DOCSLIB.ORG

Mining Proposal for Proposed Extension of Beverley Mine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mining Proposal for Proposed Extension of Beverley Mine Mining Proposal for Proposed Extension of Beverley Mine Mine owner Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd Mine operator Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd Contact person Richard Phillips – Managing Director, Operations Contact details Level 9, 45 Grenfell Street, Adelaide SA 5000 Telephone: 08 8110 0500 Fax: 08 8212 5559 Email: [email protected] Tenement details MC 3679-3739 inclusive incorporating ML 6036 and MPL 57, 58 and 59 Name of mining Beverley Mine operation Commodity to be Uranium mined MLA application 23 November 2006 date Prepared for: Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd Level 9 45 Grenfell Street Adelaide SA 5000 21 December 2007 42213777 J:\J obs \42213777\R eporti ng\Final D ecember 07\Fi nal Report\H eathg ate Mini ng Pr opos al 20071221 F INA L. doc Mining Pr opos al for Proposed E xt ension of Beverl ey Mine MINING PROPOSAL FOR PROPOSED EXTENSION OF BEVERLEY MINE Project Manager: URS Australia Pty Ltd Level 4 …………………………… 70 Light Square Tim Jarvis Adelaide SA 5000 Associate Scientist Tel: 61 8 8366 1000 Project Director: Fax: 61 8 8366 1001 …………………………… Vic Farrington Senior Principal Environmental Engineer Prepared for Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd, 23 November 2007 MINING PROPOSAL FOR PROPOSED EXTENSION OF BEVERLEY MINE Contents Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 A General Description of the Project or Mine ........................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background to the Proposal....................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Summary of the Land and Environment Description............................................... 1-1 1.4 Summary of Existing Operations ............................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Summary of Proposed Operations ............................................................................ 1-5 1.6 Key Environment Impacts and Management Strategies.......................................... 1-5 1.7 Updated Baseline Studies........................................................................................... 1-7 1.8 Proposed Post Mine Land Use ................................................................................... 1-7 1.9 Mine Closure and Rehabilitation Strategies.............................................................. 1-7 2 Detail of Mining Proposal ............................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Tenement Name and Number of the Mine ................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Name of the Mining Operation.................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Commodity to be Mined .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.4 Summary of Program .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.5 Location of the Operation; Direction and Distance from the nearest town........... 2-1 2.6 Land Tenure.................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.7 Certificate of Title......................................................................................................... 2-2 2.8 Type of Operation and Other Associated Tenements and Operations .................. 2-2 2.9 Contact Details of Mine Owner and Operator ........................................................... 2-2 2.10 District Council or Corporation .................................................................................. 2-2 3 Description of Environment ......................................................................... 3-3 3.1 Land Use ....................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.2 Amenity.........................................................................................................................3-3 3.3 Noise, Dust and Air Quality......................................................................................... 3-3 3.4 Local Community......................................................................................................... 3-4 3.5 Climate .......................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.6 Geohazards................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.7 Proximity to Housing and Infrastructure................................................................... 3-6 3.8 Topography and Landscape....................................................................................... 3-7 3.9 Hydrology ..................................................................................................................... 3-7 3.10 Geology and Hydrogeology........................................................................................ 