The New Radical-Right

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The New Radical-Right MASARYK UNIVERSITY Faculty of Social Studies Department of Political Science The New Radical-Right: Analysis in Selected European States Diploma Thesis Bc. Kateřina Lišaníková Supervisor: Mgr. et Mgr. Petra Vejvodová, Ph.D. UČO: 397916 Security and Strategic Studies Master’s Full-Time Study Matriculation Year 2014 In Brno, 18. 12. 2016 Declaration of authorship I declare that I wrote the Diploma Thesis The New Radical-Right: Analysis in Selected European States by myself only and that I solely used the literature in the reference list. In Brno, 18.12. 2016 .................................................... Bc. Kateřina Lišaníková 1 Special thanks to: Ms. Petra Vejvodová for supervision of this Diploma Thesis and her valuable notes and thoughts through the whole process of writing. Also, special thanks to Mr. Rufus Latham from the SND Swedish National Data Service for providing me with requested dataset and to Mr. Alexander Gilder for language cooperation. 2 Content Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 7 1. Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.1. Operationalisation ...................................................................................................... 12 1.2. Conceptualisation ...................................................................................................... 15 2. Short Overview of the Parties’ History ............................................................................. 20 3.1. Danish People’s Party .................................................................................................... 20 3.2. Sweden Democrats ........................................................................................................ 21 3. Danish People’s Party and Sweden Democrats’ Manifestos ............................................ 23 3.1. Danish People’s Party’s Manifesto ............................................................................ 23 3.2. Sweden Democrats’ Manifesto .................................................................................. 26 4. Differences Between Analysed Manifestos ...................................................................... 29 5. Public Opinion in Sweden and Denmark .......................................................................... 33 5.1. Danish Public Opinion ............................................................................................... 34 5.2. Swedish Public Opinion ............................................................................................ 43 6. Danish and Swedish Mainstream Parties’ Offer ............................................................... 54 6.1. Danish Mainstream Parties ........................................................................................ 54 6.3. Swedish Mainstream Parties ...................................................................................... 57 7. Reflection of Public Demand and Role of Mainstream Parties ........................................ 61 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 72 Reference .............................................................................................................................. 75 Appendix .................................................................................................................................. 85 3 Anotace Analýza v tomto textu je zaměřena na dvě krajně pravicové strany v Dánsku a ve Švédsku: Dánskou lidovou stranu a Švédské demokraty. Nebývale rychlý úspěch a nárůst preferenčních hlasů při parlamentních volbách společně s faktem, že obě dvě strany pochází z extrémistických uskupení přinutili širokou veřejnost dojít k přesvědčení, že obě strany patří do populistické krajní pravice. Práce se proto zaměřila na zkoumání vztahu nabídky těchto politických stran v kontextu poptávky po důležitých tématech u Švédů a Dánů společně se vstupujícím elementem mainstreamových stran. Analýza došla k závěru, že se v případě Švédských demokratů jedná o stranu jednoho tématu, tedy imigrace, která nedokáže v širším měřítku uspokojit potřeby švédské populace, jíž zajímá nejvíce téma ekonomiky, zaměstnanosti a vzdělávání. Zde mainstreamové strany vstupují do vztahu nabídky / poptávky velmi nezřetelně, a to adoptováním některých restriktivních opatření v oblasti imigrace. Naopak Dánská lidová strana má postavený program na nejdůležitějším tématu pro Dány, a to sociálním státu neboli welfare state. Imigrace, zejména ze zemí Blízkého východu, je pak vnímána velmi negativně jako něco, co narušuje fungování sociálního státu. Celkově pak Dánská lidová strana představuje menší odchýlení od mainstreamového politického spektra, než je tomu u Švédských demokratů, kterým pokud nezačnou propagovat také další části svého programu stejně jako to dělají u imigračního tématu, hrozí pomalý úpadek na politické straně, neboť jejich téma plně přeberou mainstreamové strany a oni se tak stanou pro běžné Švédy nezajímavými. Abstract The analysis of this thesis focuses on two radical-right parties in Denmark and Sweden. Namely, the Danish People’s Party and the Sweden Democrats. The public has come to the conclusion that these parties are populist radical-right due to their unprecedented, rapidly increasing success in parliamentary elections and the historical background, which is rooted in the extreme right. Therefore, the text analyses the relationship between the political offerings of these parties and public demand of the Swedes and Danes alongside what the mainstream parties’ offer. The conclusion is that the Sweden Democrats are a single-issue party focused on immigration only and cannot satisfy the demand of Swedes, which is the topic of economy, employment and education. The mainstream parties step up into the demand/offer relationship very shallowly by adopting some of the counter immigration measures. Contrary, the Danish People’s Party built up its program on welfare state issues, which concern the Danes most. 4 Further, immigration, especially from the Middle East, is perceived as something that threatens the functioning of the welfare state. Overall, the Danish People’s Party represents less deviation from mainstream politics unlike the Sweden Democrats. The Sweden Democrats may become less attractive for Swedish voters once the mainstream parties take over their key issues, if they do not start to push on other topics of their manifesto besides immigration. 