DOCSLIB.ORG

Dying of Mesothelioma and Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer (M/ARLC) in the Latrobe Valley, Victoria, Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dying of Mesothelioma and Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer (M/ARLC) in the Latrobe Valley, Victoria, Australia ORIGINAL RESEARCH A very public death: dying of mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer (M/ARLC) in the Latrobe Valley, Victoria, Australia SF Lee 1, MM O’Connor 1, Y Chapman 1, V Hamilton 2, K Francis 1 1School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia 2Gippsland Asbestos Related Diseases Support Inc, Moe, Victoria, Australia Submitted: 25 February 2009; Revised: 8 May 2009; Published: 25 August 2009 Lee SF, O’Connor MM, Chapman Y, Hamilton V, Francis K A very public death: dying of mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer (M/ARLC) in the Latrobe Valley, Victoria, Australia Rural and Remote Health 9: 1183. (Online), 2009 Available from: http://www.rrh.org.au A B S T R A C T Introduction: It is anticipated that in Australia the number of cases of mesothelioma will continue to rise significantly over the next 15 years with power station workers having a risk second only to asbestos mill workers. Mesothelioma responds poorly to treatment and is almost always fatal, yet there have been few studies related to the palliative care needs of this diagnostic group and none focussing on the Latrobe Valley, Victoria, Australia. The aims of this pilot study were to identify common issues and to explore the needs and experiences of people with mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer (M/ARLC), their carers, and service providers in the Latrobe Valley community, in particular in relation to palliative care. Methods: The study employed a case study design using in-depth interviews, media reports, local authority and employer reports and historical data, which were content analysed. The constant comparative method was used to identify common themes and issues. Results: The Latrobe Valley is the fourth largest regional area in Victoria. The electricity industry and brown coal mining at the town of Yallourn were the primary industries. Former power workers are contracting mesothelioma at a rate seven times the national average. A total of 13 participants from the Latrobe Valley were interviewed, comprising five key stakeholders who were local legal and healthcare providers; two people who had been diagnosed with mesothelioma; and six family carers. Most people with M/ARLC in the Latrobe Valley are older males who were employed by the electricity and related industries, while their carers © SF Lee, MM O’Connor, Y Chapman, V Hamilton, K Francis, 2009. A licence to publish this material has been given to ARHEN http://www.rrh.org.au 1 are mostly female wives and daughters. There were three major themes identified in the data: illness experience; carer and family roles; and services and service gaps. The results indicated that those with M/ARLC and their families experience diagnosis and treatment as being filled with unpredictability and fear. The older males with M/ARLC were characterised as stoic and reluctant to seek help, contributing to a delayed diagnosis. However, their rural health services compounded these delays because of the unpredictability of health professional availability. Although there are some cancer treatment and legal services locally, people with M/ARLC are often required to travel to metropolitan services for care and advice. The effort and time required to seek compensation at a time of declining health was particularly burdensome. Participants expressed the tension between feelings of loyalty to their employers and anger at the perceived betrayal of the same employers, who were reported to have ignored asbestos warnings. Access to palliative care was delayed by a discomfort associated with acknowledgement of dying and resulted in poor symptom control and a lack of support to significantly burdened carers. People with M/ARLC have a strong desire to die at home but issues of rurality, isolation and late referral to palliative care services often complicate their care. Conclusions: This pilot study explored the needs of people with M/ARLC in the Latrobe Valley and the results indicated that their experience is complicated by unpredictability, lack of information and the rural location. The study recommended that innovative models of care be investigated to improve communication and continuity of care in the Latrobe Valley community, in addition to the barriers and enablers to local health and legal service provision. Further, the study indicates that a comprehensive education strategy for local health providers and community members, and strategies to prevent and manage volunteer and health professional burnout are needed. Key words: asbestos, compensation, lung cancer, mesothelioma, palliative care, rural health. Introduction study was the Latrobe Valley, Victoria, Australia. The Latrobe Valley is located at the gateway to the Gippsland area in the south east of the state of Victoria in Australia. Asbestos was used extensively from the 1800s in industrial The population of 72 000 residents living in the Latrobe applications and as early as the 1900s, workers in the Valley regional area 3 grew around the development of the asbestos industry were reported to be dying of respiratory electricity industry and the mining of brown coal at the town diseases. However it was many years before the publicity of Yallourn. Power station workers were exposed to asbestos surrounding the risk to workers of asbestos exposure resulted during construction of the power stations, as well as in the in the removal of asbestos