DOCSLIB.ORG

Ground and Aerial Robots for Agricultural Production: Opportunities and Challenges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ground and Aerial Robots for Agricultural Production: Opportunities and Challenges University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Biological Systems Engineering: Papers and Publications Biological Systems Engineering 2020 Ground and Aerial Robots for Agricultural Production: Opportunities and Challenges Santosh Pitla University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Sreekala Bajwa Montana State University, [email protected] Santosh Bhusal Washington State University Tom Brumm Iowa State University, [email protected] Tami M. Brown-Brandl University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] FSeeollow next this page and for additional additional works authors at: https:/ /digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosysengfacpub Part of the Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons, Environmental Engineering Commons, and the Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Pitla, Santosh; Bajwa, Sreekala; Bhusal, Santosh; Brumm, Tom; Brown-Brandl, Tami M.; Buckmaster, Dennis R.; Condotta, Isabella; Fulton, John; Janzen, Todd J.; Karkee, Manoj; Lopez, Mario; Moorhead, Robert; Sama, Michael; Schumacher, Leon; Shearer, Scott; and Thomasson, Alex, "Ground and Aerial Robots for Agricultural Production: Opportunities and Challenges" (2020). Biological Systems Engineering: Papers and Publications. 727. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosysengfacpub/727 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Systems Engineering at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Systems Engineering: Papers and Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Santosh Pitla, Sreekala Bajwa, Santosh Bhusal, Tom Brumm, Tami M. Brown-Brandl, Dennis R. Buckmaster, Isabella Condotta, John Fulton, Todd J. Janzen, Manoj Karkee, Mario Lopez, Robert Moorhead, Michael Sama, Leon Schumacher, Scott Shearer, and Alex Thomasson This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ biosysengfacpub/727 Number 70 Issue Paper November 2020 Ground and Aerial Robots for Agricultural Production: Opportunities and Challenges Ground and aerial robots combined with artificial intelligence (AI) techniques have potential to tackle the rising food, fiber, and fuel demands of the rapidly growing population that is slated to be around 10 billion by the year 2050. (Photo illustration by Megan Wickham with images from Santosh Pitla and Shutterstock.) ABSTRACT which subsequently laid foundation for in crop and animal agriculture to in- mechanized agriculture. While preci- crease input efficiency and agricultural Crop and animal production tech- sion agriculture has enabled site-specific output with reduced adverse impact on niques have changed significantly over management of crop inputs for improved the environment. Ground and aerial ro- the last century. In the early 1900s, yields and quality, precision livestock bots combined with artificial intelligence animal power was replaced by trac- farming has boosted efficiencies in (AI) techniques have potential to tackle tor power that resulted in tremendous animal and dairy industries. By 2020, the rising food, fiber, and fuel demands improvements in field productivity, highly automated systems are employed of the rapidly growing population that is This publication was made possible through funding provided by the United Soybean Board (“USB”). As stipulated in the Soybean Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act, USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (“AMS”) has oversight responsibilities for USB. AMS prohibits the use of USB’s funds to influence legislation and/or to influence governmental policy or action. Any opinions,fi ndings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of USB, USDA, and/or AMS. CAST Issue Paper 70 Task Force Members Authors Dr. John Fulton, Associate Professor, Department Head, Mississippi State Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio University, Mississippi State, Missis- Dr. Santosh Pitla, Chair, Associate Todd J. Janzen, President, Janzen Agri- sippi Professor, University of Nebraska, cultural Law, LLC, Indianapolis, Indiana Lincoln, Nebraska Dr. Manoj Karkee, Associate Professor, Reviewers Dr. Sreekala Bajwa, Vice President, Washington State University, Prosser, Dean & Director, Montana State Uni- Dr. Srinivasulu Ale, Associate Profes- Washington versity, Bozeman, Montana sor, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Dr. Mario Lopez, Technical Develop- Santosh Bhusal, Ph.D. Candidate, Dr. Ed Barnes, Senior Director of ment Manager MQ&OFSS, DeLaval, Washington State University, Pullman, Agricultural and Environmental Kansas City, Missouri Washington Research, Cotton Incorporated, Cary, Dr. Robert Moorhead, Director, Geo- Dr. Tom Brumm, Associate Profes- North Carolina systems Research Institute, Mississippi sor, Iowa State University, Ames, Dr. Brian Steward, Professor, Iowa State University, Mississippi State, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa Mississippi Dr. Tami