DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on Pre-Existing in Situ and Ancillary Datasets for Sites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on Pre-Existing in Situ and Ancillary Datasets for Sites Project Title: BIO_SOS Biodiversity Multisource Monitoring System: from Space TO Species Contract No: FP7-SPA-2010-1-263435 Instrument: Thematic Priority: Start of project: 1 December 2010 Duration: 36 months Deliverable No: D4.1 Report on pre-existing in situ and ancillary datasets for sites Due date of 31 July 2011 deliverable: Actual submission V1 date: Version: 1st version of D4.1 Main Authors: João Pradinho Honrado, Joaquim Alonso, Carlos Guerra, Isabel Pôças, João Gonçalves, Bruno Marcos Project ref. number 263435 BIO_SOS: Biodiversity Multisource Monitoring System: Project title from Space to Species Deliverable title Report on pre-existing in situ and ancillary datasets for sites Deliverable number D4.1 Deliverable version Version 1 Previous version(s) - Contractual date of 31 July 2011 delivery Actual date of delivery 2 August 2011 Deliverable filename BIO_SOS_D41_Pre-existing_Data_vf.doc Nature of deliverable R Dissemination level PU = Public Number of pages 129 Workpackage WP4 Partner responsible Partner 9 (CIBIO/ICETA) Author(s) João Pradinho Honrado (P9), Joaquim Alonso (P9), Carlos Guerra (P9), Isabel Pôças (P9), João Gonçalves (P9), Bruno Marcos (P9), Richard Lucas (P11) Editor João Pradinho Honrado EC Project Officer Florence Beroud Abstract This report provides a synthesis of work carried out in the first six months of Task 4.1. Specifically, it provides a conceptual, legal and institutional reference framework for dataset description and quality evaluation, results from a first inventory and preliminary internal quality evaluation of pre-existing datasets across BIO_SOS sites, a methodological framework for external quality evaluation, and a first set of proposals and guidelines for data acquisition and for data quality management throughout the project. Keywords Data quality evaluation, Data quality management, Datasets inventory, Metadata, Pre-existing datasets D4.1 Report on pre-existing in situ and ancillary datasets for test sites Signatures Written by Responsibility- Company Date Signature João Pradinho Honrado Responsible of WP4, CIBIO Verified by Panayotis Dimopoulos Task 4.4 Leader, UOI Approved by Quality Assurance Plan Fifame Koudogbo Group, ALTAMIRA Palma Blonda Project Coordinator, CNR BIO_SOS FP7-SPACE-2010-1 GA 263435Page 4 of 130 D4.1 Report on pre-existing in situ and ancillary datasets for test sites Table of Contents 1. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 7 2. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Scope of the report ................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 D4.1 within the scope of Task 4.1. and of WP4 ...................................................................... 9 2.3 D4.1 within the broader scope of BIO_SOS (and beyond) .................................................... 10 3. Spatial data quality evaluation and management ............................................................................ 12 3.1 Initiatives, framework, legal and technical standards and references.................................... 12 3.2 Metadata and spatial data quality analysis and management ............................................... 15 3.2.1 Metadata and the management of spatial data ................................................................ 15 3.2.2 A definition of spatial data quality ..................................................................................... 15 3.2.3 Standards for metadata and (spatial) data quality ............................................................ 17 3.2.4 Methods and indicators for spatial data evaluation ........................................................... 19 3.3 Data quality, interoperability and (meta)data sharing ............................................................ 21 3.4 Data quality in BIO_SOS and the general workflow of Task 4.1 ........................................... 22 4. Internal quality evaluation of pre-existing data ................................................................................ 24 4.1 Methodological framework and workflow .............................................................................. 24 4.1.1 Collection of metadata on pre-existing datasets ............................................................... 24 4.1.1.1 Dataset typifying and identification .............................................................................. 24 4.1.1.2 Metadata profile description ........................................................................................ 