Dent Island Golf Course Resort, the Whitsundays

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dent Island Golf Course Resort, the Whitsundays COORDINATOR-GENERAL’S EVALUATION REPORT on the ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for the DENT ISLAND GOLF COURSE RESORT, THE WHITSUNDAYS August 2004 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 1 2 PROJECT DETAILS................................................................................ 2 2.1 The Proponent ..................................................................................................................2 2.2 Project Description ..........................................................................................................2 2.1.1 Golf Course ....................................................................................................................2 2.2.2 Accommodation .............................................................................................................3 2.2.3 Maintenance Facility ......................................................................................................3 2.2.4 Irrigation Pump Shed .....................................................................................................3 2.2.5 Transport & Jetty Facilities ............................................................................................3 2.2.6 Domestic Refuse Collection ..........................................................................................4 2.2.7 Liquid Petroleum Gas ....................................................................................................4 2.2.8 Electrical Power .............................................................................................................4 2.2.9 Telecommunications......................................................................................................4 2.2.10 Potable Water ................................................................................................................4 2.2.11 Irrigation Water...............................................................................................................4 2.2.13 Service Pipeline .............................................................................................................5 2.3 Site Location .....................................................................................................................5 2.3.1 Lot 5 on CP 855596, Parish of Whitsunday..................................................................5 2.3.2 Lot 4 on HR 2019, Parish of Whitsunday......................................................................6 2.3.3 Existing Land Use ..........................................................................................................6 2.4 Rationale for the Dent Island Golf Resort Proposal....................................................6 2.4.1 Need ...............................................................................................................................6 2.4.2 Economic Benefits .........................................................................................................6 2.4.3 Site Benefits ...................................................................................................................7 2.5 Alternatives .......................................................................................................................7 3 THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS ............................................... 8 3.1 Controlled Action & Significant Project Declarations ................................................8 3.2 Review and Refinement of the EIS Terms of Reference.............................................8 3.3 Review of the EIS..............................................................................................................9 3.4 Review of the Supplementary EIS..................................................................................9 3.5 Further Response to Submissions..............................................................................10 3.6 Coordinator-General’s Report ......................................................................................10 3.7 Commonwealth Impact Assessment...........................................................................10 4 ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS............................... 11 4.