Arxiv:Hep-Ex/0602021V1 9 Feb 2006 N 4TV Ftetotal the of Tev) 14 and Aiiycvrg Pt H Eyfradrgo.Ti Is This High- Region

View metadata,citationandsimilarpapersatcore.ac.uk arXiv:hep-ex/0602021v1 9 Feb 2006 n 4TV ftetotal the of TeV) 14 and aiiycvrg pt h eyfradrgo.Ti is This high- region. of forward detection good the very a for the of needed requirement to also the up to coverage leads rapidity – the between protons singlets rapidity colour interacting products’ of main exchange scattering to The the due in distribution understood. gaps not structure large proton still – to signature are ties QCD close low-energy with and processes these of tails tteTvto n h LHC Deile the M. and Tevatron the at Cross-Section Total and Diffraction .Calicchio M. .Kalliopuska J. .EräluotoM. .Latino G. .Minutoli S. .Oriunno M. .Ropelewski L. .Sette G. .Verdier A. 12 11 10 etasgicn rcin(4%a both at repre- % (44 left) fraction 1, significant Fig. (see a scattering sent diffractive and Elastic Introduction 1 13 wl eisre yteeditor) the by inserted be (will No. manuscript EPJ 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 9 esniIsiueo hsc n nvriyo esni F Helsinki, of University and Physics of Institute Helsinki Genève, Switzerland CERN, cdm fSine fteCehRpbi n nttt fPh of Institute and Republic Czech the of Sciences of Academy France Annecy, LAPP UK Uxbridge, Italy University, Genova, Brunel INFN, Sezione Italy and Bari, Italy Genova Università Bari, INFN-Pisa, di di Sezione Politecnico and and Siena Università Bari di di Sezione INFN aeWsenRsreUiest,Dp.o hsc,Clevela Physics, of Dept. University, Reserve Western Case USA Hawaii, of USA University SLAC, Consortium, Biology Poland Molecular Plock, Technology, of University Warsaw enSaeUiest,Dp.o hsc,Uiest ak P Park, University Physics, of Dept. University, State Penn 5 1 .Smotlacha J. , .Anelli G. , uvvladecuiecnrlpouto yDul Pomero Double by cross-sec production central differential exclusive diffractive int and the soft survival of of prog sides both studies diffractive on detailed their spectrometers Pot out Roman and carry coverage ra will with stu partly experiments of Pots, CMS/TOTEM Roman range by vast tagging antiproton a with performed partly also have experiments Tevatron method luminosity-independent the experiments, Tevatron orsleteabgiyb esrn h total the measuring by ambiguity disagre the TeV 1.8 resolve energies. at higher to results to two extrapolations into The uncertainties TeV. 1.8 big at E710/E811 by and Abstract. date version: Revised / date Received: 4 1 .Lauhakangas R. , 5 .Watts S. , 1 .Morelli A. , 2 3 K. , .Ferro F. , .Capurro F. , 1 2 .Ruggiero G. , .Kaˇspar J. , Osterberg ¨ tteTvto,tetotal