DOCSLIB.ORG

An Analysis of Changing Policy Attention of the European Commission from 1995 - 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Analysis of Changing Policy Attention of the European Commission from 1995 - 2012 The Commission’s Agenda: an analysis of changing policy attention of the European Commission from 1995 - 2012 N.W.M. Derks Master Thesis European Studies UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE EXAMINATION COMMITTEE Kostas Gemenis Minna van Gerven-Haanpää 21/08/2012 Abstract This thesis is concerned with the changes in the agenda of the European Commission. Using a newly created coding scheme, inspired by the Policy Agendas Project combined with lists of Commission portfolios and Directorates-General, natural sentences of all work programmes from 1995until 2012 are coded. This data is used to track changes in policy attention during the period from 1995-2012. A detailed description is given of the changes found in four specific policy areas: institutional operations; justice and home affairs; economic and financial policy; and social policy. For several of these policy areas, statistically significant correlations are found between changes in the level of attention for those policy areas and shifting political ideology of the Commission and the largest party in the European Parliament. Furthermore, although hard evidence for causal relationships between certain events, such as an economic crisis, and changing policy attention cannot be found due to the used methodology, a first step towards finding which events play a role in the causal processes that cause changes in the agenda can still be made. To my family: for their endless support of, and patience with, me in my long journey through my studies. To Jennifer: your presence and your faith in me made it possible for me to continue with my work even when I felt I would never reach this point. Thank you! I've had a little bit too much to think tonight But it's cool, I’ll be alright, just make sure that I keep travellin’ ~Atmosphere – In My Continental Acknowledgements I would like to thank all the people that helped me in the process of writing and finalizing this thesis. First of all, my thanks go out to Kostas Gemenis and Minna van Gerven, who gave me the opportunity to write this thesis as a continuation of my bachelor thesis and who have helped me in designing the research and writing this final version of my thesis in more ways than can be described here. Most of all, I would like to thank you for awakening my interest in academic research. Secondly, I would like to thank Jeroen Doetjes, who made it possible to combine the final years of my studies with the work necessary to earn enough money to keep myself afloat. And last, but most definitely not least, I would like to thank Jennifer, without whom I probably would not have made it through this entire process. Thank you for your patience, your encouragement, and your help in the creation and finalisation of this thesis. Table of contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................. 2 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Theoretical background and framework ................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Agenda setting within the institutional framework of the European Union ...................................... 5 2.1.1 Party politics in the European Commission? ............................................................................ 8 2.1.2 Policy priorities and position of political parties ...................................................................... 9 2.1.3 Political events influencing the Commission’s agenda ............................................................ 9 2.2 Social policy in, and of, the European Union .................................................................................. 10 2.2.1 Actors in the field of EU social policy: Commission, Council, Parliament ........................... 12 2.3 Research question and hypotheses .................................................................................................. 13 3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Document selection ......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Coding scheme ................................................................................................................................ 17 3.2.1 Intercoder reliability ............................................................................................................... 18 3.2.2 Determining policy priorities and political positioning of actors ........................................... 19 3.3 Analysis of the findings ................................................................................................................... 22 4 Findings ............................................................................................................................................... 23 4.1 Political positioning of the Commission and the European Parliament .......................................... 23 4.1.1 Left-right positioning of the European Commission .............................................................. 23 4.1.2 Left-right positioning of the largest party in the European Parliament .................................. 24 4.1.3 Policy priorities of the largest party in the European Parliament ........................................... 25 4.2 Analysing the work programmes .................................................................................................... 25 4.2.1 General observations .............................................................................................................. 26 4.2.2 Attention for institutional operations ...................................................................................... 29 4.2.3 Justice and home affairs ......................................................................................................... 31 4.2.4 Economic and financial affairs ............................................................................................... 35 4.2.5 Attention for social policy ...................................................................................................... 39 5 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 43 5.2 Limitations ...................................................................................................................................... 