "‘The People’s Own MP’: How the 1981 Hunger Strike Changed the Republican Movement in Ireland" (2013). History & Classics Undergraduate Theses. 21. https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_undergrad_theses/21 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History & Classics at DigitalCommons@Providence. It has been accepted for inclusion in History & Classics Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Providence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ‘The People’s Own MP’ How the 1981 Hunger Strike Changed the Republican Movement in Ireland By Ryan Fink HIS 490 History Honors Thesis Department of History Providence College Fall 2013 “Forever we'll remember him that man who died in pain That his country North and South might be united once again To mourn him is to organise and built a movement strong With ballot box and armalite, with music and with song He was a poet and a soldier, he died courageously And we gave him 30,000 votes while in captivity.” -Bruce Scott “The People’s Own MP” CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: THE IRISH REBEL TRADITION……………………… 1 CHAPTER ONE The Irish Rebellion and the Founding of Sinn Féin……………………. 3 CHAPTER TWO IRA Ideology: The Green Book………………………………………… 7 CHAPTER THREE Ideology of the Sinn Féin Party………………………………………… 15 CHAPTER FOUR Into the Eighties: The Prison Movement……………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • British Collusion in the Irish War on Terror: Analyzing the Legal and Ethical Implications of Deploying Collusion Tactics to Defeat Terrorism Gabriel Haughey
    University of Portland Pilot Scholars History Undergraduate Publications and History Presentations 12-2017 British Collusion in the Irish War on Terror: Analyzing the Legal and Ethical Implications of Deploying Collusion Tactics to Defeat Terrorism Gabriel Haughey Follow this and additional works at: https://pilotscholars.up.edu/hst_studpubs Part of the History Commons Citation: Pilot Scholars Version (Modified MLA Style) Haughey, Gabriel, "British Collusion in the Irish War on Terror: Analyzing the Legal and Ethical Implications of Deploying Collusion Tactics to Defeat Terrorism" (2017). History Undergraduate Publications and Presentations. 13. https://pilotscholars.up.edu/hst_studpubs/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at Pilot Scholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Undergraduate Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Pilot Scholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. British Collusion in the Irish War on Terror: Analyzing the Legal and Ethical Implications of Deploying Collusion Tactics to Defeat Terrorism By Gabriel Haughey Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in History University of Portland December 2017 Between the mid-1960s and 1998, the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA), a radical paramilitary group not affiliated with the government of the Republic of Ireland, sought to liberate Northern Ireland from British rule through force of arms and unify all of Ireland under one independent Irish nation. In response to the PIRA’s campaign of violence, British military intelligence adopted counter terrorism measures, which included the recruitment and handling of PIRA informants (collusion) in order to infiltrate the paramilitary group’s command network.
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimizing Northern Ireland's Prison Hunger
    Starving for Attention: Legitimizing Northern Ireland’s Prison Hunger Strike of 1981 through the Print Media Honors Research Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation “with honors research distinction in International Studies” in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University By Marissa Black The Ohio State University June 2012 Project Advisers: Anthony Mughan, Department of International Studies Jeffrey Lewis, Department of International Studies Black 1 Starving for Attention: Legitimizing Northern Ireland’s Prison Hunger Strike of 1981 through the Print Media Marissa Black1 The Ohio State University, USA This study examines the media’s role in the legitimization of the 1981 Maze Prison Hunger Strike in Northern Ireland by members of the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA2) and the Irish National Liberation Army (INLA). The strike was ultimately a protest by these groups of their status as common criminals and an effort to regain ‘special category’ prisoner status. If they were able to legitimize their actions in the eyes of their communities, then they could have been capable of placing enough political pressure on the British government to concede the hunger strikers’ demands. In modern times, the media has become a powerful tool for terrorist organizations to gain support and recognition for their cause. However, in the case of the 1981 hunger strike, the media worked against the legitimization of the strikers which prevented them from achieving their political objectives. This study is a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the strike’s coverage in the Belfast Telegraph and the Irish Independent, two influential Irish newspapers. It seeks to reconcile the coverage of the strike in the print media with its components of legitimacy to understand why the strike was unable to ultimately force concessions from the British.
    [Show full text]
  • Desynchronized Irish Republican Political Strategy: the Dichotomy of the Armalite
    Desynchronized Irish Republican Political Strategy: The Dichotomy of the Armalite and the Ballot Box BY EVAN MALGREM The Irish Republican movement has been historically riddled with discontinuity, ideological infighting, and a myriad of fragmenting splinter groups. These tensions are visible in the union of the Provisional Irish Republican Army and Sinn Féin, which adopted the “armalite and ballot box” strategy of pursuing their goals simultaneously through subversive militancy and constitutional politics during the 1980s. This strategy is often seen as having reflected a surge in the popularity of radical politics in Northern Ireland, or else the radicalization of mainstream nationalist contingencies. Along with this, the PIRA and Sinn Féin are generally understood to have existed as inseparable organizational bodies with coordinated goals and interests. In many ways, though, these strategies were less harmoniously aligned than many had believed, and helped lead to the moderation of Republican politics and ultimately the demilitarization of the Republican movement. Thus, hindsight demonstrates that the Republicanisms of Sinn Féin and the PIRA were ultimately irreconcilable; the armalite and the ballot box were not complimentary sources of power or legitimacy, and the strength of one came at the expense of the other.1 The armalite and the ballot box, or the PIRA and Sinn Féin, are probably better understood as icons of competing ideologies rather than constituting a united front. If “the armalite” and “the ballot box” are understood to be a dichotomy rather than constituents of a holistic approach, then the coherency of republicanism itself falls into question. 1 Frampton discusses the difficulties that Sinn Féin faced in reconciling their non-abstentionist politics with their image as a legitimately Republican organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgetown Security Studies Review
    Georgetown Security tudies S Review What the New Administration Needs to Know About Terrorism and Counterterrorism February 2017 Proceedings from the January 26-27, 2017 conference WHAT THE NEW ADMINISTRATION NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT TERRORISM & COUNTERTERRORISM Hosted by: The Center for Security Studies (CSS) at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service and The Handa Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence (CSTPV) at University of St Andrews, Scotland Sponsored by the George T. Kalaris Fund for the Study of Intelligence and Published by the Georgetown Security Studies Review Featured Authors: Elizabeth Grimm Arsenault Jytte Klausen Mark Currie Diego Muro Paula Doyle Paul R. Pillar Richard English Fernando Reinares Daveed Gartenstein-Ross Sir David Veness Hanin Ghaddar Michael Vickers Bruce Hoffman Tim Wilson Edited by: Robert Morgan Byrne-Diakun, GSSR Editor-in-Chief Videos of the Conference: To view the complete proceedings of the conference, including remarks by all participants and Q&A sessions after each panel, please visit the following link to the Georgetown University Center for Security Studies YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/GUSecurityStudies Access the Georgetown Security Studies Review online at http://gssr.georgetown.edu Connect on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/GeorgetownUniversityGSSR Follow the Georgetown Security Studies Review on Twitter at ‘@gssreview’ Contact the Editor-in-Chief at [email protected] DISCLAIMER The views expressed in Georgetown Security Studies Review do not necessarily represent those of the editors or staff of GSSR, the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, or Georgetown University. The editorial board of GSSR and its affiliated peer reviewers strive to verify the accuracy of all factual information contained in GSSR.
    [Show full text]