West LRT 2013 Survey Results

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

West LRT 2013 Survey Results What are West LRT Customers Telling Us? IM-09-03 West LRT Customer Survey West LRT Customer Survey Results ISC: Unrestricted Legend: Excellent Good Fair Poor 1,830 customers heard from... LRT Infrastructure Perceptions Bus Perceptions F O L B e v e u O e B n s W v li e g f e n ik ra t c T r e r D g P e l h o r e C a a a i o r l B o a C q T th p ll re f e a im u n ff r i u r e p s c s d p c s s f g ic o t e a r e t t a e r k e p b e w c n in p a a io f s o s r s u s e o c r r ti n e tr v o rv e t s t n d m p o a o a ty ia id i s o io i y la t n n l n e r c p r c n e / t e c d s / d lo e s o n o g s fo c e e L i s a c io lo u / u / h r tio s ig g e c k n c t d n c o m n i h n cu c e e t o w g t a r e rs o a ( e e o n in g i s f ti t la r m o n / g e ty s if t o im y e f f h n s d o te LRT Sta tio n e s e / r n ) t 69 Street Station 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Bus Ro ute 3 3 3 3 3 3 Sirocco Station 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 Killarney - 17 Ave / Mount Pleasant 45 Street Station 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 Killarney - 26 Avenue 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 Westbrook Station 7 South Calgary 3 3 3 2 2 2 Shaganappi Point Station 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 72 Circle Route 3 3 3 3 3 2 Sunalta Station 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 73 Circle Route 3 3 3 3 3 2 93 Coach Hill / Westbrook 3 3 3 3 3 2 94 Strathcona / Westbrook 3 3 3 3 3 2 98 Cougar Ridge 3 3 2 2 2 2 LRT Service Perceptions 112 Sarcee Road 3 3 3 3 2 2 Aspect Rating 306 BRT Westbrook / Heritage 3 3 3 3 4 2 2 3 3 3 3 1 Overall impression of West LRT 3 412 Westgate / Beltline 3 3 2 2 3 2 Station locations 3 439 Discovery Ridge 3 3 3 3 2 1 CTrain frequency 3 452 Wentworth 453 West Springs 3 3 3 3 3 3 Crowding on the CTrain 3 454 Springbank Hill 3 3 4 3 4 3 Comfort while riding on the CTrain 3 456 Aspen Woods 3 3 2 3 2 2 Overall transit experience on the West LRT 3 Routes with 5 or less responses not included West LRT Perceptions and Changes TALKING POINTS: • Replacing Express Routes with bus and O v U e CTrain is disruptive to customers n r c a h ll a W R B n e g o a • 73% Overall satisfaction with West LRT t e r ti te d s n Aspect r e g • 12% of respondents are new transit Starting time of your trip 37% 40% 23% 3 customers Overall trip length (time) 50% 15% 35% 3 Comfort while riding 54% 28% 18% 4 • 91% of new customers previously used a Crowding 47% 26% 26% 3 private vehicle to make their trips CT Connections / Transfers 38% 20% 42% 3 Buses running on time 36% 40% 24% 3 • 24% of respondents use park and ride New bus routes 31% 23% 46% 3 Overall experience using Calgary Transit 57% 16% 27% 3 • Number of parking spaces at park and ride lots is a concern with respondents Difference in Travel Time 180 Faster (48%) Unchanged (14%) Slower (38%) 160 140 120 100 Fasterfor 48% of respondents saving 15.5 minutes of travel 80 60 40 20 0 -85 -80 -75 -70 -65 -60 -55 -50 -45 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 Minutes Difference.
