String Theory Limits and Dualities Voor Heit En Mem

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

String Theory Limits and Dualities Voor Heit En Mem String Theory Limits and Dualities Voor Heit en Mem. Omslagillustratie : bewerkte foto van de passage van boei nummer D24 tijdens een zeiltocht naar het Waddeneiland Texel, augustus 1999. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen STRING THEORY LIMITS AND DUALITIES PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van het doctoraat in de Wiskunde en Natuurwetenschappen aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, Dr. D.F.J. Bosscher, in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 30 juni 2000 om 14.15 uur door Jan Pieter van der Schaar geboren op 28 december 1972 te Heerenveen Promotor: Prof. Dr. D. Atkinson Referenten: Dr. E.A. Bergshoeff Dr. M. de Roo Beoordelingscommissie: Prof. Dr. P. Di Vecchia Prof. Dr. P.K. Townsend Prof. Dr. E.P. Verlinde ISBN 90-367-1254-8 Contents 1 Introduction 7 2 String Theory 13 2.1 The bosonic string .......................... 13 2.1.1 Closed string spectrum ................... 18 2.1.2 Open string spectrum .................... 24 2.1.3 String interactions . .................... 26 2.1.4 T-duality and the appearance of D–branes . ....... 28 2.1.5 D–branes .......................... 32 2.1.6 Strings in general background fields ............ 35 2.2 The superstring . .......................... 38 2.2.1 The GSO–projection .................... 44 2.2.2 Closed Type IIA and Type IIB superstrings . ....... 45 2.2.3 The Heterotic superstring .................. 47 2.2.4 The Type I superstring ................... 48 2.2.5 Superstring T–duality and D–branes ............ 49 3 Superstring low energy limits and dualities 51 3.1 Supersymmetry algebras and BPS states . ............. 51 3.1.1 The D = 11 supersymmetry algebra ............ 52 3.1.2 Supersymmetry algebras in ten dimensions . ....... 57 3.2 Supergravities . .......................... 61 3.2.1 Supergravity in eleven dimensions ............. 62 3.2.2 Supergravities in ten dimensions . ............. 65 3.3 Dualities, M–theory and p–branes ................. 72 3.3.1 BPS p–brane solutions ................... 72 3.3.2 Dualities and effective worldvolume theories ....... 79 5 CONTENTS 4 Matrix theory 83 4.1 The Matrix model conjecture .................... 83 4.1.1 D0–branes and DLCQ M–theory .............. 84 4.2 BPS objects in Matrix theory .................... 90 4.2.1 Basic Matrix theory extended objects . ........ 91 4.2.2 Intersecting BPS objects in Matrix theory . ........ 99 4.2.3 Matrix BPS states and the M–theory algebra .......103 4.3 The status of Matrix theory .....................107 5 String solitons and the field theory limit 109 5.1 String soliton geometries . .....................109 5.1.1 Near–horizon geometries of p–branes . ........110 5.1.2 Domain–walls and Anti–de Sitter spacetimes .......116 5.2 The field theory limit . .....................126 5.2.1 The general setup . .....................126 5.2.2 The AdS/CFT examples . ...............134 5.2.3 Non–trivial dilaton Dp–branes in D = 10.........138 5.2.4 Non–trivial dilaton dp–branes in D = 6 ..........146 6 Emerging structure and discussion 155 A String theory units and charge conventions 159 Bibliography 163 Samenvatting 173 Dankwoord 181 6 Chapter 1 Introduction At this moment the physics of elementary particles is well described by the Stan- dard Model. At the smallest scales we can experimentally probe ( 100 GeV), the Standard Model predicts the outcomes of (scattering) experiments with incredi- ble accuracy. The Standard Model accommodates the (observed) constituents of matter, the quarks and leptons, and the vector particles responsible for the medi- ation of the strong and electroweak forces. The only ingredient of the Standard Model which still lacks experimental support is the Higgs boson particle, which is thought to be responsible for the breaking of the electroweak gauge symmetry and the masses of the different particles. One can therefore conclude that at this mo- ment there is no direct experimental need to construct and investigate theoretical models that go beyond the Standard Model1. On the other hand there are many theoretical reasons to go beyond the Stan- dard Model. The pillars of contemporary theoretical physics are quantum me- chanics and general relativity. The Standard Model is a collection of quantum (gauge) field theories which can be considered to be a merger of quantum me- chanics and special relativity, describing physics at small scales and relativistic energies. General relativity has proven its accuracy on large scales describing very massive objects. When we keep increasing the energy scales and at the same time keep decreasing our length scales, we expect new physics which is not described by either general relativity or the Standard Model. General relativity breaks down at short distances and in the Standard Model or in quantum field theory we should incorporate the effects of (quantum) gravitational interactions. The typical energy 1We have to remark here that recent experiments have most probably excluded the possibility that all neutrinos are massless, which requires a modification of the Standard Model. Still, in the context of this thesis we would like to consider this a minor modification. 