48 Bibliography .................................................................................................................................................. 51 Annex A: Special legislative procedures .......................................................................................................... I Annex B: European Parliament compositions (incoming parliaments) ......................................................... III Annex C: Coding scheme ................................................................................................................................ V Annex D: Attention for policy areas (in % of total number of sentences) .................................................... XII Annex E: Political positioning of the European Commission and its members ........................................... XIII 1 List of Figures Figure 2-1: Article 153(1) TFEU ................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 4-1: Top five policy areas in % of total work programme, 1995 - 2012 ............................................. 28 Figure 4-2: Attention for institutional operations, 1994 – 2012 (in % of total number of sentences) ............ 29 Figure 4-3: Attention for justice and home affairs, 1994 – 2012 (in % of total number of sentences) .......... 32 Figure 4-4: Terror* mentioned in work programmes 1995 - 2012 (in % of total number of words) ............. 33 Figure 4-5: Attention for economic and financial affairs, 1994 – 2012 (in % of total number of sentences) 36 Figure 4-6: Attention for social policy, 1994 – 2012 (in % of total number of sentences) ............................ 39 List of Tables Table 3-1: Policy categories in the coding scheme ........................................................................................ 17 Table 3-2: Krippendorff's alpha for the first draft coding scheme ................................................................. 18 Table 3-3: Krippendorff's alpha for final coding scheme............................................................................... 19 Table 4-1: Commission position (left-right) .................................................................................................. 23 Table 4-2: Left-right position of the largest party in the European Parliament.............................................. 24 Table 4-3: Policy priorities of the largest party in the EP .............................................................................. 25 Table 4-4: Correlations for institutional operations ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Luxembourgish EU Presidency and Financial Services – July-December 2015
    The Luxembourgish EU Presidency and Financial Services – July-December 2015 The Luxembourgish EU Presidency and Financial Services 1 July – 31 December 2015 Kreab Brussels 2 avenue de Tervueren, 1040 Brussels, Belgium www.kreab.com/brussels – @KreabEU 1 The Luxembourgish EU Presidency and Financial Services – July-December 2015 Contents Political Context of the Luxembourgish Presidency 3 Priorities of the Luxembourgish Presidency 4 Key Financial Services Initiatives and Legislative Dossiers 5 Organisation of the Luxembourgish Presidency 12 Annex I – Contact Information 13 Permanent Representation of Luxembourg to the European Union 13 Economy and Finance 14 Government of Luxembourg 16 Ministry of Finance of Luxembourg 17 Bank of Luxembourg 18 Financial Regulatory Body of Luxembourg 20 Annex II – CVs of Key Luxembourgish Ministers 21 Annex III – Provisional Calendar 23 Annex IV – Key Council Meetings 25 Annex V – Country Fact Sheet 26 Annex VI – The EU Presidency 28 2 The Luxembourgish EU Presidency and Financial Services – July-December 2015 Political Context of the Luxembourgish Presidency The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg will assume its twelfth Presidency of the Council of the European Union on 1 July 2015. Luxembourg is one of the smallest countries in the EU, but it is also the wealthiest per capita. Following Italy and Latvia, Luxembourg is the third in this Presidency Trio, and will be the second full Presidency to work with the new Commission headed by compatriot and former Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker. Luxembourg is the seat of several major institutions such as the European Court of Justice, the European Investment Bank, and the Court of Auditors. Attitude toward the EU Luxembourg is one of the six founding members of the European Union and has historically played a key role in its formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Wk &Rxqflo Phhwlqj 75$163257 /X[Hperxuj -Xqh
    &RQVHLO Luxembourg, 26 June 2000 9547/00 (Presse 224) WK&RXQFLOPHHWLQJ 75$163257 /X[HPERXUJ-XQH President :0U-RUJH&2(/+2 Minister for Social Infrastructure of the Portuguese Republic &217(176 3$57,&,3$176,,, ,7(06'(%$7(' SHIPPING ........................................................................................................................................ IV DIRECTIVE ON SHIP INSPECTION ORGANISATIONS ....................................................... IV DIRECTIVE ON PORT STATE CONTROL OF SHIPPING .................................................... IV REGULATION ON DOUBLE-HULL OIL TANKERS ............................................................... IV MARITIME SAFETY - CONCLUSIONS................................................................................... V GALILEO .......................................................................................................................................... VI AIR TRANSPORT ........................................................................................................................... VII PASSENGER RIGHTS .......................................................................................................... VII SINGLE EUROPEAN SKY.................................................................................................... VIII SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AND ATTESTATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE FOR CABIN CREWS IN CIVIL AVIATION ................................................. VIII ESTABLISHMENT OF A EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY (EASA).............
