DOCSLIB.ORG

The Battle of Singapore, the Massacre of Chinese and Understanding of the Issue in Postwar Japan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Battle of Singapore, the Massacre of Chinese and Understanding of the Issue in Postwar Japan Volume 7 | Issue 28 | Number 4 | Article ID 3187 | Jul 13, 2009 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Battle of Singapore, the Massacre of Chinese and Understanding of the Issue in Postwar Japan Hayashi Hirofumi following the capture of Singapore The Battle of Singapore, the The first point to be considered is why Massacre of Chinese and the massacre took place, and the second Understanding of the Issue in is how the massacre has been presented Postwar Japan in postwar Japan. Although even ex- Kempeitai officers involved have Hayashi Hirofumi admitted that the killings were inhumane and unlawful, little attention has been Shortly after British forces surrendered paid to the episode in Japan. While there in Singapore on 15 February 1942, the has been valuable research carried out Japanese military began operation on the Japanese military administration Kakyou Shukusei [a] or Dai Kenshou [b], of Malaya and Singapore, no detailed known in the Chinese community of Japanese study of the killing has Singapore as the Sook Ching ("Purge") appeared. Moreover, while the Singapore [c], in which many local Chinese were Massacre is well known to scholars, massacred.[1] Although the killings have similar killings in the Malay Peninsula been investigated extensively by scholars only came to the attention of the in Malaysia and Singapore, this article Japanese public in the late 1980s after I draws on Japanese sources to examine discovered documents relating to the the events. Japanese military units involved. Why did the Japanese Military Massacre Chinese in Singapore? On the night of 17 February 1942, Maj. Gen. Kawamura Saburo, an infantry brigade commander, was placed in charge of Japan’s Singapore Garrison. The next morning, he appeared at Army Headquarters and was ordered by 25th Army commander, Lt. Gen. Yamashita Tomoyuki, to carry out mopping-up Chinese inspected by Kempeitai operations. He received further detailed 1 7 | 28 | 4 APJ | JF instructions from the chief of staff, Lt. unsettled. Gen. Suzuki Sosaku, and Lt. Colonel Tsuji Masanobu. Kawamura then consulted The mass screening was carried out with the Kempeitai commander, Lt. Col. mainly by Kempeitai personnel between Oishi Masayuki. The plan to purge the 21 and 23 February in urban areas, and Chinese population was drawn up in the by the Imperial Guard Division at the end course of these meetings. Under this of February in suburban districts. Most scheme, Chinese males between the ages accounts of the killings include a map of 18 and 50 were ordered to report to that shows the island divided into four mass screening centers. Those deemed sections, and explain that the Imperial anti-Japanese were detained, loaded onto Guards, the 5th Division, and the 18th lorries, and taken away to the coast or to Division carried out the mass screening other isolated places where they were in suburban districts.[6] However, on 21 machine-gunned and bayoneted to February, the 25th Army ordered both death.[2] My survey of official the 5th and 18th Divisions to move into documents of the Japanese military the Malay Peninsula to carry out revealed two sources that specified the mopping-up operations.[7] The order number massacred. One is Kawamura’s assigned the Imperial Guard Division to diary that shows the figure as 5,000.[3] conduct a mass screening of non-urban The other is an issue of the Intelligence areas of Singapore, with the 5th and the Record of the 25th Army (No.62, dated 18th Divisions responsible for the rest of 28 May 1942) prepared by the staff the Malay Peninsula. According to war section of the 25th Army.[4] This secret diaries and documents relating to these record states that the number missing as two divisions, neither played a role in the a result of bombing and the purge was mass screening in Singapore. The 1947 11,110. This second record is important British war crimes trial in Singapore[8] because it was drawn up as a secret prosecuted the commander of the document shortly after the purge took Imperial Guard Division, Lt. Gen. place. However, it includes both bombing Nishimura Takuma, on charges related to and purge casualties and offers no basis the Singapore Massacre, but not the for the figure. commanders of the 5th or 18th Divisions. This version of events is correct, and the In Singapore it is generally believed that conventional mapping of the massacre is the number killed in this event was about incorrect. 50,000.[5] However, on the basis of materials available in Japan, Singapore, and the UK, I find no basis for this figure. Although I can not present exact figures, my estimation is that a minimum of 5000 died; I can offer no figure for the maximum. The issue of numbers remains 2 7 | 28 | 4 APJ | JF 1942. Rebuttal of the Defense Let us consider the justification or defense for the actions of the Japanese army presented by some Japanese writers and researchers. One of the major points is that the Chinese volunteer forces, such as the Dalforce, the Singapore Overseas Chinese Anti-Japanese Volunteer Army, fought fiercely and caused heavy Japanese casualties. This is supposed to Kempeitai headquarters: the old have inflamed Japanese anger and led to YMCA Building reprisals against local Chinese.[11] About 600 personnel from among the 1,250- It is important to note that the purge was strong Dalforce volunteers were sent to planned before Japanese troops landed in the front. Some 30 per cent of Dalforce Singapore. The military government personnel either died in action or were section of the 25th Army had already killed during the subsequent Purge.