DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix F. Maps

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix F. Maps Appendix F. Maps Counties 90° 89° 88° 87° 86° 85° 84° 83° 82° LEGEND 48° 48° CANADA International MAINE State ADAMS County KEWEENAW Shoreline Note: All boundaries and names are MINNESOTA as of January 1, 2000. CANADA 47° HOUGH- 47° TON ONTONAGON BARAGA LUCE GOGEBIC MARQUETTE ALGER CHIPPEWA IRON SCHOOLCRAFT 46° WISCONSIN DICKIN- MACKINAC 46° SON DELTA EMMET MENOMINEE PRESQUE CHARLEVOIX CHEBOYGAN ISLE LEELANAU 45° 45° ANTRIM OTSEGO MONT- ALPENA MORENCY CRAW- GRAND KALKASKA OSCODA ALCONA BENZIE TRAVERSE FORD MISSAUKEE ROSCOM- OGEMAW IOSCO MANISTEE WEXFORD MON 44° ARENAC 44° MASON LAKE OSCEOLA CLARE GLADWIN HURON BAY OCEANA MECOSTA ISABELLA MIDLAND NEWAYGO SANILAC MUSKEGON TUSCOLA MONTCALM GRATIOT SAGINAW 43° LAPEER 43° KENT SHIA- GENESEE ST. CLAIR OTTAWA IONIA CLINTON WASSEE LIVINGS- OAKLAND ALLEGAN BARRY EATON INGHAM TON MACOMB VAN KALA- JACKSON WASHTENAW WAYNE BUREN MAZOO CALHOUN ILLINOIS 42° 0 15 30 45 60 Kilometers 42° ST. MONROE CASS BRANCH LENAWEE 0 15 30 45 60 Miles BERRIEN JOSEPH HILLSDALE OHIO INDIANA 90° 89° 88° 87° 86° 85° 84° 83° Maps Michigan F-1 U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 County Subdivision Outline Map Legend and County Location Index Map Legend Map Sections International CAMPO American Indian Reservation (Federal)¹ 1 Off-Reservation Trust Land¹ ZIA 2 4 Tetlin Tribal Designated Statistical Areas 3 5 State 6 County ERIE 7 8 YORK County Subdivision² ROME Incorporated Place² 11 9 Zena Census Designated Place² 10 Lake Erie Large River, Lake, Water Body, or Shoreline A fishhook joins contiguous and/or discontiguous 12 13 14 parts of the same geographic entity ¹ A ’ ’ following an American Indian area name indicates that tribal subdivisions are defined for that area. The* tribal subdivision boundaries are displayed on the tribal subdivision map(s) immediately following the State/County Subdivision section maps. ² A ’*’ following a place name indicates that the place is coextensive with a separate county subdivision. The county subdivision name is shown only if different than the name of the place. A ’°’ following a place name indicates that the place is an independent place or independent city. An independent place is not part of any legal county subdivision and thus serves as the statistical equivalent of a legal county subdivision. An independent city is not part of any county or legal county subdivision and thus serves as both the statistical equivalent of a county and a legal county subdivision. The name for the county subdivision is always the same as that of the place and never shown separately on the map. Note: All legal boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2000. Where international, state, county, and/or county subdivision boundaries coincide, the map shows the boundary symbol for the highest level of these geographic entities. The county boundary is always shown. Where a county subdivision boundary coincides with a place boundary, the map does not show the place boundary symbol. Any geographic entity name may include ’(pt.)’ if some portion of the entity extends beyond the limits of the map area displayed on the page, or if multiple discontiguous pieces of the entity have been discretely labeled on the page. A geographic entity name may include ’(pts.)’ if many discontiguous pieces exist for that entity that cannot be discretely labeled. The boundaries shown on