3-8 Prepared for Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd, 21 December 2007 1 MINING PROPOSAL FOR PROPOSED EXTENSION OF BEVERLEY MINE Contents 3.11 Vegetation, Weeds and Plant Pathogens ................................................................ 3-10 3.12 Fauna...........................................................................................................................3-13 3.13 Topsoil and Subsoil................................................................................................... 3-14 3.14 Heritage....................................................................................................................... 3-14 3.14.1 Aboriginal Heritage ...................................................................................... 3-14 3.14.2 European Heritage ...................................................................................... 3-15 3.14.3 Heritage Management ................................................................................. 3-15 3.14.4 National Estate Listings ............................................................................... 3-16 3.15 Proximity to Conservation Areas ............................................................................. 3-16 3.16 Pre-existing Site Contamination and Disturbance ................................................. 3-16 3.17 Natural Radioactivity ................................................................................................. 3-16 3.17.1 Introduction to radioactivity in the Beverley context .................................... 3-16 3.17.2 Background and current radiation levels ..................................................... 3-17 4 Description of the Operation........................................................................ 4-1 4.1 General Description..................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Ore Reserves and Market............................................................................................ 4-1 4.2.1 Geological Environment ................................................................................ 4-1 4.2.2 Reserves and Resources .............................................................................. 4-3 4.2.3 Market............................................................................................................ 4-3 4.2.4 Radioactive Substances and Ores ................................................................ 4-4 4.3 Mining Operations ....................................................................................................... 4-4 4.3.1 Type or Types of Mining Operation to be Carried Out .................................. 4-4 4.3.2 Sequence of Operation.................................................................................. 4-5 4.3.3 Modes and Hours of Operation ..................................................................... 4-5 4.3.4 Field Equipment............................................................................................. 4-6 4.3.5 Processing ..................................................................................................... 4-6 4.3.6 Early Mining in the Extended Lease.............................................................. 4-6 4.4 Wastes......................................................................................................................... 4-10 4.4.1 Drill Cuttings ................................................................................................ 4-10 4.4.2 Mine Solid Wastes....................................................................................... 4-11 4.4.3 Low-level Radioactive Wastes..................................................................... 4-11 4.4.4 Process Wastes - General........................................................................... 4-12 4.4.5 Updated Liquid Waste Disposal Procedure................................................. 4-14 Prepared for Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd, 21 December 2007 2 MINING PROPOSAL FOR PROPOSED EXTENSION OF BEVERLEY MINE Contents 4.4.6 Silt Control and Drainage ............................................................................ 4-16 4.4.7 Airborne wastes........................................................................................... 4-16 4.5 Supporting Infrastructure ......................................................................................... 4-17 4.5.1 Road Access...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Situ Leach (ISL) Mining of Uranium
