Commercial Truck Platooning Demonstration in Texas – Level 2 Automation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TTI: 0-6836 Commercial Truck Platooning Demonstration in Texas – Level 2 Automation Technical Report 0-6836-1 Cooperative Research Program TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration and the Texas Department of Transportation http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6836-1.pdf Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-17/0-6836-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date COMMERCIAL TRUCK PLATOONING DEMONSTRATION IN Published: August 2017 TEXAS – LEVEL 2 AUTOMATION 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Beverly Kuhn, Mike Lukuc, Mohammad Poorsartep, Jason Wagner, Report 0-6836-1 Kevin Balke, Dan Middleton, Praprut Songchitruksa, Nick Wood, and Maarit Moran 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas A&M Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project 0-6836 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report: Research and Technology Implementation Office April 2015–April 2019 125 E. 11th Street 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78701-2483 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Commercial Truck Platooning – Level 2 Automation URL: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6836-1.pdf 16. Abstract Through this project, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) funded the creation of a comprehensive truck platooning demonstration in Texas, serving as a proactive effort in assessing innovative operational strategies to position TxDOT as a leader in this research area and the overall transportation systems management and operation using connected vehicle and automated vehicle initiatives. The focus was on the feasibility of deploying truck platoons with two or more vehicles on specific corridors in Texas within 5 to 10 years. The project brought together major partners, including government agencies, national labs, truck manufacturers and equipment suppliers, all of which have committed resources in terms of in-kind matching of equipment, engineering services, and intellectual property. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Platooning, Automation, Commercial Truck, Fuel No restrictions. This document is available to the Savings, Connected Automation, DSRC, V2V, public through NTIS: Adaptive Cruise Control, Cooperative Adaptive National Technical Information Service Cruise Control, ACC, CACC, Automated Vehicle, Alexandria, Virginia CV, AV, Commercial Freight, Freight Mobility Plan http://www.ntis.gov 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 220 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized COMMERCIAL TRUCK PLATOONING DEMONSTRATION IN TEXAS – LEVEL 2 AUTOMATION by Beverly T. Kuhn Senior Research Engineer Dan Middleton Texas A&M Transportation Institute Research Engineer Texas A&M Transportation Institute Mike Lukuc Research Scientist Praprut Songchitruksa Texas A&M Transportation Institute Associate Research Engineer Texas A&M Transportation Institute Mohammad Poorsartep Research Scientist Nick Wood Texas A&M Transportation Institute Associate Transportation Researcher Texas A&M Transportation Institute Jason Wagner Associate Transportation Researcher and Texas A&M Transportation Institute Maarit Moran Kevin Balke Associate Transportation Researcher Research Engineer Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Report 0-6836-1 Project 0-6836 Project Title: Commercial Truck Platooning – Level 2 Automation Performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration Published: August 2017 TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER This research was performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the FHWA or TxDOT. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. This report is not intended for construction, bidding, or permit purposes. The engineer in charge of the project was Beverly T. Kuhn, P.E., TX #80308. The United States Government and the State of Texas do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was conducted in cooperation with TxDOT and FHWA. The authors thank the TxDOT Project Director, Caroline Mays, their Project Manager, Sonya Badgley, and the other project panel members, Alex Power, Charles Koonce III, Janie Temple, Scott Cunningham, Robert Porter, and Travis Scuggs. The project authors would also like to acknowledge the extended project team, each of whom provide invaluable input, ranging from individuals who contributed to individual tasks to those who advised on the overall project and strategic decisions. This includes: Project Advisors: Ed Seymour Chris Poe Ginger Goodin Extended Project Team: Chiara-Silvestri Dobrovolny Steven Polunsky Geza Pesti Nadeem Chaudhary Sushant Sharma Steven Venglar Chiara-Silvestri Dobrovolny Steven Polunsky Geza Pesti Nadeem Chaudhary Praprut Songchitruksa Sushant Sharma Steven Venglar Managers from Collaborative Projects: Curtis Morgan Robert Brydia The authors also acknowledge the efforts of our primary contractor, Ricardo, responsible for system integration, including: Lee Barnes, Business Unit Director Prasad Challa – Senior Software Engineer vi Nirav Shah – Software Engineer Senthil Radhakrishnan – Senior Engineer Scott Anderson – Chief Engineer And finally, the authors would like to acknowledge our project partner companies. Without their strategic involvement, commitment and in-kind contributions, including engineering subject matter expertise, equipment and funding, this project wouldn’t have been successful. This includes: Navistar Bendix ZF-TRW Denso International Americas Great Dane Trailers Lytx ARGONNE National Labs US Army TARDEC vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... xi List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. xiii Chapter 1: Project Overview ....................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 Reasons for Automation ............................................................................................................. 1 Platooning and the Response to the RFP .................................................................................... 2 Benefits of Truck Automation .................................................................................................... 3 Existing Platooning Efforts ......................................................................................................... 4 Scope and Purpose ...................................................................................................................... 8 Document Overview ................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 2: Setting the Stage ...................................................................................................... 11 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 11 Potentially Relevant Federal Regulations ................................................................................. 11 NHTSA Recommendations on Automated Vehicles ................................................................ 17 Federal Regulations on Connected Vehicles ............................................................................ 19 Potentially Relevant State Legislation and Regulations ........................................................... 20 Liability Issues and Concerns ................................................................................................... 27 Interview Methodology and Process ......................................................................................... 27 Key Concerns ............................................................................................................................ 28 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 31 Chapter 3: Development of Platooning Scenarios ................................................................... 33 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 33 Identify Alternative Concepts ..................................................................................................