DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

8–12 JANUARY 2018 KISSIMMEE, FL SEIZING THE NEXT DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION See what’s in Check pages 169-172 for details. scitech.aiaa.org #aiaaSciTech A CLEAR VISION FOR THE FUTURE. AT LOCKHEED MARTIN, WE’RE ENGINEERING A BETTER TOMORROW.® Lockheed Martn Skunk Works® has been a trusted partner in creatng revolutonary aircraf and technologies for nearly 75 years. It took a clear vision to produce the world’s fastest jet aircraf, frst producton stealth fghter and highest fying manned aircraf. And it’s that same vision that will allow Skunk Works to contnue developing the world’s most advanced aircraf well into the future. Learn more at lockheedmartn.com/skunkworks © 2017 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Contents Contents ............................................................3 Please be advised that AIAA’s partner for our forums is no longer supporting the conference Organizing Committee ...................................4 app. The full program can be found online here: http://aiaa-mst18.abstractcentral.com/itin.jsp Welcome ...........................................................5 or by scanning the QR code. AIAA is currently investigating a new conference app for future Sponsors and Supporters ...............................6 forums and would like your feedback regarding tools you would like to see included in the app. Pre-Forum Activities .......................................7 AIAA staff will be in the HUB on Wednesday, 0930–1130 hrs, to gather feedback from attendees. Please join us. Forum Overview ............................................ 10 Plenary Sessions .............................................13 twitter.com/aiaa (#aiaaSciTech) Forum 360 ...................................................... 14 Sessions at a Glance.......................................17 facebook.com/AIAAfan Program Details .............................................32 youtube.com/AIAATV Special Sessions and Events .......................161 Rising Leaders in Aerospace ..................... 163 linkedin.com/companies/aiaa Recognition and Lectures ..........................164 Networking Activities ................................. 167 flickr.com/aiaaevents Exposition Hall .............................................168 instagram.com/AIAAerospace The HUB ........................................................ 169 Exposition Hall Floor Plan ...........................173 livestream.com/AIAAVideo/SciTech2018 Exhibitors by Booth Number ......................174 Exhibitors .......................................................175 Join the Q&A at aiaa.cnf.io General Information .....................................182 On-Site Wi Fi Meet our 2017 Best Paper Authors ...........184 Network Name: AIAASciTech Password: 2018scitech Author and Sessions Chair Information ... 185 Committee Meetings/Events ..................... 186 The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) is the world’s Author and Session Chair Index .................191 largest aerospace technical society. With nearly 30,000 individual members from Venue Map ...................................................209 88 countries, and 95 corporate members, AIAA brings together industry, academia, and government to advance engineering and science in aviation, space, and defense. For more information, Notes ..............................................................212 visit aiaa.org, or follow us on Twitter @AIAA. scitech.aiaa.org 3 OrganizingIntro Committee EXECUTIVE STEERING COMMITTEE COMPUTER SYSTEMS SENSOR SYSTEMS AND INFORMATION Rick Tuggle, PeopleTec, Inc. FUSION Pamela Melroy, Forum General Chair, Tom Frey, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Former NASA Astronaut DESIGN ENGINEERING Company Scott Fouse, Lockheed Martin Corporation Nathan Hines, The Boeing Company SMALL SATELLITES Michael Gazarik, Ball Aerospace DIGITAL AVIONICS Jeremy Straub, University of North Dakota Chuck Gustafson, The Aerospace Corporation Douglas Abernathy, Lockheed Martin Corporation SOCIETY AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY Jill Marlowe, NASA Langley Research Center Matthew Kuester, Virginia Polytechnic Darryll Pines, University of Maryland FLUID DYNAMICS Institute and State University Matthew Munson, U.S. Army Research Office Martiqua Post, Forum 360 Chair, SOFTWARE U.S. Air Force Academy GAS TURBINE ENGINES Christoph Torens, German Aerospace Douglas Stanley, National Institute of Steve Gorrell, Brigham Young University Center (DLR) Aerospace GREEN ENGINEERING SPACE EXPLORATION YOUNG PROFESSIONAL CHAIR Tarek Abdel-Salam, East Carolina University Surendra Sharma, NASA Ames Research Center Ali K. Raz, Purdue University GROUND TEST Chris Jorgens, The Boeing Company SPACE FLIGHT MECHANICS FORUM TECHNICAL CHAIRS Kyle DeMars, Missouri University of Kevin Melcher, NASA Glenn Research GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL Science and Technology Center Yang Cheng, Mississippi State University SPACE OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT Greg Odegard, Michigan Technological HIGH-SPEED AIR-BREATHING PROPULSION Scott Burleigh, NASA Jet Propulsion University Dan Paxson, NASA Glenn Research Center Laboratory Subrata Roy, University of Florida HISTORY SPACECRAFT STRUCTURES FORUM DEPUTY TECHNICAL CHAIRS Richard Hallion, Florida Polytechnic University Mark Silver, MIT Lincoln Laboratory Stephen Blanchette, The Aerospace INFORMATION AND COMMAND & STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION – AD&S Corporation CONTROL SYSTEMS Evan Pineda, NASA Glenn Research Center Haoxiang Luo, Vanderbilt University Mike Sotak, Kratos Defense STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS Eric Silk, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center INLETS, NOZZLES, AND PROPULSION Mayuresh Patil, Virginia Polytechnic Joe Slater, Wright State University SYSTEMS INTEGRATION Institute and State University Chen Chuck, The Boeing Company TECHNICAL DISCIPLINE CHAIRS STRUCTURES INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS Scott Norwood, Lockheed Martin ADAPTIVE STRUCTURES Amanda Lampton, Systems Technology, Inc. Aeronautics Company Derek Doyle, Air Force Research Laboratory - Space Vehicles Directorate MATERIALS SURVIVABILITY , University of Wyoming AEROACOUSTICS Ray Fertig Steven Broussard, The Boeing Company Cliff Brown, NASA Glenn Research Center MESHING VISUALIZATION AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AERODYNAMIC MEASUREMENT COMPUTATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS John Hsu, California State University, Long , Engility Corporation TECHNOLOGY Hugh Thornburg Beach Daniel Richardson, Spectral Energies, LLC MODELING AND SIMULATION TERRESTRIAL ENERGY AEROSPACE EDUCATION TECHNOLOGIES Norman Love, The University of Texas at , German Aerospace Center K. Ravindra, Saint Louis University Umut Durak El Paso (DLR) AIRCRAFT DESIGN THERMOPHYSICS Cees Bil, RMIT University MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN Patrick Yee, The Aerospace Corporation OPTIMIZATION APPLIED AERODYNAMICS Ali Najafi, ANSYS, Inc. UNIQUE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL Khaled Abdol-Hamid, NASA Langley FLIGHT SYSTEMS Research Center NON-DETERMINISTIC APPROACHES Virginia Stouffer, LMI Yongming Liu, Arizona State University ATMOSPHERIC FLIGHT MECHANICS UNMANNED SYSTEMS PLASMADYNAMICS AND LASERS Mudassir Lone, Cranfield University Richard Stansbury, Embry-Riddle Andrey Starikovskiy, Princeton University Aeronautical University COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS PROPELLANTS AND COMBUSTION James Stegeman, NASA Glenn Research WIND ENERGY SYMPOSIUM Center Joanna Austin, California Institute of Technology David Maniaci, Sandia National Laboratories 4 scitech.aiaa.org EXECUTIVE STEERING COMMITTEE 2018 AIAA SciTech Forum Welcome Welcome to the 2018 AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition (AIAA SciTech Forum), the world’s largest event for aerospace research, development, and technology. This forum will give you unparalleled access to a diverse range of thought leaders, not only in their own areas of expertise, but across technological boundaries, sparking the collaboration necessary for innovation in our community. Our theme—seizing the next digital transformation—focuses on how disruptions in business markets, the dawn of digital engineering, a profusion of data, human Scott Fouse Michael Gazarik machine teaming, and the latest innovative technology are all shaking up the Lockheed Martin Ball Aerospace status quo and driving the evolution of aerospace. Through discussions and Corporation collaboration, we will consider how our community can best respond and adapt to this changing landscape. The Technical Program Committee worked hard since last year’s forum, putting together the high-quality technical programming our participants have come to expect. There are over 2,700 presentations scheduled across more than 450 technical sessions! In addition, the Executive Steering Committee has planned a plenary and Forum 360 program that will engage and challenge attendees to Chuck Gustafson Jill Marlowe think outside of their technical specialty areas while considering how disruptors— The Aerospace NASA Langley be they people, events, or technologies—are impacting the aerospace industry. Corporation Research Center We have lined up diverse, thought-provoking and compelling speakers who will discuss the digital transformation occurring in aerospace along with many other topics—and they will do so in ways that will challenge you to learn, to think anew, and to engage with your fellow attendees. Another exciting development at this forum is the debut of the HUB in the Exposition Hall—“Where great minds gather.” The HUB, as its name implies, will Pamela Melroy Darryll Pines become a center of activity and will include many attendee favorites, informal Former NASA University of presentations, and even surprises. Make sure to check it out! Astronaut Maryland
Recommended publications
  • The Materials and Components for Missiles Innovation and Technology Partnership, MCM ITP Is a Dstl and DGA Sponsored Research Fu

