Cometary Physics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cometary Physics P1: ZCK Final Qu: 00, 00, 00, 00 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN003E-124 June 13, 2001 22:11 Cometary Physics W.-H. Ip Institutes of Astronomy and Space Science, National Central University, Taiwan I. Introduction II. Orbital Dynamics III. General Morphology IV. Cometary Spectra V. Cometary Nuclei VI. Dust VII. Atmosphere VIII. Plasma IX. Origin X. Prospects GLOSSARY Wachmann 3, and d’Arrest with the spacecraft to be launched in 2002. a Semimajor axis of an orbit. DE (disconnection event) The major disruption of a AU Astronomical unit = 1.496 × 1013 cm, which is the cometary ion tail by the apparent ejection of large semimajor axis of the earth’s orbit around the sun. plasma condensation or separation of the main ion tail Blackbody An idealized perfectly absorbing body that from the comet head. absorbs radiation of all wavelengths incident on it. Deep Impact An American space mission to comet Bow shock A discontinuity defining the interface of the 9P/Tempel 1 for active Impact experiments. The sched- transition of a supersonic flow to a subsonic flow as it uled launch date is in 2004. encounters an obstacle. Deep Space 1 An American Spacecraft with ion propul- Carbonaceous chondrites A special class of meteorites sion to flyby comet Borrelly in 2002. containing up of a few percent carbon. eV Electron volt = 1.6 × 10−12 ergs. Contact surface A surface separating two flows of dif- Giotto A spacecraft from the European Space Agency for ferent chemical and/or flow properties. flyby observations of comet Halley in March 1986. Comet showers The infrequent injection of a large num- HST Hubble Space Telescope, an optical telescope ber of new comets into the inner solar system by passing launched into geocentric orbit by NASA in 1990. stars at close encounters with the solar system. ICE International Cometary Explorer, an interplanetary CONTOUR An American space mission to perform spacecraft (ISEE 3), which was redirected to intercep- flyby observations of comets Encke, Schwassmann- tion of comet Giacobini/Zinner in September 1985. 339 P1: ZCK Final Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN003E-124 June 13, 2001 22:11 340 Cometary Physics IHW International Halley Watch, an international pro- will be in 2004 and the sample will be parachuted back gram to coordinate the ground-based observations of to the earth in 2006. comet Halley. Suisei A Japanese spacecraft for in-situ plasma measure- IMS Ion mass spectrometer that can make mass- ments at comet Halley in 1986. separating measurements of ions. VEGA Two Soviet spacecraft dedicated to close flyby ISO Infrared Space Observatory, an infrared telescope observations of comet Halley in 1986 after performing launched into geocentric orbit by ESA in 1993. a series of measurements at Venus swingbys. Jet force The repulsive force on a cometary nucleus due to anisotropic gas emission. The jet force was in- voked to explain the nongravitational effects observed COMETS are known to be the Rosetta Stone to deci- in cometary orbital evolutions. pher the origin of the solar system. The chemical com- keV Kilo electron volt = 103 eV. position of the volatile ice, the mineralogical properties KT boundary The Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary sepa- and isotopic abundances of the dust grains, and finally the rating two distinct geological structures about 65 mil- physical structure of the cometary nuclei all carry funda- lion years ago. This boundary is characterized by a thin mental information on the condensation and agglomera- layer of enhanced iridium deposition that might have tion of small icy planetesimals in the solar nebula. The come from an impact event of a comet or an asteroid process of comet–solar-wind interaction is characterized of kilometer size. by very complex and interesting plasma effects of spe- Mass extinction Episodes of large-scale disappearances cial importance to solar system plasma physics; also, the of life forms on earth. Statistical correlations suggest a different aspects of momentum exchange, energy trans- periodicity of about 26 million years. fer, and mass addition in a plasma flow are closely linked Meteoroid A small solid particle orbiting around the sun to large-scale outflows in interstellar space. For example, in the vicinity of the Earth. the generation of massive outflows from the T Tauri stars NMS Neutral mass spectrometer, which can make mass- and other young stellar objects and their interaction with separating measurements of neutral gas. the surrounding medium are reminiscent of the comet– nT Nanotesla (10−9 T) units of magnetic field strength. solar-wind interaction. The formation of small structures Oort cloud The reservoir of new comets at large distances called cometary knots in the Helix planetary nebula is (104–3 × 104 AU) from the sun. reminiscent of the comet–solar wind interaction (Fig. 1). PAH Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which might be The cometary plasma environment therefore could be con- representative of