7 Chapter 1. Introduction 19 scale at which this happens is called the Planck mass ( 10 GeV). This scale is way beyond the experimental energies currently accessible and one might wonder whether it will ever be possible to attain these energies in a controlled experiment. This does not mean, however, that this problem is of purely academic interest. 43 Immediately after the big bang ( 10 s), from which our observable universe evolved, the energies were of the order of the Planck scale and the physics during that (short) time determined the further development of the universe. It is therefore of direct interest in cosmology to search for a theory that is able to unify or merge quantum mechanics and general relativity. Other arguments are of a more theoretical and/or aesthetic nature. The Stan- dard Model contains a huge amount of parameters which have to be determined by experiments, e.g. masses, coupling constants, angles and so on. One would expect (or perhaps one likes to expect) that a fundamental theory of nature will not allow too many adjustable parameters. In the best case scenario, we would like our the- ory to be unique. Many people therefore like to think of the standard model as an effective theory, only applicable at our current available energy scales [1]. This point of view is backed up by considering the running of the coupling constants of the different gauge theories that are part of the Standard Model. When plotting the coupling constants as a function of the energy scale, one finds that at a particular high energy scale, referred to as the Grand Unified Theory (GUT) energy scale 14 ( 10 GeV), the three coupling constants all seem to meet in (approximately) the same point. This suggests a possible unified description at and above the GUT energy scale. The GUT energy scale lies several orders of magnitude below the Planck scale, so this unified theory would not involve quantum gravity. However, for the three gauge theory coupling constants to meet at the same point, the theoretical concept of supersymmetry improves on the approximate result without supersymmetry. Supersymmetry is a symmetry that connects bosons and fermions: starting with a bosonic particle one can perform a supersymmetry transformation and end up with a fermionic particle. In our world supersymmetry, if it exists, must be a broken symmetry, because we have not detected any supersymmetric partners of the Stan- dard Model particles. Global supersymmetric quantum field theories have slightly different properties than their non–supersymmetric counterparts. Most impor- tantly, in the perturbative expansion cancellations take place between bosons and fermions, generically making supersymmetric quantum theories better behaved. Local supersymmetric theories automatically include supergravity, the supersym- metric version of general relativity. So Grand Unified Theory, supersymmetry and supergravity are intimately linked, which again suggests a possible unified 8 description of gauge field theories and quantum gravity at the Planck scale. From another point of view the basic fact that general relativity is a classical field theory is unsatisfactory. At scales around the Planck length, quantum gravi- tational effects are bound to become important and we will need a quantum theory of gravity. However, so far general relativity has resisted all standard methods of quantization and is said to be non–renormalizable (for an overview see [2]). One may think this is just a technical problem, but there are fundamental interpreta- tional problems as well when trying to quantize general relativity because we are trying to quantize space and time. Many theoretical physicists agree that in order to deal with the problem of quantization of space and time a radically new ap- proach is called for. This is also emphasized by the confusing properties of black holes in general relativity, which in a semiclassical approach are not black at all and emit black body Hawking radiation. Studying these objects in general relativ- ity, it turns out that one can formulate black hole laws that are strikingly similar to the laws of thermodynamics. For example, one can assign a temperature and an entropy to a black hole. At this moment one of the key questions in theoretical physics is to try to understand what the fundamental degrees of freedom are that make up the entropy of the black hole and how these thermodynamic degrees of freedom arise from (quantum) general relativity. At this moment, string theory is the only theoretical construction that can deal with quantum gravity2 albeit in a perturbative, background dependent way. String theory needs supersymmetry and extra spacetime dimensions to be set up consis- tently (free of anomalies). In fact, there exist five different superstring theories which are all living in ten spacetime dimensions and which are distinguished by the number of supersymmetries and by the kind of strings (open and/or closed). The construction of these five different anomaly free string theories is referred to as the first string revolution (1984 1985).
