DOCSLIB.ORG

Ballen Quartz and Cristobalite in Impact Breccias: Types, Occurrence, and Possible Origin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ballen Quartz and Cristobalite in Impact Breccias: Types, Occurrence, and Possible Origin Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution IV (2008) 3011.pdf BALLEN QUARTZ AND CRISTOBALITE IN IMPACT BRECCIAS: TYPES, OCCURRENCE, AND POSSIBLE ORIGIN. L. Ferrière1, C. Koeberl1, W. U. Reimold2, E. Libowitzky3, and A. Greshake2, 1Department of Lithospheric Research, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria (ludo- [email protected]; [email protected]). 2Museum of Natural History (Mineralogy), Humboldt- University, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany ([email protected]; ansgar.greshake@ museum.hu-berlin.de). 3Institute of Mineralogy and Crystallography, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A- 1090 Vienna, Austria ([email protected]). Introduction and Summary: So-called “ballen the formation at high temperature of ballen of β- quartz” was first described in 1890, in impact melt cristobalite and/or β-quartz, and finally back- rock from the Mien impact structure [1]. “Ballen transformation to α-cristobalite and/or α-quartz; and quartz” has since been reported from about one in (b) a solid-liquid transition from quartz to lechatelierite seven of the known terrestrial impact structures [2]. followed by nucleation and crystal growth at high The first detailed study of these features was reported temperature. by [3], who concluded that the ballen texture repre- sented pseudomorphs after cristobalite that had re- placed lechatelierite initially formed by shock-induced thermal transformation of quartz. Then Bischoff and Stoeffler [4] found that ballen represent recrystallized diaplectic quartz glass that had undergone the transi- tion to cristobalite and then to α-quartz. Three types of “ballen quartz” were recognized by [4], based on opti- cal characteristics: ballen with optically homogeneous extinction, ballen with different crystallographic orien- tations, and ballen with intraballen-recrystallization. Recently, optical and electron microscopic observa- tions, as well as Raman spectroscopy (Fig. 1) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) investiga- tions, have indicated that five types of ballen silica can be distinguished [2]: α-cristobalite ballen with homo- geneous extinction (type I); α-quartz ballen with ho- mogeneous extinction (type II), with heterogeneous extinction (type III), and with intraballen recrystalliza- tion (type IV); and chert-like recrystallized ballen α- quartz (type V). In addition, ballen with a “toasted appearance”, similar to what has been described for shocked quartz grains (e.g., [5]), were reported from Popigai [6], from Wanapitei [7], and from Dhala [8] craters. Ballen, with either α-quartz or α-cristobalite struc- ture, occur as independent clasts or enclosed in diaplectic quartz glass or lechatelierite inclusions (Fig. 2), mostly in impact melt rock and, more rarely, in Figure 1. MicroRaman spectra of different silica phases suevite [2]. Ballen are more or less spheroidal in shape characteristic or associated with ballen silica. a) Minute in- tra-ballen inclusion; b) α-cristobalite ballen (type I); c) α- or in some cases elongate (ovoid), and range in size from about 10 to 220 µm [2]. Furthermore, for the first quartz (ballen of types II-V); d) Aggregate of coesite for reference (sample LB-44B from the Bosumtwi crater). time, coesite was identified by [2] in the form of tiny inclusions exclusively within ballen cristobalite (type According to [2], the different types of ballen silica are I) from the Bosumtwi crater (Fig. 1). interpreted to be the result of retrogression/back- Regarding the formation of ballen, we have re- transformation of β-cristobalite and/or β-quartz to α- cently [2] suggested that two genetic processes are cristobalite and/or to α-quartz with time. Furthermore, possible: (a) an impact-triggered solid-solid transition because ballen silica has been so far only observed in from α-quartz to diaplectic quartz glass, followed by Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution IV (2008) 3011.pdf impactites, these features have been added to the list of cristobalite associated within the same inclusions are impact-diagnostic criteria [2]. not “toasted”; Fig. 2). “Toasted” ballen quartz was New Observations and Discussion: In addition to also observed for the first time in impactites from the the 28 impact structures listed by [2] in which ballen Rochechouart, Sääksjärvi, and Ternovka