the very small grains in interstellar sidered a laboratory simulating many basic astronomical space. processes. POM Formaldehyde polymers of the form of (H2CO)n, with n = 10–100. The chainlike polymers could be ter- minated and stabilized by the addition of monovalent I. INTRODUCTION atoms or ions (i.e., HO–CH2–O–..CH2–CN). pc Parsec: 1 pc = 3.086 × 1018 cm. The historical context of cometary research is an interest- Rosetta A European mission designed to collect surface ing document of progress in science. In Oriental records, material from the short-period comet P/Wirtanen with a comets were usually called guest stars or visiting stars to lander to be launched from a mother spaceship orbiting describe their transient appearances in the celestial sphere. around the cometary nucleus. The spacecraft will be One of the earliest systematic records of comets can be launched in 2003. found in the Chinese astronomical history of 467 B.C. The Sakigake A Japanese spacecraft for remote-sensing mea- historian Kou King-ting noted in 635 B.C. that cometary surements at comet Halley in 1986. tails point away from the sun. In Europe, study can be Solar nebula The primordial disk of gas and con- traced back to Aristotle’s postulation that comets should densed matter befor the formation of the planetary be associated with transient phenomena in the earth’s at- system. mosphere. As astronomy started to blossom in the Middle Solar wind A radial outflow of ionized gas (mostly pro- Ages, Tycho Brahe, Kepler, and Newton all paid special tons) from the solar corona. The mean number density attention to the dynamical nature and origin of comets. of solar wind at 1 AU solar distance is 5 cm−3, average The study of comets has been closely coupled with sci- speed at earth is 400 km s−1, and the mean electron entific and technical progress in the past few centuries. temperature is 20,000 K. The most important example is comet Halley, which was Stardust An American sample return mission to flyby deduced to be in elliptic orbit around the sun with a pe- comet Wild 2 for dust collection. The comet encounter riod of 75.5 years by Edmond Halley in 1682. His famous P1: ZCK Final Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN003E-124 June 13, 2001 22:11 Cometary Physics 341 FIGURE 1 Structures of the so-called cometary knots observed at the Helix Nebula (NGC 7293). They are formed by interstellar cloudlets being blown off by intense ultraviolet radiation from the central massive stars. Photo origin: NASA. prediction that this comet should return in 1758 has be- investigations of the nucleus rotation, coma activities, and come a milestone in astronomy. Three returns later, in dynamics of the plasma tail all require comparisons of the March 1986, comet Halley was visited by a flotilla of spacecraft measurements with the observational results spacecraft taking invaluable data revealing the true nature gathered by the IHW and other similar programs. of the most primitive bodies in the solar system. In to- Before the Halley encounters, a first look at the tal, six spacecraft from the former Soviet Union, Japan, cometary gas environment was obtained by the NASA Europe, and the United States participated in this interna- spacecraft International Cometary Explorer (ICE), at tional effort (see Fig. 2). In addition, an extensive network comet Giacobini–Zinner on September 11, 1985. Even for ground-based comet observations was organized by though it did not have a scientific payload as com- NASA to coordinate the study of comet Halley. This pro- prehensive as the payloads carried by the Giotto and gram, called International Halley Watch (IHW), proved Vega probes, many exciting new observations pertinent to be successful in maintaining a high level of cometary to comet–solar-wind interaction were obtained. Because research in all areas. The long-time coverages provided ICE went through the ion tail of comet Giacobini–Zinner, by ground-based observations are complementary to the the experimental data are particularly useful in addressing snapshots produced by spacecraft measurements. In fact, questions about the structures of cometary plasma tails. P1: ZCK Final Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology EN003E-124 June 13, 2001 22:11 342 Cometary Physics the inclination (i), the eccentricity (e), the argument of perihelion (ω) and the longitude of the ascending node () with respect to the vernal equinox (γ ). Their mutual relations are shown in Fig. 3. The orbital period is given by p = a3/2 years (1) where a is in units of AU. Thus, for comet Halley, a = 17.9 AU and P = 76 years. The closest distance to the sun, the perihelion, is given by q = a(1 − e) (2) and the largest distance from the sun, the aphelion, is given by Q = a(1 + e) (3) The total specific angular momentum is expressed as L = µa(1 − e2) (4) whereas the component perpendicular to the ecliptic plane is 2 FIGURE 2 A schematic view of the encounter geometries of sev- Lz = µa(1 − e ) · cos i (5) eral spacecraft at comet Halley in March 1986 and the ICE space- craft at comet Giacobini–Zinner in September 1985.
