DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Maps and Appendices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BYLAW 99/059 - MAP 1 RANGE 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Leland 126 Lakes Andrew Lake Fitzgerald Charles 125 Lake Potts 124 Lake 123 Cornwall Lake Colin 122 Lake 121 120 Wylie Lake 119 118 117 RURAL 116 Wood Buffalo DISTRICT 115 a National Park e c k s a a L b 114 a th A 113 Fort 112 Chipewyan 111 110 109 Richardson Lake 108 107 106 105 P 104 I 104 H 103 S 103 N W P I 102 O H 102 T S 101 N RURAL 101 W 100 O 100 T DISTRICT 99 Big Island Lake 99 98 Gardiner 24 23 22 21 20 Lakes McClelland 98 Lake 97 Legend Namur Lake Lake 97 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 96 95 APPENDIX A Fort McKay RURAL 94 DISTRICT MAP 1 - Key Plan ¤£63 93 # 92 MAP 2 - Fitzgerald See Map 6 91 Fort MAP 3 - Fort Chipewyan 90 686 McMurray Cle ¤£ arw ate Rive r Saprae r 89 MAP 4 - Fort Chipewyan (Detailed) e r Riv Creek a 88 as c Estates MAP 5 - Fort McKay Ath ab Gregoire Gordon 87 MAP 6 - Fort McMurray (Fringe) Lake Estates Lake Willow Anzac Gipsy 86 Lake Lake Birch Lake Garson MAP 7 & 8 - Fort McMurray Lake 85 RURAL 63 LA LOCHE WINTER TRAIL MAP 9 - Saprae Creek Estates ¤£ 84 DISTRICT 83 MAP 10 - Airport Lands 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 82 881 MAP 11 - Gregoire Lake Estates Mariana Lake ¤£ 81 80 MAP 12 - Anzac 4 k Janvier 79 MAP 13 - Janvier South 78 MAP 14 - Conklin 77 Christina Conklin MAP 15 - Mariana Lake Lake 76 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 * See Schedule "A" For Land Use District RANGE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO ± LAND USE DISTRICTS Februray 16, 2018 Map 1 Key Plan LAND USE DISTRICTS RURAL SERVICE AREA BI Business Industrial NW17 112-7-4 PS Public Service HR Hamlet Residential BI R UE Urban Expansion P HC Hamlet Commercial CR Country Residential PR Parks and Recreation UE R P K E E R C N IO SW17 112-7-4 S IS M SE18 112-7-4 PR PS PS UE NE7 112-7-4 BI PS PR PS HR B HR Y CR L HC PS A HC W PR 9 9 / # 0 5 HR 9 PS PS HR - BI PR FORT CHIPEWYAN ´ M A LAKE ATHABASCA P LAND USE DISTRICTS 4 January 10, 2018 BYLAW 99/059 - MAP 5 FORT MCKAY INDIAN FORT MCKAY INDIAN RESERVE NO. 174D RESERVE NO. 174D SW35 94-11-4 HAMLET BOUNDARY NW26 94-11-4 FORT MCKAY 174 FORT FORT MCKAY 174 MCKAY 174 SW26 94-11-4 r FORT e v MCKAY i R 174 a c s a b a h HG t A NW23 94-11-4 H AM LE T BO Ma UN FORT cK D a A MCKAY 174 y RY R iv er D A O SW23 94-11-4 R Y A K C A M T R SE23 94-11-4 O LAND USE DISTRICTS F FORFORTT MCKAY ´ RURAL SERVICE AREA MCKAY 174 HG Hamlet General LAND USE DISTRICTS February 16, 2018 Map 5 - Fort McKay BYLAW 99/059 - MAP 6 11 10 Range 9 8 FORT McMURRAY S te ep b a # n k 92 R FRINGE AREA i 92 ve SI r A LAND USE DISTRICTS t h a RD b a s c LAND USE DISTRICTS - a R i v e RURAL SERVICE AREA r 91 91 RD Rural_District 10l RD UE Urban Expansion p i p i h SI Support Industrial h s 9 s n l n w w C3 Shopping Centre Commercial o o T T PS Public Service ¤£63 # PR PR Parks and Recreation 90 BI Business Industrial 90 UE 5l 8l # C3 ´ March 8, 2016 8 Range 7 2 FORT UE 8 l MCMURRAY 89 89 RD See Map 10 RD 1 NOTE: # Lands within this l area also regulated by the provisions Clearw ater R of the Fort 7 iver UE SAPRAE McMurray Airport r e iv CREEK CLEARWATER Vicinity Protection R a INDIAN c ESTATES Area (AVPA) s 88 a r C RESERVE b e h Regulation. a v AIRPORT ri 175 h i l R st t R in A e 7 L a s W R r £69 Y iv o ¤ - e H S r G r L e -T iv R R A 88 e C n K to s g in g p n i a 11 10 H h Range s n w o RD T 87 87 p i 6 h l s BI # 881 n ¤£ w o T RD PS 86 176B GREGOIRE 86 A LAKE ESTATES N Willow Z 176A A Lake C GREGOIRE LAKE 881 ¤£63 INDIAN RESERVE ¤£ 176 85 85 9 8 7 Range See Schedule "A" For Land Use District Lub-Fringe BYLAW 99/059 - MAP 7 & 8 PR UE ± ND UE MFD ND MDD PR PR PS ND D TC UE 686 D D ¤£ M PR N O R T H WD P A PR R S PR O PR N PR S CD ND WD G T W M Y DD D ND D D S M M PR PS PR BI ND D P P MF R S ND R3 N DC D 1 C4 TWP 90 RGE 9 R R 1 S PS R 1 R2 S 1 R 1 1 R -1 2 R P 2 - R R R 1 R R S M P H 1 1S - R R 1 R R R PR P 1 PS M P R TWP 89 RGE 9 H 2 R - 1 PR 1 R 1 R 1 R I 2 R B 3 -1 R1 2 R R -1 P S R H PR 1 M R EP 3 R R 1 3 R 1 R R R2 S S R1S R1S 1 R R1 2 PR R P H R R3 M R3 BI R 3 - R C R 1 PS PS S D R1S 3 PR C3 R A R3 PS PR C3 A RM 3 R3 H UE C -1 R2-1 R3 R3 C3A PS C3 2 2 3 S C AY R W R5 R DC 1 N R3 R 3 O R R TI 2 1S A R R R E R R PR R2 C3 R5 2 E U 1 P D E R2 C1 3 F R R R 1S EP N 2 R R5-MU R R O 1S P 3 C PR 1 B R R I P 1 2 PR R R UE 1 E PS R 2E 1 R P R R 1 1 DC P R2 PR R PR R H R PR 1 2 S PR R M R S 1 2 R R1 R 1 R3 R PR 1 R3 P R 1 PS PS R R1 UE H 1 E M 2 R 1 R R R 2 UE R 1 R2 R 1 R EP EP R S 1 EP S 1 R R S R r R R1 1 2 EP R 2 P e P R 2 S 3 R v i C S EP 1 1 UE PS R R1 R R R3 D C a PR PR 2 D DC l PS R c L -M e 2 I R R1 A s a R1 N 2 r R2 a O R1S R R w 3 D 1 R 2 b R H 2 C3 C a R PR M R a A t 2 e R 3 M R S h r D P t R 2 1 P 2 R P LV S R C S 2 R R1 S B P A PS D C OOD The i CKW C Sn v PS PR THI 2 PS ye R D e S R r 1 PR 1S R3 R 1 1 PS C3 T 3 C S R 1 R N R R1E O IS C R 1 1 3 S R R P 2 R2 R EP R R3 O PS M T S S R P PR 1 R N 1 I E R 1 D E DC R R PR 1 A E P H P S S R1 P R1 PS 1 R3 R1 C R1S F T R S R2 AN R2 K L R1 PS L E IN D A E R1 1 V I R R EP E R 2 PR 2 C R EP D D R 1 1 1 C R R M T A S N C L N LE A IN A T G R I W EP P AV A R3 S E TE PR O R H R D 2 R R1 A T B R S AS 1 A G 3 N R D IN D K D R C -R 4 C 2 D C R1 P PS S 2 R R P D 2 C R PS R1S C2 3 R 3 L R R1S 2 B C L -R PS 4 P E RMH TO LE N D EP R P R D C C C D 1 R 1 S C R 1 C P 2 P R 1 S M D R1 R C P 2 S R EP 1 P R S A B L E IN A E C C O R S E P N PS E H K I P L K 1 L Y C D D R3 R C R EP -U 1 E H R M R R 2 EP C4 UE TWP 89 RGE 10 C4 PS R P P TWP 88 RGE 10 R S 3 G R E RMH-2 G 3 O PR S C D I RA P R PER E RD D R C4 PS P DC R PS M A C K BI E N Z GD IE B L BI V D UE P S PS BI R1 R UE R 3 1 5 R S - I M C4 B U R1S PR R3 P S R1 BI 3 SNOW EAGL R E DR - UE C D 3 R RMH R1S A BI S N O W BIRD WAY UE ¤£63 PR RD BI 0 650 1,300 BI PR Metres 1:37,000 LAND USE DISTRICTS RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL MIXED USE AIRPORT CR Country Residential C1 Community Commercial CD Civic District A Airport MFD Multi Family District C2 Mixed/Transitional Commercial LBL-R4 Longboat Landing District INDUSTRIAL ND Neighbourhood District C3 Shopping Centre Commercial MDD Mixed Development District BI Business Industrial R1 Single Detached Residential C3A Timberlea Shopping Centre Commercial MSD Main Street District R1E Single Family Estate Residential C4 Highway Commercial R3 Medium Density Residential INSTITUTIONAL R1M Mixed Form Single Detached Residential GD Gateway District R5 High Density Residential PS Public Service R1P Planned Unit Residential R5-MU Apartment