the Tevatron, the At 1 6 .Aurola A. , n .Whitmore J. and , 5 5 8 .Giachero A. , .Musico P. , pp .Snoeys W. , 8 5 2 .Kempa J. , ..Catanesi M.G. , or R.Paoletti , 2 1 .Lippmaa J. , .Saarikko H. , p p ¯ 2 rs-eto.Mn de- Many cross-section. .Avati V. , 5 .Negri M. , p 1 5 T .Taylor C. , 9 ..Guillaud J.P. , .Kenney C. , 4 atce n jets and particles .Parker S. , 13 2 √ 2 .Lokaj´ıˇcek M. , 3 p G.Sanguinetti , s 1 M.A.Ciocci , p ¯ .Berardi V. , 1 = rs-eto a enmaue yCFa 4 e n . TeV, 1.8 and GeV 546 at CDF by measured been has cross-section 5 .Niewiadomski H. , 12 . TeV 8 .Toppinen A. , 11 10 .L Perrot A.-L. , .Kok A. , 7 pp .Hasi J. , inland rs-eto ihapeiino bu .Lk tthe at Like %. 1 about of precision a with cross-section 4 d H USA OH, nd, ,USA A, 3 8 .Cuneo S. , U.Bottigli , .LoVetere M. , 4 esrmn ftettleatcadieatcrtsadthe and rates the inelastic requires and which elastic total Theorem the Optical of measurement the on based cro section total the of determination luminosity-independent the away far detectors Pot point. Roman interaction in the detected from angles be scattering small can very which at protons sur exhibits (“leading”) events viving diffractive of par- fraction “Pomeron” big (a.k.a. hard A singlet the exchanged. colour with about the information of those structure convey partonic i.e. which – – subprocesses events tonic diffractive hard from tteLC h OE olbrto spreparing is collaboration TOTEM the LHC, the At .Santroni A. , in,dffatv tutr ucin,rpdt gap rapidity functions, structure diffractive tions, sc,Paa zc Republic Czech Praha, ysics, 6 nte ups fhg-oeaedtco ytm is systems detector high-coverage of purpose Another .Kundrát V. , 6 ae nteOtclTermwl eue.The used. be will Theorem Optical the on based .Haug F. , Exchange. n iiygptgig tteLC h combined the LHC, the At tagging. gap pidity 2 1 N.Turini , isaotsf n addffatv events, diffractive hard and soft about dies .Noschis E. , 1 rcinpit h hsc eucomprises menu physics The point. eraction .Radermacher E. , 5 y26sadr eitos introducing deviations, standard 2.6 by e am iha nrcdne rapidity unprecedented an with ramme .D Vià Da C. , 4 .Bozzo M. , 5 5 .Macina D. , 1 .Saramad S. , .Heino J. , 8 4 .Kurvinen K. , .VnRemortel Van N. , 1 .Ojala J. , 6 5 .Dimovasili E. , .Brücken E. , 2 1 1 .Hilden T. , .Radicioni E. , .Macr´ı M. , 1 .Sauli F. , 2 .Oljemark F. , 2 .Lami S. , 2 2 provided byHelsinginyliopistondigitaalinenarkisto .Verardo L. , .Buzzo A. , 2 5 1 1 .Jarron P. , .Meucci M. , A.Scribano , .Eggert K. , 3 .Robutti E. , 4 .Lämsä J. , 2 .Orava R. , 5 brought toyouby , 1 5 1 , , 4 , 4 , , 2 5 , , 2 ss- ) - , CORE 2 M. Deile et al.: Diffraction and Total Cross-Section at the Tevatron and the LHC