    In Situ Leach (ISL) Mining of Uranium (June 2009) l Most uranium mining in the USA and Kazakhstan is now by in situ leach methods, also known as in situ recovery (ISR). l In USA ISL is seen as the most cost effective and environmentally acceptable method of mining, and Australian experience supports this. l Australia's first ISL uranium mine is Beverley, which started operation late in 2000. The proposal for Honeymoon has government approval and it is expected to be operating in 2008. Conventional mining involves removing mineralised rock (ore) from the ground, breaking it up and treating it to remove the minerals being sought. In situ leaching (ISL), also known as solution mining, or in situ recovery (ISR) in North America, involves leaving the ore where it is in the ground, and recovering the minerals from it by dissolving them and pumping the pregnant solution to the surface where the minerals can be recovered. Consequently there is little surface disturbance and no tailings or waste rock generated. However, the orebody needs to be permeable to the liquids used, and located so that they do not contaminate ground water away from the orebody. Uranium ISL uses the native groundwater in the orebody which is fortified with a complexing agent and in most cases an oxidant. It is then pumped through the underground orebody to recover the minerals in it by leaching. Once the pregnant solution is returned to the surface, the uranium is recovered in much the same way as in any other uranium plant (mill). In Australian ISL mines (Beverley and the soon to be opened Honeymoon Mine) the oxidant used is hydrogen peroxide and the complexing agent sulfuric acid.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkaroola Geology Information Leaflet
    Arkaroola: A prime Australian site for Mars analogue field research Mars-Oz at Arkaroola: A Prime Australian Site for Mars Analogue Field Research Jonathan D. A. Clarke ([email protected]) and David Willson ([email protected]) Mars Society Australia Mars Society Australia has selected the Arkaroola region in South Australia as its prime area for Mars analogue research. The region is accessible by road and air from Adelaide, the capital of South Australia. Much of the central part of the region is held under private leasehold as a wilderness sanctuary. The lessees are highly supportive of scientific and technological research. The region and its hinterland have a diversity of geological and astrobiological features of interest for Mars research and Mars exploration. These include: GEOLOGY • Modern and ancient (Neoproterozoic, Carboniferous) hydrothermal systems; • Gravel outwash plains of the present desert environment; • Late Proterozoic Wooltana Basalt with localised quartz-haematite breccia veins; • Neoproterozoic evaporitic non-clastic and minor carbonate sediments Of the Callanna and Burra Groups; • Pre-Cretaceous weathering surfaces; • Cretaceous marine shoreline deposits; • Playa lakes • Artesian springs; • Dune fields; • Iron, silica, carbonate and sulphate duricrusts; • Pleistocene high level gravels of fans and pediments, and • Holocene creek gravels. BIOLOGY AND PALAEONTOLOGY • Modern extremophile populations in uranium and sulphide mineralisation; • Extremophiles associated with radioactive hydrothermal springs;
    [Show full text]
  • About Uranium Mining in South Australia Foreword
    The Facts about uranium mining in South Australia Foreword South Australia has been a major producer of uranium since 1988. We are proud of our track record and our global reputation for excellence. The South Australian Government thoroughly To achieve that aim we need to challenge assess mining lease proposals, and through the perceptions of unacceptable hazards stringent conditions, rigorously upholds the associated with the uranium industry. Risks highest standards for monitoring and safety. associated with nuclear energy are judged harsher than competing energy sources. The enduring strength of this State’s leadership in uranium mining is an insistence Access to information and education is on world’s best practice for managing our the key to challenging these perceptions. resources. Uranium – The Facts is just that, the facts that should be the basis for any informed debate Our global reputation enables us to attract about uranium and South Australia’s current the world’s leading uranium miners and role in the global nuclear fuel cycle. lead the country in annual production. Uranium produced in South Australia is equivalent to delivering CO2-free power to 20 million people. Yet with more than 80% of Australia’s total Hon Tom Koutsantonis MP, uranium resource, there remains considerable Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy scope to expand. It’s not enough that we produce exports from the world’s largest uranium deposit at Olympic Dam, we want to unlock the full potential of all South Australia’s uranium assets. How we regulate The Foreign Investment Review The Australian regulatory framework Board examines foreign investment for the uranium industry is widely proposals to ensure the investment is recognised as world’s best practice.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Lake Frome & Strzelecki Regional Reserves 1991-2001