Recommended publications
  • Classical Strings and Membranes in the Ads/CFT Correspondence
    Classical Strings and Membranes in the AdS/CFT Correspondence GEORGIOS LINARDOPOULOS Faculty of Physics, Department of Nuclear and Particle Physics National and Kapodistrian University of Athens and Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos" Dissertation submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens June 2015 Doctoral Committee Supervisor Emmanuel Floratos Professor Emer., N.K.U.A. Co-Supervisor Minos Axenides Res. Director, N.C.S.R., "Demokritos" Supervising Committee Member Nikolaos Tetradis Professor, N.K.U.A. Thesis Defense Committee Ioannis Bakas Professor, N.T.U.A. Georgios Diamandis Assoc. Professor, N.K.U.A. Athanasios Lahanas Professor Emer., N.K.U.A. Konstantinos Sfetsos Professor, N.K.U.A. i This thesis is dedicated to my parents iii Acknowledgements This doctoral dissertation is based on the research that took place during the years 2012–2015 at the Institute of Nuclear & Particle Physics of the National Center for Sci- entific Research "Demokritos" and the Department of Nuclear & Particle Physics at the Physics Faculty of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. I had the privilege to have professors Emmanuel Floratos (principal supervisor), Mi- nos Axenides (co-supervisor) and Nikolaos Tetradis as the 3-member doctoral committee that supervised my PhD. I would like to thank them for the fruitful cooperation we had, their help and their guidance. I feel deeply grateful to my teacher Emmanuel Floratos for everything that he has taught me. It is extremely difficult for me to imagine a better and kinder supervisor. I thank him for his advices, his generosity and his love.
    [Show full text]
  • String Theory. Volume 1, Introduction to the Bosonic String
    This page intentionally left blank String Theory, An Introduction to the Bosonic String The two volumes that comprise String Theory provide an up-to-date, comprehensive, and pedagogic introduction to string theory. Volume I, An Introduction to the Bosonic String, provides a thorough introduction to the bosonic string, based on the Polyakov path integral and conformal field theory. The first four chapters introduce the central ideas of string theory, the tools of conformal field theory and of the Polyakov path integral, and the covariant quantization of the string. The next three chapters treat string interactions: the general formalism, and detailed treatments of the tree-level and one loop amplitudes. Chapter eight covers toroidal compactification and many important aspects of string physics, such as T-duality and D-branes. Chapter nine treats higher-order amplitudes, including an analysis of the finiteness and unitarity, and various nonperturbative ideas. An appendix giving a short course on path integral methods is also included. Volume II, Superstring Theory and Beyond, begins with an introduction to supersym- metric string theories and goes on to a broad presentation of the important advances of recent years. The first three chapters introduce the type I, type II, and heterotic superstring theories and their interactions. The next two chapters present important recent discoveries about strongly coupled strings, beginning with a detailed treatment of D-branes and their dynamics, and covering string duality, M-theory, and black hole entropy. A following chapter collects many classic results in conformal field theory. The final four chapters are concerned with four-dimensional string theories, and have two goals: to show how some of the simplest string models connect with previous ideas for unifying the Standard Model; and to collect many important and beautiful general results on world-sheet and spacetime symmetries.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a String Dual of SYK Arxiv:2103.03187V1 [Hep-Th] 4 Mar
    Towards A String Dual of SYK Akash Goel and Herman Verlinde Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Abstract: We propose a paradigm for realizing the SYK model within string theory. Using the large N matrix description of c < 1 string theory, we show that the effective theory on a large number Q of FZZT D-branes in (p; 1) minimal string theory takes the form of the disorder averaged SYK model with J p interaction. The SYK fermions represent open strings between the FZZT branes and the ZZ branes that underly the matrix model. The continuum SYK dynamics arises upon taking the large Q limit. We observe several qualitative and quantitative links between the SYK model and (p; q) minimal string theory and propose that the two