Textual, Historical, and Theological Notes on 1 Nephi 1:18–20

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Textual, Historical, and Theological Notes on 1 Nephi 1:18–20 Potent Messianism: Textual, Historical, and Theological Notes on 1 Nephi 1:18–20 Joseph M. Spencer According to a reading I will defend in this essay, it appears that Lehi, when he “went forth among the people and began to prophesy” (1 Nephi 1:18), addressed two distinct prophetic messages to his Jerusalem audience.1 The first of these messages concerned things then present: Lehi is said to have testified of the “wickedness” and “abominations” of his contemporaries (v. 19). But the second message concerned things then still in the future: Lehi preached of the coming of “a messiah” as well as “the redemption of the world” (v. 19). Further, as I will sug- gest, these two distinct prophetic messages seem to have sparked two similarly distinct responses. When told of their wickedness, those at Jerusalem responded with mockery; when told of messianic redemption, they responded with anger. In fact, they “sought [Lehi’s] life, that they might take it away” (v. 20). Direct prophetic accusation provoked only laughter and derision, but abstract and largely theological prophetic talk provoked murderous rage. 1. Like others in this volume, I draw all quotations of the Book of Mormon from Royal Skousen’s The Book of Mormon: The Earliest Text (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), though, where it seems to me helpful to do so, I replace Skousen’s suggested punctuation of the text with my own. 47 48 Joseph M. Spencer In the first section of this paper, I will defend the above reading at the exegetical level. However, if the narrative of 1 Nephi 1 does, in fact, distinguish between Lehi’s accusatory preaching and his prophetic message, and if the same narrative presents blithe mockery and violent anger as distinct respective responses to these two sorts of prophetic preaching, then verses 18–20 are odd. One would expect that con- frontation and accusation would invite anger and violence, while talk of some distant messianic redeemer would provoke little more than laughter. Today, to be sure, we mock wild-eyed figures that announce the world’s end and reserve our political rage for those who oppose and accuse us. But historical study of the political climate of the late sev- enth and early sixth centuries before Christ helps to clarify why talk of messianic redemption—especially in Lehi’s indefinite formulation: “a messiah,” rather than “the Messiah”—might have been regarded with violent suspicion in the place and time of Lehi’s preaching. It may be that, historically speaking, there is nothing at all surprising about what verses 18–20 claim. Such seems to me the upshot of the best historical research on preexilic Judean politics and religion. In the second section of this paper, therefore, I attempt to explain the basic narrative of Lehi’s preaching by looking to history. However, if history can help to clarify the basic stakes of the narra- tive report of verses 18–20—clarifying for modern readers what would have seemed natural in ancient times—it must be said that this only sets the stage for genuine theological reflection. In a book intentionally directed to readers living after the rise of secularism, when messianic talk is universally regarded with skepticism, it is necessary to go at least one step beyond historical reflection. If part of what makes scripture scripture is the way it reorganizes history according to patterns that outline a life lived faithfully before God, it is necessary to consider the theological measure of Lehi’s messianic preaching. What could talk of an indefinite, singular messiah—Lehi’s talk of “a messiah” rather than of “the Messiah”—mean for the modern reader? In what way, if any, is this brief report on Lehi’s preaching relevant? Sustained reflection on Lehi’s prophetic gesture helps to produce a crucial theological recon- ceptualization of the messianic, laying the groundwork for a notion that I will call “potent messianism.” In a third and final part of this Potent Messianism 49 paper, therefore, I outline a theology of potent messianism, a thinking of the singular messiah. Textual matters The basic interpretation of 1 Nephi 1:18–20, from which I take both my historical and my theological bearings, is not currently represented in secondary literature on the Book of Mormon. In fact, so far as I have been able to find, only one author has even hinted at the possibility that Nephi means to distinguish between two sequences or subjects of prophetic preaching and two respective responses to such preaching.2 To a certain extent, this lack in the literature seems to be a consequence of the fact that close interpretive study of the Book of Mormon is largely