24 4.1.1.3 Data collection procedure ............................................................................................ 26 4.1.2 Internal quality evaluation ................................................................................................ 26 4.2 Internal quality of pre-existing datasets ................................................................................ 28 4.2.1 Quality of global and regional datasets ............................................................................ 28 4.2.2 Quality of test-site datasets .............................................................................................. 30 4.2.2.1 Brazil sites ................................................................................................................... 30 4.2.2.2 Greece sites ................................................................................................................ 32 4.2.2.3 Italy sites ..................................................................................................................... 34 4.2.2.4 Netherlands sites ........................................................................................................ 36 4.2.2.5 Portugal sites .............................................................................................................. 38 4.2.2.6 United Kingdom sites .................................................................................................. 41 4.2.3 Comparative synthesis ..................................................................................................... 43 4.2.3.1 Comments on the ensemble of collected databases.................................................... 43 4.2.3.2 Results across Annexes of INSPIRE ........................................................................... 45 4.2.3.3 Final overarching remarks ........................................................................................... 47 5. A framework for external quality evaluation ..................................................................................... 49 BIO_SOS FP7-SPACE-2010-1 GA 263435Page 5 of 130 D4.1 Report on pre-existing in situ and ancillary datasets for test sites 5.1 Context and concepts ........................................................................................................... 49 5.2 A proposed framework for external quality evaluation of pre-existing datasets ..................... 50 5.2.1 General features of the framework ................................................................................... 50 5.2.2 Protocol for assessing external quality of datasets in BIO_SOS ...................................... 51 5.2.3 Application examples ....................................................................................................... 56 5.3 Perspectives for implementation ........................................................................................... 59 6. Synthesis, proposals and guidelines ............................................................................................... 60 6.1 Quality of pre-existing datasets: a first diagnosis .................................................................. 60 6.1.1 Considerations on the methodology ................................................................................. 60 6.1.2 Quality and relevance of pre-existing datasets ................................................................. 61 6.2 Quality-related guidelines for new dataset acquisition in BIO_SOS ...................................... 62 6.2.1 Guidelines for a general strategy ..................................................................................... 62 6.2.2 Quality evaluation across the data life cycle ..................................................................... 62 6.2.2.1 Before spatial data collection or capture ...................................................................... 63 6.2.2.2 During spatial data collection or capture and metadata development .......................... 63 6.2.2.3 After data collection or capture and spatial database management ............................. 64 6.3 Guidelines for data quality management in BIO_SOS .......................................................... 65 7. Appendices ..................................................................................................................................... 67 8. References ................................................................................................................................... 124 9. Abbreviations and acronyms ......................................................................................................... 129 BIO_SOS FP7-SPACE-2010-1 GA 263435Page 6 of 130 D4.1 Report on pre-existing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Llywodraeth Cymru / Welsh Government A487 New Dyfi Bridge Environmental Statement - Volume 3: Appendix 9.1
