Conceptualizing Moral Panic Through a Moral Economy of Harm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conceptualizing Moral Panic Through a Moral Economy of Harm Conceptualizing Moral Panic through aMoral Economy of Harm SEAN P. HIER (Queen’s University) ABSTRACT This paperexplicates acritical theory ofmoral panic, ar- guingthat there is an afnity tobe discerned between the sociologyof moralpanic and the sociologyof moralregulation. It isdemonstratedhow effortsto distance sociologicalinvestiga- tionsof moralregulation from studies of moralpanic have been foundedon a narrowtreatment ofthe ways in which the lat- ter have conceptualizedpanics uncritically as irrationalsocietal overreactions stemming fromsome variantof ‘ social anxiety.’ Advocatinga conceptualizationwhich attends tothe complex- ity ofways in which human conduct is governed,explanatory importanceis situatedin Valverde’s formulationof ‘moralcapi- tal,’showing how her modelnot only enables afusionbetween apoliticaleconomy ofthe state andethical subjectivity,but morecrucial between panics andregulatory projects through the productionof a moraleconomy ofharm. Introduction Over muchof the pastdecade, it has becomecommonplace in studies of moralpanic to problematize the factthat, far from the restrictivecon nes ofacademe, ‘ moralpanic’ has entered the lexicon ofmainstream society aswell asthe media.In fact,so dispersed is the conceptualimagery of the conceptthat, once purported to be the unintendedoutcome of journalistic practices,McRobbie and Thornton (1995) declare that moral panic has becomea goal.The falloutof the increasingly uidand eclectic usage Critical Sociology, Volume 28,issue 3 also availableonline Ó 2002Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden www.brill.nl 312 Hier ² ofthe languageand referent of moral panic has been thatsociologists have cleaved ontheir endorsement of the analyticutility of the concept. Whilst thosewho have soughtto employ the referentof moral panic primarilyin the contextof empirical investigation have tendedto do so inan uncriticaland indiscriminate manner (cf. Goode and Ben-Yehuda 1994;Thompson 1998; Goode 2000; Doyle andLaCombe 2000; Tavener 2000),the resulthas been thatthose concerned with the wider eld of moralregulation have rejectedthe utilityof the moralpanic concept on the groundsof its purported tendency toimport a negative normative judgementpertaining to irrational societal responses stemming from some variantof ‘socialanxiety’ (Hunt 1999; Moore and Valverde 2000). In lightof the conceptualin ation characterizing the sociological literatureconcerned with moral panic, and in responseto the inhospitable receptionof moral panic in scholarly research concerned with moral regulation,this paper conceptualizes moral panic as aformof moral regulation.Morespeci cally, moralpanic is formulatedin terms of acritical conceptionof ideology which allows for the discursive[re]production of asense ofphenomenal securitythrough a ‘moraleconomy of harm.’ Conceptualizingmoral panic as an ideologico-discursiveformation neither negates the factthat it may vary inits speci c contents,nor that it may serve tostimulate a variety of‘ moralactions’ or facilitate a range of‘ socialfunctions.’ Taking care to explicate whatis understood as the afnity betweenmoral panic and moral regulation, an approximationof the conceptualfoundation from which moral panics derive is sought, but noattempt is made to reveal anything aboutthe uniquefeatures of specic instancesof moral panic. Expressions of the latter,it is maintained, are loggedin the spatialand temporal parameters of variegated governmental congurations, susceptible to elucidationthrough the analyticinterrogation ofthe socialand political circumstances surrounding each panic’s inception andhistoricity. TheSociology of Moral Panic In hisclassic study, Stanley Cohen(1972:9) explains that Societiesappear to be subject,every now andthen, toperiods of moralpanic. Acondition,episode, person or group of persons emerges tobecome de ned as athreat tosocietal values andinterests; its natureis presented in astylized andstereotypical fashionby the mass media : : : Sometimesthe objectof the panicis quitenovel andat other times itis something which has been in existence longenough, but suddenly appears in the limelight.Sometimes the panicpasses overand is forgotten,except in folkloreand collective memory; atother times ithas moreserious and long-lasting repercussions andmight Conceptualizing Moral Panic 313 ² producesuch changes as those in legaland social policyor even in the way society conceives itself. ForCohen, every moralpanic requires the delineationof a scapegoator ‘folkdevil,’ an identiable objectonto which social fears and anxieties may beprojected.As the personication of evil, he conceptualizesfolk devils as susceptibleto instant recognition as ‘ unambiguouslyunfavorable symbols’ (p.41) which are stripped of all positivecharacteristics and endowed with pejorativeevaluations. Cohen is clear in hisstudy of the modsand rockers phenomenonof the 1960s,however, that moral panics come about through acomplexchain of social interactions involving claimsmakers, moral guardiansand the media,set inthe contextof socio-political change and an ensuingclimate of ‘ culturalambiguity.’ What thissigni es forCohen isthat, although moral panics center on a particularfolk devil, the locus ofthe panicis not the objectof its symbolic resonances, not the folkdevil itself.Rather, folk devils serve asthe ideologicalembodiment of deeper anxieties, perceivedof as ‘ aproblem’only inandthrough social de nition andconstruction. Derivingfrom the legacy ofCohen’ s seminal work,the conceptof moralpanic has predominantlybeen invoked uncriticallyin sociological analyses torefer to ‘an ideology,’a general set ofideaswhich are imputed toserve asthe foundationfor a variety offorms of collective behavior. Employingan uncriticalconception of ideology, considerable theorizing onmoral panic has unfoldedwith respect to the media,whereby moral panichas simultaneouslybeen conceivedof as a set ofideas and a form ofsocial action brought about through a moregeneralized state of fear or alarm.Whilst ina practicalsense humaninteraction can be understood simultaneouslyas an expressionof belief and action, recent commentary has afrmed that there isan importantanalytic distinction to be maintained betweenwhat people think andwhat they do,and an even greaterlevel ofanalyticcare to be exercised concerningwhat appears in the mediaand whatpeople accept as factual (cf. Ungar 2001). Disappointingly, the bulk oftheorizing contained within the sociologyof moral panic has conated notonly mediadiscourse and social perception in an uncriticalmanner, buthas failedto explore fully the relationshipbetween social perception andcollective action. Indicativeof thistendency isVictor’ s (1998)study of ritualchild abuse, where,using Goode and Ben-Yehuda’ s (1994)near-orthodox topology of ‘ve crucialindicators’ as a foil,he denes moralpanic as ‘ asocietal responseto beliefs about a threatfrom moral deviants [ : : : whichrepresent] acollective formof behavior characterized by suddenlyincreased concern andhostility in a signicant segment ofsociety’ (p. 542, 543). At least twoproblems can be identied in thisconceptualization, the rstof which 314 Hier ² involves measurement.It is a necessary assumptionembedded in Victor’ s denition that moral panic as a collective formof behavioris presupposed byideological formations understood to envelop ‘signicant segments of society,’but what exactly isimplied by ‘ adesignatedsegment’ of society isvaguely formulated,and the pointat which moral panic manifests as a formof collective actionis not clear. It was this conceptual problematic thatUngar (2001:278-81) had in mind when he arguedthat, in the absenceof any primafacie behavioral evidence ofpublic involvement (vigilante groups,boycotts, protests), researchers have nessed the problem oftapping into public concern by usingmedia coverage or legislative activityas a surrogatefor widespread solicitude. His reasoning suggests that,because both legislative activityand the productionof mediareporting involve actorsseveral stepsremoved from the general public,there isno directlink tobe imputed between public concern and what appears in the media/legislation.Thus, although it may beconceded that Ungar is justied in his appraisal of a patternwhich has cometo characterize the literature,in the absence ofany attentionto a criticaltheory of ideology(or tocritical media theory), his critique remains suspect – apointaddressed below. The secondproblem concerns the difculty encountered when, in con- atingthe productionand reproduction of meaning with the importance ofthe mobilizationof collective formsof behavior in anuncriticalmanner, explanatoryimportance is (perhaps inadvertently) placedon the function, notcontent(s), of panic discourses. Rather than representationalpatterns embodyingthat which is ideologically normative and culturally modular, ‘panics’are henceforth inferred to be embedded in the ‘collective con- science’of society (Goode and Ben-Yehuda 1994), appearing and disap- pearingwith great regularity in the interestsof the ‘socialcontrol of de- viance’(Victor 1998). To put this differently, the centralfocus is not on the contentsof particular ideological formations which ndpoints of reso- nance withinthe widerdiscursive community, but rather on the ‘function,’ ‘intention’or ‘ purpose’of the discourse.Not only doessuch an emphasis onfunctionality serve tobroaden the eld ofdeterministic claims about avariety offolk devils inthe interestsof ‘ socialcohesion’ vis-a-vis the indiscriminatelabeling of a variety offorms of praxis as ‘ moralpanic,’ butit simultaneously narrows
Recommended publications
  • MANUFACTURING MORAL PANIC: Weaponizing Children to Undermine Gender Justice and Human Rights
    MANUFACTURING MORAL PANIC: Weaponizing Children to Undermine Gender Justice and Human Rights Research Team: Juliana Martínez, PhD; Ángela Duarte, MA; María Juliana Rojas, EdM and MA. Sentiido (Colombia) March 2021 The Elevate Children Funders Group is the leading global network of funders focused exclusively on the wellbeing and rights of children and youth. We focus on the most marginalized and vulnerable to abuse, neglect, exploitation, and violence. Global Philanthropy Project (GPP) is a collaboration of funders and philanthropic advisors working to expand global philanthropic support to advance the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) people in the Global1 South and East. TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary ...................................................................................... 4 Acronyms .................................................................................................. 4 Definitions ................................................................................................. 5 Letter from the Directors: ......................................................... 8 Executive Summary ................................................................... 10 Report Outline ..........................................................................................13 MOBILIZING A GENDER-RESTRICTIVE WORLDVIEW .... 14 The Making of the Contemporary Gender-Restrictive Movement ................................................... 18 Instrumentalizing Cultural Anxieties .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Are South Asian Men the UK Media's New Folk Devils?