Recommended publications
  • Corporate Registry Registrar's Periodical Template
    Service Alberta ____________________ Corporate Registry ____________________ Registrar’s Periodical REGISTRAR’S PERIODICAL, OCTOBER 15, 2009 SERVICE ALBERTA Corporate Registrations, Incorporations, and Continuations (Business Corporations Act, Cemetery Companies Act, Companies Act, Cooperatives Act, Credit Union Act, Loan and Trust Corporations Act, Religious Societies’ Land Act, Rural Utilities Act, Societies Act, Partnership Act) 0858562 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps 1487822 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Registered 2009 SEP 08 Registered Address: 2700 Corporation Incorporated 2009 SEP 01 Registered COMMERCE PLACE, 10155 - 102 STREET, Address: 127 SENECA ROAD, SHERWOOD PARK EDMONTON ALBERTA, T5J 4G8. No: 2114889252. ALBERTA, T8A 4G6. No: 2014878223. 0859953 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps 1487828 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Registered 2009 SEP 15 Registered Address: 1200, 700 - Corporation Incorporated 2009 SEP 01 Registered 2ND STREET SW, CALGARY ALBERTA, T2P 4V5. Address: 10040 87 AVE NW, EDMONTON No: 2114902543. ALBERTA, T6E 2N9. No: 2014878280. 101142932 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. Other 1487831 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2009 SEP 11 Registered Corporation Incorporated 2009 SEP 01 Registered Address: 499 - 1 STREET SE, MEDICINE HAT Address: 3812 MACNEIL HEATH, EDMONTON ALBERTA, T1A 0A7. No: 2114895259. ALBERTA, T6R 0H5. No: 2014878314. 1481801 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta 1487832 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Corporation Incorporated 2009 SEP 07 Registered Corporation Incorporated 2009 SEP 01 Registered Address: 1013 5TH AVENUE, WAINWRIGHT Address: 2056 TANNER WYND, EDMONTON ALBERTA, T9W 1L6. No: 2014818013. ALBERTA, T6R 2R4. No: 2014878322. 1485500 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta 1487845 ALBERTA LTD. Numbered Alberta Corporation Incorporated 2009 SEP 02 Registered Corporation Incorporated 2009 SEP 03 Registered Address: 2401 TD TOWER, 10088 102 AVENUE, Address: 4007-34A AVENUE NW, EDMONTON EDMONTON ALBERTA, T5J 2Z1.
    [Show full text]
  • Calgary-Bow Valley Mass Transit Report
    REPORT Calgary -Bow Valley Mass Transit Feasibility Study (Client Reference: RFP 1-500-5330-5320) Final Report Prepared for: The Town of Banff Prepared by: CPCS In association with sub-contractors: Dillon Consulting Ltd. Dominion Railway Services Ltd. Iron Moustache CPCS Ref: 17191 November 5, 2018 REPORT | Calgary-Bow Valley Mass Transit Feasibility Study Client Ref: RFP 1-500-5330-5320 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ i Acronyms / Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. ix 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 1 Project Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 2 Project Structure ....................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 2 Limitations ................................................................................................................................. 3 Outline of this Report
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the City Shaping Implementation Strategy
    CPS2018-1355 ATTACHMENT 2 Overview of the City Shaping Implementation Strategy CPS2018-1355 Green Line City Shaping Update - Att 2 ISC: UNRESTRICTED CPS2018-1355 City Shaping Implementation StrategyATTACHMENT 2 Implementation Strategy The City Shaping Implementation Strategy has been developed following the approval of the City Shaping Framework in 2017 June (CPS2017-0469), with a focus on improving the social well-being of the communities along the Green Line. As a long-term project, the realization of the social, economic, environmental and cultural benefits of City Shaping will take time. Implementation must be strategically phased to encourage the advancement of social resilience on opening day and into the future. Looking Ahead The City Shaping Implementation Strategy and the three work streams were developed through internal engagement, senior leadership oversight and using direction laid out in the Framework. The initial phase of the Implementation Strategy is focused on keeping pace with the Green Line project execution and construction timelines and advancing the goals outlined in the Framework in the 2019-2022 budget cycle. City Shaping work, in two of the three work streams will be captured within the Green Line Project and current funding envelope. Project Input (resourced within the Green Line) • City Shaping will continue to influence the infrastructure design, station integration and contract 100-year | imagineCALGARY documents. Work will also focus on defining metrics to measure the City Shaping success opening day and 60-year | MDP + CTP into the future. 50-year | City Shaping Framework Community Support (resourced within the Green Line) • Community support is focused on people’s experience 10-30-year | Strategies on transit as well as community integration with include: Pedestrian Strategy, the station areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng
    Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit 1. Plan It Calgary – the new Municipal Development Plan and Calgary Transportation Plan 2. Primary Transit Network, LRT Expansion and BRT Network Plan 3. CRP Regional Transit Plan ‘Creating a new transit vision for Calgary and Region.’ 2009 Municipal Development Plan and Calgary Transportation Plan WHERE DO WE GROW FROM HERE? KEY FOCUS: • How can we accommodate an additional 1.3 million people and 600,000 jobs over the next 50 - 60 years? – Where will they live? – Where will they work? – How will they travel? – What are the implications? 3 KEY DIRECTIONS FOR LAND USE & MOBILITY 1. Balance growth between established and greenfield (new) communities. 2. Provide more choice within complete communities. 3. Direct land use change within a framework of nodes and corridors. 4. Link land use decisions to transit. 5. Increase mobility choices. 6. Develop a Primary Transit Network. 7. Create complete streets. 8. Optimize infrastructure. 4 A NEW TRANSIT VISION Objective To make Calgary Transit the preferred mobility choice of Calgarians. 5 A NEW TRANSIT VISION • Develop a high capacity Primary Transit Network, integrated with supportive transit oriented development. • Optimize Primary Transit Network design. – frequency, speed, reliability, comfort. – make it convenient to live close to Primary Transit without needing a private auto. • Integrate Primary Transit Network with regional /inter-city passenger modes.
