DOCSLIB.ORG

Outline of Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Outline of Report Table of Contents Executive Summary Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………………………………..…i List of Maps……………………………………………………………………………………………………....iii List of Tables………………………………………………………………………………………………………iv References………………………………………………………………………………………………………...vi Acronyms………………………………………………………………………………………………………….xi I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................I-1 A. Non-point Source Pollution .................................................................................................................I-3 B. Millers River Watershed Study Area...................................................................................................I-4 C. Natural Resource Characteristics.........................................................................................................I-5 D. Community Profiles.............................................................................................................................I-7 II. Natural Resource Characteristics............................................................................................................II-1 A. General Descriptions of the Subwatersheds .......................................................................................II-1 B. Topography.........................................................................................................................................II-3 C. Soils....................................................................................................................................................II-7 D. Water Features..................................................................................................................................II-10 1. Surface Waters..................................................................................................................................II-10 2. Wetlands...........................................................................................................................................II-14 3. Floodplain.........................................................................................................................................II-17 4. Vernal Pools .....................................................................................................................................II-20 5. Outstanding Resource Waters...........................................................................................................II-22 E. Vegetation, Wildlife and Endangered Species..................................................................................II-23 Rare Wildlife and Endangered Species ....................................................................................................II-24 F. Areas of Critical Environmental Concern.........................................................................................II-31 III. Water Quality ....................................................................................................................................... III-1 A. 303(d) Listed Waters ........................................................................................................................ III-3 IV. Land Use Characteristics...................................................................................................................... IV-1 A. Existing Land Use ............................................................................................................................ IV-1 B. Land Use Changes and Trends ......................................................................................................... IV-5 C. Protected Open Space..................................................................................................................... IV-10 D. Development Potential (Build-out Analysis Results) ..................................................................... IV-12 E. Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................. IV-14 1. Water Supplies................................................................................................................................ IV-14 2. Waste Water Disposal .................................................................................................................... IV-22 3. Bridges and Roads.......................................................................................................................... IV-28 F. Potentially Harmful Land Use Practices......................................................................................... IV-38 1. Underground Storage Tanks........................................................................................................... IV-38 2. Landfills and Illegal Dumping Areas.............................................................................................. IV-42 3. Hazardous Waste Sites ................................................................................................................... IV-45 4. Winter Road Maintenance, Salt Storage and Snow Dumping Areas.............................................. IV-46 5. Vehicle Maintenance Yards and Auto Salvage and Junkyards....................................................... IV-47 6. Septic Systems................................................................................................................................ IV-49 7. On-site Sewage Systems................................................................................................................. IV-50 8. Road Runoff and Combined Sewer Overflows .............................................................................. IV-50 9. Sand and Gravel Operations ........................................................................................................... IV-51 10. Significant Streambank Erosion ................................................................................................. IV-52 11. Forestry Cutting Operations ....................................................................................................... IV-52 12. Agricultural Practices ................................................................................................................. IV-53 13. Golf Courses............................................................................................................................... IV-54 14. Airports....................................................................................................................................... IV-54 15. Land Development ..................................................................................................................... IV-55 G. Pollutant Loading Analysis............................................................................................................. IV-56 V. Stream Team Nonpoint Source Assessments ........................................................................................ V-1 1. Otter River Shoreline Survey............................................................................................................. V-3 i Prepared 7/30/02 by Montachusett Regional Planning Commission Franklin Regional Council of Government 2. Tully River Shoreline Survey ............................................................................................................ V-9 3. Middle Millers River Field Check for Winchendon, Athol, and Orange......................................... V-13 VI. Assessment of Water Quality Protection Measures.............................................................................. VI-1 A. Protective Measures.......................................................................................................................... VI-1 B. Municipal Assessment of Protection Measures ................................................................................ VI-4 Worcester County..................................................................................................................................... VI-10 Ashburnham ........................................................................................................................................... VI-10 Athol....................................................................................................................................................... VI-11 Gardner................................................................................................................................................... VI-12 Hubbardston ........................................................................................................................................... VI-14 Phillipston............................................................................................................................................... VI-14 Royalston................................................................................................................................................ VI-15 Templeton............................................................................................................................................... VI-15 Westminster............................................................................................................................................ VI-16 Winchendon...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report of the Town of Rindge, New Hampshire
    tamp 352.07 »57 1968 ANNUAL REPORTS and Inventory of Polls and Ratable Property OF THE TOWN OF RINDGE, N. H for the year ending December 31, 1968 AND SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICERS for the year ending June 30, 1968 Please bring this copy of town reports to Town Meeting and School Meeting University of TlewHampshire library ANNUAL REPORTS of the TOWN OFFICERS of RINDGE, N. H. for the year ended December 31, 1968 Adams Printinc. Corp I KMi'i y ion. Mass. Nrt q ANNUAL REPORT INDEX List of Town Officers Town Warrant for Current Year 6 Abstract of Business Transacted Town Meeting, March 1968 10 Budget 19 Summary Inventory of Valuation 2 1 Appropriations and Taxes 2 2 Comparison of Appropriations & Expenditures 24 F inane ial Report 2 6 Town Auditor's Report 3 Schedule of Town Property 3 Report of Town Clerk 3 1 Report of Overseer of Publ ic Welfare 3 1 Report of Tax Col lector 3 2 Report of Town Treasurer 3 9 Report of Selectmen 42 Report of Highway Agent 4 9 Report of Pol ice Department 5 4 Report of History Committee 5 5 Report of F ire Department 5 5 Report of Fire Warden 5 6 Report of Trustees of Trust Funds 5 7 Summary of Trust Funds 6 4 Report of Libraries 6 6 Report of School District 7 Vital Statistics 98 Report of Rindge Bicentennial 1 04 Report of Rindge Public Beach Committee 110 Tax and Valuation On Colored Paper Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/annualreportofto1968rind .