    www.crimejusticejournal.com IJCJ&SD 2015 4(2): 34‐49 ISSN 2202–8005 Child Grooming and Sexual Exploitation: Are South Asian Men the UK Media’s New Folk Devils? Aisha K Gill University of Roehampton, UK Karen Harrison University of Hull, UK Abstract In May 2012, nine men from the Rochdale area of Manchester were found guilty of sexually exploiting a number of underage girls. Media reporting on the trial focused on the fact that eight of the men were of Pakistani descent, while all the girls were white. Framing similar cases in Preston, Rotherham, Derby, Shropshire, Oxford, Telford and Middlesbrough as ethnically motivated, the media incited moral panic over South Asian grooming gangs preying on white girls. While these cases shed light on the broader problem of sexual exploitation in Britain, they also reveal continuing misconceptions that stereotype South Asian men as ‘natural’ perpetrators of these crimes due to culturally‐specific notions of hegemonic masculinity. Examining newspaper coverage from 2012 to 2013, this article discusses the discourse of the British media’s portrayal of South Asian men as perpetrators of sexual violence against white victims, inadvertently construing ‘South Asian men’ as ‘folk devils’. Keywords Folk devils; masculinity; media representations; moral panic; sexual exploitation; South Asian men. Introduction Over the last four years, the United Kingdom (UK) has been beset by a moral panic concerning ‘South Asian men’ grooming white girls for sexual exploitation. This moral panic derived from a number of well‐publicised cases, the most infamous of which took place in Rochdale, Greater Manchester. Here, a group of nine men, eight of Pakistani origin or descent, preyed on under‐ aged white girls for sex before trafficking them for prostitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Panic Revisited-Part Two , '
    Moral panic revisited-Part two , ' Claire Hamilton LL.B. (Ling. Franc.), B.L., M.Litt., DipEurCon on Human Rights. Assistant Lecturer in Criminology at DIT. Critiques of moral panic So what IU'e the implicatign,s ofleft realism for the theory In part one of this article (I.C.L.J. 2005(1 )), the evolution of of moral panic? This questi!'l11 ree.eives the fullest treatment moral panic theory was traced from its coinage by Stanley in Young's article on left realist .criminology in the Oxford Cohen1 in 1972 until the present day. It was observed that Handbook ofCriminology.4 Young claims that criminologists since the 1990s, "moral panic" hils strayed from its original have been guilty jn their application of the theory of a certain sociological base to become a term regularly used by partiality of focus-focusing on the reaction to the crime journalists to describe a variety of phenomena, sometimes within society and the criminaljl:tstice systew at the expense pejoratively, sometimes not. In the light of this ambiguity, of the actual ~rime itself, the significance of which is and the considerable body of criticism which has been downplayed. Indeed, Young's critique of left idealism is encountered by proponents of tlu:: concept, it is timely to replete with similar aspersions: crime is sidelined, glossed take stock of the strengths and weaknesses of the concept. over, warginalised; it is not t)le focus of attention. In a It is proposed in this article to attempt to determine its curre:nt oblique reference to the wor~ .of, inter alia, Cohen, Young usefulness through a critical examination of the main castigates what he sees as a minimisation of the effect of challenges to moral panic theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy of a Moral Panic: Western Mainstream Media's
    Changing Societies & Personalities, 2019 Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 189–206 http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/csp.2019.3.3.071 ARTICLE The Anatomy of a Moral Panic: Western Mainstream Media’s Russia Scapegoat Greg Simons Uppsala University, Sweden Turiba University, Latvia Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia ABSTRACT Since 2014, there has been a very concerted campaign launched by the neo-liberal Western mainstream mass media against Russia. The format and content suggest that this is an attempt to induce a moral panic among the Western publics. It seems to be intended to create a sense of fear and to switch the logic to a series of emotionally- based reactions to assertion propaganda. Russia has been variously blamed for many different events and trends around the world, such as the “destroying” of Western “democracy”, and democratic values. In many regards, Russia is projected as being an existential threat in both the physical and intangible realms. This paper traces the strategic messages and narratives of the “Russia threat” as it is presented in Western mainstream media. Russia is connoted as a scapegoat for the failings of the neo-liberal democratic political order to maintain its global hegemony; therefore, Russia is viewed as the “menacing” other and a desperate measure to halt this gradual decline and loss of power and influence. This ultimately means that this type of journalism fails in its supposed fourth estate role, by directly aiding the hegemonic political power. KEYWORDS moral panic, Western mainstream media, Russia, propaganda, scapegoating, fourth estate Received 28 July 2019 © 2019 Gregory Simons Accepted 13 September 2019 [email protected] Published online 5 October 2019 190 Greg Simons Introduction Moral panic has been developed as a concept within sociology and came to greater attention after Stanley Cohen’s 1972 book on Folk Devils and Moral Panic.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyberbullying Through the New Media: Findings from an International Network