craters. How- silica have been described, we have recently observed ever, based on our Raman spectroscopy investigations, ballen in impact melt rock from the Logoisk (ballen of these “toasted” ballen show only the typical α-quartz types I, II, and III) and Puchezh-Katunki (ballen of signature. Consequently, the origin for this “toasting” types III, IV, and V) craters. is still somewhat mysterious (further analyses are on- going). In addition, we were able to investigate ballen of α- cristobalite and α-quartz structure occurring within the same silica inclusion using TEM. As already recog- nized by [2], α-cristobalite ballen are composed of numerous tiny individual crystals with sizes up to ~2 µm. And we show that, similarly, α-quartz ballen are composed of numerous tiny crystals of α-quartz. Conclusions: Our observations of: a) α- cristobalite ballen occurring together with α-quartz ballen in the same inclusion, b) similar micro-texture under the TEM for α-cristobalite and α-quartz ballen, and c) the occurrence of α-cristobalite ballen only in the “youngest” impact structures, confirm that α-quartz ballen are the result of back-transformation of β-quartz and/or α-cristobalite with time, as suggested by [2-4]. We should also consider that if α-cristobalite ballen were rapidly quenched, the conversion of α-cristobalite to α-quartz would have been inhibited. Furthermore, α- cristobalite ballen from Bosumtwi, with coesite occur- ring as tiny intraballen inclusions, is so far unique, as we were not able to detect coesite in α-cristobalite ballen from any other impact structure. It is likely that with time, coesite inclusions in materials from much older structures could have been transformed back to α-quartz; note the Bosumtwi structure is, at 1.07 Ma age, by far the youngest impact structure investigated by us. Figure 2. Microphotographs of: a) α-quartz ballen (type II) Acknowledgments: This work is supported by the in impact melt rock from Wanapitei crater; b) “Toasted” Austrian Science Foundation (FWF), grant P18862- ballen α-quartz (type II) associated with α-cristobalite ballen N10, the Austrian Academy of Sciences, and a grant (type I) in the same lechatelierite inclusion in impact melt by SYNTHESYS. Dieter Stöffler is gratefully ac- rock from the Popigai crater. knowledged for allowing investigation of thin sections from his impactite collection. Thanks to Roald Tagle Furthermore, we were able to characterize the different for providing thin sections from Popigai. types of ballen silica that occur at Dellen (types I-IV), References: [1] Holst N. O. (1890) Sveriges El'gygytgyn (type I), Jänisjärvi (types III and IV), Geologiska Undersökning. Serie C, No 110. Stockholm. [2] Sääksjärvi (types II-V), Ternovka (types III and IV), Ferrière L. et al. (2008) (in revision). [3] Carstens H. (1975) and Wanapitei (types I-V) craters. Surprisingly, no Contrib. Mineral. and Petrol., 50, 145-155. [4] Bischoff A. coesite inclusions were observed within α-cristobalite and Stöffler D. (1984) J. Geophys. Res., 89, B645-B656. [5] ballen from these structures. However, interestingly, Short N. M. and Gold D. P. (1996) Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. cristobalite ballen (type I) were observed together with Paper 302, 245-265. [6] Whitehead J. et al. (2002) Meteorit- ballen quartz (types II and III), associated in the same ics & Planet. Sci., 37, 623-647. [7] Dressler B. O. et al. inclusions, in impact melt rocks from Wanapitei and (1997) Meteoritics & Planet. Sci., 32, 249-258. [8] Pati J. K. from Popigai crater. Additionally, some of the ballen et al. (2008) Meteoritics & Planet. Sci. (in press). quartz from Popigai has “toasted” appearance (ballen .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crystalline Silica, Cristobalite (CAS No
    Crystalline Silica, Quartz (CAS No. 14808-60-7) Crystalline Silica, Cristobalite (CAS No. 14464-46-1) Crystalline Silica, Tridymite (CAS No. 15468-32-3) Diatomaceous earth (CAS No. 61790-53-2) This dossier on crystalline silica, quartz, cristobalite and tridymite and diatomaceous earth presents the most critical studies pertinent to the risk assessment of these substances in their use in drilling muds and cement additives. This dossier does not represent an exhaustive or critical review of all available data. The majority of information presented in this dossier was obtained from the ECHA database that provides information on chemicals that have been registered under the EU REACH (ECHA). Where possible, study quality was evaluated using the Klimisch scoring system (Klimisch et al., 1997). For the purpose of this