Mummified Precocial Bird Wings in Mid- Cretaceous Burmese Amber

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mummified Precocial Bird Wings in Mid- Cretaceous Burmese Amber Xing, L., McKellar, R. C., Wang, M., Bai, M., O'Connor, J. K., Benton, M. J., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Tseng, K., Lockley, M. G., Li, G., Zhang, W., & Xu, X. (2016). Mummified precocial bird wings in mid- Cretaceous Burmese amber. Nature Communications, 7, [12089]. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12089 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.1038/ncomms12089 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Nature Publishing Group at | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12089. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ ARTICLE Received 18 Jan 2016 | Accepted 27 May 2016 | Published 28 Jun 2016 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12089 OPEN Mummified precocial bird wings in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber Lida Xing1,2,*, Ryan C. McKellar3,4,*, Min Wang5,*, Ming Bai6,*, Jingmai K. O’Connor5, Michael J. Benton7, Jianping Zhang2, Yan Wang8, Kuowei Tseng9, Martin G. Lockley10, Gang Li11, Weiwei Zhang12 & Xing Xu5,* Our knowledge of Cretaceous plumage is limited by the fossil record itself: compression fossils surrounding skeletons lack the finest morphological details and seldom preserve visible traces of colour, while discoveries in amber have been disassociated from their source animals. Here we report the osteology, plumage and pterylosis of two exceptionally preserved theropod wings from Burmese amber, with vestiges of soft tissues. The extremely small size and osteological development of the wings, combined with their digit proportions, strongly suggests that the remains represent precocial hatchlings of enantiornithine birds. These specimens demonstrate that the plumage types associated with modern birds were present within single individuals of Enantiornithes by the Cenomanian (99 million years ago), providing insights into plumage arrangement and microstructure alongside immature skeletal remains. This finding brings new detail to our understanding of infrequently preserved juveniles, including the first concrete examples of follicles, feather tracts and apteria in Cretaceous avialans. 1 State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China. 2 School of the Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China. 3 Palaeontology, Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4P 2V7. 4 Biology Department, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4S 0A2. 5 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China. 6 Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. 7 School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK. 8 Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China. 9 Department of Exercise and Health Science, University of Taipei, Taipei 11153, China. 10 Dinosaur Tracks Museum, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado 80217, USA. 11 Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China. 12 P.O. Box 4680, Chongqing 400015, China. * These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to L.X. (email: [email protected]) or to R.C.M. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 7:12089 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12089 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12089 he mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber deposit of northeastern including Archaeopteryx, Jeholornis and Confuciusornis18–20,25. Myanmar is one of the most prolific and well-studied The minor metacarpal terminates distal to the major metacarpal, Tsources of exceptionally preserved Mesozoic arthropod and a synapomorphy of enantiornithines20,26. The minor metacarpal plant fossils, but work on feathers from this deposit has just is dorsoventrally expanded, in caudal view appearing as robust as begun1–4. Previous studies of plumage in Cretaceous amber the major metacarpal, a feature common in enantiornithines27. have been based on isolated feathers, leaving taxonomy of the Both specimens preserve a single, reduced, wedge-shaped phalanx feather-bearers open to debate5,6, and amber in vertebrate in the minor digit as in some ornithothoracines. bone beds has seldom yielded fossils7. Otherwise, Cretaceous feathers are commonly known from carbonaceous compression fossils8–10, and three-dimensional preservation in amber is Plumage in DIP-V-15100. Specimen DIP-V-15100 (Fig. 2, extremely rare. The combined fossil record of amber and Supplementary Figs 1 and 2) preserves a range of plumage from compression fossils has provided many insights into how the the manus and distal forearm. This includes the basal portions of feather types associated with modern birds developed11,12, but nine highly asymmetrical primary flight feathers and five these glimpses are restricted by preservation in each fossil type. secondary feathers (six of the primaries are conclusive, but the The discovery of two partial bird wings in Burmese amber unites distinction between primary and secondary feathers is obscured taxonomic and ontogenetic information from osteology with by overlap within the proximal part of the wing; Figs 1a and 2c). microscopic