DOCSLIB.ORG

Map of Greek Wines Greek of Map

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Map of Greek Wines Greek of Map geographical indication i.e., Verdea and 15 retsinas (PGI wines of Greece). Greece). of wines (PGI retsinas 15 and Verdea i.e., indication geographical Regional Wines and any of the wines of “Traditional Designation” which, simultaneously, have an established established an have simultaneously, which, Designation” “Traditional of wines the of any and Wines Regional PGI Wines: Wines: PGI PGI products are those bearing a “Protected Geographical Indication”. This wine category comprises all all comprises category wine This Indication”. Geographical “Protected a bearing those are products PGI PGI Imathia PGI 24 PGI Pallini PGI PGI Chios PGI Kropia Retsina PGI Krania PGI 72 120 96 48 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Ilia PGI 23 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Peanea PGI PGI Chania PGI Karystos Retsina PGI Koropi PGI 71 119 95 47 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Zakynthos PGI 22 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Pangeon PGI PGI Halkidiki PGI Thebes Retsina PGI Korinthos PGI 70 118 94 46 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Evia PGI .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... 21 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................... PGI Opountia Lokrida Opountia PGI PGI Halikouna PGI Yaltra Retsina PGI Atalanti of Valley PGI 69 117 93 45 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Epanomi PGI 20 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Nea Messimvria Nea PGI PGI Florina PGI Evia Retsina PGI Kozani PGI 68 116 92 44 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Elassona PGI 19 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Metsovo PGI PGI Fthiotida PGI Viotia Retsina PGI Klimenti PGI 67 115 91 43 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Evros PGI 18 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Meteora PGI PGI Tyrnavos PGI Attiki Retsina PGI Kissamos PGI 66 114 90 42 . ............................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................... PGI Dodecanese PGI 17 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Metaxata PGI PGI Trifilia PGI Rethymno PGI Corfu PGI 65 113 89 41 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Drama PGI 16 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Messinia PGI PGI Tegea PGI Pylia PGI Kastoria PGI .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... 64 112 88 40 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Grevena PGI 15 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ............................................................................................................................... PGI Martino PGI PGI Syros PGI Petroto of Slopes PGI Karystos PGI 63 111 87 39 . ............................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................... PGI Gerania PGI 14 .. ............................................................................................................................... .. ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Entomologica 31 1997 Entomologica18/05/98
    Entomologica, Bari, 31, (1997): 13-75 MARCELA SKUHRAVA 1 - VACLAV SKUHRAVY 2 Gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) of Greece ABSTRACT The present gall midge fauna comprises 167 species which were found at 67 localities in Greece during expeditions in 1994, 1995 and 1996. In the period 1880-1993 only 20 gall midge species were recorded from Greece; 149 are new records. An annotated list of gall midge species is given. It includes collection sites together with biological and zoogeographical data. The gall midge fauna is evaluated from the point of view of zoogeography and economic importance. From 2 to 21 species were found at individual localities. The average species number per locality determined from the whole territory of Greece (including Crete) is very low, only 9.3. 35 species were found in north-eastern, 78 in north-western and 80 in the middle part; 56 species in Peloponesos and 38 species in Crete. Horizontal occurrence: 52% species are very rare, 24% rare, 9% moderately frequent, 10% frequent and only 5% occur very frequently. Dasineura turionum causing galls on stems of Asparagus acutifolius is the most abundant species in Greece found at 30 localities. Vertical occurrence: the average number of species does not decrease significantly with increasing altitude. Gall midge species composition change significantly with changing plant communities from the coast near the sea level up to mountains following the altitudinal gradient. Of the Palaearctic species, 33% are European, 12% Euro-Siberian, 50% Mediterranean and sub- Mediterranean, and 5% are Holarctic species. Nine species occurred in the past as pests of cultiva- ted plants of which Odinadiplosis amygdali is a serious pest of almond and peach up to the pre- sent.