    The Materials and Components for Missiles Innovation and Technology Partnership, MCM ITP Is a Dstl and DGA Sponsored Research Fu

    The Materials and Components for Missiles Innovation and Technology Partnership, MCM ITP is a dstl and DGA sponsored research fund open to all UK or French companies and academic institutions. Launched in 2007, the MCM ITP develops novel, exploitable technologies for generation-after-next missile systems. The MCM ITP aims to consolidate the UK-French Complex Weapons capability, strengthen the technological base and allow better understanding of common future needs. The programme manages a portfolio of over 100 cutting-edge technologies which hold the promise of major advances, but are still at the laboratory stage today. The MCM ITP is aligned into eight technical domains, each of which is led by one of the MCM ITP industrial consortium partners1. 1 The MCM ITP Industrial Consortium partners are: MBDA; THALES; Roxel; Selex ES; Safran Microturbo; QinetiQ; Nexter Munitions. Funding The programme is funded equally by the governments and the industrial partners and is composed of research projects on innovative and exploratory technologies and techniques for future missiles. There is strong participation from SMEs and academia with 76 participating in the programme to date, and a total of 121 organisations involved in the overall programme. With an annual budget of up to 12.5M€ and 30% of the budget targeted towards SMEs and Academia, the MCM has become the cornerstone of future collaborative research and technology demonstration programmes for UK-French missile systems. Conference On 21st and 22nd October 2015, DGA, dstl, MBDA and its partners will review the last two years of the MCM ITP programme, and present the technical advances that have been made possible thanks to this cooperative programme.
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned

    LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned

    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
  • No. 40. the System of Lunar Craters, Quadrant Ii Alice P

    No. 40. the System of Lunar Craters, Quadrant Ii Alice P

    NO. 40. THE SYSTEM OF LUNAR CRATERS, QUADRANT II by D. W. G. ARTHUR, ALICE P. AGNIERAY, RUTH A. HORVATH ,tl l C.A. WOOD AND C. R. CHAPMAN \_9 (_ /_) March 14, 1964 ABSTRACT The designation, diameter, position, central-peak information, and state of completeness arc listed for each discernible crater in the second lunar quadrant with a diameter exceeding 3.5 km. The catalog contains more than 2,000 items and is illustrated by a map in 11 sections. his Communication is the second part of The However, since we also have suppressed many Greek System of Lunar Craters, which is a catalog in letters used by these authorities, there was need for four parts of all craters recognizable with reasonable some care in the incorporation of new letters to certainty on photographs and having diameters avoid confusion. Accordingly, the Greek letters greater than 3.5 kilometers. Thus it is a continua- added by us are always different from those that tion of Comm. LPL No. 30 of September 1963. The have been suppressed. Observers who wish may use format is the same except for some minor changes the omitted symbols of Blagg and Miiller without to improve clarity and legibility. The information in fear of ambiguity. the text of Comm. LPL No. 30 therefore applies to The photographic coverage of the second quad- this Communication also. rant is by no means uniform in quality, and certain Some of the minor changes mentioned above phases are not well represented. Thus for small cra- have been introduced because of the particular ters in certain longitudes there are no good determi- nature of the second lunar quadrant, most of which nations of the diameters, and our values are little is covered by the dark areas Mare Imbrium and better than rough estimates.
  • General Index

