DOCSLIB.ORG

211281Orig1s000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
211281Orig1s000 CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 211281Orig1s000 MULTI-DISCIPLINE REVIEW Summary Review Office Director Cross Discipline Team Leader Review Clinical Review Non-Clinical Review Statistical Review Clinical Pharmacology Review NDA Multi-Disciplinary Review and Evaluation – NDA 211281 Pizensy (lactitol) NDA/BLA Multi-Disciplinary Review and Evaluation Application Type NDA 505(b)(2) Application Number(s) 211281 Priority or Standard Standard Submit Date(s) November 21, 2018 Received Date(s) November 21, 2018 PDUFA Goal Date February 20, 2020 (due to major amendment) Division/Office OND / ODEIII / DGIEP Review Completion Date February 12, 2020 Established/Proper Name Lactitol (Proposed) Trade Name Pizensy Pharmacologic Class Osmotic laxative Applicant Braintree Laboratories Inc. Dosage Form Powder for oral solution (b) (4) Applicant Proposed Dosing Regimen Applicant Proposed The treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) in adults Indication(s)/Population(s) Applicant Proposed 82934008 chronic idiopathic constipation SNOMED CT Indication Disease Term for Each Proposed Indication Recommendation on Approval Regulatory Action Recommended Dosing 20 grams orally once daily, preferably with meals. Regimen Reduce the dosage to 10 grams once daily for persistent loose stools. Administer oral medications at least 2 hours before or 2 hours after Pizensy (lactitol). 1 Version date: October 12, 2018 Reference ID: 4560397 NDA Multi-Disciplinary Review and Evaluation – NDA 211281 Pizensy (lactitol) Table of Contents Table of Tables .......................................................................................................................... 5 Table of Figures ......................................................................................................................... 7 Reviewers of Multi-Disciplinary Review and Evaluation .............................................................. 8 Glossary..................................................................................................................................... 9 1 Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................10 Product Introduction ....................................................................................................10 Conclusions on the Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness ..........................................10 Benefit-Risk Assessment ............................................................................................12 Patient Experience Data .............................................................................................18 2 Therapeutic Context ...........................................................................................................19 Analysis of Condition ..................................................................................................19 Analysis of Current Treatment Options .......................................................................20 3 Regulatory Background ......................................................................................................22 U.S. Regulatory Actions and Marketing History ...........................................................22 Summary of Presubmission/Submission Regulatory Activity .......................................22 4 Significant Issues From Other Review Disciplines Pertinent to Clinical Conclusions on Efficacy and Safety ............................................................................................................26 Office of Scientific Investigations (OSI) .......................................................................26 Product Quality ...........................................................................................................27 5 Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology ................................................................................29 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................29 Referenced NDAs, BLAs, DMFs .................................................................................30 Pharmacology .............................................................................................................30 ADME/PK ...................................................................................................................31 Toxicology ..................................................................................................................35 General Toxicology ..............................................................................................35 Genetic Toxicology ..............................................................................................38 Carcinogenicity ....................................................................................................38 Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology ......................................................39 Other Toxicology Studies .....................................................................................42 6 Clinical Pharmacology........................................................................................................45 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................45 Recommendations ...............................................................................................45 Summary of Clinical Pharmacology Assessment ........................................................46 Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacokinetics ......................................................46 General Dosing and Therapeutic Individualization ...............................................46 Comprehensive Clinical Pharmacology Review ..........................................................47 General Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics ..............................47 2 Version date: October 12, 2018 Reference ID: 4560397 NDA Multi-Disciplinary Review and Evaluation – NDA 211281 Pizensy (lactitol) Clinical Pharmacology Questions .........................................................................49 7 Sources of Clinical Data and Review Strategy ...................................................................52 Table of Clinical Studies..............................................................................................52 Efficacy Review Strategy ............................................................................................53 