1974. the Plan for School Facilities Is Preceded by a Summary Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1974. the Plan for School Facilities Is Preceded by a Summary Of -DO C 1.")62112 RESt Pt2 ED 032 724 EF 003 471 Capita! Prosrz.m. School District of Phladelphia: July 1._1968 to June 30. 1974.. "Philadelphia Board of Education. PS. Pub Date 27 May 68 Note -112p. - EDRS Price MF -50501-IC -$5.70 Descriptors *Budgets. *Capta! Outlay (for Fixed Assets). Construction Costs. Construction Programs. Educational Planning. Facility Reciu:rerr.2nts. *Financial Support. Master Mans, School Construction. *School Expansion This report presents the School District of Philadelphia's long-range plan for school facilities and. based upon it. a capitalprogram for the years 1969 through 1974. The plan for school facilities is preceded bya summary of present facility conditions and a consideration of indicated needs for expansion. General fiscal policies. a total ,program summary. targets for accomplishment. proi_ect descriptions. and the 1969 capital budget are presented in the capitalprogram. Photographs and graphic illustrations are included. (FS) CAPITAL PROGRAM SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA JULY 1, 1968 TO JUNE 30, 1974 PREPARED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT AND STAFF OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF EDUCATION ON MAY 27, 1968 RICHARDSON DILWORTH, ESQ., President REV. HENRY H. NICHOLS, Vice President GERALD A. GLEESCN, JR. ESQ. MR. WILLIAM GOLDMAN MRS. ALBERT M. GREENFIELD MR. GEORGE HUTT JONATHAN E. RHOADS, M.D. MR. WILLIAM ROSS ROBERT M. SEBASTIAN, ESQ. DR. MARK R. SHEDD, Superintendent U.S. DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH. EDUCATION& WELFARE tL Off la Of EDUCATION Va) THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCEDEXACTLY AS RECEIVED ;ROM l'HE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING ITPOINTS Of VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE Of EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Superintendent I.Introduction and Summary 1 A.The Goals of the Philadelphia Schools 1 B. HicAligbts of the Report 2 II.The Plan for School Facilities .7 A.Summary of Present Conditions 7 Age and Condition of Present Schools Site Area Standards Overcrowding Pattern of Racial Distribution in Existing Schools Socio-Economic Structure of the City 11 B.The Facility Gap 11 School Capacities 13 Student Enrollment Projections 14 Grades 1-12 14 Kindergarten 14 Pre-School 14 C.The Plan 19 Physical Planning Standards 19 The Educational Basis of tie Plan 19 Design Criteria to Meet Educational Requirements = .21 Des_gn Criteria 21 Internal Space Standards 24 The Elements of the Plan 25 Lower Schools 25 Middle Schools 26 High Schools 27 Community Schools 28 Magnet Schools 28 Facilities for Handicapped Children 29 Intensive Learning Centers 29 Athletic Facilities 29 Instructional Materials Centers (Libraries) 29 Alterations and Improvements 30 The Education Park 31 Other Planning Studies 33 Administrative Facilities 34 Integration and Community Renewal 35 The Plan and Integration 35 The Plan and Community Renewal 37 Space Stretching 41 TABLE OF CoNTENTS ACont'd 111. The Capital Program July 1, 193.-4 June 43 A. General Fiscal Policies. a 43 Debt Policy 43 Debt Service .44 Brird Life .44 Projeo Analysis 44 ct.st 1--"1ors .. 44 seethma 1 z at ion a 44 Consolidatien of Past Budgets 48 B.Total Program Summary 48 C. Getting the Job Done 48 The Construction Industry 48 Effects Upon Operating Costs 48 Administrative Management 5) Making the Schools Work Effectively 52 Site Selection 52 Land Acquisition 53 The Record of the Current Year 53 D. Targets for Accomplish. Lent 63 E.Project Descriptions 68 F.The 1969 Capital Budget and the Capital Program (1969-1974) 94 iii INDEX OF CAPITALPROGRAM PROJECTS Page Project Project Program Number Name DescriptionFunding NEW SCHOOLS HIGH 103 West Philadelphia-UniversityU City 104 West Philadelphia Area 68 94 69 105 Eastwick 94 204 North Philadelphia Area 69 94 205 Christopher Columbus 73 94 207 South of Vine Street 73 94 73 403 West of Schuylkill River 96 78 502 Edison High School Vicinity 96 503 William Penn 82 98 82 504 Kensingtcn High School Vicinity*y 98 82 606 Northwest 98 85 98 708 Vicinity of Olney and Frankford High Schools . 