nascent, not yet a discipline in its own right. However, other forces may also be at work. As I read and reread this passage in current and recent editions of the Book of Mormon, I suspect that this lacuna in interpre- tation is largely due to the modern textual apparatus through which 1 Nephi 1 is today presented. More specifically, the current chapter and verse breaks in this case divert the reader’s attention from a theologi- cally crucial implication of the text. There is in fact much to learn from paying close attention to the logic of the current chapter and verse breaks in the Book of Mormon. They were introduced into the text in the 1870s by Orson Pratt, who was given the task of producing an edition of the Book of Mormon that looked more like the Bible and that could be referenced more eas- ily.3 Before Pratt’s work on the text’s apparatus, the Book of Mormon was printed in simple, unnumbered paragraphs, which appeared in chapters that were generally much longer than the chapters in more recent editions of the book.4 Royal Skousen has shown that the original 2. See Hugh Nibley, An Approach to the Book of Mormon, 2nd ed. (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 1979), 40. 3. For a short overview of Pratt’s work, see David J. Whittaker, “ ‘That Most Im- portant of All Books’: A Printing History of the Book of Mormon,” Mormon Historical Studies 6 (Fall 2005): 116–17. 4. It should be noted that the Community of Christ—and before it, the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints—retained the original chapter breaks in 50 Joseph M. Spencer pre-Pratt chapter breaks were part of the dictated text of the Book of Mormon and were apparently intended elements of the text.5 When Pratt set to work both imposing shorter chapter lengths on the text and inserting relatively natural verse divisions into the text, he was faced with an essentially interpretive task. The chapter breaks and verse divi- sions that appear in current and recent editions of the Book of Mormon thus tell us something about how at least one close reader—perhaps the nineteenth-century’s most dedicated student of the Book of Mormon— made sense of the text. Studying them closely also reveals how verses and chapters might have been divided differently. These considerations are doubly relevant to the interpretation of 1 Nephi 1:18–20. First, it should be noted that what is now 1 Nephi 1 was originally only a part—a relatively small part—of a longer chapter. What was in Joseph Smith’s dictation “Chapter I” of “The First Book of Nephi” is now 1 Nephi 1–5, a complicated narrative that begins with Lehi’s inaugural vision of a prophecy-inspiring record (the heavenly book) coming down to him from God’s presence and ends with Lehi’s subsequent experience of a prophecy-inspiring book (the brass plates) coming down to him from Jerusalem. When Orson Pratt decided to break this originally integral story into five parts—each of today’s first five chapters of 1 Nephi—he presumably felt he had found rela- tively natural breaks in its complicated narrative. One might suggest, however, that it would have been more natural to conclude 1 Nephi 1 with what is now verse 17, so the story of Lehi’s preaching in verses 18–20 would have served chiefly as an introduction to the story of Lehi’s departure into the wilderness.6 Pratt’s decision to place verses 18–20 in chapter 1, however, distances Lehi’s preaching and Jerusalem’s their printings of the Book of Mormon, even after they too introduced versification into the volume. Recent republications of pre-Pratt editions of the Book of Mormon are also available, most accessibly in Joseph Smith Jr., The Book of Mormon, ed. Laurie Maffly-Kipp (New York: Penguin, 2008). 5. See Royal Skousen, Analysis of Textual Variants of the Book of Mormon, 6 pts. (Provo, UT: FARMS, 2004–2009), 44. 6. In fact, a host of textual connections between 1 Nephi 1:1–3 and 1 Nephi 1:16–17 suggests that what is now 1 Nephi 1:1–17 forms a kind of coherent textual unit, some- thing that can be taken independently of the rest of 1 Nephi 1–5. Potent Messianism 51 reaction to it from the subsequent commandment to leave the city. That decision, importantly, makes verse 20 the conclusion of what is now the opening chapter of the Book of Mormon, a fact that has rather heavily influenced interpretation of both Nephi’s writings and the Book of Mormon as a whole. Nephi’s reference in that concluding verse to the Lord’s tender mercies assisting in the deliverance of the faithful has been taken as a kind of thesis statement both for Nephi’s record and for the Book of Mormon as a whole.7 A second point of importance here concerns the verse divisions Pratt imposed on the text today known as verses 18–20, regardless of whether the passage should be included with chapter 1 or chapter 2.