this map are for Census Bureau statistical data collection and tabulation purposes only; their depiction and designation for statistical purposes does not constitute a determination of jurisdictional authority or rights of ownership or entitlement. County Location Index This list presents the reference coordinates for each county on the county subdivision outline map. Map section numbers refer to the county subdivision outline maps only. COUNTY MAP MAP COUNTY MAP MAP COUNTY MAP MAP SEC REF SEC REF SEC REF Alcona......................... 9 JR-AZ Eaton........................... 13 JG-BM Leelanau..................... 7 IZ-AX Alger............................ 4 IW-AM Emmet......................... 7 JG-AU Lenawee..................... 13 JL-BQ Allegan........................ 12 IY-BM Genesee..................... 14 JN-BJ Livingston.................... 14 JM-BM Alpena......................... 8 JR-AX Gladwin....................... 10 JJ-BE Luce............................ 4 JC-AN Antrim.......................... 7 JE-AX Gogebic....................... 2 ID-AP Mackinac..................... 5 JF-AS Arenac......................... 10 JN-BD Grand Traverse........... 7 JC-AZ Macomb...................... 14 JS-BL Baraga........................ 3 IL-AN Gratiot......................... 13 JI-BI Manistee..................... 11 IX-BB Barry........................... 13 JE-BM Hillsdale...................... 13 JI-BQ Marquette.................... 3 IQ-AO Bay.............................. 10 JM-BF Houghton.................... 3 IK-AM Mason......................... 11 IW-BE Benzie......................... 7 IY-BA Huron.......................... 9 JS-BE Mecosta...................... 11 JE-BG Berrien........................ 12 IV-BQ Ingham........................ 13 JJ-BM Menominee................. 6 IQ-AU Branch......................... 13 JF-BQ Ionia............................ 13 JF-BK Midland....................... 10 JJ-BG Calhoun....................... 13 JF-BO Iosco........................... 9 JR-BB Missaukee................... 11 JF-BB Cass............................ 12 JA-BQ Iron.............................. 3 IK-AQ Monroe........................ 14 JP-BQ Charlevoix................... 7 JD-AU Isabella........................ 10 JG-BG Montcalm.................... 13 JF-BI Cheboygan.................. 8 JJ-AV Jackson....................... 13 JJ-BO Montmorency.............. 8 JL-AX Chippewa.................... 5 JI-AQ Kalamazoo.................. 12 JC-BO Muskegon................... 12 IW-BI Clare........................... 10 JG-BE Kalkaska..................... 7 JF-AZ Newaygo..................... 11 JB-BG Clinton......................... 13 JI-BK Kent............................. 12 JC-BJ Oakland....................... 14 JP-BM Crawford..................... 10 JI-AZ Keweenaw.................. 1 IM-AH Oceana....................... 11 IW-BG Delta............................ 6 IU-AT Lake............................ 11 JB-BE Ogemaw...................... 10 JL-BB Dickinson.................... 3 IO-AR Lapeer......................... 14 JQ-BJ Ontonagon.................. 2 IF-AL F-2 Michigan Maps U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 County Subdivision Outline Map Legend and County Location Index COUNTY MAP MAP SEC REF Osceola....................... 11 JE-BE Oscoda........................ 10 JL-AZ Otsego........................ 7 JI-AX Ottawa......................... 12 IX-BK Presque Isle................ 8 JO-AV Roscommon................ 