dossier, crystalline silica, quartz (CAS No. 14808-60-7) has been reviewed as representative of crystalline silica cristobalite and tridymite. Crystalline silica, quartz is also considered representative of diatomaceous earth, as they both consist mainly of silicon dioxide. Screening Assessment Conclusion – Crystalline silica, quartz, cristobalite and tridymite and diatomaceous earth are classified as tier 1 chemicals and require a hazard assessment only. 1 BACKGROUND Crystalline silica is a common mineral found in the earth's crust. Materials like sand, stone, concrete and mortar contain crystalline silica. It is also used to make products such as glass, pottery, ceramics, bricks and artificial stone. Silica, in the form of sand, is used as the main ingredient in sand casting for the manufacture of metallic components in engineering and other applications. The high melting point of silica enables it to be used in such applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure Characterization of Impact Natural Diamond from Popigai Crater
    80th Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society 2017 (LPI Contrib. No. 1987) 6191.pdf STRUCTURE CHARACTERIZATION OF IMPACT NATURAL DIAMOND FROM POPIGAI CRATER Mara Murri1, Adrian P. Jones2, Paul F. McMillan3, Christoph G. Salzmann3, Matteo Alvaro1, M. Chiara Domeneghetti1, Fabrizio Nestola4, Mauro Prencipe5, David Dobson2, Rachael Hazael3, Moreton Moore6, Sergei A. Vishnevsky7, Alla M. Logvinova7, Nikolay V. Sobolev7 1 Earth and Environmental Science University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 1, Italy ([email protected]), 2 Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK ([email protected]), 3 Department of Chemistry, University College London, WC1E 6BT, UK, 4 Department of Geosciences, University of Padua, Italy 5 Earth Sciences Department, University of Torino, Italy, 6 Royal Holloway, University of London, TW20 0EX, UK, 7 Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Koptyug Ave., 3, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia Introduction: Impact cratering is undoubtedly one of the most frequent high-energetic and potentially catastrophic event occurring at the earth surface and in the planetary system. For example, the energy released from an impact occurring on the Earth’s surface as calculated even for a small impact crater appears to be 3 orders of magnitudes higher than the Hiroshima atomic bomb. These enormous energies and the very short duration can cause unique irreversible changes to rocks and minerals (eg. deformations, phase transformations, melting and vaporization) and are compatible with P and T conditions required to transform graphite into diamond (4.5GPa at 1000°C) and are also enough to induce deformation in the newly formed diamonds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Popigai Crater in the Capacity of Interplanetary Structural Analog
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 5, EPSC2010-217, 2010 European Planetary Science Congress 2010 c Author(s) 2010 The Popigai crater in the capacity of interplanetary structural analog. G.Dolnikov (1), O.Korablev (1), O.Roste (1) and N. Evdokimova (1) (1) Space Research Institute (IKI), Russia, ([email protected] / Fax: +7-495-3332566) Abstract Popigai crater was formed into two-layer target of Archaean crystalline rocks of the Anabar Shields, In central Arctic Siberia of Russia is situated one of and overlying Proterozoic to Mesozoic sedimentary interesting placing our planet crater Popigai. It is the sequences. Basement rocks are represented by the 4th largest impact crater on Earth but the best Verkhne-Anabar (lower layer up to 10 km thick) and exposed, the three other craters are larger, but they the Khapchan (about 800-1200 m) series [3]. are either buried (Chicxulub), strongly deformed (Sudbury), or deformed and severely eroded (Vredefort). The crater is filled with melted and shuttered material, including microdiamonds and other high pressure minerals characteristic of ultra- high pressure formed during the catastrophic impact. 1. Introduction One of very interesting astroblem of Earth is one hundred kilometres Popigai structure, centred at 7134'N, 11112'E in central Arctic Siberia (Fig. 1, 2), that has been ascribed as nature conservation Figure 2: Space image of Popigai meteorite crater. object of our planet of significant first value [1], [2]. Сlearly showed the inner part about 80 km with a darker tone of forest. In Western and North-Western 2. Popigai astroblem sectors of crater clearly showed exits fragments of bottom old crater and melt rocks (tagamites).