Recommended publications
  • The Druze: Culture, History and Mission
    The Druze A New Cultural and Historical Appreciation Abbas Halabi 2013 www.garnetpublishing.co.uk 1 The Druze Published by Garnet Publishing Limited 8 Southern Court South Street Reading RG1 4QS UK www.garnetpublishing.co.uk www.twitter.com/Garnetpub www.facebook.com/Garnetpub blog.garnetpublishing.co.uk Copyright © Abbas Halabi, 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review. First Edition 2013 ISBN: 9781859643532 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Jacket design by Garnet Publishing Typeset by Samantha Barden Printed and bound in Lebanon by International Press: [email protected] 2 To Karl-Abbas, my first grandson And the future generation of my family 3 Preface Foreword Introduction Chapter 1 Human geography Chapter 2 The history of the Druze, 1017–1943 Chapter 3 Communal and social organization Chapter 4 Traditional culture and the meaning of al-Adhā feast Chapter 5 Civil status law Chapter 6 The diaspora and cultural expansion Chapter 7 The political role of the Druze from independence to the present time Chapter 8 The Druze message: plurality and unity Summary and conclusion Appendix 1 The impact of European influences on the Druze community: “The new look” Appendix 2 Sheikh Halīm Taqī al-Dīn: a man of knowledge,
    [Show full text]
  • Messianism and the Heaven and Earth Society: Approaches to Heaven and Earth Society Texts
    Messianism and the Heaven and Earth Society: Approaches to Heaven and Earth Society Texts Barend J. ter Haar During the last decade or so, social historians in China and the United States seem to have reached a new consensus on the origins of the Heaven and Earth Society (Tiandihui; "society" is the usual translation for hui, which, strictly speaking, means "gathering"; for the sake of brevity, the phenomenon is referred to below with the common alternative name "Triad," a translation of sänke hui). They view the Triads äs voluntary brotherhoods organized for mutual support, which later developed into a successful predatory tradition. Supporters of this Interpretation react against an older view, based on a literal reading of the Triad foundation myth, according to which the Triads evolved from pro-Ming groups during the early Qing dynasty. The new Interpretation relies on an intimate knowledge of the official documents that were produced in the course of perse- cuting these brotherhoods on the mainland and on Taiwan since the late eigh- teenth Century. The focus of this recent research has been on specific events, resulting in a more detailed factual knowledge of the phenomenon than before (Cai 1987; Qin 1988: 1—86; Zhuang 1981 provides an excellent historiographical survey). Understandably, contemporary social historians have hesitated to tackle the large number of texts produced by the Triads because previous historians have misinterpreted them and because they are füll of obscure religious Information and mythological references. Nevertheless, the very fact that these texts were produced (or copied) continuously from the first years of the nineteenth Century —or earlier—until the late 1950s, and served äs the basis for Triad initiation rituals throughout this period, leaves little doubt that they were important to the members of these groups.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS Israelis with a Russian Accent Jewish Messianism
    VOLUME XXXV NUMBER 2 DECEMBER 1993 u CONTENTS Israelis with a Russian Accent FRAN MARKOWITZ Jewish Messianism Lubavitch-Style: An Interim Report WILLIAM SHAFFIR American Jewry GEOFFREY ALDERMAN A Note on Present-Day Sephardi and Oriental Jewry MICHAEL M. LASKIER Book Reviews Chronicle Editor: J udith Freedman OBJECTS AND SPONSORSHIP OF THE JEWISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY The Jewish Journal ofSociology was sponsored by the Cultural Department of the World Jewish Congress from its inception in I959 until the end of I980. Thereafter, from the first issue of I98I (volume 23, no. I), the Journal has been sponsored by Maurice Freedman Research Trust Limited, which is registered as an educational charity by the Charity Commission of England and Wales (no. 326077). It has as its main purposes the encouragement of research in the sociology of the Jews and the publication of The Jewish Journal of Sociology. The objects of the Journal remain as stated in the Editorial of the first issue in I959' 'This Journal has been brought into being in order to provide an international vehicle for serious writing on Jewish social affairs ... Academically we address ourselves not only to sociologists, but to social scientists in general, to historians, to philosophers, and to students of comparative religion .... We should like to stress both that the Journal is editorially independent and that the opinions expressed by authors are their own responsibility.' The founding Editor of the JJS was Morris Ginsberg, and the founding Managing Editor was Maurice Freedman. Morris Ginsberg, who had been Professor of Sociology at the London School of Economics, died in I 970.