and Commercial Mixed Use District DIRECT CONTROL R1S Single Fmaily Small Lot Residential TCD Town Centre District RURAL DC Direct Control R2 Low Density Residential WD Waterfront District RD Rural Development R2-1 Modified Medium Density Residential DC-MI Direct Control MacDonald Island RMH Manufactured Home Residential DC-R3 Direct Control Medium Density Residential OPEN SPACE - PARKS & RECREATION BYLAW 16/020 RMH-1 Modified Manufactured Home DC-R4 Direct Control High Density Residential EP Envirnomental Preservation Wildfire Recovery Overlay RMH-2 Small Zero Lot Line Manufactured Home DC-RMH Direct Control Manufactured Home PR Parks and Recreation CITY CENTRE LUB DC-UER Direct Control Urban Estate Residential UE Urban Expansion See Bylaw 12_012 City Centre Districts Map Produced for the Community FORT MCMURRAY LAND USE DISTRICTS Development Planning Branch 5 Jul 2018 SE34 88-8-4 SW35 88-8-4 SE35 88-8-4 SW36 88-8-4 SE36 88-8-4 SW31 88-7-4 NE27 88-8-4 NE26 88-8-4 NE25 88-8-4 NW26 88-8-4 NW25 88-8-4 NW30 88-7-4 PR SAPR AE CRESCENT SE FREE STONE WAY PR SE25 88-8-4 SAPR AE CR ESCE N E T COMMU V NITY PR I LANE R D K SE27 88-8-4 R A P L SW30 88-7-4 O S EP PR EP WEISS DRIVE J AN KE LANE SE SE S E O V NE24 88-8-4 MME I R R WA NE22 88-8-4 NW23 88-8-4 Y D NW19 88-7-4 Y S E AP NE23 88-8-4 L R L AE C A R V EE K NW24 88-8-4 E C U R P S SE22 88-8-4 SE23 88-8-4 SE24 88-8-4 B Y SW23 88-8-4 SW24 88-8-4 SW19 88-7-4 L A W 9 9 LAND USE DISTRICTS / 0 RURAL SERVICE AREA SAPRAE CREEK ´ 5 9 EP Environmental Preservation - PR Parks and Recreation LAND USE DISTRICTS M A SAP P RAE CR SE Suburban Estate Residential EEK T March 10, 2016 RAIL 9 BYLAW 99/059 - MAP 10 C r ve le i R a R ain rw ater b ow Cree k 9 8 8 7 E E E E G G G G R R R R RD 9 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 EP P P P P W W W W T S T T a T l i n e C SH r e e k TWP 89 RGE 9 TWP 89 RGE 8 C TWP 89 RGE 7 TWP 88 RGE 9 l e TWP 88 RGE 8 TWP 88 RGE 7 a r w a t e SH r R iv e r UE CR RD CR UE R1 PS PR R3 R1 C4 PR R3 SE PR 9 8 E E BI 8 7 G G E E R R EP G G 8 8 PR R R 8 8 8 8 P P S EP a 8 8 p W W r a P P T T e C SE reek W W A T T BI BI ¤£63 RD UE UE RD P r a i r i e C4 BI C BI r e e k BIU Land Use Districts - Rural Service Area A Airport C4 Highway Commercial GD Gateway District R2 Low Density Residential SE Suburban Estate Residential BI Business Industrial CR Country Residential PR Parks and Recreation R3 Medium Density Residential SH Small Holdings AIRPORT LANDS BIU Business Industrial Unserviced DC Direct Control PS Public Service R5-MU Apartment & Commercial Mixed Use UE Urban Expansion 1 cm = 380 meters C1 Community Commercial DC-R3 Direct Control Medium Density Residentail R1 Single Detached Residential RD Rural District LAND USE DISTRICTS ± December 08, 2017 C2 Mixed/Transitional Commercial DC-UER Direct Control Urban Estate Reidential R1M Mixed Form Single Detached Residential RMH Manufactured Home Residential Amendment Date: November 25, 2014 Map produced for C3 Shopping Center Commercial EP Environmental Protection R1S Single Family Small Lot Residential RMH-2 Small zero lot line Manufactured Home Community Development Branch BYLAW 99/059 - MAP 12 NW16 86-7-4 S A L e a n w z g a a E o Canoe Lake g c V o I n
Recommended publications
  • Halifax Regional Municipality Settlement Pattern and Form with Service Cost Analysis

