DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Huddersfield Repository

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Huddersfield Repository University of Huddersfield Repository Stone, Graham Developing a Sustainable Publishing Model for a University Press: A Case Study of the University of Huddersfield, 2011-2015 Original Citation Stone, Graham (2017) Developing a Sustainable Publishing Model for a University Press: A Case Study of the University of Huddersfield, 2011-2015. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/33791/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ DEVELOPING A SUSTAINABLE PUBLISHING MODEL FOR A UNIVERSITY PRESS: A CASE STUDY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD, 2011-2015 GRAHAM STONE A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Enterprise The University of Huddersfield May 2017 Table of Contents FIGURES AND TABLES ................................................................................................................. 14 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ............................................................................................................ 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................. 17 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .............................................................................................. 18 ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. 21 CHAPTER 1. SETTING THE SCENE ................................................................................................. 22 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 22 1.1 UNIVERSITY PRESSES AND THE DIGITAL LANDSCAPE ........................................................................... 23 1.2 MOTIVATION FOR THE STUDY ........................................................................................................ 25 1.3 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY ........................................................................................................ 26 1.3.1 The Open Access Movement and the changing landscape of UK funder policy .............. 26 1.3.2 Research strategy and open access at the University of Huddersfield ........................... 28 1.3.3 The University of Huddersfield Press ............................................................................... 29 1.3.4 The University of Huddersfield repository ....................................................................... 30 1.4 FOCUS OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................... 30 1.4.1 Research questions and aims .......................................................................................... 31 1.4.2 Purpose and scope........................................................................................................... 32 1.5 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................... 32 1.5.1 Research Philosophy ........................................................................................................ 33 1.6 SUMMARY AND STRUCTURE OF THESIS ............................................................................................ 37 1.6.1 Chapter 2. Understanding today’s publishing environment ........................................... 38 1.6.2 Chapter 3. University of Huddersfield Press Monographs .............................................. 38 1.6.3 Chapter 4. University of Huddersfield Press Journals ...................................................... 38 1.6.4 Chapter 5. Fields, the University of Huddersfield’s student research journal ................. 39 1.6.5 Chapter 6. Huddersfield Contemporary Records (HCR) ................................................... 39 1.6.6 Chapter 7. Discussion and analysis ................................................................................. 39 2 1.6.7 Substantive appendices ................................................................................................... 39 1.7 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................. 41 CHAPTER 2. UNDERSTANDING TODAY’S PUBLISHING ENVIRONMENT .......................................... 42 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 42 2.1 SETTING THE SCENE: UNIVERSITY PRESSES ........................................................................................ 42 2.1.1 The rise of the Open Access Movement .......................................................................... 44 2.1.2 The role of repositories as ‘publishers’ ............................................................................ 46 2.2 LIBRARY AS PUBLISHER ................................................................................................................. 48 2.2.1 Publishing services ........................................................................................................... 50 2.2.2 Publishing across different disciplines ............................................................................. 51 2.2.3 Developing a library publishing network ......................................................................... 51 2.2.4 Growth of library publishers in Australia ........................................................................ 52 2.3 LIBRARY AS JOURNAL PUBLISHER .................................................................................................... 53 2.3.1 Hosting ............................................................................................................................ 54 2.3.2 Librarian expertise ........................................................................................................... 