DOCSLIB.ORG

1 H.C.J. 7957/04 Petitioners: 1. Zaharan Yunis Muhammad Mara

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 H.C.J. 7957/04 Petitioners: 1. Zaharan Yunis Muhammad Mara HCJ 7957/04 Mara’abe v. The Prime Minister of Israel 1 H.C.J. 7957/04 Petitioners 1. Zaharan Yunis Muhammad Mara%abe 2. Morad Ahmed Muhammad Ahmed 3. Muhammad Jamil Mas%ud Shuahani 4. Adnan Abd el Rahman Daud ,dah 5. Abd el Rahim Ismail Daud ,dah -. .assem Salah Abd el Rahman ,dah 7. The Association for Civil Ri0hts in Israel v. Respondents 1. The Prime Minister of Israel 2. The Minister of Defense 3. The Commander of ID2 2orces in the Judea and Samaria Area 4. The Separation 2ence Authority 5. The Alfei Menashe 4ocal Council The Supreme Court Sittin0 as the Hi0h Court of Justice 5September 12 20046 March 31 20056 June 21 20057 Before President A. Barak, Vice President M. Cheshin, Justice D. Beinisch, Justice A. Procaccia, Justice E. Levy, Justice A. Grunis, Justice M. Naor, Justice S. Joubran & Justice E. Hayut Petition for an Order Nisi 2or Petitioners Michael Sfard Dan Ya8ir 4imor Yehuda 2or Respondents no. 194 Anar Helman Avi 4icht 2or Respondent 5 .aruch Hei8in JUDGMENT President A. Barak: Alfei Menashe is an Israeli town in the Samaria area. It was established approximately four 8ilometers beyond the Green 4ine. Pursuant the military commander%s orders, a separation fence was built, surroundin0 the town from all sides, and leavin0 a passa0e containin0 a road connectin0 the town to Israel. A number of Palestinian villa0es are included within the fence%s perimeter. The separation fence cuts them off from the HCJ 7957/04 Mara’abe v. The Prime Minister of Israel 2 remainin0 parts of the Judea and Samaria area. An enclave of Palestinian villa0es on the "Israeli" side of the fence has been created. Petitioners are residents of the villa0es. They contend that the separation fence is not le0al. This contention of theirs is based upon the jud0ment in The Beit Sourik Case (HCJ 205-/04 Beit Sourik Village Council v. The Government of Israel, 5A(5) P.D. A07). The petition also relies upon the Advisory Cpinion of the International Court of Justice at the Ha0ue (Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion (International Court of Justice, July 9, 2004), 43 I4 M 1009 (2004)). Is the separation fence le0alD That is the Euestion before us. A. The Background and the Petition 1. Terrorism and the Response to It 1. In September 2000 the second intifada bro8e out. A mi0hty attac8 of acts of terrorism landed upon Israel, and upon Israelis in the Judea, Samaria, and GaFa Strip areas (hereinafter G the area). Most of the terrorist attac8s were directed toward civilians. They struc8 at men and at women6 at elderly and at infant. Entire families lost their loved ones. The attac8s were desi0ned to ta8e human life. They were desi0ned to sow fear and panic. They were meant to obstruct the daily life of the citiFens of Israel. Terrorism has turned into a strate0ic threat. Terrorist attac8s are committed inside of Israel and in the area. They occur everywhere, includin0 public transportation, shoppin0 centers and mar8ets, coffee houses, and inside of houses and communities. The main tar0ets of the attac8s are the downtown areas of Israel%s cities. Attac8s are also directed at the Israeli communities in the area, and at transportation routes. Terrorist or0aniFations use a variety of means. These include suicide attac8s ("0uided human bombs"), car bombs, explosive char0es, throwin0 of Molotov coc8tails and hand 0renades, shootin0 attac8s, mortar fire, and roc8et fire. A number of attempts at attac8in0 strate0ic tar0ets ("me0a9terrorism") have failed. Thus, for example, the intent to topple one of the AFrieli towers in Tel Aviv usin0 a car bomb in the par8in0 lot was frustrated (April 2002). Another attempt which failed was the attempt to detonate a truc8 in the 0as tan8 farm at Pi Glilot (May 2003). Since the onset of these terrorist acts, up until mid July 2005, almost one thousand attac8s have been carried out within Israel. In Judea and Samaria, 9000 attac8s have been carried out. Thousands of attac8s have been carried out in the GaFa Strip. More than one thousand Israelis have lost