    Halifax Regional Municipality Settlement Pattern and Form with Service Cost Analysis

    Regional Planning – Halifax Regional Municipality Settlement Pattern and Form with Service Cost Analysis April 2005 Table of Contents Introduction 2 Summary 3 Methodology Residential Patterns 10 Residential Patterns 11 Summary Table 12 Pattern A – Rural – 2+ Acre Lots 13 Pattern B – Rural – 1+ Acre Lots 14 Pattern C – Suburban Low Density 15 Pattern D – Urban Low Density 16 Pattern E – Suburban Mid Density 17 Pattern F – Urban Mid Density 18 Pattern G – Urban High Density 19 Pattern H – Rural Cluster Appendices and Conclusion 20 Appendix A – Pattern Attributes 21 Appendix B – Unit Costs of Services 22 Appendix C – Summary of Estimated Costs 24 Conclusion | 1 Regional Planning – Halifax Regional Municipality Introduction Summary Halifax Regional Municipality is in the process of developing a 25-year Regional Plan and is proposing specific policies on how and where it should grow. In a sense, one might think of HRM as a growing "family" looking at options for its future "home". And when looking for a new home, it is important to know that the one you're looking at, or thinking of building, is affordable. HRM's Cost of Servicing study allows us to better understand the cost implications of different patterns of growth. This booklet will show the findings of the Cost of Servicing study applied to sample settlement patterns that are typical to HRM. Although, not all of the factors influencing costs, such as the effects of specific locations, have been included, trends are emerg- ing that should support discussions of the relative, incremental costs of the different styles of "rooms" (neigh- bourhoods) that make up HRM's "home".
  • Corporate Registry Registrar's Periodical Template