10 JI-BB Saginaw...................... 10 JL-BH Sanilac........................ 9 JU-BH Schoolcraft.................. 6 IY-AR Shiawassee................. 13 JL-BK St. Clair....................... 14 JU-BK St. Joseph................... 12 JC-BQ Tuscola....................... 9 JP-BH Van Buren................... 12 IY-BO Washtenaw................. 14 JM-BO Wayne......................... 14 JQ-BO Wexford....................... 11 JC-BB Maps Michigan F-3 U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 F-4 Michigan American IndianAreas,Counties,CountySubdivisions,andPlaces-Section1 ID IE IF IG IH II IJ IK IL IM IN IO IP IQ IR IS IT IU 89° 30’ 89° 00’ 88° 30’ 88° 00’ 87° 30’ 87° 00’ A E A E A F A F 48° HOUGHTON (pt.) 00’ 48° A 00’ G EAGLE HARBOR (pt.) A G A H A KEWEENAW H Lake Superior A SEE I SECTION 4 A I 47° 30’ 47° A 30’ J SEE SECTION 2 EAGLE HARBOR (pt.) GRANT A J HOUGHTON (pt.) ALLOUEZ AHMEEK A K SHERMAN A K A SEE SECTION 3 U.S. Census Bureau,Census2000 L A L 47° 00’ 47° A 0 5 10 15 Kilometers 00’ M 0 5 10 15 Miles Maps A M 89° 30’ 89° 00’ 88° 30’ 88° 00’ 87° 30’ 87° 00’ IE IF IG IH II IJ IK IL IM IN IO IP IQ IR IS IT IU American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 2 HY HZ IA IB IC ID IE IF IG IH II IJ IK 90° 30’ 90° 00’ 89° 30’ 89° 00’ A H A I SEE SECTION 1 A I 47° 30’ A 47° J 30’ A J A K A K ONTONAGON A L Lake Superior A L 47° SEE SECTION 3 00’ ONTONAGON A 47° M 00’ BOHEMIA A M ONTONAGON A ONTONAGON N GREENLAND CARP LAKE A N ROCKLAND A O IRONWOOD BERGLAND MATCHWOOD STANNARD A GOGEBIC WAKEFIELD O 46° 30’ WAKEFIELD° McMILLAN 46° A Lake P BES- Gogebic 30’ SEMER° INTERIOR IRON- BESSEMER A WOOD° HAIGHT P ERWIN MARENISCO A Q WATERSMEET LAC VIEUX A DESERT* Q A R A R 46° 00’ A 46° S 00’ 0 5 10 15 Kilometers A 0 5 10 15 Miles S 90° 30’ 90° 00’ 89° 30’ 89° 00’ 88° 30’ HZ IA IB IC ID IE IF IG IH II IJ IK Maps Michigan F-5 U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 3 IH II IJ IK IL IM IN IO IP IQ IR IS IT 47° 89° 00’ 88° 30’ 88° 00’ 87° 30’ 87° 00’ 30’ 47° 30’ A J A J CALUMET COPPER CITY A CALUMET (pt.) K CALUMET (pt.) SEE SECTION 1 A LAURIUM K SCHOOL- CRAFT HANCOCKFRANK- LAKE LINDEN LIN OSCEOLA Hubbell HANCOCK° A SOUTH QUINCY TORCH L RANGE LAKE PORTAGE HOUGHTON° A (pt.) L STANTON 47° HOUGHTON Lake ADAMS Superior 00’ 47° CHASSELL POWELL (pt.) 00’ A M PORTAGE (pt.) A ELM RIVER M POWELL (pt.) L’ANSE ARVON A Big Bay N BARAGA A SEE N LAIRD SECTION 2 L’ANSE L’ANSE MARQUETTE BARAGA MARQUETTE (pt.) L’ANSE A CHAMPION (pt.) MICHIGAMME MARQUETTE O ISHPEMING (pt.) A BARAGA Michi- MARQUETTE° O gamme NEGAUNEE L’ANSE 46° Trowbridge DUNCAN COVINGTON Park (pt.) 30’ NE- 1 SPURR ISH- 46° PEM- GAU- ING° NEE° 30’ A Palmer SANDS Harvey P ELY West Republic Ishpeming K. I. CHOCOLAY A RICHMOND Sawyer P AFB WEST REPUBLIC TILDEN BRANCH HEMATITE SKANDIA SEE A HUMBOLDT SECTION 4 Q IRON Gwinn A IRON RIVER Q FORSYTH BATES CRYSTAL FALLS MANSFIELD TURIN MINERAL WEST HILLS IRON CRYSTAL BRANCH A STAMBAUGH RIVER° FALLS° R SAGOLA A STAMBAUGH° FELCH R CASPIAN° WELLS EWING GAASTRA° 46° ALPHA 00’ MASTODON DICKINSON 46° Br ule 00’ A River BREEN S NORWAY A S IRON BREITUNG SEE SECTION 6 MOUNTAIN° NORWAY° WAUCEDAH A T KINGSFORD° KEY A Quinnesec MARQUETTE T 0 5 10 15 Kilometers 1 SAULT STE. MARIE (pt.) 0 5 10 15 Miles 89° 00’ 88° 30’ 88° 00’ 87° 30’ 87° 00’ II IJ IK IL IM IN IO IP IQ IR IS IT F-6 Michigan Maps U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MARC Code List for Countries: Part I