55 2.3.3 Publishing ........................................................................................................................ 57 2.4 LIBRARY AS SCHOLARLY MONOGRAPH PUBLISHER ............................................................................. 59 2.4.1 The ‘monograph crisis’ .................................................................................................... 59 2.4.2 What are the benefits of publishing open access monographs? .................................... 61 2.4.3 Transition from print to electronic (open access) formats .............................................. 61 2.5 DISSEMINATION AND DISCOVERY ................................................................................................... 63 2.6 BUSINESS MODELS....................................................................................................................... 65 2.6.1 Journal models ................................................................................................................ 65 2.6.2 Monograph business models........................................................................................... 66 2.6.3 Sustainability ................................................................................................................... 67 2.7 CHANGES TO AUTHOR ATTITUDES................................................................................................... 68 2.8 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................. 69 CHAPTER 3 UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD PRESS MONOGRAPHS .............................................. 70 3 3.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 70 3.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 70 3.1.1 What do we mean by a ‘monograph’? ............................................................................ 70 3.2 OPEN ACCESS BUSINESS MODELS FOR MONOGRAPHS ........................................................................ 71 3.2.1 The costs of open access monographs ............................................................................ 74 3.3 UNIVERSITY PRESS MONOGRAPH PUBLICATIONS .............................................................................. 76 3.3.1 Publisher pays.................................................................................................................. 76 3.3.2 Author/Institute/Funder pays ........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pace Final 26.11.15
    Positions, Methodologies and Aesthetics in the Published Discourse about Brian Ferneyhough: A Critical Study Ian Pace1 Since Brian Ferneyhough achieved a degree of public recognition following the premiere of his Transit (1972-75) in March 1975 at the Royan Festival, a range of writings on and reviews of his work have appeared on a relatively regular basis. The nature, scope, style, and associated methodologies of these have expanded or changed quite considerably over the course of Ferneyhough's career––in part in line with changes in the music and its realization in performance––but nonetheless one can discern common features and wider boundaries. In this article, I will present a critical analysis of the large body of scholarly or extended journalistic reception of Ferneyhough's work, identifying key thematic concerns in such writing, and contextualizing it within wider discourses concerning new music. Several key methodological issues will be considered, in particular relating to intentionality and sketch study, from which I will draw a variety of conclusions that apply not only to Ferneyhough, but to wider contemporary musical study as well. Early Writings on Ferneyhough The first extended piece of writing about Ferneyhough's work was an early 1973 article by Elke Schaaf2 (who would become Ferneyhough's second wife),3 which deals with Epicycle (1968), Missa Brevis (1969), Cassandra's Dream Song (1970), Sieben Sterne (1970), Firecyle Beta (1969-71), and the then not-yet-complete Transit. Schaaf’s piece already exhibits one of the most
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 02 20 Programme Booklet FIN
    COMPOSITION - EXPERIMENT - TRADITION: An experimental tradition. A compositional experiment. A traditional composition. An experimental composition. A traditional experiment. A compositional tradition. Orpheus Research Centre in Music [ORCiM] 22-23 February 2012, Orpheus Institute, Ghent Belgium The fourth International ORCiM Seminar organised at the Orpheus Institute offers an opportunity for an international group of contributors to explore specific aspects of ORCiM's research focus: Artistic Experimentation in Music. The theme of the conference is: Composition – Experiment – Tradition. This two-day international seminar aims at exploring the complex role of experimentation in the context of compositional practice and the artistic possibilities that its different approaches yield for practitioners and audiences. How these practices inform, or are informed by, historical, cultural, material and geographical contexts will be a recurring theme of this seminar. The seminar is particularly directed at composers and music practitioners working in areas of research linked to artistic experimentation. Organising Committee ORCiM Seminar 2012: William Brooks (U.K.), Kathleen Coessens (Belgium), Stefan Östersjö (Sweden), Juan Parra (Chile/Belgium) Orpheus Research Centre in Music [ORCiM] The Orpheus Research Centre in Music is based at the Orpheus Institute in Ghent, Belgium. ORCiM's mission is to produce and promote the highest quality research into music, and in particular into the processes of music- making and our understanding of them. ORCiM
    [Show full text]
  • City Research Online