    [Show full text]
  • Calgary-Bow Valley Mass Transit Feasibility Study Client Ref: RFP 1-500-5330-5320
    REPORT Calgary -Bow Valley Mass Transit Feasibility Study (Client Reference: RFP 1-500-5330-5320) Final Report Prepared for: The Town of Banff Prepared by: CPCS In association with sub-contractors: Dillon Consulting Ltd. Dominion Railway Services Ltd. Iron Moustache CPCS Ref: 17191 November 5, 2018 REPORT | Calgary-Bow Valley Mass Transit Feasibility Study Client Ref: RFP 1-500-5330-5320 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ i Acronyms / Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. ix 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 1 Project Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 2 Project Structure ....................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 2 Limitations ................................................................................................................................. 3 Outline of this Report
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Twitter Data to Support Transit Planning and Operations
    Leveraging Twitter Data to Support Transit Planning and Operations by Omar Kabbani A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering University of Toronto © Copyright by Omar Kabbani 2020 i Leveraging Twitter Data to Support Transit Planning and Operations Omar Kabbani Master of Applied Science Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering University of Toronto 2020 Abstract Twitter provides an unfiltered and timestamped feed of information that can be aggregated to generate valuable insights. This research creates a framework for processing a public Twitter feed to generate insights on rider satisfaction and to identify passenger–related transit incidents. Detecting these incidents in real time enables transit agencies to immediately respond to them by dispatching security, safety, or maintenance crews, and in the context of the current COVID–19 pandemic, to provide targeted cleaning measures to combat the spread of the virus. Using natural language processing, we identify eyewitness tweets about transit and then extract latent information from the tweets such as location details, sentiments, and topics. This enables agencies to respond to an incident faster and to identify spatial and temporal patterns for incidents and interests throughout the network. ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my family and friends, whose names would span pages if I were to mention them one by one. Additionally, I would like to thank my research supervisors, Professors Amer Shalaby, Tamer El–Diraby, and Willem Klumpenhouwer who believed in my abilities and presented me with this opportunity. This work would not have been possible without their constant guidance and supervision.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Line LRT in My Community What We Heard Report Above Grade Stations Inglewood/Ramsay and 26 Ave S.E
    Green Line LRT in My Community What we heard report Above Grade Stations Inglewood/Ramsay and 26 Ave S.E. April 2018 Project overview On June 26, 2017, City Council approved the full vision for the Green Line LRT. The vision for Green Line includes a 46 km route from 160 Avenue North to Seton, and 28 stations. Construction on the first 20 km is anticipated to begin in 2020, and will extend from 16 Avenue N (Crescent Heights) to 126 Avenue SE (Shepard). Construction of Stage 1 is expected to be complete by 2026. Once Stage 1 is complete, extensions will be built as funds become available to complete the full vision. The purpose of the engagement was to gather input on safety and security, aesthetics and landscaping, and access to stations to help develop guiding technical documents that will be used during construction of Green Line – Stage 1. Engagement overview In January and February 2018, The City of Calgary held open houses and pop-up sessions with community members to provide information about the Green Line LRT - Stage 1 and to collect input on station design, station area look and feel, safety and security and community experience. From January 18, 2018 to February 13, 2018 The City of Calgary hosted an online survey on its engagement portal at engage.calgary.ca/GreenLine to solicit feedback from Calgarians. Input collected from the public will be reflected in the technical documents that will guide the construction of the Green Line – Stage 1. Open house sessions for elevated stations were held at the Inglewood Community Association on January 23, 2018 and Fort Calgary on February 10, 2018.
    [Show full text]