their lives, approximately 200 of them in the Judea and Samaria area. Many of the injured have become severely handicapped. Cn the Palestinian side as well, the armed conflict has caused many deaths and injuries. Ie are flooded with bereavement and pain. 2. Israel too8 a series of steps to defend the lives of her residents. Military operations were carried out a0ainst terrorist or0aniFations. These operations were intended to defeat the Palestinian terrorist infrastructure and prevent reoccurrence of terrorist acts (see HCJ 3239/02 Marab v. The Commander of IDF Forces in the Judea and Samaria Area, 57(2) P.D. 349, hereinafter – Marab6 HCJ 327A/02 The Center for Defense of the Individual v. The Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank Area, 57(1) P.D. 3A5. These steps did not provide a sufficient answer to the immediate need to halt the severe terrorist attac8s. Innocent people continued to pay with life and limb. I discussed this in The Beit Sourik Case HCJ 7957/04 Mara’abe v. The Prime Minister of Israel 3 "These terrorist acts committed by the Palestinian side have led Israel to ta8e security steps of various levels of severity. Thus, the 0overnment, for example, decided upon various military operations, such as operation JDefensive IallK (March 2002) and operation JDetermined PathK (June 2002). The objective of these military actions was to defeat the Palestinian terrorist infrastructure and to prevent reoccurrence of terror attac8s . These combat operations G which are not re0ular police operations, rather bear all the characteristics of armed conflict G did not provide a sufficient answer to the immediate need to stop the severe acts of terrorism. The Committee of Ministers on National Security considered a series of steps intended to prevent additional acts of terrorism and to deter potential terrorists from committin0 such acts . Despite all these measures, the terror did not come to an end. The attac8s did not cease. Innocent people paid with both life and limb. This is the bac80round behind the decision to construct the separation fence (Id., at p. A15). A0ainst this bac80round, the idea of erectin0 a separation fence in the Judea and Samaria area, which would ma8e it difficult for terrorists to stri8e at Israelis and ease the security forces% stru00le a0ainst the terrorists, was formulated. 3. The construction of the separation fence was approved by the 0overnment on June 23 2002. At the same time, phase A of the fence was approved. Its len0th is 11- 8m. It be0ins in the area of the Salem villa0e, adjacent to the Me0iddo junction, and continues to the Trans9Samaria Hi0hway adjacent to the El8ana community. An additional obstacle in the Jerusalem area (approximately 22 8m lon0) was also approved. These were intended to prevent terrorist infiltration into the north and center of the country, and into the Jerusalem area. The 0overnment decision stated, inter alia, "(3) In the framewor8 of phase A G to approve construction of security fences and obstacles in the %seamline area% and in the surroundin0s of Jerusalem, in order to decrease infiltrations by terrorists from the Judea and Samaria areas for the purpose of attac8s in Israel. (4) The fence, li8e the other obstacles, is a security means. Its construction does not reflect a political border, or any other border. (5) . (-) The exact and final route of the fence shall be determined by the Prime Minister and the Minister of Defense . the final route shall be presented to the Committee of Ministers on National Security or to the 0overnment." HCJ 7957/04 Mara’abe v. The Prime Minister of Israel 4 After that (December 2002) the construction of phase . of the fence was approved. That phase be0an at Salem villa0e, headin0 east until the Jordan river (approximately -0 8m). This phase also includes an offshoot startin0 at Mt. Avner (adjacent to the villa0e of Al Mutilla) in the southern Gilboa, headin0 south toward Thaisar villa0e. After about one year (on Cctober 1 2003) the 0overnment decided to construct phases C and D of the fence. Phase C includes the fence between El8ana and the Camp Cfer military base, a fence east of the .en Gurion airport and north of planned hi0hway 45, and a fence