5 the Socio-Economic Environment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

5 the Socio-Economic Environment Public Disclosure Authorized Government of the Republic of Malawi Ministry of Water Development and Irrigation National Water Development Programme Public Disclosure Authorized Independent Environmental Impact Assessment for the Upgraded Kamuzu Barrage Final Resettlement Action Plan Volume 1: Main Report Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized February 2014 Independent Environmental Impact Assessment for the Upgraded Kamuzu Barrage – Final RAP Volume 1: Main Report Table of Contents ............................................................................................... i Abbreviations ................................................................................................. viii Executive Summary .......................................................................................... x Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... xviii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope and Objectives of the Resettlement Action Plan ............................................2 1.3 Report Layout ............................................................................................................3 2 Project Description ................................................................................... 5 2.1 Location and Justification ..........................................................................................5 2.2 Description of Proposed Works .................................................................................5 2.3 Operation and Maintenance Activities .......................................................................6 2.4 Area of Project Impact ...............................................................................................6 2.5 Project Implementation .............................................................................................. 7 3 Methodology ........................................................................................... 10 3.1 Site Visits .................................................................................................................10 3.2 Literature Review .....................................................................................................10 3.3 Consultation with Stakeholders ...............................................................................10 3.4 Stakeholder Consultation and Participation Methodology .......................................11 3.4.1 Public and Community Meetings ..................................................................12 3.4.2 Individual Consultation .................................................................................12 3.4.3 Focus Group Meetings .................................................................................12 3.4.4 Socio- Economic Survey ..............................................................................13 3.4.5 Compensation and Resettlement Assessment and Survey ......................... 15 3.4.6 Mapping and Database of Affected Persons and Assets ............................. 16 4 Legal and Policy Framework ................................................................. 17 4.1 National Legislation and Practice ............................................................................17 4.1.1 The National Constitution .............................................................................17 4.1.2 National Policies and Acts ............................................................................17 4.1.2.1 Environment Management Act, 1996 and Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines, 1997 .....................................................17 4.1.2.2 Land Act (1965) ...........................................................................18 4.1.2.3 The Lands Acquisition Act (1971) ............................................... 18 4.1.2.4 The Malawi National Land Policy (2002) ..................................... 18 4.1.2.5 The Employment Act (2000) and Labour Relations Act (1996) .. 19 4.1.2.6 Town and Country Planning Act (1990) ...................................... 19 Independent EIA for the Upgraded Kamuzu Barrage: Final RAP Volume 1, February 2014 i 4.1.2.7 The Monuments and Relics Act (1991) .......................................19 4.1.2.8 The Public Roads Act (1962) ...................................................... 19 4.2 International Standards ............................................................................................19 4.2.1 International Agreements and Conventions .................................................19 4.2.1.1 The Millennium Development Goals ........................................... 20 4.2.1.2 Agenda 21 ...................................................................................20 4.2.2 International Guidelines and Procedures .....................................................21 4.2.2.1 World Bank ..................................................................................21 4.3 Project Policy Principles and Guidelines for Involuntary Resettlement ................... 22 5 The Socio-Economic Environment ....................................................... 