DOCSLIB.ORG

Thermal Structure and Exhumation History of the Lesser Himalaya in Central Nepal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thermal Structure and Exhumation History of the Lesser Himalaya in Central Nepal TECTONICS, VOL. 23, TC5015, doi:10.1029/2003TC001564, 2004 Thermal structure and exhumation history of the Lesser Himalaya in central Nepal L. Bollinger,1,2 J. P. Avouac,1,2 O. Beyssac,3 E. J. Catlos,4 T. M. Harrison,4 M. Grove,4 B. Goffe´,3 and S. Sapkota5 Received 20 July 2003; revised 15 July 2004; accepted 19 July 2004; published 20 October 2004. 2 [1] The Lesser Himalaya (LH) consists of of up to 150 m /yr of LH rocks into the Himalayan metasedimentary rocks that have been scrapped off orogenic wedge. The steep inverse thermal gradient from the underthrusting Indian crust and accreted to across the LH is interpreted to have resulted from a the mountain range over the last 20 Myr. It now combination of underplating and post metamorphic forms a significant fraction of the Himalayan shearing of the underplated units. INDEX TERMS: 8102 collisional orogen. We document the kinematics and Tectonophysics: Continental contractional orogenic belts; 8122 thermal metamorphism associated with the Tectonophysics: Dynamics, gravity and tectonics; 9320 Information deformation and exhumation of the LH, combining Related to Geographic Region: Asia; KEYWORDS: Himalaya, thermometric and thermochronological methods with thermal structure, underplating, duplex, metamorphism, structural geology. Peak metamorphic temperatures thermochronology. Citation: Bollinger,L.,J.P.Avouac, estimated from Raman spectroscopy of carbonaceous O. Beyssac, E. J. Catlos, T. M. Harrison, M. Grove, B. Goffe´, and materialdecreasegraduallyfrom520°–550°Cbelowthe S. Sapkota (2004), Thermal structure and exhumation history of the Lesser Himalaya in central Nepal, Tectonics, 23, Main Central Thrust zone down to less than 330°C. TC5015, doi:10.1029/2003TC001564. These temperatures describe structurally a 20°– 50°C/km inverted apparent gradient. The Ar muscovite ages from LH samples and from the overlying crystalline thrust sheets all indicate the 1. Introduction same regular trend; i.e., an increase from about 3– 4Manear the front of the high range to about 20 Ma near [2] As early as the mid-nineteenth century, field geolo- the leading edge of the thrust sheets, about 80 km to the gists noticed the upward increase of metamorphic grade south. This suggests that the LH has been exhumed across the Himalaya [Mallet, 1874; Medlicott, 1864; jointly with the overlying nappes as a result of Oldham, 1883]. A number of field studies have since documented this apparently inverted gradient together with overthrusting by about 5 mm/yr. For a convergence the structural architecture of the range [e.g., Hodges et al., rate of about 20 mm/yr, this implies underthrusting of 1996; Peˆcher, 1975; Stephenson et al., 2000]. The inverted the Indian basement below the Himalaya by about gradient is most obvious within and close to the Main 15 mm/yr. The structure, metamorphic grade and Central Thrust (MCT) zone which marks the contact exhumation history of the LH supports the view that, between the High Himalayan Crystalline units (HHC) and since the mid-Miocene, the Himalayan orogen has the Lesser Himalaya (LH). Metamorphic grade increases essentially grown by underplating, rather than by upward from chlorite, to biotite, garnet, kyanite and frontal accretion. This process has resulted from sillimanite-grade rocks over a structural distance of a few duplexing at a depth close to the brittle-ductile kilometers [e.g., Peˆcher, 1989]. This observation has been transition zone, by southward migration of a interpreted either as evidence for a thermal structure with midcrustal ramp along the Main Himalayan Thrust recumbent isotherms [e.g., Le Fort, 1975], or as the result of postmetamorphic shearing of isograds [e.g., Brunel et al., fault, and is estimated to have resulted in a net flux 1979; Hubbard, 1996] and has stimulated a variety of thermal modeling [Harrison et al., 1998; Henry et al., 1997; Jaupart and Provost, 1985; Molnar and 1Laboratoire De´tection et Ge´ophysique, Commissariat a` l’Energie England, 1990; Royden, 1993]. The exhumation Atomique, Bruye`res