    [Show full text]
  • CTH302 Messianism
    NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES COURSE CODE: CTH302 COURSE TITLE: Messianism COURSE GUIDE CTH 302 MESSIANISM COURSE DEVELOPMENT TEAM Course Developer/Writer Dr. Owolabi.A.Jacob National Open University of Nigeria Lagos Course Editor Dr. Godwin.I. Akper National Open University of Nigeria Lagos Programme Leader Dr. Godwin.I. Akper National Open University of Nigeria Lagos Course Coordinator Dr. Owolabi.A.Jacob National Open University of Nigeria Lagos 2 National Open University of Nigeria Headquarters 14/16 Ahamadu Bello Way Victoria Island Lagos Abuja Office No 5 Dar es Salaam Street Off Aminu Kano Crescent Wuse 11 Abuja Nigeria e-mail:[email protected] URL:www.nou.edu.ng Published By: National Open University of Nigeria NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA 3 Introduction CTH302: This course explores the history behind biblical messianic expectation by the Jews. It deals with the definitions of messanism,messianic hope in the Davidic Dynasty . What You Will Learn In This Course You will learn about factors leading to the biblical messianic expectation,; the act of anointing persons and old testament prophesies about future Davidic kings. You will also learn about Jesus the anointed of the spirit the wicked one Satan was overcome by Jesus the messiah begins at his ministry at Galilee to its resurrection. In the course, you will also study how the early church accepted Jesus as the messiah. Course Aims The aim of this course is to state reasons Israel look forward for messaiahs. It explores you to the study of some Kings who are messiahs of the Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Temple Messianism and the Historical Jesus Jordan Kassabaum College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida
    “Who Do You Say I Am?”: Second Temple Messianism and the Historical Jesus Jordan Kassabaum College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida The goal of this study was to examine Second Temple messianic literature to determine the nature of Jewish messianic speculation in that period and compare Jesus’ messianic theology as recounted in the Synoptic Gospels to determine how the historical Jesus adopted, adapted, and expanded previous Jewish messianic notions into his own time. Examining the points of contact and divergence between Jesus and his religious predecessors reveals that, while he added his own contributions to Second Temple Jewish messianic theology, Jesus interpreted his own in specifically Jewish ways, adopting many of the diverse aspects of messianic speculation that permeated Jewish thought in the first century CE. In this sense, Jesus is a microcosm of the diversity of Second Temple Jewish messianic speculation. Additionally, the early church that inherited Jesus’ legacy did not interpret every aspect of his messianic theology in the same manner he did, understanding several aspects in distinctly non-Jewish ways. This phenomenon was the product of the much larger impulse to distinguish early Christianity from Judaism, a process that began with the Gospel writers and continued into the early church period. INTRODUCTION referring to a specific eschatological figure, but as a general phrase referring to the author as a mortal in Jesus was born, lived, and died as a first century contrast to God or humanity in general. The best equation Palestinian Jew. He observed the Jewish Law, celebrated one could make is to the English word “human,” Jewish festivals, read from the Jewish scriptures, and “humankind,” or “mortal.” It is not a respectful description, participated in Jewish communal worship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eschatology of the Dead Sea Scrolls
    Eruditio Ardescens The Journal of Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 1 February 2016 The Eschatology of the Dead Sea Scrolls J. Randall Price Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/jlbts Part of the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Price, J. Randall (2016) "The Eschatology of the Dead Sea Scrolls," Eruditio Ardescens: Vol. 2 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/jlbts/vol2/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eruditio Ardescens by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Eschatology of the Dead Sea Scrolls J. Randall Price, Ph.D. Center for Judaic Studies Liberty University [email protected] Recent unrest in the Middle East regularly stimulates discussion on the eschatological interpretation of events within the biblical context. In light of this interest it is relevant to consider the oldest eschatological interpretation of biblical texts that had their origin in the Middle East – the Dead Sea Scrolls. This collection of some 1,000 and more documents that were recovered from caves along the northwestern shores of the Dead Sea in Israel, has become for scholars of both the Old and New Testaments a window into Jewish interpretation in the Late Second Temple period, a time known for intense messianic expectation. The sectarian documents (non-biblical texts authored by the Qumran Sect or collected by the Jewish Community) among these documents are eschatological in nature and afford the earliest and most complete perspective into the thinking of at least one Jewish group at the time of Jesus’ birth and the formation of the early church.
