Downloads/Icmm Iucn Bioper Inbrief 11 14 .Pdf [Accessed 15 Apr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Downloads/Icmm Iucn Bioper Inbrief 11 14 .Pdf [Accessed 15 Apr A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Conserving nature power: An exploration of biodiversity offsetting in Europe and beyond Andrea Christiane Brock Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations University of Sussex May 2018 i I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be submitted in whole or in part to another university for the award of any other degree. Name: Andrea Christiane Brock Signature:.................................................................... ii Summary This dissertation draws on multi-sited fieldwork to understand the history and development of biodiversity offsetting in Europe and beyond. It situates offsetting as a social technology of governance in the management of resistance and dissent against corporate and state degradation and violence, and as an instrument to flexibilise restrictive legislation imposing limits to industrial expansion in Europe. I analyse offsetting through the lens of corporate and state power and violence, contextualising it in the dominant social economic order, exploring its role in the advancement of social control and accumulation, and in the invisibilisation and entrenchment of the epistemic, physical and slow violence(s) exercised against human and nonhuman nature, in the form of industrialism and extractivism, state control and policing of dissent. While a critical literature on offsetting now contributes to our understanding of the tensions, politics and value struggles around offsetting, it has tended to focus on the ‘novel’ commodification and marketisation aspects of offsetting. It frequently privileges structural explanations rooted in the expansionary market logic unleashed under neoliberal capitalism, while overlooking the long history of the ideology and practice of offsetting, deeply rooted in industrialism, domestication and exploitation of human and nonhuman nature, and the need for corporate and state legitimacy in the face of (increasingly visible) social and ecological degradation and ever-more apparent failures of the green economy. By situating offsetting historically and in its political economic context, this thesis demystifies and denaturalises abstract ideas of the ‘market’. It challenges the emerging hegemony of critical analyses of offsetting that often resort to marketisation and financialisation as explanatory devices and contributes to the theorisation of the ongoing transformation of neoliberal capitalism, statehood and corporate citizenship, as part of wider processes of reconfigurations of governance that are the product of the dialectical relationship between capitalism, the state, and its critics. iii Acknowledgements This thesis would not exist without the support of my two supervisors, Pete Newell and James Fairhead, who have both been incredibly supportive not just of my dissertation project but also of the many other projects I have been involved in over the last few years. Thank you! I wouldn’t have started a PhD if it wasn’t for Henk Overbeek, and I probably wouldn’t have finished it if it wasn’t for all of the wonderful people I met on the way: my office mates, house mates and friends who have provided emotional support, inspiration and the occasional bottle of wine (or blueberry gin) throughout the years, cycled with me to Uni at 6am, danced with me in the office, listened to my problems, and gave me feedback. We laughed together, shared frustrations together and had fun together. I’ve enjoyed our endless discussions and nerdy jokes. Particular thanks to those who have read and commented on my work in the past: Xander, Sahil, Rich, Yavuz, Pedro, Maz, Dan, Sophie, Dinah, Michael, Tosca, Chris and Amber. Special thanks go to my parents, who couldn’t have been any more supportive and always there for me. And that’s although I didn’t even become a ‘proper’ scientist. Danke! I’m grateful to all of my interviewees who took the time to talk to me. The work was financially supported by the German Studies Foundation and the ESRC. Lastly, but most importantly, this work wouldn’t have been possible without the inspiration and motivation by the people fighting extractivism, oppression and ecocide around the world, imagining and living the better future we want to see. This thesis is dedicated to the Hambacher Forst, the forest defenders and all that resist the destruction of nature across the world. Love, rage and solidarity! iv Table of contents Summary ii Acknowledgements iii Table of figures v List of Abbreviations vi 1. Introduction: conserving nature or conserving power? 1 1.1. Research aims 4 1.2. Offsetting in Europe: institutionalisation and normalisation 6 1.3. Outline of this dissertation 9 1.4. Politics of this dissertation 11 1.5. Strategising methodology 13 1.6. Methods 17 1.7. Some reflections on positionality and ethics 19 2. Approaching biodiversity offsets: from financialisation to technology of governance 22 2.1. Offsetting nature – premises and critical approaches 25 2.2. Exploring ‘neoliberalism’ and its history 28 2.3. Back to Financialisation of Nature: Starting points, building blocks and departures 34 2.4. Humans, nature, non-human nature? 