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Selectmen Meeting Minutes
    Copy of Approved Meetings Meeting Minutes Board: Board of Selectmen/ Water Commissioner’s Meeting Date: Monday, November 23, 2020 Location: Online Video/Audio Conference Pursuant to Governor Baker’s Executive Order in Response to the COVID-19 State of Emergency Selectmen Present: William Bembury, Peter Sanders Also, Present: Bryan Smith, Robert Holst, Mariah Kurtz, James Loynd, Kelly Loynd, Laura Duffy, Michael Gordon, Kyle Forrest Press: Katherine Nolan, Montague Reporter At 6:31 PM Selectman Bembury called the meeting to order. Bryan Smith explained that the meeting is being recorded and provided an overview of the functions of the video/audio conferencing platform. Discussion Regarding Town Response to COVID-19 No update at this time. Discussion Regarding Good Samaritans at the French King Bridge Incident Selectman Bembury asked Sergeant Robert Holst, Acting Chief of Police, to provide an overview of the incident at the French King Bridge. Sergeant Holst thanked Officer James Loynd, Kelly Loynd, Kyle Forrest, and Laura Duffy for attending the meeting. Sergeant Holst provided an overview of the incident that occurred on November 01, 2020. Sergeant Holst discussed the response performed by Officer Loynd. Sergeant Holst explained that upon arrival an individual was found on the River side of the railing on the French King Bridge. Sergeant Holst explained that the quick actions of Officer Loynd and these good Samaritans that assisted in the rescue of the individual, saved the individual’s life that evening. Sergeant Holst explained that the good Samaritans remained on scene while medical personnel responded to assist and transport the individual. Selectman Bembury expressed the appreciation from the Board of Selectmen to Kyle Forrest of Westminster, Massachusetts, Laura Duffy of Erving, Massachusetts, and Jeremiah Gonzalez of Greenfield, Massachusetts for their actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Northfield Ramble from Mt. Sugarloaf
    Northfield Ramble from Mt. Sugarloaf Total Distance: 41.2 miles Elevation Gain: 1539 feet Degree of Difficulty Index: 1539 ft / 41.2 mi = 37.54 ft/mi Terrain: Rolling Killer Hills: None Geographical Region: Central Massachusetts City/Town: Sunderland, Massachusetts Starting Location: Roadside parking area on Rt. 116 about 0.2 miles west of the Connecticut River in Sunderland, Massachusetts. From I-91 northbound take Exit 24 and go north (right) a short distance on Routes 5 and 10 to traffic light. Turn right onto Route 116 and follow for about 1.5 miles down to roadside parking area on left about ¼ mile short of the bridge across the Connecticut River. Ride Description: This is a lovely ride through several towns in the Connecticut River Valley in Massachusetts. The ride is on mostly flat to rolling terrain and features a great snack/lunch stop overlooking the Connecticut River at a Northfield river side park. After this stop the ride route heads north up to Northfield before turning west briefly and then south through Gill to Turners Falls. There is a very scenic cascade waterfall on Falls Rd near the end of the ride. Facilities and Points of Interest: Mile Facilities - Points of Interest 0.2 Bridge across the Connecticut River 6.2 Montague Mini Mart on left 6.4 Montague Center; neat little New England village green 11.5 Pedestrian bridge over the Miller's River; note confluence of Miller and Connecticut Rivers to the north 11.6 Go under the French King Bridge (State Route 2) supporting truss 13.3 Suggested lunch stop at Northfield picnic area overlooking Connecticut River; views; bathrooms 23.6 Village of Gill; general store may (or may not) be open; alternate lunch/snack stop 27.3 Immediately after crossing the Connecticut River, the Great Falls Discovery Center is on the right, and Northeast Utilities' fish ladder is on the left.