σ Φ (1.8 TeV) (14 TeV) p p 18 mb ~30 mb Elastic Scattering IP p p η

p p Single Diffraction IP 9.4 mb ~10 mb (SD) p M η TOTEM(+CMS) Diffractive Running Scenarios Φ (k: number of bunches) p ∆η (N: number of protons per bunch) 6.3 mb ~7 mb ∗ 11 −2 −1 Double Diffraction IP (for ∆η > 3) Scen. β [m] k N/10 [cm s ] p L 28 1 1540 43 0.3 1.6 10 (DD) η 2 1540 156 0.6 1.15 2.4 × 1029 ÷ × 32 Φ 3 18 2808 1.15 3.6 10 Double p p × 31 IP 4 90 936 1.15 2 10 Pomeron ? ~1 mb × 33 M 5 0.5 2808 0.3 10 Exchange IP p p 1 low t elastic, σT , min. bias, soft diffract. (DPE) η 2 diffraction| | 3 large t elastic Φ | | p p 4 hard diffraction, large t elastic IP 1.5 mb ? | | Single + Double 0 (under study [17]) M1 (for ∆η > 3) Diffraction IP 5 rare diffractive processes, for later (SDD) p η M2

Φ Multi p IP ? ? Pomeron IP Exchange IP p η

Fig. 1. Left: diffractive process classes and their cross-sections at Tevatron and LHC. Right: running scenarios for diffractive physics at LHC; for more details see [8]. extrapolation of the nuclear elastic scattering cross-section 2 Elastic pp and p¯p Scattering dσ/dt to zero momentum transfer, t = 0, as explained in Section 3. The elastic scattering cross-section dσ/dt is characterised The Tevatron experiments CDF [2], E710 [3] and its by several t-regions with different behaviour (see Fig. 2): very similar successor E811 [4] had Roman Pots on both – The Coulomb region where elastic scattering is domi- sides of the interaction points for detecting elastically scat- nated by photon exchange; this region lies at t < 1.2 | | × tered protons. For diffractive physics, only the antiproton 10−3 GeV2 for √s=546 GeV, t < 0.9 10−3 GeV2 for | | × side had enough dispersion for measuring leading particle √s=1.8 TeV, and t < 6.5 10−4 GeV2 for √s=14 TeV. momenta with Roman Pot spectrometers. The rapidity – The nuclear/Coulomb| | interference× region, where the coverage for measuring the inelastic rate ranged from 5.2 cross-section is given by to 6.5 at E710/811 and from 3.2 to 6.7 at CDF. For tagging diffractive events by their rapidity gaps, additional dσel −iαφ(t) 2 central detectors were available extending the coverage to = π fC e + fN dt (3.8 6.5) for E710 and 0 ( 5.9) (7.5) for CDF in Run | | ± ÷ ÷ ± 2αG2(t) σ 2 I (Run II). = π e−iαφ(t) + tot i + ρ e−B|t|/2 . (1) − t 4π | | At DØ, a double-arm Roman Pot spectrometer (FPD) | | was installed for Run II [5], allowing to measure elastic Here, G(t) is the electromagnetic form factor of the and diffractive processes with (anti-) proton acceptance on both sides of the interaction point. In Run I, rapidity proton, ρ the ratio between real and imaginary part of the forward nuclear elastic amplitude, gap tagging was possible for η < 5.9. | | The TOTEM experiment [1] at the LHC will have Ro- [f (0)] ρ = R el , (2) man Pot stations at 147m and at 220m from the inter- [fel(0)] action point, on both sides. The inelastic event rate will I be measured in a rapidity interval from 3.1 to 6.5. For and φ is the relative phase between the nuclear and diffractive physics, TOTEM will collaborate with CMS, Coulomb amplitudes. E710 and E811 [3,4] have mea- resulting in a rapidity coverage from 0 to 6.5. sured ρ and B in this region (see Table 1), using the ± M. Deile et al.: Diffraction and Total Cross-Section at the Tevatron and the LHC 3

10 2 Events / GeV² × day

10 Coulomb − nuclear interference 8 pp at 14 TeV 10 1 (BSW model) −1 7 10 Pomeron exchange ~ e −B |t| 10 −2 10 6 10 −3 10 diffractive structure 5 9 −4 10 10 10 σ −5 d /dt [mb / GeV²] 4 8 10 10 10 −6 10 7 10 −7 10 6 −8 10 10 E710/811, −9 CDF 5 10 UA4, CDF −8 10 −10 pQCD ~ |t| 10 4 −11 10 10 UA4 −12 3 10 10 −13 Block model (1) 2 10 β∗= (3) 10 −14 1540 m 10 β∗= 18 m −15 10 10 (1) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 (3) −t [GeV²]

Fig. 2. Left: elastic pp¯ scattering from ISR to Tevatron (taken from [7]); right: prediction for elastic pp scattering at LHC; the one-day statistics on the right-hand scales correspond to the running scenarios 1 and 3 (deﬁned in Fig. 1).