Recommended publications
  • Mission to Jupiter
    This book attempts to convey the creativity, Project A History of the Galileo Jupiter: To Mission The Galileo mission to Jupiter explored leadership, and vision that were necessary for the an exciting new frontier, had a major impact mission’s success. It is a book about dedicated people on planetary science, and provided invaluable and their scientific and engineering achievements. lessons for the design of spacecraft. This The Galileo mission faced many significant problems. mission amassed so many scientific firsts and Some of the most brilliant accomplishments and key discoveries that it can truly be called one of “work-arounds” of the Galileo staff occurred the most impressive feats of exploration of the precisely when these challenges arose. Throughout 20th century. In the words of John Casani, the the mission, engineers and scientists found ways to original project manager of the mission, “Galileo keep the spacecraft operational from a distance of was a way of demonstrating . just what U.S. nearly half a billion miles, enabling one of the most technology was capable of doing.” An engineer impressive voyages of scientific discovery. on the Galileo team expressed more personal * * * * * sentiments when she said, “I had never been a Michael Meltzer is an environmental part of something with such great scope . To scientist who has been writing about science know that the whole world was watching and and technology for nearly 30 years. His books hoping with us that this would work. We were and articles have investigated topics that include doing something for all mankind.” designing solar houses, preventing pollution in When Galileo lifted off from Kennedy electroplating shops, catching salmon with sonar and Space Center on 18 October 1989, it began an radar, and developing a sensor for examining Space interplanetary voyage that took it to Venus, to Michael Meltzer Michael Shuttle engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Jjmonl 1712.Pmd
    alactic Observer John J. McCarthy Observatory G Volume 10, No. 12 December 2017 Holiday Theme Park See page 19 for more information The John J. McCarthy Observatory Galactic Observer New Milford High School Editorial Committee 388 Danbury Road Managing Editor New Milford, CT 06776 Bill Cloutier Phone/Voice: (860) 210-4117 Production & Design Phone/Fax: (860) 354-1595 www.mccarthyobservatory.org Allan Ostergren Website Development JJMO Staff Marc Polansky Technical Support It is through their efforts that the McCarthy Observatory Bob Lambert has established itself as a significant educational and recreational resource within the western Connecticut Dr. Parker Moreland community. Steve Barone Jim Johnstone Colin Campbell Carly KleinStern Dennis Cartolano Bob Lambert Route Mike Chiarella Roger Moore Jeff Chodak Parker Moreland, PhD Bill Cloutier Allan Ostergren Doug Delisle Marc Polansky Cecilia Detrich Joe Privitera Dirk Feather Monty Robson Randy Fender Don Ross Louise Gagnon Gene Schilling John Gebauer Katie Shusdock Elaine Green Paul Woodell Tina Hartzell Amy Ziffer In This Issue "OUT THE WINDOW ON YOUR LEFT"............................... 3 REFERENCES ON DISTANCES ................................................ 18 SINUS IRIDUM ................................................................ 4 INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION/IRIDIUM SATELLITES ............. 18 EXTRAGALACTIC COSMIC RAYS ........................................ 5 SOLAR ACTIVITY ............................................................... 18 EQUATORIAL ICE ON MARS? ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • MOP2019 Program Book.Pdf