    General Index

    General Index Italicized page numbers indicate figures and tables. Color plates are in- cussed; full listings of authors’ works as cited in this volume may be dicated as “pl.” Color plates 1– 40 are in part 1 and plates 41–80 are found in the bibliographical index. in part 2. Authors are listed only when their ideas or works are dis- Aa, Pieter van der (1659–1733), 1338 of military cartography, 971 934 –39; Genoa, 864 –65; Low Coun- Aa River, pl.61, 1523 of nautical charts, 1069, 1424 tries, 1257 Aachen, 1241 printing’s impact on, 607–8 of Dutch hamlets, 1264 Abate, Agostino, 857–58, 864 –65 role of sources in, 66 –67 ecclesiastical subdivisions in, 1090, 1091 Abbeys. See also Cartularies; Monasteries of Russian maps, 1873 of forests, 50 maps: property, 50–51; water system, 43 standards of, 7 German maps in context of, 1224, 1225 plans: juridical uses of, pl.61, 1523–24, studies of, 505–8, 1258 n.53 map consciousness in, 636, 661–62 1525; Wildmore Fen (in psalter), 43– 44 of surveys, 505–8, 708, 1435–36 maps in: cadastral (See Cadastral maps); Abbreviations, 1897, 1899 of town models, 489 central Italy, 909–15; characteristics of, Abreu, Lisuarte de, 1019 Acequia Imperial de Aragón, 507 874 –75, 880 –82; coloring of, 1499, Abruzzi River, 547, 570 Acerra, 951 1588; East-Central Europe, 1806, 1808; Absolutism, 831, 833, 835–36 Ackerman, James S., 427 n.2 England, 50 –51, 1595, 1599, 1603, See also Sovereigns and monarchs Aconcio, Jacopo (d. 1566), 1611 1615, 1629, 1720; France, 1497–1500, Abstraction Acosta, José de (1539–1600), 1235 1501; humanism linked to, 909–10; in- in bird’s-eye views, 688 Acquaviva, Andrea Matteo (d.
  • Martian Crater Morphology

    Martian Crater Morphology

    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
  • Technology Development for Future Sparse Aperture Telescopes and Interferometers in Space

    Technology Development for Future Sparse Aperture Telescopes and Interferometers in Space

    A Technology Whitepaper submitted to the 2010 Decadal Survey Technology Development for Future Sparse Aperture Telescopes and Interferometers in Space 24 March 2009 NASA Centers: GSFC: Kenneth G. Carpenter, Keith Gendreau, Jesse Leitner, Richard Lyon, Eric Stoneking MSFC: H. Philip Stahl Industrial Partners: Aurora Flight Systems: Joe Parrish LMATC: Carolus J. Schrijver, Robert Woodruff NGST – Amy Lo, Chuck Lillie Seabrook Engineering: David Mozurkewich University/Astronomical Institute Partners: College de France: Antoine Labeyrie MIT: David Miller NOAO: Ken Mighell SAO: Margarita Karovska, James Phillips STScI: Ronald J. Allen UCO/Boulder: Webster Cash Abstract We describe the major technology development efforts that need to occur throughout the 2010 decade in order to enable a wide variety of sparse aperture and interferometric missions in the following decade. These missions are critical to achieving the next major revolution in astronomical observations by dramatically increasing the achievable angular resolution by more than 2 orders of magnitude, over wavelengths stretching from the x-ray and ultraviolet into the infrared and sub-mm. These observations can only be provided by long-baseline interferometers or sparse aperture telescopes in space, since the aperture diameters required are in excess of 500m - a regime in which monolithic or segmented designs are not and will not be feasible - and since they require observations at wavelengths not accessible from the ground. The technology developments needed for these missions are challenging, but eminently feasible with a reasonable investment over the next decade to enable flight in the 2025+ timeframe. That investment would enable tremendous gains in our understanding of the structure of the Universe and of its individual components in ways both anticipated and unimaginable today.
  • Dr. Victoria Coleman