44 2.5. Situating violence 47 2.6. Conclusion 48 3. Making Europe’s nature offsettable: the spectacular performance of sustainability through discourse and (community of) practice 49 3.1. ‘Selling nature to save it’ – tracing discourses, ideologies and knowledge systems 50 3.2. Introducing the offsetting industry 67 3.3. The spectacular performance of conservation 77 3.4. Conclusion – enacting the theatrics of legitimising destruction through spectacle and ritual 92 4. Introducing No Net Loss: an attempt to anchor offsetting in the European political economy 94 4.1. Introducing the No Net Loss initiative... 96 4.2. Flexibilising and managing stringent EU nature legislation 103 4.3. Securing access to land and capital 113 4.4. Dealing with dissent 118 4.5. Conclusion – flexibilisation of limits and accumulation by restoration? 128 5. Green extractivism: a brief history of green mining and better coal 135 5.1. Extractivism, resistance and the state 137 5.2. The birth of ‘green mining’ and ‘better coal’ 140 5.3. From the Global Mining Initiative to the Mines, Minerals and Sustainable Development initiative 142 5.4. Offsetting mining impacts – introducing the offsetting-extraction nexus 147 5.5. Green mining of cleaner coal? 152 5.6. Conclusion 156 6. Licence to operate – licence to trash – licence to pacify? Biodiversity offsetting in the German lignite coal mining sector 159 6.1. The migrating mine 163 6.2. RWE’S political power: Lobbying and revolving doors 165 6.3. ‘Dirty coal is good for you’: engineering and buying consent through CSR, PR and outreach 171 6.4. Managing and repressing resistance: criminalisation, repression and violence 178 6.5. No net loss of trees: offsetting RWE’s coal mining impacts 184 6.6. Conclusion – cheap electricity and better nature 207 7. Greening extractivism – conserving power: conclusion 211 7.1. From Edinburgh conference centre into the ‘world’s largest hole’ – summary and main findings 212 7.2. Consolidating state power and corporate citizenship: situating offsetting as technology of governance 216 8. Bibliography 220 9. Annex 1: List of interviews 261 10. Annex 2: List of fieldwork events 262 11. Annex 3: Field visits 263 v Table of figures Figure 1 Rhinish coal region (own photos/Deicke, 2016) ............................................................ 21 Figure 2 Origins of the ecosystem concept (Gómez-Baggethun et al., 2010: 1213) ................... 57 Figure 3 Biodiversity risk as business risk (WWF, n.d.a) .............................................................. 65 Figure 4 BBOP conference sponsorship....................................................................................... 70 Figure 5 Royal opening (World Forum on Natural Capital, 2015a) .............................................. 75 Figure 6 Conference Foyer at the 2015 Natural Capital forum (World Forum on Natural Capital, 2015a) ......................................................................................................................................... 81 Figure 7 The globe as resource storage facility (World Forum on Natural Capital, 2015a) ......... 81 Figure 8 Presentation by Peter Bakker (World Forum on Natural Capital, 2015a) ...................... 82 Figure 9 Talk show-like arrangements at the 2015 Natural Capital forum (World Forum on Natural Capital, 2015a) ................................................................................................................ 83 Figure 10 Conference dinner (World Forum on Natural Capital, 2015a)..................................... 84 Figure 11 Conference summary (Forest Trends et al., 2014) ...................................................... 89 Figure 12 Bison herd on offset site (CDA, 2016) .......................................................................... 90 Figure 13
Recommended publications
  • IUCN World Conservation Congress
    S IUCN Resolutions, Recommendations and other Decisions World Conservation Congress Honolulu, Hawai‘i, United States of America 6 –10 September 2016 IUCN Resolutions, Recommendations and other Decisions World Conservation Congress Honolulu, Hawai‘i, United States of America 6–10 September 2016 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2016 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: IUCN (2016). IUCN Resolutions, Recommendations and other Decisions. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 106pp. Produced by: IUCN Publications Unit Available for download from: www.iucn.org/resources/publications Contents Foreword 5 Acknowledgements 8 Table of Resolutions, Recommendations and other Decisions 10 Resolutions 17 Recommendations 216 Other Decisions 244 Annex 1 – Explanation of votes 248 Annex 2 – Statement of the United States Government on the IUCN Motions Process 297 3 Foreword It is with great pleasure that the Resolutions Committee hereby forwards to IUCN Members, Commission members, IUCN Secretariat staff, other Congress participants and all interested parties, the Resolutions and Recommendations as well as other key decisions adopted by the Members’ Assembly at the World Conservation Congress held in Hawai‘i, United States of America, 1–10 September 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Militarization and Peaceful Protest