    Code Sequence PART II: CODE SEQUENCE Discontinued codes are identified by a hyphen preceding the code aa Albania ce Sri Lanka abc Alberta cf Congo (Brazzaville) -ac Ashmore and Cartier Islands cg Congo (Democratic Republic) ae Algeria ch China (Republic : 1949- ) af Afghanistan ci Croatia ag Argentina cj Cayman Islands -ai Anguilla ck Colombia ai Armenia (Republic) cl Chile -air Armenian S.S.R. cm Cameroon aj Azerbaijan -cn Canada -ajr Azerbaijan S.S.R. cou Colorado aku Alaska -cp Canton and Enderbury Islands alu Alabama cq Comoros am Anguilla cr Costa Rica an Andorra -cs Czechoslovakia ao Angola ctu Connecticut aq Antigua and Barbuda cu Cuba aru Arkansas cv Cape Verde as American Samoa cw Cook Islands at Australia cx Central African Republic au Austria cy Cyprus aw Aruba -cz Canal Zone ay Antarctica dcu District of Columbia azu Arizona deu Delaware ba Bahrain dk Denmark bb Barbados dm Benin bcc British Columbia dq Dominica bd Burundi dr Dominican Republic be Belgium ea Eritrea bf Bahamas ec Ecuador bg Bangladesh eg Equatorial Guinea bh Belize em East Timor bi British Indian Ocean Territory enk England bl Brazil er Estonia bm Bermuda Islands -err Estonia bn Bosnia and Hercegovina es El Salvador bo Bolivia et Ethiopia bp Solomon Islands fa Faroe Islands br Burma fg French Guiana bs Botswana fi Finland bt Bhutan fj Fiji bu Bulgaria fk Falkland Islands bv Bouvet Island flu Florida bw Belarus fm Micronesia (Federated States) -bwr Byelorussian S.S.R. fp French Polynesia bx Brunei fr France cau California fs Terres australes et antarctiques cb Cambodia françaises cc China ft Djibouti cd Chad gau Georgia MARC Code List for Countries page 37 Code Sequence gb Kiribati kz Kazakhstan gd Grenada -kzr Kazakh S.S.R.
    [Show full text]
  • The CANADIAN FIELD-NATURALIST
    The CANADIAN FIELD-NATURALIST Published by THE OTTAWA FIELD-NATURALISTS’ CLUB, Ottawa Canada Linda J. Gormezano © A black and white version of this photo appears on the cover of Volume 122, Number 4 (Oct–Dec 2008) of the Journal and is referred to in the text of Rockwell, Gormezano and Hedman 122:323-326. Grizzly Bears, Ursus arctos, in Wapusk National Park, Northeastern Manitoba ROBERT ROCKWELL 1,3 , L INDA GORMEZANO 1, and DARYLL HEDMAN 2 1Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79 th Street, New York, New York 10024 USA 2Manitoba Conservation, Thompson, Manitoba R8N 1X4 Canada 3Corresponding author: Robert Rockwell e-mail: [email protected] Rockwell, Robert, Linda Gormezano, and Daryll Hedman. 2008. Grizzly Bears, Ursus arctos, in Wapusk National Park, northeastern Manitoba. Canadian Field-Naturalist 122(4): 323-326. We report on nine sightings of Grizzly Bears ( Ursus arctos ) in northeastern Manitoba in what is now Wapusk National Park. Although biological research in the region has been conducted regularly since 1965, all sightings have been made since 1996. The Grizzly Bears were seen either along rivers known to harbor fish or in an area known for berries . Key Words: Grizzly Bear, Ursus arctos , Wapusk National Park, Manitoba, Canada. Grizzly Bears ( Ursus arctos ) are reported to have been absent from Manitoba historically at least through 1989 (Banfield 1959, 1974; Harington et al. 1962; Banci 1991, McLellan And Bianci 1999). Some recent accounts and range maps have included Manitoba in the Grizzly Bear’s regular range (e.g., Schwartz et al. 2003), while others indicate that the regular range ends north of the Manitoba border but list rare, extra-limital observations for at least two sites along the Hudson Bay coast of Manitoba (e.g., Ross 2002*).