from industry. building of their own homes 4. Former power workers in the Latrobe Valley are reported to be contracting mesothelioma Asbestos related lung disease can take many years to at a rate seven times the national average 5. develop following exposure and can manifest in benign or malignant forms 1. Mesothelioma is a cancer of the cells Literature review lining the lungs and abdominal cavity. It has been strongly linked to asbestos, is poorly responsive to treatment and is The aim of the literature review for this study was to almost always fatal. Asbestos related lung cancer (ARLC) determine the issues experienced by people with M/ARLC. causes similar symptoms and is treated similarly to lung The literature review identified scholarly work relevant to cancer in non-asbestos-exposed individuals 2. the study, as well as reporting attitudes and opinions related to the study apparent in media articles, reports and historical Although mesothelioma and asbestos related lung cancer literature. The literature selected for the review focused on (M/ARLC) is a worldwide health issue, the focus for this the perspectives of people with M/ARLC and their issues © SF Lee, MM O’Connor, Y Chapman, V Hamilton, K Francis, 2009. A licence to publish this material has been given to ARHEN http://www.rrh.org.au 2 associated with the experience of diagnosis, legal issues components in improving patient and carer satisfaction, associated with compensation and the search for curative according to a study on aspects of cancer 15 . treatments. There was little published information regarding the impact, experiences and needs of people diagnosed with For some people diagnosed with mesothelioma, the energy M/ARLC and their families, and a lack of Australian studies, and time required for finding out how to navigate the health an observation supported by Hawley et al 6. system can be burdensome when they are already quite ill. An Australian study on developing strategies to meet the Haigh, in his book ‘Asbestos House’, detailed the history of needs of people with mesothelioma included assistance in asbestos in Australia, focusing on the James Hardie ‘navigating the journey’ 6 as an important strategy to be Company 7. This company was a broad-based building supply addressed in planning for the future. Although this study did company that provided asbestos products. The book not focus specifically on the experience of palliative care for indicated the significant time difference between early people with mesothelioma, planning for the future would reports of apparent asbestos related illness and logically include the provision of palliative care. As a result acknowledgement of the risk among health authorities and of that study, Hawley and Monk reported that people the James Hardie Company. The significance of the diagnosed with M/ARLC have two main issues 16 . The first organisational apathy towards the risk may impact on issues concerned hope for a cure, and the second was a concern experienced by people who are subsequently diagnosed with regarding the location of their end of life care. The need for mesothelioma 7. It has been suggested that the pain respite care is also highlighted to support families in what is experienced by those diagnosed with mesothelioma is often referred to as ‘the burden of care’. complex, and exacerbated by issues such as anger relating to the causative factors of the disease being out of control, and The literature highlighted the burden for families beyond ongoing legal action 8. The complexity of the pain normal grief reactions of the newly bereaved. This additional experienced by those with mesothelioma was confirmed by a burden related to the necessary involvement of the coroner multidisciplinary team developed specifically to address the and the autopsy the coroner might recommend, which can pain issues of people at a hospice in the UK, which found impact further on the anxiety and stress of surviving particular issues for people diagnosed with mesothelioma 9. families 17 . In addition, compensation claims can increase the Despite identifying that people with mesothelioma had burden of suffering 18 . significant psychological distress, another study by Clayson, Seymour and Noble also found people with mesothelioma The literature review indicated that M/ARLC is likely to were stoic and more likely to request sedation rather than be cause significant distress in people with the disease and their involved in psychological strategies to address their family and carers, but there is a scarcity of research to distress 10 . inform service provision, particularly in palliative care.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Worksafe Victoria Is a Trading Name of the Victorian Workcover Authority
    Guidebook Horse stables and track riding safety Edition 2 August 2018 Contents Part 1: Introduction 3 Part 4: Track riding safety (training venues) 37 Roles and responsibilities 3 Track induction 37 Identifying hazards and controlling risks 5 Track supervision 38 Part 2: Stable safety 7 Training venue facilities and amenities 39 Induction 7 Hazard identification on the track 40 Training and competency of employees 7 Tracks and fencing 41 Workplace bullying and violence 7 Track first aid and emergency evacuation 44 Drugs and alcohol in the workplace 8 Racecourse stabling and stripping/tie-up Fatigue 9 stalls 45 Facilities 10 Access walkways from stalls to tracks 46 First aid 11 Track work riding - management Fire protection and emergency evacuation 12 and supervision 47 Design and layout 13 Personal protective equipment (PPE) 49 Personal protective equipment (PPE) 14 Horse riding gear 51 Housekeeping 15 Vehicle and pedestrian crossings and internal roadways 52 Stable security - perimeter fencing 16 Running rails 53 Electrical safety 17 Training tracks 56 Hazardous substances/dangerous goods 18 Crossings 57 Hazardous manual handling 20 Gaps and chutes 58 Specific items of plant – oat crushers, mixers and augers 22 Practice gates/barriers 58 Quad bikes 24 Fast/slow work on tracks 59 Handling and transporting horses 25 Jump outs 60 Part 3: Ancillary plant and facilities 28 Glossary 61 Horse swimming pools 28 Appendix A: Rider’s vests, helmets Swimming dams 30 and boots 62 Horse washes 31 Appendix B: Stable inspection checklist 63 Horse treadmills 32 Appendix C: Register of injuries 69 Horse walkers 34 Further information 72 Sand roll 35 Bullrings 36 WorkSafe Victoria is a trading name of the Victorian WorkCover Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Occupational Violence a Policy Framework Including