    [Show full text]
  • Poison King: the Life and Legend of Mithradates the Great, Rome's
    Copyrighted Material Kill em All, and Let the Gods Sort em Out IN SPRING of 88 BC, in dozens of cities across Anatolia (Asia Minor, modern Turkey), sworn enemies of Rome joined a secret plot. On an appointed day in one month’s time, they vowed to kill every Roman man, woman, and child in their territories. e conspiracy was masterminded by King Mithradates the Great, who communicated secretly with numerous local leaders in Rome’s new Province of Asia. (“Asia” at this time referred to lands from the eastern Aegean to India; Rome’s Province of Asia encompassed western Turkey.) How Mithradates kept the plot secret remains one of the great intelli- gence mysteries of antiquity. e conspirators promised to round up and slay all the Romans and Italians living in their towns, including women and children and slaves of Italian descent. ey agreed to confiscate the Romans’ property and throw the bodies out to the dogs and crows. Any- one who tried to warn or protect Romans or bury their bodies was to be harshly punished. Slaves who spoke languages other than Latin would be spared, and those who joined in the killing of their masters would be rewarded. People who murdered Roman moneylenders would have their debts canceled. Bounties were offered to informers and killers of Romans in hiding.1 e deadly plot worked perfectly. According to several ancient histo- rians, at least 80,000—perhaps as many as 150,000—Roman and Italian residents of Anatolia and Aegean islands were massacred on that day. e figures are shocking—perhaps exaggerated—but not unrealistic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia
    XII. The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia by Iakovos D. Michailidis Most of the reports on Greece published by international organisations in the early 1990s spoke of the existence of 200,000 “Macedonians” in the northern part of the country. This “reasonable number”, in the words of the Greek section of the Minority Rights Group, heightened the confusion regarding the Macedonian Question and fuelled insecurity in Greece’s northern provinces.1 This in itself would be of minor importance if the authors of these reports had not insisted on citing statistics from the turn of the century to prove their points: mustering historical ethnological arguments inevitably strengthened the force of their own case and excited the interest of the historians. Tak- ing these reports as its starting-point, this present study will attempt an historical retrospective of the historiography of the early years of the century and a scientific tour d’horizon of the statistics – Greek, Slav and Western European – of that period, and thus endeavour to assess the accuracy of the arguments drawn from them. For Greece, the first three decades of the 20th century were a long period of tur- moil and change. Greek Macedonia at the end of the 1920s presented a totally different picture to that of the immediate post-Liberation period, just after the Balkan Wars. This was due on the one hand to the profound economic and social changes that followed its incorporation into Greece and on the other to the continual and extensive population shifts that marked that period. As has been noted, no fewer than 17 major population movements took place in Macedonia between 1913 and 1925.2 Of these, the most sig- nificant were the Greek-Bulgarian and the Greek-Turkish exchanges of population under the terms, respectively, of the 1919 Treaty of Neuilly and the 1923 Lausanne Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth for Social and Solidarity Economy - (YSEE)
    Youth for Social and Solidarity Economy - (YSEE) Training Course KA1 – Erasmus + project Monday 03 September 2018 (Arrival) – Monday 10 September 2018 (Departure) 6 working days, 7 nights Florina, Greece Dear friends, We are looking forward to meeting you all in Florina! Here you will find some important information for your travel arrangements and your stay in our city. Description of the project Youth for Social and Solidarity Economy is an innovative Erasmus+ project, promoting the good practices in the social and solidarity economy amongst European countries. This project aims at enhancing the mobility of youth workers and youth leaders with previous experience on social economy, future youth leaders, already active or potential social entrepreneurs who are willing to share knowledge, experiences, and good practices on the theme. Participants can further inspire the young people they are working with, to become more active on the field of social economy. Furthermore, the project aims at supporting the participants on developing business models that have the potential to solve social problems and support vulnerable groups of people. Association of Active Youths of Florina (OENEF) NGO's and Associations have major part in raising the awareness about social entrepreneurship. We wanted to gather people (youth workers, your leaders, youngsters with entrepreneurial spirit) to start to work on the topic of social entrepreneurship. We want to match people with same interest and work together on something concrete - international platform where in future will be provided information about the social entrepreneurship. The aim of the project is: to ensure an entrepreneurial approach to solving social and environmental problems in the countries part of the project and to encourage and support the development of a new generation of social entrepreneurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Spending on Regional Public Services in Greece: Spatial Distribution of Their Evolution Before and During the Financial Crisis
    Government spending on regional public services in Greece: Spatial distribution of their evolution before and during the financial crisis. Anastasiou Eugenia1,*, Theodossiou George2, Thanou Eleni3 1 PhD Candidate, Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly, Greece 2Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, TEI of Thessaly 3Lecturer, Graduate Program on Banking, Hellenic Open University *Corresponding author: [email protected], Tel +30 24210 74433 Abstract Greece is still caught in a prolonged recession, which started in 2008. As a result, the economy continues to shrink, which has direct repercussions on the level of private and public consumption as well as on the level government's functions. The present paper attempts to record and depict spatially the evolution of the per capita public spending of the central government on regional services. The specific category of public spending represents a measure of relative welfare as well as a measure of regional development. For the purposes of the research we applied analytical methods such as descriptive statistics and we used specialized mapping analysis programs and geographical information systems (GIS). The evolution over time is observed on the basis of the annual percentage changes of per capita spending. The period of analysis is 2008-2013 and it includes years before the manifestation of the economic crisis as well as the years of the crisis' peak. The thematic maps that were constructed on the basis of the data clearly demonstrate that government spending on the regions was dramatically reduced during the crisis while the period during which the tightening of fiscal policy had a direct impact on the regions stands out.
