UNIDO GEF 6 CC Cabo Verde 9812 Submission.Pdf Download
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
GEF-6 REQUEST FOR PROJECT ENDORSEMENT/APPROVAL PROJECT TYPE: MEDIUM-SIZED PROJECT TYPE OF TRUST FUND: GEF TRUST FUND For more information about GEF, visit TheGEF.org PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION Project Title: Sustainable energy access to manage water resources: Addressing the energy-water nexus Country(ies): Cabo Verde GEF Project ID:1 9812 GEF Agency(ies): UNIDO GEF Agency Project ID: 170001 Other Executing Partner(s): Ministry of Economy and Employment Submission Date: 06/28/2018 (MEE) – Directorate of Energy Services Resubmission Date: 09/24/2018 (DSE); Ministry of Agriculture and Environment2 (MAA); ECOWAS Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (ECREEE); Centre for Renewable Energy and Industrial Maintenance (CERMI), National Agency for Water and Sanitation (ANAS) GEF Focal Area (s): Climate Change Project Duration (Months) 36 Integrated Approach Pilot IAP-Cities IAP-Commodities IAP-Food Security Corporate Program: SGP Name of Parent Program [if applicable] Agency Fee ($) 169,241 A. FOCAL AREA STRATEGY FRAMEWORK AND OTHER PROGRAM STRATEGIES3 (in $) Focal Area Trust Focal Area Outcomes GEF Co- Objectives/Programs Fund Project financing Financing CCM-1 Program 1 Outcome A: Accelerated adoption of innovative GEFTF 1,781,484 14,949,551 technologies and management practices for GHG emission reductions and carbon sequestration Total project costs 1,781,484 14,949,551 B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Project Objective: To catalyze market-based integration of renewable energy and energy efficiency (sustainable energy) technologies in water resource management (in $) Project Components/ Financing Trust GEF Confirmed 4 Project Outcomes Project Outputs Programs Type Fund Project Co- Financing financing 1. Establishment of a TA 1.1 Energy-water 1.1.1. National platform GEFTF 51,300 231,300 1 Project ID number remains the same as the assigned PIF number. 2 The Ministry of Agriculture and Environment is the former Ministry of Rural Development. 3 When completing Table A, refer to the excerpts on GEF 6 Results Frameworks for GETF, LDCF and SCCF and CBIT programming directions. 4 Financing type can be either investment or technical assistance. 1 policy and nexus and Energy to discuss synergies institutional Services Companies between sustainable framework conducive (ESCOs) approach energy system and to the promotion of integrated in relevant water resource energy-water nexus national policies and management established approach and the regulations 1.1.2. creation of Energy Recommendations to Services Companies integrate the gender (ESCOs) dimension into energy- water initiatives prepared and presented to decision makers 1.1.3. Recommendations on how to improve the policy and regulatory environment to promote ESCOs approach in sustainable energy- water resource management projects developed and presented to decision makers 2. Build capacity to TA 2.1 Local capacity on 2.1.1. Training material GEFTF 150,000 440,000 support the market energy-water nexus on how to integrate RE integration of RE and and ESCOs approach and EE technologies in EE technologies in enhanced water management water resources system produced management 2.1.2. Training material on development and management of ESCOs and entrepreneurship produced 2.1.3. CERMI’s staff and other institution’s Staff trained using the programmes and modules produced in Output 2.1.1 and Output 2.1.2 on a train-the- trainer basis 2.1.4. 10 training sessions (5 for each module) are conducted by CERMI trained staff 3. Demonstration and Inv 3.1. Private 3.1.1. ESCOs approach GEFTF 1,358,231 13,970,251 scaling up investment investment in projects and tailored financial in projects focused on addressing the mechanism developed the use of RE and EE energy-water nexus and used to support in water resource increased – demonstration projects management systems implementation of at integrating RE and EE least 3.6MW of in water pumping and sustainable energy- desalination systems to water investment achieve around 1.6 MW projects of installed capacity 3.1.2. Investment projects using ESCOs approach and tailored 2 financial mechanism implemented to reach about 2MW of installed capacity 3.1.3. Workshop, seminars and exposure visits organized to discuss and promote public private investment partnerships to accelerate the deployment of sustainable energy- water nexus projects 4. Monitoring and TA 4.1. Continuous 4.1.1 Terminal GEFTF 60,000 58,000 evaluation monitoring and evaluation executed evaluation (M&E) of 4.1.2. Project’s progress the implementation of monitored, documented the GEF/UNIDO and recommended project conducted in actions formulated accordance with established GEF and UNIDO procedures and guidelines Subtotal 1,619,531 14,699,551 Project Management Cost (PMC)5 (select) 161,953 250,000 Total project costs 1,781,484 14,949,551 C. CONFIRMED SOURCES OF CO-FINANCING FOR THE PROJECT BY NAME AND BY TYPE Please include evidence for co-financing for the project with this form. Sources of Co-financing Name of