8 Statistical and Clinical and Evaluation ................................................................................53 Review of Relevant Individual Trials Used To Support Efficacy...................................53 BLI400-302 (Study 302) .......................................................................................53 BLI400-301 (Study 301) .......................................................................................66 Review of Supportive Literature ...........................................................................76 Comparison of Lactitol to Historical Controls ........................................................80 BLI400-303 (Study 303) .......................................................................................81 Assessment of Efficacy Across Trials ..................................................................88 Integrated Assessment of Effectiveness ..............................................................89 Review of Safety .........................................................................................................89 Safety Review Approach ......................................................................................89 Review of the Safety Database ............................................................................90 Adequacy of Applicant’s Clinical Safety Assessments .........................................90 Safety Results ......................................................................................................91 Safety Analyses by Demographic Subgroups ....................................................104 Additional Safety Explorations ...........................................................................110 Safety in the Postmarket Setting ........................................................................111 Integrated Assessment of Safety .......................................................................113 Conclusions and Recommendations .........................................................................113 9 Advisory Committee Meeting and Other External Consultations ......................................113 10 Pediatrics .........................................................................................................................114 11 Labeling Recommendations .............................................................................................114 12 Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) ...........................................................116 13 Postmarketing Requirements and Commitment ...............................................................116 14 Division Associate Director (Clinical/DGIEP) Comments ..................................................117 15 Appendices ......................................................................................................................119 References ............................................................................................................119
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice
    CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Constipation Ian M. Paquette, M.D. • Madhulika Varma, M.D. • Charles Ternent, M.D. Genevieve Melton-Meaux, M.D. • Janice F. Rafferty, M.D. • Daniel Feingold, M.D. Scott R. Steele, M.D. he American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons for functional constipation include at least 2 of the fol- is dedicated to assuring high-quality patient care lowing symptoms during ≥25% of defecations: straining, Tby advancing the science, prevention, and manage- lumpy or hard stools, sensation of incomplete evacuation, ment of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage, relying on anus. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee is com- manual maneuvers to promote defecation, and having less posed of Society members who are chosen because they than 3 unassisted bowel movements per week.7,8 These cri- XXX have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and teria include constipation related to the 3 common sub- rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead inter- types: colonic inertia or slow transit constipation, normal national efforts in defining quality care for conditions re- transit constipation, and pelvic floor or defecation dys- lated to the colon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied function. However, in reality, many patients demonstrate by developing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the symptoms attributable to more than 1 constipation sub- best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive and type and to constipation-predominant IBS, as well. The not prescriptive.
    [Show full text]
  • Anorectal Disorders Satish S
    Gastroenterology 2016;150:1430–1442 Anorectal Disorders Satish S. C. Rao,1 Adil E. Bharucha,2 Giuseppe Chiarioni,3,4 Richelle Felt-Bersma,5 Charles Knowles,6 Allison Malcolm,7 and Arnold Wald8 1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia; 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota; 3Division of Gastroenterology of the University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy; 4Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and UNC Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 5Department of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 6National Centre for Bowel Research and Surgical Innovation, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; 7Division of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; 8Division of Gastroenterology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin This report defines criteria and reviews the epidemiology, questionnaires and bowel diaries are correlated,5 some pathophysiology, and management of the following com- patients may not accurately recall bowel symptoms6; hence, mon anorectal disorders: fecal incontinence (FI), func- symptom diaries may be more reliable. tional anorectal pain, and functional defecation disorders. In this report, we examine the prevalence and patho- FI is defined as the recurrent uncontrolled passage of fecal physiology of anorectal disorders, listed in Table 1,and material for at least 3 months. The clinical features of FI provide recommendations for diagnostic evaluation and are useful for guiding diagnostic testing and therapy. management. These supplement practice guidelines rec- ANORECTAL Anorectal manometry and imaging are useful for evalu- ommended by the American Gastroenterological Associa- fl ating anal and pelvic oor structure and function.