807 Northeast Philadelphia Area 88 100 90 100 NEW SCHOOLS MIDDLE 114 Jeannette MacDonald 115 George W. Pepper 69 94 69 117 Dr. John P. Turner 94 69 121 West Philadelphia Area 94 70 214 Fairmount Area 94 74 312 Steddart 94 76 314 To Serve District 3 96 76 415 Connie Mack 96 78 96 416 North of Diamond S4.reet 79 417 James L. McDevitt 96 79 418 Betsy Ross 96 419 Parkside Area 79 96 79 420 West of Schuylkill River 96 79 96 421 South of Lehigh Avenue 422 Tioga Area 80 96 514 East of Broad Street 80 96 82 515 2nd and Berks Vicinity 98 83 98 612 Central Germantown 615 Awbury Tract 85 98 86 West Oak Lane Area 98 86 712 East Oak Lane 98 88 713 Logan Area 100 88 100 811 Benjamin Rush 90 160 813 Austin Meehan 90 815 100 Betveen Washington and Northeast High Schools 90 816 To Serve District 8 100 91 817 To Serve District 8 100 91 100 iV Page Project Project Program Number Name Description Funding NEW SCHOOLS LOWER 135 Longstreth 70 94 138 Morton 70 94 145 Samuel H. Daroff 71 94 149 Owen J. Roberts 71 94 150 3. Barry 71 94 233 Bache 74 94 247 Albert M. Greenfield 75 96 250 Eugene V. Alessandroni 75 96 255 North of Darrah 75 96 429 Hanna 80 96 430 Heston 80 96 435 Richard R. Wright 80 96 437 Overbrook 81 98 438 T. M. Pierce 81 98 444 Lehigh , 81 98 526 Elkin 83 98 530 Hackett 83 98 533 Hunter 83 98 535 McKinley 84 98 539 Potter-Thomas 84 98 541 Sheppard 84 98 546 Vicinity of 2nd and Berks 84 98 637 Upper Roxborough 87 98 639 Steel 87 98 646 Oak Lane Area 87 98 740 Olney 88 100 748 Wright-;Buhr 89 100 750 Cramp 89 100 ADDITIONS HIGH 101 Bartram 68 94 401 Gratz 78 96 601 Central 85 98 603 Roxborough 85 98 V Page Project Project Program Number Name Description Funding ADDITIONS LOWER 130 Harrington 70 94 132 0. W. Holmes 70 94 148 T. B. Read '11 94 153 Bryant 72 94 154 Cary 72 94 226 Childs 74 94 241 Poe 74 94 245 E. M. Stanton 74 94 251 Bregy 75 96 330 Kearny 76 96 342 Spring Garden 76 9E: 344 Taggart 77 96 443 Whittier 81 98 534 Ludlow 83 58 555 S. A. Douglas 84 98 629 Levering 86 98 630 Logan 86 98 742 Smedley 89 100 746 Ziegler 89 100 827 Holme 91 100 837 Com ly 91 100 ADDITIONS SPECIAL SCHOOLS 893 Shallcross Residential 91 100 CONVERSIONS 102 West Philadelphia High Conversion to Middle 68 94 202 J. F. Kennedy Center 73 94 MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS 001 Supportive Facilities 93 100 010 Alterations and Improvements 92 100 020 Furniture and Equipment 93 100 030 Special Education Facilities 93 100 040 Site Expansion and Demolition 93 100 060 Athletic Facilities 92 100 070 Administrative Facilities 92 100 090 Capital Program Administration Cost 92 100 vi ILIXSTRATI0NS-MAPS-TABLES Page IllustrationI Non-Fire Resistant Buildings 8 Map 1 Racial Balance and Change (October 196G - October 1967) 9 Map 2 Need for Renewal 10 Table 1 Overcrowded Schools by District 11 Map 3 Facilities Gap 12 Table 2 Lower School Planning Capacities 13 Table 3 Pupil Enrollment By Grade Group, By Race 1970-1980 15 Table 4 Estimated Kindergarten Enrollment 16 Table 5 Estimated Pre-School Demand and Enrollment 16 Table 6 Summary of Physical Planning Standards 20 Illustration2 Instruction Material Center Plan - Lower School 26 Illustration3 House Complex - Middle School 27 Illustration4 House Plan - High School 28 Illustration5 Master Plan - Northwest High School 32 Illustration6 Anticipated Expenditures by Year 46 Illustration'7 Anticipated Expenditures by Purpose 47 Table 7 Borrowing Capacity 50 Table 8 Summary of Impact on Operating Budget 51 Illustration8 Typical Operating Costs 54 Table 9 Projects Completed January 1, 1962 - June 30, 1968 56 Illustration9 Projects Completed January 1, 1962June 30, 1968 57 Illustration10 Total Expenditures Capital Budget 57 Table 10 Major Projects Under Construction 58 Table 11 Major Projects Under Itudy and Design 60 Map 4 City Wards by School District. 