DOCSLIB.ORG

Pasture, Rangeland and Grazing Management by Lee Rinehart NCAT Agriculture Specialist © 2006 NCAT Updated Nov

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pasture, Rangeland and Grazing Management by Lee Rinehart NCAT Agriculture Specialist © 2006 NCAT Updated Nov Pasture, Rangeland and ATTRA Grazing Management A Publication of ATTRA - National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service • 1-800-346-9140 • www.attra.ncat.org By Lee Rinehart In a time of high-cost inputs, pasture-based livestock production systems can naturally maintain soil NCAT Program and plant integrity while growing healthy ruminants. This publication profiles the general types of Specialist pastures and rangelands and offers information about management and expected yields. Weed man- © 2006 NCAT agement strategies are also discussed and tips are offered to rehabilitate depleted land. Issues in graz- Updated Nov. 2008 ing management, such as paddock development, plant selection, drought and plant toxicosis, are also discussed. Resources and references are also presented. Contents Introduction ........................ 1 Temperate pasture ........... 2 Rangeland ............................ 2 Managing soil and forage resources ................ 3 Intake, sward density and grazing period ........... 5 Legumes and soil fertility ................................... 5 Stocking rate ....................... 5 Ecological weed management in pastures ........................... 6 Multispecies grazing ....... 7 Pasture renovation and establishment ............ 8 Rotational grazing and paddock size ............ 10 Photo by Lee Rinehart, NCAT Overgrazing ...................... 12 Plant species and Sheep on native range in southwestern Montana. systems for extending the grazing season ......... 12 Introduction with the use of high-grain rations. Grain- Prescribed grazing fed ruminants typically require treatment on rangeland .................... 13 Pasture is the basis of any livestock opera- for maladies such as acidosis, mastitis and Developing a grazing tion that purports to be truly sustainable. It respiratory disease due to the fact that their management plan on is especially important as the livestock sec- rangeland ........................... 14 immune systems have been seriously com- tor continues to experience extraordinarily Managing for drought .. 15 promised. A singular focus on productivity high fuel and other input costs. Pasture- Plant toxicity ..................... 16 often causes more problems than a systems based production systems offer farmers and Summary ............................ 18 approach. A well-planned and managed ranchers the ability to let the ruminant’s References ......................... 18 pasture-based operation can maintain rea- environment and immune system work Further Resources .......... 19 sonable production, reduce input costs and together, thereby gaining an acceptable achieve a positive economic return, given a ATTRA—National Sustainable level of production while naturally main- Agriculture Information Service well-conceived marketing plan. is managed by the National Cen- taining the integrity of the ecological con- ter for Appropriate Technology nections between ruminants, the soil and Much of the grazing land in the United (NCAT) and is funded under a grant from the United States the pasture plants. Ruminants on pasture States can be used more efficiently for live- Department of Agriculture’s Rural experience fewer health problems due par- stock grazing. For instance, U.S. Depart- Business-Cooperative Service. Visit the NCAT Web site (www. tially to reduced stress, whereas ruminants ment of Agriculture Agricultural Research ncat.org/sarc_current. that are subjected to confinement have their Service scientists have utilized wheat pas- php) for more informa- tion on our sustainable digestive physiology running at top speed ture and old world bluestem perennial agriculture projects. grass pastures, such as those that occupy the presence of high-yielding plant species large sections in the Southern Great Plains, such as bromegrass and alfalfa. Temperate and stocked them with double the number pastures will on average yield anywhere of cattle they normally would when using from 2,000 pounds of dry matter per acre intensively managed grazing techniques. per year to more than 12,000 pounds per Even on the arid rangelands of the west- acre depending on the species, soil type, ern United States, increased stock density growing season, grazing management and coupled with decreased time on a pasture other environmental factors. has been successful in increasing livestock enterprise productivity while improving the Rangeland condition of the rangeland. According to the Society for Range Man- The ecological processes that occur on tem- agement, rangelands are a type of land on perate pastures and on arid rangelands are which the natural vegetation is dominated basically the same, but occur much slower by grasses, forbs and shrubs and the land on rangelands due mainly to temperature is managed as a natural ecosystem (SRM). and moisture differences. The following In North America, rangelands include the section is an attempt to