25 5.1 Administrative and Geographic Context ..................................................................25 5.1.1 Geographical Context ...................................................................................25 5.1.2 Administrative Context .................................................................................25 5.2 Socio-Economic Profile of Project Area ...................................................................25 5.2.1 Demography .................................................................................................25 5.2.1.1 Population .................................................................................... 25 5.2.1.2 Age and Gender Distribution ....................................................... 26 5.2.1.3 Social Composition ......................................................................27 5.2.1.4 Gender and Educational Attainment ........................................... 30 5.2.2 Settlement ....................................................................................................30 5.2.3 Housing ........................................................................................................32 5.2.4 Household Assets Owned ............................................................................ 33 5.2.5 Basic Household Facilities ...........................................................................34 5.2.6 Infrastructure, Services and Movement Patterns ......................................... 36 5.2.7 Land Use ......................................................................................................38 5.2.8 Livelihoods and Employment .......................................................................43 5.2.9 Impacts of Lakes Malawi and Malombe and Shire River on Households .... 48 5.2.10 Health Profile ................................................................................................50 5.2.10.1 Health Facilities ...........................................................................50 5.2.10.2 Common Diseases ......................................................................51 5.2.11 Cultural Heritage ..........................................................................................52 5.2.12 Key Information from Stakeholder Consultations and Participation ............. 52 6 Potential Impacts .................................................................................... 53 6.1 Overall Project Impacts ............................................................................................53 6.1.1 Positive Impacts ...........................................................................................53 6.1.1.1 Employment Opportunities ..........................................................53 6.1.1.2 Economic Development ..............................................................53 6.1.1.3 Improved Infrastructure and Service Provision ........................... 53 6.1.2 Negative Impacts ..........................................................................................54 6.1.2.1 Construction Areas ......................................................................54 6.1.2.2 Upstream of the Barrage .............................................................55 Independent EIA for the Upgraded Kamuzu Barrage: Final RAP Volume 1, February 2014 ii 6.1.2.3 Downstream of the Barrage ........................................................56 6.2 Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement ..........................................................58 6.2.1 Land and Property Impacts ..........................................................................59 6.2.2 Livelihood Impacts ........................................................................................59 6.2.3 Impact on Crops ...........................................................................................62 6.2.4 Impacts on Access to Services ....................................................................62 6.2.5 Poor and Vulnerable Groups and Heritage Items ........................................62 6.2.5.1 Impacts on Poor and Vulnerable Groups ...................................
Recommended publications
  • Rp13110rp0v10p06b0afr0rp
    Public Disclosure Authorized Government of Malawi World Bank Irrigation, Rural Livelihoods and Agriculture Development Project Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Resettlement Policy Framework Volume 1: Social Impact Assessment Final Report March 2005 Public Disclosure Authorized Ministry of Agriculture Capital City, Lilongwe 3 Irrigation, Rural Livelihoods and Agriculture Development Project Resettlement Policy Framework Volume 1: Social Impact Assessment Final Report Proponent: The Principal Secretary Ministry of Agriculture P.O. Box 30134 Capital City Lilongwe 3 Tel: (265) 1789033 (265) 1789252 Fax: (265) 1789218 (265) 1788738 Consultant: Kempton Consultancy Services Plot No. 4/354D Shire Limited Building P.O. Box 1048 Lilongwe. Malawi. Mobile: (265) 9958136 ii Table of Contents Table of Contents----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x LIST OF ACRONYMS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------xi LIST OF TABLES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------xii 1.0 Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Community-Based ART Service Model Linking Female Sex Workers to HIV Care and Treatment in Blantyre and Mangochi, Malawi