    Alberta Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 61.3, Fall 2015, 359-362 Book Review Cyberbullying Through the New Media: Findings from an International Network Peter K. Smith and Georges Steffgen, editors New York: Psychology Press, 2013 Reviewed by: Jonathan Kremser Kutztown University of Pennsylvania On September 22, 2010, Tyler Clementi, a first-year student at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, jumped from the George Washington Bridge into the Hudson River after his roommate used a webcam to record Clementi’s encounter with another man in a dorm room. The student’s tragic death quickly shifted the issue of cyberbullying to the forefront of what seems like a growing list of concerns facing both children and young adults. In response to the Clementi case, legislators in New Jersey—the state in which he resided—passed a new Anti- Bullying Bill of Rights Act, which is often referred to in the media as “the toughest such measure in the country” (Rundquist, 2012, para. 3). The legislation mandates strict new rules and time frames for schools to address allegations of bullying, resulting in the term HIB (harassment, intimidation, and bullying), which has now become part of the anti-bullying vocabulary in schools across New Jersey. Cyberbullying Through the New Media: Findings from an International Network sheds light on a problem that is both old and new. The first systematic study of bullying is attributed to Dan Olweus, who conducted research involving schoolchildren in Scandinavia in the early 1970s (Olweus, 1993). Since the original Olweus study several decades ago, there has been a rapid infiltration of computers, mobile telephones, and the internet into the routine activities and domiciles of both adults and children, dramatically expanding the reach of the offender, who had previously been limited by time and space.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Panics and Social Work: Towards a Sceptical View of UK Child Protection', Critical Social Policy, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Moral Panics and Social Work Citation for published version: Clapton, G, Cree, V & Smith, M 2013, 'Moral Panics and Social Work: Towards a Sceptical View of UK Child Protection', Critical Social Policy, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 197-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018312457860 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1177/0261018312457860 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Critical Social Policy Publisher Rights Statement: © Clapton, G., Cree, V., & Smith, M. (2013). Moral Panics and Social Work: Towards a Sceptical View of UK Child Protection. Critical Social Policy, 33(2), 197-217. 10.1177/0261018312457860 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 Moral Panics and Social Work: towards a sceptical view of UK child protection Authors Dr Gary Clapton, University of Edinburgh, Chrystal Macmillan Building, George Square, Edinburgh EH9 9LD, [email protected] Gary Clapton writes and publishes across a range of social work issues including fathers, adoption and social work education.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Panics, Victims and Exclusionary Agendas in Domestic and Cross-Borders Sex Crimes
    Women's Studies International Forum 40 (2013) 230–242 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Women's Studies International Forum journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/wsif Appropriating the rights of women: Moral panics, victims and exclusionary agendas in domestic and cross-borders sex crimes Selda Dagistanli a,⁎, Sanja Milivojevic b a School of Social Sciences and Psychology, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia b School of Social Sciences, Morven Brown Building Room G44, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia article info Synopsis Available online 27 September 2013 In this article we focus on moral panic driven publicity and policy surrounding female victims of sexual assault and sex trafficking in Australian and international contexts. The case studies comprise a series of racialised gang rapes in Sydney, Australia between 2000 and 2004, and anti-sex trafficking campaigns around major sporting events including the 2006 World Cup in Germany and 2012 London Olympics. While heightened public awareness around the sexual victimisation of women is welcome, we also critique the sort of attention that these cases and their victims receive, questioning whether increased publicity and knee-jerk policies around certain sex crimes is genuinely based on the realities of women's victimisation. We seek to demonstrate that moral panic driven attention for victims neither eases their suffering nor necessarily bolsters their rights while interrogating who does come to benefit from such “feminist”
    [Show full text]
  • Child Grooming and Sexual Exploitation: Are South Asian Men the UK Media’S New Folk Devils?