    1 Access Sakura Hall (Katahira campus) From Jun. 3 (Mon) to Jun. 6 (Thu) 10-min walk from Aoba-dori Inchibancho station (subway EW line) Route from the subway station https://www.tohoku.ac.jp/map/en/?f=KH_E01 Google Maps https://goo.gl/maps/VHjgQ9jumBLjexf77 Aoba Science Hall (Aobayama campus) Jun. 7 (Fri) 3-min walk from Aobayama station (subway EW line) Route from the subway station https://www.tohoku.ac.jp/map/en/?f=AY_H04 Google Maps https://goo.gl/maps/keQ1qyWia1cc7dYw6 2 Campus map (Katahira) University Cafeteria Katahira campus Meeting room Meeting room (2F, ESPACE ) (Katahira Hal) (3-6 June) North gate Main gate Meeting point for excursion on 6 June (12:00) Sakura Hall (https://www.tohoku.ac.jp/map/en/?f=KH) EV(to 1F) EV(to 2F) Registration Coffee Poster Oral Sakura Hall session session Entrance WC WC WC WC 2F 1F 3 Campus map (Aobayama) Aoba Science Aobayama campus Hall (7 June) Exit N1 Subway EW-line Aobayama Station (https://www.tohoku.ac.jp/map/en/?f=AY) 4 Excursion June 6 (Thu) – 12:15 Getting on a bus near the venue – 13:10 Arriving at Matsushima area – 13:10-14:50 Lunch time We have no reservation. There are many restaurants along the street nearby the coast. – 15:00-16:00 Getting on a boat ① – 16:00-17:45 Sightseeing Tickets of the Zuiganji-temple ② and Date Masamune Historical Meseum ③ will be provided. Red circles in the map are recommended. – 17:45 Getting on a bus – 18:45 Arriving at central Sendai near the banquet place ② ② ① ③ ① http://www.matsushima- kanko.com/uploads/Image/files/matsushimagaikokugomap2018.pdf 5 Banquet Date: Jun.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Regret Minimization for Contextual Bandits
    Simple Regret Minimization for Contextual Bandits Aniket Anand Deshmukh* 1, Srinagesh Sharma* 1 James W. Cutler2 Mark Moldwin3 Clayton Scott1 1Department of EECS, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 2Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 3Climate and Space Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Abstract 1 Introduction The multi-armed bandit (MAB) is a framework for There are two variants of the classical multi- sequential decision making where, at every time step, armed bandit (MAB) problem that have re- the learner selects (or \pulls") one of several possible ceived considerable attention from machine actions (or \arms"), and receives a reward based on learning researchers in recent years: contex- the selected action. The regret of the learner is the tual bandits and simple regret minimization. difference between the maximum possible reward and Contextual bandits are a sub-class of MABs the reward resulting from the chosen action. In the where, at every time step, the learner has classical MAB setting, the goal is to minimize the sum access to side information that is predictive of all regrets, or cumulative regret, which naturally of the best arm. Simple regret minimization leads to an exploration/exploitation trade-off problem assumes that the learner only incurs regret (Auer et al., 2002a). If the learner explores too little, after a pure exploration phase. In this work, it may never find an optimal arm which will increase we study simple regret minimization for con- its cumulative regret. If the learner explores too much, textual bandits. Motivated by applications it may select sub-optimal arms too often which will where the learner has separate training and au- also increase its cumulative regret.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE 21St July 2013 DAVID JOHN SOUTHWOOD
    CURRICULUM VITAE 21st July 2013 DAVID JOHN SOUTHWOOD Personal Information Personal details: Date/Place of Birth 30 June 1945/Torquay (UK) Marital Status Married Nationality: British Email: [email protected] (work) Languages: English (native), French (qualified to A level, reading writing and conversation, very good), German (Inst. Ling. General), Spanish (O level, reading/writing very good, speaking good) Private interests Reading, Walking, Railways, Film and Theatre -------------------------------------- Professional Employment History Currently: Senior Research Investigator: Imperial College, London, SW72AZ, UK. Past Administrative Positions Director of Science and Robotic Exploration, (July 15th 2008-30th April 2011) European Space Agency, 8-10 Rue Mario-Nikis, 75738, Paris, Cedex 15, France. Director of Science, European Space Agency, Paris, France (May 2001-July 2008) Head, Earth Observation Science Strategy, in Directorate of Applications, European Space Agency, Paris, France (March 1999 - March 2000) Head, Earth Observation Strategy, in Directorate of Science, European Space Agency, Paris, France (October 1997 - February 1999) Head of Physics Department (Blackett Laboratory), Imperial College, London. (September 1994 - September 1997). Head of Space and Atmospheric Physics Group (Space Physics 1984-1986), Physics Department, Imperial College London (September 1984 - July 1990, September 1995 – September 1997), -------------------------------------- Academic Positions Professor of Physics, Physics Department, Imperial College