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Impact Structures Provide the Only Ground Truth Against Which Computational and Experimental Results Can Be Com­ Pared
    Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1987. 15:245-70 Copyright([;; /987 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved TERRESTRIAL IMI!ACT STRUCTURES ··- Richard A. F. Grieve Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario KIA OY3, Canada INTRODUCTION Impact structures are the dominant landform on planets that have retained portions of their earliest crust. The present surface of the Earth, however, has comparatively few recognized impact structures. This is due to its relative youthfulness and the dynamic nature of the terrestrial geosphere, both of which serve to obscure and remove the impact record. Although not generally viewed as an important terrestrial (as opposed to planetary) geologic process, the role of impact in Earth evolution is now receiving mounting consideration. For example, large-scale impact events may hav~~ been responsible for such phenomena as the formation of the Earth's moon and certain mass extinctions in the biologic record. The importance of the terrestrial impact record is greater than the relatively small number of known structures would indicate. Impact is a highly transient, high-energy event. It is inherently difficult to study through experimentation because of the problem of scale. In addition, sophisticated finite-element code calculations of impact cratering are gen­ erally limited to relatively early-time phenomena as a result of high com­ putational costs. Terrestrial impact structures provide the only ground truth against which computational and experimental results can be com­ pared. These structures provide information on aspects of the third dimen­ sion, the pre- and postimpact distribution of target lithologies, and the nature of the lithologic and mineralogic changes produced by the passage of a shock wave.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota's Mineral Resources
    CHAPTER • 9 Minnesota's Mineral Resources IN MINNESOTA the production of iron ore is far more valuable economically than the total of all other mineral products, but im­ portant industries are based on Minnesota's other geological forma­ tions as well. Architectural, monumental, and structural stone are produced from granite, limestone, dolomite, and other Minnesota rocks. Gravel and sand are excavated and processed, and clay is used for many ceramic products. :Manganese in important amounts occurs in the iron ores of the Cuyuna district. Finally, although they are often not thought of as mineral products, two of our most im­ portant mineral resources are water and soil. The iron ores and mining operations of the Mesabi, Vermilion, and Cuyuna iron-bearing districts and of the southeastern lYlinnesota counties will be discussed in detail in later chapters, but a few sta­ tistics on Minnesota's iron ore industry may remind us how impor­ tant this geological heritage is. The following is an estimate of Min­ nesota's iron ore reserves, made on lYlay 1, 1961: Gross Tons Mesabi Range 500,799,179 Vermilion Range 9,755,974 Cuyuna Range 36,530,000 Fillmore County 'il,860,337 Total iron ore 549,945,490 172 MI NESOTA'S MINERAL RESOURCES The total production of iron ore in Minne ota to January 1, 1962, was 2,529,737,553 tons. Total taxes paid on iron ore to January 1, 1961 , were approximately $1,257,448,400, a very important source of funds for the state government. Slightly over 60 per cent of the total iron ore produced in the United States has come from l\1inne- ota.