protectin0 Israeli communities in Samaria (includin0 Ariel, Emanuel, Medumim, Marnei Shomron). Phase D includes the area from the EtFion .loc southward to the southern Hebron area. The 0overnment decision stated, inter alia "(2) The obstacle built pursuant to this decision, li8e its other se0ments in the %seamline area%, is a security means for preventin0 terrorist attac8s, and does not reflect a political border, or any other border. (3) 4ocal alterations of the obstacle route or of construction necessary for the overall plannin0 of the route, shall be brou0ht for approval to the Minister of Defense and the Prime Minister. (4) . (5) . (-) Durin0 the detailed plannin0, all efforts shall be made to minimiFe, to the extent possible, disturbance liable to be caused to the daily lives of Palestinians as a result of the construction of the obstacle." The separation fence discussed in the petition before us is part of phase A of fence construction. The separation fence discussed in The Beit Sourik Case is part of phase C of fence construction. The len0th of the entire fence, includin0 all four phases, is approximately 7-3 8m. Accordin0 to information relayed to us, approximately 242 8m of fence have already been erected, and are in operational use.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • At the Supreme Court Sitting As the High Court of Justice
    Disclaimer: The following is a non-binding translation of the original Hebrew document. It is provided by HaMoked: Center for the Defence of the Individual for information purposes only. The original Hebrew prevails in any case of discrepancy. While every effort has been made to ensure its accuracy, HaMoked is not liable for the proper and complete translation nor does it accept any liability for the use of, reliance on, or for any errors or misunderstandings that may derive from the English translation. For queries about the translation please contact [email protected] At the Supreme Court HCJ 5839/15 Sitting as the High Court of Justice HCJ 5844/15 1. _________ Sidr 2. _________ Tamimi 3. _________ Al Atrash 4. _________ Tamimi 5. _________ A-Qanibi 6. _________ Taha 7. _________ Al Atrash 8. _________ Taha 9. HaMoked: Center for the Defence of the Individual, founded by Dr. Lotte Salzberger - RA Represented by counsel, Adv. Andre Rosenthal 15 Salah a-Din St., Jerusalem Tel: 6250458, Fax: 6221148; cellular: 050-5910847 The Petitioners in HCJ 5839/15 1. Anonymous 2. Anonymous 3. Anonymous 4. HaMoked: Center for the Defence of the Individual, founded by Dr. Lotte Salzberger – RA Represented by counsel, Adv. Michal Pomeranz et al. 10 Huberman St. Tel Aviv-Jaffa 6407509 Tel: 03-5619666; Fax: 03-6868594 The Petitioners in HCJ 5844/15 v. Military Commander of the West Bank Area Represented by the State Attorney's Office Ministry of Justice, Jerusalem Tel: 02-6466008; Fax: 02-6467011 The Respondent in HCJ 5839/15 1. Military Commander of the West Bank Area 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf, 366.38 Kb
    FF II CC SS SS Field Information and Coordination Support Section Division of Operational Services Israel Sources: UNHCR, Global Insight digital mapping © 1998 Europa Technologies Ltd. As of December 2009 Israel_Atlas_A3PC.WOR Dahr al Ahmar Jarba The designations employed and the presentation of material on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the 'Aramtah Ma'adamiet Shih Harran al 'Awamid Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, Qatana Haouch Blass 'Artuz territory, city or area of its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its Najha frontiers or boundaries LEBANON Al Kiswah Che'baâ Douaïr Al Khiyam Metulla Sa`sa` ((( Kafr Dunin Misgav 'Am Jubbata al Khashab ((( Qiryat Shemons Chakra Khan ar Rinbah Ghabaqhib Rshaf Timarus Bent Jbail((( Al Qunaytirah Djébab Nahariyya El Harra ((( Dalton An Namir SYRIAN ARAB Jacem Hatzor GOLANGOLAN Abu-Senan GOLANGOLAN Ar Rama Acre ((( Boutaiha REPUBLIC Bi'nah Sahrin Tamra Shahba Tasil Ash Shaykh Miskin ((( Kefar Hittim Bet Haifa ((( ((( ((( Qiryat Motzkin ((( ((( Ibta' Lavi Ash Shajarah Dâail Kafr Kanna As Suwayda Ramah Kafar Kama Husifa Ath Tha'lah((( ((( ((( Masada Al Yadudah Oumm Oualad ((( ((( Saïda 'Afula ((( ((( Dar'a Al Harisah ((( El 'Azziya Irbid ((( Al Qrayyah Pardes Hanna Besan Salkhad ((( ((( ((( Ya'bad ((( Janin Hadera ((( Dibbin Gharbiya El-Ne'aime Tisiyah Imtan Hogla Al Manshiyah ((( ((( Kefar Monash El Aânata Netanya ((( WESTWEST BANKBANK WESTWEST BANKBANKTubas 'Anjara Khirbat ash Shawahid Al Qar'a'