5 Klíčová slova Dánská lidová strana, Dánsko, Eurobarometr, imigrace, krajní pravice, Liberální strana, Sociální demokraté, Švédsko, Švédští demokraté, Umírněná strana, veřejné mínění, volby Key words Danish People’s Party, Denmark, elections, Eurobarometer, immigration, Liberal Party, Moderate Party, public opinion, Social Democrats, Sweden, Sweden Democrats, radical-right 6 Introduction The current unprecedented immigration crisis which challenges Europe goes hand in hand with the phenomenon of the re-rising of radical-right political parties. These political parties have mostly built up their programs on the issue of the threat of refugees and try to influence voters by reminding them of the importance of nationalism. Several years ago, very few of them would have been successful with such performances. Nevertheless, in the face of current refugee waves to Europe, these parties have been more successful than ever before – some of them have even became part of the government or very strong opposition. In connection to this trend, the media has started to warn over Europe turning to the extreme right once again. Yet, the European citizens turn to these political parties as the only political subjects, which really care about their needs. Again, some scholars and media calls it populism, some people see it as awakening of Europe and punishment of the establishment, which has been ignoring the demand of citizens for the past twenty years. The new radical-right parties call the mainstream politicians the corrupted elite. Albeit there have been tendencies to isolate such parties, these new radical-right subjects gained even more power in parliamentary elections and showed the mainstream that they cannot ignore the voice of their people. Over a very short period, lots of European think-tanks have produced many articles and books summarizing current re-emergence of these radical-right parties on the old continent; however very few of them are seeking the basis of the new radical-right: what drives their success? Do they have any comprehensive manifestos to rule the countries or are they just being populist by promoting what is currently the most concerning issue in Europe? And do the mainstream parties ignore the society’s concerns by excluding the topic of immigration from their agenda? The immigration wave particularly hit Sweden and Denmark, where the success of the Danish People’s Party (DPP) and the Sweden Democrats (SD) was the most visible. Even though there are two radical-right parties in the neighbourhood countries, established at the same time, their paths significantly differ. While the Sweden Democrats remain in opposition without any ally in the parliament, the Danish People’s Party made an agreement with the governmental coalition. Nevertheless, both belong among the most successful radical-right parties in Europe. In this
Recommended publications
  • SE Analytical Factsheet for Sweden
    version: September 2019 SE Analytical factsheet for Sweden: Nine objectives for a future Common Agricultural Policy This factsheet provides an overview of the agricultural sector and rural development in Sweden. The factsheet presents facts and figures for each of the 9 specific objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy after 2020, as proposed by the Commission on 1 June 2018 (COM(2018)392 final). The information reflects all common context indicators and impact indicators in relation to agriculture and rural development for which data is available to date. This factsheet is based on available information received from Member States by the Commission up to August 2019. It is made available without prejudice to any finding in respect of Member State compliance with the regulatory framework and does not prejudge on Member States' future CAP Strategic Plans. 1 Table of contents impact in Indicator Source Current CMEF indicator PMEF Support viable farm income and resilience across the Union to enhance food security Agricultural income versus general economy EUROSTAT yes Impact indicator I.01 Evolution of agricultural income EUROSTAT yes Impact indicators I.01 & I.02 Evolution of agricultural income by sector DG AGRI - FADN yes Evolution of agricultural income by farm size DG AGRI - FADN Evolution of agricultural income in ANC areas DG AGRI - FADN yes Enhance market orientation and increase competitiveness Total factor productivity EUROSTAT yes Impact indicator I.03 Gross fixed capital formation in agriculture EUROSTAT Context indicator
    [Show full text]
  • Pertussis Surveillance in Sweden, Twenty-Year Report
    Pertussis surveillance in Sweden Twenty-year report Pertussis surveillance in Sweden Twenty-year report Bindningar och jäv För Folkhälsomyndighetens egna experter och utredare som medverkat i rapporter bedöms eventuella intressekonflikter och jäv inom ramen for anställningsförhållandet. När det gäller externa experter och utredare som deltar i Folkhälsomyndighetens arbete med rapporter kräver myndigheten att de lämnar skriftliga jävsdeklarationer för potentiella intressekonflikter eller jäv. Sådana omständigheter kan föreligga om en expert t.ex. fått eller får ekonomisk ersättning från en aktör med intressen i utgången av den fråga som myndigheten behandlar eller om det finns ett tidigare eller pågående ställningstagande eller engagemang i den aktuella frågan på ett sådant sätt att det uppkommer misstanke om att opartiskheten inte kan upprätthållas. Folkhälsomyndigheten tar därefter ställning till om det finns några omständigheter som skulle försvåra en objektiv värdering av det framtagna materialet och därmed inverka på myndighetens möjligheter att agera sakligt och opartiskt. Bedömningen kan mynna ut i att experten kan anlitas för uppdraget alternativt att myndigheten föreslår vissa åtgärder beträffande expertens engagemang eller att experten inte bedöms kunna delta i det aktuella arbetet. De externa experter som medverkat i framtagandet av denna rapport har inför arbetet i enlighet med Folkhälsomyndighetens krav lämnat en deklaration av eventuella intressekonflikter och jäv. Folkhälsomyndigheten har därefter bedömt att det inte föreligger några omständigheter som skulle kunna äventyra myndighetens trovärdighet. Jävsdeklarationerna och eventuella kompletterande dokument utgör allmänna handlingar som normalt är offentliga handlingarna finns tillgängliga på Folkhälsomyndigheten. Denna titel kan laddas ner från: www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/publicerat-material Citera gärna Folkhälsomyndighetens texter, men glöm inte att uppge källan.