    Population Council Knowledge Commons HIV and AIDS Social and Behavioral Science Research (SBSR) 1-1-2021 Assessment of community-based ART service model linking female sex workers to HIV care and treatment in Blantyre and Mangochi, Malawi Lung Vu Population Council Brady Zieman Population Council Adamson Muula Vincent Samuel Lyson Tenthani Population Council See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-hiv Part of the Public Health Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Vu, Lung, Brady Zieman, Adamson Muula, Vincent Samuel, Lyson Tenthani, David Chilongozi, Simon Sikwese, Grace Kumwenda, and Scott Geibel. 2021. "Assessment of community-based ART service model linking female sex workers to HIV care and treatment in Blantyre and Mangochi, Malawi," Project SOAR Final Report. Washington, DC: USAID | Project SOAR. This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Population Council. Authors Lung Vu, Brady Zieman, Adamson Muula, Vincent Samuel, Lyson Tenthani, David Chilongozi, Simon Sikwese, Grace Kumwenda, and Scott Geibel This report is available at Knowledge Commons: https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-hiv/ 551 Assessment of Community-based ART Service Model Linking Female Sex report Workers to HIV Care and Treatment in Blantyre and Mangochi, Malawi Lung Vu Brady Zieman Adamson Muula Vincent Samuel Lyson Tenthani David Chilongozi Simon Sikwese Grace Kumwenda JANUARY 2021 JANUARY Scott Geibel Project SOAR Population Council 4301 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 280 Washington, D.C. 20008 USA Tel: +1 202 237 9400 Fax: +1 202 237 8410 projsoar.org Project SOAR (Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA-A-14-00060) is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
    [Show full text]
  • Registered Voters
    Region Name District Name Constituency Name Ward Name Center Name Center Code 2014 2018 Female Male Number Of % Voter % Voter Male Youths Female Total Youths % Youth to Transfers In Transfers Registration Projected Registrants Registrants Registrants Registration Registration Youths Total Out Figures Figures to 2014 to 2018 Registrants Projections Northern Chitipa Chitipa Central Yamba Ifumbo School 01077 821 913 439 362 801 97.56% 87.73% 205 260 465 58.05% 5 13 Region Chinunkha School 01078 658 732 255 222 477 72.49% 65.16% 126 139 265 55.56% 5 8 Chitipa Model School 01079 1,414 1,572 745 615 1,360 96.18% 86.51% 332 422 754 55.44% 19 8 Ipulukutu School 01080 662 736 215 177 392 59.21% 53.26% 101 124 225 57.40% 2 2 Isyalikira School 01081 1,491 1,658 887 704 1,591 106.71% 95.96% 410 552 962 60.47% 12 7 Kasinde School 01082 705 784 298 231 529 75.04% 67.47% 123 154 277 52.36% 4 0 Mwakalomba School 01083 241 268 141 107 248 102.90% 92.54% 48 74 122 49.19% 2 2 Ichinga School 01084 683 759 369 297 666 97.51% 87.75% 145 209 354 53.15% 1 1 Katutula School 01085 1,307 1,453 588 461 1,049 80.26% 72.20% 210 303 513 48.90% 7 7 Kawale School 01086 2,297 2,554 723 739 1,462 63.65% 57.24% 421 403 824 56.36% 28 17 Msangano School 01087 390 434 196 156 352 90.26% 81.11% 80 106 186 52.84% 4 0 Chitipa Community Hall 01088 3,018 3,356 1,815 1,874 3,689 122.23% 109.92% 1,013 1,079 2,092 56.71% 31 57 Lwakwa School 01089 861 957 457 362 819 95.12% 85.58% 167 209 376 45.91% 2 2 Chimwemwe School 01090 924 1,027 472 387 859 92.97% 83.64% 206 237 443 51.57% 3
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report 2017
    Malawi Country Oice Summary Report 2017 UNFPA in Malawi aims to promote universal access to sexual and reproductive health, realize reproductive rights, and reduce maternal mortality to accelerate progress on the agenda of the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development, to improve the lives of women, adolescents and youth, enabled by population dynamics, human rights and gender equality. Malawi Country Office Summary Report 2017 UNFPA supports programmes in thematic areas of: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights including Family Planning, Maternal Health, HIV and AIDS, and Fistula Population and Development Humanitarian Emergencies Gender Equality and GBV including Ending Child Marriages These are delivered by working with the Ministry of Health and Population; Ministry of Finance, Economic Planning and Development; Ministry of Labour, Youth and Manpower Development; Ministry of Gender, Children, Disability and Social Welfare among other government institutions and non-state actors. While the Government Ministries implement some of the strategic activities on policy and guidelines, most of the community and facility based interventions at the service delivery level are implemented by District Councils and local non-governmental organizations. 1 UNFPA Malawi strategically supports seven districts of Chiradzulu, Salima, Mangochi, Mchinji, Dedza, Chikhwawa and Nkhata-bay. Nkhata Bay Northern Region Central Region Southern Region Salima Mchinji Mangochi Dedza Chikhwawa Chiradzulu Impact districts
    [Show full text]
  • Public Expenditure Review of the WASH Sector in Malawi
    PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW OF THE Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Sector of Malawi February 2020 WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE SECTOR MALAWI FEBRUARY 2020 i PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW © UNICEF/2016/Sebastian Rich © UNICEF/2016/Sebastian ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Appreciation goes to all individuals and institutions that Muchabaiwa, Patrick Okuni, Nkandu David Chilombo, Alessandro contributed to the development of this PER. The Government Ramella Pezza, Kelvin Tapiwa Mutambirwa and Chimwemwe would like to thank staff from several Ministries, Departments Nyimba for the technical and logistical support. and Agencies (MDAs) who were involved in this PER. Specifically, appreciation goes to staff from the M&E Division under the The Government would also like to deeply thank the Oxford Economic Planning and Development (EP&D) of the Ministry of Policy Management (OPM) consultancy team – comprising of Finance; the Water Supplies Department under the Ministry of Nick Hall (team leader), Zach White (project manager), Tuntufye Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development (MoAIWD); and Mwalyambwire, and Tim Cammack for providing technical the Environmental Health Department under the Ministry of support that enabled the production of this PER. Also the OPM Health and Population (MoHP). staff that worked in the background to make this exercise a success are appreciated. Sincere gratitude goes to the following Government staff – Sophie Kang’oma, Victoria Geresomo, Richard Jack Kajombo, Gringoster The analysis in this PER draws on scores of interviews with Kajomba and Stevier Kaiyatsa from the EP&D; Emma Mbalame, district staff, with a list of those interviewed or consulted Bibo Charles Yatina and Gertrude Makuti Botomani from the provided in Annex I. The Government is extremely thankful to all MoAIWD; Allone Ganizani, Holystone Kafanikhale, Samuel district for their inputs.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Forecasting of Engraulicypris Sardella (Usipa) Yields from Mangochi Artisanal Fisheries of Lake Malawi Using Holt Exponential Smoothing Method
    Modeling and Forecasting of Engraulicypris sardella (Usipa) Yields from Mangochi Artisanal Fisheries of Lake Malawi using Holt Exponential Smoothing Method Mexford Mulumpwa1,2*, Wilson Jere2, Tasokwa Kakota3, Austin Mtethiwa2 & Jeremiah Kang’ombe2 1Department of Fisheries, Monkey Bay Fisheries Research Station, P.O. Box 27, Monkey Bay, Malawi. 2Aquaculture and Fisheries Sciences Department, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Bunda Campus, P. O. Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi. 3Department of Basic Sciences, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Bunda Campus, P. O. Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi. *Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] Abstract This study was aimed at modelling and forecasting Engraulicypris sardella (Usipa) species yield from artisanal fishery on Lake Malawi in Mangochi District. The study was based on secondary count time series data on fish catches during the years of 1976 through 2012 provided by Fisheries Research Unit of the Department of Fisheries in Malawi. The study considered Holt exponential smoothing method to select an appropriate stochastic model for forecasting the Usipa species yields. Appropriate model was chosen based on Holt‟s exponential parameters α (alpha) and β (beta) Box – Ljung statistics and distribution of residual errors among others were estimated. The Holt‟s exponential smoothing method showed that the artisanal fishery landings of Usipa would increase to 22,849.4 tonnes in year 2022 which is 2,135.76 tonnes more than the landings in the year 2010 of 20,713.64 tonnes assuming that the biological and ecological factors remain the same. The forecast mean for Usipa is predicted to be 22,849.4 tonnes through the year 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Status & Results
    The World Bank Report No: ISR16677 Implementation Status & Results Malawi Strengthening Safety Nets Systems - MASAF IV (P133620) Operation Name: Strengthening Safety Nets Systems - MASAF IV (P133620) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 2 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 17-Nov-2014 Country: Malawi Approval FY: 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Investment Project Financing Implementing Agency(ies): MALAWI THIRD SOCIAL ACTION FUND Key Dates Board Approval Date 18-Dec-2013 Original Closing Date 30-Jun-2018 Planned Mid Term Review Date 30-Apr-2016 Last Archived ISR Date 03-Mar-2014 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 16-Sep-2014 Revised Closing Date 30-Jun-2018 Actual Mid Term Review Date Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The Project Development Objective of the proposed project is to strengthen Malawi’s social safety net delivery systems and coordination across programs. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Productive Safety Nets 28.80 Systems and Capacity Building 2.00 Project Management 2.00 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Overall Risk Rating Substantial Substantial Public Disclosure Authorized Implementation Status Overview Following Project approval in December 2013, government procedures related to the authorization to borrow took longer than expected and the project became effective only in September 2014. On October 6, 2014 a project launch workshop was organized in Lilongwe by the Local Development Fund-Technical Support Team (LDF-TST).