    Llywodraeth Cymru / Welsh Government A487 New Dyfi Bridge Environmental Statement - Volume 3: Appendix 9.1 Desk Study and Extended Phase 1 Report Final Issue | September 2017 Llywodraeth Cymru/Welsh Government A487 New Dyfi Bridge Desk Study and Extended Phase 1 Report Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Scope of this Report 1 2 Methodology 2 2.1 Desk Study 2 2.2 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey 2 2.3 Hedgerow Assessments 3 2.4 Limitations 6 3 Baseline Conditions 7 3.1 Desk Study 7 3.2 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey 15 3.3 Hedgerow Assessments 19 3.4 Potential for Protected Species 20 4 Conclusion 24 References Figures Figure 1 Site Location Plan Figure 2 Statutory Designated Sites Figure 3 Non-Statutory Designated Sites Figure 4 Phase 1 Habitat Plan (01) Figure 5 Phase 1 Habitat Plan (02) Figure 6 Hedgerow Assessment Appendices Appendix A Legislative Context Appendix B Extended Phase 1 Target Notes 900237-ARP-ZZ-ZZ-RP-YE-00030 | P01.1 | 15 July 2016 C:\PROJECTWISE\ARUP UK\PETE.WELLS\D0100636\900237-ARP-ZZ-ZZ-RP-YE-00030.DOCX Llywodraeth Cymru/Welsh Government A487 New Dyfi Bridge Desk Study and Extended Phase 1 Report Appendix C Hedgerows Assessed for Importance 900237-ARP-ZZ-ZZ-RP-YE-00030 | P01.1 | 15 July 2016 C:\PROJECTWISE\ARUP UK\PETE.WELLS\D0100636\900237-ARP-ZZ-ZZ-RP-YE-00030.DOCX Llywodraeth Cymru/Welsh Government A487 New Dyfi Bridge Desk Study and Extended Phase 1 Report 1 Introduction 1.1 Background Ove Arup and Partners Ltd was commissioned by Alun Griffiths (Contractors) Ltd to undertake ecological surveys to inform an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the proposed A487 New Dyfi Bridge scheme (The Scheme) on land to the north of Machynlleth, Mid-Wales, located at National Grid Reference SH747017.
    [Show full text]
  • COBWEB PROJECT Final Publishable Summary Report
    COBWEB PROJECT Final publishable summary report Grant Agreement number: 308513 Project acronym: COBWEB Project title: Citizen Observatory Web Funding Scheme: FP7 CP Period covered: from 01/11/2012 to 19/4/2017 Name of the scientific representative of the project's coordinator and organisation: Chris Higgins (University of Edinburgh) Tel: +44 (0) 7595 11 69 91 E-mail: [email protected] Project website address: www.cobwebproject.eu This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement No 308513 Table of Contents 1. Executive summary ....................................................................................... 3 2. Summary description of project context and objectives ........................... 4 2.1 Project context ................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Project objectives ............................................................................................. 6 3. Description of main S&T results .................................................................. 7 3.1 System design through stakeholder engagement and co-design ..................... 7 3.1.1 Co-Design ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 COBWEB Workflow ....................................................................................... 10 3.3 Architecture ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dyfi and Leri Catchment Management Plan Consultation Report
    NPA-VN a I*i .t o DYFI AND LERI CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT DINAS MAWODWY f t i lUNBRYNMAIt NRA r flwomim National Rivers Authority Welsh Region iO£A vOtWS 5 P DYFI AND LERI CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT DECEMBER 1995 National Rivers Authority Welsh Region (Notional Aw^ority i ■ tw ■ v ■ ..-Tice ENVIRONMENTnm AGENCY 091998 Further copies can be obtained from : The Catchment Planning Coordinator The Area Catchment Planner National Rivers Authority National Rivers Authority Welsh Region, Plot 10, Rivers House, or Parc Menai, St Mellons Business Park, Vaynol Business Park, St Mellons, Bangor, Cardiff. Gwynedd. CF3 OTL LL574BP Telephone Enquiries : Cardiff (01222) 770088 Bangor (01248) 670770 NRA Copyright Waiver. This report is intended to be used widely and may be quoted, copied or reproduced in any way, provided that the extracts are not quoted out of context and due acknowledgement is given to the National Rivers Authority. Acknowledgement:- Maps are based on the 1992 Ordnance Survey 1:50,000 scale map with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office © Copyright. WE 12 95 0.5k E AMOX Awarded lor nccilcncr THE NRA’S VISION FOR THE DYFI AND LERI CATCHMENTS The picturesque catchments of the Dyfi and Leri, at the southern extremity of the Snowdonia National Park are sparsely populated and have experienced less impacts due to man's activities than many other river systems. The area drained by these rivers is of exceptional conservation value, particularly around the internationally important estuary, which has a Site of Special Scientific Interest designated as one of only three Biosphere Reserves in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Dyfi Opportunities
