Distribution Agreement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Distribution Agreement CONFIDENTIAL, NON-PRECEDENTIAL DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT “UNTITLED ERIC SINGER PROJECT” As of May 15, 2012 This agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into between Sony Pictures Worldwide Acquisitions Inc. (“SPWA”) and Panorama Media LLC (“Agent”), as agent for White Dog Productions LLC (“Owner”; Agent and Owner shall be collectively referred to herein as “Licensor”), confirming SPWA’s acquisition of certain rights to the motion picture (and all versions thereof) tentatively entitled “Untitled Eric Singer Project” a/k/a “American Hustle”, “American Bullshit” and “American Sting” (the “Picture”). For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties have agreed to the following: 1. Conditions Precedent. All of SPWA’s obligations hereunder shall be subject to and conditioned upon the satisfaction of all of the following conditions precedent (collectively, the “Conditions Precedent”): 1.1. Executed Documents. Full execution of this Agreement and the Instrument of Transfer (in the form attached hereto as Schedule D). 1.2. Chain of Title. SPWA’s written approval of all documents (including, without limitation, any and all releases which Licensor, in consultation with SPWA, may require from actual persons, if any, who may be portrayed or depicted, in whole or part, in the Picture) and the copyright status of all materials upon which the Picture is based, evidencing Licensor’s clear and unencumbered chain of title with respect to the Picture and each and every element thereof and the production, distribution and other exploitation thereof and Licensor’s ownership of all rights in the Picture required in order for Licensor to grant to SPWA all rights granted herein, free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances (collectively, the “Chain of Title”). 1.3. Security Documents. Licensor’s execution and delivery to SPWA of such security documents (in accordance with Paragraph 21.below) and other instruments consistent herewith as SPWA may require to evidence and and/or perfect its security interest and other rights in the Picture, including, without limitation, a short form Instrument of Transfer in the form attached hereto as Schedule “D”, a Security Agreement and Mortgage of Copyright in the form attached hereto as Schedule “G”, and UCC-1 Financing Statements in form and substance satisfactory to SPWA. 1.4. Insurance Policies. Licensor’s procurement of insurance policies and delivery to SPWA of copies of such policies and certificates of insurance in accordance with the requirements of Paragraph 17 of this Agreement. 1 E:\LEGAL\STEINBERG\PANORAMA\AMBULL\DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT 5.1.DOCX CONFIDENTIAL, NON-PRECEDENTIAL 1.5. Columbia Distribution Agreement. Licensor’s conclusion of a distribution agreement with Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. (“Columbia”) with respect to the wide theatrical release of the Picture in the United States. 2. Picture Specifications/Completed Picture Specifications/Domestic Release Obligation. 2.1. Picture Specifications. The specifications for the Picture are set forth below (collectively with the Completed Picture Specifications set forth in Paragraph 2.2, the “Picture Specifications”). All such Picture Specifications shall be approved (or pre-approved as may be specifically indicated herein) by SPWA in SPWA’s sole discretion in writing. Substitutions or changes to approved Picture Specifications shall be subject to SPWA’s prior written approval exercisable in SPWA’s sole discretion. SPWA’s Executive Vice President of Legal Affairs is hereby designated as SPWA’s sole designee for purposes of all approvals hereunder. It is Licensor’s responsibility to confirm that all of SPWA’s approval rights as set forth hereunder have been satisfied in writing and Licensor acknowledges that, except as may be specifically set forth herein, Licensor shall never rely on SPWA’s silence or inactivity as either approval or a waiver of any of the approval rights hereunder. 2.1.1. Approved Screenplay. The Picture shall utilize the final shooting script written by Eric Singer dated as of February 18, 2013 or such other final shooting script approved in advance in writing by SPWA in SPWA’s sole discretion or by Columbia (once approved, the “Approved Screenplay”). Except as otherwise approved by SPWA in writing, the Picture shall be based upon and conform to the Approved Screenplay subject only to incidental, non-material changes resulting from the exigencies of production and customary non-material directorial changes. 2.1.2. Director. The Picture’s director shall be David O’Russell (“Director”). SPWA shall have approval over any replacement(s) of the Director, such approval not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Licensor agrees that the form and substance of the Director’s agreement in connection the Picture, shall conform to standard industry practices and Director’s precedent (e.g., not contain any unusual credit provisions). Licensor acknowledges that, subject to the terms of any applicable guild, the Director shall render directing services so as to ensure that the Picture materially adheres to: (i) the Approved Screenplay; and (ii) the Approved Budget (as defined below). 