    Corporate Registry Registrar's Periodical Template

    Service Alberta ____________________ Corporate Registry ____________________ Registrar’s Periodical SERVICE ALBERTA Corporate Registrations, Incorporations, and Continuations (Business Corporations Act, Cemetery Companies Act, Companies Act, Cooperatives Act, Credit Union Act, Loan and Trust Corporations Act, Religious Societies’ Land Act, Rural Utilities Act, Societies Act, Partnership Act) 101225945 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. Other 10978477 CANADA LTD. Federal Corporation Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2018 SEP 06 Registered Registered 2018 SEP 06 Registered Address: 2865 Address: 5009 - 47 STREET PO BOX 20 STN MAIN MADLE WAY NORTH WEST, EDMONTON (27419-1 TRK), LLOYDMINSTER ALBERTA, T6T 0W8. No: 2121414144. SASKATCHEWAN, S9V 0X9. No: 2121414847. 1133703 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps 101259911 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. Other Registered 2018 SEP 05 Registered Address: 103, 201-2 Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2018 SEP 11 Registered STREET NE, SLAVE LAKE ALBERTA, T0G2A2. No: Address: 3315 11TH AVE NW, EDMONTON 2121411470. ALBERTA, T6T 2C5. No: 2121423640. 1178223 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps 101289693 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. Other Registered 2018 SEP 04 Registered Address: 114-35 Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2018 SEP 04 Registered INGLEWOOD PARK SE, CALGARY ALBERTA, Address: 410, 316 WINDERMERE ROAD NW, T2G1B5. No: 2121411033. EDMONTON ALBERTA, T6W 2Z8. No: 2121411199. 1178402 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps 102058691 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. Other Registered 2018 SEP 06 Registered Address: 1101-3961 Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2018 SEP 06 Registered 52ND AVENUE NE, CALGARY ALBERTA, T3J0J7. Address: 5016 LAC STE. ANNE TRAIL SOUTH PO No: 2121414698. BOX 885, ONOWAY ALBERTA, T0E 1V0. No: 2121414276. 1179276 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2018 SEP 13 Registered Address: SUITE 102059279 SASKATCHEWAN LTD.
  • City-County Consolidation in St. Louis: an Analysis

    City-County Consolidation in St. Louis: an Analysis

    Missouri Policy Journal | Number 8 (Spring/Summer 2019) | 35 City-County Consolidation in St. Louis: An Analysis United States over the past fifty years. These consol- Joshua Hall, PhD idation attempts, and the findings of the scholars that West Virginia University have studied them, can give policymakers some in- Josh Matti, PhD Candidate sight into opportunities for improvement in regional governance and potential pitfalls to avoid. As authors West Virginia University of two recent papers on city-county consolidation, we employ our understanding of the literature, combined 1. Introduction with our own original research, to provide citizens and policymakers of St. Louis County with insights The county of St. Louis is one of the most politically and lessons from the academic literature on city- fragmented in the United States. According to Better county consolidation. Together,1 a group in favor of municipal reform in St. Louis County, the county contains ninety municipal We proceed as follows. We begin by summarizing the governments, fifty-seven police departments, eighty- theoretical arguments in favor of consolidation in one municipal courts, and forty-three fire districts. Section 2, followed by the theoretical arguments This political fragmentation has been argued to lead against consolidation in Section 3. Where possible we to a number of problems, including wasteful compe- try to link discussion from the academic literature to tition among local governments, inefficient duplica- arguments made regarding the situation in St. Louis. tion of services, an inability to coordinate efforts Section 4 discusses the empirical literature on city- geared towards regional growth, and a disparity in county consolidation.
  • Air Quality Monitoring