Brown-Brandl, Profes- Dr. Michael Sama, Associate Profes- sor, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, CAST Liaison sor, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Lincoln, Nebraska Kentucky Dr. Carroll Moseley, Syngenta Dr. Dennis R. Buckmaster, Profes- Dr. Leon Schumacher, Professor, Uni- Crop Protection, Greensboro, North sor, Purdue University, West versity of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri Carolina Lafayette, Indiana Dr. Scott Shearer, Professor and Chair, Dr. Juan Ticarico, Innovation Center Dr. Isabella Condotta, Assistant Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio for U.S. Dairy, Rosemont, Illinois Professor, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois Dr. Alex Thomasson, Professor and slated to be around 10 billion by the year 2050. This Issue Paper presents oppor- tunities provided by ground and aerial robots for improved crop and animal production, and the challenges that could potentially limit their progress and adop- tion. A summary of enabling factors that could drive the deployment and adoption of robots in agriculture is also presented along with some insights into the training Figure 1. Classification and Important Application Domains of Agricultural Robots. needs of the workforce who will be in- volved in the next-generation agriculture. address these impending local and global cient crop varieties in research plots, and INTRODUCTION demands (Tilman et al. 2001). Efficiently be more efficient in managing livestock managing crop inputs such as seeds, (Chen 2018). Motivated by these op- AND BACKGROUND chemicals, fertilizers, and labor to boost portunities, numerous teams around the The increase in demand for food, feed, yields and quality while minimizing world have been working on research and fiber, and energy is inevitable, given environmental impacts is important to development of various types of robotic the projected population increase in the support the on-going biotechnology ef- solutions for crop and animal farming. coming decades as well as increasing forts. Agricultural robots combined with Figure 1 provides a broad classifica- affluence in developing economies of the digital agriculture techniques are seen tion of such agricultural robots. Ground world. Food production has to increase as an effective method for monitoring robots or unmanned ground vehicles by approximately 70% to feed 9.7 bil- large acreages to assess crop conditions, (UGVs) and aerial robots or Unmanned lion people by the year 2050 (Bruinsma increase precise management of crop Aerial Systems (UASs) are used in both 2009). Advancements in biotechnology inputs in row and specialty crops, allow row-crops and specialty crops. Robotic are seen as one of the potential solu- efficient harvesting in specialty crops, manipulators (robotic arms) on the other tions for increasing food production to evaluate high yielding and resource effi- hand are primarily used in dairy, specialty 2 COUNCIL FOR AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY crop, and greenhouse applications. Each physically entering the field, or provides Producers interested in using aerial of these robot categories along with some a more efficient way to count or analyze robots on their farms will need to decide examples are discussed in detail in the livestock. UASs can quickly determine whether to operate their own UAS or hire next section. soil moisture and crop health over the a UAS service provider. Service provid- entirety of the field with great preci- ers can standardize operational variables Ground Robots sion. Similarly, UAS-based systems can to meet data quality and application needs be used to measure animal temperature and amortize the cost of the technology Changing weather patterns and the quickly and non-invasively, and thereby over more users per unit time, whereas need to boost agricultural productiv- identify which animal might be in heat or self-operation provides greaterfl exibility ity require a paradigm shift in how have an illness. As miniaturized sensors, in use and access. Similarly, there are field operations are accomplished. For such as microwave radiometers, short- trade-offs in running analyses locally or example, UGVs could perform repetitive wave infrared sensors, and LiDARs (light using cloud computing. operations with great precision for up to detection and ranging), are integrated 22 hours per day (with a small portion of with UASs, opportunities to measure soil Robotic Manipulators that time for service and maintenance) moisture and crop health precisely, map Robotic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multipurpose Agricultural Robot