    [Show full text]
  • Precision Magnetometers for Aerospace Applications: a Review
    sensors Review Precision Magnetometers for Aerospace Applications: A Review James S. Bennett 1,† , Brian E. Vyhnalek 2,†, Hamish Greenall 1 , Elizabeth M. Bridge 1 , Fernando Gotardo 1 , Stefan Forstner 1 , Glen I. Harris 1 , Félix A. Miranda 2,* and Warwick P. Bowen 1,* 1 School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; [email protected] (J.S.B.); [email protected] (H.G.); [email protected] (E.M.B.); [email protected] (F.G.); [email protected] (S.F.); [email protected] (G.I.H.) 2 NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (F.A.M.); [email protected] (W.P.B.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Aerospace technologies are crucial for modern civilization; space-based infrastructure underpins weather forecasting, communications, terrestrial navigation and logistics, planetary observations, solar monitoring, and other indispensable capabilities. Extraplanetary exploration— including orbital surveys and (more recently) roving, flying, or submersible unmanned vehicles—is also a key scientific and technological frontier, believed by many to be paramount to the long-term survival and prosperity of humanity. All of these aerospace applications require reliable control of the craft and the ability to record high-precision measurements of physical quantities. Magnetometers deliver on both of these aspects and have been vital to the success of numerous missions. In this review Citation: Bennett, J.S.; Vyhnalek, paper, we provide an introduction to the relevant instruments and their applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice No. PD-ED-1207
    PRACTICENO. PD-ED-1207 PAGE1OF 1 OF5 PREFERRED RELIABILITY MAGNETIC DESIGN CONTROL PRACTICES FOR SCIENCE INSTRUMENTS Practice: Design flight subsystems with low residual dipole magnetic fields to maintain the spacecraft’s total static and dynamic magnetic fields within science requirements. Benefit: Provides for a magnetically clean spacecraft, which increases the quality and accuracy of interplanetary and planetary magnetic field data gathered during the mission. Programs That Certified Usage: Mariner series, Voyager (VGR), Galileo (GLL), Ulysses. Center to Contact for Information: Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Implementation Method: Because the dipolar portion of a spacecraft’s magnetic field at its magnetometer experiment sensor location dominates the nondipolar part, each spacecraft subsystem is assigned a maximum allowable dipole magnetic field specification based on the magnetometer sensor sensitivity and the distance between the bulk of the subsystems and the sensor location. A typical maximum dipolar field allocation is 10 nanoTeslas (gammas) at a distance of 1 meter from the geometric center of a spacecraft’s subsystem, assuming the magnetometer sensor is mounted at the end of an 8-meter boom. To ensure that each subsystem will meet its respective dipole field specification, several design practices are observed during the early stages of the subsystem design. These practices include: 1. Magnetic Shielding of Magnetic Components A magnetic source can be enclosed in a high permeability material shield, which in effect confines the source’s JET magnetic flux to within the walls of the shield enclosure. PROPULSION The shield should be completely enveloping, with the LABORATORY PRACTICENO. PD-ED-1207 PAGE2OF 2 OF5 MAGNETIC DESIGN CONTROL FOR SCIENCE INSTRUMENTS minimum number of holes and cutouts.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Magnetic Field Technology for Space Exploration E.J