    Dr. Victoria Coleman

    Dr. Victoria Coleman Dr. Victoria Coleman was the 22nd director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Most recently, Coleman was a senior advisor on microelectronics technology policy to the director of the Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society (CITRIS) at the University of California, Berkeley. Before her time at Berkeley, Coleman was the CEO of Atlas AI P.B.C, a Silicon Valley startup that sought to apply AI solutions to sustainable development initiatives. By combining satellite data with other data sets, Atlas AI’s proprietary deep learning models helped create actionable insights for clients across governments, NGOs, and commercial companies. Prior to joining Atlas AI, Coleman was the CTO at the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit organization that supports Wikipedia. At Wikimedia she oversaw the organization’s technology department and technical roadmap, and was responsible for the evolution, development, and delivery of core platforms and architecture. In this role, Coleman worked to ensure an accessible and performant technology infrastructure and anticipate scale and capability challenges for Wikimedia projects. Throughout Coleman’s expansive career she has held a series of senior positions at leading technology companies, including: Technicolor, Harman International, Yahoo!, Nokia, Hewlett Packard, Samsung, Intel, and SRI International. Coleman joined SRI International in 1998 after serving 10 years as a tenured professor at the University of London. She also completed her undergraduate and graduate work in the United Kingdom, earning her B.Sc and M.Sc degrees at the University of Salford and her Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Manchester.
  • The Foreign Service Journal, January 1951

    The Foreign Service Journal, January 1951

    gL AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL JANUARY, 1951 .. .it’s always a measure warn ,0? KENTUCKY STRAIGHT BOUHBOI WHISKEY W/A BOTTLED IN BOND KENTUCKY BOURBON KENTUCKY STRAIGHT BOURBON WHISKEY • TOO PROOF • I. W. HARPER DISTILLING COMPANY, KENTUCKY REGISTERED DISTILLERY NO. 1, LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION HONORARY PRESIDENT FOREIGN SERVICE DEAN ACHESON SECRETARY OF STATE HONORARY VICE-PRESIDENTS THE UNDER SECRETARY OF STATE THE ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF JOURNAL STATE THE COUNSELOR H. FREEMAN MATTHEWS PRESIDENT FLETCHER WARREN VICE PRESIDENT BARBARA P. CHALMERS EXECUTIVE SECRETARY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE HERVE J. L.HEUREUX CHAIRMAN HOMER M. BYINGTON, JR. VICE CHAIRMAN WILLIAM O. BOSWELL SECRETARY-TREASURER DALLAS M. COORS ASSISTANT SECRETARY-TREASURER CECIL B. LYON ALTERNATES THOMAS C. MANN EILEEN R. DONOVAN STUART W. ROCKWELL PUBLISHED MONTHLY BY U. ALEXIS JOHNSON ANCEL N. TAYLOR THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL EDITORIAL BOARD JOHN M. ALLISON CHAIRMAN FRANK S. HOPKINS G. FREDERICK REINHARDT VOL, 28, NO. 1 JANUARY, 1951 WILLIAM J. HANDLEY CORNELIUS J. DWYER JOHN K. EMM FRSON AVERY F. PETERSON COVER PICTURE: A snowstorm blankets old Jerusalem. DAVID H. MCKILLOP Photo by FSO William C. Burdett, Jr. JOAN DAViD MANAGING EDITOR ROBERT M. WINFREE REGIONAL CONFERENCES IN 1950 13 ADVERTISING MANAGER By Alfred H. Lovell, FSO EDUCATION COMMITTEE REGIONAL CONFERENCE AT THE HAGUE 16 G. LEWIS JONES CHAIRMAN By Thomas S. Estes, FSO H. GARDNER AINSWORTH MRS. JOHN K. EMMERSON MRS. ARTHUR B. EMMONS III WHAT! NO SPECIALISTS? 18 JOSEPH N. GREENE. JR. By Thomas A. Goldman, FSO J. GRAHAM PARSONS MRS. JACK D. NEAL THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE FORMER ITALIAN COLONIES 2C ENTERTAINMENT COMMITTEE By David W.
  • MBDA UK CSR for 2018

    MBDA UK CSR for 2018

    CORPORATE & SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORT 2018 CONTENTS Our business overview This is MBDA’s tenth annual Corporate and CEO statement 04 Social Responsibility Report covering the calendar year 2018. Executive summary 05 Copyright statement Who we are 06 This document and the information contained Our Vision, Mission, Strategy & Values 07 herein is proprietary information of MBDA and shall not be disclosed or reproduced without the prior authorisation of MBDA UK Limited. © Copyright MBDA UK Limited 2019. ‘MBDA’ in the context of this document is Our main report defined as: MBDA France, MBDA UK, MBDA Our corporate and social focus – six principal domains 09 Italia, MBDA Deutschland, MBDA España and MBDA Inc. all forming MBDA. Providing assurance to our customers and shareholders 10 Report compiled and edited by Group Directorate Business Ethics and Corporate Responsible business 23 Responsibility. Please send questions by email to: Business ethics 27 [email protected] Company giving and community engagement 31 Our people 37 Environmentally responsive 45 Appendix 49 Antoine Bouvier, CEO As a multinational company operating in many different domains, Corporate and Social Responsibility (CSR) continues to be an intrinsic Excellence at your side part of our business. During 2018, working under the umbrella of our CSR framework initiatives, we MBDA’s drive towards operational excellence “ has been fundamental in establishing the future made excellent progress through our continued commitment to our employees, our customers and model of European cooperation, in developing the communities within which we operate. new customer partnerships to ensure sovereign capabilities and in providing the accessible At the heart of our company are our employees, global market with leading guided weapon who work in skilled teams to deliver our systems solutions.
  • Annual Reports, Town of Acton, Massachusetts