[12] drawn up a plan entitled, It is generally said in Singapore that the "Implementation Guidline for Dalforce personnel fought fiercely.[13] Manipulating Overseas Chinese" on or Whatever their bravery, however, their around 28 December 1941.[9] This role seems exaggerated in Singapore guideline stated that anyone who failed accounts. The volunteers of Dalforce to obey or cooperate with the occupation were equipped only with outdated authorities should be eliminated. It is weapons. Japanese military histories clear that the headquarters of the 25th make no reference to Chinese volunteers Army had decided on a harsh policy during the battle of Singapore, and toward the Chinese population of report that the opposition put up by Singapore and Malaya from the British forces was weaker than expected. beginning of the war. According to Onishi The greatest threat to the Japanese was Satoru,[10] the Kempeitai officer in artillery bombardment.[14] charge of the Jalan Besar screening centre, Kempeitai commander Oishi During the war crimes trial of 1947, no Masayuki was instructed by the chief of Japanese claimed that losses suffered by staff, Suzuki Sosaku, at Keluang, Johor, Japanese forces at the hand of Chinese to prepare for a purge following the volunteers contributed to the massacre. capture of Singapore. Although the exact As noted above, the 25th Army had date of this instruction is not known, the planned the mass purge even before the Army headquarters was stationed in battle of Singapore. This sequence of Keluang from 28 January to 4 February events clearly rebuts the claims. 3 7 | 28 | 4 APJ | JF A second point raised is that the Chinese Otani Keijiro, a Kempeitai lieutenant in Malaya were passing intelligence to colonel in charge of public security in the British and that Chinese guerrillas Singapore from the beginning of March were engaged in subversive activities 1942, also rejected this line of defense, against Japanese forces during the severely criticizing Japanese atrocities in Malayan campaign, for example by Singapore.[18] Onishi stated that he had flashing signals to British airplanes. The not expected hostile Chinese to begin an Kempeitai of the 25th Army was on the anti-Japanese campaign, at least not in alert for such activities during the the short term, since public security in Malayan campaign, but made only two Singapore was improving.[19] arrests. Kempeitai officer Onishi Satoru The fourth argument is that staff officer said in his memoirs that they had been Tsuji Masanobu was the mastermind unable to find any evidence of the use of behind the massacre, and that he flash signals and that it was personally planned and carried it out. technologically impossible. Thus, this line Although Tsuji was a key figure in these of argument is refuted by a military events, I believe that researchers have officer who was directly involved in the overestimated his role. At the time of the events.[15] war crimes trials, Tsuji had not been A third explanation offered for the arrested. As soon as the war ended, he massacre is that anti-Japanese Chinese escaped from Thailand to China, where were preparing for an armed he came under the protection of the insurrection, and that law and order was Kuomintang government, having deteriorating in Singapore. They claim cooperated with them in fighting the that a purge was necessary to restore communists. He later secretly returned to public order, and this point was raised at Japan in May 1948 where he was the war crimes trial in Singapore.[16] protected by the US military, namely G2 One piece of evidence cited by the of GHQ.[20] In this situation, the defense defense during the trial was an entry in counsel of the war crimes trial of 1947 Kawamura’s personal diary for 19 attempted to pin all responsibility on February that purportedly said looting Tsuji, who could not be prosecuted. This still continued in the city. The same point will be discussed in more detail evidence was presented to the Tokyo War below. Crimes Trial.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Japan Between the Wars
    JAPAN BETWEEN THE WARS The Meiji era was not followed by as neat and logical a periodi- zation. The Emperor Meiji (his era name was conflated with his person posthumously) symbolized the changes of his period so perfectly that at his death in July 1912 there was a clear sense that an era had come to an end. His successor, who was assigned the era name Taisho¯ (Great Righteousness), was never well, and demonstrated such embarrassing indications of mental illness that his son Hirohito succeeded him as regent in 1922 and re- mained in that office until his father’s death in 1926, when the era name was changed to Sho¯wa. The 1920s are often referred to as the “Taisho¯ period,” but the Taisho¯ emperor was in nominal charge only until 1922; he was unimportant in life and his death was irrelevant. Far better, then, to consider the quarter century between the Russo-Japanese War and the outbreak of the Manchurian Incident of 1931 as the next era of modern Japanese history. There is overlap at both ends, with Meiji and with the resur- gence of the military, but the years in question mark important developments in every aspect of Japanese life. They are also years of irony and paradox. Japan achieved success in joining the Great Powers and reached imperial status just as the territo- rial grabs that distinguished nineteenth-century imperialism came to an end, and its image changed with dramatic swiftness from that of newly founded empire to stubborn advocate of imperial privilege. Its military and naval might approached world standards just as those standards were about to change, and not long before the disaster of World War I produced revul- sion from armament and substituted enthusiasm for arms limi- tations.