    [Show full text]
  • Merkel's Move to Reunify Cyprus Gets a Turkish Boot
    O C V ΓΡΑΦΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ Bringing the news ΤΟΥ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ to generations of ΑΠΟ ΤΟ 1915 The National Herald Greek Americans c v A wEEKly GREEK AmERICAN PuBlICATION www.thenationalherald.com VOL. 14, iSSUE 692 January 15-21 , 2011 $1.50 Daopoulos Merkel’s Move to Reunify Cyprus Gets a Turkish Boot Replays Erdogan Slaps His NFL Her Down With Odyssey Hard Reprimand NICOSIA - Citing her own coun - By Constantine S. Sirigos try’s post-World War II experi - TNH Staff Writer ences as a model, German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s sug - NEW YORK – Jim Daopoulos gestions on how to re-unify the has seen the battles up close and divided island of Cyprus were inside the command centers. He almost immediately rebuffed by has witnessed the blood and the Turkish Prime Minister Recep guts and has scars of his own to Tayyip Erdogan, who has had a prove it. He has observed the history of clashes with her be - flower of America’s athletic cause Merkel does not want his youth clash with opponents and country admitted into the Euro - give everything they’ve got, and pean Union. Merkel, after a visit has gone toe-to-toe with their to Nicosia, the divided capital commanders when they were on the island, said Turkey was upset they hadn’t won the game doing too little to help resolve or gotten the best out of their the crisis that has been ongoing people, spewing words a family since that country invaded newspaper cannot print. Cyprus in 1974, and which still Daopoulos has devoted four keeps a standing army there.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-Activity-Report.Pdf
    — 2020 — WILFRIED MARTENS CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN STUDIES ACTIVITY REPORT © February 2021 - Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies 2020’s label will unfortunately be, above all, the year of Table of Contents the COVID-19 pandemic. It has marked the fates of many people, the way of life we used to enjoy, the way in which we communicated and worked, and in fact the entire world. On one hand, it has caused unprecedent fear for Welcome 04 human lives, but on the other hand it stimulated signifi- cant ones, such as the great effort to effectively coordi- nate the fight against the virus and the decision to create the Recovery Fund – Next Generation EU. However, we Publications 07 ended the year with the faith that the vaccines humanity European View 08 developed will save human lives and gradually get the Publications in 2020 10 situation under control, also eliminating the pandemic’s devastating impact on the economy. Another sad moment of 2020 for the EU was, of course, the UK’s official exit. It was a very painful process, but Events 13 largely chaotic on the British side. Even though we Events in 2020 14 parted “in an orderly fashion”, the consequences will be Economic Ideas Forum Brussels 2020 16 felt on both sides for years to come. 10th Transatlantic Think Tank Conference 20 Another unquestionably significant event of 2020 was the US presidential election. The pandemic, along with the events surrounding the US election, such as the Common Projects 23 attack on the Capitol, proved how fragile democracy NET@WORK 24 is, as are we.
    [Show full text]
  • José Manuel Barroso's Leadership of the European Commission
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Kassim, Hussein Working Paper A new model presidency: José Manuel Barroso's leadership of the European Commission WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP IV 2013-502 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Kassim, Hussein (2013) : A new model presidency: José Manuel Barroso's leadership of the European Commission, WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP IV 2013-502, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/103427 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence
    [Show full text]
  • THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: an Early Assessment
    THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: An Early Assessment John Peterson University of Edinburgh Paper prepared for the 14th Biennial Conference of the EU Studies Association, Boston, 5-7th February 2015 DRAFT: Not for citation without permission Comments welcome [email protected] Abstract This paper offers an early evaluation of the European Commission under the Presidency of Jean-Claude Juncker, following his contested appointment as the so-called Spitzencandidat of the centre-right after the 2014 European Parliament (EP) election. It confronts questions including: What will effect will the manner of Juncker’s appointment have on the perceived legitimacy of the Commission? Will Juncker claim that the strength his mandate gives him license to run a highly Presidential, centralised Commission along the lines of his predecessor, José Manuel Barroso? Will Juncker continue to seek a modest and supportive role for the Commission (as Barroso did), or will his Commission embrace more ambitious new projects or seek to re-energise old ones? What effect will British opposition to Juncker’s appointment have on the United Kingdom’s efforts to renegotiate its status in the EU? The paper draws on a round of interviews with senior Commission officials conducted in early 2015 to try to identify patterns of both continuity and change in the Commission. Its central aim is to assess the meaning of answers to the questions posed above both for the Commission and EU as a whole in the remainder of the decade. What follows is the proverbial ‘thought piece’: an analysis that seeks to provoke debate and pose the right questions about its subject, as opposed to one that offers many answers.