preservation down to the level of individual feather The rachises within primaries are sub-cylindrical in cross-section barbules and their pigment distributions. This new source of (expanded dorsoventrally and constricted laterally), with a weakly information includes integumentary features incompletely known developed ventral ridge and groove combination (Fig. 2d). Each in the compression fossil record13. barb ramus is lanceolate and bears an asymmetrical arrangement The studied specimens come from the Angbamo site, Tanai of proximal barbules that are blade-shaped throughout most of Township, Myitkyina District, Kachin Province of Myanmar. A their length, along with blade-shaped distal barbules that taper combination of biostratigraphy and radiometric dating have into a poorly-defined pennulum bearing hooklets (Fig. 2e). established an age estimate of 98.8±0.6 Ma for this deposit2,14,15. The alula has three feathers clearly visible, and is distinct from the The two partial wings (DIP-V-15100 and DIP-V-15101) are tiny, main surface of the wing (Fig. 2a,g). Barbs within the alula and are preserved within a few cubic centimeters of amber. have much broader and more asymmetrical barbules than in the They were examined by combining synchrotron X-ray micro-CT primaries and coverts, distal barbules have a well-developed data for osteology, with standard macro- and microscopic observations of integumentary structures. The small size and poorly-defined articular facets indicate that both specimens ab were juveniles at the time of death. Although the specimens are similar in gross morphology, proportions and some plumage characteristics, their immaturity limits detailed comparisons. We tentatively suggest that the specimens belong to the same mi ma species, and suggest that the following anatomical description should be treated with some caution, given the potential for ul mim mam large-scale ontogenetic changes. ra al Results am Osteology. In both wing fragments, the ulna and radius are incomplete and missing their proximal parts (Fig. 1). The ulna is mediolaterally compressed and bears a well-defined semilunate cde trochlear surface distally. There is no sign of quill knobs for the attachment of the secondary remiges. The radius is straight and measures less than half the width of the ulna. Only three digits are present, and the preserved phalanges suggest that the manual formula is 2-3-1. To avoid confusion about digital identities among three-fingered theropods including birds (I-II-III or ma II-III-IV; see ref. 16 and references therein), we use the alular, mi major and minor digit to refer to the anterior, middle and posterior mam digits, respectively. The alular metacarpal is rod-like and long, approaching one-quarter of the major digit in length, and 455% of the length of alular phalanx-1, whereas in basal avialans and mim non-avialan theropods, like dromaesaurids, the latter ratio is al higher17–21. As in most basal avialans21,22, alular phalanx-1 fails to reach the distal end of the major metacarpal (Fig. 1b,e), but the opposite is true in most non-avialan theropods, such as dromaeosaurids and scansoriopterygids17,23. The alular ungual Figure 1 | SR X-ray lCT reconstructions of osteology in DIP-V-15100 and is slightly smaller than that of the major digit, and both claws are DIP-V-15101. (a) Mummified DIP-V-15100, showing rachises, skin, muscle strongly recurved. The major metacarpal is robust and rod-like, and claws. (b) Skeletal morphology of DIP-V-15100, using different density and forms a weakly defined ginglymoid articular facet for major threshold. (c) Mummified DIP-V-15101, showing rachises, skin, muscle and phalanx-1. As in Sapeornis and more advanced birds such as claws. (d) Skeletal morphology
Recommended publications
  • Mummified Precocial Bird Wings in Mid-Cretaceous
    ARTICLE Received 18 Jan 2016 | Accepted 27 May 2016 | Published 28 Jun 2016 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12089 OPEN Mummified precocial bird wings in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber Lida Xing1,2,*, Ryan C. McKellar3,4,*, Min Wang5,*, Ming Bai6,*, Jingmai K. O’Connor5, Michael J. Benton7, Jianping Zhang2, Yan Wang8, Kuowei Tseng9, Martin G. Lockley10, Gang Li11, Weiwei Zhang12 & Xing Xu5,* Our knowledge of Cretaceous plumage is limited by the fossil record itself: compression fossils surrounding skeletons lack the finest morphological details and seldom preserve visible traces of colour, while discoveries in amber have been disassociated from their source animals. Here we report the osteology, plumage and pterylosis of two exceptionally preserved theropod wings from Burmese amber, with vestiges of soft tissues. The extremely small size and osteological development of the wings, combined with their digit proportions, strongly suggests that the remains represent precocial hatchlings of enantiornithine birds. These specimens demonstrate that the plumage types associated with modern birds were present within single individuals of Enantiornithes by the Cenomanian (99 million years ago), providing insights into plumage arrangement and microstructure alongside immature skeletal remains. This finding brings new detail to our understanding of infrequently preserved juveniles, including the first concrete examples of follicles, feather tracts and apteria in Cretaceous avialans. 1 State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China. 2 School of the Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China. 3 Palaeontology, Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4P 2V7. 4 Biology Department, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4S 0A2.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Fossil Resources May 13-15, 2014 Rapid City, South Dakota