    Opportunities for sustainably managing the Dyfi’s natural resources…to benefit people, the economy and the environment Vol.1 - September 2016 1 Contents Purpose and status of this document Vol 1. 1 Introduction and background 1.1 What is the issue 1.2 What area does the Opportunities Document cover 1.2.1 The legislation 1.3 Why has the Opportunities Document been produced 1.4 How has the Opportunities Document been produced 2 Benefits 2.1 How our natural resources support the economy 2.1.1 Agriculture 2.1.2 Forestry 2.1.3 Outdoor activities 2.1.4 Renewable energy 2.1.5 Mineral resources 2.2 How our natural resources protect us 2.3 How our natural resources support recreation, culture, wildlife and health 3 Challenges & Issues 2 Vol 1 Maps Map No Topic 1 Location of the Dyfi Catchment 2 Productivity of Agricultural land 3 Areas of ‘productive’ woodland 4 Number and variety of businesses related to fishing around the estuary 5 Geology of the Dyfi 6 Areas of land that help prevent flooding 7 The extensive range of habitats in the estuary 8 The contribution of land to preventing sedimentation and erosion 9 The carbon stock contained within soils and vegetation combined 10 Extensive Rights of Way network 10a Scheduled Ancient Monument sites 10b Landscape areas 11 SSSI and Special Area of Conservation sites (SAC) in the Dyfi 12 Communities most at risk of flooding 13 Areas that are storing and emitting carbon 14 Areas generating phosphorous 15 Condition of rivers in the Dyfi 3 Vol 1 Appendices Appendix 1 Existing Plans and strategies related to the natural resources of the area Appendix 2 Important ‘ecosystem services’ in Dyfi Appendix 3 Land Use Capability (LUCI) model Vol 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognising and Reporting Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures
    Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures World Commission on Protected Areas Task Force on OECMs Protected Area Technical Report Series No 3 Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures World Commission on Protected Areas Task Force on OECMs The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or other participating organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating organisations. All examples are provided according to their condition and status as of the date of publication. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2019 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs, (2019). Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. ISBN: 978-2-8317-2025-8 (PDF) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PATRS.3.en Cover photos: Top-left: 6. A pygmy elephant walks along the banks of the river within a community-governed area, near the village of Abai, within the Lower Kinabatangan-Segama Wetlands Ramsar Site, Sabah (Malaysia).
    [Show full text]
  • A Scoping Study
    Establishing a Biosphere Reserve in Wester Ross: A Scoping Study Calum Macleod and Martin F. Price April 2012 Contents Key findings 2 1. Introduction 3 The research in context 3 Aims and objectives 3 Research methods 4 Structure of the report 5 2. Origins and evolution of the Biosphere Reserve concept 5 3. Current and proposed Biosphere Reserves in the UK 8 North Devon’s Biosphere Reserve 8 Biosffer Dyfi Biosphere 9 Proposed Galloway and South Ayrshire Biosphere 10 4. Assessment against UNESCO criteria 11 5. Primary research: Findings and analysis 12 Awareness of the Biosphere Reserve concept in Wester Ross 12 Extent of support for an extended Biosphere Reserve 13 Regional identity in Wester Ross 15 Existing organisational structures and networks 16 ‘Community capitals’ and collaborative partnership working 17 Mobilising support and securing resources 19 6. Conclusions and suggested actions 21 Suggested actions 22 References 23 Appendix 1: List of interviewees 23 Appendix 2: Map of Ward 6, Wester Ross, Strathpeffer and Lochalsh 24 1 Key findings • Awareness in Wester Ross that UNESCO has given Beinn Eighe National Nature Reserve the status of Biosphere Reserve (BR) and of the BR concept more generally is very limited. • Interviewees appear generally supportive of pursuing an application for a new-style BR in principle. However, some interviewees question whether the BR model is the best approach to achieve conservation and broader sustainable development objectives in the region. • There appears to be relatively little evidence of a cohesive sense of regional identity within Wester Ross, for a variety of geographical, political and cultural reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Solutions- Protected Areas Helping People Cope with Climate