    [Show full text]
  • Linaclotide: a Novel Therapy for Chronic Constipation and Constipation- Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome Brian E
    Linaclotide: A Novel Therapy for Chronic Constipation and Constipation- Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome Brian E. Lacy, PhD, MD, John M. Levenick, MD, and Michael D. Crowell, PhD, FACG Dr. Lacy is Section Chief of Gastroenter- Abstract: Chronic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome ology and Hepatology and Dr. Levenick (IBS) are functional gastrointestinal disorders that significantly is a Gastroenterology Fellow in the affect patients’ quality of life. Chronic constipation and IBS are Division of Gastroenterology and prevalent—12% of the US population meet the diagnostic crite- Hepatology at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, New ria for IBS, and 15% meet the criteria for chronic constipation— Hampshire. Dr. Crowell is a Professor and these conditions negatively impact the healthcare system of Medicine in the Division of from an economic perspective. Despite attempts at dietary Gastroenterology and Hepatology at modification, exercise, or use of over-the-counter medications, Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona. many patients have persistent symptoms. Alternative treatment options are limited. This article describes linaclotide (Linzess, Address correspondence to: Dr. Brian E. Lacy Ironwood Pharmaceuticals/Forest Pharmaceuticals), a new, first- Division of Gastroenterology and in-class medication for the treatment of chronic constipation Hepatology, Area 4C and constipation-predominant IBS. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center 1 Medical Center Drive Lebanon, NH 03756; Tel: 603-650-5215; Fax: 603-650-5225; onstipation is
    [Show full text]
  • Tegaserod in the Treatment of Constipation-Predominant Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
    DRUG PROFILE Tegaserod in the treatment of constipation-predominant functional gastrointestinal disorders Anurag Agrawal & Irritable bowel syndrome is a common condition for which, until recently, treatment Peter Whorwell† options have been limited. Tegaserod has selective serotonin subtype 4 receptor agonist †Author for correspondence activity and acts by increasing gastrointestinal motility, secretion and possibly reducing ERC Building, First Floor, Wythenshawe Hospital, visceral sensitivity. It has been developed to treat patients with irritable bowel syndrome Southmoor Road, who suffer from abdominal pain, constipation and bloating. Studies so far suggest that it is Manchester, M23 9LT, an effective treatment for these symptoms with an excellent safety profile. Its role in other UK Tel.: +44 161 291 5813 functional gastrointestinal disorders, such as functional dyspepsia, is still being assessed. Fax: +44 161 291 4184 This review describes the structure, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of tegaserod and its effect on gastrointestinal physiology, as well as its clinical utility. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most com- drugs such as antidiarrheals, laxatives, antispas- mon condition dealt with by gastroenterolo- modics and antidepressants. Behavioral therapy gists, accounting for up to 30% of their practice is sometimes tried in patients who do not and 10% of primary care case loads [1]. It is respond to conventional treatment. characterized by abdominal pain or discomfort In addition to its costs to the patient, IBS also often related to a change in bowel habit and fre- has a significant direct and indirect economic quently exacerbated by eating. Investigation burden. The direct cost in terms of healthcare reveals no structural abnormality, although a utilization has been estimated to be between variety of gastrointestinal (GI) physiological US$1.7–10 billion/year in the USA alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Constipation
    Constipation Constipation is defined as having a bowel movement fewer than three times per week. With constipation stools are usually hard, dry, Esophagus small in size, and difficult to eliminate. Some people who are constipated find it painful to Liver Stomach have a bowel movement and often experience straining, bloating, and the sensation of a full Pancreas bowel. Large Some people think they are constipated if they intestine do not have a bowel movement every day. However, normal stool elimination may be Small three times a day or three times a week, intestine depending on the person. Rectum Constipation is a symptom, not a disease. Anus Almost everyone experiences constipation at some point in their life, and a poor diet Appendix typically is