le Chaˆtel, France. history of the crystalline nappes in the study area was 2Also at Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA. also studied by various authors [Arita et al., 1997; 3Ecole Normale Supe´rieure, Laboratoire de Ge´ologie, Paris, France. Macfarlane et al., 1992; P. Copeland, personal communi- 4Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, cation]. By contrast, the metamorphic and exhumation Los Angeles, California, USA. history of the Lesser Himalaya remains poorly documented 5Department of Mines and Geology, National Seismic Center, Lainchur, Kathmandu, Nepal. mainly because of the poor mineralogy of these rocks and their supposed low metamorphic grade. However, this Copyright 2004 by the American Geophysical Union. information is critical to test models of mountain building 0278-7407/04/2003TC001564$12.00 in the Himalayas. Indeed, the LH thrust sheets form the TC5015 1of19 TC5015 BOLLINGER ET AL.: THERMAL STRUCTURE OF THE LESSER HIMALAYA TC5015 Figure 1. (a) Simplified geological map of Nepal with location of study area (box) shown in Figure 2 and of cross section AA0 (Figure 1b). (b) N018°E geological section across the Himalaya of west central Nepal. Abbreviations are as follows: DKl, Dadeldhura klippe; JKl, Jajarkot klippe; KKl, Kathmandu klippe; MFT, Main Frontal Thrust fault; MBT, Main Boundary Thrust fault; MCT, Main Central Thrust fault. All these faults are thought to sole into a basal thrust fault called here the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT), which would correspond with the midcrustal reflector imaged below southern Tibet from the INDEPTH experiment [Hauck et al., 1998]. bulk of the Himalayan wedge that have been accreted to times, would have grown primarily by underplating near the the range over the last 10 Myr as suggested from brittle-ductile transition. structural and sedimentological investigations [DeCelles et al., 2000; Huyghe et al., 2001; Robinson et al., 2001; Schelling and Arita, 1991]. 2. Geological Setting [3] In this paper we focus our effort on the LH, most 2.1. Key Structural Features Across the Himalaya of specifically in the area of central Nepal, west of Kath- West Central Nepal mandu. To document the thermal structure, we take advan- tage of new temperature data obtained from the degree of [4] To the first order, the Himalaya has resulted from graphitization of carbonaceous material [Beyssac et al., crustal-scale thrusting on a few major thrust faults 2004], a technique which was found to be particularly (Figure 1). From north to south, the Main Central Thrust appropriate in the case of LH. We analyze these data in fault (MCT), the Main Boundary Thrust fault (MBT) and view of their structural setting, together with 40Ar/39Ar the Main Frontal Thrust fault (MFT) are thought to be cooling ages determined for white micas. We show that activated following a forward propagation sequence [e.g., these data can be interpreted from a kinematic model Gansser, 1964; Le Fort, 1975]. At present, deformation is according to which the Himalaya, since the late Miocene chiefly accommodated by thrusting along a major thrust 2of19 TC5015 BOLLINGER ET AL.: THERMAL STRUCTURE OF THE LESSER HIMALAYA TC5015 fault, the Main Himalayan thrust (MHT) that connects the Himalaya, the Pokhara-Gorkha anticlinorium [Peˆcher, MFT to a subhorizontal shear zone below the high range 1989], that cropped out to the surface between 5 and and southern Tibet [e.g., Lave´ and Avouac, 2000, 2001]. 11 Ma, as indicated from various geochemical indicators The MCT marks the contact between the High Himalayan of sediment provenance sampled in the Siwaliks [DeCelles crystalline units (HHC) and the Lesser Himalaya (LH). This et al., 2000; Huyghe et al., 2001; Meigs et al., 1995; major broad shear zone is thought to have been active Najman and Garzanti, 2000; Parrish and Hodges, 1996; approximately from 22 Ma [Coleman and Hodges, 1998; Robinson et al., 2001]. This structure has been interpreted Hodges et al.,1996]to4–8Ma[Catlos et al.,2001; as a hinterland dipping duplex [Brunel, 1986] and has Harrison et al., 1997]. On the basis of geomorphic criterion, been recognized on all sections across the Himalayas in namely the steepness of the front of the high range and Nepal. Some