    [Show full text]
  • Pertussis Surveillance in Sweden, Nineteen
    Pertussis surveillance in Sweden Nineteen-year report Pertussis surveillance in Sweden Nineteen-year report Bindningar och jäv För Folkhälsomyndighetens egna experter och utredare som medverkat i rapporter bedöms eventuella intressekonflikter och jäv inom ramen för anställningsförhållandet. När det gäller externa experter och utredare som deltar i Folkhälsomyndighetens arbete med rapporter kräver myndigheten att de lämnar skriftliga jävsdeklarationer för potentiella intressekonflikter eller jäv. Sådana omständigheter kan föreligga om en expert t.ex. fått eller får ekonomisk ersättning från en aktör med intressen i utgången av den fråga som myndigheten behandlar eller om det finns ett tidigare eller pågående ställningstagande eller engagemang i den aktuella frågan på ett sådant sätt att det uppkommer misstanke om att opartiskheten inte kan upprätthållas. Folkhälsomyndigheten tar därefter ställning till om det finns några omständigheter som skulle försvåra en objektiv värdering av det framtagna materialet och därmed inverka på myndighetens möjligheter att agera sakligt och opartiskt. Bedömningen kan mynna ut i att experten kan anlitas för uppdraget alternativt att myndigheten föreslår vissa åtgärder beträffande expertens engagemang eller att experten inte bedöms kunna delta i det aktuella arbetet. De externa experter som medverkat i framtagandet av denna rapport har inför arbetet i enlighet med Folkhälsomyndighetens krav lämnat en deklaration av eventuella intressekonflikter och jäv. Folkhälsomyndigheten har därefter bedömt att det inte föreligger några omständigheter som skulle kunna äventyra myndighetens trovärdighet. Jävsdeklarationerna och eventuella kompletterande dokument utgör allmänna handlingar som normalt är offentliga handlingarna finns tillgängliga på Folkhälsomyndigheten. Denna titel kan laddas ner från: www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/publicerat-material Citera gärna Folkhälsomyndighetens texter, men glöm inte att uppge källan.
    [Show full text]
  • Nordic Homicide Report
    UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES IN STI TUTE OF CRIM IN O LOGY AND LEGAL POLICY RESEARCH BRIEFS 37/2019 NORDIC HOMICIDE REPORT HOMICIDE IN DENMARK, FINLAND, ICELAND, NORWAY AND SWEDEN, 2007–2016 MARTTI LEHTI, JANNE KIVIVUORI, GUÐBJÖRG S. BERGSDÓTTIR, HEIDI ENGVOLD, SVEN GRANATH, JÓNAS O. JÓNASSON, MARIEKE LIEM, MIKKEL M. OKHOLM, MONA RAUTELIN, KAROLIINA SUONPÄÄ AND VIBEKE S. SYVERSEN Publisher University of Helsinki Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy www.helsinki.fi/en/institute-of-criminology-and-legal-policy PL 24, Unioninkatu 40 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO Series Research Briefs 37/2019 ISBN 978-951-51-0669-8 (pdf) ISSN 2342-7779 (pdf) CONTENTS Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 Foreword .................................................................................................................. 2 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 3 2 Data and Terminology ........................................................................................... 5 2.1 Denmark ................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Finland .................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Iceland .................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Norway ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]