the cause. Most constipation is temporary and not serious. Understanding its The digestive tract. causes, prevention, and treatment will help most people find relief. Self-treatment of constipation with overthe- counter (OTC) laxatives is by far the most Who gets constipated? common aid. Around $725 million is spent on Constipation is one of the most common laxative products each year in America. gastrointestinal complaints in the United States. More than 4 million Americans have frequent What causes constipation? constipation, accounting for 2.5 million To understand constipation, it helps to know physician visits a year. Those reporting how the colon, or large intestine, works. As food constipation most often are women and adults moves through the colon, the colon absorbs ages 65 and older. Pregnant women may have water from the food while it forms waste constipation, and it is a common problem products, or stool.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of the Gut Microbiome in Children with Functional Constipation
    Reviews The significance of the gut microbiome in children with functional constipation Monika KwiatkowskaA–F, Aneta KrogulskaA–F Department of Pediatrics, Allergology and Gastroenterology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland A – research concept and design; B – collection and/or assembly of data; C – data analysis and interpretation; D – writing the article; E – critical revision of the article; F – final approval of the article Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, ISSN 1899–5276 (print), ISSN 2451–2680 (online) Adv Clin Exp Med. 2021;30(4):471–480 Address for correspondence Abstract Monika Kwiatkowska E-mail: [email protected] Constipation is a widespread problem in pediatric practice, affecting almost 30% of pediatric population. As much as 90–95% of constipation cases have a functional basis, and although the pathogenesis of func- Funding sources None declared tional constipation remains unclear, its etiology is considered to be multifactorial. Its growing prevalence has been attributed to the occurrence of disorders in the homeostasis of gastrointestinal microbiota. In humans, Conflict of interest the best known microbiome is that of the intestines, which has been the subject of a number of studies None declared based on recognition of the 16S rRNA gene sequence. Microbiota are believed to influence the pathogenesis of functional constipation by affecting peristalsis, relationship with diet, and physical activity. The paper evaluates the role of intestinal microbiota in functional constipation and describes its contribution to the onset Received on July 28, 2020 of disease. Determining the importance of the microbiome in the pathogenesis of functional constipation Reviewed on October 12, 2020 Accepted on December 6, 2020 creates hope for the development of new prevention and treatment methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Constipation in Adults Search Date October 2006 Frank Frizelle and Murray Barclay
    Dig . estive system disor Constipation in adults Search date October 2006 Frank Frizelle and Murray Barclay ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Although there are defined criteria for the diagnosis of constipation, in practice, diagnostic criteria are less rigid, and in part depend on the perception of normal bowel habit. Constipation is highly prevalent, with approximately 12 million general practitioner prescriptions for laxatives in England in 2001. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of non-drug interventions, and of other interventions, in adults with idiopathic chronic con- stipation? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and other important databases up to October 2006 (BMJ Clinical evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 42 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: arachis oil, biofeedback, bisacodyl, cascara, docusate, exercise, glycerine suppositories, glycerol, high-fibre diet, increasing fluids, ispaghula husk, lactitol, lactulose, macrogols (polyethylene glycols), magnesium salts, methylcellulose, paraffin, phosphate enemas, seed oils, senna, sodium citrate enemas, sterculia. der QUESTIONS s What are the effects of non-drug interventions in adults with idiopathic chronic constipation?. 3 What are the effects of other treatments in adults with idiopathic chronic constipation?.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison Of