62 Table 12 Targets for Accomplishment 63 Map 5 Existing Schools 64 Map 6 Schools in 1969-1974 Program 65 vii LETTER FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT To the President and Members of the Board of Education I am pleased to transmit to you my recommendations for the School District's Capital Budget for 1969 and its Capital Program for the ensuing years from 1970 to 1974. For the past two years, the School District, under your leadership, has been embarked upon a mas- sive campaign to overcome the pent-up space needs of Philadelphia's schools.This ye.ar, I can report that this space race is beginning to be won. For the opening of school this coming fall, .ve anticipate that there will be 5 new schools in operation and completed additions to 8 other buildings. Together with al- terations and improvements to dozens of existing schools, renot ation of space at such facilities as the Innovative Center at 5th and Luzerne Streets and other efforts mentioned in the rep9rt, a substantial in- road on the School District's major problemovercrowdingwill have been made. In addition to these immediate results, some 16 new schools and 24 additions to existing schools are under design or construction at this time.These include 24 lower schools, S middle schools, 9 high schools and 2 special facilities.Thirteen of these new schools are scheduled to open in the fall of 1969 alone.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2014
    CLIMB ON annual report 2014 A WORD FROM OUR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR POBS RESULTS IN 2014 FINANCIALS Dear Friends: UNAUDITED FOR 2014 $63,000 RESTRICTED OPERATIONAL 2014 was an adventurous year at the Philadelphia Outward SINGLE- AND MULTI-DAY COURSE OFFERINGS POBS REVENUE OVERVIEW 2014: FUNDS Bound School. $1,485,000 2012 2013 2014 You may have met one of the 4,100 students who participated 120 in one of our experiential education programs this past 110 year. You may have spoken with one of our instructors who collectively delivered 9,191 student program days in 2014. 95 100 Or, you may have seen us in the news during our annual Building Adventure event in mid-October where over 120 78 80 people rappelled 31 stories (418 feet) from the top of One Logan Square in Center City. The Philadelphia Outward Bound School is the “school” that inspires leadership and 5755 60 service to communities through single and multi-day 51 outdoor experiences that change lives through challenge and discovery. 40 2014 In truth, the Philadelphia Outward Bound School is not a 21 20 REVENUE traditional educational institution. We educate by “doing,” 11 12 10 $805,000 $617,000 and our students find us through our many partnerships 5 6 TOTAL FUNDS PROGRAM TUITION & with schools and youth-serving organizations across the 0 RAISED CO-PAYS greater Philadelphia metropolitan region. Together, with these educational partners, we inspire more than 4,000 SHORT LONG CORPORATE ONE-DAY EXPEDITION EXPEDITION TEAMBUILDING INSIGHT youth to be more than they thought they could be - and to (</= 7 DAYS) (8+ DAYS) PROGRAMS PROGRAMS graduate from high school, to finish college and to return home to make their world a better place.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Officer Report – Olney Charter High School