relatively detailed structural models of river knickpoints, and evidence for brittle deformation the duplex geometry have been derived from balancing posterior to the ductile fabric, some authors have suggested crustal-scale sections [DeCelles et al., 2001; Schelling and it might even be still active at places [e.g., Hodges et al., Arita, 1991]. The schists and phyllites of the LH show a 2004]. well-developed foliation and abundant microscale and [5] The deep structure of the crust beneath the High mesoscale folding, attesting to significant deformation by Himalaya has been investigated via reflection seismologic pure shear, a mechanism inconsistent with the geometric experiments [Alsdorf et al., 1998; Hauck et al., 1998; rules used to balance a cross section. The details of these Makovsky et al., 1996], gravimetry [Cattin et al., 2001; geometric and kinematic models may therefore be ques- Lyon-Caen and Molnar, 1985], magnetotelluric sounding tioned, but we believe the broad-scale structural geometry [Lemonnier et al., 1999], and through seismic reflection must imply some sort of duplex structure as depicted in the and oil well logs in the most frontal parts of the system section across west central Nepal (Figure 1b). Some lateral [Powers et al., 1998]. Together with the surface geology (E-W) variations in the geometry and degree of development investigations and balanced cross-section modeling of this duplex are suggested from the lateral succession of [DeCelles et al., 2001; Peˆcher, 1989; Schelling and Arita, HHC klippes and LH windows (Figures 1a and 2). 1991], these data suggest that the major thrust faults splay from the MHT, the main feature separating the Himalayan orogenic wedge from the underthrusting Indian plate 2.2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Re-Look at the Himalayan Metamorphism
    Article 369 by Naresh Chandra Pant1*, Preeti Singh1 and A.K. Jain2 A Re-look at the Himalayan metamorphism 1Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi-11007; *E-mail: [email protected] 2CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee-247667 (Received : 15/04/2019; Revised accepted : 07/08/2019) https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020023 Regional metamorphic rocks preserve records of are those which were autochthonous. Khondalites in the Eastern geodynamic evolution of orogenic belts. The Himalaya Ghats Mobile Belt (EGMB) and Alwar and Ajabgarh metasediments in the Delhi Fold Belt illustrate this observation. Other than the UHP represents an evolving mountain belt with a complex eclogite assemblages, there appears to be very scanty report of the geological history and is considered here as a composite Himalayan or Tethys basin rocks metamorphosed during the of Trans–Himalaya and the Himalaya per se and the Himalayan orogeny. intervening Indus–Tsangpo Suture Zone. Each of these A view also exists that there was significant early Paleozoic three tectonic domains is evaluated in the context of their tectonism in the Himalaya (Gansser, 1964; LeFort, 1983; Thakur, 1993; Valdiya, 1995; Srikantia and Bhargava, 1983 ). Considering metamorphic evolution. An episodic evolution is inferred early Paleozoic deformation of the Cambro-Ordovician granites and described. The beginning of the Himalayan orogeny (Stocklin, 1980) in Nepal, regional metamorphism of Greater is ascribed to the Cretaceous initiation of the suturing Himalayan rocks (e.g. deformation of metapelites hosting the 488Ma of the ‘island arc’ rocks with the Asian block, followed Kinnaur Kailash granite, Marquer et al. 2000; Chawla et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Tour (Dhulikhel/Namo Buddha/Balthali) – 03 Days
