U4 Helpdesk Answer U4 Helpdesk Answer 2021:12 23 April 2021 AUTHOR Kenya: Corruption and Jorum Duri (TI) devolution
[email protected] The effect of devolution on corruption is ambiguous. On the REVIEWED BY one hand, bringing government closer to the people could Guillaume Nicaise (U4) increase transparency and accountability. On the other hand,
[email protected] devolution of government may also result in devolution of corruption as the local governments become prone to Mary Maneno and Fidialice Wanjiru corruption challenges such as capture by local elites, bribery Muthike (Transparency International in provision of services to citizens and patronage systems. Kenya)
[email protected] Kenya introduced the concept of devolution in the 2010 constitution. Although devolution has brought some success in bringing the government closer to Kenyan citizens and RELATED U4 MATERIAL advancing development, evidence show that corruption is a major challenge affecting county governments. Nonetheless, Kenya: overview of corruption various legal and institutional frameworks are in place which and anti-corruption may be useful to address corruption in the devolved Corruption in community-driven government. In addition, various donor-funded devolution development. A Kenyan case programmes support transparency and accountability in study with insights from Indonesia Kenyan counties. Helpdesk Answers are tailor-made research briefings compiled in ten working days. The U4 Helpdesk is a free research service run in collaboration with Transparency International. Query Please provide a Helpdesk Answer on corruption and devolution in Kenya, including a section on advantages/disadvantages of devolution to counter corruption as well as examples of how anti-corruption measures can be integrated into devolution programmes.