    BOARD OF EDUCATION THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA In the Matter of: Charter Nonrenewal Proceeding Regarding Olney Charter High School HEARING OFFICER’S REPORT The Hearing Officer submits this report regarding the hearing conducted in this matter, together with the attached findings of fact, conclusions of law, proposed adjudication and certification of the record. Rudolph Garcia, Esquire HEARING OFFICER 235 Lloyd Lane Wynnewood, PA 19096 www.RudolphGarcia.com Direct: 610-986-1061 [email protected] Date: September 19, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS HEARING OFFICER’S REPORT I. PROCEDURAL POSTURE .....................................................................................................1 II. GROUNDS FOR NONRENEWAL OF OLNEY’S CHARTER .............................................5 A. Material Violations of Charter Standards and Conditions ................................................7 1. Olney failed to meet charter conditions for Renaissance Schools. ............................8 2. Olney has not achieved the performance expected of Renaissance Schools. ....................................................................................................................10 3. Olney failed to meet charter requirements for Statements of Financial Interest. .....................................................................................................13 4. Olney failed to meet charter requirements for Highly Qualified Teachers. ..................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • The Calendar of the School District of Philadelphia September 2009 to July 2010 2009-2010 SRC CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE
    Merlin Thomas, Greenberg School, 2009 The Calendar of The School District of Philadelphia September 2009 to July 2010 2009-2010 SRC CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE To the Entire School District Community: I ask for your partnership moving forward because we all have a role to play. Teachers must strive for excellence in the classroom. Administrators must Welcome back to school for the 2009-2010 academic year. I am truly support teachers and create excellent schools. Parents and guardians must excited to be a part of The School District of Philadelphia during what is ensure that their children are at school on time every day and prepared to going to be an exhilarating year full of change and opportunity for our learn. Above all, students must embrace learning, participate in class, com- students, parents/guardians, teachers and administrators. plete homework assignments, and study hard. One of the School Reform Commission’s first actions at the time I was There is much work to be done this year and many decisions to be made named Chairman was to approve a strategic plan for the School District, about how the vision in our strategic plan will be realized. However, I Imagine 2014. I was impressed with how a community as large and diverse have been inspired by what the School District community has achieved as the School District community could work together over many months thus far and am confident that together much will be accomplished this to articulate a common vision for what high-quality education means and school year. then develop a specific plan for achieving it.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Instructions Submission Instructions
    SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS Applicants must respond to each question/item in each section of the application. Incomplete applications will not be considered. Electronic Application Process Applicants are required to complete and submit the application, including all required attachments to: [email protected] The application and all required attachments must be submitted before 5:00 p.m. on May 21, 2010 to be considered for the first list to be posted on the website. Applications will be received after May 21 on an ongoing basis and will be reviewed in the order in which they are received. There will be NO exceptions made to the May 17 application deadline to be considered for the first posted list. Applicants must respond to each question/item in each section of the application. Incomplete applications will not be considered. Please make sure you complete the application as early as possible so that we may help you correct any problems associated with technical difficulties. Technical support will be available Monday – Friday, throughout the application period, from 9:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. All information included in the application package must be accurate. All information that is submitted is subject to verification. All applications are subject to public inspection and/or photocopying. Contact Information All questions related to the preferred provider application process should be directed to: Mark Coscarella Interim Supervisor Office of Education Improvement & Innovation OR Anne Hansen or Bill Witt Consultants Office of Education Improvement & Innovation Telephone: (517) 373-8480 or (517) 335-4733 Email: [email protected] Michigan Department of Education 2010-11 Section 1003(g) School Improvement Grants Preferred External Educational Services Provider Application 1 EXTERNAL PROVIDERS: BACKGROUND & APPROVAL PROCESS Under the Final Requirements for School Improvements Grants, as defined under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended, Title I, Part A.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix EE.09 – Cultural Resources
    Appendix EE.09 – Cultural Resources Tier 1 Final EIS Volume 1 NEC FUTURE Appendix EE.09 - Cultural Resources: Data Geography Affected Environment Environmental Consequences Context Area NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE State County Existing NEC including Existing NEC including Existing NEC including Preferred Alternative Preferred Alternative Preferred Alternative Hartford/Springfield Line Hartford/Springfield Line Hartford/Springfield Line DC District of Columbia 10 21 0 10 21 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 49 249 0 54 248 0 MD Prince George's County 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 23 0 1 23 0 MD Anne Arundel County 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 MD Howard County 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 MD Baltimore County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 10 0 MD Baltimore City 3 44 0 3 46 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 25 212 0 26 213 0 MD Harford County 0 5 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 12 0 1 15 0 MD Cecil County 0 6 2 0 8 2 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 11 2 0 11 2 DE New Castle County 3 64 2 3 67 2 0 2 1 0 5 2 3 187 1 4 186 2 PA Delaware County 0 4 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 1 18 0 PA Philadelphia County 9 85 1 10 87 1 0 2 1 3 4 1 57 368 1 57 370 1 PA Bucks County 3 8 1 3 8 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 15 1 3 15 1 NJ Burlington County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17 0 1 17 0 NJ Mercer County 1 9 1 1 10 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 5 40 1 6 40 1 NJ Middlesex County 1 20 2 1 20 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 42 2 1 42 2 NJ Somerset County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 NJ Union County 1 9 1 1 10 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 2 17 1 2 17 1 NJ Essex County 1 24 1 1 26 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 65 1 1 65 1 NJ Hudson County
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 City of Philadelphia Summer Camps, Programs and Activities
    200420042004 CityCityCity ofofof PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaPhiladelphia SummerSummerSummer Camps,Camps,Camps, ProgramsProgramsPrograms andandand ActivitiesActivitiesActivities Letter to Come City of Philadelphia 2004 Summer Camps, Programs and Activities Overnight Camps 2 Day Camps Department of Recreation City of Philadelphia Community Day Camps 4 Freedom Schools School District of Philadelphia Summer Camps 16 Philadelphia Dept of Recreation G.R.E.A.T. (Gang Resistance Education & Training) 18 Center City 20 North Philadelphia 26 Kensington/Frankford/Lower Northeast 40 West Philadelphia/Overbrook/Wynnefield 44 Oak Lane/Olney/Logan/Nicetown/East Falls 54 Germantown/Mt. Airy/Chestnut Hill 63 Upper Northeast 70 South Philadelphia 78 Roxborough/Manayunk 86 Southwest Philadelphia 88 Philadelphia