    NEPAL TOUR (DHULIKHEL/NAMO BUDDHA/BALTHALI) – 03 DAYS Dhulikhel is situated only 30 Km East of Kathmandu, the capital of Nepal on the Araniko Highway in the lap of Greenwood and at an elevation of 1,550 meter above the mean sea level and along the ridge that separates the valley of Banepa and Panchkhal. It looks as if Dhulikhel is busy in conversation with the Himalayan range on the north with a beautiful smile. This might be the reason why many people call this place as the 'Queen of the Hills', and say that this place shares many features with Darjeeling a tourist city in India. From Dhulikhel one can get a panoramic view of the Himalayas from east to west. Your day at Dhulikhel may begin through witnessing the spectacular sunrise over the some of the greatest peaks of the world, including Gauri Shanker, Langtang, and Ganesh Himal. Namo Buddha is situated at the elevation of 1750m above sea level and located 40 kilometers southeast of Kathmandu (approx 1 hr 30 minutes drive from Kathmandu by private vehicle). Namo Buddha is one of the most important Buddhist pilgrimage sites south of the Himalayas, as well as being one of the holiest Buddhist sites in the world. Known by Tibetans as Takmo Lu Jin, meaning “Tigress Body Generosity”, the Namo Buddha stupa marks the site where a young prince (in some versions, the Buddha himself) encountered a tigress close to starvation and unable to feed her own cubs. Overcome with compassion, the prince allowed the tigress to consume him and thereby feed her cubs.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Folding of Fluvial Terraces Across the Siwaliks Hills
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 105, NO. B3, PAGES 5735–5770, MARCH 10, 2000 Active folding of fluvial terraces across the Siwaliks Hills, Himalayas of central Nepal J. Lave´1 and J. P. Avouac Laboratoire de Ge´ophysique, Commissariat` a l’Energie Atomique, Bruye`res-Le-Chaˆtel, France Abstract. We analyze geomorphic evidence of recent crustal deformation in the sub- Himalaya of central Nepal, south of the Kathmandu Basin. The Main Frontal Thrust fault (MFT), which marks the southern edge of the sub-Himalayan fold belt, is the only active structure in that area. Active fault bend folding at the MFT is quantified from structural geology and fluvial terraces along the Bagmati and Bakeya Rivers. Two major and two minor strath terraces are recognized and dated to be 9.2, 2.2, and 6.2, 3.7 calibrated (cal) kyr old, respectively. Rock uplift of up to 1.5 cm/yr is derived from river incision, accounting for sedimentation in the Gangetic plain and channel geometry changes. Rock uplift profiles are found to correlate with bedding dip angles, as expected in fault bend folding. It implies that thrusting along the MFT has absorbed 21 Ϯ 1.5 mm/yr of N-S shortening on average over the Holocene period. The Ϯ1.5 mm/yr defines the 68% confidence interval and accounts for uncertainties in age, elevation measurements, initial geometry of the deformed terraces, and seismic cycle. At the longitude of Kathmandu, localized thrusting along the Main Frontal Thrust fault must absorb most of the shortening across the Himalaya. By contrast, microseismicity and geodetic monitoring over the last decade suggest that interseismic strain is accumulating beneath the High Himalaya, 50–100 km north of the active fold zone, where the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT) fault roots into a ductile de´collement beneath southern Tibet.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Dhaulagiri-Annapurna-Manaslu Himalaya, Western Region, Nepal
    This article was downloaded by: [Virginia Tech Libraries] On: 10 December 2014, At: 05:13 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Maps Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjom20 Geology of the Dhaulagiri-Annapurna- Manaslu Himalaya, Western Region, Nepal. 1:200,000 Andrew J. Parsonsa, Richard D. Lawb, Michael P. Searlec, Richard J. Phillipsa & Geoffrey E. Lloyda a School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK b Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA c Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Published online: 09 Dec 2014. To cite this article: Andrew J. Parsons, Richard D. Law, Michael P. Searle, Richard J. Phillips & Geoffrey E. Lloyd (2014): Geology of the Dhaulagiri-Annapurna-Manaslu Himalaya, Western Region, Nepal. 1:200,000, Journal of Maps To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2014.984784 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Versions of published Taylor & Francis and Routledge Open articles and Taylor & Francis and Routledge Open Select articles posted to institutional or subject repositories or any other third-party website are without warranty from Taylor & Francis of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.
