Arxiv:2105.06774V2 [Math.DG] 18 Jun 2021 Projection for Relating Points in Minkowski 4-Space R with Spheres in 3-Dimensional Subgeome- 3,1 Tries
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Discrete Weierstrass-type representations MASON PEMBER, DENIS POLLY, AND MASASHI YASUMOTO Abstract. Discrete Weierstrass-type representations yield a construction method in discrete differential geometry for certain classes of discrete surfaces. We show that the known discrete Weierstrass-type representations of certain surface classes can be viewed as applications of the Ω- dual transform to lightlike Gauss maps in Laguerre geometry. From this construction, further Weierstrass-type representations arise. As an application of the techniques we develop, we show that all discrete linear Weingarten surfaces of Bryant or Bianchi type locally arise via Weierstrass-type representations from discrete holomorhpic maps. 1. Introduction Weierstrass-type representations play an important role in differential geometry. The classical representations, like the Weierstrass-Enneper representation for minimal surfaces in Euclidean 3 space R [28] or the representation of Bryant for constant mean curvature (cmc) 1 surfaces 3 in hyperbolic space H [6, 26], are convenient tools to generate interesting examples of these surface classes. Before the concept of discrete curvatures via mixed area was introduced in [3], the existence of discrete analogues of these representations was used as justification for the definition of certain discrete surface classes. Examples of this include: 3 • discrete isothermic minimal surfaces in R [2, Thm 9], 2;1 • discrete maximal surfaces in R [29, Thm 1.1], 3 • discrete cmc 1 surfaces in H [14, Thm 4.4], • discrete linear Weingarten surfaces of Bryant or Bianchi type (abbreviated as BrLW and BiLW, respectively) [16, 30]. For all but the last example above, it has since been shown that the characterisation of these surface classes via representations coincides with their corresponding definitions via discrete 3 curvatures (see for example [3]). Recently, this was shown for discrete flat fronts in H , an example of a discrete BrLW surface, in [12, Sec 3.2]. In the smooth theory, the aforementioned surface classes belong to the class of L-isothermic surfaces. It is therefore natural to utilise Laguerre geometry to gain a unified geometric under- standing of Weierstrass-type representations, which was done in [22]. To suit our goal of a unified geometric description of discrete Weierstrass-type representations1, we seek a discrete analogue of this approach. We note that interpretations of certain discrete Weierstrass-type representations have been shown in conformal and Lie sphere geometry, such as in the works of [1, 19, 15]. In Section 2, we give a brief overview of Laguerre geometry, describing the method of isotropy 3;1 arXiv:2105.06774v2 [math.DG] 18 Jun 2021 projection for relating points in Minkowski 4-space R with spheres in 3-dimensional subgeome- 3;1 tries. Laguerre transformations can then be viewed as the affine transformations of R . We give particular attention to the Laguerre transformations that are induced by hyperbolic rotations of 3 3;1 H ⊂ R , and give a description of these in terms of SL(2; C) matrices. Date: June 21, 2021. 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. 53A70 (primary); 51B15 (secondary). 1In this paper, the term “Weierstrass-type representation” refers to representations that are built from discrete holomorphic functions. However, this term can also refer to other representations, such as in [21] where a discrete 3 analogue of the Kenmotsu representation is developed for discrete nonzero cmc surfaces in R using discrete harmonic maps. 1 2 DISCRETE WEIERSTRASS-TYPE REPRESENTATIONS In Section 3, we describe how discrete surfaces are studied in Laguerre geometry, via discrete Legendre maps with discrete lightlike Gauss maps. We then give a discretisation of the light cone 3;1 curvatures of surfaces in R developed in [18] and show how these curvatures relate to those of 3;1 discrete surfaces in certain subgeometries of R . We then recall the notions of discrete Ω-surfaces and the Ω-dual transformation developed in [8]. This allows us to define the fundamental notion of discrete L-isothermic surfaces, being those discrete Ω-surfaces that are Ω-dual to their lightlike Gauss map. We then give a Laguerre geometric description of the Calapso transformation for this surface class. In Section 4, we apply the theory of discrete L-isothermic surfaces to show how various discrete Weierstrass-type representations can be seen as applications of the Ω-dual transformation to a prescribed discrete lightlike Gauss map. This includes the aforementioned examples, but also gives rise to representations for new discrete surface classes such as intrinsically flat surfaces in the light cone. Moreover our results allow us to prove the existence of representations for discrete surface classes defined via discrete curvatures, in particular showing that all discrete BrLW and BiLW surfaces locally admit Weierstrass-type representations. We also show that the Calapso transformation descends to the Lawson correspondence in this setting and gives rise to a discrete 3 analogue of the duality for cmc 1 surfaces in H developed in [27]. 