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Multipurpose Agricultural Robot Gowtham kumar S N1, Anand G Warrier2, Chirag B Shetty3, Gerard Elston Shawn D’souza4 1,2,3,4,Students, B.E, Mechanical Engineering, Alva’s Institute of Engineering & Technology, Mangalore, Karnataka. ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract leveling, water spraying.[3] These functions can be The paper presents about the multiple agricultural tasks done integrated into a single vehicle and then performed. by the single robot. To develop the efficiency of the agricultural tasks we have to find the new ways. This project deals with a novel approach for cultivating lands in very efficient way. The distinctiveness of this agriculture robot system is it is multitasking abilities which can drill, pick and place, seeding, pumping water & fertilizers, weather monitoring to work in both agriculture, afforestation and gardening platform. The project aim is design, development and the fabrication of the robot which can dig soil, put seeds, roller to close the mud and sprayer to spray water, this whole system of robot works with the help of battery and solar power. More than 40% of the population in the world chooses agriculture as the primary occupation, in recent years the development of the autonomous vehicles in the agriculture has experienced increased interest Key word : -ploughing, seeding, pick and place, Sprayer, Toggle switch, Battery, Solar panel. Fig-1: Multipurpose agricultural robot 2. REASON FOR SELECTING THE PROBLEM 1.INTRODUCTION This project objective is to fabricate a robot vehicle Agriculture is the backbone of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Agriculture More Intelligent: Progress of Agricultural Robots
    Review Article Robot Autom Eng J Volume 4 Issue 1 - November 2018 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Lihua Jiang DOI: 10.19080/RAEJ.2018.04.555627 Making Agriculture More Intelligent: Progress of Agricultural Robots Lihua Jiang1* and Yantao Zhang2 1Suzhou Polytechnic Institute of Agriculture, China 2School of Construction Machinery, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China Submission: November 09, 2018; Published: November 29, 2018 *Corresponding author: Lihua Jiang, Suzhou Polytechnic Institute of Agriculture, China Abstract In this paper, we present a mini review to investigate the development progress of agricultural robots from different perspectives including spraying robot, etc. are introduced with their corresponding application contexts. It is analyzed and concluded that high cost and intellectualization areclassification, two major functionality,factors that may and challengecharacteristics. the popularity The current of agricultural technical situations robots. The and development features of trendsgrafting of robot, agricultural picking robots robot, are weeding discussed robot, as well. Keywords: Agricultural Robot; Intelligent Agriculture; Grafting robot; Picking robot; Weeding robot; Spraying robot. Introduction robots, harvesting robots [6-9]. The extensive use of agricultural robots is promoting the modern agricultural production to be Robotic technology has been wide used in different areas, increasingly intensive and large-scaled. such as home service, health care, advanced manufacturing, and agricultural industry [1-4]. Agricultural robot is a kind of Classification and Features of Agricultural Robots automation equipment, which takes agricultural products as the Classification of agricultural robots operation objects with environmental perception and automated working function [5]. It is the outcome of the rapid development With the advent of the era of agricultural mechanization, many of information technology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Robotanist: a Ground-Based Agricultural Robot for High-Throughput Crop Phenotyping
    The Robotanist: A Ground-Based Agricultural Robot for High-Throughput Crop Phenotyping Tim Mueller-Sim, Merritt Jenkins, Justin Abel, and George Kantor Abstract— The established processes for measuring phys- iological and morphological traits (phenotypes) of crops in outdoor test plots are labor intensive and error-prone. Low-cost, reliable, field-based robotic phenotyping will enable geneticists to more easily map genotypes to phenotypes, which in turn will improve crop yields. In this paper, we present a novel robotic ground-based platform capable of autonomously navigating below the canopy of row crops such as sorghum or corn. The robot is also capable of deploying a manipulator to measure plant stalk strength and gathering phenotypic data with a modular array of non-contact sensors. We present data obtained from deployments to Sorghum bicolor test plots at various sites in South Carolina, USA. I. INTRODUCTION Plant phenotyping is a critical step in the process of breed- ing crops for higher yield, disease resistance, drought tol- erance, and other desirable traits. Plant genome researchers must empirically confirm that new cross-breeds exhibit asso- ciated phenotypes, such as stalk width, leaf area, leaf angle, and color. Unfortunately, the rate at which these associations are measured and analyzed is slower than the rate of plant genome research. Fig. 1. The Robotanist in sorghum breeding plots near Clemson, SC. This deficiency is well-recognized by the scientific com- • munity, which has deemed it the Phenotyping Bottleneck [1]. A platform capable of navigating between row crops This bottleneck is caused by a variety of factors, including and deploying phenotyping sensors for sub-canopy data labor-intensive processes, their associated costs, and the collection • necessity of replicated trials.