    www.crimejusticejournal.com IJCJ&SD 2015 4(2): 34-49 ISSN 2202–8005 Child Grooming and Sexual Exploitation: Are South Asian Men the UK Media’s New Folk Devils? Aisha K Gill University of Roehampton, UK Karen Harrison University of Hull, UK Abstract In May 2012, nine men from the Rochdale area of Manchester were found guilty of sexually exploiting a number of underage girls. Media reporting on the trial focused on the fact that eight of the men were of Pakistani descent, while all the girls were white. Framing similar cases in Preston, Rotherham, Derby, Shropshire, Oxford, Telford and Middlesbrough as ethnically motivated, the media incited moral panic over South Asian grooming gangs preying on white girls. While these cases shed light on the broader problem of sexual exploitation in Britain, they also reveal continuing misconceptions that stereotype South Asian men as ‘natural’ perpetrators of these crimes due to culturally-specific notions of hegemonic masculinity. Examining newspaper coverage from 2012 to 2013, this article discusses the discourse of the British media’s portrayal of South Asian men as perpetrators of sexual violence against white victims, inadvertently construing ‘South Asian men’ as ‘folk devils’. Keywords Folk devils; masculinity; media representations; moral panic; sexual exploitation; South Asian men. Introduction Over the last four years, the United Kingdom (UK) has been beset by a moral panic concerning ‘South Asian men’ grooming white girls for sexual exploitation. This moral panic derived from a number of well-publicised cases, the most infamous of which took place in Rochdale, Greater Manchester. Here, a group of nine men, eight of Pakistani origin or descent, preyed on under- aged white girls for sex before trafficking them for prostitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Us to Fear the Violent Video Game Moral Panic and the Politics of Game Research • Patrick M
    Teaching Us to Fear The Violent Video Game Moral Panic and the Politics of Game Research • Patrick M. Markey and Christopher J. Ferguson In this excerpt from their new book, Moral Combat: Why the War on Violent Video Games Is Wrong (BenBella Books, 2017), the authors present an argu- ment in defense of video games while dispelling the myth that such games lead to real-world violence. The authors define and examine moral panics and provide guidelines for identifying and understanding this phenomenon. They focus in particular on how the moral panic around video games has affected scientific research on games. Key words: gaming, moral panic, video game research; video games, video game violence; Back in 2005, at the height of the Second Gulf War, U.S. Senator Hillary Clin- ton held a press conference to focus national attention on the scourge that was putting so many of our nation’s youth at risk: violent video games. Along with senators Joseph Lieberman, Tim Johnson, and Evan Bayh, Clinton introduced the Family Entertainment Protection Act, a law that would have put the teeth of federal enforcement behind the existing Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB) classification of video game content. While the age guidelines associated with these ratings were already enforced by major retailers—who were obviously invested in maintaining their family-friendly images—doing so was technically voluntary. The proposed bill would have changed all that: any retailer who sold an M-rated game (similar to an R-rated movie) to a minor would have faced fines and community service. “It is almost routine in popular games for players to spray other people with Uzis, to drive over pedestrians, to kill police officers, to attack women, and in some cases even to engage in cannibalism,” said Clinton.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Panic Over Youth Violence
    YOUTH & SOCIETY / SEPTEMBER 2002 Welch et al. / WILDING MORALPANIC OVER YOUTH VIOLENCE: Wilding and the Manufacture of Menace in the Media MICHAEL WELCH ERIC A. PRICE NANA YANKEY Rutgers University In 1989, while reporting the well-publicized attack on a female jogger in New York City, the media discovered wilding, a newly stylized word used to describe sexual vio- lence committed by a group of urban teens. Sociologically, the term wilding became particularly significant due to its racial connotation, perpetuating a stereotype of young Black (and Latino) males belonging to a dangerous class. This work explores the contours of moral panic over wilding by attending to elements of race, class, and fear of crime, especially as they manifest in the media. The findings contribute to a critical understanding of youth in society by offering an interpretation of wilding, a distinctive form of moral panic that symbolizes not only a threat to society at large