2.1.3. Principal Cast. SPWA shall have approval over the selection of the following principal cast (and any replacements thereof) (individually and collectively, “Principal Cast”). SPWA approves Christian Bale (“Bale”) in the role of “Melvin Weinberg” and Bradley Cooper (“Cooper”) in the role of “Jimmy Boyle”. Licensor agrees that the form and substance of each agreement in connection the engagement of Principal Cast will conform to standard industry practices for talent of comparable stature, shall be consistent with such talent’s precedent and shall not include any non-customary limitations on use of likeness, credit and/or marketing and promotional services. 2.1.4. Essential Elements. Bale and Cooper in the roles set forth in the preceding Paragraph shall each be an essential element, the absence of which shall relieve E:\LEGAL\STEINBERG\PANORAMA\AMBULL\DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT 5.1.DOCX 2 CONFIDENTIAL, NON-PRECEDENTIAL SPWA of any and all of its obligations hereunder (each, an “Essential Element”). 2.1.5. Credit Approval. Except as set forth in the pre-existing “Approved Agreements” (as defined below), SPWA and Licensor shall have mutual approval over (i) the according of any likeness guarantees, (ii) the grant of any likeness tie-ins between/among cast members, and (iii) the according of artwork title credit. For purposes hereof, “Approved Agreements” shall mean the following agreements which were concluded prior to SPWA’s involvement in the Picture and which were delivered to SPWA prior to execution hereof, (i) the agreement for the directing services of Director, and (ii) the agreements for the acting services of Bale and Cooper. 2.1.6. Approved Budget. The Picture shall be produced according to a minimum budget approved by SPWA, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed (once approved, the “Approved Budget”). SPWA pre-approves an Approved Budget which shall not be less than Forty Million U.S. Dollars (US$40,000,000). 2.1.7. Special Processes. Unless approved by SPWA in advance, Licensor shall not utilize any special photographic, audio and technical processes for the Picture which impact the commercial viability of the Picture and/or SPWA’s costs of exploiting the Picture (e.g., increased duplication costs). 2.2. Completed Picture Specifications. Licensor represents and warrants that upon delivery to SPWA, the Picture shall meet all of the following specifications (collectively, the “Completed Picture Specifications”): 2.2.1. The Picture. Licensor shall deliver a new and original feature-length motion picture of first class technical quality. The Picture shall be completed and delivered to SPWA on or before the Delivery Date (as defined herein), time being of the essence. 2.2.2. Actual Negative Cost. The Picture’s aggregate, certifiable, final cash production cost (“Actual Negative Cost”) shall be no less than Ninety Percent (90%) of the Approved Budget, certified as to its accuracy by the director, the line producer and the production accountant and completion guarantor for the Picture. Actual Negative Cost shall mean the aggregate sum of all costs and expenses directly related to the Picture actually paid in connection with the development, preparation, production, completion, and Delivery (as defined herein) of the Picture, as set forth in the Approved Budget. Additionally, such Actual Negative Cost: (i) shall include, without limitation, the producing fees and all financing and completion bond related costs and/or fees; (ii) shall exclude any contingent compensation (whether in gross receipts or otherwise) and/or amounts contingent on the level of financial performance of the Picture; and (iii) shall be net of: (A) any production savings; (B) any unspent contingency and/or (C) any subsidies, credits or rebates. Licensor shall, within thirty (30) days of Delivery, provide SPWA with an “Actual Negative Cost Statement”, certified as true and correct by the production accountant and by a duly-authorized officer of Licensor. Any such statement not objected to within two (2) years of issuance shall be deemed true and correct and binding upon SPWA. SPWA shall have the right upon fifteen (15) days notice to examine Licensor’s books and records with respect to the Actual Negative Cost for the purpose of determining the E:\LEGAL\STEINBERG\PANORAMA\AMBULL\DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT 5.1.DOCX
Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    CINEMATOGRAPHY Mailing List the first 5 years Introduction This book consists of edited conversations between DP’s, Gaffer’s, their crew and equipment suppliers. As such it doesn’t have the same structure as a “normal” film reference book. Our aim is to promote the free exchange of ideas among fellow professionals, the cinematographer, their camera crew, manufacturer's, rental houses and related businesses. Kodak, Arri, Aaton, Panavision, Otto Nemenz, Clairmont, Optex, VFG, Schneider, Tiffen, Fuji, Panasonic, Thomson, K5600, BandPro, Lighttools, Cooke, Plus8, SLF, Atlab and Fujinon are among the companies represented. As we have grown, we have added lists for HD, AC's, Lighting, Post etc. expanding on the original professional cinematography list started in 1996. We started with one list and 70 members in 1996, we now have, In addition to the original list aimed soley at professional cameramen, lists for assistant cameramen, docco’s, indies, video and basic cinematography. These have memberships varying from around 1,200 to over 2,500 each. These pages cover the period November 1996 to November 2001. Join us and help expand the shared knowledge:- www.cinematography.net CML – The first 5 Years…………………………. Page 1 CINEMATOGRAPHY Mailing List the first 5 years Page 2 CINEMATOGRAPHY Mailing List the first 5 years Introduction................................................................ 1 Shooting at 25FPS in a 60Hz Environment.............. 7 Shooting at 30 FPS................................................... 17 3D Moving Stills......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Film Printing