    THE ARGUMENTS FOR PROTECTION SERIES IUCN-WCPA (International Union This book clearly articulates for Conservation of Nature’s World “ Commission on Protected Areas) for the first time how Rue Mauverney 28 SOLUTIONS NATURAL Gland 1196 protected areas contribute Switzerland significantly to reducing www.iucn.org /wcpa impacts of climate change and what is needed for them to achieve even more. As we The Nature Conservancy 4245 North Fairfax Drive enter an unprecedented scale Suite 100 of negotiations about climate Arlington VA 22203-1606 and biodiversity it is important USA Protected areas helping people cope with climate change areas Protected that these messages reach www.nature.org policy makers loud and clear and are translated Environment and Energy Group into effective policies and Bureau for Development Policy United Nations Development Programme funding mechanisms. 304 East 45th Street, 9th Floor ” New York Lord Nicholas Stern NY 10017 USA www.undp.org Wildlife Conservation Society 2300 Southern Boulevard Bronx New York NY 10460 USA www.wcs.org Environment Department The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington DC 20433 USA www.worldbank.org/biodiversity Arguments For Protection Arguments WWF International Avenue du Mont-Blanc Gland 1196 Switzerland www.panda.org Preface by Lord Nicholas Stern 1 Arguments for Protection In 2000 a conference organised in Bangkok by WWF and The published reports are: the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas agreed • Running Pure: The importance of forest protected that there was an urgent need to identify and quantify the areas to drinking water wide range of social and environmental benefits offered • Food Stores: Using protected areas to secure crop by protected areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 27Th Session of the International Coordinating Council Of
    27th Session of the International Coordinating Council of the Man and the Biosphere Programme UNESCO, Paris, France, 8-12 June 2015 Report of the National Committee for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland This report is structured according to the Targets of the Madrid Action Plan. National Committee Target 7: Functional National MAB Committees The National MAB Committee meets biannually and includes representatives from: • government departments and agencies in England (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland Environment Agency), Scotland (Scottish Government) and Wales (Welsh Government); • Biosphere Reserve (BRs); • Academic institutions (University of Aberystwyth, University of the Highlands and Islands); • National fora: IUCN National Committee UK, UK MAB Urban Forum. Representatives from planned BRs also attend, as do colleagues from Dublin City Council (Republic of Ireland) who have submitted a proposal for an expanded BR for approval during this ICC (and will host the June 2015 meeting). The Committee’s activities are implemented according to a Strategy and Action Plan, which are regularly reviewed. Biosphere Reserves (BRs) There are currently five BRs in the UK: Beinn Eighe, Brighton & Lewes Downs Biosphere (BLDB), Biosffer Dyfi Biosphere, Galloway and Southern Ayrshire Biosphere (GSAB), and North Devon Biosphere. A nomination form for Beinn Eighe BR to become part of a much larger Wester Ross Biosphere will be submitted to MAB by September 2015, together with another nomination form for the entire Isle of Man and its territorial waters to become Biosphere Vannin. Target 6: Communication strategies for BRs BLDB continues to develop its brand identity in association with the UNESCO MAB brand, and has a working communication strategy and annual communications work plan of events and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Paper Gwasanaeth Ymchwil Yr Aelodau: Papur Ymchwil