but also to a political economy that reproduces racial and social disparities. As a conceptual framework, moral panic has improved our under- standing of the social construction of crime, particularly those forms of lawlessness perceived as being new: for example, mugging (Hall, Critcher, Jefferson, Clarke, & Roberts, 1978), crack babies (Humphries, 1999), crank (i.e., methamphetamine or “speed”) (Jenkins, 1994a), freeway violence (Best, 1991, 1999), and superpredators (Brown- stein, 1996, 2000; also see Aceland, 1995; Glassner, 1999).1 Whereas Jock Youngis credited with the first use of the term in 1971, the idea of moral panic developed rapidly in the work of Stanley Cohen who of- fered its enduring definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Schools: Challenges to Moral Panic and Risk Society Theories: the Politics of National School Educational Policy
    Discourse Journal of Educational Research www.resjournals.org/IJER ISSN: 2346-7045 Vol. 3(2): 15-24, July, 2016 Safe Schools: Challenges to Moral Panic and Risk Society Theories: The Politics of National School Educational Policy Grant Rodwell Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania Abstract With the advent of the Australian National Curriculum and risk society, moral panics associated with school education moved to a higher level. The 2016 Safe Schools moral panic well illustrated this, it also showing the extent the Christian Right has followed these developments, through its traditional leverage on school education policy, to now reaching into the Prime Minister’s office. With the Safe Schools moral panic, the Australian school curriculum reached new levels of politicisation, at the same time providing fresh insights into the interplay of school education curriculum, moral panic theory and risk society theory. Keywords: Safe Schools, moral panic theory, homophobia, anti-bullying curriculum, national curriculum. INTRODUCTION In what may be the first instance of a national moral panic in school education, for several months early in 2016 the moral panic of the Safe Schools ‗superstorm‘ swept Australian schools and school communities, through to Prime Minister Turnbull‘s office. Its significance lies in that it was one of the first moral panics connected to the Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority (ACARA). For this reason, it deserves the descriptive metaphor of ‗superstorm‘. In what was one of many national news bites, ABC News on 22 March 2016 reported a controversy on its Q and A program: A student who identifies himself as queer has made an impassioned plea for politicians to stop using ‗in-pain children as political bullets‘ and stand up for the Safe Schools anti-bullying program, sparking a heated debate on the QandA panel.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Reasons for the Denial of the Existence of Ritual Abuse in the United Kingdom
    www.crimejusticejournal.com IJCJ&SD 2015 4(2): 77‐93 ISSN 2202–8005 Dissecting Disbelief: Possible Reasons for the Denial of the Existence of Ritual Abuse in the United Kingdom Kate Richardson Researcher in Child Abuse and Exploitation, United Kingdom Abstract When allegations of ritual abuse first came to light in the UK, they were met primarily with a ‘discourse of disbelief’ that left little room for the possibility accounts could be based in genuine experience. Despite convictions, recent criminological, sociological and psychological literature appears fixed on debunking ritual abuse’s existence through highly debated concepts such as ‘false memory’. This paper proposes three broad ‘reasons’ for the creation and maintenance of disbelief around ritual abuse, highlighting the importance of key cases in shaping press coverage of the issue during the 1980s and 1990s, and the role survivor advocates have played in distancing ritual abuse from established knowledge within both psychology and child protection. I argue that the tangibility of death and abject horror within survivor accounts, as well as the perceived religious motivations of perpetrators, make ritual abuse both experientially and conceptually alien to most members of late‐modern societies. Keywords Ritual abuse; organised abuse; child protection; Cleveland; McMartin. Introduction One of the more common experiences that unites survivors of child abuse is that of having one’s abusive history denied, disbelieved or minimised; indeed, feminist research has long documented the public silencing of women and children’s disclosures of abuse and exploitation (Hlavka 2014). For survivors of ritual abuse, whose abusive experiences are routinely classified as ‘false memories’ and for whom validating and informed professional support is sparse, this silence has been particularly deafening.
    [Show full text]