clarify the nature of grasslands of the Great Plains stretching both types of pasture ecology. from Texas to Canada, from the prairie states of the Dakotas and Nebraska to the annual Temperate pasture grasslands of California and forestlands and wetlands throughout North America. Temperate pastures are typically very Included in this definition are arid shrub- productive. They are characterized by lands throughout the western United States, well-developed soils, medium to high pre- the arctic tundra, and mountain mead- cipitation and moderate to rapid nutri- ows and deserts throughout the Southwest. ent cycling. They can be dominated by Rangeland can also encompass pastures of warm- or cool-season plants and occupy introduced grasses, such as crested wheat- niches from Maine to Florida, from Texas grass, that are managed as rangelands. to Minnesota and from Southern Califor- Arid rangelands, which typify much of Ari- nia to the Pacific Northwest coastal regions zona, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, of Washington and Oregon. Many irrigated Idaho, Montana, Oregon, California and riverine pastures in the desert and Inter- Washington, can yield anywhere from 200 mountain West also resemble temperate Temperate pasture can to 1,500 pounds or more of dry matter per be highly productive pastures due to deep soils, adequate mois- acre per year. with proper grazing ture from irrigation or high water tables and management. Rangelands are typically characterized by low precipitation, shallow soils and slow nutrient cycling. They are usually domi- nated by grasses, forbs and shrubs effi- cient at water and nutrient utilization, so practices that are appropriate to temper- ate pastures, such as fertilization and plow- ing, are often inappropriate on rangelands. Regardless, rangelands can be very produc- tive, providing sustainable income for ranch communities while protecting valuable nat- ural resources through appropriate grazing strategies. Specific strategies for sustainable rangeland management are covered below in the sections Prescribed grazing on rangeland and Developing a grazing Photo courtesy of USDA NRCS. management plan on rangeland. Page 2 ATTRA Pasture, Rangeland, and Grazing Management greater germination of seeds and encouraging regeneration of pasture swards. Rotational grazing is a proven method of increasing the effi- ciency of pasture systems. Intensively managed rota- tional grazing systems have the potential of maintaining pastures in a vegetative state for most of the growing season in many regions of the coun- try. Coupled with the use of Photo courtesy of USDA NRCS. stockpiled pasture and stored forage, the possibility of year- Native rangelands are more fragile than temperate pastures, and often round forage finishing of live- Related ATTRA require different approaches to management for sustainable production. Publications stock becomes more feasible in more parts of the country. Assessing the Pasture Managing soil and In addition, intensively managed grazing Soil Resource forage resources systems make it possible to feed livestock Dairy Resource List: Fertile soil is the foundation of sustain- without concentrating wastes in manure pits Organic and Pasture- able production. Soil macro-organisms and and lagoons, thereby maintaining nutrients Based microorganisms are the external diges- within the pasture ecosystem and preventing Managed Grazing in tive system that processes organic matter, them from becoming pollutants. Riparian Areas delivering a smorgasbord of minerals, vita- An intensively managed pasture system is Multispecies Grazing mins and other nutrients to the crop at a appropriate for maximizing gain per acre metered pace. This contrasts the conven- Nutrient Cycling in and maintaining soil and pasture stand Pastures tional approach of flooding crops with a health. But to take advantage of the ben- limited number of soluble fertilizer nutri- eficial qualities of an intensively managed Pastures: Sustainable ents, leading to luxury consumption, imbal- pasture system, a grazier should pay careful Management anced plant nutrition and a susceptibility to attention to grass stubble height after graz- Pastures: Going disease and attack by insect pests. ing. A grazier should be aware of the direct Organic Pasture systems are maintained through correlation between after-grazing stubble Paddock Design, grazing and animal impact on the land, heights and pasture health. Fencing, and Water which accomplish the following: Livestock should be turned onto cool-sea- Systems for Controlled Grazing • nutrient cycling through feces and son grass pastures such as orchardgrass,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basics of Management - Intensive Grazing Stephen K