    Preventing occupational violence A policy framework including principles for managing weapons in Victorian health services 4 Clinical review of area mental health services 1997-2004 Preventing occupational violence A policy framework including principles for managing weapons in Victorian health services Updated December 2011 Acknowledgement The Department of Health would like to acknowledge the members of the Victorian Taskforce on Violence in Nursing who shared their extensive and diverse knowledge and experience in the Victorian health sector to inform this work. Professor Duncan Chappell has been involved in research and public policy development related to workplace violence for over a decade. He worked at the Australian Institute of Criminology (Canberra) and was the chair of the NSW Health Taskforce on prevention and management of violence in the health workforce. His contribution to this work requires special thanks. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible format phone 9096 8398 using the National Relay Service 13 36 77 if required, or email: [email protected] This document is available as a PDF on the internet at: www.health.vic.gov.au/nursing/promoting/noviolence © Copyright, State of Victoria, Department of Health 2011 This publication is copyright, no part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised and published by the Victorian Government, 50 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne. Except where otherwise indicated, the
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation of Plant Procedure
    ISOLATION OF PLANT PROCEDURE SCOPE This procedure applies to all staff, students and contractors using or working with plant. This procedure is applicable to all plant that may cause personnel injury or death due to uncontrolled or accidental re-activation of hazardous energy sources. PROCEDURE STATEMENT The purpose of this procedure is to set out the requirements for: • The identification, management and safe isolation of hazardous energy sources resulting from plant and associated systems; • Providing information related to the isolation and management of plant using Lock Out/Tag Out (LOTO) processes and associated equipment. 1. When is Plant Isolation Required This procedure must be followed when: 1.1.1 Damaged, malfunctioning or faulty plant is identified – (see Section 4, ‘Removing Plant from Service’) 1.1.2 Such instances usually result from activities not associated with normal plant operation or personnel interaction, such as during: • Initial testing, commissioning, installation or alteration of plant; • Routine or ad-hoc maintenance, including replacing consumable items internal/external to the plant (cutting blades, filters, dangerous goods gas cylinders, etc.); • The repair of damaged or faulty plant, sub systems and peripherals; • Cleaning and inspection activities; • Decommissioning and removal (including disposal) of plant. 1.1.3 The above activities should be considered, identified and evaluated via a documented plant specific or work activity risk assessment. If there is an identified risk of hazardous energy causing harm, the isolation process must be adhered to. 2. Requirement for Plant Specific Isolation Procedures Where documented plant specific or work activity risk assessments identify the potential for accidental re-energisation or the release of uncontrolled hazardous energy, the plants Responsible Officer must develop specific pre-determined instructions for isolation, de- energising, and re-activation activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Health Notes No. 1 Asbestos––Roles and Responsibilities Forgovernment
    Environmental health notes No. 1 Asbestos––Roles and responsibilities forgovernment Environmental health notes No. 1 Asbestos––Roles and responsibilities for government Department of Human Service Environmental Health Unit Health Risk Assessment and Management Program June 2005 ii Environmental health notes No. 1: Asbestos––Roles and responsibilities for government Acknowledgment The Environmental Health Unit, Department of Human Services, prepared these guidelines with input and advice of the following stakeholders: Environment Protection Authority Victoria (EPA) WorkSafe Victoria City of Moreland Australian Institute of Environmental Health (AIEH) Country Fire Authority (CFA)/Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board (MFB) Victorian Building Commission (BC). This document has been prepared in good faith, exercising due care and attention. However no representations or warranties are expressed or implied, in relation to the relevance, accuracy, completeness or fitness for the purpose of this document in respect of any particular user’s circumstances. Users of this document should satisfy themselves concerning its application to managing asbestos issues and where necessary, seek expert advice about their situation. The Department of Human Services shall not be liable to any person or entity with respect to any liability, loss or damage caused or alleged to have been caused directly or indirectly by this publication. Published by Rural and Regional Health and Aged Care Services, Victorian, Australia, June 2005 © CopyrightState ofVictoria 2005 This publication is copyright, no part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. This document may be downloaded from the Department of Human Services web site at: www.health.vic.gov.au/environment/ Authorised by the State Government, 120 Spencer Street, Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Operating Procedures Guidelines