    [Show full text]
  • Israel-Hizbullah Conflict: Victims of Rocket Attacks and IDF Casualties July-Aug 2006
    My MFA MFA Terrorism Terror from Lebanon Israel-Hizbullah conflict: Victims of rocket attacks and IDF casualties July-Aug 2006 Search Israel-Hizbullah conflict: Victims of rocket E-mail to a friend attacks and IDF casualties Print the article 12 Jul 2006 Add to my bookmarks July-August 2006 Since July 12, 43 Israeli civilians and 118 IDF soldiers have See also MFA newsletter been killed. Hizbullah attacks northern Israel and Israel's response About the Ministry (Note: The figure for civilians includes four who died of heart attacks during rocket attacks.) MFA events Foreign Relations Facts About Israel July 12, 2006 Government - Killed in IDF patrol jeeps: Jerusalem-Capital Sgt.-Maj.(res.) Eyal Benin, 22, of Beersheba Treaties Sgt.-Maj.(res.) Shani Turgeman, 24, of Beit Shean History of Israel Sgt.-Maj. Wassim Nazal, 26, of Yanuah Peace Process - Tank crew hit by mine in Lebanon: Terrorism St.-Sgt. Alexei Kushnirski, 21, of Nes Ziona Anti-Semitism/Holocaust St.-Sgt. Yaniv Bar-on, 20, of Maccabim Israel beyond politics Sgt. Gadi Mosayev, 20, of Akko Sgt. Shlomi Yirmiyahu, 20, of Rishon Lezion Int'l development MFA Publications - Killed trying to retrieve tank crew: Our Bookmarks Sgt. Nimrod Cohen, 19, of Mitzpe Shalem News Archive MFA Library Eyal Benin Shani Turgeman Wassim Nazal Nimrod Cohen Alexei Kushnirski Yaniv Bar-on Gadi Mosayev Shlomi Yirmiyahu July 13, 2006 Two Israelis were killed by Katyusha rockets fired by Hizbullah: Monica Seidman (Lehrer), 40, of Nahariya was killed in her home; Nitzo Rubin, 33, of Safed, was killed while on his way to visit his children.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrested Development: the Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Barrier in the West Bank
    B’TSELEM - The Israeli Information Center for ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT Human Rights in the Occupied Territories 8 Hata’asiya St., Talpiot P.O. Box 53132 Jerusalem 91531 The Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Tel. (972) 2-6735599 | Fax (972) 2-6749111 Barrier in the West Bank www.btselem.org | [email protected] October 2012 Arrested Development: The Long Term Impact of Israel's Separation Barrier in the West Bank October 2012 Research and writing Eyal Hareuveni Editing Yael Stein Data coordination 'Abd al-Karim Sa'adi, Iyad Hadad, Atef Abu a-Rub, Salma a-Deb’i, ‘Amer ‘Aruri & Kareem Jubran Translation Deb Reich Processing geographical data Shai Efrati Cover Abandoned buildings near the barrier in the town of Bir Nabala, 24 September 2012. Photo Anne Paq, activestills.org B’Tselem would like to thank Jann Böddeling for his help in gathering material and analyzing the economic impact of the Separation Barrier; Nir Shalev and Alon Cohen- Lifshitz from Bimkom; Stefan Ziegler and Nicole Harari from UNRWA; and B’Tselem Reports Committee member Prof. Oren Yiftachel. ISBN 978-965-7613-00-9 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Part I The Barrier – A Temporary Security Measure? ................. 7 Part II Data ....................................................................... 13 Maps and Photographs ............................................................... 17 Part III The “Seam Zone” and the Permit Regime ..................... 25 Part IV Case Studies ............................................................ 43 Part V Violations of Palestinians’ Human Rights due to the Separation Barrier ..................................................... 63 Conclusions................................................................................ 69 Appendix A List of settlements, unauthorized outposts and industrial parks on the “Israeli” side of the Separation Barrier .................. 71 Appendix B Response from Israel's Ministry of Justice .......................
