The Immanent Potential of Economic and Monetary Integration: a Critical Reading of the Eurozone Crisis Peter J
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Habermas and the Project of Immanent Critique Titus Stahl
This is the pre-review version of an article manuscript eventually published in Constellations (at the moment only in online-first)]. The intellectual property arrangement of the publisher Wiley makes it impossible for me to put the article as published online for public access. The article has changed considerably as compared to this version and contains many improvements suggested by the reviewers. If you quote, please refer to the published article. Subscribers of Constellations can access the article under: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12057 If you have any questions, please e-mail me at [email protected] or [email protected] Habermas and the Project of Immanent Critique Titus Stahl According to his own understanding, Jürgen Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action offers a new account of the normative foundations of critical theory.1 Habermas’ motivating insight is that neither a transcendental or metaphysical solution to the problem of normativity, nor a merely hermeneutic reconstruction of historically given norms, is sufficient to clarify the normative foundations of critical theory. In response to this insight, Habermas develops a novel account of normativity which locates the normative demands upon which critical theory draws within the socially instituted practice of communicative understanding. Although Habermas has claimed otherwise, this new foundation for critical theory constitutes a novel and innovative form of “immanent critique”. To argue for and to clarify this claim, I offer, in section 1, a formal account of immanent critique and distinguish between two different ways of carrying out such a critique. In section 2, I examine Habermas’ rejection of the first, hermeneutic option. -
FREDERIC JAMESON. NARRATIVE AS a SOCIALLY SYMBOLIC ACT.Pdf
The Political Unconscious NARRATIVE AS A SOCIALLY SYMBOLIC ACT FREDRIC JAMESON BY THE SAME AUTHOR: Fables of Aggression: Wyndham Lewis, The Modernist as Fascist The Prison-House of Language Marxism and Form Sartre: The Origins of a Style Cornell University Press ITHACA, NEW YORK Copyright © 1981 by Cornell University Press All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 1981 by Cornell University Press. Second printing, 1982. First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 1982. Seventh printing 1994. Printed in the United States of America © The paper in this book meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data O ma belle guerriere! CONTENTS Early versions of Chapters 2, 3, and 4 appeared in New Literary History, Sub-stance, Social Science Information, and Nineteenth Century Fiction. PREFACE ON INTERPRETATION: Literature as a Socially Symbolic Act MAGICAL NARRATIVES: On the Dialectical Use of Genre Criticism REALISM AND DESIRE: Balzac and the Problem of the Subject AUTHENTIC RESSENTIMENT: Generic Discontinuities and Ideologemes in the "Experimental" Novels of George Gissing ROMANCE AND REIFICATION: Plot Construction and Ideological Closure in Joseph Conrad CONCLUSION: The Dialectic of Utopia and Ideology INDEX To imagine a language means to imagine a form of life. —Wittgenstein Since the world expressed by the total system of concepts is the world as society represents it to itself, only society can furnish the generalized notions according to which such a world must be represented. -
Totality and Global Culture Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
Nutshells and Infinite Space: Totality and Global Culture Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Oded Nir, MA Graduate Program in Comparative Studies The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Philip Armstrong, Advisor Leo Coleman Ethan Knapp Fredric Jameson Copyright by Oded Nir 2014 Abstract In my dissertation, “Nutshells and Infinite Space: Totality and Global Culture,” I reformulate the Marxist concept of totality in response to the economic and cultural transformations brought about by globalization. The dissertation is divided into three parts. In the first part, I trace the lineage of Marxist thinking about totality through the writing of Marx, Lukács, Adorno, and Jameson. Through addressing critiques of totality, I develop a conception of immanent totality that reconciles Hegelian Marxist thinking on totality with the critiques of the concept elaborated by Spinozist Marxism, Lyotard, and others. In the second part of the dissertation, I argue that attempts to theorize globalization from the late 1980s until the early 2000s (in the work of Ronald Robertson, Arjun Appadurai, Leslie Sklair, Kenichi Ohmae, Ulrich Beck and others) constitute an unconscious search for a subject of history, or for a universal agent that can exert control over globalization. This unconscious search is conducted in globalization theory’s attempt to relate systematic changes brought about by globalization to the subjective experience conditioned by such changes. I argue that in a first moment, globalization theories attempt to construct new discursive contradictions in order to describe their new phenomena. In a second moment, these contradictions tend to collapse, marking the failure of the search for a subject of history. -
Critical Habits: Ideology, Immanent Critique and Second Nature
Critical Habits: Ideology, immanent critique and second nature Honors thesis written by Emma M. Young, 5630681 Utrecht University, Faculty of Humanities Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Philosophy Submitted on 14-06-2019 First Supervisor dr. Jesse M. Mulder Second Supervisor dr. Joel H. Anderson Summary In this thesis, I define a conception of anthropology based on habits that proves suitable to figure in a theory of ideology critique. In the first part, I reconstruct neo-Hegelian theories of ideology and immanent critique to articulate a challenge for Karen Ng’s dialectical theory of ideology critique. To answer this challenge in the second part of this thesis, I adapt Ng’s theory by supplementing it with Hegelian anthropology and contemporary work on self-consciousness. Drawing on a conception of habits provided by Sebastian Rödl, I define a threefold structure that provides us with the positive side of habits in their constitutive role in self-consciousness. Given the negative role of habits in the Hegelian conception of historical change, I am able to explain how habits exist on a societal level and how habits may become stagnant and oppose change. This leads to the contradictory character of habits that illustrates how habits could form both an oppressive and a liberating force. As such, I arrive at a theory of ideology critique with habits as its object and its ground. 2 Contents Introduction: Reason’s Reflexivity............................................................................................... 4 Part I. The Ground for Immanent Critique ................................................................................. 6 1. Ideology Critique and Immanent Critique ............................................................................ 6 1.1 Immanent Critique ......................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Critical Naturalist Anthropology .................................................................................