    [Show full text]
  • Malawi Newborn Health Program Final Evaluation Report
    Malawi Newborn Health Program Final Evaluation Report National Level - Expanded Impact Project (with learning activities in the districts of Chitipa, Dowa, Thyolo, Mzimba, Mchinji) Cooperative Agreement No.: GHS-A-00-06-00016-00 30 September 2006 – 30 September 2011 Submitted to USAID/GH/HIDN/NUT/CSHGP December 31, 2011 by: Save the Children Federation, Inc. 54 Wilton Road, Westport, CT 06880 Telephone: (203) 221-4000 - Fax: (203) 221-4056 Contact Persons: Eric A. Swedberg, Senior Director, Child Health and Nutrition Carmen Weder, Associate Director, Department of Health & Nutrition Principal writers and editors: John Murray, External Team Leader; Karen Z. Waltensperger, Senior Advisor, Health-Africa Region; Nathalie Gamache, Associate Director, Country Support & Coordination, Saving Newborn Lives; Evelyn Zimba, Malawi Newborn Health Program Manager; Joby George, Senior Health Program Manager; Sharon Lake-Post, Editorial Consultant This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Save the Children and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Page Acronyms 3 A. PRELIMINARY INFORMATION 5 B. OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT STRUCTURE AND IMPLEMENTATION 9 C. EVALUATION ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND LIMITATIONS 13 D. DATA QUALITY AND USE 14 E. PRESENTATION OF PROJECT RESULTS 17 F. DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS 20 G. DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL FOR SUSTAINED OUTCOMES, CONTRIBUTION TO SCALE,
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Malawi National Park Fish Conservation Project Report on Scoping Visit 14Th – 19Th September 2020
    Lake Malawi National Park Fish Conservation Project Report on Scoping Visit 14th – 19th September 2020 Empowering communities to achieve a sustainable future by providing a hand UP, not a hand out. Company Reg No. 4823686 England • UK Reg Charity Nos. 1103256 and SC043082 www.rippleafrica.org US Registered 501(c)3 Charity • EIN 26-2059213 1st October 2020 Lake Malawi National Park Fish Conservation Project th th Report on Scoping Visit 14 – 19 September 2020 Proposed Outcome The visit was tasked with finding answers to the following questions: 1. Are the critical protected areas actually being effectively protected within the National Park? 2. How do Fisheries and Parks want to see the area protected more effectively? 3. What other species are also under threat here? There is a lot of attention on cichlids, but by increasing stocks of other species that are more popular to eat, pressure on these could be eased. 4. Do fishing communities feel that they would benefit from enforcing regulations more effectively within the protected area? 5. Are fishing communities actually prepared to work in partnership with Fisheries and Parks to protect fish stocks? Without this, there would be little point in trying to introduce Ripple Africa’s approach here. 6. How can existing Beach Village Committees be more effective in their activities? 7. Where are the key areas in need of protection? 8. How might a cost effective and sustainable monitoring system work? Ripple Africa was asked to produce a report in partnership with Parks and Wildlife and Fisheries
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Contestations Over Natural Resources in the Lower Tchiri Valley in Malawi, C.1850-1960