describe different phases of a single system. We comment on the dual string interpretation of double scaled SYK and on the relevance of our results to the recent discussion of the role of ensemble averaging in holography. arXiv:2103.03187v2 [hep-th] 24 Aug 2021 Contents 1 Introduction2 2 SYK from the Two Matrix Model4 2.1 FZZT-branes in the two matrix model4 2.2 Kontsevich matrix model from FZZT branes6 2.3 SYK matrix model from FZZT branes7 3 Towards the Continuum SYK model8 3.1 Non-commutative SYK8 4 From Minimal Strings to SYK 10 4.1 SYK and the (p; q) spectral curve 11 4.2 FZZT brane correlation function 12 4.3 Minimal String-SYK phase diagram 13 5 SYK as a Non-Critical String 14 6 Conclusion 16 A D-branes in Minimal String Theory 18 A.1 Matrices and the non-commutative torus 23 A.2 Non-commutative SYK 24 A.3 Matrix SYK 26 A.4 Mapping between Matrix SYK and Non-Commutative SYK 27 { 1 { 1 Introduction The SYK model is the prototype of a maximally chaotic quantum system with low energy dynamics given by near-AdS2 gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Pitp Lectures
    MIFPA-10-34 PiTP Lectures Katrin Becker1 Department of Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 String duality 3 2.1 T-duality and closed bosonic strings .................... 3 2.2 T-duality and open strings ......................... 4 2.3 Buscher rules ................................ 5 3 Low-energy effective actions 5 3.1 Type II theories ............................... 5 3.1.1 Massless bosons ........................... 6 3.1.2 Charges of D-branes ........................ 7 3.1.3 T-duality for type II theories .................... 7 3.1.4 Low-energy effective actions .................... 8 3.2 M-theory ................................... 8 3.2.1 2-derivative action ......................... 8 3.2.2 8-derivative action ......................... 9 3.3 Type IIB and F-theory ........................... 9 3.4 Type I .................................... 13 3.5 SO(32) heterotic string ........................... 13 4 Compactification and moduli 14 4.1 The torus .................................. 14 4.2 Calabi-Yau 3-folds ............................. 16 5 M-theory compactified on Calabi-Yau 4-folds 17 5.1 The supersymmetric flux background ................... 18 5.2 The warp factor ............................... 18 5.3 SUSY breaking solutions .......................... 19 1 These are two lectures dealing with supersymmetry (SUSY) for branes and strings. These lectures are mainly based on ref. [1] which the reader should consult for original references and additional discussions. 1 Introduction To make contact between superstring theory and the real world we have to understand the vacua of the theory. Of particular interest for vacuum construction are, on the one hand, D-branes. These are hyper-planes on which open strings can end. On the world-volume of coincident D-branes, non-abelian gauge fields can exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Duality and the Nature of Quantum Space-Time
    Duality and the nature of quantum space-time Sanjaye Ramgoolam Queen Mary, University of London Oxford, January 24, 2009 INTRODUCTION Strings provide a working theory of quantum gravity existing in harmony with particle physics Successes include computations of quantum graviton scattering, new models of beyond-standard-model particle physics based on branes, computation of black hole entropy A powerful new discovery : Duality I An unexpected equivalence between two systems, which a priori look completely unrelated, if not manifest opposites. I Large and Small (T-duality) I Gravitational and non-Gravitational. (Gauge-String duality) Unification and Duality I They are both powerful results of string theory. They allow us to calculate things we could not calculate before. I Unification : We asked for it and found it. We kind of know why it had to be there. I Duality : We didn’t ask for it. We use it. We don’t know what it really means. Unification v/s Duality I Unification has an illustrious history dating back to the days of Maxwell. I Before Maxwell, we thought magnets attracting iron on the one hand and lightning on the other had nothing to do with each other I After Maxwell : Magnets produce B-field. Electric discharge in lightning is caused by E-fields. The coupled equations of both allow fluctuating E, B-fields which transport energy travelling at the speed of light. In fact light is electromagnetic waves. Unification v/s Duality I Einstein tried to unify gravity with quantum phsyics. I String Theory goes a long way. I Computes graviton interaction probablities.