    [Show full text]
  • Jg U O F N'.Tio:;
    J GUOF N'.TIO:;, C. 121,1.:, 44.12 34/711. Communicated to the Council and Members Geneva ; inarch 17th. 19 34. of the League. SAAR E^STN. PETITION FROM IHE "SAARL.iNPISCHE WI RT5C1IAFTSYE RE INI GUNG” . Note by the Secretary-Genera 1, The Secretary-General has the honour to circulate for the information of the Council and Members of the League a letter from the Chair : .an of the Governing Com­ mission of the Saar Territory, dated March Oth, 1934, enclosing a petition from the Saarl&ndische Wirtschafts- vereinigung", dated February 19th, 1934. Translation) Saarbruck, March 8th, 1934. To the Secretary-General of the League of Nations. Sir, I have the honour to send you herewith a petition, dated February 19th, 1934, addressed to the Council of the League of Nations by the Saar Economic Association ( :,Saarl9ndische Wirtschaftavereinigung”) „ The Governing Commission, referring to its last periodi­ cal report and to the special reports submitted by it to the Council in January 1934, considers that the measures concerning the allocation of meeting-halls, licensed premises, etc . seem to come vri thin the province of the Plebiscite Co emission which is to be appointed by the Council. I have the honour to be, etc., (Signed) G. G. KNOX, 2 - nslation from G-êrrrrn j SAAR ECONOMIC AS SC 01, TION Saarlouis, February 19th, 1934 The undersigned Committee of the Saar iicononic Associa­ tion, Saarlouis, has the honour to acquaint the League of Nations with the following : The League of Nations has devoted special attention to the question of the plebiscite in the Saar Territory and has appointed a sps cial Commission for this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Welles Family in England
    HISTORY OFHE T WELLES F AMILY IN E NGLAND; WITH T HEIR DERIVATION IN THIS COUNTRY FROM GOVERNOR THOMAS WELLES, OF CONNECTICUT. By A LBERT WELLES, PRESIDENT O P THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OP HERALDRY AND GENBALOGICAL REGISTRY OP NEW YORK. (ASSISTED B Y H. H. CLEMENTS, ESQ.) BJHttl)n a account of tljt Wu\\t% JFamtlg fn fHassssacIjusrtta, By H ENRY WINTHROP SARGENT, OP B OSTON. BOSTON: P RESS OF JOHN WILSON AND SON. 1874. II )2 < 7-'/ < INTRODUCTION. ^/^Sn i Chronology, so in Genealogy there are certain landmarks. Thus,n i France, to trace back to Charlemagne is the desideratum ; in England, to the Norman Con quest; and in the New England States, to the Puri tans, or first settlement of the country. The origin of but few nations or individuals can be precisely traced or ascertained. " The lapse of ages is inces santly thickening the veil which is spread over remote objects and events. The light becomes fainter as we proceed, the objects more obscure and uncertain, until Time at length spreads her sable mantle over them, and we behold them no more." Its i stated, among the librarians and officers of historical institutions in the Eastern States, that not two per cent of the inquirers succeed in establishing the connection between their ancestors here and the family abroad. Most of the emigrants 2 I NTROD UCTION. fled f rom religious persecution, and, instead of pro mulgating their derivation or history, rather sup pressed all knowledge of it, so that their descendants had no direct traditions. On this account it be comes almost necessary to give the descendants separately of each of the original emigrants to this country, with a general account of the family abroad, as far as it can be learned from history, without trusting too much to tradition, which however is often the only source of information on these matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuing Evolution of H6N2 Influenza a Virus in South African
    Abolnik et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2019) 15:455 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2210-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Continuing evolution of H6N2 influenza a virus in South African chickens and the implications for diagnosis and control Celia Abolnik1* , Christine Strydom2, Dionne Linda Rauff2, Daniel Barend Rudolph Wandrag1 and Deryn Petty3 Abstract Background: The threat of poultry-origin H6 avian influenza viruses to human health emphasizes the importance of monitoring their evolution. South Africa’s H6N2 epidemic in chickens began in 2001 and two co-circulating antigenic sub-lineages of H6N2 could be distinguished from the outset. The true incidence and prevalence of H6N2 in the country has been difficult to determine, partly due to the continued use of an inactivated whole virus H6N2 vaccine and the inability to distinguish vaccinated from non-vaccinated birds on serology tests. In the present study, the complete genomes of 12 H6N2 viruses isolated from various farming systems between September 2015 and February 2019 in three major chicken-producing regions were analysed and a serological experiment was used to demonstrate the effects of antigenic mismatch in diagnostic tests. Results: Genetic drift in H6N2 continued and antigenic diversity in sub-lineage I is increasing; no sub-lineage II viruses were detected. Reassortment patterns indicated epidemiological connections between provinces as well as different farming systems, but there was no reassortment with wild bird or ostrich influenza viruses. The sequence mismatch between the official antigens used for routine hemagglutination inhibition (HI) testing and circulating field strains has increased steadily, and we demonstrated that H6N2 field infections are likely to be missed.