    A history of contestations over natural resources in the Lower Tchiri Valley in Malawi, c.1850-1960. by George Berson Diston Jawali Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof Sandra Swart March 2015 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am authorship owner thereof (unless to the extent explicitly otherwise stated) and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Signature: .................................................... Date: ........................................... Copyright © 2015 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract This study explores hunting in the Lower Tchiri Valley as an arena in which African and white hunting interests as well as conservation policies precipitated insurgence and accommodation, collaboration and conflict. Precolonial Magololo hunters, having supplanted Mang’anja hunting as a result of the superiority of their hunting technology by 1861, found themselves in competition with white sport hunters over game animals. Unequal power relations between the Magololo hunters and the white hunters, who formed part of the colonial administration in Nyasaland from the 1890s, saw the introduction of game laws that led to wild animals and their sanctuaries becoming contested terrains. Colonial officials and some whites enjoyed privileges in hunting game whose declining populations were blamed on Africans in general and the Magololo in particular. Some Africans and certain whites devised hunting strategies that brought them into conflict with the colonial state.
    [Show full text]
  • Map District Site Balaka Balaka District Hospital Balaka Balaka Opd
    Map District Site Balaka Balaka District Hospital Balaka Balaka Opd Health Centre Balaka Chiendausiku Health Centre Balaka Kalembo Health Centre Balaka Kankao Health Centre Balaka Kwitanda Health Centre Balaka Mbera Health Centre Balaka Namanolo Health Centre Balaka Namdumbo Health Centre Balaka Phalula Health Centre Balaka Phimbi Health Centre Balaka Utale 1 Health Centre Balaka Utale 2 Health Centre Blantyre Bangwe Health Centre Blantyre Blantyre Adventist Hospital Blantyre Blantyre City Assembly Clinic Blantyre Chavala Health Centre Blantyre Chichiri Prison Clinic Blantyre Chikowa Health Centre Blantyre Chileka Health Centre Blantyre Blantyre Chilomoni Health Centre Blantyre Chimembe Health Centre Blantyre Chirimba Health Centre Blantyre Dziwe Health Centre Blantyre Kadidi Health Centre Blantyre Limbe Health Centre Blantyre Lirangwe Health Centre Blantyre Lundu Health Centre Blantyre Macro Blantyre Blantyre Madziabango Health Centre Blantyre Makata Health Centre Lunzu Blantyre Makhetha Clinic Blantyre Masm Medi Clinic Limbe Blantyre Mdeka Health Centre Blantyre Mlambe Mission Hospital Blantyre Mpemba Health Centre Blantyre Ndirande Health Centre Blantyre Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital Blantyre South Lunzu Health Centre Blantyre Zingwangwa Health Centre Chikwawa Chapananga Health Centre Chikwawa Chikwawa District Hospital Chikwawa Chipwaila Health Centre Chikwawa Dolo Health Centre Chikwawa Kakoma Health Centre Map District Site Chikwawa Kalulu Health Centre, Chikwawa Chikwawa Makhwira Health Centre Chikwawa Mapelera Health Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Study on Rural Electrification in Malawi Final Report
    No. JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS (MONREA) DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AFFAIRS (DOE) REPUBLIC OF MALAWI MASTER PLAN STUDY ON RURAL ELECTRIFICATION IN MALAWI FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT MARCH 2003 TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER SERVICES CO., LTD. MPN NOMURA RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LTD. JR 03-023 Contents 0 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 1 1 Background and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Objectives............................................................................................................................ 8 2 Process of Master Plan................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Basic guidelines .................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Identification of electrification sites ................................................................................. 10 2.3 Data and information collection........................................................................................ 10 2.4 Prioritization of electrification sites.................................................................................
    [Show full text]