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH CONFERENCE ON FOSSIL RESOURCES May 13-15, 2014 Rapid City, South Dakota Edited by Vincent L. Santucci, Gregory A. Liggett, Barbara A. Beasley, H. Gregory McDonald and Justin Tweet Dakoterra Vol. 6 Eocene-Oligocene rocks in Badlands National Park, South Dakoata. Table of Contents Dedication ....................................................................................8 Introduction ..................................................................................9 Presentation Abstracts *Preserving THE PYGMY MAMMOTH: TWENTY YEARS OF collaboration BETWEEN CHANNEL ISLANDS National PARK AND THE MAMMOTH SITE OF HOT SPRINGS, S. D., INC. LARRY D. AGENBROAD, MONICA M. BUGBEE, DON P. MORRIS and W. JUSTIN WILKINS .......................10 PERMITS AND PALEONTOLOGY ON BLM COLORADO: RESULTS FROM 2009 TO 2013 HARLEY J. ARMSTRONG .....................................................................................................................................10 DEVIL’S COULEE DINOSAUR EGG SITE AND THE WILLOW CREEK HOODOOS: HOW SITE VARIABLES INFLUENCE DECISIONS MADE REGARDING PUBLIC ACCESS AND USE AT TWO DESIGNATED PROVINCIAL HISTORIC SITES IN ALBERTA, CANADA JENNIFER M. BANCESCU ...................................................................................................................................12 USDA FOREST SERVICE PALEONTOLOGY PASSPORT IN TIME PROGRAM: COST EFFECTIVE WAY TO GET FEDERAL PALEONTOLOGY PROJECTS COMPLETED BARBARA A. BEASLEY and SALLY SHELTON ...................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • A New Diverse Enantiornithine Family (Bohaiornithidae Fam. Nov.) from the Lower Cretaceous of China with Information from Two New Species
    -76 第52卷 第1期 古 脊 椎 动 物 学 报 pp. 31 2014年1月 VERTEBRATA PALASIATICA figs. 1-11 A new diverse enantiornithine family (Bohaiornithidae fam. nov.) from the Lower Cretaceous of China with information from two new species WANG Min1,2 ZHOU Zhong-He1 Jingmai K. O’CONNOR1 Nikita V. ZELENKOV3 (1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100044 [email protected]) (2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049) (3 Borissiak Palaeontological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow 117997) Abstract Two new enantiornithine birds, Parabohaiornis martini gen. et sp. nov., and Longusunguis kurochkini gen. et sp. nov., are reported here based on three nearly complete skeletons from the Lower Cretaceous lacustrine deposits of the Jiufotang Formation in Liaoning, northeastern China. The two new species share several unique features with Bohaiornis, Shenqiornis, Sulcavis and Zhouornis, including a robust rostrum with robust, subconical teeth, furcula with blunt omal expansions, sternal trabeculae caudolaterally directed, short and stout tarsometatarsus with hypertrophied ungual on digit Ⅲ. A close relationship among the two new species and four previously described taxa is confirmed by a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis, leading us to erect Bohaiornithidae fam. nov. With six known taxa, Bohaiornithidae is the most diverse recognized enantiornithine family. The robust morphology of the rostrum and foot suggests bohaiornithids occupied a specialized ecological niche compared to other Early Cretaceous enantiornithines. Key words Early Cretaceous, Jehol Biota, Enantiornithes, Bohaiornis, Shenqiornis, Sulcavis, Zhouornis 1 Introduction The abundant and continuous discoveries of exquisitely preserved plant, invertebrate, and vertebrate fossils from the Lower Cretaceous of China have made the Jehol Biota one of the world’s most important Mesozoic terrestrial biomes (Chang et al., 2001; Zhou et al., 2003; Zhou, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Insects
    CY501-PIND[733-756].qxd 2/17/05 2:10 AM Page 733 Quark07 Quark07:BOOKS:CY501-Grimaldi: INDEX 12S rDNA, 32, 228, 269 Aenetus, 557 91; general, 57; inclusions, 57; menageries 16S rDNA, 32, 60, 237, 249, 269 Aenigmatiinae, 536 in, 56; Mexican, 55; parasitism in, 57; 18S rDNA, 32, 60, 61, 158, 228, 274, 275, 285, Aenne, 489 preservation in, 58; resinite, 55; sub-fossil 304, 307, 335, 360, 366, 369, 395, 399, 402, Aeolothripidae, 284, 285, 286 resin, 57; symbioses in, 303; taphonomy, 468, 475 Aeshnoidea, 187 57 28S rDNA, 32, 158, 278, 402, 468, 475, 522, 526 African rock crawlers (see Ambermantis wozniaki, 259 Mantophasmatodea) Amblycera, 274, 278 A Afroclinocera, 630 Amblyoponini, 446, 490 aardvark, 638 Agaonidae, 573, 616: fossil, 423 Amblypygida, 99, 104, 105: in amber, 104 abdomen: function, 131; structure, 131–136 Agaoninae, 423 Amborella trichopoda, 613, 620 Abies, 410 Agassiz, Alexander, 26 Ameghinoia, 450, 632 Abrocomophagidae, 274 Agathiphaga, 560 Ameletopsidae, 628 Acacia, 283 Agathiphagidae, 561, 562, 567, 630 American Museum of Natural History, 26, 87, acalyptrate Diptera: ecological diversity, 540; Agathis, 76 91 taxonomy, 540 Agelaia, 439 Amesiginae, 630 Acanthocnemidae, 391 ages, using fossils, 37–39; using DNA, 38–40 ametaboly, 331 Acari, 99, 105–107: diversity, 101, fossils, 53, Ageniellini, 435 amino acids: racemization, 61 105–107; in-Cretaceous amber, 105, 106 Aglaspidida, 99 ammonites, 63, 642 Aceraceae, 413 Aglia, 582 Amorphoscelidae, 254, 257 Acerentomoidea, 113 Agrias, 600 Amphientomidae, 270 Acherontia atropos, 585