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 Film Technology in Post Production 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40 1 2 3111 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 1 2 3 Film Technology 4 5 6 in Post Production 7 8 9 10 1 2 Second edition 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 1 Dominic Case 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40 1 2 3111 4 5 6 7 8 Focal Press 9 OXFORD AUCKLAND BOSTON JOHANNESBURG MELBOURNE NEW DELHI 1 Focal Press An imprint of Butterworth-Heinemann Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP 225 Wildwood Avenue, Woburn, MA 01801-2041 A division of Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd A member of the Reed Elsevier plc group First published 1997 Reprinted 1998, 1999 Second edition 2001 © Dominic Case 2001 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright holder except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, England W1P 0LP. Applications for the copyright holder’s written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publishers British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalogue record
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter: Issue
    IN THIS ISSUE AMIA Celebrating 25 Years 2015 Election Results The Reel Thing At the Membership Meeting in Portland we’ll In its 35th incarnation, The Reel Thing reflected welcome a new president and new directors of the increasingly accepted reality that all the Board. moving image archivists must now contend with the digital realm in our work. ALSO Conference Mobile App 3 Partners and Sponsors 3 Election Results 3 AMIA Webinar Series 3 Online Learning Series AMIA Technology Flashback 5 On Demand The September and October webinar recordings The Reel Thing: Los Angeles 7 are now available on demand. AMIA@ALA 11 Fall . 2015 News from the Field 18 Volume 110 AMIA NEWSLETTER | Volume 110 2 AMIA’s Back in Portland Are you ready for #AMIA15? Twenty six years ago a group of F/TAAC (Film and Television Archives Advisory Committee) members proposed the creation of AMIA – just blocks away from this year’s conference hotel at the Oregon Historical Society. The “Future of AMIA” committee prepared a ballot, drafted bylaws and held a vote of “all individuals in the field who had participated in at least two F/TAAC conferences since 1984. 68 ballots came back, and AMIA was officially born. More than 100 people joined the new organization in its first year and attended its first conferences. Twenty five years later, we’re back in Portland and my, how we’ve grown! For AMIA 2015 - 543 attendees (so far) 131 presenters 53 sessions 8 screening events 6 workshops 2 symposiums 1 Hack Day And more than 3,000 cups of coffee will be served Anniversaries offer us a great opportunity to reflect on our past and, more Thank you to Lydia Pappas for this image importantly, take what we’ve learned to look towards the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Grayscale Transformations of Cineon Digital Film Data
    Grayscale Transformations of Cineon Digital Film Data for Display, Conversion, and Film Recording Version 1.1 April 12, 1993 Cinesite Digital Film Center 1017 N. Las Palmas Av. Suite 300 Hollywood, CA 90038 TELE: 213-468-4400 FAX: 213-468-4404 Version 1.1 Page 1 of 22 Contents 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................... 3 2.0 The Film System ................................................................ 3 3.0 The Cineon Digital Negative ............................................. 9 4.0 Producing a Digital Duplicate Negative ........................... 10 5.0 Displaying 10-bit Printing Density ................................. 12 6.0 Conversion of Printing Density to 12-bit Linear............. 13 7.0 Conversion of Printing Density to 16-bit Linear............. 15 8.0 Conversion of Printing Density to Video ......................... 19 9.0 Appendix A: What Does "Linear" Really Mean? ............... 22 10.0 Appendix B: Table of Grayscale Transformations ............ 23 Release 1.1 Notes • Appendix B is updated to correct minor errors in the calculation of 8-bit Video, 12-bit Linear, and 16-bit Linear data (columns I, J, and K). • Figures 13, 14, 15, and 17 is updated to reflect the changes in Appendix B. Version 1.1 Page 2 of 22 1.0 Introduction The conversion of image data from film-to-video and video-to-film has created challenges in the design and calibration of telecines and film recorders. The use of high resolution film scanners and recorders for digital film production also opens up a new world of computer-based imagery. The exchange of digital image data between film, television, and computer systems requires the conversion of the basic image data representa- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • KODAK MILESTONES 1879 - Eastman Invented an Emulsion-Coating Machine Which Enabled Him to Mass- Produce Photographic Dry Plates