    [Show full text]
  • Foemation and Deformation of River Terraces in the Hetauda Dum, Central Nepal a Contribution to the Study of Post Siwalikan Tectonics
    Foemation and Deformation of River Terraces in the Hetauda Dum, Central Nepal A Contribution to the Study of Post Siwalikan Tectonics 著者 KIMURA Kazuo 雑誌名 The science reports of the Tohoku University. 7th series, Geography 巻 44 号 2 ページ 151-181 発行年 1994-12 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10097/45214 151 Formation and Deformation of River Terraces in the Hetauda Dun, Central Nepal A Contribution to the Study of Post Siwalikan Tectonics Kazuo KIMURA Abstract Situated on the southern fringe of the Nepal Himalayas, the longitu- dinal "dun" valley consists of polycyclic geomorphological units ; the Highest erosion surface, the Upper, Middle, Lower terraces and flood plains. The following three phases of dun valley development are recognized through geomorphological and sedimentlogical analysis. Pre-Dun phase : Older geomorphological units (the Highest surface and the Upper terraces) had developed as piedmont alluvial plains at the foot of the Lesser Himalaya. The vertical displacement of the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) contributed chiefly to the supply of alluvial fan deposits. Until this stage, the study area had faced the Gangetic Plain. Separation phase : Analysis of the Middle terraces and their deposits reveals evident relation between the upheaval of the Churia Range and palaeogeographic changes of the study area. In contrast to the older surfaces, the Middle terraces generally indicate the trend of development from south to north, and their deposits also show the trace of south-north current. This means that the generation of the Churia Range cut palaeochannels flown from the Lesser Himalaya to the Gangetic Plain, and the Hetauda Dun was closed as an intermontane basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural and Microtectonic Analyses of Barpak of Gorkha District, West-Central Nepal
    13 Journal of Nepal Geological Society, 2020, vol. 60, pp. 163-179 https://doi.org/10.3126/jngs.v60i0.31265 Structural and microtectonic analyses of Barpak of Gorkha district, west-central Nepal *Sameer Poudel1, Lok Mani Oli2 and Lalu P. Paudel1 1Central Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University, Kritipur, Kathmandu, Nepal 2Khani Khola (Dolakha) Hydropower Project, Dolakha, Janakpur, Nepal *Corresponding author’s email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Geological mapping was carried out in the Barpak-Bhachchek area of the Daraudi River valley, Gorkha district, West- Central Nepal for structural analyses. The area comprises rocks of the Higher Himalayan Crystalline and the Lesser Himalayan Sequence. Pelitic and psammitic schist, quartzite, calc-quartzite, dolomitic marble, graphitic schist, gneiss are the main rock types within the Lesser Himalayan Sequence. In contrast, banded gneiss and quartzite form a significant portion of the Higher Himalayan Crystalline. The area is affected by poly-phase deformation. The Lesser Himalayan Sequence has suffered five deformational phases (DL1-DL2, D3-D5),whereas the Higher Himalayan Crystalline has suffered four deformational events (DH1, D3-D5). Among these deformational phases, early deformational phases (DL1-DL2) of the Lesser Himalayan Sequence and (DH1) of the Higher Himalayan Crystalline are pre-Himalayan, whereas later three (D3, D4, D5) of both the Higher Himalayan Crystalline and the Lesser Himalayan Sequence are Himalayan. The Lesser Himalayan Sequence lying to the northern limb of the Gorkha-Kuncha anticlinorium is contorted into doubly plunging to dome-and-basin like en echelon type of non-cylindrical folds as Baluwa Dome and Pokhartar Basin (DL2 and D4). The direction of shearing as indicated by shear sense indicators (C' Shear band and Mica fish) is top-to-south coinciding with the regional sense of shear due to the MCT propagation.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Study of Chatara–Barahakshetra Section, Sunsari-Udayapur District, Eastern Nepal
    Bulletin of Department of Geology,Geological Tribhuvan Study University, of Chatara–Barahakshetra Kathmandu, Nepal, Section, vol. 20-21, Sunsari-Udayapur 2018, pp. 49-58. District, eastern Nepal Geological study of Chatara–Barahakshetra section, Sunsari-Udayapur District, eastern Nepal *Drona Adhikari1,2, Keshav Shrestha1, Purushottam Adhikari1,3, Khum N. Paudayal1, and Lalu Paudel1 1Central Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal 2Central Campus of Technology, Tribhuvan University, Dharan, Sunsari, Nepal 3Department of Geology, Birendra Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal ABSTRACT Geological mapping was carried out in the Chatara–Barahakshetra area of east Nepal. The Siwalik of the Chatara–Barahakshetra area is divided into the Lower Siwalik and the Middle Siwalik. Each unit is further subdivided into lower and upper members. The Central Churia Thrust is overturned