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Bell, Jonathan (2016). Audio-scores, a resource for composition and computer- aided performance. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Guildhall School of Music and Drama) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/17285/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Audio-Scores: A Resource for Composition and Computer-Aided Performance Jonathan Bell Final submission DMus February 2016 ii Abstract This submission investigates computer-aided performances in which musicians receive auditory information via earphones. The interaction between audio-scores (musical material sent through earpieces to performers) and visual input (musical notation) changes the traditional relationship between composer, conductor, performer and listener. Audio-scores intend to complement and transform the printed score. They enhance the accuracy of execution of difficult rhythmic or pitch relationships, increase the specificity of instructions given to the performer (for example, in the domain of timbre), and may elicit original and spontaneous responses from the performer in real-time.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Approaches to Real-Time Notation
    RECENT APPROACHES TO REAL-TIME NOTATION Seth Shafer, B.M., M.M. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2017 APPROVED: Andrew May, Major Professor David Stout, Minor Professor Jon C. Nelson, Committee MemBer Joseph Klein, Chair of the Division of Composition Benjamin Brand, Director of Graduate Studies in the College of Music John W. Richmond, Dean of the College of Music Victor PryButoK, Vice Provost of the Toulouse Graduate School Shafer, Seth. Recent Approaches to Real-Time Notation. Doctor of Philosophy (Music), May 2017, 19ϭ pp., 3 tables, 47 figures, bibliography, 148 titles. This paper discusses several compositions that use the computer screen to present music notation to performers. Three of these compositions, Law of Fives (2015), Polytera II (2016), and Terraformation (2016–17), employ strategies that allow the notation to change during the performance of the worK as the product of composer-regulated algorithmic generation and performer interaction. New methodologies, implemented using Cycling74’s Max software, facilitate performance of these worKs By allowing effective control of generation and on-screen display of notation; these include an application called VizScore, which delivers notation and conducts through it in real-time, and a development environment for real-time notation using the Bach extensions and graphical overlays around them. These tools support a concept of cartographic composition, in which a composer maps a range of potential Behaviors that are mediated by human or algorithmic systems or some combination of the two. Notational variation in performance relies on computer algorithms that can Both generate novel ideas and be subject to formal plans designed by the composer.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Huddersfield Repository
    University of Huddersfield Repository Magas, Diego Sebastian Castro body, mimesis and image : a gesture based approach to interpretation in contemporary guitar performing practice Original Citation Magas, Diego Sebastian Castro (2016) body, mimesis and image : a gesture based approach to interpretation in contemporary guitar performing practice. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/30238/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ BODY, MIMESIS AND IMAGE: A GESTURE-BASED APPROACH TO INTERPRETATION IN CONTEMPORARY GUITAR PERFORMING PRACTICE DIEGO SEBASTIÁN CASTRO MAGAS A thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Huddersfield August 2016 1 Copyright statement i. The author of this thesis (including any appendices and/or schedules to this thesis) owns any copyright in it (the “Copyright”) and s/he has given The University of Huddersfield the right to use such copyright for any administrative, promotional, educational and/or teaching purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • EVAN JOHNSON Forms of Complaint
    EVAN JOHNSON Forms of Complaint Peter Neville Graeme Jennings ELISION Mieko Kanno EXAUDI . James Weeks Mabel Kwan 1999 20 YEARS 2019 © Eugenie Brinkema EVAN JOHNSON (*1980) 1 hyphen (2002) 01:51 Apostrophe 1 (All communication is a form of complaint) (2007 – 2008) 2 I. 19:59 3 II. 03:25 4 clutch (2005) 01:32 5 Colophons (“That other that ich not whenne”) reflecting pool / monument (2006) 08:11 6 Positioning in Radiography (2007) 13:14 TT 48:16 1 Peter Neville, crotales 2 – 3 ELISION: Carl Rosman, bass clarinet Richard Haynes, bass clarinet 4 Graeme Jennings, violin 5 Mieko Kanno, violin EXAUDI: Juliet Fraser, soprano Amanda Morrison, soprano Christopher Field, countertenor Tom Williams, countertenor Stephen Jeffes, tenor Jonathan Bungard, tenor James Weeks, conductor 6 Mabel Kwan, toy pianos 3 is intended to appear as if overheard, ente) follow short bursts of notes that rather than directly listened to. Large are played on the crotales with ei- amounts of compositional and per- ther hammers, knuckles or fingernails. formance energy are directed at out- While the pauses in clutch are stat- comes that barely take place in pub- ic (although unstable because of the lic at all. 1 extreme dynamic level and slow bow speed), those in hyphen take on a The two earliest pieces on this re- character of their own as the reverber- cording, clutch for violin and hyphen ations of the crotales bloom and de- for crotales, were both premiered by cay at different rates, filling the pauses the New York Miniaturist Ensemble, a with subtly changing harmonic environ - group who between 2004 and 2010 ments.
    [Show full text]