    KODAK MILESTONES 1879 - Eastman invented an emulsion-coating machine which enabled him to mass- produce photographic dry plates. 1880 - Eastman began commercial production of dry plates in a rented loft of a building in Rochester, N.Y. 1881 - In January, Eastman and Henry A. Strong (a family friend and buggy-whip manufacturer) formed a partnership known as the Eastman Dry Plate Company. ♦ In September, Eastman quit his job as a bank clerk to devote his full time to the business. 1883 - The Eastman Dry Plate Company completed transfer of operations to a four- story building at what is now 343 State Street, Rochester, NY, the company's worldwide headquarters. 1884 - The business was changed from a partnership to a $200,000 corporation with 14 shareowners when the Eastman Dry Plate and Film Company was formed. ♦ EASTMAN Negative Paper was introduced. ♦ Eastman and William H. Walker, an associate, invented a roll holder for negative papers. 1885 - EASTMAN American Film was introduced - the first transparent photographic "film" as we know it today. ♦ The company opened a wholesale office in London, England. 1886 - George Eastman became one of the first American industrialists to employ a full- time research scientist to aid in the commercialization of a flexible, transparent film base. 1888 - The name "Kodak" was born and the KODAK camera was placed on the market, with the slogan, "You press the button - we do the rest." This was the birth of snapshot photography, as millions of amateur picture-takers know it today. 1889 - The first commercial transparent roll film, perfected by Eastman and his research chemist, was put on the market.
    [Show full text]
  • Installation and Operation Guide
    www.aja.com Published: 10/31/11 Installation and Operation Guide 1 Because it matters. 1 ii Trademarks AJA®, KONA®, Ki Pro®, KUMO®, and XENA® and are registered trademarks of AJA Video, Inc, Io Express™, Io HD™, Io™, and Because It Matters™ are trademarks of AJA Video, Inc. Apple, the Apple logo, AppleShare, AppleTalk, FireWire, iPod, iPod Touch, Mac, and Macintosh are registered trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. Final Cut Pro, QuickTime and the QuickTime Logo are trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective holders. Notice Copyright © 2011 AJA Video, Inc. All rights reserved. All information in this manual is subject to change without notice. No part of the document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, without the express written permission of AJA Inc. Contacting Support To contact AJA Video for sales or support, use any of the following methods: Telephone: 800.251.4224 or 530.271.3190 Fax: 530.274.9442 Web: http://www.aja.com Support Email: [email protected] Sales Email: [email protected] FCC Emission Information This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference when the equipment is operated in a commercial environment. This equipment generates, uses and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction manual, may cause harmful interference to radio communications.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronicle of the Motion Picture Industry a Chronicle of the Motion Picture Industry
    A CHRONICLE OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY A CHRONICLE OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INTRODUCTION If you’ve ever taken a still photograph, you’re already acquainted with the essentials of shooting a motion picture image. The biggest diMerence between the two is that the movie camera typically captures twenty-four images each second. Well into the late Nineteenth Century, most images were captured on sensitized glass plates, metal, or heavy paper. Shortly after the invention of 1951 KODAK BROWNIE photography, attempts were already underway to capture and reproduce a Movie Camera moving image. Typically, an array of individual cameras, triggered in rapid succession, captured a series of single exposures on glass plates. These experiments relied on a persistence of vision concept—the eye-brain combination is capable of melding a series of sequential images into a movie. A more practical photographic system had yet to be created. It was George Eastman’s invention of the KODAK Camera, and the flexible film it exposed, that made the movie camera possible. A HISTORY OF CINEMATOGRAPHY Human fascination with the concept of communicating with light and shadows has its roots in antiquity. Aristotle supplied the earliest reference to the camera obscura—sunlight, passing through a small hole, projected an inverted image on the wall of a darkened room. Renaissance artists traced that projected image to create accurate drawings. Gemma Frisius published a drawing of a camera obscura in 1545. Thirteen years later Giovanni Battista della Porta wrote "Magia Naturalis," a book describing the use of a camera obscura with lenses and concave mirrors to project a tableau in a darkened room.