in the study area. Highly deformed Siwalik contain several outcrop-scale as well as a large-scale folds. Key words: Siwalik, Central Churia Thrust, deformed, fold Received: 21 March 2018 Accepted: 19 June 2018 INTRODUCTION Siwalik in local geological formations. Dhakal (2001) and Ulak (2004) slightly modified the classification introducing Nepal Himalaya is the longest and youngest mountain members on the basis of mudstone and sandstone proportion in system of the world (Gansser 1964). The Himalayan orogen has case of the Lower Siwalik, and on presence/absence of pebbles been the place of attraction for geologists worldwide (Searle in sandstone in the Middle Siwalik of Chatara–Barahakshetra et al. 1997; Clift et al. 2002; Yin 2006; Bouilhol et al. 2013; section which has been adopted in present research work. Chatterjee et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Geology Reviews
    Regional Geology Reviews Series editors Roland Oberhänsli Maarten J. de Wit François M. Roure For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/8643 View of Mt Nilgiri from Tatopani Megh Raj Dhital Geology of the Nepal Himalaya Regional Perspective of the Classic Collided Orogen 123 Megh Raj Dhital Central Department of Geology Tribhuvan University Kirtipur, Kathmandu Nepal ISBN 978-3-319-02495-0 ISBN 978-3-319-02496-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02496-7 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014949333 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Nepal and Its Regional Frame
    J. geol. SOC. London, vol. 137, 1980, pp. 1-34, 15 figs. Printed in Northern Ireland. Geology of Nepal and its regional frame J. Stocklin Thirty-third William Smith Lecture CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 a. General background 3 b. Zonation of Nepal Himalaya 3 2. The High Himalaya 4 a. Central Crystalline zone 4 (i) Composition and stratigraphy 4 (ii) Structure 5 (iii) Metamorphism, granitization, and the basement problem 5 b. Tibetan sedimentary zone 6 (i) Stratigraphy 6 (ii) Structure 7 c. Indus-Tsangpo suture zone 7 3. The Lesser Himalaya 9 a. ‘The unpaged historic manuscript’ 9 b. Palaeontological evidence 9 c. Stratigraphical implications 11 d. The Kumaon background in western Nepal 11 (i) The sedimentary belts 11 (ii) The crystalline ‘klippen’ 13 e. The Sikkim background in eastern Nepal 13 f. New studies in Central Nepal 15 (i) General aspects 15 (ii) The Nawakot Complex 18 (iii) The Kathmandu Complex 19 (iv) Metamorphism and granitization 21 (v) Autochthony or allochthony? 22 (vi) Mahabharat Thrust and Kathmandu nappe 22 g. Reverse metamorphism and Main Central Thrust 24 h. Main Boundary Thrust, Siwalik belt, and Gangetic plain 25 4. Regional aspects 26 a. Palaeogeography 26 b. The Himalaya in the structure of Central Asia 27 c.Eurasia/Gondwana relations 30 S. References 31 SUMMARY: Since the opening of Nepal in 1950, a wealth of new information on the geology of the Himalaya has emanated from this country. The sedimentary history of the Range is mostreliably recorded in the richlyfossiliferous ‘Tethyan’ or ‘Tibetan’ zone, which extends to the N from the summit region and has revealed an epicontinental to miogeosynclinal sequence, over 10 km thick, ranging from Cambrian to Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • Ganesh Himal and Manaslu Trekking
    Xtreme Climbers Treks And Expedition Pvt Ltd Website:https://xtremeclibers.com Email:[email protected] Phone No:977 - 9801027078,977 - 9851027078 P.O.Box:9080, Kathmandu, Nepal Address: Bansbari, Kathmandu, Nepal Ganesh Himal and Manaslu Trekking Introduction Ganesh Himal Manaslu trekking introduce you to a broad spectrum of life in different Nepalese communities and beautiful scenery. Base Camp of Ganesh Himal where there are two lakes – Black and White. Twin waterfalls – Ganga and Jamuna, bring joy to your heart. March or April will be the best month to Visit this area to see the mountainsides red with magnificent Rhododendron blooms. Trail is pass through Gorkha, the birthplace of modern Nepal home of King Prithvi Narayan Shah, who fought many wars to unite the tiny kingdoms spread throughout the land now known as Nepal. This area is also the homeland of the original Gurkha warriors Ganesh himal Manaslu trekking offers an extraordinary panorama of the Ganesh Himal Massif, Manaslu, and the Langtang Range. Highlights of this journey include not only the mountain views but abundant flora and fauna, magnificent village scenery and the welcoming people of the mid-hills with their captivating customs and traditions. The best season to visit is September to November as well as February through June, and even outside of these times the spectacular attractions and relatively low elevation make it an all-season adventure. Another attraction of Ganesh Himal Manaslu trekking is Tsum Valley is a sacred Himalayan pilgrimage valley situated in a trans-Himalayan region of Gorkha. This Valley’s natural beauty and its pristine culture make this trekking unique.