    [Show full text]
  • Novenson Grammar of Messianism Chapter 1
    Edinburgh Research Explorer The Grammar of Messianism Citation for published version: Novenson, M 2017, The Grammar of Messianism: An Ancient Jewish Political Idiom and Its Users . Oxford University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190255022.001.0001 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190255022.001.0001 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 Chapter 1 After the Messianic Idea An anonymous seventh-century CE Jewish writer tells the story of a mythical woman named Hephzibah, the mother of the messiah ben David, who fights alongside the messiah ben David and the messiah ben Joseph in the final eschatological battle against Armilus. Hephzibah slays wicked gentile kings with a rod of almond wood that had belonged to Adam, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, and David in turn and was hidden away until the last day to be wielded by the mother of the messiah.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Studies (RELI) 1
    Religious Studies (RELI) 1 RELIGIOUS STUDIES (RELI) Faculty Professors: Maria A. Antonaccio, Karline M. McLain, Rivka Ulmer, Carol Wayne White Associate Professors: Brantley Gasaway, John Penniman, Stuart Young (Chair) Assistant Professor: Ali Karjoo-Ravary Visiting Assistant Professor: April Hoelke Simpson The academic study of religion examines one of the most powerful, influential and contested forces in the world. It is critical to developing a deep understanding of different cultures and diverse perspectives necessary for living in a complex and interconnected world. Religious literacy is an integral component of a liberal arts education. The Religious Studies curriculum is among the most interdisciplinary, international and multicultural at Bucknell. Our courses offer students opportunities to study a diverse array of the world’s religions; to interpret how religion shapes and is shaped by cultural dynamics and personal practices; to grapple with enduring questions of human existence; and to develop capacities of ethical reasoning. Our courses also teach students effective research, reading, writing, oral communication and critical thinking skills that prepare them for work in a wide variety of fields. Course Areas Introductory Course RELI 100 Introduction to Religion (Select one from a variety of sections.) 1 "Western" Religious Traditions RELI 205 Hebrew 1 RELI 207 Holocaust: Event and Reception 1 RELI 209 Israel: Land, People, and Tradition 1 RELI 210 Judaism 1 RELI 212 Christianity 1 RELI 213 God, Suffering, and Evil 1 RELI 215
    [Show full text]
  • Not One World but Two. the Future in Jewish Apocalyptic Literature
    religions Article Not One World but Two. The Future in Jewish Apocalyptic Literature John Collins Yale Divinity School, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; [email protected] Received: 20 February 2019; Accepted: 25 March 2019; Published: 28 March 2019 Abstract: The Jewish apocalyptic literature that first appears in the Hellenistic period and continues into the Common Era developed a radically novel view of the future. As formulated in the apocalypse of 4 Ezra about the end of the first century CE, the Most High created not one world but two. This world must be utterly destroyed and replaced by a new creation. This view of the future is inherited in the New Testament, most strikingly in the Book of Revelation. It would have enormous but ambivalent implications for western history. On the one hand, it threatened to undermine the importance of working for a better life in this world. On the other hand, it offered hope to those who would otherwise have no hope at all. Keywords: apocalyptic; death; eschatology; resurrection; Enoch; Flood; messiah; end of the world; millennium The biblical tradition has long been celebrated for its linear view of history in contrast to the supposedly circular views of history that dominated the ancient Near East. (Dentan 1955). Perceptions of the common Near Eastern view were formed largely on the basis of the great creation myths such as the Babylonian Enuma Elish and the Ugaritic Baal Cycle, which posited a conflict between a god of life and fertility (Marduk, Baal) against forces of chaos and death (Tiamat, Mot, Yamm), which was re-enacted yearly in the cult.