    Air Quality Monitoring

    Proposed Southern Air Monitoring Plan - Next Steps Southern Air Monitoring Plan Operations and Data Management If the Southern Air Monitoring Plan is approved for funding by AEMERA in 2015/16, WBEA members propose Data generated by the proposed Southern Air Monitoring validated data are available within four weeks after the to phase in implementation of the plan over the next six years. Some of the milestones would include: Plan would become part of WBEA’s existing data and month in which they were collected. The validated data are information management system which has been then provided to stakeholders, regulators and the public Wood Buffalo Environmental Association developed over the last 16 years to meet user data and to ensure that accurate information is available to support operational needs, as well as regulatory requirements. informed decision making. Air Quality Monitoring Generating timely, accurate, accessible, high-quality data is • Prepare a draft work plan for implementation of the Southern Air a fundamental principle of WBEA’s monitoring programs. The following figure illustrates the flow of information from Monitoring Plan. WBEA monitoring stations to various data repositories. • Complete monitoring site construction and commission the Conklin Enhanced WBEA has developed a leading-edge Data Management WBEA data arising from environmental monitoring Deposition Station (AMS 18), in support of JOSM. System (DMS) which ensures that data are transmitted in activities undertaken in support of the Southern Air near real-time to the WBEA website and that raw data are Monitoring Plan will also be available for all the purposes • Deploy WBEA portable air monitoring stations to Conklin and Janvier until A Proposed Ambient Air Monitoring Plan for the Southern validated and archived for future analysis.
  • Housing Needs Assessment | Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo

    Housing Needs Assessment | Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo

    WOOD BUFFALO HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT Wood Buffalo Regional Report Prepared by: Urban Matters CCC 2nd Floor, 9902 Franklin Avenue Fort McMurray, AB T9H 2K5 P: (780) 430-4041 May 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES ..................................................................................................3 TABLES ....................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................1 KEY FINDINGS ..........................................................................................6 COMMUNITY HOUSING PROFILE .............................................................8 Demographics .........................................................................................8 Current Population .........................................................................9 Age and Gender Profile ..................................................................9 Ethnic and Cultural Identity ..........................................................10 Households ...........................................................................................11 Household Type ...........................................................................11 Household Tenure ........................................................................12 Economy ...............................................................................................12 Income .........................................................................................12
  • Specialized and Rural Municipalities and Their Communities

    Specialized and Rural Municipalities and Their Communities

    Specialized and Rural Municipalities and Their Communities Updated December 18, 2020 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPALITIES AND THEIR COMMUNITIES MUNICIPALITY COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY STATUS SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITES Crowsnest Pass, Municipality of None Jasper, Municipality of None Lac La Biche County Beaver Lake Hamlet Hylo Hamlet Lac La Biche Hamlet Plamondon Hamlet Venice Hamlet Mackenzie County HIGH LEVEL Town RAINBOW LAKE Town Fort Vermilion Hamlet La Crete Hamlet Zama City Hamlet Strathcona County Antler Lake Hamlet Ardrossan Hamlet Collingwood Cove Hamlet Half Moon Lake Hamlet Hastings Lake Hamlet Josephburg Hamlet North Cooking Lake Hamlet Sherwood Park Hamlet South Cooking Lake Hamlet Wood Buffalo, Regional Municipality of Anzac Hamlet Conklin Hamlet Fort Chipewyan Hamlet Fort MacKay Hamlet Fort McMurray Hamlet December 18, 2020 Page 1 of 25 Gregoire Lake Estates Hamlet Janvier South Hamlet Saprae Creek Hamlet December 18, 2020 Page 2 of 25 MUNICIPALITY COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS Acadia No. 34, M.D. of Acadia Valley Hamlet Athabasca County ATHABASCA Town BOYLE Village BONDISS Summer Village ISLAND LAKE SOUTH Summer Village ISLAND LAKE Summer Village MEWATHA BEACH Summer Village SOUTH BAPTISTE Summer Village SUNSET BEACH Summer Village WEST BAPTISTE Summer Village WHISPERING HILLS Summer Village Atmore Hamlet Breynat Hamlet Caslan Hamlet Colinton Hamlet
  • Municipalities in Alberta Types of Municipalities and Other Local Authorities