    [Show full text]
  • OVERVIEW Tectonics of the Himalaya and Southern Tibet from Two Perspectives
    OVERVIEW Tectonics of the Himalaya and southern Tibet from two perspectives K. V. Hodges Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 ABSTRACT café or on the banks of a quiet pond, Impressionist art preserves an instan- taneous sensation. Claude Monet, perhaps the greatest of the Impressionists, The Himalaya and Tibet provide an unparalleled opportunity to ex- tried to go further by expressing the passage of time in his series paintings, amine the complex ways in which continents respond to collisional like those of the façade of the Rouen Cathedral. If Impressionism is a form orogenesis. This paper is an attempt to synthesize the known geology of of historical documentation, we might think of one of the great traditions of this orogenic system, with special attention paid to the tectonic evolu- tectonics research—the description of orogeny as a temporal progression of tion of the Himalaya and southernmost Tibet since India-Eurasia colli- deformational episodes—as an essentially Impressionist enterprise. Our sion at ca. 50 Ma. Two alternative perspectives are developed. The first ability to use the developmental sequence of major structures in one setting is largely historical. It includes brief (and necessarily subjective) re- to predict the sequence in others, as is the case for foreland fold-and-thrust views of the tectonic stratigraphy, the structural geology, and meta- belts worldwide (Dahlstrom, 1970), is ample testimony to the value of the morphic geology of the Himalaya. The second focuses on the processes Impressionist perspective. that dictate the behavior of the orogenic system today.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Trekking & the Great Himalaya Trail First Edition 2011, This Third Edition 2020
    Nepal-3 p1-28 colour-Q9_Prelims Template 2/20/20 4:17 PM Page 1 ROBIN BOUSTEAD (far right) first fell in love with the Himalaya in 1993 and has returned every year since. With a group of friends he conceived the idea of the most challenging trek in the world along a route encompassing the entire Himalaya from end to end. This became known as the Great Himalaya Trail (GHT). Robin began researching new trekking routes that link each of the himals in 2002. On his first full traverse of the GHT, an epic jour- ney of six months over two seasons, he lost over 20% of his body weight. He has now completed high traverses of the Indian, Bhutanese and Nepal Himalayan ranges as well as dozens of shorter treks. Author Nepal-3 p1-28 colour-Q9_Prelims Template 2/24/20 9:17 AM Page 2 Nepal Trekking & The Great Himalaya Trail First edition 2011, this third edition 2020 Publisher Trailblazer Publications : trailblazer-guides.com The Old Manse, Tower Rd, Hindhead, Surrey, GU26 6SU, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-1-912716-16-6 © Robin Boustead 2020 Text and photographs (unless otherwise credited) © Himalaya Map House & Robin Boustead 2020 Colour mapping © Trailblazer Publications 2020 B&W mapping Editor: Daniel McCrohan Series editor: Bryn Thomas Typesetting & layout: Daniel McCrohan Proofreading: Henry Stedman Colour cartography: Himalaya Map House (HMH) B&W cartography: Nick Hill Index: Daniel McCrohan Photographs: © Robin Boustead unless otherwise credited All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]