    Safe Operating Procedures Page 1 Owner: Health, Wellbeing and Safety (HR) Last Review: 12 September 2019 Contents What are Safe Operating Procedures? ................................................................................................ 1 Safe Operating Procedures policy ........................................................................................................ 1 Responsibilities .................................................................................................................................... 2 Developing Safe Operating Procedures ............................................................................................... 2 Supporting Documents ........................................................................................................................ 3 Examples .............................................................................................................................................. 4 What are Safe Operating Procedures? Safe Operating Procedures (SOPs) (or Safe Working Procedures (SWP)) are operational documents created locally to describe the safest and most efficient way to perform a certain task, carry out an operation or operate a machine/tool. Safe Operating Procedures will normally come from a risk assessment as an administrative control. Written Safe Operating Procedures are an essential part of a safe system of work and are an important part of an overall occupational health and safety program. Safe Operating Procedures provide information necessary to
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Safety Australia Pty Ltd
    Safety Alert: 03-2016 .. 05 February 2016 WORKPLACE SAFETY AUSTRALIA PTY LTD This OHS Alert is the copyright of Workplace Safety Australia Pty Ltd. Other than for the purposes, and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act 1968, you may not replicate, forward, copy or otherwise transmit this OHS Alert to any other party, except pursuant to the following terms, without the prior written permission of Workplace Safety Australia. Paid subscribers of Workplace Safety Australia Pty Ltd who receive this OHS Alert as part of their subscription may forward or copy this publication within their business or organisation only pursuant to the terms of their subscription. Under no circumstances should this OHS Alert be distributed or copied to any person, or organisation, or any other entity, outside of the subscriber organisation. In This Alert… Editorial Legislative Changes and Proposed Legislative Changes… o Mining and Petroleum Safety Changes Commenced February o Supplementary Changes to Mining and Petroleum Regulations in NSW o Electricity Network Changes in NSW Open for Comment … In Other News… o EOIs Sought for Independent Chairperson of NSW Mining Competence Board o WorkSafe NT Warns of Dangers to Unauthorised Access to Workplaces o WA Quarterly Workers Comp Seminar o Maintenance and Repair of Commercial Vehicles – Warning from Worksafe Victoria o NSW Warning on Work in Wet and Windy Conditions o Queensland Releases 5-Point Plan on Pneumoconiosis o WorkSafe Victoria Urges Vigilance After More Deaths In The Courts … o $1.3 Million in Damages Follows Sexual Harassement and Bullying Note: Web hyperlinks are reproduced in their full text throughout Workplace Safety Australia’s Alerts.
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Workcover Authority © Victorian Workcover Authority 2002
    Auditing Health and Safety Management Systems 4th Edition SafetyMAP: AUDITING HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 4th Edition Published by the Victorian WorkCover Authority © Victorian WorkCover Authority 2002 First Published 1994 (As ‘A Guide to Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems’) Second Edition 1995 Reprinted 1997 Third Edition 1997 Fourth Edition 2002 ISBN 0-7594-3102-7 This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be made to: WorkSafe Victoria P.O. Box 4306 Melbourne Vic 3001 Australia CONTENTS Preface. 2 3.10 Hazard identification, risk assessment and control of risks – Specific . 24 Acknowledgements . 2 Access control . 25 Introducing SafetyMAP . 3 (Use of) Contractors . 25 Design . 25 PART 1: SafetyMAP EXPLAINED Disposal of materials and substances . 25 Employee welfare . 25 The SafetyMAP approach . 4 Hazardous substances/dangerous goods. 25 The SafetyMAP process . 4 Permit to work . 25 Starting out-conducting a self-assessment. 4 Personal protective equipment . 25 Continual improvement and self-audit. 5 Plant . 25 Certification. 6 Purchasing goods . 26 Documentation required . 7 Signage . 26 Applying for a SafetyMAP certificate … . 7 Storage and transport of materials . 26 Supervision . 26 A guide to internal auditing . 8 Supply of goods and services . 26 Traceability . 26 SafetyMAP certification levels . 10 3.11 Emergency preparedness and response . 27 Definitions . 11 Element 4 Measurement and evaluation . 28 PART 2: AUDIT CRITERIA 4.1 Monitoring and measurement – General . 28 4.2 Monitoring and measurement Element 1 Health and safety policy .