    A Review of Lake Frome and Strzelecki Regional Reserves 1991 – 2001 s & ark W P il l d a l i f n e o i t a N South Australia A Review of Lake Frome and Strzelecki Regional Reserves 1991 – 2001 Strzelecki Regional Reserves Lake Frome This review has been prepared and adopted in pursuance to section 34A of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972. Published by the Department for Environment and Heritage Adelaide, South Australia July 2002 © Department for Environment and Heritage ISBN: 0 7590 1038 2 Prepared by Outback Region National Parks & Wildlife SA Department for Environment and Heritage Front cover photographs: Lake Frome coastline, Lake Frome Regional Reserve, supplied by R Playfair and reproduced with permission. Montecollina Bore, Strzelecki Regional Reserve, supplied by C. Crafter and reproduced with permission. Department for Environment and Heritage TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF ACRONYMS and ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................................iv FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arkaroola Protection Area: a Field Guide to Selected Geological Features
    Arkaroola Protection Area: A field guide to selected geological features Graeme L. Worboys and Stephen B. Hore arkaroola.com.au environment.sa.gov.au Citation: Worboys, G. L. and Hore, S.B. (2013) Arkaroola Protection Area: A field guide to selected geological features. Arkaroola Wilderness Sanctuary and Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Adelaide. Copyright: © This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Australian Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised without the express permission of the authors. Acknowledgements: Many individuals and organisations contributed to the development of this Field Guide. The text has been sourced predominantly from the Arkaroola National Heritage Listing nomination jointly submitted to the Australian Government by the South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources and Margaret and Douglas Sprigg of the Arkaroola Wilderness Sanctuary. Appreciation is expressed for the use of this material. The Field Guide also sourced technical geological quotes from a 2004 field guide developed by John Drexel and Stephen Hore and appreciation is extended for the use of this material. Thanks are particularly extended to Margaret and Douglas Sprigg, Lorraine Edmunds and Dennis Walter of Arkaroola Wilderness Sanctuary; Jason Irving of the South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources; Tim Baker of the Geological Survey of South Australia; the Geological Society of Australia (South Australia Division); Jim Gehling and Joël Brugger of the South Australian Museum; the University of Adelaide; Malcolm William Wallace of the University of Melbourne; Malcolm Walter of the University of New South Wales; Narelle Neumann of Geoscience Australia; and Paul O’Brien of Helivista Helicopters (South Australia) for their assistance in the development of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Eyre Basin (South Australia): Mapping and Conceptual Models of Shallow Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems
    Lake Eyre Basin Springs Assessment Lake Eyre Basin (South Australia): mapping and conceptual models of shallow groundwater dependent ecosystems DEWNR Technical note 2015/22 Funding for these projects has been provided by the Australian Government through the Bioregional Assessment Programme. Lake Eyre Basin Springs Assessment Lake Eyre Basin (South Australia): mapping and conceptual models of shallow groundwater dependent ecosystems Catherine Miles1 and Justin F. Costelloe2 Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources December, 2015 DEWNR Technical note 2015/22 1Miles Environmental Consulting 2Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources GPO Box 1047, Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone National (08) 8463 6946 International +61 8 8463 6946 Fax National (08) 8463 6999 International +61 8 8463 6999 Website www.environment.sa.gov.au Disclaimer The Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources and its employees expressly disclaims all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Information contained in this document is correct at the time of writing. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT ARTESIAN BASIN Responsibility to Any Person Using the Information Or Advice Contained Herein