    1. Error! No table of contents entries found.1 Environmental Protection Areas in Wales Abstract This paper provides background briefing on the location of environmentally protected areas in Wales and the implications of each designation for land management practices and public access. The paper explores the legislative origins and current definitions of International, European, National and Local environmental designations and relates these to the Welsh context. Upcoming developments in each designation are also reported and the paper briefly outlines the procedures for designation of new sites. September 2006 1 Members’ Research Service / Gwasanaeth Ymchwil yr Aelodau Members’ Research Service: Research Paper Gwasanaeth Ymchwil yr Aelodau: Papur Ymchwil Environmental Protection Areas in Wales Kelly Watson September 2006 Paper number: 06/1194/kw © Crown copyright 2006 Enquiry no: 06/1194/kw Date: 20 September 2006 This document has been prepared by the Members’ Research Service to provide Assembly Members and their staff with information and for no other purpose. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information is accurate, however, we cannot be held responsible for any inaccuracies found later in the original source material, provided that the original source is not the Members’ Research Service itself. This document does not constitute an expression of opinion by the National Assembly, the Welsh Assembly Government or any other of the Assembly’s constituent parts or connected bodies. Members’ Research Service: Research Paper Gwasanaeth Ymchwil yr Aelodau: Papur Ymchwil Executive Summary This paper examines the location and extent of environmental protection areas in Wales, and outlines the eligibility criteria and the procedure for designation of new sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Report for Wildlife Trust BCN & Fens Biosphere Working Group ROUTE
    ROUTE MAP towards developing a Biosphere for the Fens Report for Wildlife Trust BCN & Fens Biosphere Working Group Report from Cambridgeshire ACRE – July 2018 Company limited by guarantee No. 3690881 • Registered charity No. 1074032 • Registered office: 72 Market Street, Ely, CB7 4LS • VAT Registration No. 838 5035 17 ROUTE MAP towards developing a Biosphere for the Fens Report for Wildlife Trust BCN & Fens Biosphere Working Group - Key output of: ‘Cambridgeshire Fens Biosphere Scoping Exercise – Researcher Consultancy Services’, Cambridgeshire ACRE on behalf of Wildlife Trust BCN - Part of and feeding into: Heritage Lottery funded project RH-16-07016, ‘Developing the concept of Biosphere Reserve status for the Cambridgeshire Fens’ Report Status: FINAL Last updated: V3.0: 23/07/2018; V3.2: 17/09/2018 Main author: Mark Nokkert, Cambridgeshire ACRE We are indebted to the Heritage Lottery Fund and all the players of the National Lottery for making this project possible. 2 Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cors Fochno and Dyfi
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 7, 2nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Designation date Site Reference Number Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE1 1JY UK Telephone/Fax: +44 (0)1733 – 562 626 / +44 (0)1733 – 555 948 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: Designated: 05 January 1976 3. Country: UK (Wales) 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Cors Fochno and Dyfi 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Science and COBWEB for Learning 4Th World Congress of Biosphere Reserves
    Citizen science and COBWEB for learning 4th World Congress of Biosphere Reserves Lima, 16th March, 2016 Andy Rowland [email protected] • Citizen science offers a route to learning and engagement • Doing it digitally has additional advantages • The COBWEB project • Case study – Biosffer Dyfi Biosphere, Wales Citizen science - learning sustainable development A tool for increasing engagement and commitment Observing detail in the environment Understanding and appreciation Care and involvement Attitudes and values Can citizen sourced environmental data be useful for decision making? Data quality? Why do citizen science digitally? • GPS enabled, internet connected mobile devices are now ubiquitous • They are more engaging than paper for some • They are a barrier to others, but sometimes the activity gets them over that barrier • The results can be seen on a map at home • It saves the step of digitising manual data • Data can be compared to other digital data • GPS provides the exact location Citizen OBservatory WEB • Research Project: Funded under the European Commission’s Framework Programme 7 • Started November 2012 for 4 years Generic crowdsourcing infrastructure platform Surveys can be created quickly and flexibly Will be open source at end of project, so it can be developed or branded for a BR Open standards – exporting data is easier, whether to QGIS, GBIF or specialised software Citizen OBservatory WEB Data supports policy and management COBWEB is addressing data quality issues 3 pilot case study areas: 1.Validating earth
    [Show full text]