Suburbs 92 1 Overnight Camps Day Camps Camp Woodrock Camp Ladore 1229 Chestnut Street Suite M7 19125 701 N. Broad Street 19123 Woodrock, Inc.s Salvation Army Overnight camp offers six 1 week encampments, with a mission Two 1 week reduced-fee residential summer encampments in the to build cultural competencies. Activities include ropes, ceramic Pocono Mountains for children whose parents could not otherwise arts, hiking, sports, drama, and music (focusing on Africa, the afford to send them to camp. Swimming, arts & crafts, canoeing, Caribbean and Latin America). Transportation is provided to this ropes, hiking, campfire activities, and more. Transportation Pottstown, PA camp from Kensington and North Philadelphia provided. Fees vary according to family income. neighborhoods. Fee is $60 per session. Phone: 215-787-2818 Phone: 215-231-9810 Web Site: www.salvationarmyphiladelphia.org Web Site: www.woodrock.org Eligibility: Ages 6-12 Eligibility: Ages 8-12 Hours: July 8 - 14, 2004, August 4 - 9, 2004 Hours: July 5 - 28, 2004 Contact: Karl Dreher Camp Hidden Falls Camp Nazarene PO Box 27540 19118 3975 Germantown Avenue 19140 Girl Scouts of Southeastern Pennsylvania Nazarene Baptist Church Residential camp in the Pocono Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Chart of Accounts Manual
    SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA Chart Of Accounts Manual Business Rules and Definitions Office of Comptroller May 24, 2011 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Policies and Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 1 3. ABC (Chart of Account) Code Structure ................................................................................................ 1 3.1 Expenditures ................................................................................................................................. 2 3.2 Revenues ....................................................................................................................................... 3 4. Chart of Account Element Definitions and General Usage ................................................................... 3 4.1 Fund .............................................................................................................................................. 3 4.1.1 Fund Categories .................................................................................................................... 4 4.1.2 Majord Fun Groups and Types – GASB 34 Definitions .......................................................... 5 4.1.3 SDP Fund Groupings .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The School District of Philadelphia Charter Schools (2009/2010)
    The School District of Philadelphia Charter Schools (2009/2010) Math, Science and Tech (K-12) 16 " Phila. Academy (HS) (9-12) " " Phila. Academy (ES) (K-8) 15 54 Media Tech (1/2) (5-12) " Tacony Academy (K-4) 14 18 50 " 11 52 " Hope (9-12) 3" 8" 26 Green Woods (K-8) West Oak Lane (K-8) " 19 " Imhotep (9-12) Global Leadership (2/2) (1-8) 28 Khepera (K-8) " 36 44 20 " 41 49 New Foundations (K-8) Mastery (Picke"tt) (7-10) Del. Valley (9-12) Germantown (North) (5"-6) " " Imani (K-8) 27 24 35 " Esperanza (9-12) " Planet Abacus (K-5) " DeHostos (K-4) Northwood (1/2) (K-8) " 40 " Franklin Towne HS (9-12) Eastern University (7-9) " " Maritime (5-12) " Wissahickon (K-8) Sankofa (K-4, 9) " Pantoja (K-8) N"orthwood (2"/2) (K-7) Multi-Cultural (9-12) " Franklin Towne ES (K-5) 29 " Truebright (7-11)Comm. Academy (K-12) " First Philadelphia (K-7) " Ad Prima (K-7) 32 " 33 34 KIPP (5-8)Bracetti (6-12) 31 " 37 " "Laboratory (2/3) (2-7) " Laboratory (3/3) (K-1) 22 Pan American (K-5) " " All"iance (1/2) (K-5) Mastery (Shoemaker) (7-11)Discovery (K-8) " " 21 Alliance (2/2) (K-1) " 25 " Global Le"adership (1/2) (K-8) Youth Build (UG) 51 Harambee (K-8) "Belmont Academy (K-4) Belmont (K-8) " 30 23 39 West Phila. Achievement (K-5) Boys Latin (9-11) " 04 03 07 06 KIPP (West) (5) " 02 " 43 46 Renaissance Adv.