    PGI8 Systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison of linaclotide versus other oral constipation treatments in patients with chronic constipation H Okumura,1 W Tang,2 K Iwasaki,2 S Shoji,1 T Odaka,3 A Nakajima4 1Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan; 2Milliman Inc., Tokyo, Japan; 3Odaka Medical and Gastrointestinal Clinic, Chiba, Japan; 4Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan INTRODUCTION Figure 2. Treatments included in NMA. Figure 3. Risk of bias of included trials. ● Chronic constipation (CC), including functional constipation, irritable bowel CC Naloxegol 12.5Naloxegol mg 5 mg IBS-C syndrome with constipation (IBS-C), and opioid-induced constipation (OIC), Naloxegol 25 mg OIC [12w] [4w] [12w] 1 Naloxegol[4w, 50 12w] mg [12w] [3w, 12w] CC and IBS-C negatively affects patients’ quality of life and has a prevalence rate of [3w, 12w]Alvimopan 0.5 mg [12w] Random sequence generation Alvimopan 1 mg Methylnaltrexone 450 mg 2,3 [4w] Methylnaltrexone 300 mg CC and OIC (selection bias) approximately 14% and 28% worldwide and in Japan, respectively. Methylnaltrexone 150 mg Lactitol[2w] 20 g Naloxone 2.5 mg Lactitol[7d] 10 g Allocation concealment ● The most commonly recommended treatments are polyethylene glycol [3w] Wheat (triticum) 20 g (selection bias) Naloxone 5 mg [4w] (PEG), lubiprostone, linaclotide, prucalopride, lactulose, bisacodyl, and [3w] Naloxone 10 mg Ispaghula 20 g 4 [4w] Blinding of participants and personnel [3w] Ispaghula 10.8 g dietary fibre ; in Japan, magnesium oxide followed by stimulant laxatives Naloxone 20 mg [14d] (performance bias) [3w] 5 Bisacodyl 10 mg are commonly used.
    [Show full text]
  • A 5Ad Dietary Protocol for Functional Bowel Disorders
    nutrients Article A 5Ad Dietary Protocol for Functional Bowel Disorders Fandi Ibrahim * and Philippa Stribling Division of Life Sciences, School of Engineering, Arts, Science and Technology, University of Suffolk, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 3 July 2019; Accepted: 15 August 2019; Published: 17 August 2019 Abstract: Functional bowel disorders (FBDs) affect around 20% of the population worldwide and are associated with reduced quality of life and high healthcare costs. Dietary therapies are frequently implemented to assist with symptom relief in these individuals, however, there are concerns regarding their complexity, restrictiveness, nutritional adequacy, and effectiveness. Thus, to overcome these limitations, a novel approach, the 5Ad Dietary Protocol, was designed and tested for its efficacy in reducing the severity of a range of gastrointestinal symptoms in 22 subjects with FBDs. The protocol was evaluated in a repeated measures MANOVA design (baseline week and intervention week). Measures of stool consistency and frequency were subtyped based on the subject baseline status. Significant improvements were seen in all abdominal symptom measures (p < 0.01). The effect was independent of body mass index (BMI), age, gender, physical activity level, and whether or not the subjects were formally diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) prior to participation. Stool consistency and frequency also improved in the respective contrasting subtypes. The 5Ad Dietary Protocol proved to be a promising universal approach for varying forms and severities of FBDs. The present study paves the way for future research encompassing a longer study duration and the exploration of underlying physiological mechanisms. Keywords: functional bowel disorders; irritable bowel syndrome; dietary therapies; abdominal pain; bloating; constipation; diarrhoea; IBS; 5Ad Dietary Protocol; FODMAPs 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Constipation
    BOTTOM LINE RECOMMENDATIONS: Constipation Th e diagnosis of functional constipation (FC) requires a history of straining or pain with defecation, hard or large stools that may obstruct the toilet, infrequent bowel movements (BMs), retentive behaviors, and/or encopresis. Often, the chief complaint is colicky abdominal pain, which can mimic more sinister diagnoses which are often missed such as appendicitis, intussusception and bowel obstruction.1 » A closely related disorder with similar symptoms is irritable bowel syndrome subtype with predominant constipation (IBS-C). » The prevalence of FC in infants and toddlers is ~20%.2 IBS is also common, found in up to 15% of children.3 DIAGNOSIS The Rome IV Criteria are validated clinical criteria used to diagnose functional gastrointestinal disorders such as FC and IBS-C. The Bristol Stool Chart may help young patients in determining consistency of stool.4 ROME IV CRITERIA FOR FUNCTIONAL CONSTIPATION Infants and Toddlers » Must include one month of at least 2 of the following in infants/toddlers up to 4 years of age: 1. Two or fewer defecations per week 2. History of excessive stool retention 3. History of painful or hard BMs 4. History of large-diameter stools 5. Presence of a large fecal mass in the rectum » In toilet-trained children, the following additional criteria may be used: 6. At least one episode per week of fecal incontinence 7. History of large-diameter stools that may obstruct the toilet Children and Adolescents5 » Must include 2 or more of the following, occurring at least once per week for a minimum of one month with insufficient criteria for a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Evidence for the Role of Linaclotide for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