    S O U T H A U S T R A L I A A N D N O R T H E R N T E R R I T O R Y G R E A T A R T E S I A N B A S I N ( E RNturiyNaturiyaO M A N G A B A S I N ) Pmara JutPumntaara Jutunta YuenduYmuuendumuYuelamu " " Y"uelamu Hydrogeological Map (Part " 2) Nyirri"pi " " Papunya Papunya ! Mount Liebig " Mount Liebig " " " Haasts Bluff Haasts Bluff ! " Ground Elevation & Aquifer Conditions " Groundwater Salinity & Management Zones ! ! !! GAB Wells and Springs Amoonguna ! Amoonguna " GAB Spring " ! ! ! Salinity (μ S/cm) Hermannsburg Hermannsburg ! " " ! Areyonga GAB Spring Exclusion Zone Areyonga ! Well D Spring " Wallace Rockhole Santa Teresa " Wallace Rockhole Santa Teresa " " " " Extent of Saturated Aquifer ! D 1 - 500 ! D 5001 - 7000 Extent of Confined Aquifer ! D 501 - 1000 ! D 7001 - 10000 Titjikala Titjikala " " NT GAB Management Zone ! D ! Extent of Artesian Water 1001 - 1500 D 10001 - 25000 ! D ! Land Surface Elevation (m AHD) 1501 - 2000 D 25001 - 50000 Imanpa Imanpa ! " " ! ! D 2001 - 3000 ! ! 50001 - 100000 High : 1515 ! Mutitjulu Mutitjulu ! ! D " " ! 3001 - 5000 ! ! ! Finke Finke ! ! ! " !"!!! ! Northern Territory GAB Water Control District ! ! ! Low : -15 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! FNWAP Management Zone NORTHERN TERRITORY Birdsville NORTHERN TERRITORY ! ! ! Birdsville " ! ! ! " ! ! SOUTH AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!! !!!! D !! D !!! DD ! DD ! !D ! ! DD !! D !! !D !! D !! D ! D ! D ! D ! D ! !! D ! D ! D ! D ! DDDD ! Western D !! ! ! ! ! Recharge Zone ! ! ! ! ! ! D D ! ! ! ! ! ! N N ! ! A A ! L L ! ! ! ! S S ! ! N N ! ! Western Zone E
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Pages on U Mining by End of October, See Pol D
    URANIUM MINING IN AUSTRALIA Friends of the Earth, Australia foe.org.au/anti-nuclear January 2013 With Australia holding 30-40% of the world's uranium mining was overturned in 2012. In WA, known conventional uranium reserves, the the Liberal government supports uranium mining uranium mining industry hopes to significantly but the Labor opposition opposes any new increase production. However the Coalition uranium mines (but might permit mines that have government, in power from 1996-2007, succeeded received prior approvals). In NSW, the Liberal in establishing only one new mine. The Beverley government supports uranium exploration but has mine in South Australia began commercial not (yet) moved to permit uranium mining. production in 2001. The tiny Honeymoon mine in SA began production in 2011 but in May 2012 joint A 2003 report by a federal Senate References and venture partner Mitsui announced that it was Legislation Committee found "a pattern of under- withdrawing from the Honeymoon project as it performance and non-compliance" in the uranium "could not foresee sufficient economic return from mining industry. It identified many gaps in the project." knowledge and found an absence of reliable data on which to measure the extent of contamination As at January 2013, there is bipartisan support for from the uranium mining industry, and it uranium mining at the federal level and in SA and concluded that changes were necessary "in order the NT. In Queensland, a long-standing ban on to protect the environment and its inhabitants from serious or irreversible damage". The history of secret nuclear weapons research, and committee concluded "that short-term states stockpiling 'civil' plutonium.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Flinders Ranges
    A B Oodnadatta Track C D Innamincka E F Birdsville Track Strzelecki ROAD CONDITIONS The road surface information on this map Track should be used as a guide only. Local TRACK advice should be sought at all times. LAKES Frome With very few exceptions, the lakes STRZELECKI Arkaroola Paralana 'Mt Lyndhurst' Wilderness Hot Springs 1 shown are dry salt pans and do not Ochre Pits Sanctuary 'North Mulga' 1 indicate a permanent source of water. 'Avondale' 'Umberatana' Mt Painter PASTORAL PROPERTIES Lyndhurst The roads in this region pass through Talc Alf Echo Camp working pastoral properties. Please do Backtrack Barraranna Gorge not leave the road and enter these River 4WD properties without prior permission from Arkaroola 'Yankaninna' Ochre the landholder. Most home steads do Wall not provide tourist facilities and are 83 Wooltana shown on this map for navigational Vulkathunha - Cave purposes. Please respect the property 33 Mainwater Pound and privacy of pastoralists. 'Owieandana' 'Wooltana' Coaleld Illinawortina 'Myrtle Springs' Gammon Ranges 30 4WD TRACKS National Park Pound For more information on 4WD Tracks Gerti Johnson Nepouie please obtain a copy of the 4WD Tracks 'Leigh Monument Weetootla Gorge 2 & Repeater Towers brochure. You may Creek' Balcanoona Gorge 2 need to make an appointment and pay Ck 'Depot NEPABUNNA access fees for some tracks. Copley 45 Springs' ABORIGINAL LAND Leigh Creek Nepabunna Balcanoona Aroona Dam 'Angepena' 54 Italowie Nat. Park H.Q. Fence Arrunha Aroona Iga Warta Gorge Sanctuary 'Maynards Vulkathunha - Gammon Ranges Well' National Park Puttapa 'Wertaloona' Copper King Mine Puttapa Moro Gorge Gap HWY NANTAWARRINA Ediacara 'Warraweena' INDIGENOUS Dog Lake Conservation Lake Reserve Afghan PROTECTED AREA 39 Mon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flinders Ranges South Australia: Evidence from Leporillus Spp