West-Yennie parameterisation for φ(t) [6]. The inter- either by approaching the beam closer with the Roman est of ρ lies in its predictive power for σtot at higher Pot or by operating the LHC at √s 6TeV (see Fig. 4 energies via the dispersion relation in [8]). ≤ π dσ ρ(s)= tot (3) 2σtot(s) d ln s 3 Total pp and p¯p Cross-Section – The “single-Pomeron exchange” region with a cross- section dσ/dt e−B |t|. The parameter B was mea- The total pp or p¯p cross-section is related to nuclear elas- sured by several∝ Tevatron experiments (Table 1). tic forward scattering via the Optical Theorem which can – A region with diffractive minima which move to lower be expressed as t as the energy increases (Fig. 2, left). – | | 16π dNel The triple-gluon exchange region at high t described σ2 = . (4) by perturbative QCD and showing a cross-section| | pro- L tot 1+ ρ2 · dt t=0 portional to t −8. | | With the additional relation σ = N + N (5) Table 1. Elastic scattering at the Tevatron [3,4,2,7] L tot el inel √s Exp. t-range [GeV2] B[GeV−2], ρ one obtains a system of 2 equations which can be resolved 546 GeV CDF 0.025 0.08 B = 15.28 0.58 for σtot or independently of each other: 1.8 TeV CDF 0.04 ÷0.29 B = 16.98 ± 0.25 L ÷ ± E710 0.034 0.65 B = 16.3 0.3 16π dNel/dt t=0 ÷ ± σ = , (6) 0.001 0.14 B = 16.99 0.25 tot 2 | ÷ ± 1+ ρ · Nel + Ninel ρ = 0.140 0.069 2 2 ± 1+ ρ (Nel + Ninel) E811 0.002 0.035 using B CDF,E710 ÷ h i = (7) ρ = 0.132 0.056 L 16π · dNel/dt t=0 | 1.96 TeV DØ 0.9 1.35 – ± ÷ Hence the quantities to be measured are: – the nuclear part of the elastic cross-section extrapo- The TOTEM experiment at LHC will cover the t - lated to t = 0; range from 2 10−3 GeV2 to 8 GeV2 (Fig. 2, right) with| | – the total elastic and inelastic rate, the latter consist- two running scenarios× with special beam optics and dif- ing of diffractive (18 mb at LHC) and minimum bias ferent luminosities (scenarios 1 and 3 (or 4) in Fig. 1, (65 mb at LHC) events. right). For details of the t-acceptances of the scenarios see Ref. [8]. The minimum t -value corresponds to a distance The ρ parameter has to be taken from external knowl- | | of 1.3mm = 10 σbeam + 0.5 mm between the Roman Pot edge unless it can be measured from elastic scattering in at 220 m and the beam centre. Reaching the Coulomb- the interference region between nuclear and Coulomb scat- nuclear interference region to measure ρ will be attempted tering. CDF have measured σtot at 546GeV and 1.8TeV 4 M. Deile et al.: Diffraction and Total Cross-Section at the Tevatron and the LHC

The ATLAS collaboration proposes [11] to extract the four 120

[mb] parameters σ , ρ, B and from a ﬁt to (1) and using best fit with stat. error band tot L pp incl. both TEVATRON points dN/dt = dσ/dt. The main diﬃculties of this approach

σ total error band of best fit L −4 2 100 lie in reaching low enough t-values ( t< 6 10 GeV ) total error band from all models and in the uncertainty of the phase −φ. × considered 80 Cosmic Rays 4 Diﬀraction