    [Show full text]
  • Australians Into Battle : the Ambush at Gema S
    CHAPTER 1 1 AUSTRALIANS INTO BATTLE : THE AMBUSH AT GEMA S ENERAL Percival had decided before the debacle at Slim River G that the most he could hope to do pending the arrival of further reinforcements at Singapore was to hold Johore. This would involve giving up three rich and well-developed areas—the State of Selangor (includin g Kuala Lumpur, capital of the Federated Malay States), the State of Negr i Sembilan, and the colony of Malacca—but he thought that Kuala Lumpu r could be held until at least the middle of January . He intended that the III Indian Corps should withdraw slowly to a line in Johore stretching from Batu Anam, north-west of Segamat, on the trunk road and railway , to Muar on the west coast, south of Malacca . It should then be respon- sible for the defence of western Johore, leaving the Australians in thei r role as defenders of eastern Johore. General Bennett, however, believing that he might soon be called upo n for assistance on the western front, had instituted on 19th December a series of reconnaissances along the line from Gemas to Muar . By 1st January a plan had formed in his mind to obtain the release of his 22nd Brigade from the Mersing-Jemaluang area and to use it to hold the enem y near Gemas while counter-attacks were made by his 27th Brigade on the Japanese flank and rear in the vicinity of Tampin, on the main road near the border of Malacca and Negri Sembilan . Although he realised tha t further coastal landings were possible, he thought of these in terms of small parties, and considered that the enemy would prefer to press forwar d as he was doing by the trunk road rather than attempt a major movement by coastal roads, despite the fact that the coastal route Malacca-Muar- Batu Pahat offered a short cut to Ayer Hitam, far to his rear .
    [Show full text]
  • Record of the Istanbul Process 16/18 for Combating Intolerance And
    2019 JAPAN SUMMARY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS EVENT SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 PLENARY SESSIONS ................................................................................................................................. 7 LAUNCHING THE 2019 G20 INTERFAITH FORUM.......................................................................... 7 FORMAL FORUM INAUGURATION – WORKING FOR PEACE, PEOPLE, AND PLANET: CHALLENGES TO THE G20 ............................................................................................................... 14 WHY WE CAN HOPE: PEACE, PEOPLE, AND PLANET ................................................................. 14 ACTION AGENDAS: TESTING IDEAS WITH EXPERIENCE FROM FIELD REALITIES ........... 15 IDEAS TO ACTION .............................................................................................................................. 26 TOWARDS 2020 .................................................................................................................................... 35 CLOSING PLENARY ............................................................................................................................ 42 PEACE WORKING SESSIONS ................................................................................................................ 53 FROM VILE TO VIOLENCE: FREEDOM OF RELIGION & BELIEF & PEACEBUILDING ......... 53 THE DIPLOMACY OF RELIGIOUS PEACEBUILDING ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hirohito the Showa Emperor in War and Peace. Ikuhiko Hata.Pdf
    00 Prelims H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:00 Page i HIROHITO: THE SHO¯ WA EMPEROR IN WAR AND PEACE 00 Prelims H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:00 Page ii General MacArthur and Emperor Hirohito photographed in the US Embassy, Tokyo, shortly after the start of the Occupation in September 1945. (See page 187) 00 Prelims H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:00 Page iii Hirohito: The Sho¯wa Emperor in War and Peace Ikuhiko Hata NIHON UNIVERSITY Edited by Marius B. Jansen GLOBAL ORIENTAL 00 Prelims H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:00 Page iv HIROHITO: THE SHO¯ WA EMPEROR IN WAR AND PEACE by Ikuhiko Hata Edited by Marius B. Jansen First published in 2007 by GLOBAL ORIENTAL LTD P.O. Box 219 Folkestone Kent CT20 2WP UK www.globaloriental.co.uk © Ikuhiko Hata, 2007 ISBN 978-1-905246-35-9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the Publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A CIP catalogue entry for this book is available from the British Library Set in Garamond 11 on 12.5 pt by Mark Heslington, Scarborough, North Yorkshire Printed and bound in England by Athenaeum Press, Gateshead, Tyne & Wear 00 Prelims H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:00 Page vi 00 Prelims H:Master Testpages Enigma 6/6/07 15:00 Page v Contents The Author and the Book vii Editor’s Preface