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNAL and Proceedings of the INSTITUTION of AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS
    ROAOLESS TRACTION LTD·HOUNSLOW·MIDDLESEX·Tel 01·570·6421 JOURNAL and Proceedings of THE INSTITUTION of AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERS AUTUMN 1970 Volume 25 Number 3 Guest Editorial 95 by Ben Burgess Institution Notes 96 Newsdesk 100 Forthcoming Events 104 Publications 106 BSI News 109 The Influence of Cultivations on Soil Properties 112 by N. J. Brown The Effects of Traffic and Implements on Soil Compaction 115 by B. D. Soane Cu Itivations-Discussion (First Session) 126 I ndex to Advertisers 128 Viewpoint 129 N D Agr E Examination Results 1970 131 Institution Admissions and Transfers iii of cover The Front Cover illustration is taken from Figure 7 of the paper by B. D. Soane President: H. C. G. Henniker-Wright, FI Agr E, Mem ASAE Honorary Editor: J. A. C. Gibb, MA, MSc, FR Agr S, FI Agr E, Mem ASAE Chairman of Papers Committee. A. C. Williams, FI Agr E Secretary: J. K. Bennett, FRSA, FCIS, MIOM Advertising and Circulation: H. N. Weavers Published Quarterly by the Institution of Agricultural Engineers, Penn Place, Rickmansworth Herts., WD3 1 RE. Telephone: Rickmansworth 76328 Price: 15s. (75 p) per copy. Annual subscription: £3 0 0 (post free in U.K.) The views and opinions expressed in Papers and individual contributions are not necessarily those of the Institution. All rights reserved. Except for normal review purposes, no part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission of the Institution.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 AIM Program
    A Message from ASABE President Maury Salz Welcome to the 2019 Annual International Meeting (AIM) of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers in Boston, Massachusetts. I extend a special welcome to first time participants, international attendees and pre-professionals. I am confident you will find the meeting a welcoming and stimulating investment of your time. AIM offers a wide array of opportunities for you to gain knowledge in technical sessions, make new or catch-up with old friends at social events, contribute to the ongoing growth efforts in technical communities, and to celebrate the accomplishments of peers in the awards ceremonies. I highly encourage you to engage in the opening keynote session by GreenBiz’s Joel Makower and the following panel discussion on sustainability and the need for a national strategy, which could alter how we live. We as individuals, and collectively as ASABE, will be challenged to think about how this broader vision of sustainability could fundamentally change our lives and the profession. I want to thank our friends at Cornell University for serving as local hosts and the volunteer coordinators. Students work as volunteers to enhance the experience for all meeting participants and you can locate them by their blue shirts. Please thank them when you have the chance. Boston is rich in history and be sure to take some time to experience what this unique area has to offer. I also encourage you to participate actively in AIM and reflect on how you can advance the Society goals to benefit yourself personally and the people of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Robot: Intelligent Robot for Farming
    IARJSET ISSN (Online) 2393-8021 ISSN (Print) 2394-1588 International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology ISO 3297:2007 Certified Vol. 3, Issue 8, August 2016 Agricultural Robot: Intelligent Robot for Farming Nidhi Agarwal1, Ritula Thakur2 M.E. Student, Department of Electrical Engineering, NIITTTR, Chandigarh1 Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, NIITTTR, Chandigarh2 Abstract: With the advancement of science and recent technologies the attention of scientist is getting directed towards two field – Farming and Robotics System. But the combination of two technologies can serve efficiently for many problems by overcoming the limitation of previous technologies. Robotics technologies alone serve very well for the various problems in the field of engineering, medical, military, industry evolution and other various areas of development and requirements, but here we pile together the new advancement in agriculture with robotics to develop the agriculture system which can be used in more complex dynamic systems. This technology provides optimum and efficient solution for wide ranges of production with their merits and demerits. This robotic system is named as agricultural robot. This paper provides a detail review of the Robot. Keywords: Movement, Agricultural robot, Arduino, Robot Architecture, Agricultural Functions. I. INTRODUCTION Farmers are the backbone for food production. In India, with the help of different computation algorithm. The about 56% people are dependent upon agriculture to earn improved specification helps to design, smartly control, livelihood as shown in the figure (Fig. 1). But technical and to make agriculture safe and suitable for everyone. In advancement in agriculture is lesser as compared to other this paper the author suggested that robot will start seeding field.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Make a Good Teacher