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories
    REPORT ON ISRAELI SETTLEMENT IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES A Bimonthly Publication of the Foundation for Middle East Peace Volume 20 Number 4 July-August 2010 MOVING BEYOND A SETTLEMENT FREEZE — THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION LOOKS FOR A NEW COURSE By Geoffrey Aronson the settlement of Amona, for example, The wave of building in Judea the state prosecutor’s office offered an In their meeting on July 6, President and Samaria has never been explanation for its inaction that was Barack Obama and Israeli prime minis- higher. Thousands of units are described by Ha’aretz correspondent ter Benjamin Netanyahu presented a being built in every location. I Akiva Eldar as “the line that will go well-choreographed bit of political the- was never a fan of the freeze. No down in the ‘chutzpah’ record books: atre aimed at highlighting the “excel- one in the cabinet was. [The The prosecution asks to reject the lent” personal and political relations be- freeze] was a mistake. It is impos- demand to evacuate the illegal settle- tween the two leaders and the countries sible to take people and freeze ment since diverting the limited means they represent. Obama explained after them. This is not a solution. The of enforcement to old illegal construc- their meeting that, “As Prime Minister government remains committed tion ‘is not high on the respondents’ Netanyahu indicated in his speech, the to renew a wave of construction agenda.’ And why not? ‘Means of bond between the United States and this coming September. In any enforcement’ are needed to implement Israel is unbreakable.
    [Show full text]
  • RIPE for ABUSE RIGHTS Palestinian Child Labor in Israeli Agricultural Settlements WATCH in the West Bank
    HUMAN RIPE FOR ABUSE RIGHTS Palestinian Child Labor in Israeli Agricultural Settlements WATCH in the West Bank Ripe for Abuse Palestinian Child Labor in Israeli Agricultural Settlements in the West Bank Copyright © 2015 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-32392 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org APRIL 2015 978-1-6231-32392 Ripe for Abuse Palestinian Child Labor in Israeli Agricultural Settlements in the West Bank Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 International Law Violations .....................................................................................................4 Expanding Settlement Agriculture, Restrictive Anti-Palestinian Policies ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • ISRAEL.Qxp Mise En Page 1 11/07/2019 14:40 Page1 Middle East & West Asia ISRAEL UNITARY COUNTRY
    Fiche ISRAEL.qxp_Mise en page 1 11/07/2019 14:40 Page1 Middle East & West Asia ISRAEL UNITARY COUNTRY BASIC SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS INCOME GROUP: HIGH INCOME LOCAL CURRENCY: NEW ISRAELI SHEKEL (ILS) POPULATION AND GEOGRAPHY ECONOMIC DATA Area: 21 643 km 2 GDP: 333.4 billion (current PPP international dollars), i.e. 38 276 dollars per inhabitant Population: 8.709 million inhabitants (2017), an increase of 1.7% (2017) per year (2010-2015) Real GDP growth: 3.3% (2017 vs 2016) Density: 402 inhabitants / km 2 Unemployment rate: 4.2% (2017) Urban population: 92.3% of national population Foreign direct investment, net inflows (FDI): 18 169 (BoP, current USD millions, 2017) Urban population growth: 2.0% (2017) Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF): 20.3% of GDP (2016) Capital city: Jerusalem (10.4% of national population) HDI: 0.903 (very high), rank 22 (2017) MAIN FEATURES OF THE MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK Israel is a unitary parliamentary democracy established in 1948 by the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel. Israel has no formal written constitution but thirteen “Basic Laws” (and a temporary one) that were passed in 1957 to set up a legal framework. The first basic law established the parliament in 1958. It is a unicameral parliament ( Knesset ) composed of 120 members elected every four years by direct universal suffrage. The Knesset elects the President of the State in a secret vote for a single, seven-year term. The country’s prime minister is the head of government and chief executive, entrusted with the task of forming the cabinet, which is the government’s main policy-making and executive body.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Growing Pains at 60
    Viewpoints Special Edition Israel: Growing Pains at 60 The Middle East Institute Washington, DC Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints are another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US rela- tions with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org The maps on pages 96-103 are copyright The Foundation for Middle East Peace. Our thanks to the Foundation for graciously allowing the inclusion of the maps in this publication. Cover photo in the top row, middle is © Tom Spender/IRIN, as is the photo in the bottom row, extreme left.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 March 2004 ICG Asia Report N°77 Islamabad/Brussels