    [Show full text]
  • Demetrius Poliorcetes and the Hellenic League
    DEMETRIUSPOLIORCETES AND THE HELLENIC LEAGUE (PLATE 33) 1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND D JURING the six years, 307/6-302/1 B.C., issues were raised and settled which shaped the course of western history for a long time to come. The epoch was alike critical for Athens, Hellas, and the Macedonians. The Macedonians faced squarely during this period the decision whether their world was to be one world or an aggregate of separate kingdoms with conflicting interests, and ill-defined boundaries, preserved by a precarious balance of power and incapable of common action against uprisings of Greek and oriental subjects and the plundering appetites of surrounding barbarians. The champion of unity was King Antigonus the One- Eyed, and his chief lieutenant his brilliant but unstatesmanlike son, King Demetrius the Taker of Cities, a master of siege operations and of naval construction and tactics, more skilled in organizing the land-instruments of warfare than in using them on the battle field. The final campaign between the champions of Macedonian unity and disunity opened in 307 with the liberation of Athens by Demetrius and ended in 301 B.C. with the Battle of the Kings, when Antigonus died in a hail of javelins and Demetrius' cavalry failed to penetrate a corps of 500 Indian elephants in a vain effort to rescue hinm. Of his four adversaries King Lysimachus and King Kassander left no successors; the other two, Kings Ptolemy of Egypt and Seleucus of Syria, were more fortunate, and they and Demetrius' able son, Antigonus Gonatas, planted the three dynasties with whom the Romans dealt and whom they successively destroyed in wars spread over 44 years.
    [Show full text]
  • ANASTASIOS GEORGOTAS “Archaeological Tourism in Greece
    UNIVERSITY OF THE PELOPONNESE ANASTASIOS GEORGOTAS (R.N. 1012201502004) DIPLOMA THESIS: “Archaeological tourism in Greece: an analysis of quantitative data, determining factors and prospects” SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: - Assoc. Prof. Nikos Zacharias - Dr. Aphrodite Kamara EXAMINATION COMMITTEE: - Assoc. Prof. Nikolaos Zacharias - Dr. Aphrodite Kamara - Dr. Nikolaos Platis ΚΑΛΑΜΑΤΑ, MARCH 2017 Abstract . For many decades now, Greece has invested a lot in tourism which can undoubtedly be considered the country’s most valuable asset and “heavy industry”. The country is gifted with a rich and diverse history, represented by a variety of cultural heritage sites which create an ideal setting for this particular type of tourism. Moreover, the variations in Greece’s landscape, cultural tradition and agricultural activity favor the development and promotion of most types of alternative types of tourism, such as agro-tourism, religious, sports and medicinal tourism. However, according to quantitative data from the Hellenic Statistical Authority, despite the large number of visitors recorded in state-run cultural heritage sites every year, the distribution pattern of visitors presents large variations per prefecture. A careful examination of this data shows that tourist flows tend to concentrate in certain prefectures, while others enjoy little to no visitor preference. The main factors behind this phenomenon include the number and importance of cultural heritage sites and the state of local and national infrastructure, which determines the accessibility of sites. An effective analysis of these deficiencies is vital in order to determine solutions in order to encourage the flow of visitors to the more “neglected” areas. The present thesis attempts an in-depth analysis of cultural tourism in Greece and the factors affecting it.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaic Eretria
    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • D6.4 Case Study D
    Grant Agreement Number: INEA/CEF/TRAN/M2018/179967 Project acronym: SLAIN Project full title: Saving Lives Assessing and Improving TEN-T Road Network Safety D. 1.0 Due delivery date: 31st March 2021 Actual delivery date: 13th March 2021 Organisation name of lead participant for this deliverable: RSI ‘Panos Mylonas’ D6.4: Activity 6 case studies group D Co-financed by the Connecting Europe Facility of the European Union SLAIN 1 V1.3 Document Control Sheet Version Input by Consortium partners History V1.0 Version for submission to INEA Legal Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The above referenced consortium members shall have no liability for damages of any kind including without limitation direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages that may result from the use of these materials subject to any liability which is mandatory due