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 1999 A holocene vegetation history of the Flinders Ranges South Australia: evidence from Leporillus spp. (stick-nest rat) middens Lynne McCarthy University of Wollongong Recommended Citation McCarthy, Lynne, A holocene vegetation history of the Flinders Ranges South Australia: evidence from Leporillus spp. (stick-nest rat) middens, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Geosciences, University of Wollongong, 1999. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/1962 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] A HOLOCENE VEGETATION HISTORY OF THE FLINDERS RANGES SOUTH AUSTRALIA: EVIDENCE FROM LEPORILLUS SPP. (STICK-NEST RAT) MIDDENS A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY from UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG by LYNNE MCCARTHY B.Env.Sc. BSc (Hons.) SCHOOL OF GEOSCIENCES 1999 This work has not been submitted for a higher degree at any other University or Institution and, unless acknowledged, is my own work. Lynne McCarthy i ABSTRACT Palaeoecological records for semi-arid and arid environments of Australia are limited due to poor preservation of material in this environmental setting. As a consequence, a Holocene vegetation and climatic record for a large part of the continent is incomplete. Leporillus spp. (stick-nest rat) middens provide a wealth of palaeoecological information for Holocene environments in areas where such records are rare. Eighteen middens from three key sites in the Flinders Ranges (Arkaroola-Mount Painter Sanctuary, Mount Chambers Gorge and Brachina Gorge), were investigated in this project to provide a thorough spatial and temporal coverage of palaeoecological sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Flinders Ranges Fire Management Plan 2016
    Northern Flinders Ranges Fire Management Plan 2016 Incorporating: Ikara-Flinders Ranges National Park, Vulkathunha-Gammon Ranges National Park, Ediacara Conservation Park, Bunkers Conservation Reserve and included Crown lands and participating Heritage Agreements Ikara-Flinders Ranges National Park Co-Management Board Vulkathunha-Gammon Ranges National Park Co-Management Board For further information please contact: Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Phone Information Line (08) 8204 1910, or see SA White Pages for your local Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources office. This Fire Management Plan is also available from: www.environment.sa.gov.au/fire/ Front Cover: Ikara (Wilpena Pound) by DEWNR Permissive Licence © State of South Australia through the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources. Apart from fair dealings and other uses permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced, published, communicated, transmitted, modified or commercialised without the prior written approval of the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources. Written requests for permission should be addressed to: Communications Manager Communications and Community Engagement Branch Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources GPO Box 1047 Adelaide SA 5001 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this publication are factually correct , the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources makes no representations and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fitness for any particular purpose of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL STANDING COMMITTEE ON STATE DEVELOPMENT Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019 Report 46 March 2020 www.parliament.nsw.gov.au LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Standing Committee on State Development Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019 Ordered to be printed 4 March 2020 according to Standing Order 231 Report 46 - March 2020 i LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019 New South Wales Parliamentary Library cataloguing-in-publication data: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Standing Committee on State Development. Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019 / Standing Committee on State Development. [Sydney, N.S.W.] : the Committee, 2020. – [xiv, 150] pages ; 30 cm. (Report no. 46 / Standing Committee on State Development) Chair: Hon. Taylor Martin, MLC. “March 2020” ISBN 9781920788599 1. New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council—Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2018. 2. Uranium mines and mining—Law and legislation—New South Wales. 3. Nuclear industry—Law and legislation—New South Wales. 4. Nuclear energy—Law and legislation—New South Wales. I. Martin, Taylor. II. Title. III. Series: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Standing Committee on State Development. Report ; no. 46 622.349 (DDC22) ii Report 46 - March 2020 STANDING COMMITTEE ON STATE DEVELOPMENT Table of contents Terms of reference vi Committee details vii Chair’s foreword
    [Show full text]