    [Show full text]
  • The Monitor Keeping All Those with an Interest in OHS Informed of Developments in Workplace Health and Safety Nationally and Internationally
    the monitor keeping all those with an interest in OHS informed of developments in workplace health and safety nationally and internationally Issue 3 Vol 21 MAY 2017 L-R Hon Bill Johnston, MLA, Terry Slevin, Prof Lin Fritschi, Dr Michael Maxwell, Dr Peter Connaughton, Michael Tunnecliffe OHSA(WA) SEMINAR - Thursday, 13 July 2017 Improving Occupational Health for West Australians The Occupational Health Society of Australia (WA) will conduct an important and topical seminar on 13 July 2017 which will address a range of issues of concern to occupational health and safety professionals. Matters for consideration and discussion: • The future direction of occupational health and safety legislation in Western Australia • Growing concerns with the incidence of occupational carcinogens • The role of occupational health physicians and the monitoring of workplaces and the health of employees under the expected Model OHS legislation • The current status and direction of hazardous chemicals exposure in Australian workplaces Details Date: Thursday, 13 July 2017 Venue: Cambridge Room, City West Receptions, 45 Plaistowe Mews, Perth Time: 8:30 am – 12:30 pm Continued on page 3 OccupatiOnal HealtH SOciety Of auStralia (Wa) Occupational Health Society of Australia (WA) PO Box 171 Belmont WA 6984 www.ohswa/marcsta.com ABN: dfkjdlkfjdlkfjlkjfd PO Box 171, Belmont WA 6984 Telephone: 6272 6120 www.ohswa.marcsta.com email: [email protected] ABN: 83 170 105830 In this issue . Legislation/Regulation A new era in occupational health and safety in WA ................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Compliance Code Managing Asbestos in Workplaces Contents
    Edition No. 1 September 2008 Compliance Code Managing asbestos in workplaces Contents Preface 2 Indicating the presence of asbestos 26 Introduction 3 Controlling risks to health associated Purpose 3 with the presence of asbestos 27 Scope 3 Deciding if there is a risk to health that needs controlling 27 Application 4 Controlling risk using the hierarchy of control measures 28 Consultation 4 Proper installation and maintenance of control measures 33 General requirements of the Occupational Information, instruction and training 33 Health and Safety Regulations 2007 6 Demolition and refurbishment 34 Duty to control exposure to airborne asbestos fibres 6 Definition of the terms ‘demolition’ and ‘refurbishment’ 34 Regulatory prohibitions 8 Review of the asbestos register prior Prohibitions under the Occupational Health and to demolition or refurbishment 36 Safety Act 2004 (regulations 4.3.7 to 4.3.9) 8 What to do if the asbestos register Prohibitions under the Dangerous Goods Act 1985 indicates that asbestos is present 37 (regulations 4.3.10 to 4.3.16) 10 Duties that apply if no asbestos register Exclusions from the dangerous goods prohibitions 10 exists for the workplace 37 Supply, storage, transport, sale and use of fixed Demolition and refurbishment at domestic premises 38 or installed asbestos 10 Conducting asbestos removal prior Brake shoes lined with asbestos 11 to demolition or refurbishment 39 Other exclusions from the prohibitions 11 Workplace emergency where asbestos is present 39 Responsibilities of importers and suppliers of Asbestos
    [Show full text]
  • Safetymap Advanced Level User Guide
    SafetyMAP Advanced Level User Guide Advanced Level User Guide 4th Edition Introduction This User Guide has been produced to support SafetyMAP: Auditing Health and Safety Management Systems, 4th Edition and it is assumed that persons using this Guide will be familiar with that publication. This User Guide is intended to assist persons who are wanting to gain further information about the SafetyMAP audit criteria. This should make it particularly useful to SafetyMAP auditors and those who are intending to be audited against SafetyMAP. The information should also be useful if you are using SafetyMAP as a guide to assist in the development of your health and safety management system. This Guide provides: • Information about the SafetyMAP Certification program; • Explanation of the SafetyMAP criteria; and • Examples of evidence that may assist in demonstrating conformance to the SafetyMAP criteria. This Guide is also designed so that it can be used as a workbook. SafetyMAP Certification If you are interested having your system certified, SafetyMAP Certification is available