    [Show full text]
  • The U-Shaped Line and a Categorization of the Ocean Disputes in the South China
    This article was downloaded by: [Michael Sheng-Ti Gau] On: 10 February 2012, At: 16:58 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Ocean Development & International Law Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uodl20 The U-Shaped Line and a Categorization of the Ocean Disputes in the South China Sea Michael Sheng-Ti Gau a a Institute of Law of the Sea, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan, Republic of China Available online: 10 Feb 2012 To cite this article: Michael Sheng-Ti Gau (2012): The U-Shaped Line and a Categorization of the Ocean Disputes in the South China Sea, Ocean Development & International Law, 43:1, 57-69 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2012.647499 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Denationalizing International Law in the Senkaku/Diaoyu Island Dispute
    THE PACIFIC WAR, CONTINUED: DENATIONALIZING INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE SENKAKU/DIAOYU ISLAND DISPUTE Joseph Jackson Harris* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 588 II. BACKGROUND ................................................................................. 591 A. Each State’s Historical Links to the Islands............................. 591 B. A New Dimension to the Dispute: Economic Opportunities Emerge ..................................................................................... 593 III. INTERNATIONAL LAW GOVERNING THE DISPUTE .......................... 594 A. Territorial Acquisition and International Rules of Sovereignty ............................................................................... 594 B The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and Exclusive Economic Rights ...................................................... 596 IV. COMPETING LEGAL CLAIMS AND THE INTERACTION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, NATIONALIST HISTORY, AND STATE ECONOMIC INTERESTS .................................................................... 596 A. Problems Raised By the Applicable International Law ........... 596 B. The Roots of the Conflict in the Sino-Japanese Wars .............. 597 V. ALTERNATIVE RULES THAT MIGHT PROVIDE MORE STABLE GROUNDS FOR RESOLUTION OF THE DISPUTE ................................ 604 A. Exclusive Economic Zones: Flexibility over Brittleness .......... 608 B. Minimal Contacts Baseline and Binding Arbitration ............... 609 C. The
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Litigation
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 1-1999 Parallel Litigation James P. George Texas A&M University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation James P. George, Parallel Litigation, 51 Baylor L. Rev. 769 (1999). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/427 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PARALLEL LITIGATION' James P. George- TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PARALLEL LAWSUITS--AN OVERVIEW ............................................... 773 A. ParallelLitigation Defined and Distinguished............................ 773 B. The Milieu--FourDistinct Settings for ParallelLitigation .......... 776 C. The Remedies: Five Responses to ParallelLitigation ................. 777 1. Do Nothing ............................................................................. 777 2. Transfer and Consolidation .................................................... 777 3. Dismissals and Stays (and Abatements) ............................... 778 4. Antisuit Injunctions ................................................................ 780 D. The Common Doctrines: Six Themes in ParallelLitigation ....... 782 1. The First-Filed Case ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nuns Adopt Nlicy of Sinking All Mercy Ships
    AMERICANS SMITE GERMANS; CAPTURE TOWff BAKER AND DANIELS First Photo of Hun U-Boat Raider SUPPORT WILSON IN NUNS ADOPT FOURTH OF JULY WIRE CONTROL PLAh 300 TEUTON Which Sank U. S. Vessels Off Coast tBr-Auocl aUd Prua ] TO BE OBSERVED Washington, , July. 2^-aecretarlei Baker and Danie ls and Postmastei NLICY OF General Burl eson appeared today oe IN MAN Y LANDS fore the house interstate and forelgt PRISO NERS commerce committees in support ^ o Cities of U. S. 'Complete the bill approv ed .tf President Wll. SINKING ALL Plans for Celebratio n son authorising government contro " ¦ ' '¦ '' ¦ and operaUon of telegraph, telephone TAKEN ' WHEN .. - . ot Day.; . ; radio and.c able systems. - '..; In the meantime, the house' mllltarj MERCY SHIPS [By AiisoeltMd PTeu.] cmnmlUee. met to consider' a measun Introduced br Now York, July, 2.