    Low magnetic field technology for space exploration E.J. Iufer To cite this version: E.J. Iufer. Low magnetic field technology for space exploration. Revue de Physique Appliquée, Société française de physique / EDP, 1970, 5 (1), pp.169-174. 10.1051/rphysap:0197000501016900. jpa-00243354 HAL Id: jpa-00243354 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00243354 Submitted on 1 Jan 1970 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. REVUE DE PHYSIQUE APPLIQUÉE TOME 5, FÉVRIER 1970, PAGE 169. LOW MAGNETIC FIELD TECHNOLOGY FOR SPACE EXPLORATION By E. J. IUFER (1), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Nasa), Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, California (U.S.A.). Résumé. 2014 Une observation définitive de la morphologie du champ magnétique inter- planétaire ne dépend pas seulement de la reproductibilité et de l’intégrité spectrale des magnéto- mètres envoyés dans l’espace, mais aussi de l’existence de véhicules ayant des champs perturbateurs négligeables. Un étalonnage convenable des magnétomètres et la possibilité de faire des mesures magné- tiques dans l’espace sont essentiels pour obtenir un résultat. Étant donné le petit nombre de publications portant directement sur la technique de réalisation, bien des recherches concernant la mise au point de matériel pour des observations magnétiques au cours de missions spatiales n’utilisent qu’une petite partie des connaissances disponibles.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Magnetic Flux Rope S
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Portsmouth University Research Portal (Pure) Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics RESEARCH ARTICLE Evaluating Single Spacecraft Observations of Planetary 10.1029/2018JA025959 Magnetotails With Simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 2. This article is a companion to Smith et al. Magnetic Flux Rope Signature Selection Effects (2018), https://doi.org/2018JA025958 Key Points: A. W. Smith1 , C. M. Jackman1 , C. M. Frohmaier2,R.C. Fear1 , J. A. Slavin3 , • A Monte Carlo method is presented and J. C. Coxon1 to estimate and correct for sampling biases in spacecraft surveys of 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2Institute of Cosmology and magnetic flux ropes Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK, 3Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of • Method allows the correction of observed distributions (e.g., flux Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA rope radii) according to the selection criteria employed • Accounting for unidentified flux ropes Abstract A Monte Carlo method of investigating the effects of placing selection criteria on the increases the average rate of flux magnetic signature of in situ encounters with flux ropes is presented. The technique is applied to two recent ropes in Mercury’s magnetotail from 0.05 to 0.12 min−1 flux rope surveys of MESSENGER data within the Hermean magnetotail. It is found that the different criteria placed upon the signatures will preferentially identify slightly different subsets of the underlying population. Correspondence to: Quantifying the selection biases first allows the distributions of flux rope parameters to be corrected, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2106.15843V1 [Physics.App-Ph] 30 Jun 2021 Ters (E.G., [20])
    Precision Magnetometers for Aerospace Applications James S. Bennett,1, ∗ Brian E. Vyhnalek,2, ∗ Hamish Greenall,1 Elizabeth M. Bridge,1 Fernando Gotardo,1 Stefan Forstner,1 Glen I. Harris,1 F´elixA. Miranda,2, y and Warwick P. Bowen1, z 1School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane Queensland 4072, Australia 2NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44135, The United States of America (Dated: July 1, 2021) Aerospace technologies are crucial for modern civilization; space-based infrastructure underpins weather forecasting, communications, terrestrial navigation and logistics, planetary observations, solar monitoring, and other indispensable capabilities. Extraplanetary exploration { including or- bital surveys and (more recently) roving, flying, or submersible unmanned vehicles { is also a key scientific and technological frontier, believed by many to be paramount to the long-term survival and prosperity of humanity. All of these aerospace applications require reliable control of the craft and the ability to record high-precision measurements