    TECHNOLOGY QUARTERLY: THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURE Britain leans towards Brexit South Korea: no place for working women Waging war on potholes Speech therapy for central bankers JUNE 11TH–17TH 2016 Goodbye to the Greatest How to make a good teacher Contents The Economist June 11th 2016 5 8 The world this week 37 Chicago’s museum wars Light against dark 38 Cannabis in the capital Leaders Federal haze 13 Education 39 Southern men How to make a good Bill Luckett teacher 40 Lexington 14 Brexit Doing Trump’s work Jeremy Corbyn, saboteur 14 Fund management Slow-motion revolution The Americas Brexit: leaning out 15 Agricultural technology 41 Peru’s election Britain’s flirtation with Brexit Feeding the ten billion The fortunate president is more complicated than an 16 The trade in albino bones 42 Corruption in Guatemala Bad apples everywhere anti-globalisation vote: On the cover For the colour of their skin Bagehot, page 57. Lacklustre 42 Canada’s far north What matters in schools is and poorly led, the Labour Airships in the Arctic teachers. Fortunately, Letters Party is letting down the teaching can be taught: 44 Bello Remain campaign: leader, 18 On tuberculosis, China’s leader, page 13. Great The Mexican blues page 14. Most European Florida, Indian textiles, teaching has long been seen bosses are twitchy about Arab history, Essex, as an innate skill. But Brexit; a few spy an Brazil, moderation Technology Quarterly reformers are showing that opportunity: Schumpeter, the best teachers are made, The future of agriculture page 66 After page 44 not
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design of Modular Multi Functional Agricultural Mobile Robot
    RURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DOI: 10.22616/rrd.24.2018.031 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF MODULAR MULTI FUNCTIONAL AGRICULTURAL MOBILE ROBOT Aldis Pecka, Vitalijs Osadcuks Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Latvia [email protected] Abstract In order to improve competitiveness in today’s business environment, farmers also have to think about the rapid technological development in their enterprises. The most important factor that can positively influence the progress of the agricultural sector is the application of modern, efficient and labor-saving technologies at the various stages of crop growing and processing. Introduction of robotics in the farming processes emerges as one of the options. Current state of technologies allows only a few tasks processed by robots to be technologically and economically viably; the most relevant example is lawn mowing robots. One of the issues that prevents widespread use of robots in agriculture is that there are still no regulations or standards in the robotic sector for the industry to allow each robot manufacturer to follow them, such as mountable equipment communication protocols, dimensions of chassis and body, control systems including sensors and actuators etc. Each robot developer chooses his own approach and interpretation in robot protocols and modules. This article presents a conceptual design of mobile robot “Formica 01” for various agricultural applications. A prototype of the proposed design has been developed and in the article various cases of its usage on strawberry fields have been described. Key words: agricultural, mobile robot, modular. Introduction Verdouw, & Bogaardt, 2017). In automation of Food demand in the world is increasingly growing, greenhouse operations, where the environment is more especially it is relevant for traditional European-type predictable, stationary industrial robots in the form of food.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Agriculture, Precision Agriculture, and Vertical Farming
    IFPRI Discussion Paper 01814 March 2019 Protected Agriculture, Precision Agriculture, and Vertical Farming Brief Reviews of Issues in the Literature Focusing on the Developing Region in Asia Hiroyuki Takeshima Pramod Kumar Joshi Development Strategy and Governance Division South Asia Regional Office INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), established in 1975, provides research-based policy solutions to sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition. IFPRI’s strategic research aims to foster a climate-resilient and sustainable food supply; promote healthy diets and nutrition for all; build inclusive and efficient markets, trade systems, and food industries; transform agricultural and rural economies; and strengthen institutions and governance. Gender is integrated in all the Institute’s work. Partnerships, communications, capacity strengthening, and data and knowledge management are essential components to translate IFPRI’s research from action to impact. The Institute’s regional and country programs play a critical role in responding to demand for food policy research and in delivering holistic support for country-led development. IFPRI collaborates with partners around the world. AUTHORS Hiroyuki Takeshima ([email protected]) is a Senior Research Fellow in the Development Strategy and Governance Division of the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Pramod Kumar Joshi ([email protected]) is the Director of IFPRI’s South Asia Regional Office (SAR). Notices 1 IFPRI Discussion Papers contain preliminary material and research results and are circulated in order to stimulate discussion and critical comment. They have not been subject to a formal external review via IFPRI’s Publications Review Committee. Any opinions stated herein are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily representative of or endorsed by IFPRI.