at two levels of system performance: 1. Initial Level; and 2. Advanced Level. The Table SafetyMAP Certificate Levels on page 256 shows the criteria at the two Certificate levels. To gain Certification to SafetyMAP Initial Level requires conformance by an organisation to the 82 Initial Level Criteria. SafetyMAP Advanced Certification requires conformance by an organization to all SafetyMAP 4th edition criteria. Certification Bodies If you wish to have your health and safety management system certified to the requirements of SafetyMAP, you will need the services of a company that undertakes this task. Only companies accredited by the ‘Joint Accreditation System – Australia and New Zealand’ (JAS‐ANZ) may conduct SafetyMAP certification audits and award SafetyMAP certificates.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupational Lung Disease in Australia
    Occupational Lung Disease in Australia Everyone should be able to work in an environment free from harm. Complacency has led to hundreds of people being diagnosed with preventable and incurable lung diseases. A national approach across every state and territory in Australia is required to protect workers from exposure to hazardous dust, gases or fumes. Occupational lung diseases are an important and under-recognised cause of respiratory ill health in Australia (1). These disorders are a preventable and treatable cause of much sickness, disability and death. In addition to the traditional “dust diseases”, occupational lung disease encompasses a wide spectrum of disorders. Some of the most common examples include: • Work-related asthma • Asbestos-related conditions (mesothelioma, asbestosis, lung cancer and benign pleural conditions) • Silicosis • Coal dust pneumoconiosis (Black Lung) • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) • Chronic Bronchitis • Other pneumoconiosis (hard metal lung disease, chronic beryllium disease, talcosis) • Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (farmers lung, bagassosis) Occupational lung disease is under-recognised in Australia, and there are limited data available on disease prevalence (1). There is also, often a long latency period of many years between exposure and diagnosis and because of this, the link to occupation and current disease may not be made. However, international studies have shown that approximately 15% of adult-onset cases of asthma and COPD are related to occupational exposures, and, importantly, 10-25% of cases of lung cancer (1). One quarter of working people with asthma either have their asthma caused by their work or made worse by their working conditions (1). There is a wide spectrum of occupational causes of interstitial lung disease that if not considered may result in the misdiagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
    [Show full text]
  • 4957 VWA Officewise
    A handbook for workplaces Officewise – A guide to health & safety in the office Edition No. 5 January 2006 CONTENTS Introduction. 1 5. Working with computers . 49 Using this guide . 1 Health effects . 51 How this guide can help you. 1 6. General health and safety issues in the office . 53 1. Managing occupational health and safety Specific health and safety issues. 53 in the office . 2 Emergency management. 56 The risk management approach . 2 Copying and similar equipment . 57 Identifying hazards in the office . 6 Hazardous substances . 58 Occupational health and safety legislation . 9 Housekeeping issues in the office. 59 Developing a health and safety policy . 10 Appendices. 62 2. Job design in office work. 12 A. Setting up your workstation . 62 Physical factors . 12 B. Exercises for office workers . 68 Psychosocial factors at work. 13 C. Office Safety Checklist . 72 Reducing stress through good job design . 17 Job design . 73 3. Designing a healthy and safe working Social and psychological issues . 74 environment . 22 Manual handling . 75 Lighting in the office . 22 Environmental factors. 76 Noise in the office . 26 Office layout . 78 Thermal comfort and air quality in the office . 29 Workstations . 79 4. Office layout, workstations and equipment . 32 Office equipment and tools. 80 Office layout and design. 32 Storage . 81 Workstation design. 33 Copying equipment . 82 Chairs. 34 Hazardous substances. 83 Desks and workbenches . 37 Electrical hazards . 84 Data input devices – keyboards, the mouse, Housekeeping . 85 and other pointing devices . 39 D. References and advice – where to obtain them . 89 Other office equipment . 40 Subject index .
    [Show full text]