    DEVOLUTION IN PAKISTAN: REFORM OR REGRESSION? 22 March 2004 ICG Asia Report N°77 Islamabad/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 3 A. GENERAL AYUB KHAN'S BASIC DEMOCRACY.......................................................................3 B. GENERAL ZIA-UL-HAQ'S LOCAL GOVERNMENT SYSTEM ......................................................4 III. THE MUSHARRAF DEVOLUTION........................................................................... 5 A. DOMESTIC AND EXTERNAL IMPERATIVES .............................................................................5 B. THE BLUEPRINT ....................................................................................................................7 1. Administrative Decentralisation ................................................................................7 2. Fiscal Decentralisation...............................................................................................8 3. Law Enforcement.......................................................................................................8 C. MILITARY EXCEPTIONS.........................................................................................................8 D. DOMESTIC REACTION ...........................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and the Occupied Territories 2015 Human Rights Report
    ISRAEL 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Israel is a multiparty parliamentary democracy. Although it has no constitution, the parliament, the unicameral 120-member Knesset, has enacted a series of “Basic Laws” that enumerate fundamental rights. Certain fundamental laws, orders, and regulations legally depend on the existence of a “state of emergency,” which has been in effect since 1948. Under the Basic Laws, the Knesset has the power to dissolve the government and mandate elections. The nationwide Knesset elections in March, considered free and fair, resulted in a coalition government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security services. (An annex to this report covers human rights in the occupied territories. This report deals with human rights in Israel and the Israeli- occupied Golan Heights.) During the year according to Israeli Security Agency (ISA, also known as Shabak) statistics, Palestinians committed 47 terror attacks (including stabbings, assaults, shootings, projectile and rocket attacks, and attacks by improvised explosive devices (IED) within the Green Line that led to the deaths of five Israelis and one Eritrean, and two stabbing terror attacks committed by Jewish Israelis within the Green Line and not including Jerusalem. According to the ISA, Hamas, Hezbollah, and other militant groups fired 22 rockets into Israel and in 11 other incidents either planted IEDs or carried out shooting or projectile attacks into Israel and the Golan Heights. Further
    [Show full text]
  • West Nile Virus (WNV) Activity in Humans and Mosquitos
    West Nile virus (WNV) activity in humans and mosquitos Updated for 28/11/2016 In the following report, a human case patient who is defined as "suspected" refers to a patient whose lab test results indicate a possibility of infection with WNV, and a human case patient who is defined as "confirmed" refers to a patient whose lab test results show a definite infection with WNV. The final definition status of a patient who initially was diagnosed as "suspected" may be changed to "confirmed" due to additional lab test results that were obtained over time. Cumulative numbers of human case patients and mosquitos positive for WNV by location: Until the 28/11/2016, human cases with WNF have been identified in 54 localities and WNV infected mosquitos were found in 6 localities. אגף לאפידמיולוגיה Division of Epidemiology משרד הבריאות Ministry of Health ת.ד.1176 ירושלים P.O.B 1176 Jerusalem [email protected] [email protected] טל: 02-5080522 פקס: Tel: 972-2-5080522 Fax: 972-2-5655950 02-5655950 Table showing WNV in human by place of residency: Date sample Diagnostic status Locality No. Locality Health district received in lab according to lab 1 Or Yehuda 31/05/2016 Suspected Tel Aviv Or Yehuda 02/06/2016 Suspected Tel Aviv 2 Or Aqiva 17/07/2016 Suspected Hadera 3 Ashdod 19/09/2016 Suspected Ashqelon Ashdod 27/09/2016 Confirmed Ashqelon 4 Ashqelon 29/08/2016 Suspected Ashqelon Ashqelon 05/09/2016 Confirmed Ashqelon Ashqelon 08/09/2016 Confirmed Ashqelon Ashqelon 13/09/2016 Confirmed Ashqelon Ashqelon 22/09/2016 Confirmed Ashqelon
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]