    [Show full text]
  • AGRICULTURE 4.0 Agricultural Robotics and Automated Equipment for Sustainable Crop Production
    ISSN 1020-4555 Integrated Crop Management Vol. 24 | 2020 AGRICULTURE 4.0 Agricultural robotics and automated equipment for sustainable crop production Start Integrated Crop Management Vo.l 24 | 2020 AGRICULTURE 4.0 Agricultural robotics and automated equipment for sustainable crop production By Santiago Santos Valle, Agricultural Mechanization Specialist, FAO Josef Kienzle, Agricultural Engineer, FAO NOVEMBER 2020 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2020 Required citation: Santos Valle, S. and Kienzle, J. 2020. Agriculture 4.0 – Agricultural robotics and automated equipment for sustainable crop production. Integrated Crop Management Vol. 24. Rome, FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISSN 1020-4555 © FAO, 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode).
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Bioresearch Vol
    International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Bioresearch Vol. 06, No. 01; 2021 ISSN: 2456-8643 A NEW ERA FOR SUSTAINABLE FARMING SYSTEMS FOR GREECE, BASED ON CONVERGENCE OF SMART FARMING, AGRICULTURAL ROBOTICS AND GEOSPATIAL TECHNOLOGIES Dr. Avraam Mavridis Perrotis College, American Farm School, Thessaloniki, Greece Dr. Athanasios Gertsis Perrotis College, American Farm School, Thessaloniki, Greece https://doi.org/10.35410/IJAEB.2021.5607 ABSTRACT Safety and quality of agricultural products with better management and conservation of natural resources has become a significant issue worldwide and it constantly raises awareness in Greece, especially within the last decade. Latest advancements of the evolving agricultural sector towards applications of Precision Agriculture and Smart/Digital Farming and the “greening” of the agriculture based on the latest directives of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union (EU) for the current and the upcoming period (>2022) and the Green Deal , constitute a rigid framework of promising future opportunities and transformations. Additionally, new and emerging cultivation practices, like soilless farming (e.g., Hydroponics, Aquaponics, Aeroponics, vertical agriculture) and intensive, Integrated Agriculture and minimum tillage cropping systems, constitute high-tech solutions of production in Greece. However, as they require significant agrochemical inputs, high energy consumption vehicles and expensive infrastructures, they keep on polluting and exhausting the natural resources. An alternative, sustainable solution, based in latest technological advancements, is urgently needed. In this chapter, an approach is presented for the convergence of Smart Farming, Agricultural Robotics with Geospatial Technologies, providing solutions of their efficient collaboration towards farming practices. Focus will be given to the accumulated promises and opportunities which arise and they may constitute a new, innovative, and sustainable model of agriculture for Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Precision Farming: Cheating Malthus with Digital Agriculture
    EQUITY RESEARCH | July 13, 2016 Innovation flourishes where there Jerry Revich, CFA (212) 902-4116 are big problems to solve, and jerry.revich @gs.com few problems are as large as the Goldman, Sachs & Co. need to feed the world. In the Robert Koort, CFA latest in our Profiles in (713) 654-8480 robert.koort @gs.com Innovation series, we explore Goldman, Sachs & Co. how agriculture offers fertile ground for a confluence of Patrick Archambault, CFA (212) 902-2817 technology trends, from sensors patrick.archambault @gs.com and the Internet of Things to Goldman, Sachs & Co. drones, big data and autonomous driving. We see the potential for Adam Samuelson (212) 902-6764 Precision Farming to lift crop adam.samuelson @gs.com yields 70% by 2050 and create a Goldman, Sachs & Co. $240 billion market for farm tech, Michael Nannizzi adding to agriculture’s long (917) 343-2726 michael.nannizzi @gs.com history of holding off a Goldman, Sachs & Co. Malthusian crisis. Mohammed Moawalla +44(20)7774-1726 mohammed.moawalla @gs.com Goldman Sachs International Andrew Bonin (917) 343-1445 andrew.bonin @gs.com Goldman, Sachs & Co. PROFILES IN INNOVATION Precision Farming Cheating Malthus with Digital Agriculture Goldman Sachs does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. For Reg AC certification and other important disclosures, see the Disclosure Appendix, or go to www.gs.com/research/hedge.html.
    [Show full text]