60 At Tevatron, a vast number of studies on soft and hard

ISR diffraction has been carried out (see Table 3 for a brief overview). 40 UA5 LHC error E811, CDF CDF, UA4 2 3 4 10 10 10 Table 3. The diffractive programmes of the Tevatron exper- s [GeV] iments, the methods for tagging diffractive events, and the coverage in kinematic variables (t is given in units of GeV2) Fig. 3. COMPETE fits [10] to all available pp and pp¯ scattering The abreviations for the diffractive event classes are defined in data with statistical (blue solid) and total (green dashed) error Fig. 1 (left). bands, the latter taking into account the Tevatron ambiguity. The outermost curves (dotted) give the total error band from Exp., Run Tagging Coverage Physics all parameterisations considered. E710 rap. gap 3.8 < η < 6.5 [3] leading ¯p 0.05 <| | t< 0.11 soft SD − ξ < 0.01 using Eqn. (6) with ρ =0.15 [2] (see Table 2). Their mea- CDF I,0 rap. gap η < 6.7 | | surement at 546 GeV agrees with the value from UA4 [9]. [2] leading ¯p t< 0.4 soft SD − E710 and E811 have determined ρ and σtot simultaneously ξ < 0.2 at 1.8 TeV [3,4] by combining Eqns. (4) and (5) with (1). CDF IA,B rap. gap η < 5.9 soft SD, DD, | | DPE, SDD Their result for σtot differs from CDF’s number by 2.6 [12] no RP standard deviations. The origin of the discrepancy is un- CDF IC rap. gap η < 5.9 hard diffract.: | | ¯ known. [13] leading ¯p t< 1 )dijets, W, bb, 0−.03 <ξ< 0.1 J/Ψ CDF II rap. gap η < 7.5 diffr. struct. Table 2. Measurements of the total pp or pp¯ cross-section for | | [14] leading ¯p t< 2 funct., search √s 546 GeV and expectations for the LHC. − ≥ 0.02 <ξ< 0.1 for excl. DPE √s Experiment σtot [mb] DØ I rap. gap η < 5.9 hard diffr.: | | 546 GeV UA4 61.9 1.5 [15] no RP dijets, W, Z ± CDF 61.26 0.93 DØ II rap. gap η < 5.9 ± all above with 1.8 TeV CDF 80.03 2.24 [7] lead. p, ¯p 0| .8| < t< 2 ± − p, ¯ptagging E710 72.8 3.1 any ξ E811 71.42± 2.41 ± +4.1 14 TeV (extrapolation [10] to LHC) 111.5 1.2−2.1 TOTEM ? ±1 In Run I, diffractive events were tagged by their ra- ± pidity gaps and – in some cases – by a leading antiproton. Leading diffractive protons were not detected. For TOTEM will follow the same method as CDF. The the ongoing Run II on the other hand, DØ has installed a total expected uncertainty of 1 % after 1 day of taking double-arm proton- and antiproton spectrometer. data at = 1.6 1028 cm−2 s−1 will have the following At TOTEM/CMS, for all diffractive processes (except contributionsL (combined× in quadrature): DD) leading proton tagging is foreseen with the possibility of using rapidity gaps for redundancy. With scenarios 1 – The statistical errors of Nel + Ninel and dNel/dt t=0 are negligible: 0.01 % and 0.07 % respectively. | and 2, used for soft and semi-hard diffraction, protons of – The systematic error of the total rate stems primarily all ξ will be detected; the total acceptance integrated over t and ξ is 95 %; the resolution in ξ is about 5 10−3. Hard from trigger losses and amounts to 0.8 %. × – The systematic error of the extrapolation of the elas- diffraction with its much smaller cross-sections (e.g. 1 µb tic cross-section to t = 0 is dominated by the theo- for SD dijets at √s = 14 TeV) will be studied with scenario retical uncertainty of the functional form (0.5 %). The 4 where the total proton acceptance is about 65 %, and the ξ resolution is about 4 10−4. next-to-leading contributions come from beam energy, × alignment and crossing-angle uncertainties (each typi- cally 0.1 %). 4.1 Soft Diffraction – If ρ cannot be measured, the uncertainty in its pre- +0.0058 diction (e.g. ρ =0.1361 0.0015−0.0025 [10]) will con- At Tevatron, the total and differential soft diffractive cross- tribute another 0.2 %. ± sections have been measured for the processes of SD (E710, M. Deile et al.: Diffraction and Total Cross-Section at the Tevatron and the LHC 5