    [Show full text]
  • On the “Post-Religious” Political Theology of Walter Benjamin
    Messianism without Delay: On the “Post-religious” Political Theology of Walter Benjamin Giacomo Marramao 1. The interpretive key to Walter Benjamin’s “Theses On the Philosophy of History” which I intend to bring to light, can be deliberately and provocatively expressed in the title: “Mes- sianism without Delay.” This is literally a para-doxical title which seemingly contrasts with commonsense or current opinion with regard to those characteristics traditionally attributed to the “messianic.” How is it possible, in a literal sense, to have a messianism without “hori- zon of delay?” And does not the lack of a ‘wait’ constitute sufficient reason for dissolving the very tension implied in the concept of a “messiah” itself? It is my firm conviction that one finds hidden here the secret cipher of a text – at once translucent and enigmatic – which can only be thoroughly grasped by reconstructing the multi-polar constellations of its con- ceptual and symbolic referents. That is, one cannot interpret its radical political-theological core simply as a “secularized” version of messianism (as occurs in the philosophies of history criticized by Karl Lowith¨ 1): Benjamin’s brand of messianism is in equal measure post-secular and post-religious. In short, the paradox of Benjamin’s message of redemption lies in its position on the other side of the ambiguous Janus profile of western Futurism. It is symbolized, on the one hand, by the promise of salvation in monotheistic religions and, on the other, by the modern philosophy of history’s faith in progress. Hence, I will try to illustrate how the singular figure of a “messianism without delay” is tied to the proposal of a “concept of history” not after the end of history, but rather, after the end of the faith in history.
    [Show full text]
  • Messianic Hopes and Messianic Figures in Late Antiquity
    MESSIANIC HOPES AND MESSIANIC FIGURES IN LATE ANTIQUITY Craig A. Evans Acadia Divinity College The nature and importance of messianism for early Judaism and Christianity continue to be debated. Its definition and how far back it may be traced are among the points that are the most sharply disputed. Another important question concerns the extent to which messianism played a role in the shaping of the theologies of various expressions of Judaism and Christianity.1 For example, was messianism a central or fundamental tenet in early Judaism, as it came to be for Christianity? This essay will address all of these questions, and will attempt a sketch of the origins, development, forms, and influence of messianism in late antiquity. A chronological ap- proach will be taken, beginning with the (1) idealization of David and proto-messianism in the Old Testament, (2) intertestamental expressions of messianism, (3) “messianic” figures in the Roman period, and (4) messianic ideas in Christianity and rabbinic Judaism. This chronology, of course, is only approximate, for items in the respective categories will sometimes overlap. I. IDEALIZATION OF DAVID AND PROTO-MESSIANISM Idealization of the Davidic dynasty is ancient, reaching back to the time of the dynasty itself, at least in its later life.2 The messianic trajectory begins with the emergence of 1 In this connection we need to be reminded of the helpful qualification offered by Marinus de Jonge (“Messiah,” ABD 4.777-88): “Because a central tenet of Christianity has always been the conviction that Jesus was the Christ (the Messiah expected by Israel), much attention has been paid to the study of Jewish expectations of the Messiah.
    [Show full text]
  • The Separate Nature of the Religious Accommodations for the Palestinian-Arab Minority in Israel, 5 Nw
    Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights Volume 5 | Issue 1 Article 2 Fall 2007 The epS arate Nature of the Religious Accommodations for the Palestinian-Arab Minority in Israel Michael Mousa Karayanni Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr Recommended Citation Michael Mousa Karayanni, The Separate Nature of the Religious Accommodations for the Palestinian-Arab Minority in Israel, 5 Nw. J. Int'l Hum. Rts. 41 (2007). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr/vol5/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2006 by Northwestern University School of Law Volume 5, Issue 1 (Fall 2006) Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights The Separate Nature of the Religious Accommodations for the Palestinian-Arab Minority in Israel Michael M. Karayanni* I. INTRODUCTION ¶1 For Israelis, religious affiliation means much more than an expression of freedom of conscience. Religious identity can also serve as a connecting factor between the self and a legal system.1 A person’s religion in Israel will serve to identify the governing law in a number of family law matters just as the place where a tort has been committed, the place of a contract, or the place of domicile can serve as factors identifying the governing law of a certain relationship. The most evident example of this is the law governing matters of marriage and divorce: Israeli citizens are governed by their religious community court and religious community law in such matters.2 This reality of having one’s personal law, instead * Vice-Dean and holder of the Edward S.
    [Show full text]