    Municipalities in Alberta Types of Municipalities and Other Local Authorities

    Learn About Municipal Government Municipalities in Alberta Types of municipalities and other local authorities Towns Types of Municipal Governments A town can be formed with a minimum population of in Alberta 1,000 people and may exceed 10,000 people unless a request to change to city status is made. Under Alberta is governed through three general types of the MGA, a town is governed by a seven-member municipalities: urban, rural and specialized. Urban council. However, a local bylaw can change the municipalities are summer villages, villages, towns, number of council members to be higher or lower, as and cities. Rural municipalities include counties and long as that number is no lower than three and municipal districts. Specialized municipalities can remains at an odd number. The chief elected official include both rural and urban communities. for a town is the mayor. Key Terms Villages Mayor: the title given to the person elected as the head or chair of the municipal council. Also called A village may be formed in an area where the the chief elected official. Generally used in urban majority of buildings are on parcels of land smaller municipalities, but is used by some rural than 1,850 square meters and there is a population municipalities. of at least 300 people. A village may apply for town Reeve: the title given to the person elected as the status when the population reaches 1,000; it does head or chair of the municipal council. Also called not lose its village status if the population declines the chief elected official.
  • Planning for Sea-Level Rise in Halifax Harbour Adaptation Measures Can Be Incrementally Adjusted As New Information Becomes Available

    Planning for Sea-Level Rise in Halifax Harbour Adaptation Measures Can Be Incrementally Adjusted As New Information Becomes Available

    i t y i fa x a l P a l h ional Munici eg r Photo courtesy of Planning for sea-level rise in halifax harbour Adaptation measures can be incrementally adjusted as new information becomes available Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM), the capital of Nova Scotia, is Atlantic Canada’s largest city. The municipality covers more than 5500 km2 and has a population of more than 390 000. Halifax Harbour, at the heart of HRM, is a major seaport with significant industrial, military and municipal infrastructure. Rising sea level, along with increased storm intensity and associated waves and storm surges, presents risks to damaging storms residents, property and infrastructure in coastal areas of In recent years, Halifax has experienced frequent extreme HRM. Following extreme weather events in September weather, including several major storms that caused 2003 and February 2004, HRM launched ClimateSMART extensive erosion and flood damage. Most notable was (Sustainable Mitigation & Adaptation Risk Toolkit) to help Hurricane Juan in September 2003, a “once-in-a-century” mainstream climate change mitigation and adaptation into event. This Category 2 hurricane made landfall just west municipal planning and decision making. ClimateSMART of Halifax and tracked across central Nova Scotia and initiated discussion of climate change and spurred further Prince Edward Island, leaving a trail of damage to property, adaptation action. infrastructure and the environment (cost estimated at In August 2006, the HRM Council adopted the Regional $200 million). A few months later, in February 2004, the Municipal Planning Strategy, an integrated land use severe winter blizzard that became known as “White Juan” planning guide for future development.
  • York Region Official Plan 2010

    York Region Official Plan 2010

    The Regional Municipality of York Official Plan 2019 Office Consolidation April 2019 Modified York Region Official Plan - 2010 York Region Official Plan - Office Consolidation: January 2019 York Region Official Plan Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Introduction 1 1.1 A Snapshot of the Region 1 1.2 Towards a Sustainable Region 2 1.3 The Provincial Context 3 1.4 Purpose and Organization 5 Chapter 2 - A Sustainable Natural Environment 11 2.1 Regional Greenlands System: A Sustainable Natural Environment Legacy 12 2.2 Natural Features: Components of the Greenlands System 18 • Key Natural Heritage Features and Key Hydrologic Features 19 • Oak Ridges Moraine, Greenbelt and Lake Simcoe Watershed Features 21 • Species at Risk and their Habitats 25 • Wetlands 26 • Woodlands 28 • Landform Conservation 32 2.3 Water Systems 33 • Lake Simcoe Protection Plan 36 • Natural Hazards 37 • Watershed Planning 39 • Stormwater Management 40 Chapter 3 - Healthy Communities 43 3.1 Human Health and Well-Being 43 3.2 Air Quality and Climate Change 45 3.3 Provision of Human Services 47 3.4 Cultural Heritage 49 • Archaeological Resources 51 3.5 Housing Our Residents 54 Chapter 4 - Economic Vitality 61 4.1 Supporting the York Region Economic Strategy 62 4.2 City Building 64 4.3 Planning for Employment Lands 65 4.4 Planning for Retail 67 4.5 Financial Management 69 York Region Official Plan - Office Consolidation: January 2019 | i York Region Official Plan Table of Contents Chapter 5 - An Urbanizing Region: Building Cities and Complete Communities 73 5.1 Forecasting and
  • Reassessing Local Government Amalgamation Quebec’S Liberal Government Establishes Process for Municipal Demerger