    Proceedings of the Integrated Crop Management Proceedings of the 10th Annual Integrated Crop Conference Management Conference Nov 18th, 12:00 AM Basics of Management - Intensive Grazing Stephen K. Barnhart Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/icm Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons Barnhart, Stephen K., "Basics of Management - Intensive Grazing" (1998). Proceedings of the Integrated Crop Management Conference. 28. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/icm/1998/proceedings/28 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences and Symposia at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Integrated Crop Management Conference by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BASICS OF MANAGEMENT -INTENSIVE GRAZING Stephen K. Barnhart Agronomist-Extension Forage Programs Department of Agronomy Iowa State University. What Is Management-Intensive Grazing ? Management-intensive grazing is a method for regulating how often and how much to graze in order to control the quality, yield, consumption, and persistence of forage from pasture. Managed grazing attempts to optimize animal performance or limit intake to a desired level and reduce wasted forage. Depending on the grazing methods used, the amount of fresh pasture provided, the amount of forage eaten, and its quality is regulated by the size of pasture area being grazed, the duration of that grazing, and the amount of the available forage allowed for grazing. Also critical is the period that each pasture is rested between grazings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Career in Rangeland Management
    Who Hires Rangeland Professionals? Federal Agencies: U.S. Forest Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bureau of Land Management, A Career in Agricultural Research Service, National Park Service, Environmental Protection Agency, etc. State Governments: State land agencies, fish and wildlife Rangeland departments, natural resource departments, state cooperative extension, etc. Private Industry: Ranch managers, commercial consulting firms, other commercial companies including mining, agri- Management cultural, real estate, etc. Colleges and Universities: Teaching, research and extension. All photos courtesy of USDA NRCS For More Information The Society for Range Management (SRM) is a professional and scientific organization whose members are concerned with studying, conserving, managing and sustaining the varied resources of rangelands. We invite you to contact us at: Society for Range Management 445 Union Blvd, Suite 230 Lakewood, CO 80228 303-986-3309 www.rangelands.org • [email protected] A Wide Range of Opportunities Society for Range Management 445 Union Blvd., Suite 230 Lakewood, CO 80228 303-986-3309 www.rangelands.org 1000-903-2500 Overview of Rangeland Management Rangeland Management Education Rangeland management is a unique discipline that blends Many colleges and universities offer range science and science and management for the purpose of sustaining this management courses as part of various agriculture or natural valuable land. The primary goal of range management is to resource science degree programs. Schools that offer actual protect and enhance a sustainable ecosystem that provides degrees in range ecology, science or management are shown forage for wildlife and livestock, clean water and recreation in bold type. on public land. In order to achieve these results, professionals Angelo State University may use a variety of techniques such as controlled burning Arizona State University and grazing regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock and Landscapes
    SUSTAINABILITY PATHWAYS LIVESTOCK AND LANDSCAPES SHARE OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION IN GLOBAL LAND SURFACE DID YOU KNOW? Agricultural land used for ENVIRONMENT Twenty-six percent of the Planet’s ice-free land is used for livestock grazing LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION and 33 percent of croplands are used for livestock feed production. Livestock contribute to seven percent of the total greenhouse gas emissions through enteric fermentation and manure. In developed countries, 90 percent of cattle Agricutural land used for belong to six breed and 20 percent of livestock breeds are at risk of extinction. OTHER AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION SOCIAL One billion poor people, mostly pastoralists in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, depend on livestock for food and livelihoods. Globally, livestock provides 25 percent of protein intake and 15 percent of dietary energy. ECONOMY Livestock contributes up to 40 percent of agricultural gross domestic product across a significant portion of South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa but receives just three percent of global agricultural development funding. GOVERNANCE With rising incomes in the developing world, demand for animal products will continue to surge; 74 percent for meat, 58 percent for dairy products and 500 percent for eggs. Meeting increasing demand is a major sustainability challenge. LIVESTOCK AND LANDSCAPES SUSTAINABILITY PATHWAYS WHY DOES LIVESTOCK MATTER FOR SUSTAINABILITY? £ The livestock sector is one of the key drivers of land-use change. Each year, 13 £ As livestock density increases and is in closer confines with wildlife and humans, billion hectares of forest area are lost due to land conversion for agricultural uses there is a growing risk of disease that threatens every single one of us: 66 percent of as pastures or cropland, for both food and livestock feed crop production.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering on Net Zero: Scottish Agriculture