    Seattle Journal for Social Justice Volume 14 Issue 2 Fall 2015 Article 14 4-27-2016 Living Under the Boot: Militarization and Peaceful Protest Charlotte Guerra Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj Seattle University School of Law, [email protected] Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Agriculture Law Commons, Arts and Humanities Commons, Banking and Finance Law Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Commercial Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Disability and Equity in Education Commons, Disability Law Commons, Educational Leadership Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Energy and Utilities Law Commons, Family Law Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Housing Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Immigration Law Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Insurance Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Juvenile Law Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Land Use Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Psychology Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Legal History Commons, Legal Remedies Commons, Legislation Commons, Marketing Law Commons, National Security Law Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Other Education Commons, Other Law Commons, Privacy Law Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, Secured Transactions Commons, Securities Law Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons, Social Welfare Law Commons, Transnational Law Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation Guerra, Charlotte (2016) "Living Under the Boot: Militarization and Peaceful Protest," Seattle Journal for Social Justice: Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Judith A. Thomas 2012
    Copyright by Judith A. Thomas 2012 The Thesis Committee for Judith A. Thomas Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Live Stream Micro-Media Activism in the Occupy Movement Mediatized Co-presence, Autonomy, and the Ambivalent Face APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Karin Gwinn Wilkins Joseph D. Straubhaar Live Stream Micro-Media Activism in the Occupy Movement Mediatized Co-presence, Autonomy, and the Ambivalent Face by Judith A. Thomas, BFA Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin May 2012 Dedication For my husband, inspiration and co-conspirator, Rob Donald. (Photo: The First Adbusters’ Poster for Occupy Wall Street, September 2011. Acknowledgements The work of Manuel Castells on autonomous networks and communication power has had a profound impact on this scholarship. The breadth of his vision and theoretical analysis is inspiring and insightful. I hope this work contributes to the continuing critical cultural discussion of the potential of citizen micro-media in all contexts but especially the international uprisings of 2010-2012. Most especially, my sincere thanks to the following University of Texas at Austin professors whose knowledge and curiosity inspired me most: Joe Straubhaar, Paul Resta, Shanti Kumar, Sandy Stone, and especially my generous, gifted and patient supervisor, Karin Gwinn Wilkins. I will miss the depth and breadth of debate we shared, and I look forward to following your challenging work in the future. v Abstract Live Stream Micro-Media Activism in the Occupy Movement Mediatized Co-presence, Autonomy, and the Ambivalent Face Judith A.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Appropriateness of Wetland Mitigation Banking As a Mechanism for Securing Aquatic Biodiversity in the Grassland Biome of South Africa
    WETLAND MITIGATION BANKING ASSESSING THE APPROPRIATENESS OF WETLAND MITIGATION BANKING AS A MECHANISM FOR SECURING AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY IN THE GRASSLAND BIOME OF SOUTH AFRICA Report reference # For more information: Date: July 2007 Anthea Stephens Prepared By: Institute of Natural Resources (INR) in Grasslands Programme Manager collaboration with Centre for Environment, Agriculture and [email protected], 012 843 5000 Development (CEAD) ASSESSING THE APPROPRIATENESS OF WETLAND MITIGATION BANKING AS A MECHANISM FOR SECURING AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY IN THE GRASSLAND BIOME OF SOUTH AFRICA Prepared for National Grasslands Water Research Biodiversity Programme Commission JULY 2007 Prepared by INSTITUTE OF NATURAL RESOURCES D. Cox In collaboration with CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT, AGRICULTURE AND DEVELOPMENT Dr D. Kotze Prepared for National Grasslands Water Research Biodiversity Programme Commission EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background The National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment (NSBA) established that 30% of grasslands in South Africa are irreversibly transformed and only 2.8% are formally conserved. A Grassland Biodiversity Profile and Spatial Biodiversity Priority Assessment were undertaken for the biome which built on the outcomes of the NSBA. The assessment identified and integrated priority areas for terrestrial and river biodiversity, as well as ecosystem services for future conservation action in the grassland biome - the result being the identification of 15 priority clusters for conservation which represent 50% of the biome. The National Grasslands