    [Show full text]
  • 6D Fractional Quantum Hall Effect
    Published for SISSA by Springer Received: March 21, 2018 Accepted: May 7, 2018 Published: May 18, 2018 6D fractional quantum Hall effect JHEP05(2018)120 Jonathan J. Heckmana and Luigi Tizzanob aDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A. bDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: We present a 6D generalization of the fractional quantum Hall effect involv- ing membranes coupled to a three-form potential in the presence of a large background four-form flux. The low energy physics is governed by a bulk 7D topological field theory of abelian three-form potentials with a single derivative Chern-Simons-like action coupled to a 6D anti-chiral theory of Euclidean effective strings. We derive the fractional conductivity, and explain how continued fractions which figure prominently in the classification of 6D su- perconformal field theories correspond to a hierarchy of excited states. Using methods from conformal field theory we also compute the analog of the Laughlin wavefunction. Com- pactification of the 7D theory provides a uniform perspective on various lower-dimensional gapped systems coupled to boundary degrees of freedom. We also show that a supersym- metric version of the 7D theory embeds in M-theory, and can be decoupled from gravity. Encouraged by this, we present a conjecture in which IIB string theory is an edge mode of a 10+2-dimensional bulk topological theory, thus placing all twelve dimensions of F-theory on a physical footing.
    [Show full text]
  • Flux Backgrounds, Ads/CFT and Generalized Geometry Praxitelis Ntokos
    Flux backgrounds, AdS/CFT and Generalized Geometry Praxitelis Ntokos To cite this version: Praxitelis Ntokos. Flux backgrounds, AdS/CFT and Generalized Geometry. Physics [physics]. Uni- versité Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI, 2016. English. NNT : 2016PA066206. tel-01620214 HAL Id: tel-01620214 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01620214 Submitted on 20 Oct 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE Spécialité : Physique École doctorale : « Physique en Île-de-France » réalisée à l’Institut de Physique Thèorique CEA/Saclay présentée par Praxitelis NTOKOS pour obtenir le grade de : DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE Sujet de la thèse : Flux backgrounds, AdS/CFT and Generalized Geometry soutenue le 23 septembre 2016 devant le jury composé de : M. Ignatios ANTONIADIS Examinateur M. Stephano GIUSTO Rapporteur Mme Mariana GRAÑA Directeur de thèse M. Alessandro TOMASIELLO Rapporteur Abstract: The search for string theory vacuum solutions with non-trivial fluxes is of particular importance for the construction of models relevant for particle physics phenomenology. In the framework of the AdS/CFT correspondence, four-dimensional gauge theories which can be considered to descend from N = 4 SYM are dual to ten- dimensional field configurations with geometries having an asymptotically AdS5 factor.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCALIZATION and STRING DUALITY 1. Introduction According
    LOCALIZATION AND STRING DUALITY KEFENG LIU 1. Introduction According to string theorists, String Theory, as the most promising candidate for the grand unification of all fundamental forces in the nature, should be the final theory of the world, and should be unique. But now there are five different looking string theories. As argued by the physicists, these theories should be equivalent, in a way dual to each other. On the other hand all previous theories like the Yang-Mills and the Chern-Simons theory should be parts of string theory. In particular their partition functions should be equal or equivalent to each other in the sense that they are equal after certain transformation. To compute partition functions, physicists use localization technique, a modern version of residue theorem, on infinite dimen- sional spaces. More precisely they apply localization formally to path integrals which is not well-defined yet in mathematics. In many cases such computations reduce the path integrals to certain integrals of various Chern classes on various finite dimensional moduli spaces, such as the moduli spaces of stable maps and the moduli spaces of vector bundles. The identifications of these partition functions among different theories have produced many surprisingly beautiful mathematical formulas like the famous mirror formula [22], as well as the Mari˜no-Vafa formula [25]. The mathematical proofs of these formulas from the string duality also depend on localization techniques on these various finite dimensional moduli spaces. The purpose of this note is to discuss our recent work on the subject. I will briefly discuss the proof of the Marin˜o-Vafa formula, its generalizations and the related topological vertex theory [1].