    i Delivering on Net Zero: Scottish Agriculture A report for WWF Scotland from the Organic Policy, Business and Research Consultancy Authors: Nic Lampkin, Laurence Smith, Katrin Padel NOVEMBER 2019 ii Contents Executive summary............................................................................................................................................ iii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Portfolio of mitigation measures ............................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Measuring greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential .............................................. 3 2.3 Emission reduction measures to be analysed ................................................................................... 5 A. Improved nitrogen fertiliser use ............................................................................................................... 5 2.3.1 M1 (E1, FBC): Improving synthetic N utilisation ........................................................................ 5 2.3.2 M2 (E6): Controlled release fertilisers (CRF) ............................................................................. 6 2.3.3 M3 (E10): Precision applications to crops ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hog Pastures and Conservation Compliance
    Illinois Grazing Manual Fact Sheet GRAZING MANAGEMENT Hog Pastures and Conservation Compliance General Information Significant problems exist in meeting conservation compliance requirements for livestock producers. These include high intensity grazing of hogs on forages in rotation with row crops, grazing crop residues, and manure injection of HEL fields. Swine pasture trials have been conducted to learn more about the interrelationships of pasture species selection, seeding rate, stocking density, grass stand (plants per sq. ft.), and per cent ground cover. These trials have networked the experience, knowledge, and skills of pro-active swine producers, the Natural Resources Conservation Service and University of Illinois Extension. Initial trials were seeded in the spring of 1992 utilizing alfalfa and grass mixtures. The grass species included were: 1) Tetraploid perennial ryegrass, 2) Matua Rescuegrass, 3) low endophyte Tall Fescue, and 4) Orchardgrass. These trial plots were intensively grazed and evaluated during 1993 with a mean stocking rate of 11.6 sows and litter per acre. Grass stands and % cover was evaluated throughout the year. Results indicated that tetraploid perennial ryegrass exhibited a very vigorous growth habit and was able to withstand high levels of grazing and trampling. It maintained higher levels of ground cover throughout the season. Tall Fescue established well, exhibited high stand counts, and even with very high grazing intensity was able to maintain over until late in the season. Tall Fescue also reduced the seed cost per acre. The use of alfalfa-orchardgrass under high intensity use, held up through mid-season but declined rapidly to only 20% cover in the fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock Performance for Sheep and Cattle Grazing Lowland Permanent Pasture: Benchmarking Potential of Forage-Based Systems
    agronomy Article Livestock Performance for Sheep and Cattle Grazing Lowland Permanent Pasture: Benchmarking Potential of Forage-Based Systems Robert J. Orr 1, Bruce A. Griffith 1, M. Jordana Rivero 1,* and Michael R. F. Lee 1,2 1 Rothamsted Research, Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK; [email protected] (R.J.O.); bruce.griffi[email protected] (B.A.G.); [email protected] (M.R.F.L.) 2 University of Bristol, Bristol Veterinary School, Langford, Somerset BS40 5DU, UK * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-1837-512302 Received: 29 January 2019; Accepted: 18 February 2019; Published: 21 February 2019 Abstract: Here we describe the livestock performance and baseline productivity over a two-year period, following the establishment of the infrastructure on the North Wyke Farm Platform across its three farmlets (small farms). Lowland permanent pastures were continuously stocked with yearling beef cattle and ewes and their twin lambs for two years in three farmlets. The cattle came into the farmlets as suckler-reared weaned calves at 195 32.6 days old weighing 309 45.0 kg, were ± ± housed indoors for 170 days then turned out to graze weighing 391 54.2 kg for 177 days. Therefore, ± it is suggested for predominantly grass-based systems with minimal supplementary feeding that target live weight gains should be 0.5 kg/day in the first winter, 0.9 kg/day for summer grazing and 0.8 kg/day for cattle housed and finished on silage in a second winter. The sheep performance suggested that lambs weaned at 100 days and weighing 35 kg should finish at 200 days weighing 44 to 45 kg live weight with a killing out percentage of 44%.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Friendly Farming: Seven Agricultural Practices to Sustain People and the Environment Executive Summary