    [Show full text]
  • War Crimes in the Philippines During WWII Cecilia Gaerlan
    War Crimes in the Philippines during WWII Cecilia Gaerlan When one talks about war crimes in the Pacific, the Rape of Nanking instantly comes to mind.Although Japan signed the 1929 Geneva Convention on the Treatment of Prisoners of War, it did not ratify it, partly due to the political turmoil going on in Japan during that time period.1 The massacre of prisoners-of-war and civilians took place all over countries occupied by the Imperial Japanese Army long before the outbreak of WWII using the same methodology of terror and bestiality. The war crimes during WWII in the Philippines described in this paper include those that occurred during the administration of General Masaharu Homma (December 22, 1941, to August 1942) and General Tomoyuki Yamashita (October 8, 1944, to September 3, 1945). Both commanders were executed in the Philippines in 1946. Origins of Methodology After the inauguration of the state of Manchukuo (Manchuria) on March 9, 1932, steps were made to counter the resistance by the Chinese Volunteer Armies that were active in areas around Mukden, Haisheng, and Yingkow.2 After fighting broke in Mukden on August 8, 1932, Imperial Japanese Army Vice Minister of War General Kumiaki Koiso (later convicted as a war criminal) was appointed Chief of Staff of the Kwantung Army (previously Chief of Military Affairs Bureau from January 8, 1930, to February 29, 1932).3 Shortly thereafter, General Koiso issued a directive on the treatment of Chinese troops as well as inhabitants of cities and towns in retaliation for actual or supposed aid rendered to Chinese troops.4 This directive came under the plan for the economic “Co-existence and co-prosperity” of Japan and Manchukuo.5 The two countries would form one economic bloc.
    [Show full text]
  • Berita Volume XXIX, Number 3 (2005)
    Ohio University OHIO Open Library Berita 2005 Berita Volume XXIX, Number 3 (2005) Ronald Provencher Follow this and additional works at: https://ohioopen.library.ohio.edu/berita Part of the Asian Studies Commons Recommended Citation Provencher, Ronald, "Berita Volume XXIX, Number 3 (2005)" (2005). Berita. 14. https://ohioopen.library.ohio.edu/berita/14 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by OHIO Open Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Berita by an authorized administrator of OHIO Open Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. the spontaneity and fun of scholarly discussion on our BERITA – V.29,n.3—3rd Qtr–2005--PAGE own website, interacting with colleagues regarding 1 current events, forthcoming conferences and publi- cations, research and grant opportunities, tried-and- true and new paradigms, etc. We want this because we choose it and we love it. And as scholars we don’t like limiting pages because of the costs of paper copy. Periodicals (Relevant to M/S/B Studies) >Akademika: jurnal sains kemasyarakatan dan kemanusiaan (Journal of the social sciences and humanities) N.62 -- Jan 2003 -- 1) Hafriza Burhanudeen, "Separate opinions and declarations: the language choices of judges" [From the Abstract -- Draws upon Harre and Davie's concept of positioning to ascertain propositions expressed implicitly or explicitly in the language choices of three judges representing the International Court of Justice in the Philippines' request to intervene in the case between Malaysia and Indonesia concerning sovereignty over Pulau Sipandan and Ligitan], pp 3-15; 2) Jamaie Haji Hamil, "Kepimpinan politik: polo kepimpinan politik UMNO" [From the Abstract -- Deals with the dynamism of Malay political leadership in UMNO -- Using the concept of political leadership, the research establishes the dynamic pattern of four UMNO presidents: Tunku, Razak, Hussein and Mahathir], pp ISSN 0273-4311 17-39; 3) Shaiful Bahri Md.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads of Technical Information