    Reassessing Local Government Amalgamation Quebec’S Liberal Government Establishes Process for Municipal Demerger

    (FB022) FEBRUARY 2003 Reassessing Local Government Amalgamation Quebec’s Liberal Government Establishes Process for Municipal Demerger Executive Summary · Provincial governments in Canada have actively promoted municipal amalgamations with the claim that overall costs per capita for taxpayers are lower with larger urban government units. · An analysis of US Census data indicates the reverse, that higher expenditures per capita are generally associated with larger municipal units and that consolidated governments are more costly than governments typified by multiple government units. · Many of the world’s largest and most successful urban areas have numerous local government units. For example, the Paris area has more than 1,300 municipal governments and the Tokyo area has more than 225. If there is one idea that politicians of every stripe seem to agree upon, it is that bigger municipal governments are better than smaller ones. But there is good reason to be suspicious of this consensus. In the late 1990s, Ontario’s Progressive Conservative government, headed by Premier Mike Harris, decided it was time to put an end to what it perceived as the duplication of services and excess expenses of the six municipalities that operated within the regional Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. They hatched studies proving that a “megacity” Toronto would save taxpayers money, while providing them better services. The Harris government claimed, to make its point, that instead of having six fire chiefs in the existing six jurisdictions, there would only be one. Opponents countered that there would be seven, the six original fire chiefs plus a “super chief.” People who understood the dynamics of employee relations and inconsistent labor contracts knew that work arrangements and pay scales would “migrate” to the highest level.
  • 2017 Municipal Codes

    2017 Municipal Codes

    2017 Municipal Codes Updated December 22, 2017 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] 2017 MUNICIPAL CHANGES STATUS CHANGES: 0315 - The Village of Thorsby became the Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017). NAME CHANGES: 0315- The Town of Thorsby (effective January 1, 2017) from Village of Thorsby. AMALGAMATED: FORMATIONS: DISSOLVED: 0038 –The Village of Botha dissolved and became part of the County of Stettler (effective September 1, 2017). 0352 –The Village of Willingdon dissolved and became part of the County of Two Hills (effective September 1, 2017). CODE NUMBERS RESERVED: 4737 Capital Region Board 0522 Metis Settlements General Council 0524 R.M. of Brittania (Sask.) 0462 Townsite of Redwood Meadows 5284 Calgary Regional Partnership STATUS CODES: 01 Cities (18)* 15 Hamlet & Urban Services Areas (396) 09 Specialized Municipalities (5) 20 Services Commissions (71) 06 Municipal Districts (64) 25 First Nations (52) 02 Towns (108) 26 Indian Reserves (138) 03 Villages (87) 50 Local Government Associations (22) 04 Summer Villages (51) 60 Emergency Districts (12) 07 Improvement Districts (8) 98 Reserved Codes (5) 08 Special Areas (3) 11 Metis Settlements (8) * (Includes Lloydminster) December 22, 2017 Page 1 of 13 CITIES CODE CITIES CODE NO. NO. Airdrie 0003 Brooks 0043 Calgary 0046 Camrose 0048 Chestermere 0356 Cold Lake 0525 Edmonton 0098 Fort Saskatchewan 0117 Grande Prairie 0132 Lacombe 0194 Leduc 0200 Lethbridge 0203 Lloydminster* 0206 Medicine Hat 0217 Red Deer 0262 Spruce Grove 0291 St. Albert 0292 Wetaskiwin 0347 *Alberta only SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE NO.
  • Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities (May 2019)

    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities (May 2019)

    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated May 24, 2019 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Foothills County Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 Beaverdam Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No.