    [Show full text]
  • Powered by Alexa Imaging Technology
    POWERED BY ALEXA IMAGING TECHNOLOGY www.arri.com/arriscanxt ARRISCAN XT POWERED BY ALEXA IMAGING TECHNOLOGY In hundreds of archives around the world reels of film, some more Developed by ZEISS in cooperation with ARRI, the ARRISCAN XT’s than a century old, lie deteriorating. ARRI’s new digitizing system, optics and the variable optical magnification system make the ARRISCAN XT, can play a key part in saving those films for sharpness-reducing digital resizing of scans unnecessary, even when future generations. scanning unusual frame dimensions or shrunken film material. It builds on the achievements of the ARRISCAN and ARRILASER, The ARRISCAN XT takes on existing, tried and tested film restoration which in recent years have set industry standards for digital technology to a new level of excellence. It is fully compatible with post production. In cooperation with film archives and restoration existing ARRISCANs, meaning restorers will be able to upgrade their specialists worldwide, ARRI has applied this range of cutting-edge equipment on-site with the addition of improved software, new technologies for digitizing and remastering old and often damaged features, and updated hardware. and fragile film. ARRI’s ALEXA XT sensor gives the new ARRISCAN XT the best image quality for archive film, and its scanning speed is up to 65% The ARRISCAN XT’s Advantages faster than its predecessor. Badly damaged material can be worked on using a computerized • Best image quality for high density archive film scanning intermitted frame-by-frame film transport system. • Unsurpassed dynamic range, sensitivity and color science The diffuse, high-power LED illumination of the ARRISCAN XT • Faster scanning speed in comparison to ARRISCAN Classic reduces the visibility of scratches and does not produce any • Full compatibility with all film gates heat at all – essential when working with highly flammable nitrate • Manually triggered single step frame-by-frame scanning film stock.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Film Material–Scanner Interaction
    Investigation of Film Material–Scanner Interaction By Barbara Flueckiger,1 David Pfluger,2 Giorgio Trumpy,3 Simone Croci,4 Tunç Aydın,5 Aljoscha Smolic6 Version 1.1. 18 February 2018 1 University of Zurich, Department of Film Studies: Project manager and principal investigator of DIASTOR (2013– 2015) and ERC Advanced Grant FilmColors (2015–2020), conducted the Kinetta (by Kinetta), ARRISCAN (by ARRI), Scanity (by DFT) and Golden Eye (by Digital Vision) tests in collaboration with the corresponding facilities, set up the general objective and procedure in collaboration with her team, contributed general information and evaluation to the report, wrote major parts of the report. 2 University of Zurich, Department of Film Studies: Senior researcher, conducted The Director (by Lasergraphics), D- Archiver Cine10-A (by RTI); Northlight 1 (by Filmlight) and Altra mk3 (by Sondor) tests, elaborated a table with an overview of all the available scanners, set up the general objective and standardization in collaboration with the team, contributed general information and evaluation to the report. 3 University of Basel, Digital Humanities Lab, under the supervision of Rudolf Gschwind and Peter Fornaro, (until 06.2014). University of Zurich, Research Scientist at ERC Advanced Grant FilmColors. Provided major parts of the section Principles of Material–Scanner Interaction, Resolving power and sharpness, and carried out the spectroscopic analysis of film stocks. 4 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Computer Graphics Lab, conducted evaluation of results. 5 Disney Research Zurich (DRZ), supervised the evaluation of the results. 6 Disney Research Zurich: Co-project manager of DIASTOR, group leader at DRZ and supervisor of evaluation of results FLUECKIGER ET AL.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion of 10-Bit Log Film Data to 8-Bit Linear Or Video Data
    cineon/dfc/imageDocs/conversions.ps Conversion of 10-bit Log Film Data To 8-bit Linear or Video Data for The Cineon Digital Film System Version 2.1 July 26, 1995 Motion Picture & Television Imaging Conversion of 10-bit Log Film Data to 8-bit Linear or Video Data 1.0 Film, Computer, and Video Images 1.1 Film Images Film has traditionally been represented by a characteristic curve which plots density vs log expo- sure. This is a log/log representation. In defining the calibration for the Cineon digital film system, Eastman Kodak Co. talked to many experts in the film industry to determine the best data metric to use for digitizing film. The consensus was to use the familier density metric and to store the film as logarithmic data. The characteristic curves for a typical motion picture color negative film are shown if Figure 1. The three curves represent the red, green, and blue color records, which are reproduced by cyan, magenta, and yellow dyes, respectively. The three curves are offset vertically because the base density of the negative film is orange in color (it contains more yellow and magenta dye than cyan dye). Figure 1. Characteristic Curves for Color Negative Film 3.0 2.5 Blue 2.0 Green Red 1.5 Density (St M) 1.0 0.5 0.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Rel Log Exp The next issue was calibration range. In order to provide as much creative freedom in the digital world as is possible in optical printing, it is necessary to digitize the full range of the original neg- ative film.