    Reviews: Clinical Trial Outcomes Clinical evidence for the role of linaclotide for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome Clin. Invest. (2012) 2(10), 1039–1046 Linaclotide is an synthetic peptide that binds to the external domain of enteric JR Malagelada guanylate cyclase C, activating a molecular pathway that increases intestinal Digestive System Research Unit, Autonomous secretion into the lumen and may simultaneously reduce pain sensitivity. University, Barcelona, Spain These pharmacological properties make linaclotide specially well suited for E-mail: [email protected] the management of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) a condition characterized by abdominal pain and decreased bowel movement frequency and/or increased stool consistency. Linaclotide has been evaluated by a series of clinical trials in both, patients with chronic constipation and patients with IBS-C. In both groups, reported trials have shown that this new drug is both efficacious and appears to be quite safe. Thus, linaclotide is an exciting new drug arriving timely to assist clinicians in the management of IBS-C, a benign yet common, and extremely inconvenient symptomatic condition that currently poses a significant therapeutic challenge Keywords: abdominal pain • bloating • constipation • irritable bowel syndrome • linaclotide Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), as we recognize it today, is a clinical entity that was the subject of a structured consensus process initiated at a meeting in Rome approx- imately 20 years ago and refined through a series of subsequent meetings. The out- comes have been published and received Roman numeral indices from Rome I, the first, to Rome IV, the current consensus process due to be reported in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Laxatives and Pharmacological Therapies in Gut: First Published As 10.1136/Gut.2010.227132 on 4 January 2011
    Neurogastroenterology Effect of laxatives and pharmacological therapies in Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.2010.227132 on 4 January 2011. Downloaded from chronic idiopathic constipation: systematic review and meta-analysis Alexander C Ford,1,2 Nicole C Suares1 1Leeds Gastroenterology ABSTRACT Institute, Leeds General Background There has been no definitive systematic Significance of this study Infirmary, Great George Street, review and meta-analysis to date examining the effect of Leeds, UK 2 laxatives and pharmacological therapies in chronic Leeds Institute of Molecular What is already known about this subject? idiopathic constipation (CIC). Medicine, University of Leeds, < Chronic idiopathic constipation is a common Leeds, UK Objective To assess efficacy of these therapies functional disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. systematically in CIC. < The condition is difficult to treat. Correspondence to Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of Dr Alex Ford, Leeds < Evidence for any benefit of laxatives is randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Gastroenterology Institute, conflicting, and there has been no definitive Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Room 230, D Floor, Clarendon summary of the evidence for efficacy of newer Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, central register of controlled trials were searched (up to pharmacological agents. Great George Street, Leeds, September 2010). LS1 3EX, UK; [email protected] Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Placebo- What are the new findings? controlled trials of laxatives or pharmacological therapies < Polyethylene glycol, sodium picosulfate, bisa- Revised 1 October 2010 in adult CIC patients were eligible. Minimum duration of codyl, prucalopride, lubiprostone and linaclotide Accepted 26 October 2010 therapy was 1 week. Trials had to report either were all more effective than placebo for treating a dichotomous assessment of overall response to chronic idiopathic constipation, but data to therapy at last point of follow-up in the trial, or mean support efficacy of lactulose were limited.
    [Show full text]