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................11 4.2 Evidence or Other Material Relied Upon.....................................................................12 4.3 Project Justification.......................................................................................................13 4.4 Conflict with Whitsunday Shire Council Statutory Planning Scheme....................14 4.5 Long-term Phased Development .................................................................................16 4.6 Acid Sulphate Soils........................................................................................................17 4.7 Vegetation Clearance and Disturbance of ‘Of Concern’ Vegetation ......................18 4.8 Whitsunday Shire Council Issues................................................................................19 4.9 Construction Timing ......................................................................................................23 4.10 Marine Landing Facility .................................................................................................23 4.11 Service Pipeline ..............................................................................................................24 4.12 Marine Construction Monitoring Program..................................................................25 4.13 Nutrient Management Issues........................................................................................26 4.14 Issues of Concern to the Mackay Conservation Group............................................26 4.14.1 Economic Justification .................................................................................................26 4.14.2 Alternatives...................................................................................................................27 4.14.3 Weed and Pathogen Control .......................................................................................27 4.14.4 Effluent Pipeline ...........................................................................................................28 4.14.5 Irrigation Water.............................................................................................................28 4.14.6 Visual Impact................................................................................................................28 4.14.7 Non-urban vs Urban concept ......................................................................................28 Dent Island Golf Course Resort EIS – Coordinator-General’s Report – August 2004 ii CONTENTS 4.15 Issues of Concern to Whitsunday Wildlife .................................................................29 4.15.1 Statement of Opposition ..............................................................................................29 4.15.2 The Tourism Threat .....................................................................................................29 4.15.3 Seagrasses, Dugongs & other threatened species....................................................30 4.15.4 Precautionary Principle................................................................................................30 4.15.5 World Heritage Area values.........................................................................................31 4.15.6 Loss of Habitat .............................................................................................................31 5 ASSESSMENT OF THE RELEVANT IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT ON MATTERS OF NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE................. 32 5.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................32 5.2 The Project ......................................................................................................................32 5.3 Places Affected by the Project .....................................................................................32 5.4 Controlling Provisions for the Project ........................................................................32 5.5 Summary of the Project’s Relevant Impacts..............................................................33 5.5.1 World Heritage Values.................................................................................................33 5.5.2 Listed Threatened Species and Communities............................................................41 5.5.3 Listed Migratory Species .............................................................................................44 5.5.4 Protection of the Environment from Actions Involving Commonwealth Land ...........44 5.6 Project Alternatives........................................................................................................45 5.6.1 “No Development” Alternative .....................................................................................46 5.6.2 Alternative Locations for the Proposed Development................................................46 5.6.3 Alternative Development Layouts ...............................................................................46 5.6.3 Alternatives for Site Services Infrastructure ...............................................................46
Recommended publications
  • Subsequent Initial Study of Environmental Impact
