Facies Characteristics and Diversity in Carbonate Eolianites
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Facies (2008) 54:175–191 DOI 10.1007/s10347-008-0134-8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Facies characteristics and diversity in carbonate eolianites Gregory Frébourg · Claude-Alain Hasler · Pierre Le Guern · Eric Davaud Received: 12 September 2007 / Accepted: 24 January 2008 / Published online: 14 February 2008 © Springer-Verlag 2008 Abstract Carbonate eolian dunes can form huge sand Introduction bodies along the coasts but are seldom described in the pre- Quaternary record. The study of more than 600 thin-sec- Eolianites are wind-driven subaerial accumulations of tions collected in present-day, Holocene and Pleistocene carbonate-dominated and carbonate-cemented sand (Brooke dunes from Sardinia, Crete, Cyprus, Tunisia, Morocco, 2001). Two types can be diVerentiated: coastal eolianites Australia and Baja California conWrms that these deposits and inland eolianites. The latter results from large-scale can be easily misinterpreted as shallow marine at core or deXation of exposed carbonate margins and the accumula- thin-section scale. The classical eolian criteria (Wne-grained tion of the material far from the coastline (Abegg et al. and well-sorted sands) are exceptional in carbonate dunes 2001; Abegg and Hanford 2001). This distinction is impor- because the diversity of shapes and densities of carbonate tant as coastal eolianites build huge, elongated, often particles lowers the critical shear velocity of the sediment accreted sand belts (Aberkan 1989), while inland eolianites thus blurring the sedimentary structures. Wind carbonate form scattered sand bodies inWlling continental depressions deposits are mainly heterogeneous in size and often coarse- (Goudie and Sperling 1977; Abegg and Hanford 2001). grained. The paucity of eolianites in the pre-Quaternary Coastal eolianites are formed by material from the deXa- record could be due to misinterpretation of these deposits. tion of beach deposits and subtidal sediments when The recognition should be based on converging sedimento- exposed to wind during marine lowstand episodes (Abegg logical and stratigraphic elements at core scale, and dia- et al. 2001). Normal wave-induced shore input and rework- genetic (vadose diagenesis, pedogenetic imprints) and ing of washover deposits are the main sources of material petrographical (grain verticalization, scarcity of micritic during sea-level highstands. For a long time, the main envelopes, broken and/or reworked foraminifera) clues in coastal carbonate dune record was restricted to icehouse thin-section. Bioclastic or oolitic grainstones showing evi- periods, with abundant descriptions for the Late Tertiary dence of vadose diagenesis or pedogenetic imprints, should and Quaternary times (Johnson 1968; McKee and Ward always be suspected of having an eolian origin. 1983; see Brooke 2001 for detailed Quaternary inventory) and in the Carboniferous (Abegg and Hanford 2001; Dodd Keywords Eolianites · Coastal dunes · Holocene · et al. 2001; Smith et al. 2001, see Abegg et al. 2001 for Pleistocene · Microfacies Palaeozoic and Mesozoic detailed inventory). However, greenhouse eolianites have been discovered in recent years (Kilibarda and Loope 1997; Kindler and Davaud 2001), going against the assumption that eolianite G. Frébourg (&) · C.-A. Hasler · E. Davaud Section des Sciences de la Terre, deposition is constrained to icehouse periods, with large Rue des Maraîchers 13, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland glacio-eustatic sea-level Xuctuations. These variations e-mail: [email protected] would thus not be necessary to the formation of eolianites (Le Guern 2005). Several authors suggested that the scar- P. Le Guern Schlumberger Stavanger Research, Risabergveien 3, city of eolianites in the pre-Quaternary record is due to the Tananger, P.O. Box 8013, 4068 Stavanger, Norway low preservation potential of these deposits. However, this 123 176 Facies (2008) 54:175–191 assertion is not supported by the fact: eolianites, which are producing zone and eolian deposition appears to be com- characterized by high permeabilities and porosities, are plex, making simple rules inapplicable from one case to subjected to the percolation of meteoric water, and contain another. signiWcant aquifers. They undergo early vadose and phre- Icehouse periods are characterized by high amplitude atic cementation and form ridges which are able to resist variations of sea level due to the formation and meltdown coastal erosion even during transgressive phases. Early lithi- of continental ice-sheets. These Xuctuations may favour Wcation is probably favoured when aragonite and high- large-scale emersions and eolianite formation by deXation magnesium calcite particles are abundant. Furthermore, processes. On