    [Show full text]
  • In Seattle, Solidarity with the 'Occupy'
    FREE EACH VOLUME 30 MONTH ISSUE 11 A community-based newspaper serving the Puget Sound area since 1981 November 2011 Articles translated into six languages TheTheThe newspaper VoiceVoice of Neighborhood House In Seattle, solidarity with Don’t forget to vote by Nov. 8 This year’s general election is scheduled for Tuesday, Nov. 8, but registered voters the ‘Occupy’ movement don’t need to wait that long to cast their vote. Washington state has adopted a vote-by- BY VOICE STAFF mail system. If you are registered to vote in Washington, you should have received a “We are the 99 percent.” ballot in the mail last month. Complete your The rallying cry for the “Occupy” protest movement first ballot and follow the instructions printed appeared in New York, on Wall Street — what many see as the on the envelope to prepare it for mailing - epicenter of America’s now years-long recession. don’t forget to include a first-class postage The movement’s slogan refers to economic disparity in the stamp! United States, where the wealthiest 1 percent control more than Want to save a stamp? The King County 40 percent of the nation’s wealth. Elections Office operates drop-box loca- In the weeks since Occupy Wall Street first took root in mid- tions in Seattle and around King County. September, offshoots of the movement have sprouted around The Seattle drop-box locations are at the the country and worldwide, with demonstrations both large and King County Administration Bulding (500 small being held on every continent of the globe — including Fourth Ave.), Magnuson Park (6344 NE Antarctica.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Holzinger LV 709.049
    A. Holzinger LV 709.049 Welcome Students! At first some organizational details: 1) Duration This course LV 709.049 (formerly LV 444.152) is a one‐semester course and consists of 12 lectures (see Overview in Slide 0‐1) each with a duration of 90 minutes. 2) Topics This course covers the computer science aspects of biomedical informatics (= medical informatics + bioinformatics) with a focus on new topics such as “big data” concentrating on algorithmic and methodological issues. 3) Audience This course is suited for students of Biomedical Engineering (253), students of Telematics (411), students of Software Engineering (524, 924) and students of Informatics (521, 921) with interest in the computational sciences with the application area biomedicine and health. PhD students and international students are cordially welcome. 4) Language The language of Science and Engineering is English, as it was Greek in ancient times and Latin in mediaeval times, for more information please refer to: Holzinger, A. 2010. Process Guide for Students for Interdisciplinary WorkinComputer Science/Informatics. Second Edition, Norderstedt: BoD. http://www.amazon.de/Process‐Students‐Interdisciplinary‐Computer‐ Informatics/dp/384232457X http://castor.tugraz.at/F?func=direct&doc_number=000403422 WS 2015/16 1 A. Holzinger LV 709.049 Accompanying Reading ALL exam questions with solutions can be found in the Springer textbook available at the Library: Andreas Holzinger (2014). Biomedical Informatics: Discovering Knowledge in Big Data, New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978‐3‐319‐04528‐3
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Data Elements in Information Processing
    PB-249-530 MANAGEMENT OF DATA ELEMENTS IN INFORMATION PROCESSING U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / National Bureau of Standards SECOND NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND 1975 OCTOBER 23-24 Available by purchase from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Va. 221 Price: $9.25 hardcopy; $2.25 microfiche. National Technical Information Service U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PB-249-530 Management of Data Elements in Information Processing Proceedings of a Second Symposium Sponsored by the American National Standards Institute and by The National Bureau of Standards 1975 October 23-24 NBS, Gaithersburg, Maryland Hazel E. McEwen, Editor Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20234 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Elliot L. Richardson, Secrefary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler, Acfing Direc/or Table of Contents Page Introduction to the Program of the Second National Symposium on The Management of Data Elements in Information Processing ix David V. Savidge, Program Chairman On-Line Tactical Data Inputting: Research in Operator Training and Performance 1 Irving Alderman, Ph.D. "Turning the Corner" on MIS, A Proposed Program of Data Standards in Post-Secondary Education 9 Donald R. Arnold, Ph.D. ASCII - The Data Alphabet That Will Endure 17 Robert W. Bemer Techniques in Developing Standard Procedures for Data Editing 23 George W. Covill An Adaptive File Management Systems 45 Dennis L. Dance and Udo W. Pooch (Given by Dance) A Focus on the Role of the Data Manager 57 Ruth M, Davis, Ph.D. A Proposed Standard Routine for Generating Proposed Standard Check Characters 61 Paul -Andre Desjardins Methodology for Development of Standard Data Elements within Multiple Public Agencies 69 L.