    Cayucos Sanitary District 200 Ash Avenue Cayucos CA 93430 www.cayucossd.org • 805-773-4658 Cayucos Sustainable Water Project (CSWP) Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Estero Marine Terminal Ocean Outfall Project Component Subsequent Initial Study of Environmental Impact I. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FORM 1. Project Title: Cayucos Sustainable Water Project Ocean Outfall 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Cayucos Sanitary District 200 Ash Avenue / PO Box 333 Cayucos CA 93430 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: David Foote, c/o firma, (805) 781-9800 4. Project Location: Chevron Estero Marine Terminal 4000 Highway 1, Morro Bay, California 93442 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Cayucos Sanitary District 200 Ash Avenue / PO Box 333 Cayucos CA 93430 6. General Plan Designation: The proposed pipeline tie-in site is designated Agriculture. The effluent pipeline conveyances are within public right-of-way (State Route 1) and Waters of the U.S. and State. 7. Zoning: Agriculture (County) and Open Area I/PD (City of Morro Bay west of State Route 1 and the mean high tide line) Cayucos Sustainable Water Project Ocean Outfall Initial Environmental Study Final January 2019 1 Cayucos Sanitary District 200 Ash Avenue Cayucos CA 93430 www.cayucossd.org • 805-773-4658 Cayucos Sustainable Water Project (CSWP) Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Estero Marine Terminal Ocean Outfall Project Component 8. Project Description & Regulatory and Environmental setting LOCATION AND BACKGROUND The Project consists of the reuse of an existing ocean conveyance pipe for treated effluent disposal from the proposed and permitted Cayucos Sustainable Water Project’s (CSWP) Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) by the Cayucos Sanitary District (CSD).
    [Show full text]
  • Subsea Pipelines Collaboration Cluster Advancing Our Knowledge of Subsea Pipeline Technology to Support the Oil and Gas Industry
    WEALTH FROM OCEANS www.csiro.au Subsea Pipelines Collaboration Cluster Advancing our knowledge of subsea pipeline technology to support the oil and gas industry Final report 2 Executive summary 17 Putting the Cluster’s research into practice 4 Introduction to the Subsea Pipelines Cluster 21 Commissioning experimental equipment 6 Training the offshore for ongoing pipeline pipeline engineers testing in Australia of the future 28 Publications and 10 Scientific and dissemination engineering challenges 34 Key papers 12 Scientific outcomes of the Flagship 46 Awards Collaborative Cluster 48 Keynote presentations, invited lectures and papers 49 Hosting international conference ISFOG 50 The Partners 51 Flagship Collaboration fund 1 Executive summary Offshore subsea pipelines are used to export oil and gas from the field to platform and then from the platform to the mainland. As they are the sole conduit for the hydrocarbons their stability and integrity are of critical economic and environmental importance. More than 80 per cent of Australia’s gas resources exist in deep, remote, offshore areas and being able to realise the full potential of these remote resources relies on the development of economically viable transportation solutions. Technical solutions for Australia’s offshore pipelines must maintain structural integrity and continuous supply of products across hundreds of kilometres of seabed. Such technology is also vital to Australia achieving the vision of “platform free fields”, a CSIRO Wealth from Oceans Flagship initiative. Platform free fields research investigates ways to replace traditional oil and gas platforms with subsea technologies for production of gas resources which may lie as far as 300 km offshore, at a depth greater than 1 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Method of Determining
    Hydrotransport 19 Conference, Sept 24-26, 2014, Denver, USA Options for fixed mechanical sand bypassing at river entrances N.T. Cowper1, L. Nankervis2 and A.D. Thomas3 Slurry Systems Pty Limited, Sydney, Australia 1, [email protected] 2, [email protected] 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Littoral drift of sand along coastlines can result in sand bars forming off ocean entrances causing navigational problems. Conventional management of these sand bars involves regular dredging. Two alternative fixed sand bypassing technologies are considered. The world’s first large scale fixed bypass system at Nerang, Queensland, Australia, is described. Since 1986 it has bypassed around 17 million m3 of sand. The system consists of 10 jet pumps mounted along an offshore jetty. An alternative option, not requiring a jetty, is to use a Submarine Sand Shifter (SSS) buried beneath the sand. The development, pilot plant testing, and operational experience of the Sand Shifter is described. 1. INTRODUCTION Littoral drift is a natural process due to sand being suspended by the energy dissipated in breaking waves. The resulting sand movement is predominantly towards the beach shore. However, when waves strike the beach at an oblique angle there is a shore parallel component of sand movement, or littoral drift. The quantity of littoral drift sand varies depending on wave climate. Depending on the prevailing wave direction, sand bars may build up across river entrances, inhibiting navigation. The conventional solution involves regular dredging of the entrance. A fixed sand bypassing system can provide a more economical alternative. Fixed sand bypassing involves a system to intercept the littoral drift sand before it reaches the entrance and pump it ashore to an on-shore pump station.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrodynamic Forces on Subsea Pipes Due to Orbital Wave Effects