    [Show full text]
  • Symposium on Agate and Cryptocrystalline Quartz
    Symposium on Agate and Cryptocrystalline Quartz September 10 – 13, 2005 Golden, Colorado Sponsored by Friends of Mineralogy, Colorado Chapter; Colorado School of Mines Geology Museum; and U.S. Geological Survey 2 Cover Photos {top left} Fortification agate, Hinsdale County, Colorado, collection of the Geology Museum, Colorado School of Mines. Coloration of alternating concentric bands is due to infiltration of Fe with groundwater into the porous chalcedony layers, leaving the impermeable chalcedony bands uncolored (white): ground water was introduced via the symmetric fractures, evidenced by darker brown hues along the orthogonal lines. Specimen about 4 inches across; photo Dan Kile. {lower left} Photomicrograph showing, in crossed-polarized light, a rhyolite thunder egg shell (lower left) a fibrous phase of silica, opal-CTLS (appearing as a layer of tan fibers bordering the rhyolite cavity wall), and spherulitic and radiating fibrous forms of chalcedony. Field of view approximately 4.8 mm high; photo Dan Kile. {center right} Photomicrograph of the same field of view, but with a 1 λ (first-order red) waveplate inserted to illustrate the length-fast nature of the chalcedony (yellow-orange) and the length-slow character of the opal CTLS (blue). Field of view about 4.8 mm high; photo Dan Kile. Copyright of articles and photographs is retained by authors and Friends of Mineralogy, Colorado Chapter; reproduction by electronic or other means without permission is prohibited 3 Symposium on Agate and Cryptocrystalline Quartz Program and Abstracts September 10 – 13, 2005 Editors Daniel Kile Thomas Michalski Peter Modreski Held at Green Center, Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado Sponsored by Friends of Mineralogy, Colorado Chapter Colorado School of Mines Geology Museum U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Stishovite and Seifertite in Lunar Meteorite Northwest Africa 4734
    71st Annual Meteoritical Society Meeting (2008) 5058.pdf FIRST EVIDENCE OF HIGH PRESSURE SILICA: STISHOVITE AND SEIFERTITE IN LUNAR METEORITE NORTHWEST AFRICA 4734. H. Chennaoui Aoudjehane1-2, A. Jambon2 1Université Hassan II Aïn Chock, Laboratoire Géosciences, BP 5366 Maârif Casa- blanca Morocco (e-mail: [email protected]), 2Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris6 and IPGP Laboratoire MAGIE, Case 110, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris France. Introduction: Silica is a rare phase in lunar rocks; it has been described as either quartz, cristobalite and/or tridymite [1]. Northwest Africa 4734, is an uncommon type of lunar rock, which may be launched paired with the LaPaz Icefield Lunar Mare basalts found in 2002-03 in Antarctica [2-6], it is a coarse grained rock of basaltic composition, exhibits a number of sig- nificant shock features, such as PDFs, extensive fracturation of pyroxene, impact melt pockets and transformation of plagioclase to maskelynite; silica is present as a minor phase. Analytical procedures: We studied the speciation of silica polymorphs to characterize the shock, using SEM imaging, Ra- man spectroscopy, CL imaging and spectroscopy. Further details can be found in [7]. Results: According to the CL spectra [7-9], cristobalite, tridymite, high-pressure silica glass, stishovite and seifertite, are all present. Special emphasis is made on stishovite and seifertite, which, like in shergottites, exhibit specific textural features [7]. Cathodoluminescence spectra characteristic of high-pressure sil- ica phases: glass, stishovite and seifertite have been recorded in addition to the original low-pressure phases. The remanence of cristobalite and tridymite underscores a significant heterogeneity of the shock supported by the rock.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Shock Metamorphism and Impact Melting
    5. Shock Metamorphism and Impact Melting ❖❖❖ Shock-metamorphic products have become one of the diagnostic tools of impact cratering studies. They have become the main criteria used to identify structures of impact origin. They have also been used to map the distribution of shock-pressures throughout an impact target. The diverse styles of shock metamorphism include fracturing of crystals, formation of microcrystalline planes of glass through crystals, conversion of crystals to high-pressure polymorphs, conversion of crystals to glass without loss of textural integrity, conversion of crystals to melts that may or may not mix with melts from other crystals. Shock-metamorphism of target lithologies at the crater was first described by Barringer (1905, 1910) and Tilghman (1905), who recognized three different products. The first altered material they identified is rock flour, which they concluded was pulverized Coconino sandstone. Barringer observed that rock flour was composed of fragmented quartz crystals that were far smaller in size than the unaffected quartz grains in normal Coconino sandstone. Most of the pulverized silica he examined passed through a 200 mesh screen, indicating grain sizes <74 µm (0.074 mm), which is far smaller than the 0.2 mm average detrital grain size in normal Coconino (Table 2.1). Fairchild (1907) and Merrill (1908) also report a dramatic comminution of Coconino, although only 50% of Fairchild’s sample of rock flour passed through a 100 mesh screen, indicating grain sizes <149 µm. Heterogeneity of the rock flour is evident in areas where sandstone clasts survive within the rock flour. The rock flour is pervasive and a major component of the debris at the crater.
