MISSION Thomas H
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rethinking Afghanistan
Rethinking Afghanistan: International Lessons for the War on Terror * Thomas H. Johnson and Richard English THE AFGHAN CRISIS The ongoing political and military crisis in Afghanistan has been partially eclipsed by contemporary problems in Iraq. But it is arguably Afghanistan, rather than Iraq, that is the more significant theatre for the War on Terror. The depth and urgency of the Afghan crisis are evident from the escalation of insurgent violence, with 2007 being the most deadly year since the initiation of Operation Enduring Freedom. Last year witnessed a significant increase in Taliban and insurgent operations, making for a destabilization “surge.” It seems unlikely that things will improve dramatically in 2008. The insurgency has moved significantly beyond the south and east of the country and is *THOMAS H. JOHNSON is a Research Professor in the Department of National Security Affairs as well as Director of the Program for Culture and Conflict Studies at the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey. He has published widely on Afghanistan and frequents the country on a regular basis. His commentaries have appeared in the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Newsweek and on NPR. RICHARD ENGLISH is Professor of Politics at Queen’s University, Belfast. His books include Armed Struggle: The History of the IRA (2003) and Irish Freedom: The History of Nationalism in Ireland (2006). He has for many years commented on terrorism and political violence, including work with the BBC, NPR, Newsweek, the New York Times, the Times Literary Supplement and the Financial Times. 1 now even closing in on Kabul. The Senlis Council has recently written that “the Taliban has shown itself to be a truly resurgent force” with an “ability to establish a presence throughout the country.” The current approach of the U.S. -
How the 1981 Hunger Strike Changed the Republican Movement in Ireland
Providence College DigitalCommons@Providence History & Classics Undergraduate Theses History & Classics 12-15-2013 ‘The People’s Own MP’: How the 1981 Hunger Strike Changed the Republican Movement in Ireland Ryan Fink Providence College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_undergrad_theses Part of the European History Commons Fink, Ryan, "‘The People’s Own MP’: How the 1981 Hunger Strike Changed the Republican Movement in Ireland" (2013). History & Classics Undergraduate Theses. 21. https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_undergrad_theses/21 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History & Classics at DigitalCommons@Providence. It has been accepted for inclusion in History & Classics Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Providence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ‘The People’s Own MP’ How the 1981 Hunger Strike Changed the Republican Movement in Ireland By Ryan Fink HIS 490 History Honors Thesis Department of History Providence College Fall 2013 “Forever we'll remember him that man who died in pain That his country North and South might be united once again To mourn him is to organise and built a movement strong With ballot box and armalite, with music and with song He was a poet and a soldier, he died courageously And we gave him 30,000 votes while in captivity.” -Bruce Scott “The People’s Own MP” CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: THE IRISH REBEL TRADITION……………………… 1 CHAPTER ONE The Irish Rebellion and the Founding of Sinn Féin……………………. 3 CHAPTER TWO IRA Ideology: The Green Book………………………………………… 7 CHAPTER THREE Ideology of the Sinn Féin Party………………………………………… 15 CHAPTER FOUR Into the Eighties: The Prison Movement………………………………. -
British Collusion in the Irish War on Terror: Analyzing the Legal and Ethical Implications of Deploying Collusion Tactics to Defeat Terrorism Gabriel Haughey
University of Portland Pilot Scholars History Undergraduate Publications and History Presentations 12-2017 British Collusion in the Irish War on Terror: Analyzing the Legal and Ethical Implications of Deploying Collusion Tactics to Defeat Terrorism Gabriel Haughey Follow this and additional works at: https://pilotscholars.up.edu/hst_studpubs Part of the History Commons Citation: Pilot Scholars Version (Modified MLA Style) Haughey, Gabriel, "British Collusion in the Irish War on Terror: Analyzing the Legal and Ethical Implications of Deploying Collusion Tactics to Defeat Terrorism" (2017). History Undergraduate Publications and Presentations. 13. https://pilotscholars.up.edu/hst_studpubs/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at Pilot Scholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Undergraduate Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Pilot Scholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. British Collusion in the Irish War on Terror: Analyzing the Legal and Ethical Implications of Deploying Collusion Tactics to Defeat Terrorism By Gabriel Haughey Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in History University of Portland December 2017 Between the mid-1960s and 1998, the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA), a radical paramilitary group not affiliated with the government of the Republic of Ireland, sought to liberate Northern Ireland from British rule through force of arms and unify all of Ireland under one independent Irish nation. In response to the PIRA’s campaign of violence, British military intelligence adopted counter terrorism measures, which included the recruitment and handling of PIRA informants (collusion) in order to infiltrate the paramilitary group’s command network. -
Legitimizing Northern Ireland's Prison Hunger