    Hydrodynamic Forces on Subsea Pipes due to Orbital Wave Effects Lisa King Jeremy Leggoe1, Liang Cheng2 1School of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering 2School of Civil and Resource Engineering CEED Client: Woodside Energy Ltd Abstract Pipeline stability design relies on an accurate prediction of the hydrodynamic forces induced by wave and current motion. The motion of wind generated waves is generally orbital, and the orbit paths flatten to an ellipsoid with depth. This leads to the assumption in deepwater that the vertical components of the wave motion tend to zero near the seabed. Due to this simplification wave motion is often modelled as rectilinear for the purposes of analysing on-bottom pipeline stability. This simplification predicts that the magnitudes of the hydrodynamic forces are equal on the forward and reverse half wave cycle. In computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling results have shown the drag force exerted on an on-bottom pipeline was 7% higher than expected on the forward half wave cycle, and 5% lower on the reverse half-wave cycle when waves were modelled as orbital rather than rectilinear. This paper describes CFD modelling to be conducted to investigate this phenomenon and verify the validity of this result. 1. Introduction Pipeline stability is an integral part of the offshore oil and gas industry and in particular is a major challenge for pipeline operators in the Australian North West Shelf (NWS). Due to the severity of the environmental conditions in the NWS, pipeline stabilisation can be a significant project cost, contributing up to 30% of the capital expenditure (Zeitoun et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Shedding Damage Detection of Metal Underwater Pipeline External Anticorrosive Coating by Ultrasonic Imaging Based on HOG + SVM
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Shedding Damage Detection of Metal Underwater Pipeline External Anticorrosive Coating by Ultrasonic Imaging Based on HOG + SVM Xiaobin Hong, Liuwei Huang , Shifeng Gong and Guoquan Xiao * School of Mechanical & Automotive Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China; [email protected] (X.H.); [email protected] (L.H.); [email protected] (S.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Underwater pipelines are the channels for oil transportation in the sea. In the course of pipeline operation, leakage accidents occur from time to time for natural and man-made reasons which result in economic losses and environmental pollution. To avoid economic losses and environ- mental pollution, damage detection of underwater pipelines must be carried out. In this paper, based on the histogram of oriented gradient (HOG) and support vector machine (SVM), a non-contact ultrasonic imaging method is proposed to detect the shedding damage of the metal underwater pipeline external anti-corrosion layer. Firstly, the principle of acoustic scattering characteristics for de- tecting the metal underwater pipelines is introduced. Following this, a HOG+SVM image-extracting algorithm is used to extract the pipeline area from the underwater ultrasonic image. According to the difference of mean gray value in the horizontal direction of the pipeline project area, the shedding Citation: Hong, X.; Huang, L.; Gong, damage parts are identified. Subsequently, taking the metal underwater pipelines with three layers S.; Xiao, G. Shedding Damage of polyethylene outer anti-corrosive coatings as the detection object, an Autonomous Surface Vehicle Detection of Metal Underwater (ASV) for underwater pipelines defect detection is developed to verify the detection effect of the Pipeline External Anticorrosive method.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Excellence Awards
    2020 EXCELLENCE AWARDS Advertising :: Photographic :: Journalism :: Newspapers QUEENSLAND COUNTRY PRESS ASSOCIATION INC. E: [email protected] :: Secretary Phone 0408 165 509 2020 EXCELLENCE MESSAGE FROM OUR PRESIDENT AWARDS Congratulations … Despite the challenges of Covid-19 impacting at the end of March when entries were due, this year’s Excellence Awards again highlighted the tremendous talent which abounds in regional publishing across Queensland. We received over 400 entries across the Advertising, Photography, Journalism and Newspaper categories. The judges were united in compliments about the professionalism and vital contribution our publications are making to our regional communities. It was unfortunate we were unable to fully celebrate our achievements with our highlight presentation night dinner this year, but we have been able to at least recognise the success of our teams and individual winners from the Southern Regions on Queensland, with a presentation luncheon at Toowoomba on Friday, November 6. Congratulations to all who entered, and deserving acknowledgment for the winners, place-getters and highly commended recipients. Maybe we can have an extra celebration at next year’s Awards dinner scheduled to be held at Mercure Brisbane Hotel on May 28. And these Awards herald in a new era for QCPA – with almost 20 new print publications launched recently, and our Association expanding its Online Publisher Membership, providing us over 60 members covering the State. Kind regards, Phill Le Petit President QUEENSLAND COUNTRY PRESS ASSOCIATION INC PO Box 3212, Victoria Point West, Qld., 4165 E: [email protected] :: Phone 0408 165 509 2020 EXCELLENCE AWARDS Advertising Awards JUDGE: RON REEDMAN QUEENSLAND COUNTRY PRESS ASSOCIATION INC.