    [Show full text]
  • Shocked Quartz, Ir, Sr, and OS Anomalies Found in the Late
    LPS XXVII 239 Shocked Quartz, Ir, Sr, and 0sanomalies found in the Late Eocene at Massignano (Ancona, Italy): clear evidence of a bolide impact. Aron K. Clymer, Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720; Hubert B. Vonhof, Research School of Sedimentary Geology (NSG), Inst. of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1085, 1018 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Thomas Meisel, Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; David M. Bice, Dept. of Geology, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057; Alessandm Montanari, Osservatorio Geologico di Coldigioco, 62020 Frontale (MC), Italy. Shock metamorphosed quartz grains coincident with a positive Ir anomaly of 199 +I- 19 ppb, a positive 87Srl86Sr anomaly, and a negative 187W 1880s anomaly of about 0.3 5 have been found in a marly layer of the Late Eocene Scagha Variegata formation at Massignano (Ancona), which clearly indicates a large impact with an interpolated radiometric age of 35.7 +I- 0.4 Ma. The Popigai crater (Siberia, - 100 km diameter) and the recently discovered Chesapeake Bay Crater (Eastern U. S., - 80 km diameter) are the only known giant craters from the Late Eocene and are prime candidates for the event that distributed the shocked quartz and geochemical anomalies found at Massignano. Although the Middle and Late Eocene are characterized by signrficant stepwise extinctions, the only evidence of a biotic response at Massignano to an impact is a cooler water shift in the dinocyst assemblage associated with the impact layer. Therefore the effects of the impact on this region of the Late Eocene Tethys appears mild, and the global ramification s of the Late Eocene impacts on climate and life remains unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • John S. White Mineral and Gem Collections GENERAL Nephrite Boulder – Trinity County, California Pyrite Navajun, Logroño, Spain 20-11-3
    John S. White Mineral and Gem Collections GENERAL Nephrite boulder – Trinity County, California Pyrite Navajun, Logroño, Spain 20-11-3 12 cm Figured specimen (12) Beryl var. emerald – Crabtree Mountain emerald mine, Mitchell Co., N.C. G5-9-12 5 cm Ocean jasper – Cabamby mine, Majunga, Madagascar – G10-9-1 4.3 cm Ocean jasper – Cabamby mine, Majunga, Madagascar G11-2-3 4 cm Andalusite, variety chiastolite – China 10-2-43 2.7 cm Graphic granite – Madagascar 17-9-3 4.5 cm Garnet color suite – mixed localities G8-11-1 Sasha Siemel Beryl Jaguar hunter Governador Valadares & Minas Gerais, Brazil Mineral dealer 19-4-2 & 19-5-4 These specimens were sold by Sasha Siemel to friends of mine at a mineral show in Doylestown, PA, 1956 Gas bubble in fluorite Cave-in-Rock, Illinois 4-12-3 Russell Feather photo Regional Collection Pennsylvania – Maryland - Virginia Magnetite – Grace mine, Morgantown, PA 4-6-1 6.5 cm Rutile – Parkesburg, Chester County, PA 3-9-16 5 cm Dolomite - Ober & Binkley quarry, E. Petersburg, Lancaster Co., PA 17-2-6 10.5 cm Pyromorphite – Wheatley mine, Phoenixville, Chester Co., PA 6-6-9 9 cm Analcime & Apophyllite – Cornwall mine, Cornwall, Lebanon County, PA 20-10-15 10 cm Quartz – Reading anthracite mine, near St. Clair, Schuykill Co., PA 19-9-7 10 cm Fluorapatite & Actinolite – Silver Hill quarry, Brecknock Twp., Lancaster Co., PA 18-2-18 11.5 cm Wavellite – Mt. Pleasant Mills quarry, Perry Twp., Snyder Co., PA 18-2-19 4 cm Strontianite – Oak Hill quarry, Centre County, PA 21-11-1 5.5 cm Strontianite – Tonoloway limestone, Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • EPSC2018-833, 2018 European Planetary Science Congress 2018 Eeuropeapn Planetarsy Science Ccongress C Author(S) 2018