    [Show full text]
  • Anna Diamantopoulou
    ANNA DIAMANTOPOULOU Greece’s candidate for the position of Secretary-General of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development CURRICULUM VITAE AnnA DiAmAntOpOulOu is a Greek politician and public figure who has led a distinguished career in public service in Greece and in Europe. ms. Diamantopoulou was a European Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, and has held several significant portfolios as a minister in the Greek government as well. She was minister of Development, Competitiveness and Shipping, and, prior to that, minister of Education, Research and technology, and lifelong learning. Her policy expertise and practice encompass a wide spectrum of areas: trade and industrial strategy, social insurance and social security systems, competitiveness and development, gender equality, education, and research-innovation and technology. more specifically, Anna Diamantopoulou has led work on the challenges and opportunities brought about by the Fourth industrial Revolution (it & Ai) at national and global levels. She also has considerable experience in the private and non-profit sectors. Z She is currently the President of DIKTIO – Network for Reform in Greece and Europe , a leading independent, non-partisan, Athens-based think tank, which she founded in 20 13. DiKtiO undertakes cutting-edge policy research, develops practical policy recommendations, and hosts high- level conferences, roundtables and lectures. DiKtiO’s research focuses on economic, social, and industrial policy reforms, while also producing important work on the impact of the Fourth industrial Revolution. As president and Founder of DiKtiO, Anna Diamantopoulou has overseen the organisation of more than 85 high-profile events as well as the publication of over a hundred policy and research papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Crols, Dirk (2006) from Tsarist Empire to League of Nations and from USSR to EU: Two Eras in the Construction of Baltic State Sovereignty
    Crols, Dirk (2006) From Tsarist empire to League of Nations and from USSR to EU: two eras in the construction of Baltic state sovereignty. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2453/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] FROM TSARIST EMPIRE TO LEAGUE OF NATIONS AND FROM USSR TO EU: TWO ERAS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF BALTIC STATE SOVEREIGNTY Thesis submitted by Dirk Crols to obtain the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). Date of submission: 23 July 2006 Department of Central and East European Studies, University of Glasgow Supervisor: Dr. David Smith, Senior Lecturer, Department of Central and East European Studies, University of Glasgow. 1 ABSTRACT This thesis examines how the three Baltic countries constructed their internal and external sovereign statehood in the interwar period and the post Cold War era. Twice in one century, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were namely confronted with strongly divided multiethnic societies, requiring a bold and wide-ranging ethnic policy. In 1918 all three Baltic countries promised their minorities cultural autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilfried Martens
    Wilfried Martens „WITHOUT THE CDU THE EPP WOULD NOT BE WHAT THE PARTY IS TODAy” Wilfried Martens, geboren am 19. April 1936 im belgischen Sleidinge, Studium der Rechtswissenschaften an der Katholischen Universität Leuven, 1960 Promotion zum Dr. jur., Mitglied und später Präsident der Katholiek Vlaams Hoogstudenten Verbond, 1960–1965 praktizierender Rechtsanwalt, 1965 Berater des belgischen Premierministers Pierre Harmel,552 1966 Berater von Premierminister Paul Vanden Boeynants,553 1968 Sonderbeauftragter für Gemeinschaftsangelegenheiten unter Premierminister Leo Tindemans, 1974–1991 Mitglied der belgischen Abgeordnetenkammer, 1979–1981 und 1981–1992 Premierminister Belgiens, seit 1990 Präsident der EVP, 1991–1994 Senator, 1993–1996 Präsident der EUCD, 1994–1999 Mitglied des EP, Faktionsvorsitzender der EVP. Das Interview fand am 31. Mai 2012 in Brüssel statt und wurde geführt von Marcus Gonschor und Hinnerk Meyer. Mr President, you were born in Sleidinge in 1936. Could you please tell us something about your origins, your parental home and your time in school? I was born on a very small farm in the outskirts of the local community or local commune in Sleidinge. I was born in 1936. I remember the beginning of the war in 1940. I was on a bicycle with a young girl trans- 552 | Pierre Harmel (1911–2009), belgischer Politiker der PSC, 1965/66 Premierminister, 1966–1972 Außenminister seines Landes. 553 | Paul Vanden Boeynants (1919–2001), belgischer Politiker der PSC, 1966–1968 und 1978/79 Premierminister seines Landes. 622 porting me to the kindergarten. She said to me: ”Look in the sky! There are planes.” That was the beginning of the war. I have this memory still vivid.