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2018 Nuclear Spaces: Simulations of Nuclear Warfare in Film, by the Numbers, and on the Atomic Battlefield Donald J. Kinney Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES NUCLEAR SPACES: SIMULATIONS OF NUCLEAR WARFARE IN FILM, BY THE NUMBERS, AND ON THE ATOMIC BATTLEFIELD By DONALD J KINNEY A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Donald J. Kinney defended this dissertation on October 15, 2018. The members of the supervisory committee were: Ronald E. Doel Professor Directing Dissertation Joseph R. Hellweg University Representative Jonathan A. Grant Committee Member Kristine C. Harper Committee Member Guenter Kurt Piehler Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For Morgan, Nala, Sebastian, Eliza, John, James, and Annette, who all took their turns on watch as I worked. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the members of my committee, Kris Harper, Jonathan Grant, Kurt Piehler, and Joseph Hellweg. I would especially like to thank Ron Doel, without whom none of this would have been possible. It has been a very long road since that afternoon in Powell's City of Books, but Ron made certain that I did not despair. Thank you. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract..............................................................................................................................................................vii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Above the Clouds Page 1
    Above the Clouds Page 1 Above the Clouds Status Culture of the Modern Japanese Nobility Takie Sugiyama Lebra University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London Above the Clouds Page 2 University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 1993 by The Regents of the University of California First Paperback Printing 1995 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lebra, Takie Sugiyama, 1930- Above the clouds : status culture of the modern Japanese nobility / Takie Sugiyama Lebra. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-520-07602-8 1. Japan—Social life and customs—20th century. 2. Nobility— Japan. L Title. DS822.3.L42 1992 306.4’0952—dc20 91-28488 Printed in the United States of America 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences— Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Above the Clouds Page 3 To the memory of William P. Lebra Above the Clouds Page 4 Contents List of Tables List of Illustrations Orthographic Note on Japanese Words Acknowledgments 1. Studying the Aristocracy: Why, What, and How? 2. Creating the Modern Nobility: The Historical Legacy 3. Ancestors: Constructing Inherited Charisma 4. Successors: Immortalizing the Ancestors 5. Life-Style: Markers of Status and Hierarchy 6. Marriage: Realignment of Women and Men 7. Socialization: Acquisition and Transmission of Status Culture 8. Status Careers: Privilege and Liability 9. Conclusion Epilogue: The End of Showa Notes Glossary References Above the Clouds Page 5 Tables 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Asian History
    3 ASIAN HISTORY Porter & Porter and the American Occupation II War World on Reflections Japanese Edgar A. Porter and Ran Ying Porter Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Asian History The aim of the series is to offer a forum for writers of monographs and occasionally anthologies on Asian history. The Asian History series focuses on cultural and historical studies of politics and intellectual ideas and crosscuts the disciplines of history, political science, sociology and cultural studies. Series Editor Hans Hägerdal, Linnaeus University, Sweden Editorial Board Members Roger Greatrex, Lund University Angela Schottenhammer, University of Salzburg Deborah Sutton, Lancaster University David Henley, Leiden University Japanese Reflections on World War II and the American Occupation Edgar A. Porter and Ran Ying Porter Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: 1938 Propaganda poster “Good Friends in Three Countries” celebrating the Anti-Comintern Pact Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 94 6298 259 8 e-isbn 978 90 4853 263 6 doi 10.5117/9789462982598 nur 692 © Edgar A. Porter & Ran Ying Porter / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2017 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Police of Japan
    P OLICE OF JAPAN CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………....... ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE & RESOURCES 1. Responsibilities 1 2. History 2 3. Organizational Structure 2 4. Human Resources 8 5. Budget 11 6. Equipment 12 COMMUNITY SAFETY 1. Community Policing 13 2. Crime Prevention 15 3. Countermeasures against Personal Safety-Threatening Cases 16 4. Sound Growth of Amusement Businesses 16 5. Preventing Deterioration of Public Morals 16 6. Countermeasures against Economic Crimes 17 7. Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency and Sound Development of Youth 18 8. Countermeasures against Cybercrime 21 SUPPORT FOR CRIME VICTIMS 1. Police Support for Victims 24 2. Cooperation with Private Organizations for Victim Support 25 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION 1. Overview 26 2. Fight against Organized Crimes 28 3. Firearms Control 30 4. Drug Control 31 5. Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing 34 6. Fight against Crime Infrastructures 35 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………....... TRAFFIC POLICE 1. Overview 36 2. Enforcement 36 3. ITS Developed by the Japanese Police 38 4. Driver’s License 39 5. Promotion of Traffic Safety Education and Campaigns 39 SECURITY POLICE 1. Overview 40 2. Various Activities 43 3. Crisis Management System after the Great East Japan Earthquake 45 CYBER SECURITY Strategy and Structure to Counter Cyber Threats 46 POLICE SCIENCE & INFO-COMMUNICATIONS 1. Police Info-Communications 48 2. Criminal Identification 51 3. National Research Institute of Police Science 52 INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION 1. Technical Assistance 55 2. International Cooperation in Fighting Transnational Crimes 57 Appendices 1. Number of Juveniles Arrested for Penal Code Offenses (2019) 59 2. Number of Penal Code Offenses Known and Cleared (2015-2019) 60 3. Numbers of Traffic Violations 61 1 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE & RESOURCES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 10.45Am Service at St. Tudy War Memorial Followed by CRYING OUT
    10.45am Service at St. Tudy War Memorial followed by CRYING OUT FOR PEACE RINGING of ONE Bell 75 times, one for each year since VJ Day - 15th August 1945 Robin Thwaites, the new Curate, welcomed Villagers to the Service of Commemoration and reminded all present of the restrictions regarding Covid-19, asking all to remember to socially distance. Colonel Rupert Nicholas OBE then spoke for a few minutes about the experiences of the men who endured so much in the Far East campaign and gave a short account of his father’s service and experiences. This was then followed by the laying of the wreaths on behalf of the Historical Society, the Parish Council, and the Village Hall. Ten Villagers were known to have had a relation who took part in the fighting and the ten each laid a Cross of Remembrance for their father, uncle, aunt, or grandfather. The Exhortation was then read out, all joined in the refrain before the Last Post was sounded prior to the two-minute silence and Reveille. Prayers were then led by the Curate before ‘The Cry for Peace’ after which one single bell was run 75 times to mark the years since the end of WW2. The service concluded with the saying of the National Anthem as singing, at the time of the service, was not permitted. 15th August 1945 marked the end of WW2 after six years of conflict involving many countries from around the world. After the defeat of Nazi Germany in Europe, thousands of troops in East Asia fought on until Japan’s surrender, with many not returning home until 1946.
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction of Singaporean National Identity in the Rhetoric of Lee Kuan Yew from 1965
    Reclaiming Agency The Construction of Singaporean National Identity in the Rhetoric of Lee Kuan Yew from 1965 – 1970 by Bao En Toh Reclaiming Agency The Construction of Singaporean National Identity in the Rhetoric of Lee Kuan Yew from 1965 – 1970 by Bao En Toh A thesis presented for the B. A. degree with Honors in The Department of English University of Michigan Spring 2011 © 21st March 2011, Bao En Toh For Singapore and for Lee Kuan Yew, in appreciation of his lifetime‘s work Acknowledgements I am extremely indebted to Professor David Porter, my thesis advisor, for his invaluable advice and generous encouragement throughout the writing of this thesis. He has unwaveringly supported my work since September 2010, from the very genesis of this project. Professor Porter has been the only person to read every part of this lengthy thesis as it was produced, even going over some sections more than once. In spite of my tardiness in finishing drafts he has always stoically made time to critique my work before our meetings. I am deeply grateful to Professor Porter for always being reassuring, communicative and patient; this thesis would not have been possible without his effort and dedication. Professor Catherine Sanok‘s genius for drawing out insights I never knew I had is matched only by her ability to calm frantic undergraduates—I always emerge from her office feeling inspired and on track. In addition, I cannot thank her enough for keeping me on a brutal but absolutely necessary writing schedule, without which I would still be on my title page.
    [Show full text]