Starving for Attention: Legitimizing Northern Ireland’s Prison Hunger Strike of 1981 through the Print Media Honors Research Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation “with honors research distinction in International Studies” in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University By Marissa Black The Ohio State University June 2012 Project Advisers: Anthony Mughan, Department of International Studies Jeffrey Lewis, Department of International Studies Black 1 Starving for Attention: Legitimizing Northern Ireland’s Prison Hunger Strike of 1981 through the Print Media Marissa Black1 The Ohio State University, USA This study examines the media’s role in the legitimization of the 1981 Maze Prison Hunger Strike in Northern Ireland by members of the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA2) and the Irish National Liberation Army (INLA). The strike was ultimately a protest by these groups of their status as common criminals and an effort to regain ‘special category’ prisoner status. If they were able to legitimize their actions in the eyes of their communities, then they could have been capable of placing enough political pressure on the British government to concede the hunger strikers’ demands. In modern times, the media has become a powerful tool for terrorist organizations to gain support and recognition for their cause. However, in the case of the 1981 hunger strike, the media worked against the legitimization of the strikers which prevented them from achieving their political objectives. This study is a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the strike’s coverage in the Belfast Telegraph and the Irish Independent, two influential Irish newspapers. It seeks to reconcile the coverage of the strike in the print media with its components of legitimacy to understand why the strike was unable to ultimately force concessions from the British. -
Desynchronized Irish Republican Political Strategy: the Dichotomy of the Armalite
Desynchronized Irish Republican Political Strategy: The Dichotomy of the Armalite and the Ballot Box BY EVAN MALGREM The Irish Republican movement has been historically riddled with discontinuity, ideological infighting, and a myriad of fragmenting splinter groups. These tensions are visible in the union of the Provisional Irish Republican Army and Sinn Féin, which adopted the “armalite and ballot box” strategy of pursuing their goals simultaneously through subversive militancy and constitutional politics during the 1980s. This strategy is often seen as having reflected a surge in the popularity of radical politics in Northern Ireland, or else the radicalization of mainstream nationalist contingencies. Along with this, the PIRA and Sinn Féin are generally understood to have existed as inseparable organizational bodies with coordinated goals and interests. In many ways, though, these strategies were less harmoniously aligned than many had believed, and helped lead to the moderation of Republican politics and ultimately the demilitarization of the Republican movement. Thus, hindsight demonstrates that the Republicanisms of Sinn Féin and the PIRA were ultimately irreconcilable; the armalite and the ballot box were not complimentary sources of power or legitimacy, and the strength of one came at the expense of the other.1 The armalite and the ballot box, or the PIRA and Sinn Féin, are probably better understood as icons of competing ideologies rather than constituting a united front. If “the armalite” and “the ballot box” are understood to be a dichotomy rather than constituents of a holistic approach, then the coherency of republicanism itself falls into question. 1 Frampton discusses the difficulties that Sinn Féin faced in reconciling their non-abstentionist politics with their image as a legitimately Republican organization. -
Georgetown Security Studies Review
Georgetown Security tudies S Review What the New Administration Needs to Know About Terrorism and Counterterrorism February 2017 Proceedings from the January 26-27, 2017 conference WHAT THE NEW ADMINISTRATION NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT TERRORISM & COUNTERTERRORISM Hosted by: The Center for Security Studies (CSS) at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service and The Handa Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence (CSTPV) at University of St Andrews, Scotland Sponsored by the George T. Kalaris Fund for the Study of Intelligence and Published by the Georgetown Security Studies Review Featured Authors: Elizabeth Grimm Arsenault Jytte Klausen Mark Currie Diego Muro Paula Doyle Paul R. Pillar Richard English Fernando Reinares Daveed Gartenstein-Ross Sir David Veness Hanin Ghaddar Michael Vickers Bruce Hoffman Tim Wilson Edited by: Robert Morgan Byrne-Diakun, GSSR Editor-in-Chief Videos of the Conference: To view the complete proceedings of the conference, including remarks by all participants and Q&A sessions after each panel, please visit the following link to the Georgetown University Center for Security Studies YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/GUSecurityStudies Access the Georgetown Security Studies Review online at http://gssr.georgetown.edu Connect on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/GeorgetownUniversityGSSR Follow the Georgetown Security Studies Review on Twitter at ‘@gssreview’ Contact the Editor-in-Chief at [email protected] DISCLAIMER The views expressed in Georgetown Security Studies Review do not necessarily represent those of the editors or staff of GSSR, the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, or Georgetown University. The editorial board of GSSR and its affiliated peer reviewers strive to verify the accuracy of all factual information contained in GSSR.