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut River Canals Projected but Never Finished
    Connecticut River Canals Projected But Never Finished Besides the six canals that were built on the Connecticut River, there were, during the period of navigation, a number of other canals strongly discussed and some chartered at different places but not built until the bubble of river navigation burst. In 1825, the War Department had sent an engineer to Barnet who had surveyed three different routes from there to Canada. At large expense, and resulting from mass meetings of citizens held in different localities, surveys were made for a system of canals from Wells River over the Green Mountains to Montpelier, thence down the Winooski to Lake Champlain; from the Merrimac, near Concord, up the Pemigewassett to Wentworth, N. H., and then across to the Connecticut in the town of Haverhill, N. H.; from Concord to Claremont, via the Contocook and Sugar Rivers; from the mouth of Millers River, near Greenfield, to Boston; up the Deerfield Valley to the present Hoosac Tunnel, where the mountain was to be cut through and Troy, reached via the Hoosac River, there to connect with the arteries of canals then being constructed, and thus reaching all parts of the country. A canal was already being constructed northward from New Haven, Conn., to Northampton, Mass. A Canal At Brattleboro In the office of the Secretary of State of New Hampshire is to be seen an act of incorporation for a dam and canal near Brattleboro, evidently intended to avoid the rapid water just below the bridge, which, it is needless to say, was never constructed. The act chartered "The Connecticut River Canal Company," the incorporators being Richard Kimball, Elias Lyman, Amos A.
    [Show full text]
  • Royalston, MA
    Royalston, MA: Formal Trail Inventory Metacomet-Monadnock/ New England Scenic Trail Royalston µ State Forest Royalston State Forest Royalston Falls Reservation Tully Trail Ehrich Forest Warwick State Forest Roytalston State Forest Tully Trail Tully Trail Jacobs Hill Reservation Lawrence Brook Wildlife Management Area Birch Hill State Wildlife Fish Brook Bike Trail Management Area Wildlife Management Area Tully Trail Tall Timbers Forest Stockwell Road The Ledges Birch Hill Wildlife Management Area Tully River Coddings Meadow Canoe Launch Legend Tully Mountain Tully Trail ^_ Points of Interest Quabbin to Otter River State Community Boundaries Tully Lake Recreation Area Monadnock Trail Forest Trails Roadways Tully Lake Doane's Fall US & State Routes Tully Lake Boat Ramp Campground Reservation Other Roads Tully Dam Rail Lines Lake Trail Active Rail Service Birch Hill Dam Trails Water Streams & Rivers Birch Hill Dam Intermittent Streams Lakes, Ponds & Reservoirs Trail Inventory Status DATA SOURCES : MassGIS, MassDOT, the Town of Royalston and the MRPC. DISCLAIMER : The information depicted on this map is for Existing Formal* planning purposes only. All data are representational and are not adequate for boundary definition,Otter River regulatory State interpretat Forest ion, or parcel- IA Trail Parking based analysis. * A Formal Trail is one that is recognized by the town as a PREPARED BY: Birch Hill Dam Trails MassGIS Open Space public trail. Montachusett Regional Planning Commission GIS Department, July 2013 In Perpetuity 1427R Water Street Limited 00.5 1Tully Area 2 Fitchburg, MA 01420 Phone: 978-345-7376 None Miles E-mail: [email protected] /MRPC_RegionalTrailInventory_Update/Royalston_TrailInventoryMap_85x11L.mxd [1:70,00] 07_17_13.