    [Show full text]
  • Germantown High School Proposed Action: Designation Property Owner: 5301 Germantown Avenue Investment Partners; 5901 Germantown Ave In
    ADDRESS: 5901-13 AND 5915-41 GERMANTOWN AVE & 61-71 AND 73 E HAINES ST Name of Resource: Germantown High School Proposed Action: Designation Property Owner: 5301 Germantown Avenue Investment Partners; 5901 Germantown Ave In. Nominator: Germantown United CDC, The Keeping Society of Philadelphia Staff Contact: Meredith Keller, [email protected], 215-686-7660 OVERVIEW: This nomination proposes to designate the properties at 5901-13 and 5915-41 Germantown Avenue and 61-71 and 73 E. Haines Street, four individual parcels that comprise the former Germantown High School, and list them on the Philadelphia Register of Historic Places. The nomination contends that the buildings satisfy Criteria for Designation A, C, D, G, H, I, and J. Under Criterion A, the nomination argues that Germantown High School represents a pivotal moment in the history of public education in Philadelphia in response to Pennsylvania’s 1914 passing of the Cox Child Labor Law, which restricted work hours for children and allowed them to enroll in secondary schools. Under Criteria C and D, the nomination contends that the original building is a monumental example of Georgian Revival public school architecture and is reflective of the style of other Philadelphia school buildings constructed in the same period. Under Criterion G, the nomination argues that the open space separating the school buildings from Germantown Avenue was intentionally developed into a park-like setting to serve the high school. Under Criterion H, the nomination argues that the open space embodies “an important visual continuum along Germantown Avenue, a singular place that has offered the public a window to architectural and landscape beauty and grandeur since the 1850s.” Under Criterion I, the nomination contends that portions of the property that comprise the open space along Germantown Avenue potentially contain archaeological resources related to seventeenth-, eighteenth-, and early nineteenth-century structures.
    [Show full text]
  • School Facilities Survey
    DCCUMENT RESUME ED 036 072 EE 002 618 AUTHOR SAUNDERS, HARRY E. TITLE SCHOOL FACILITIES SUEVEY., INSTITUTION PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF EDUCATION, PA. PUB DATE MAR 65 NOTE 240P.; A REPORT PRESENTED TO THESUPERINTENDENT CF SCHOOLS AND THE BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATIONOF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENN. AVAILABLE FROM PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF EDUCATION, PARKWAYAT 21ST, PHILADELPHIA, PENN. 19103 EDRS PRICE EDRS PRICE MF-$1.00 EC NOT AVAILABLEFROM EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *EDUCAIICNAI ADMINISTRATION, EDUCATIONALFINANCE, EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES, EDUCATIONALPOLICY, ENROLLMENT TRENDS, *FACILITY CASE STUDIES,*FACIIITY EXPANSION, *FACILITY REQUIREMENTS,SCHOOL EXPANSION, *SCHOOL PLANNING ABSTRACT THIS SURVEY OF FACILITY NEEDSINCLUDES AN EVALUATION OF STAFF ORGANIZATION AND OPERATINGPROCEDURES FOR THE PHILADELPHIA PUBLIC SCHCO.L DISTRICT. THE EDUCATIONALPOLICIES ADOPTED BY THE PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF EDUCATION RELATINGTO SCHOOL FACILITIES ARE DISCUSSED, AND EXISTING SITES ANDBUILDINGS, POPULATION ENROLLMENT DATA, AND FINANCIAL DATA ARE REVIEWED.BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION, STATEMENTS CCNCERNING NEW SCHOOL ANDEXISTING SCHOOL CAPITAL NEEDS ARE PRESENTED; SPECIAL ATTENTION ISGIVEN TO PRE-SCHOOL, KINDERGARTEN, AND ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES.THE ORGANIZATION, OBJECTIVES, AND FUNCTIONS OF THE SCHOOLFACILITIES DIVISION ARE DISCUSSED, AND RECOMMENDATIONS CCNCERNINGPOLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE PRESENTED. A TEN-YEAR CAPITALIMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IS PRESENTED IN THE FINAL CHAPTER, WHICH IS SEPARATELYBOUND AND IS NOT PART OF THIS DOCUMENT. (FS) SCHOOLFACILITIES SURVEY A report presentedto the Superintendent of Schools and the Board ofPublic Education of the Cityof Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEENREPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THEPERSON OR ORGAN!ZATION ORIGINATING ITPOINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DONOT NECES- SARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICEOF EDU- CATION POSITION OR POLICY, by HARRY B.