    Future Friendly Farming Seven Agricultural Practices to Sustain People and the Environment Ryan Stockwell and Eliav Bitan August 2011 Future Friendly Farming Seven Agricultural Practices to Sustain People and the Environment Ryan Stockwell and Eliav Bitan August 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank the contributions of many people in the development of this report. Julie Sibbing and Aviva Glaser provided guidance and editing. Bill McGuire provided content and consulted on the development of the report. Mekell Mikell provided insightful edits. A number of reviewers provided helpful feedback on various drafts of this report. We appreciate the time everyone took to talk with us about their practices or projects. Finally we would like to thank the Packard Foundation for their support of this project. Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................................3 CHART: Multiple benefits of agriculture and land management practices ......................................................................4 1. Cover Crops ...........................................................................................5 CASE STUDY: Minnesota Corn and Soybean Farmer Grows Profits, as well as Water Quality and Climate Benefits .........................................................................6 CASE STUDY: Cover Cropping North Dakota Grain and Cattle Farmers Grow Profits, as
    [Show full text]
  • Rangeland Management
    RANGELANDS 17(4), August 1995 127 Changing SocialValues and Images of Public Rangeland Management J.J. Kennedy, B.L. Fox, and T.D. Osen Many political, economiç-and'ocial changes of the last things (biocentric values). These human values are 30 years have affected Ar'ierican views of good public expressed in various ways—such as laws, rangeland use, rangeland and how it should be managed. Underlying all socio-political action, popularity of TV nature programs, this socio-political change s the shift in public land values governmental budgets, coyote jewelry, or environmental of an American industrial na4i hat emerged from WWII to messages on T-shirts. become an urban, postindutr society in the 1970s. Much of the American public hold environmentally-orientedpublic land values today, versus the commodity and community The Origin of Rangeland Social Values economic development orientation of the earlier conserva- We that there are no and tion era (1900—1969). The American public is also mentally propose fixed, unchanging intrinsic or nature values. All nature and visually tied to a wider world through expanded com- rangeland values are human creations—eventhe biocentric belief that nature has munication technology. value independent of our human endorsement or use. Consider golden eagles or vultures as an example. To Managing Rangelands as Evolving Social Value begin with, recognizing a golden eagle or vulture high in flight is learned behavior. It is a socially taught skill (and not Figure 1 presents a simple rangeland value model of four easily mastered)of distinguishingthe cant of wings in soar- interrelated systems: (1) the environmental/natural ing position and pattern of tail or wing feathers.
    [Show full text]
  • Grazing and Browsing Behavior, Grazing Management, Forage Evaluation and Goat Performance: Strategies to Enhance Meat Goat Production in North Carolina
    1 Grazing and Browsing Behavior, Grazing Management, Forage Evaluation and Goat Performance: Strategies to Enhance Meat Goat Production in North Carolina Jean-Marie Luginbuhl, Professor, J. Paul Mueller, Professor and Interim Dean of International Programs, James. T. Green, Jr., Professor Emeritus, Douglas S. Chamblee, Professor Emeritus, and Heather M. Glennon, Meat Goat Program Research Technician and PhD candidate College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University Campus Box 7620, Raleigh NC 27695 ABSTRACT the use of high quality forage and browse and the Goats (Capra hircus hircus) offer an opportunity strategic use of expensive concentrate feeds. This can to more effectively convert pasture nutrients to be achieved by developing a year-round forage animal products as milk, meat and fiber which are program allowing for as much grazing as possible currently marketable and in demand by a growing throughout the year. segment of the US population. With the introduction of the Boer breed and the upgrading of meat-type Some people still believe that goats eat and do goats with Boer genetics, research focusing on well on low quality feed. Attempting to manage and forage evaluation, feeding strategies and the feed goats with such a belief will not lead to development of economical grazing systems was successful meat goat production. On pasture or urgently needed to meet the needs of this emerging rangeland, maximum goat gains or reproduction can industry. The first part of this paper focuses on the be attained by combining access to large quantities of quality forage that allow for selective feeding. description of grazing/browsing behavior of goats and grazing management, and grazing strategies such Goat Brazing/Browsing Behavior as control and strip grazing, differences between Goats are very active foragers, able to cover a control and continuous grazing, forward creep wide area in search of scarce plant materials.