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES Lakesmart Program
    Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES LakeSmart Program Only with YOUR help will New Hampshire’s lakes remain clean and healthy, now and in the future. The health of our lakes, and our enjoyment of these irreplaceable natural resources, is at risk. Polluted runoff water from the landscape is washing into our lakes, causing toxic algal blooms that make swimming in lakes unsafe. Failing septic systems and animal waste washed off the land are contributing bacteria to our lakes that can make people and pets who swim in the water sick. Toxic products used in the home, on lawns, and on roadways and driveways are also reaching our lakes, poisoning the water in some areas to the point where fish and other aquatic life cannot survive. NH LAKES has found that most property owners don’t know how their actions affect the health of lakes. We’ve also found that property owners want to do the right thing to help keep the lakes they enjoy clean and healthy and that they often need help of professional service providers like YOU! What is LakeSmart? The LakeSmart program is an education, evaluation, and recognition program that inspires property owners to live in a lake- friendly way, keeping our lakes clean and healthy. The program is free, voluntary, and non-regulatory. Through a confidential evaluation process, property owners receive tailored recommendations about how to implement lake-friendly living practices year-round in their home, on their property, and along and on the lake. Property owners have access to a directory of lake- friendly living service providers to help them adopt lake-friendly living practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Freshwater Beaches [2018]: Water Quality Data for Public and Semi-Public Beaches
    Massachusetts Freshwater Beaches [2018]: Water quality data for public and semi-public beaches The table below summarizes testing and posting information for each freshwater beach in Massachusetts. Under the state regulations, freshwater beaches must test for either E. coli or Enterococci. Most beaches do not have to post after each exceedance, provided that (1) they take an immediate resample and (2) that resample does not exceed the standard. Thus, a beach may have an exceedance but no days posted. Conversely, a beach may have days posted, but no exceedances, if it was posted for a reason other than a bacterial exceedance (e.g. rainfall, a cyanobacterial harmful algae bloom, or another hazard such as limited visibility due to poor water clarity). Single Minimum Maximum Testing Days Community Beach Name Tests Indicator Sample Exceedance Exceedance Frequency Posted Exceedances (cfu/100mL) (cfu/100mL) Abington Island Grove Beach Weekly 12 E. coli 3 236 312 3 Acton NARA Beach Weekly 16 E. coli Agawam Robinson Pond Beach (DCR) Weekly 15 Enterococci Amesbury Camp Bauercrest Weekly 10 E. coli Amesbury Glen Devin Condominiums Weekly 11 E. coli 2 261 1553 14 Amesbury Lake Attitash - A.L.S.I.A. Weekly 11 E. coli Amesbury Lake Gardner Weekly 11 E. coli 1 261 261 7 Amesbury Tuxbury RV Resort Lagoon Weekly 11 E. coli Amherst Puffers Pond (North) Weekly 17 E. coli 4 240 1986.3 8 Amherst Puffers Pond (South) Weekly 18 E. coli 4 285.1 1986.3 8 Andover Camp Maude Eaton (1) Weekly 11 E. Coli Andover Camp Maude Eaton (2) Weekly 11 E.
    [Show full text]
  • First Half of 2020
    NH Fish and Game Department Habitat Program STATE LANDS MANAGEMENT UPDATES 1ST HALF 2020 A wetland at the Bill Ruger Jr – North Wildlife Management Area in Croydon CONTENTS Region 1- North Country Page 1 Region 2 – Central NH Page 2 Region 3 – SE NH Page 6 Region 4 – SW NH Page 8 Land Conservation News Page 9 WMA Stewardship Page 10 Welcome New Staff Page 12 The Habitat Program at the NH Fish and Game Department manages over 60,000 acres of Wildlife Management Areas, monitors over 20,000 acres of conservation easements, and works with the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources to improve habitats on state forests and parks, among many other habitat related activities. Get an update of the program’s activities on state lands during the 1st half of 2020 by reading below. REGION 1 – NORTHERN NH Connecticut Lakes Natural Area, Pittsburg - CLNA Manager Jill Kilborn completed a timber harvest on the South Bay Bog area last winter with help from other Region 1 staff and DNCR foresters. It will complement the very first timber sale on the CLNA which took place in 2009. During that sale there was a focus on aspen along the winter road that runs through the South Bay Bog area. That work resulted in some excellent aspen regeneration which was expanded upon in this latest entry. One-half to one-acre groups were harvested in the surrounding hardwood stands to promote new understory growth and better wildlife cover. In between the groups, thinning was done to promote mast production of beech and cherry.