    [Show full text]
  • Dickinson Alumnus, September 1942
    DICKINSON ALUMNUS / Vol. 20, No. 1 I / Soptemb.,, 1942 I I The N_ew The History of JAMES WILSON Dickinson College HOTEL BY CARLISLE, PA. James Henry Morgan, Ph. D., D. D., LLD . • "The book every Dickinsonian should Headquarters for have in his library and read." DI c KIN s 0 NIAN s • $3.50 Postpaid Send orders with remittance made payable to Dickinson College, Carlisle, -B. S. SwARTZ, Owner Pa. Whenever You VISIT IN. CARLISLE ... You CAN SPEND THE NrGHT AT THE NEw GEORGIAN HALL ONE MILE WEST OF CAMP HILL ON THE CARLISLE , HARRISBURG PIKE Rooms $r.25 and $I.50 Per Person GEORGE W. BARNITZ, '14, OWNER When You Come Back to Carlisle Don't Forget to Visit Your Old Friends KRONENBERG'S "The College Store" In the New Fireproof Kronenberg Building PROFESSION AL CARDS R. R. McWHINNEY C. W. SIIARP, '14 LAW Attorney-at-Law Attorney-at-Law 1303 Berger Building, Pittsburgh, Pa. Baltimore, l\l<l. LESTER S. IIECIIT, '15 !<'HYSINGER EVANS Attorney-at-Law Attorney and Counsellor-at-Law 322 Ln nd Title lluilding, 1616 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pa. PhilnJelphia, Pa. ROSCOE B. S~HTII MALCOLl\1 B. STERRETT, Attorney-at-Law '00, '02L 705 Coal Exchange Building Attorney-at-Law 140 North Orange Avenue Wilkes-B::irre, Pa. Orlando, l!'lorida CLAYTON IIOFF1\1AN Attorney-at-Law "Songs of Geo. D. Darter Bank Ill<lg. Canton, Ohio Dickinson'' GEORGE 1\1. STEVENS, '22L • Counsellor-at-Law 1937 Edition :\l11rket et Fifth Street. • Camdeu. N. J. A new volume in two parts edited by Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition to High School: School "Choice"
    Transition to High School School “Choice” & Freshman Year in Philadelphia RESEARCH FOR ACTION FEBRUARY 2010 RESEARCH FOR ACTION Research for Action (RFA) is a Philadelphia-based, nonprofit organization engaged in policy and evaluation research on urban education. Founded in 1992, RFA seeks to improve the education opportunities and outcomes of urban youth by strengthening public schools and enriching the civic and community dialogue about public education. For more information about RFA, please go to our website, www.researchforaction.org. Learning from Philadelphia’s School Reform This report is one of a series on Philadelphia high schools. For education researchers and advo- cates, supporting and improving our public high schools is one of the most critical goals, as well as one of the most daunting challenges. RFA is committed to conducting research that can help identify the strategies that can make the biggest difference for high schools. Through mixed method, multi-year studies we examine: initiatives to improve persistently low-performing high schools, efforts to increase teacher effectiveness, supports for struggling learners, and access and readiness for college and career. RFA’s work on high schools is supported by grants from the William Penn Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, and the Ford Foundation. This report is available for free on the RFA website—www.researchforaction.org—or in hard copy, $5 per copy shipping and handling. The policy briefs based on this report are available for free on the website. Other recent RFA publications focused solely or in part on high schools include: Christman, J. B., Brown, D., Burgess, S., Kay, J., Maluk, H.
    [Show full text]