CDF), DD and SDD (CDF), see Fig. 1. A central result of paring for different partonic subprocesses the fractions of these cross-section studies is that the t and ξ dependences events showing rapidity gaps (Table 4). They are all of the of the differential cross-sections conform to the predictions order 1 %. The variations are due to different sensitivities of Regge Theory, but that the total normalisations mea- to the gluon and quark components of the Pomeron and sured are suppressed, as also observed in hard diffraction led to the determination of the gluon fraction f =0.59 g ± (see below). With increasing √s this suppression becomes 0.14 0.06 in agreement with HERA’s fg =0.75 0.15. more pronounced. The behaviour of the diffractive cross- ± ± sections at energies above 1.8 TeV is controversial between different models predicting it either to increase further or Table 4. Ratio R between the diffractive subsample (with to remain constant [16]. From the ratios between σdiff , rapidity gap) and all events for a given hard subprocess (j = σelast and σtot, information about opacity and size of the jet, G = gap). √s = 1.8 TeV. proton can be deduced. Process Cuts R [%] Exp. In DPE, CDF’s one-armed antiproton spectrometer E > 20 GeV, T 0.75 0.10 CDF tagged the slightly wider “inclusive” event class ¯pp η > 1.8 → SD:j+j+G j ± ¯p+ X + Y where the proton is allowed to dissociate into ET > 12 GeV, 2 2 0.65 0.04 DØ a low-mass system Y with mY 8 GeV . In the central ηj > 1.6 ± ≤ 2 | | diffractive system, masses up to a few 10 GeV were seen. E > 20 GeV, T 1.13 0.16 CDF At LHC, diffractive masses up to about 1.4 TeV will be η > 1.8 DD:j+G+j j ± observable with sufficient statistics. Surviving protons will E| | > 30 GeV, T 0.94 0.13 DØ be detected on both sides of the IP. ηj > 1.6, ∆ηj > 4 ± | | SD: W + G E/,ET T e > 20 GeV 1.15 0.55 CDF +0±.20 e ν + G E/,ET T e > 25 GeV 0.89− DØ → 0.19 4.2 Hard Diffraction SD: Z + G +0 62 E > 25 GeV 1.44 . DØ ee+G T e −0.54 A central result in diffraction at Tevatron is the breaking SD:→ b + G pT e > 9.5 GeV, 0.62 0.25 CDF of QCD factorisation, i.e. of the hypothesis that the cross- eX+G ηe < 1.1 ± → | | sections of hard diffractive processes can be written as a SD: J/Ψ + G pT µ > 2 GeV, + − 1.45 0.25 CDF convolution µ µ + G ηµ < 0.6 ± → | | 2 2 D 2 σ = dβ dQ dξ dt σˆ(β,Q ,ξ,t) F2 (β,Q ,ξ,t) (8) A possible explanation lies in the different initial states Z in DDIS and in proton-antiproton diffraction. In the lat- of a parton-level cross-sectionσ ˆ and a process-independent ter case, additional soft scattering between the two initial D D diffractive structure function F2 . Comparing F2 from hadrons can fill the rapidity gap and thus destroy the sig- dijet production in diffractive deep inelastic scattering nature used for identifying diffractive events. Hence the (DDIS) at HERA with the result from single diffractive cross-section in Eqn. (8) needs the “gap survival probabil- dijet production at Tevatron yields a suppression of the ity” S 2 as another convolution factor. S 2 was observed latter by roughly a factor 10 (Fig. 4). by CDF| | to decrease by a factor 1.3 2.4| from| 630GeV to 1.8TeV and is expected to be further÷ reduced at LHC energies. The measurement of gap probabilities at the LHC will be an important input for the study of exclusive production processes discussed in the next section. At LHC, additional hard phenomena offering insight into proton structure are being explored, like exclusive SD into three jets, pp p + jjj, which would indicate a minimal Fock space parton→ configuration qqq in the proton [18]. For a jet threshold of 10GeV, a cross-section| i between 0.04 and 0.4 nb is predicted, yielding 80 to 800 events per day at =2 1031 cm−2s−1 (scenario 4). L ×