2. Preliminaries We give a brief introduction to Laguerre geometry, the setting for our considerations: Denote 3;1 by R the 4-dimensional space with basis (e0; e1; e2; e3), equipped with the Minkowski product (; ), given by (e0; e0) = −1; (ei; ei) = 1; i 2 f1; 2; 3g; and (ei; ej) = 0; for i 6= j: (1) 3;1 We call a vector v 2 R spacelike, timelike or lightlike if (v; v) is positive, negative or equal to zero respectively. 3;1 The group of orthogonal transformations of R , denoted O(3; 1), is a Lie group and its Lie 2 3;1 algebra o(3; 1) is the algebra of skew-symmetric endomorphisms. We identify Λ R with o(3; 1) via (v1 ^ v2)w = (v1; w)v2 − (v2; w)v1: 2 3;1 A basis of Λ R (and thereby of o(3; 1)) is given by fenmgn<m, with enm = en ^ em. 3;1 In the Hermitian model of R , points are identified with Hermitian 2 × 2 matrices: Let i 3;1 denote an imaginary unit. Then, the basis vectors of R become 1 0 0 1 0 i 1 0 e = ; e = ; e = ; e = 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 −i 0 3 0 −1 and the inner product (1) is polarization of jvj2 = − det v. Each skew-symmetric endomorphism is identified with a matrix A 2 sl(2; C) via A · v = Av + vA∗; T where A∗ = A . Thereby, the elements of the basis of o(3; 1) are identified as 1 i i i e = − e ; e = e ; e = − e ; e = e : (2) 0n 2 n 12 2 3 13 2 2 23 2 1 Furthermore, every matrix B 2 SL(2; C) induces an orthogonal transformation via B · v = BvB∗: (3) 3;1 In Laguerre geometry, isotropy projection is used to identify points in R with oriented spheres (see [13, Sect 3.4]). Two spheres s1; s2 are in oriented contact, if the difference vector Discrete Weierstrass-type representations 3 s1 − s2 is lightlike. Laguerre transformations are affine transformations of the form x 7! Bx + b; where the linear part B 2 O(3; 1) is orthogonal (thus, Laguerre transformations preserve ori- 3;1 ented contact) and the translation part b 2 R is any vector. A Laguerre transformation fixes orientation of spheres if its linear part is time-orientation preserving and therefore fixes 3 3;1 H := fv 2 R :(v; v) = −1; v0 > 0g; which is the model space of the Minkowski model of hyperbolic geometry. Thereby, isometries 3 of H are the linear parts of Laguerre transformations that fix orientation of spheres. 2 In the light cone model of Möbius geometry, points in the 2-sphere S are represented by lines in the light cone 3;1 L := fv 2 R :(v; v) = 0g: A Möbius transformation is obtained by the action of an orthogonal transformation on points 2 2 in PL. Thereby we obtain a 1-to-1 correspondence between Möbius transformations of S and 3 isometries of H . a b Let B = be an SL(2; ) matrix inducing a complex Möbius transformation c d C az + b z 7! : cz + d We aim to show that this is the Möbius transformation obtained by the action of B on L in the Hermitian model3. Via inverse stereographic projection, every z 2 C is identified with a point in L by 2 2 z 7! (jzj + 1)e0 + (z + z)e1 − i(z − z)e2 + (jzj − 1)e3 jzj2 z (4) = ; z 1 3;1 where h·i denotes the linear span of vectors. The action of B on R , X 7! B · X as defined in (3), induces a Möbius transformation via 0 2 1 * az+b az+b + 2 cz+d cz+d jzj z B C B · z = B · = @ A ; z 1 az+b cz+d 1 which is indeed the action of B on C. Example 2.1. A hyperbolic rotation Γhg1i(t) in 3 is an orthogonal transformations for which hg2i H there are two lightlike points g1; g2, such that 8 t Id on hg1i hg1i < ? Γhg i(t) = Id on hg1; g2i 2 −1 : t Id on hg2i : 3;1 On any point v 2 R , we have hg1i 1 − t 1 Γhg i(t)v = v + (g1; v)g2 − (g2; v)g1 : 2 (g1; g2) t 2For B 2 O(3; 1), the same Möbius transformation is induced by ±B, precisely one of which preserves time orientation. 3Note that complex Möbius transformations are even in the sense that each complex Möbius transformation is the product of an even number of reflections in a circle. Therefore, complex Möbius transformations in the light 3 cone model correspond to SO(3; 1) transformations and induce isometries on H 4 DISCRETE WEIERSTRASS-TYPE REPRESENTATIONS 1 0 Assume, q = 2= hg ; g i.