    [Show full text]
  • Birkbeck Institutional Research Online
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Birkbeck Institutional Research Online Birkbeck ePrints BIROn - Birkbeck Institutional Research Online Enabling open access to Birkbeck’s published research output The panhellenic Socialist movement and European integration: the primacy of the leader Book chapter (Author’s draft) http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/5079 Citation: Dimitrakopoulos, D.; Passas, A.G. (2010) The panhellenic Socialist movement and European integration: the primacy of the leader In Dimitrakopoulos, D. (Ed.) - Social Democracy and European Integration: The Politics of Preference Formation (ISBN: 9780415559850) © 2010 Routledge Publisher Page ______________________________________________________________ All articles available through Birkbeck ePrints are protected by intellectual property law, including copyright law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. ______________________________________________________________ Deposit Guide Contact: [email protected] Published in Social Democracy and European Integration: The Politics of Preference Formation, edited by D. G. Dimitrakopoulos, 117-156. London/New York: Routledge, 2010. 4 The Panhellenic Socialist Movement and European Integration: The Primacy of the Leader Dionyssis G. Dimitrakopoulos and Argyris G. Passas Introduction1 This chapter focuses on the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) and seeks to trace the origin and the content of its preferences on European integration since its establishment in 1974. It challenges the established view that – couched as it is in PASOK’s rhetoric in the immediate post-1974 era – construes PASOK as an initially instinctively anti-European political party that subsequently performed a policy U- turn, a true political transformation by turning from a vocal anti-EEC stance to a pro- European (even federalist) attitude (Tsardanidis 1998, 295, 299, 300; Kazakos 1994, 5; Verney 1987, 259-60, 263; Featherstone 1988, 178; Couloumbis 1993, 126; Featherstone 1994, 158-9).
    [Show full text]
  • POLICE VIOLENCE in GREECE 5 Not Just ‘Isolated Incidents’
    Police violence in G reece Not JUst ‘IsolatEd INcIdENts’ amnesty international is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the universal declaration of Human rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. First published in 2012 by amnesty international ltd Peter Benenson House 1 easton street london Wc1X 0dW united Kingdom © amnesty international 2012 index: eur 25/005/2012 english original language: english Printed by amnesty international, international secretariat, united Kingdom all rights reserved. this publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. the copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. to request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo : a Greek riot police officer kicks a protester during clashes in syntagma square, athens, 15 june 2011. © aP Photo/lefteris Pitarakis amnesty.org
    [Show full text]
  • Preuzimanje (12.905 Kb
    MEMO/10/450 Brussels, 27 September 2010 Joint statement by Mr Christos Papoutsis, Minister of Citizen Protection of Greece and Cecilia Malmström, European Commissioner in charge of Home Affairs: Greece and the Commission agree to enhance cooperation on reforming the Greek asylum system 1. The Minister of Citizen Protection Mr Christos Papoutsis and the European Commissioner for Home Affairs, Ms Cecilia Malmström met in Athens on 27 September to discuss ways to assist Greece in its efforts to reform the Greek asylum system. 2. They acknowledge the unprecedented pressure on the Greek asylum and migration management system, which is a result of large number of persons from third countries entering Greek territory both as irregular migrants and as asylum seekers, due to its geographical position at the EU external borders. Greece underlines the additional burden as a result of the implementation of the Dublin II Regulation. In the framework of a common European migration and asylum policy, the challenges faced by Greece have to be commonly addressed by the European Union as a whole. 3. The Greek Government has decided to reform the national asylum system, in order to better address, in an efficient and coherent way, the needs of asylum seekers arriving in Greece. 4. The European Commission greatly values the strong commitment of the Greek government to undertake all possible efforts and considers that it is paramount to make rapid progress in improving the situation. 5. Coordination is needed at European level to address pressures on the Greek national asylum and reception system. The Commission and the EU Member States have already expressed their readiness to assist Greece in the implementation of the ambitious plan of reforms.
    [Show full text]