4.3 Exclusive Production by DPE

A particularly interesting subclass of DPE events is exclusive central production, characterised by only one single Fig. 4. Diffractive structure function for dijet production in jet 2 particle or a dijet in the diffractive system. The vacuum DDIS at H1 and in SD at CDF. The mean (ET ) at CDF corresponds approximately to Q2 at H1. quantum numbers of the two colliding colour singlets lead to selection rules on spin J, parity P and charge conjuga- tion C [19]: This suppression of the diffractive cross-section is in- P + + + dependent of the hard subprocess, as can be seen by com- J =0 , 2 , 4 ; Jz = 0; C = +1 (9) 6 M. Deile et al.: Diffraction and Total Cross-Section at the Tevatron and the LHC

(in the limit of t = 0). The Jz = 0 rule strongly suppresses particularly in the region of mA 130GeV where all three gg q¯qbackground because of helicity conservation (this neutral Higgs bosons have very≈ similar masses. background→ would totally vanish for massless quarks). The rules can also be used for determining the quantum numbers of a new state observed. Table 5 lists some exam- References ples for exclusive production. For exclusive dijet and χc0 production, CDF has seen event candidates and set up- 1. TOTEM: Technical Design Report, CERN-LHCC-2004- per limits on the cross-section. At LHC, these processes 002; addendum CERN-LHCC-2004-020. should be well within reach using scenario 4. The observ- 2. CDF Collaboration (F. Abe et al.), Phys. Rev. D 50, (1994) ability of the χb0 is doubtful because the branching ratio 5518; Phys. Rev. D 50, (1994) 5535; Phys. Rev. D 50, (1994) for its muonic decay is unknown (upper limit: 10−3). 5550; 3. E710 Collaboration (N.A. Amos et al.), PRL 61, (1988) Table 5. Examples of exclusive DPE processes (p + p p + 525; PRL 63, (1989) 2784; Phys. Lett. B 243, (1990) 158; X + p). For cross-sections see e.g. [20]. The numbers in→ square Phys. Lett. B 247, (1990) 127; PRL 68, (1992) 2433; Phys. brackets are experimental upper limits from CDF, Run II [14]. Lett. B 301, (1993) 313. 4. E811 Collaboration (C. Avila et al.), Phys. Lett. B 445, Diffractive Decay channel σ(Tev.) BR σ(LHC) BR × × (1999) 419; Phys. Lett. B 537, (2002) 41. system 5. D0 Collaboration (A. Brandt et al.), A Forward Proton De- dijet 0.97 nb 7 nb jj tector at D0, FERMILAB-PUB-97-377, 1997. (ET > 10 GeV) [ 1.1 nb] + − ≤ 6. G.B. West and D.R. Yennie, Phys. Rev.172, (1968) 1413. χc0 γJ/ψ γµ µ 390 pb 1.8 nb → 1 7. T. Edwards et al., Elastic and Diffractive Scattering at D0, (3.4 GeV) [ 204 pb] − − π+π K+K ≤12 nb 54 nb Proc. of the XII International Workshop on Deep Inelastic χ 0 − Scattering, IEP SAS Koˇsice 2004, pp. 466-471. b γY γµ+µ 0.5 pb 4pb (9.9 GeV) → ≤ ≤ 8. M. Deile et al., The First Year at LHC: Diffractive Physics; 1 scaled from CDF’s rapidity range 0.6 to 2.5 used by KMRS [20]. hep-ex/0503042; submitted to Czech.J.Phys. ± ± 9. UA4 Collaboration (M. Bozzo et al.), Phys. Lett. 147B (1984) 392. 