    [Show full text]
  • Fossils Mike Viney
    Fossils Mike Viney Hermanophyton taylorii Morrison Formation, Brushy Basin Member Upper Jurassic East McElmo Creek, Cortez, Colorado 8.5 cm x 7.5 cm 1 The word fossil is derived from the Latin fossilis, which means "dug up". Initially, the term fossil applied to any strange or interesting material found within rock whether or not it was of organic origin (Prothero, 2004, p. 5). Most modern definitions include the concept that fossils are evidence of ancient organisms, which have become a part of the Earth’s crust. The word ancient is arbitrary. To some ancient applies only to extinct organisms while, to others, it implies time limits. Grimaldi and Engel (2005) point out many would like to restrict the term fossil to species that have become naturally extinct. They argue that having this knowledge is problematic. Grimaldi and Engel suggest the following practical definition, "...a fossil is the remains or workings of any species, living or extinct, that have been naturally preserved for several thousand years or more (p. 62). A more common time limit defines fossils as being prehistoric thus; fossils preserve remains or activities of ancient organisms older than 10,000 years (Garcia & Miller, 1998, p. 14; Schopf, 1975, p. 27). The majority of fossils are found in sedimentary rocks. Organisms become trapped within sediment layers due to the action of water, wind or gravity. Fossils can sometimes be found in metamorphic rocks formed from fossiliferous sedimentary rocks altered by heat and pressure. Fossils can even be found in igneous rock created from lahars or pyroclastic flows that entomb trees or other organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Mummified Precocial Bird Wings in Mid- Cretaceous Burmese Amber
    Xing, L., McKellar, R. C., Wang, M., Bai, M., O'Connor, J. K., Benton, M. J., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Tseng, K., Lockley, M. G., Li, G., Zhang, W., & Xu, X. (2016). Mummified precocial bird wings in mid- Cretaceous Burmese amber. Nature Communications, 7, [12089]. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12089 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.1038/ncomms12089 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Nature Publishing Group at | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12089. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ ARTICLE Received 18 Jan 2016 | Accepted 27 May 2016 | Published 28 Jun 2016 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12089 OPEN Mummified precocial bird wings in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber Lida Xing1,2,*, Ryan C. McKellar3,4,*, Min Wang5,*, Ming Bai6,*, Jingmai K. O’Connor5, Michael J. Benton7, Jianping Zhang2, Yan Wang8, Kuowei Tseng9, Martin G. Lockley10, Gang Li11, Weiwei Zhang12 & Xing Xu5,* Our knowledge of Cretaceous plumage is limited by the fossil record itself: compression fossils surrounding skeletons lack the finest morphological details and seldom preserve visible traces of colour, while discoveries in amber have been disassociated from their source animals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Open Ornithology Journal, 2016, 9, 14-38 the Open Ornithology Journal
    Send Orders for Reprints to [email protected] 14 The Open Ornithology Journal, 2016, 9, 14-38 The Open Ornithology Journal Content list available at: www.benthamopen.com/TOOENIJ/ DOI: 10.2174/1874453201609010014 FANTASY VS REALITY: A Critique of Smith et al.'s Bird Origins Alan Feduccia* Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, United States of America Received: November 18, 2015 Revised: February 11, 2016 Accepted: February 26, 2016 Abstract: Adherents of the current orthodoxy of a derivation of birds from theropod dinosaurs, criticize the commentary by Feduccia (2013, Auk, 130) [1 - 12] entitled “Bird Origins Anew” as well as numerous papers by Lingham-Soliar on theropod dermal fibers, using numerous mischaracterizations and misstatements of content, and illustrate their own misconceptions of the nature of the debate, which are here clarified. While there is general agreement with the affinity of birds and maniraptorans, the widely accepted phylogeny, advocating derived earth-bound maniraptorans giving rise to more primitive avians (i.e. Archaeopteryx), may be “topsy- turvy.” The current primary debate concerns whether maniraptorans are ancestral or derived within the phylogeny, and whether many maniraptorans and birds form a clade distinct from true theropods. Corollaries of the current scheme show largely terrestrial maniraptoran theropods similar to the Late CretaceousVelociraptor giving rise to avians, and flight originatingvia a terrestrial (cursorial) “gravity-resisted,”
    [Show full text]