    [Show full text]
  • DNV-OS-F101: Submarine Pipeline Systems
    OFFSHORE STANDARD DNV-OS-F101 SUBMARINE PIPELINE SYSTEMS 2000 DET NORSKE VERITAS Offshore Standard DNV-OS-F101, 2000 Contents – Page 3 CONTENTS Sec. 1 General................................................................. 10 D 900 Marine growth ................................................................ 23 A. General..................................................................................10 E. External and Internal Pipe Condition ...................................23 A 100 Introduction.....................................................................10 E 100 External operational conditions ...................................... 23 A 200 Objectives .......................................................................10 E 200 Internal installation conditions ....................................... 23 A 300 Scope and Application ....................................................10 E 300 Internal operational conditions ....................................... 23 A 400 Other codes .....................................................................10 F. Documentation......................................................................24 B. Normative References ..........................................................10 F 100 General............................................................................ 24 B 100 Offshore Service Specifications......................................10 F 200 Conceptual and detail engineering.................................. 24 B 200 Offshore Standards .........................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Submarine Cables Through Spatial Separation
    DECEMBER 2014 WORKING GROUP 8 SUBMARINE CABLE ROUTING AND LANDING Final Report – Protection of Submarine Cables Through Spatial Separation The Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council IV Working Group 8 Final Report 1: Spatial Separation December 2014 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 1 BACKGROUND ON CSRIC IV AND WORKING GROUP 8............................ 14 Objectives and Methods ........................................................................................ 14 Membership .......................................................................................................... 15 BACKGROUND ON SUBMARINE CABLES AND THE FCC’S ROLE IN REGULATING THEM ............................................................................................ 17 Submarine Cables Are Critically Important to U.S. National Security and the U.S. Economy ............................................................................................................... 17 Scope and Elements of Submarine Cables............................................................ 19 Complex Federal Regulation ................................................................................ 21 3.3.1 The FCC Functions as the Primary Regulator of Submarine Cables Landing in the United States ......................................................... 21 3.3.2 Other Federal Regulation ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Recent Events
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to COREyou by provided by University of Queensland eSpace AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPER HISTORY GROUP NEWSLETTER ISSN 1443-4962 No. 20 December 2002 Compiled for the ANHG by Rod Kirkpatrick, 13 Sumac Street, Middle Park, Qld, 4074, 07-3279 2279, [email protected] 20.1 COPY DEADLINE AND WEBSITE ADDRESS Deadline for next Newsletter: 31 January 2003. Subscription details appear at end of Newsletter. [Number 1 appeared in October 1999.] See separate file for Australian Newspaper Press Bicentenary Symposium registration form The Newsletter is online through the “Publications” link from the University of Queensland’s School of Journalism & Communication Website at www.sjc.uq.edu.au/ Current Developments: Metro (20.2-27), and Provincial (20.28-38); Newspaper History (20.39-49); Recently Published Books and Articles (20.50-51); and Chronology, 1890-1899 (20.52). CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS: METRO 20.2 CENTRAL COAST DAILY NEWSPAPER BATTLE It’s Fairfax versus News in a daily newspaper battle on the Central Coast of New South Wales: Fairfax, through Newcastle Newspapers, has invaded traditional News turf, serviced by the Cumberland title, the Express Advocate (a merger of the old Central Coast Express and the Wyong Advocate). Fairfax had been working toward the daily for nearly two years and made its first move in July 2001, buying the Sun, a weekly Central Coast free founded in 1987. It launched the Central Coast Sun Weekly in August 2001. Fairfax announced on 25 September that it would launch the daily Central Coast Herald on Saturday, 28 September.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Wire Catalog