the other hand, the important carbonate pro- non-lithiWed carbonate dunes may also resist marine trans- duction during greenhouse times probably generated gression, for instance, when located on a leeward side of a enough sediment to deposit carbonate coastal dunes by nor- structural high (Kilibarda and Loope 1997). mal shore input even when the amplitude of the sea-level Their high preservation potential (Hasler et al. 2007a) variations is low. and their occurrence during the Quaternary suggests that Smaller scale climatic conditions also play an important eolianites are probably in the fossil record more frequently role on eolianite repartition. Climatic belts constrain their than suspected, but are misinterpreted as shallow-marine latitudinal deposition between the poleward temperature deposits. The aim of this paper is to document the high varia- limit of carbonate production and the warm, tropical, reef- bility of the facies encountered in present-day, Holocene building realm. The permanence and intensity of trade and Quaternary coastal eolianites and to provide clues for winds favour the development of carbonate eolian deposits. recognizing them at core or thin-section scale. Two latitudinal belts, where the combination of carbonate production and wind factors are optimal and allow maxi- Palaeogeographical and palaeoecological factors mum coastal dune formation (Brooke 2001) are found between 20° and 40° on both hemispheres (Fig. 1). Many factors can inXuence the deposition of carbonate The shore and slope morphology is of crucial impor- coastal dunes. Since these deposits are made of carbonate tance as it contributes to the control of the tidal amplitude sands, they depend on the presence of the latter. The position and the impact of storms. The tidal amplitude may play an of the continents, the climate and the climatic belts directly important role in the formation of coastal eolianites. The inXuence the carbonate factory. Continental palinspastical daily Xuctuation of the sea level exposes the shoreface sedi- and palaeoclimatical reconstructions must be taken into ment to wind deXation, thus potentially feeding the eolian account in the study of pre-Pleistocene eolianites. system twice a day. This process is well documented along Furthermore, the margin architecture appears to be a the macrotidal coast of Morocco where large active dunes determinant factor for the eventual deposition of eolianites. develop (north of Rabat). In the same area, highstand Pleis- Steep rimmed platforms such as the Bahamas are supposed tocene eolianites reaching more than 30 m in thickness to be producing carbonates dunes only during sea-level (Aberkan 1989; Plaziat et al. 2006), testifying to macrotidal highstands, with the lowstand sea-level dropping beneath conditions, are found to be associated with foreshore depos- the rim and stopping sediment input, leaving emerged lands its. Moreover, a coast subject to storms may have an impor- to early diagenesis and cementation (Carew and Mylroie tant sedimentary input right after these events, via the 2001). However, Russell and Johnson (2000) describe reworking of the overwash deposits; on the other hand, important sediment transport over steep cliVs and actual large storms and hurricanes can erode and even destroy eolian dune formation behind these in Punta Chivato (Baja dune belts (Wang and Horwitz 2007). California Sur, Mexico), demonstrating that abrupt supra- Carbonate eolian dunes display many features similar to tidal coastal topography is not an obstacle to eolianite for- subtidal carbonates (Abegg et al. 2001). Quaternary eolia- mation, going against Carew and Mylroie’s assumption. On nites show easily distinguishable sedimentary structures at the other hand, the incipient rimmed, Xat-topped and steep- outcrop scale such as large-scale landward-dipping fore- fronted Rottnest Shelf of western Australia will produce sets, grainXow, and pinstripe lamination, slump-scar struc- eolianites both during highstands because of the huge area tures, animal tracks and often pedogenetic imprints (Fig. 2). of the carbonate producing Xat top (James et al. 1999) and However, at core and thin-section scale, these structures are lowstands due to its emersion and exposure to deXation diYcult to distinguish from those generated in subtidal processes (Abegg et al. 2001). Low angle ramps will environments. The “climbing translatent ripples” or “pin- develop eolianites during both highstands and lowstands stripe laminations” (Fig. 2c) are the only unequivocal crite- (Abegg et al. 2001 and references therein). The presence of rion for discriminating eolian deposits (Loope and Abegg reefs may limit the development of eolianites by reducing 2001). Pinstripe laminations are inversely graded lamina- the sediment’s mobility and the onshore sediment transpor- tions of a few