    [Show full text]
  • 1933–1941, a New Deal for Forest Service Research in California
    The Search for Forest Facts: A History of the Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1926–2000 Chapter 4: 1933–1941, A New Deal for Forest Service Research in California By the time President Franklin Delano Roosevelt won his landslide election in 1932, forest research in the United States had grown considerably from the early work of botanical explorers such as Andre Michaux and his classic Flora Boreali- Americana (Michaux 1803), which first revealed the Nation’s wealth and diversity of forest resources in 1803. Exploitation and rapid destruction of forest resources had led to the establishment of a federal Division of Forestry in 1876, and as the number of scientists professionally trained to manage and administer forest land grew in America, it became apparent that our knowledge of forestry was not entirely adequate. So, within 3 years after the reorganization of the Bureau of Forestry into the Forest Service in 1905, a series of experiment stations was estab- lished throughout the country. In 1915, a need for a continuing policy in forest research was recognized by the formation of the Branch of Research (BR) in the Forest Service—an action that paved the way for unified, nationwide attacks on the obvious and the obscure problems of American forestry. This idea developed into A National Program of Forest Research (Clapp 1926) that finally culminated in the McSweeney-McNary Forest Research Act (McSweeney-McNary Act) of 1928, which authorized a series of regional forest experiment stations and the undertaking of research in each of the major fields of forestry. Then on March 4, 1933, President Roosevelt was inaugurated, and during the “first hundred days” of Roosevelt’s administration, Congress passed his New Deal plan, putting the country on a better economic footing during a desperate time in the Nation’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Management and Reports
    2270 Page 1 of 7 FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC FSM 2200 - RANGELAND MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 2270 - INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND REPORTS Amendment No.: 2200-2020-9 Effective Date: Duration: This amendment is effective until superseded or removed. Approved: Date Approved: Associate Deputy Chief Posting Instructions: Amendments are numbered consecutively by title and calendar year. Post by document; remove the entire document and replace it with this amendment. Retain this transmittal as the first page(s) of this document. The last amendment to this title was 2200-2019-6 to 2260. New Document 2270 7 Pages Superseded Document(s) 2270 5 Pages by Issuance Number and (Amendment 2200-2005-06, 07/19/2005) Effective Date 2270 4 Pages (Amendment 2200-2003-1, 01/24/2003) Digest: 2270.4 - Establishes code, caption, and sets forth responsibilities for Director of Forest Management, Rangeland Management, and Vegetation Ecology; /grassland/prairie supervisors. 2271 - Changes caption from “Forest Service Range Information System” to “Reporting Requirements”. Removes obsolete references to Forest Service Range Management Information System (FSRAMIS), as this system is no longer in use, and replaces it with Rangeland Information Management System (RIMS). 2271.04a - 04c - Adds reporting requirement responsibilities for Regional Foresters, Forest/Grassland/Prairie Supervisors, and District Rangers. WO AMENDMENT 2200-2020-9 2270 EFFECTIVE DATE: Page 2 of 7 DURATION: This amendment is effective until superseded or removed. FSM 2200 - RANGELAND MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 2270 - INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND REPORTS Digest--Continued: 2271.1 - Changes caption from “Forest Service Rangeland Management Information System Applications” to “Forest Service Rangeland Management Automated Systems” and sets forth direction, and expands discussion of system application responsibilities for all four organizational levels.
    [Show full text]
  • About Holistic Planned Grazing
    What Is Holistic Planned Grazing? Holistic Planned Grazing is a planning process for dealing simply with the great complexity livestock managers face daily in integrating livestock production with crop, wildlife and forest production while working to ensure continued land regeneration, animal health and welfare, and profitability. Holistic Planned Grazing helps ensure that livestock are in the right place, at the right time, and with the right behavior. It is based on a military planning procedure developed over hundreds of years to enable the human mind to handle many variables in a constantly changing, and often stressful, environment. The technique reduces incredible complexity step-by-step to absolute simplicity. It allows managers to focus on the necessary details, one at a time, without losing sight of the whole and what they hope to achieve. Traditional goals of producing meat, milk or fiber generally become a by-product of more primary purposes – creating a landscape and harvesting sunlight. In the process of creating a landscape, livestock managers also plan for the needs of wildlife, crops, and other uses, as well as the potential fire or drought. To harvest the maximum amount of sunlight, they strive through the planning to decrease the amount of bare ground and increase the mass of plants. They time livestock production cycles to the cycles of nature, market demands, and their own abilities. If profit from livestock is important, they factor that in too. At times they may favor the needs of the livestock, at other times the needs of wildlife or the needs of plants. Because so many factors are involved, and because they are always changing it is easy to be swayed by those who say we can ignore all the variables: managers will do all right if they just watch the animals and the grass, or if they just keep their animals bunched and rotating.
    [Show full text]