    [Show full text]
  • Permittee-Responsible Mitigation Plan for the FM100 Pipeline Project
    Permittee-Responsible Mitigation Plan for the FM100 Pipeline Project Wildcat Hollow PRM Site Hamlin Township, McKean County, Pennsylvania National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation Prepared By: First Pennsylvania Resource, LLC. a wholly-owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC. 33 Terminal Way, Suite 445A Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Revised December 2020 Wildcat Hollow Permittee-Responsible Mitigation Plan National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Objectives............................................................................................................................ 2 3.0 Site Selection ....................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Mitigation Banking ..................................................................................................... 2 3.2 In-Lieu Fee .................................................................................................................. 2 3.3 On-Site Mitigation ...................................................................................................... 3 3.4 Local Watershed Restoration ...................................................................................... 3 3.5 Selected Mitigation Site .............................................................................................. 3 3.6 Congruence with Watershed Needs
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Results Memorandum Final.Pdf
    To: Denise Wilson, Director, Environmental Review Program – Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) From: Barr Engineering Co. Project Team Subject: Public Engagement Survey Results Date: May 3, 2021 Page: 1 Technical Memorandum To: Denise Wilson, Director, Environmental Review Program – Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) From: Barr Engineering Co. Project Team Subject: Public Engagement Survey Results Date: May 3, 2021 Project: Environmental Review Implementation Subcommittee (ERIS) Engagement (Project) 1.0 Introduction As directed by EQB’s 2020-2021 Workplan, and in response to Executive Order 19-37 on climate change, ERIS (a subcommittee of the Environmental Quality Board [EQB]) convened an Interagency Environmental Review Climate Technical Team to advise them on changes to the State Environmental Review Program requirements. Accordingly, the Environmental Review Climate Technical Team developed the DRAFT Recommendations: Integrating Climate Information into MEPA Program Requirements, dated December 2020, (DRAFT Recommendations). The DRAFT Recommendations specified an engagement framework to solicit input from various stakeholders, including the public. EQB contracted with Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) to assist with implementing the engagement process. The engagement consisted of: • Public comment period • Listening sessions • Public survey • Interviews This memorandum summarizes the feedback received through the public survey. A total of 496 survey responses were submitted. Section 2.0 of this memorandum describes the method used to create the survey and targeted outreach. Section 3.0 of this memorandum provides summaries of responses received to each question. 2.0 Survey Implementation Process and Targeted Engagement Barr used the SurveyMonkey platform for conducting the public engagement survey regarding the DRAFT recommendations. Barr and EQB’s technical team collaborated to develop the questions provided in the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • A Re-Vision of Information Systems Neville Holmes Department Of
    A Re-Vision of Information Systems Neville Holmes Department of Applied Computing & Mathematics University of Tasmania Launceston 7250 Australia Email: [email protected] (published in the Proceedings of the 1996 Australasian Conference on Information Systems) Abstract The theme of the Conference, “Revisioning Information Systems”, is examined. A two decades old vision of information systems is reviewed here by its author to establish the groundwork for a re-vision. The original vision, and its prediction, is evaluated, and used as the basis for a re-vision and a new prediction. Some implications of the new prediction, and some impressions gained while arriving at it, are reviewed. THE CONFERENCE THEME The theme of this the 7th Australian Conference on Information Systems is Revisioning Infor- mation Systems. It must be assumed such curious wording was chosen deliberately to provoke, and it is indeed provocative at several levels. Even the use of the phrase information systems is provocative to anyone who is concerned that agreed and legal standards should be upheld. Ian Gould (1972) in reviewing the work that led to the International Standard Vocabulary (ISO 1991) wrote that “ it is difficult, if not impossible, to find a concept that could reasonably be called ‘information processing’; our machines can surely only process data.” So the very popular view that equates an information system with a computer system is, at the very least, non-standard. Although in one sense this battle for correct terminology is unwinnable, (like the battle to pre- serve impact from synonymy with effect), in another sense it must be kept up at least to influence how people see information systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement Washington State’s Draft Rule on Wetland Mitigation Banks WAC 173-700 Wetland Mitigation Banks November 2002, Revised March 2009 Publication no. 01-06-022 Publication and Contact Information This report is available on the Department of Ecology’s website at www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0106022.html For more information contact: Publications Coordinator Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (360) 407-6096 For more information about mitigation banking in Washington State, contact Kate Thompson in the Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program, Department of Ecology, Olympia, phone (360) 407-6749, e-mail: [email protected] or visit our web page at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/mitigation/banking Recommended Bibliographic Citation: Driscoll, Lauren, K. Thompson, and T. Granger. 2009. Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Washington State's Draft Rule on Wetland Mitigation Banks. Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program, Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA. Washington State Department of Ecology - www.ecy.wa.gov/ o Headquarters, Olympia (360) 407-6000 o Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue (425) 649-7000 o Southwest Regional Office, Olympia (360) 407-6300 o Central Regional Office, Yakima (509) 575-2490 o Eastern Regional Office, Spokane (509) 329-3400 If you need this publication in an alternate format, call Publications Coordinator at (360) 407- 6096. Persons with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341. Cover illustration: Tim Schlender Draft Environmental Impact Statement Washington State’s Draft Rule on Wetland Mitigation Banks WAC 173-700 Wetland Mitigation Banks by Lauren Driscoll, K.
    [Show full text]