    [Show full text]
  • The Essential Reference Guide for Filmmakers
    THE ESSENTIAL REFERENCE GUIDE FOR FILMMAKERS IDEAS AND TECHNOLOGY IDEAS AND TECHNOLOGY AN INTRODUCTION TO THE ESSENTIAL REFERENCE GUIDE FOR FILMMAKERS Good films—those that e1ectively communicate the desired message—are the result of an almost magical blend of ideas and technological ingredients. And with an understanding of the tools and techniques available to the filmmaker, you can truly realize your vision. The “idea” ingredient is well documented, for beginner and professional alike. Books covering virtually all aspects of the aesthetics and mechanics of filmmaking abound—how to choose an appropriate film style, the importance of sound, how to write an e1ective film script, the basic elements of visual continuity, etc. Although equally important, becoming fluent with the technological aspects of filmmaking can be intimidating. With that in mind, we have produced this book, The Essential Reference Guide for Filmmakers. In it you will find technical information—about light meters, cameras, light, film selection, postproduction, and workflows—in an easy-to-read- and-apply format. Ours is a business that’s more than 100 years old, and from the beginning, Kodak has recognized that cinema is a form of artistic expression. Today’s cinematographers have at their disposal a variety of tools to assist them in manipulating and fine-tuning their images. And with all the changes taking place in film, digital, and hybrid technologies, you are involved with the entertainment industry at one of its most dynamic times. As you enter the exciting world of cinematography, remember that Kodak is an absolute treasure trove of information, and we are here to assist you in your journey.
    [Show full text]
  • 2K Overview Understanding 2K Workflows in Today’S Post-Production Evironments
    Whitepaper Author: Jon Thorn, Product Manager, Mac Desktop Products—AJA Video Systems 2K Overview Understanding 2K Workflows in Today’s Post-production Evironments The Image Size of 2K: Traditional Cinema and Digital Cinema 2K is a term, like SD and HD, used in today’s post-production environment to describe a particular image size and quality of data. 2K data exceeds our pre-existing television broadcast standards for both SD and HD and is therefore most commonly associated with traditional cinema and the emerging digital cinema initiative. When working with data for eventual cinematic projection, FX work or digital intermediate purposes, 2K is usually defined as 2048x1556 pixels. This size represents the “full” size of the 35mm film between the sprockets. Therefore the result, 2048x1556 pixels, appears as a 4x3 image when compared to an HD image which is typically 16x9. In 2K, other image sizes can be derived from this 2048x1556 source by taking a cropped portion of the image for use. For a traditional cinematic projection scenario, the final delivery of this 2048x1556 data is onto 35mm film. The film undergoes photochemical and mechanical processes before the image reaches the screen. The other common size attributed to 2K is 2048x1080; this is the standard to which digital cinema currently adheres. Most digital cinema projectors have this 2048x1080 image size as a supported resolution and in many cases, as a maximum resolution. Here the data at 2048x1080 need not undergo a photochemical process; it can stay data for its path to projection. So the first obvious advantage of working with 2K images as opposed to HD is the size of the image that can be generated, manipulated, and ultimately projected.
    [Show full text]