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 12, EPSC2018-833, 2018 European Planetary Science Congress 2018 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2018 Impact melt boulder from northern Sweden from an unknown source Timmu Kreitsmann (1), Satu Hietala (2), Tapio Soukka (3), Jüri Plado (1), Jari Nenonen (2) and Lauri J. Pesonen (4) (1) Department of Geology, University of Tartu, Estonia ([email protected], [email protected]), (2) Geological Survey of Finland, Finland ([email protected], [email protected]), (3) Oulu Mining School, University of Oulu, Finland ([email protected]) (4) Solid Earth Geophysics Laboratory, Physics Department, University of Helsinki, Finland ([email protected]) Abstract We report an impact melt rock finding from northern Sweden, near the village of Kitkiöjärvi. There is no confirmed meteorite impact structure nearby, thus, the source is currently undiscovered. The impact origin of the finding was confirmed by the presence of planar deformation features (PDFs) in quartz. 1. Introduction Impact cratering is a common and frequent process that affects the planetary surfaces across the solar system throughout geologic time. On Earth, there are 191 confirmed impact structures which are distributed unevenly around the globe. The Fennoscandian Shield houses around 10% of them. Here, we report an impact melt rock finding that originates from an unknown structure in northern Sweden. The semi-rounded impactite boulder, sized 10 × 7 cm, was found by Tapio Soukka in 2017 from a gravel pit at the western side of village Kitkiöjärvi (67°46'16"N 23°03'06"E; Fig. 1). Figure 1: Proven impact structures in Fennoscandia.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidates for Multiple Impact Craters: Popigai and Chicxulub As Seen by EGM08, a Global 50×50 Gravitational Model
    Solid Earth Discuss., 2, 69–103, 2010 Solid Earth www.solid-earth-discuss.net/2/69/2010/ Discussions © Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Solid Earth (SE). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in SE if available. Candidates for multiple impact craters: popigai and chicxulub as seen by EGM08, a global 50×50 gravitational model J. Klokocnˇ ´ık1, J. Kostelecky´ 2,3, I. Pesekˇ 3, P. Novak´ 2,4, C. A. Wagner5, and J. Sebera1,3 1Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic 2Research Institute for Geodesy, Topography and Cartography, Czech Republic 3Department of Advanced Geodesy, Czech Technical University, Czech Republic 4Department of Math, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic 5Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry, NOAA, USA Received: 15 January 2010 – Accepted: 25 February 2010 – Published: 9 March 2010 Correspondence to: J. Klokocnˇ ´ık ([email protected]) Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 69 Abstract In 2008 the new Earth Gravitational Model (EGM08) was released. It contains a com- plete set of spherical harmonic coefficients of the Earth’s gravitational potential (Stokes parameters) to degree 2190 and order 2159 that can be used for evaluation of various 5 potential quantities with both the unprecedented accuracy and high spatial resolution. Two such quantities, the gravity anomaly and second-order radial derivative of the dis- turbing potential, were computed over selected areas with known impact craters. The displays of these derivatives for two such sites clearly show not only the strong circular- like features known to be associated with them but also other symmetrical structures 10 which appear to make them multiple impact sites.
    [Show full text]