    [Show full text]
  • M-Theory Solutions and Intersecting D-Brane Systems
    M-Theory Solutions and Intersecting D-Brane Systems A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Rahim Oraji ©Rahim Oraji, December/2011. All rights reserved. Permission to Use In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Postgrad- uate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Physics and Engineering Physics 116 Science Place University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada S7N 5E2 i Abstract It is believed that fundamental M-theory in the low-energy limit can be described effectively by D=11 supergravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Ads/CFT Correspondence Outline I CFT
    Introduction to the AdS/CFT correspondence Outline I CFT review II AdS/CFT correspondence |||||||||||||||||||||||| III Large N review 5 IV D3 branes and AdS5×S |||||||||||||||||| V Finite T, probe branes, quarks, other extensions 1 0 References Descriptive: • B. Zwiebach, \A first course in string theory," 2nd ed., (Cambridge, 2004). • S. S. Gubser and A. Karch, \From gauge-string duality to strong in- teractions: a pedestrian's guide," [arXiv:0901.0935]. Detailed: • O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, \Large N field theories, string theory and gravity," [arXiv:hep-th/9905111]. • I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, \AdS/CFT correspondence and sym- metry breaking," [arXiv:hep-th/9905104]. • E. D'Hoker and D. Z. Freedman, \Supersymmetric gauge theories and the AdS/CFT correspondence," [arXiv:hep-th/0201253]. • K. Skenderis, \Lecture notes on holographic renormalization," [arXiv:hep- th/0209067]. 2 I CFT review Scale-invariant quantum field theories are important as possible end- points of RG flows. Knowledge of them and their relevant deformations (partially) organizes the space of QFTs. UV CFT CFT IR CFT It is believed that unitary scale-invariant theories are also conformally invariant: the space-time symmetry group Poincar´ed×Dilatations en- larges to the Conformald group. (d = no. of space-time dimensions.) Equivalently, there exists a local, conserved, traceless energy-momentum tensor T µν(x). 3 CFT review: conformal algebra Conformald = group of reparameterizations which preserve the (flat) space-time metric up to
    [Show full text]
  • String Field Theory, Nucl
    1 String field theory W. TAYLOR MIT, Stanford University SU-ITP-06/14 MIT-CTP-3747 hep-th/0605202 Abstract This elementary introduction to string field theory highlights the fea- tures and the limitations of this approach to quantum gravity as it is currently understood. String field theory is a formulation of string the- ory as a field theory in space-time with an infinite number of massive fields. Although existing constructions of string field theory require ex- panding around a fixed choice of space-time background, the theory is in principle background-independent, in the sense that different back- grounds can be realized as different field configurations in the theory. String field theory is the only string formalism developed so far which, in principle, has the potential to systematically address questions involv- ing multiple asymptotically distinct string backgrounds. Thus, although it is not yet well defined as a quantum theory, string field theory may eventually be helpful for understanding questions related to cosmology arXiv:hep-th/0605202v2 28 Jun 2006 in string theory. 1.1 Introduction In the early days of the subject, string theory was understood only as a perturbative theory. The theory arose from the study of S-matrices and was conceived of as a new class of theory describing perturbative interactions of massless particles including the gravitational quanta, as well as an infinite family of massive particles associated with excited string states. In string theory, instead of the one-dimensional world line 1 2 W. Taylor of a pointlike particle tracing out a path through space-time, a two- dimensional surface describes the trajectory of an oscillating loop of string, which appears pointlike only to an observer much larger than the string.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Lunch from T-Duality
    Free Lunch from T-Duality Ulrich Theis Institute for Theoretical Physics, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Max-Wien-Platz 1, D{07743 Jena, Germany [email protected] We consider a simple method of generating solutions to Einstein gravity coupled to a dilaton and a 2-form gauge potential in n dimensions, starting from an arbitrary (n m)- − dimensional Ricci-flat metric with m commuting Killing vectors. It essentially consists of a particular combination of coordinate transformations and T-duality and is related to the so-called null Melvin twists and TsT transformations. Examples obtained in this way include two charged black strings in five dimensions and a finite action configuration in three dimensions derived from empty flat space. The latter leads us to amend the effective action by a specific boundary term required for it to admit solutions with positive action. An extension of our method involving an S-duality transformation that is applicable to four-dimensional seed metrics produces further nontrivial solutions in five dimensions. 1 Introduction One of the most attractive features of string theory is that it gives rise to gravity: the low-energy effective action for the background fields on a string world-sheet is diffeomor- phism invariant and includes the Einstein-Hilbert term of general relativity. This effective action is obtained by integrating renormalization group beta functions whose vanishing is required for Weyl invariance of the world-sheet sigma model and can be interpreted as a set of equations of motion for the background fields. Solutions to these equations determine spacetimes in which the string propagates.
    [Show full text]