    Asia-Pacific Media Pan regional print and television media coverage in Asia. Includes full-text translations into simplified-PRC Chinese, traditional Chinese, Japanese and Korean based on your English language news release. Additional translation services are available. Asia-Pacific Media Balonne Beacon Byron Shire News Clifton Courier Afghanistan Barossa & Light Herald Caboolture Herald Coast Community News News Services Barraba Gazette Caboolture News Coastal Leader Associated Press/Kabul Barrier Daily Truth Cairns Post Coastal Views American Samoa Baw Baw Shire & West Cairns Sun CoastCity Weekly Newspapers Gippsland Trader Caloundra Weekly Cockburn City Herald Samoa News Bay News of the Area Camden Haven Courier Cockburn Gazette Armenia Bay Post/Moruya Examiner Camden-Narellan Advertiser Coffs Coast Advocate Television Bayside Leader Campaspe News Collie Mail Shant TV Beaudesert Times Camperdown Chronicle Coly Point Observer Australia Bega District News Canberra City News Comment News Newspapers Bellarine Times Canning Times Condobolin Argus Albany Advertiser Benalla Ensign Canowindra News Coober Pedy Regional Times Albany Extra Bendigo Advertiser Canowindra Phoenix Cooktown Local News Albert & Logan News Bendigo Weekly Cape York News Cool Rambler Albury Wodonga News Weekly Berwick News Capricorn Coast Mirror Cooloola Advertiser Allora Advertiser Bharat Times Cassowary Coast Independent Coolum & North Shore News Ararat Advertiser Birdee News Coonamble Times Armadale Examiner Blacktown Advocate Casterton News Cooroy Rag Auburn Review
    [Show full text]
  • APN Shaannual Report APN News & Media Annual Report 2010 Report Annual & Media News APN 2010
    APN SHAAnnUAL REPORT APN News & Media Annual Report 2010 2010 90.0 FM 89.4 FM 1503 AM 91.0 FM 97.4 FM 89.4 FM 774 AM 96.8 FM 90.5 FM 90.9 FM 93.8 FM 1584 AM 93.3FM 95.6 FM APN OUTDooR & ADSHEL / BALLIna SHIRE ADVOCATE / BALonnE BEACon / BAY NEWS / BAY OF PLENTY TIMES / BEST OF TIMES / BIG RIGS / BLACKWATER HERALD / BRIBIE WEEKLY / BUDERIM CHRonICLE / BUSH TELEGRapH / BUSpaK (HonG KonG) / BYRon SHIRE NEWS / CabooLTURE NEWS / CaLOUNDRA WEEKLY / CapRICORN CoaST MIRROR / CENTRAL & NORTH BURNETT TIMES / CENTRAL QUEENSLanD NEWS / CENTRAL TELEGRapH / CHB MaIL / CHINCHILLA NEWS anD MURILLA ADVERTISER / CITYLIFE / CLASSIC HITS / CoaSTAL NEWS / CoaSTAL VIEWS / CoDY (HonG KonG) / CooK STRAIT NEWS / CooLooLA ADVERTISER / CooLUM & NORTH SHORE NEWS / CoUNTRY NEWS / CREME / CRUISE / DaILY MERCURY / DaILY POST / DaILY POST WEEKENDER / DaLBY HERALD / DannEVIRKE EVENING NEWS / EaSTERN BAY NEWS / EaSYMIX / FINDA / FLAVA / FRASER CoaST CHRonICLE / GaTTon, LoCKYER anD BRISbanE VaLLEY STAR / GIRLFRIEND / GISboRNE HERALD / GoLD CoaST MaIL / GRabONE / GUARDIan / GUARDIan PALMERSTon NORTH / HaMILTon THIS WEEK / HaSTINGS LEADER / HaWKE’S BAY ToDAY / HERVEY BAY OBSERVER / HoROWHENUA CHRonICLE / InDEPENDENT HERALD / InSITE / ISIS ToWN & CoUNTRY / ISLanD & MaINLanD NEWS / JET MaGAZINE / KapITI NEWS / KaTIKATI ADVERTISER / KaWana WEEKLY / MaCKAY & SaRIna MIDWEEK / MaRooCHY WEEKLY / MINERS MIDWEEK / MIX / NAMboUR WEEKLY / NapIER CoURIER RETUrn TO GROWTH / NEW IDEA / NEW ZEALanD LISTENER / NEW ZEALanD WoMan’S WEEKLY / NEWS ADVERTISER / NEWS-MaIL / NEWSTALKZB / NooSA
    [Show full text]
  • 1 April 2011
    April 2011 UT3 The ONLINE magazine of the Society for Underwater Technology Offshore Engineering Tidal Energy Underwater Equipment 1 UT2 April 2011 Contents Processing Pilot Ready for Testing 4 April 2011 UT2 The magazine of the Offshore Jubarte, Wellstream 6, Gygrid, Tahiti, Gudrun, West Boreas 8, Society for Underwater Technology News Clov, Liuhua, Abkatun, FMC, Cameron/SLB 9, Deepwater Pipelay System 10, McDermott FEED, Brazil, Goliat, Ekofisk, Mariscal Sucre Dragon/Patao, BP 11, Ultra High Flow Injection, Omni- Choke 12 Underwater Flow Assurance Using Radioisotope Technology 14, Pipelines Deepwater Composite Riser 16, Hyperbaric Test Chamber Offshore Engineering Tidal Energy 17, High Pressure Swagelining, Plough in Baltic for Nord- Underwater Equipment Stream, SCAR 18 1 UT2 April 2011 The stern of Saipem’s new vessel showing the pipelay Underwater Subsea UK, RBG 20, Subspection, flexGuard 21, tower. Equipment Laser Scanning 22, HMS Audacious, TOGS, HULS, PAVS 24, Image: IHC Engineering Mojave in China 25, Tsunami Detection, Motion Sensor 26, Cable Survey 27, Cameras and Underwater Digital Stills 28, University of Plymouth Flora Lighting and Fauna Survey, True Lumens 30, Pan and Tilt Camera, April 2011 Aurora 31 Vol 6 No 1 Underwater Multi-Sensor AUV Pipeline Inspection, Integration 32, New Vehicles Markets for the AC-ROV 33, Cougar, CDS 34 2 Sonar 4000m Imaging, UUV, SALT 36, Sonar 294 37 UT Society for Underwater The Tide is Turning 36, MCT, Beluga 9 40, Bio Power 41, Technology Tidal 80 Coleman St The Bourne Alternative, Nexus Positioning, Hales Turbine 42, London EC2R 5BJ Norwegian Ocean Power 43, ORPC Turbine Generator 44, Oyster 2 45, Wave and Tidal 45 +44 (0) 1480 70007 Exhibitions UDT 46 Editor: John Howes [email protected] SUT Advanced Instrumentation for Research in Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine 47, AGM 48, Aberdeen Sub Editor: Michaelagh Shea [email protected] AGM and Dinner 49, AGM Perth 50 US: Published by UT2 Publishing Ltd for and on behalf of the Society for Underwater Stephen Loughlin Technology.
    [Show full text]