    Annual Reports, Town of Acton, Massachusetts

    AJNNUAL REPORT OF THE Several Official Boards OF THE TOWN OF ACTON MASSACHUSETTS FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31 1940 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Several Official Boards OF THE TOWN OF ACTON MASSACHUSETTS FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31 1940 THE MEMORIAL PRESS. Inc. Plymouth, Mass. —3- TOWN WARRANT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex, ss. To either of the Constables of the Town of Acton, in said County, Greetings: In the name of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, you are hereby directed to notify the legal voters of said Town of Acton, qualified to vote at town meetings foi^ the transaction of town affairs, to meet in their respective precincts, to wit: Precinct 1—Town Hall, Acton Center Precinct 2—Universalist Church, South Acton Precinct 3—Woman's Club House, West Acton at 12 o'clock noon, Monday, thq third day of March, 1941, by posting a copy of this warrant, by you attested, at each of the places as directed by vote of the town, seven days at least ' before the third day of March. > To bring in their votes on one ballot for the following town officers: Moderator, town clerk, town treasurer, col- lector of taxes, one selectman for three years; one assessor for three years; one member of the board of public welfajre for three years; four constables for one year; one cemetery commissioner for three years; two members of the school committee for three vears; one member of the board of health for three years; one trustee Memorial Library for three years, and a tree warden. The polls will be open at 12 o'clock noon, and close at 8 o'clock p .m.
  • DMAAC – February 1973

    DMAAC – February 1973

    LUNAR TOPOGRAPHIC ORTHOPHOTOMAP (LTO) AND LUNAR ORTHOPHOTMAP (LO) SERIES (Published by DMATC) Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Scale: 1:250,000 Projection: Transverse Mercator Sheet Size: 25.5”x 26.5” The Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Series are the first comprehensive and continuous mapping to be accomplished from Apollo Mission 15-17 mapping photographs. This series is also the first major effort to apply recent advances in orthophotography to lunar mapping. Presently developed maps of this series were designed to support initial lunar scientific investigations primarily employing results of Apollo Mission 15-17 data. Individual maps of this series cover 4 degrees of lunar latitude and 5 degrees of lunar longitude consisting of 1/16 of the area of a 1:1,000,000 scale Lunar Astronautical Chart (LAC) (Section 4.2.1). Their apha-numeric identification (example – LTO38B1) consists of the designator LTO for topographic orthophoto editions or LO for orthophoto editions followed by the LAC number in which they fall, followed by an A, B, C or D designator defining the pertinent LAC quadrant and a 1, 2, 3, or 4 designator defining the specific sub-quadrant actually covered. The following designation (250) identifies the sheets as being at 1:250,000 scale. The LTO editions display 100-meter contours, 50-meter supplemental contours and spot elevations in a red overprint to the base, which is lithographed in black and white. LO editions are identical except that all relief information is omitted and selenographic graticule is restricted to border ticks, presenting an umencumbered view of lunar features imaged by the photographic base.
  • Exoplanet Community Report

    Exoplanet Community Report

    JPL Publication 09‐3 Exoplanet Community Report Edited by: P. R. Lawson, W. A. Traub and S. C. Unwin National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California March 2009 The work described in this publication was performed at a number of organizations, including the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Publication was provided by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Compiling and publication support was provided by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under a contract with NASA. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement by the United States Government, or the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. © 2009. All rights reserved. The exoplanet community’s top priority is that a line of probe­class missions for exoplanets be established, leading to a flagship mission at the earliest opportunity. iii Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................1 1.2 EXOPLANET FORUM 2008: THE PROCESS OF CONSENSUS BEGINS.....................................................2