Co-financier Type of Cofinancing Amount ($) Implementing Agency UNIDO Grant 45,000 Implementing Agency UNIDO In-Kind 150,000 Recipient Government Ministry of Agriculture and Environment Grant 120,000 Recipient Government Ministry of Agriculture and Environment In-kind 1,880,000 Recipient Government Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Energy Grant 31,000 Recipient Government Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Energy In-Kind 774,800 Government Institutions CERMI Grant 160,000 Government Institutions CERMI In-Kind 180,000 Government Institutions CVTradeInvest Grant 1,500 Government Institutions CVTradeInvest In-Kind 2,500 Other Multilateral ECREEE Grant 561,000 Agencies Other Multilateral ECREEE In-Kind 143,500 Agencies 5 For GEF Project Financing up to $2 million, PMC could be up to 10% of the subtotal; above $2 million, PMC could be up to 5% of the subtotal. PMC should be charged proportionately to focal areas based on focal area project financing amount in Table D below. 3 Private Sector6 Resolute Marine Energy Equity 5,509,000 Private Sector MASCARA Equity 3,227,800 Private Sector XS2SOLAR Equity 879,800 Private Sector XS2SOLAR Equity 449,280 Private Sector Elemental Water Makers (EWM) Equity 528,000 Private Sector ADPM Equity 154,368 Private Sector APN SA Equity 67,196 Government Institution Municipality of Ribeira Grande de Santo Equity 84,807 Antão Total Co-financing 14,949,551 D. TRUST FUND RESOURCES REQUESTED BY AGENCY(IES), COUNTRY(IES), FOCAL AREA AND THE PROGRAMMING OF FUNDS (in $) GEF Trust Country Programming of Focal Area GEF Project Agency Fee a) Total Agency Fund Name/Global Funds 2 Financing (a) (b) (c)=a+b UNIDO GEF Cabo Verde Climate (select as applicable) 1,781,484 169,241 1,950,725 TF Change Total Grant Resources 1,781,484 169,241 1,950,725 a ) Refer to the Fee Policy for GEF Partner Agencies 6 Further co-financing is expected to be mobilized from private sector entities and/or project beneficieries during project implementation after CEO endorsement in-line with the GEF Co-financing Policy GEF/C.46/09. 4 E. PROJECT’S TARGET CONTRIBUTIONS TO GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS7 Provide the expected project targets as appropriate. Corporate Results Replenishment Targets Project Targets 1. Maintain globally significant biodiversity Improved management of landscapes and hectares and the ecosystem goods and services that seascapes covering 300 million hectares it provides to society 2. Sustainable land management in 120 million hectares under sustainable land hectares production systems (agriculture, management rangelands, and forest landscapes) 3. Promotion of collective management of Water-food-ecosystems security and Number of freshwater transboundary water systems and conjunctive management of surface and basins implementation of the full range of policy, groundwater in at least 10 freshwater basins; legal, and institutional reforms and investments contributing to sustainable 20% of globally over-exploited fisheries (by Percent of fisheries, by use and maintenance of ecosystem volume) moved to more sustainable levels volume services 4. Support to transformational shifts 750 million tons of CO2e mitigated (include both Direct: 126,577 metric tons towards a low-emission and resilient direct and indirect) of CO2e development path Indirect: 477,398 metric tons of CO2e Total: 603,975 metric tons of CO2e 5. Increase in phase-out, disposal and Disposal of 80,000 tons of POPs (PCB, obsolete metric tons reduction of releases of POPs, ODS, pesticides) mercury and other chemicals of global concern Reduction of 1000 tons of Mercury metric tons Phase-out of 303.44 tons of ODP (HCFC) ODP tons 6. Enhance capacity of countries to Development and sectoral planning frameworks Number of Countries: implement MEAs (multilateral integrate measurable targets drawn from the environmental agreements) and MEAs in at least 10 countries mainstream into national and sub-national Functional environmental information systems Number of Countries: policy, planning financial and legal frameworks are established to support decision-making in at least 10 countries F. DOES THE PROJECT INCLUDE A “NON-GRANT” INSTRUMENT? NO (If non-grant instruments are used, provide an indicative calendar of expected reflows to your Agency and to the GEF/LDCF/SCCF/CBIT Trust Fund) in Annex D. PART II: PROJECT JUSTIFICATION A. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE PROJECT DESIGN WITH THE ORIGINAL PIF8 During the PPG phase the set-up of the project was further detailed and has been adapted in accordance with the findings and priorities of the country. Even though, the structure and nature of the current project does not have significant changes if compared with the project design at PIF level, the table below describes the main differences between the CEO Endorsement document and the approved PIF. 7 Update the applicable indicators provided at PIF stage. Progress in programming against these targets for the projects per the Corporate Results Framework in the GEF-6 Programming Directions, will be aggregated and reported during mid-term and at the conclusion of the replenishment period.