of physical quantities. Magnetometers deliver on both of these aspects, and have been vital to the success of numerous missions. In this review paper, we provide an introduction to the relevant instruments and their applications. We consider past and present magnetometers, their proven aerospace applications, and emerging uses. We then look to the future, reviewing recent progress in magnetometer technology. We particularly focus on magnetometers that use optical readout, including atomic magnetometers, magnetometers based on quantum defects in diamond, and optomechanical magnetometers. These optical magnetometers offer a combination of field sensitivity, size, weight, and power consumption that allows them to reach performance regimes that are inaccessible with existing techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minor Planet Bulletin Is Open to Papers on All Aspects of 6500 Kodaira (F) 9 25.5 14.8 + 5 0 Minor Planet Study
    THE MINOR PLANET BULLETIN OF THE MINOR PLANETS SECTION OF THE BULLETIN ASSOCIATION OF LUNAR AND PLANETARY OBSERVERS VOLUME 32, NUMBER 3, A.D. 2005 JULY-SEPTEMBER 45. 120 LACHESIS – A VERY SLOW ROTATOR were light-time corrected. Aspect data are listed in Table I, which also shows the (small) percentage of the lightcurve observed each Colin Bembrick night, due to the long period. Period analysis was carried out Mt Tarana Observatory using the “AVE” software (Barbera, 2004). Initial results indicated PO Box 1537, Bathurst, NSW, Australia a period close to 1.95 days and many trial phase stacks further [email protected] refined this to 1.910 days. The composite light curve is shown in Figure 1, where the assumption has been made that the two Bill Allen maxima are of approximately equal brightness. The arbitrary zero Vintage Lane Observatory phase maximum is at JD 2453077.240. 83 Vintage Lane, RD3, Blenheim, New Zealand Due to the long period, even nine nights of observations over two (Received: 17 January Revised: 12 May) weeks (less than 8 rotations) have not enabled us to cover the full phase curve. The period of 45.84 hours is the best fit to the current Minor planet 120 Lachesis appears to belong to the data. Further refinement of the period will require (probably) a group of slow rotators, with a synodic period of 45.84 ± combined effort by multiple observers – preferably at several 0.07 hours. The amplitude of the lightcurve at this longitudes. Asteroids of this size commonly have rotation rates of opposition was just over 0.2 magnitudes.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Opportunities for Radiation and Plasma Monitors Within the SSA Programme
    e Flight opportunities for Radiation and Plasma Monitors within the SSA programme A. Hilgers, P. Jiggens, J.-P. Luntama 1.SSA programme 2.User needs 3.Measurement needs 4.Opportunities Space Situational Awareness (SSA) Programme • Programme initiated by Council decision in 2008 – addresses user needs related to risks prediction and mitigation in the area of orbiting objects, near Earth objects and space weather. • 2009-2012 Preparatory phase – Optional programme with participation from: – Definition – Prototyping • 2013-… Next phases – Member states participation open Systems affected and users • Space systems • Space sector (manufacturers, operators, down-stream • Trans-iono radio link services). • Ground based radio link • Aeronautic sector and receptors • Energy sector (power line • Long ground based operators, pipeline operators, conductor surveying, drilling) • Communication sector (HF, • Ground based electronics transiono) • Magnetic systems • Radar users • GNSS users Type of services needed • Information to avoid, protect or support operation taken into account space weather effects. • Type of information – Prediction and specifications – Monitoring - delayed or real-time – Forecast, nowcast of the environment and effects especially of – the aerospace vehicle – the ionosphere and upper atmosphere – the geomagnetic environment in space and on ground Measurements requirements • Magnetospheric medium and high energy radiation • Interplanetary medium and high energy radiation • Ionosphere and thermosphere density • Magnetospheric cold,
    [Show full text]