10. J.R. Cudell et al.; Benchmarks for the Forward Observ- Table 6. Cross-sections for exclusive Higgs production in the ables at RHIC, the Tevatron-Run II, and the LHC; PRL 89, SM and the MSSM (examples) [21]. A mass resolution σ(M)= (2002) 201801. 3 GeV from the Roman Pot spectrometer is assumed. 11. ATLAS Forward Detectors for Luminosity Measurement SM, mH = 120 GeV and Monitoring, Letter of Intent, CERN/LHCC/2004-010. − σ BR(H bb)¯ 2 fb (S/B @ 30 fb 1 = 11/10) 12. CDF Collaboration (F. Abe et al.), PRL 74, (1995) 855; × → ∗ −1 σ BR(H WW ) 0.4 fb (S/B @ 30 fb = 8/3) PRL 78, (1997) 2698; PRL 79, (1997) 2636; PRL 80, (1998) × → MSSM, tan β = 30 tan β = 50 1156; PRL 81, (1998) 5278; (T. Affolder et al.), PRL 84, mA = 130 GeV mh = 122.7 GeV mh = 124.4 GeV (2000) 232; PRL 87, (2001) 241802; mH = 134.2 GeV mH = 133.5 GeV 13. CDF Collaboration (T. Affolder et al.), PRL 84, (2000) ¯ σ BR(A bb) 0.07 fb 0.2 fb 5043; PRL 85, (2000) 4215; PRL 87, (2001) 141802; PRL × → ¯ σ BR(h bb) 5.6 fb 13 fb 88, (2002) 151802; PRL 91, (2003) 011802; PRL 93, (2004) σ × BR(H→ bb)¯ 8.7 fb 23 fb × → 141601. MSSM, tan β = 30 tan β = 50 14. For Run II see e.g. K. Terashi on behalf of the CDF Collab- m = 100 GeV m = 98 GeV m = 99 GeV A h h oration, Diffractive Measurements at CDF, Proc. of the XII mH = 133 GeV mH = 131 GeV σ BR(A bb)¯ 0.4 fb 1.1 fb International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering, IEP σ × BR(h →bb)¯ 70 fb 200 fb SAS Koˇsice 2004, pp. 546-553. σ × BR(H→ bb)¯ 8 fb 15 fb 15. D0 Collaboration (S. Abachi et al.), PRL 72, (1994) 2332; × → PRL 76, (1996) 734; Phys. Lett. B 440, (1998) 189; Phys. Lett. B 531, (2002) 52; Phys. Lett. B 574, (2003) 169; At a later stage it might even be possible for TOTEM 16. K. Goulianos, Phys. Lett. B 358, (1995) 379; S. Sapeta +CMS to observe exclusive production of the Higgs boson. and K. Golec-Biernat, Phys. Lett. B 613, (2005) 154. However, the low cross-section requires running at 17. K. Eggert et al., TOTEM physics, proceedings from the 33 −2 −1 L ∼ 10 cm s , i.e. with scenario 5 whose optics are such XIth International Conference on Elastic and Diffractive that additional Roman Pots in the cryogenic LHC region Scattering, Blois 2005. at 420 m from the IP would be needed for sufficient leading 18. L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, Surveys High Energ.Phys. 14 proton acceptance. Still, the diffractive production rate of (1999) 9-27; A. Ageev et al. (FELIX Collaboration), J. Phys. a Standard Model Higgs is very low, as is the signal-to- G 28, (2002) R117. background ratio for the dominant decay channel H bb¯ 19. V.A. Khoze, A.D. Martin, M.G. Ryskin, Eur. Phys. J. C19 (see Table 6, top block). More favourable is the MSSM→ (2001) 477. case, particularly for large tan β and low mA (Table 6, 20. V.A. Khoze et al., Eur. Phys. J. C23 (2002) 311.; Eur. middle and bottom blocks). Due to the selection rules (9), Phys. J. C35 (2004) 211-220. V.A. Petrov, R.A. Ryutin, exclusive production of the CP-odd A is suppressed, giving JHEP 0408 (2004) 013. the opportunity to separate it from the CP-even h and 21. A.B. Kaidalov et al., Eur. Phys. J. C33, (2004) 261. H, which is difficult for conventional inclusive production,