—One of the. 40 Aeprosentatlv e Lurtn o. MEN ATTACK Now- ;York,:«i niUar to the Aswell bli: 1234 MISSING AS HOSPI- natlbnal divisions in. the .monster. Ini discussed by the cabinet officers but dependence day parade tha t will fea- specifically, empowering , the- pre si- VILLA CrE OP VAUX "6M TAL SHIP IS ture , tho celebration .of . the" day In dent to operate the conununlcatlot ' • Now Tor fe will 'consistVof one man. systems subject' to tho se , condition! MAENE FEO NT PALwi . , SUNK The mayor 's committee' -on natio nal ot law. so far as applicable , which ar< ' defense ' enforced : as to .the steam rillraadi : •;; • 'Tp-TDr. s. ;FOECE. - .ya , , ' ' ' today announ¦ ced 'that' permis - * sion to march, as' ' ' While under federa l control.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES of the MEETING of the DANE COUNTY ENVIRONMENT, AGRICULTURE and NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE Date & Time: Thursday, August 6, 2009 – 6:30 P.M
    MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DANE COUNTY ENVIRONMENT, AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE date & time: Thursday, August 6, 2009 – 6:30 p.m. location: City-County Building, Room 315 210 MLK Jr Blvd, Madison, WI 53703 Members present: J. Patrick Downing, Chuck Erickson, Ronn Ferrell, Duane Gau, Wyndham Manning, Kyle Richmond, Bob Salov Others present: Kevin Connors, Lee Cunningham, Sup Hendrick, Sup Stoebig Members of the Public: Donald Hoffman, Renee Lauber, Dan Maxfeld, James Pulvermacher, Timothy Rahl, Phil Salkin, Arden T. Sandsnes, Eric W. Sandsnes, Steven Schulz 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Richmond at 6:35 p.m. 2. Approve Minutes of July 7, 2009 Motion by Ferrell, second by Erickson, to approve meeting minutes of July 7, 2009 with the following correction: Item #6, Res. 27, 09-10, motion for no recommendation, Erickson and Gau voted yes, Downing, Ferrell and Salov voted no. MC 6-0 3. Public Comment None. 4. Announcements None. Chair Richmond called for a change in order of the agenda. 5. County Board Referrals Res. 91, 09-10 - Acceptance of a WI DNR Grant-Yahara Lakes Partnership Motion by Erickson, second by Gau, to approve Res. 91, 09-10. MC 6-0 Res. 89, 09-10 - Transfer Funds to Financial Education Center Director Position Sup. Stoebig presented Res. 89, 09-10. Sup Downing present. Motion by Erickson, second by Manning, to approve Res. 89, 09-10. MC 7-0 Res. 86, 09-10 - Authorizing Acceptance of Grant from the Nature Conservancy for Water Monitoring Motion by Gau, second by Erickson, to approve Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Kamal Rural Municipality (Final Report)
    Nepal Government Kamal Rural Municipality Office of the Rural Municipal Executive Jhapa, Province no 1 RURAL MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT MASTER PLAN of Kamal Rural Municipality (Final Report) Submitted by: Galaxy Engineering Trade Link Pvt. Ltd. Bhaktapur Nepal June 2020 Rural Municipality Transport Master Plan Table of Contents Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives of RMTMP ..................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope and Limitations of RMTMP .................................................................................. 2 1.4 Inception Methodology .................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1 Desk Study ................................................................................................................ 3 1.5 Planning Approach and Methodology.............................................................................. 3 1.5.1 Conceptual Framework ............................................................................................. 4 1.6 MOBILIZATION OF THE TEAM ................................................................................. 9 1.7 ORIENTATION OF THE STAFF MEMBERS .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Municipality Profile
    RURAL MUNICIPALITY PROFILE Office of Rural Municipality Arughat Province no. 4 2074 , ii , Abbreviation Acronyms Full Form VDC Village Development Committee RM Rural Municipality FY Fiscal Year M Meter Mm Millimeter Km Kilo meter DDC District Development Committee DCWB District Child Welfare Board DRCN District Road Core Network Ha Hector ECD Education for Child Development SLC School Leaving Certificate DEO District Education Office DHO District Health Office CLC Community Learning Center PS Primary School LSS Lower Secondary School SS Secondary School DCWB District Child Welfare Board iii , Contents 1 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Method ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Limitation of Study .......................................................................................................... 2 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Geo-Physical
    [Show full text]