    [Show full text]
  • Source Identification and Fish Exposure for Polychlorinated Biphenyls Using Congener Analysis from Passive Water Samplers in the Millers River Basin, Massachusetts
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Source Identification and Fish Exposure for Polychlorinated Biphenyls Using Congener Analysis from Passive Water Samplers in the Millers River Basin, Massachusetts Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4250 Department of Environmental Protection Cover photos: Upper photo shows the confluence of the Millers River and the Otter River in the low-gradient reach upstream from the Birch Hill Dam taken 12/6/00 by John A. Colman.The other, taken 12/18/00 is the Millers River in the steep-gradient reach one mile downstream from the USGS surface-water discharge station at South Royalston, Massachusetts (01164000). Photo by Britt Stock. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Source Identification and Fish Exposure for Polychlorinated Biphenyls Using Congener Analysis from Passive Water Samplers in the Millers River Basin, Massachusetts By JOHN A. COLMAN Water-Resources Investigations Report 004250 Prepared in cooperation with the MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and the MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Northborough, Massachusetts 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of trade or product names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Chief, Massachusetts-Rhode Island District U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286 10 Bear-foot Road Denver, CO 802250286 Northborough, MA 01532 or visit our web site at http://ma.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Npdes) Permit to Discharge to Waters of the United States
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY EPA NEW ENGLAND OFFICE OF ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION ONE CONGRESS STREET SUITE 1100 (MAIL CODE: CPE) BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02114-2023 FACT SHEET DRAFT NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT TO DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC NOTICE START AND END DATES: PUBLIC NOTICE NUMBER: CONTENTS: Twenty-nine (29) pages including five (5) Attachments A through E. NPDES PERMIT NO.: NH0101044 NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: Franklin Pierce College College Road P.O. Box 60 Rindge, New Hampshire 03461-0060 NAME AND ADDRESS OF FACILITY WHERE DISCHARGE OCCURS: Facility Location Franklin Pierce College Wastewater Treatment Plant College Road Rindge, New Hampshire Mailing Address Franklin Pierce College Wastewater Treatment Plant c/o Maintenance Supervisor P.O. Box 60 Rindge, New Hampshire 03461-0060 RECEIVING WATER: Unnamed Wetland Tributary to Pearly Pond (Hydrologic Basin Code: 01080202) -2- NH0101044 CLASSIFICATION: Class B I. Proposed Action, Type of Facility and Discharge Location. The above named applicant has applied to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, New England Office (EPA-New England) for reissuance of its NPDES permit to discharge secondary treated wastewater with enhanced nutrient removal into the designated receiving water (Unnamed Wetland Tributary to Pearly Pond). In turn, Pearly Pond flows into Tarbell Brook, a tributary of the Millers River which itself is a tributary of the Connecticut River. The facility collects and treats domestic (sanitary) wastewater from Franklin Pierce College (“College”) and discharges that treated effluent into the receiving water. The plant is designed as a 0.14 million gallon per day (MGD) advanced wastewater treatment facility that is composed of, in order that wastewater flow is processed, primary clarification, rotating biological contactors (RBC’s), secondary clarification, phosphorus removal with alum (flocculation tank/clarifier), sand filtration and ultraviolet disinfection.
    [Show full text]
  • Prize Bridge 1960 •
    PRIZE BRIDGE 1960 • Prize Bridges 1960 Steel b1'idges selected tn the annual national competition conducted by the Ame1'ican Insti­ tute of Steel Const1'uction as the most beautiful b~'idges opened to traffic in 1960. • AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION, INC. 101 Park Avenue, New York 17, N. Y. • • ~ury of Award A. L. AYDELOTT, AlA A. L. Aydelott and Associates, Architects Memphis, Tennessee THOMAS S. BUECHNER Director The Brooklyn Museum Brooklyn, New YOl'k GLENN W. HOLCOMB President American Society of Civil Engineers Professor, Civil Engineering Oregon State University • Corvallis, Oregon GEORGE LINDSTROM Lundstrom & Skubic, Architects Chicago, Illinois GEOFFREY PLATT, FAIA Architect New York City, New York 'J ; • Beauty in Steel Bridges The enduring beauty of steel bridges is eloquent tribute to the vision and skill of the men who plan, design and build them. The bridge de igner of today is both artist and engineer. He understands the potential for strength and beauty which is inherent in steel structures, and he knows that aesthetic appearance can be achieved at no sacrifice of efficiency or economy. The simple grace of a highway overpass, no less than the majestic sweep of a river crossing reflects a creative integration of structure, func­ tion and form, skillfully executed in beautiful bridges of steel. To promote a more widespread appreciation of the aesthetics of steel bridges and to honor the architectural excellence of modern bridge design, the American Institute of Steel Construction sponsors an annual Prize Brid'ge Competition. Each year a distinguished Jury of Award, composed of leading art directors, architects and engineers, selects the steel bridges which it judges to be the most beautiful of those opened to traffic in the • United States during the previous year.
    [Show full text]