to applicable law. © 2020 by SLAIN Consortium. Acknowledgement The SLAIN beneficiaries are grateful to EuroRAP and iRAP for the research information provided. The report was coordinated and prepared by RSI Panos Mylonas, supported by iRAP and the Road Safety Foundation, with liaison with INEA by the project coordinator EuroRAP. Individual project partners provided the case studies. Abbreviations and Acronyms Acronym Abreviation SLAIN Saving Lives Assessing and Improving Network Safety TEN-T Trans-European Network - Transport GIS Geographic Information System SRIP Safer Roads Investment Plans RSA Road Safety Audit RSI Road Safety Inspection SLAIN 2 Version 1.0 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 SLAIN project objectives ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • European Court of Human Rights Examines Living Conditions in Hotspots Moria, Pyli & Vial
    This project has been supported by the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM), a collaborative initiative of the Network of European Foundations (NEF). The sole responsibility for the project lies with the organiser(s) and the content may not necessarily reflect the positions of EPIM, NEF or EPIM’s Partner Foundations. For immediate release EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS EXAMINES LIVING CONDITIONS IN HOTSPOTS MORIA, PYLI & VIAL Chios, Kos & Lesvos, January 20, 2021 While the situation on the East Aegean islands received particular attention after the outbreak of the fire in Moria, it has subsided more recently. At the same time, living conditions on the islands continue to be catastrophic. People have little access to medical care, wash facilities, and proper shelter, and are regularly forced to sleep in tents that flood easily in the winter rains. Particularly vulnerable people are not exempt from these conditions. Even in times when the Covid-19 was and is on the verge of an outbreak in the camps, members of at-risk groups continue to live exposed to these conditions without protection. The European Court of Human Rights has now asked the Greek government questions regarding the treatment of a total of eight people, all of whom were living in one of the so-called EU hotspots and had pre-existing medical conditions or were particularly vulnerable. In total, the Court connected 8 cases involving Chios, Kos, Lesvos and Samos, i.e. 4 out of 5 EU hotspots. These cases therefore demonstrate the structural illegality and impossibility to implement the hotspot approach and border procedures in a way that does not violate human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Tidal Triggering on the Shallow Earthquakes of the Seismic Area of Mygdonia Basin, North Greece, in Terrestrial and Stellar Environment, Eds
    Variation of the Earth tide-seismicity compliance parameter during the recent seismic activity of Fthiotida, Greece Arabelos D.N., Contadakis, M.E., Vergos, G. and S.D. Spatalas Department of Geodesy and Surveying, University of Thessaloniki, Greece Abstract: Based on the results of our studies for the tidal triggering effect on the seismicity of the Hellenic area, we consider the confidence level of earthquake occurrence - tidal period accordance as an index of tectonic stress criticality for earthquake occurrence and we check if the recent increase in the seismic activity at Fthiotida in Greek Mainland indicate faulting maturity for a stronger earthquake. In this paper we present the results of this test. Key words: Earthtides, Seismicity, Hi(stogram)Cum(ulation) method 1. Introduction Applying the Hi(stogram)Cum(ulation) method, which was introduced recently by Cadicheanu, van Ruymbecke and Zhu (2007), we analyze the series of the earthquakes occurred in the last 50 years in seismic active areas of Greece, i.e. the areas (a) of the Mygdonian Basin(Contadakis et al. 2007), (b) of the Ionian Islands (Contadakis et al. 2012), (c) of the Hellenic Arc (Vergos et al. 2012) and (d) Santorini (Contadakis et al. 2013). The result of the analysis for all the areas indicate that the monthly variation of the frequencies of earthquake occurrence is in accordance with the period of the tidal lunar monthly and semi-monthly (Mm and Mf) variations and the same happens with the corresponding daily variations of the frequencies of earthquake occurrence with the diurnal luni-solar (K1) and semidiurnal lunar (M2) tidal variations.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021
    GREECE • CRETE • TURKEY MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 Tour Hosts: Dr. Scott Moore Dr. Jason Whitlark organized by GREECE - CRETE - TURKEY / May 28 - June 22, 2021 May 31 Mon ATHENS - CORINTH CANAL - CORINTH – ACROCORINTH - NAFPLION At 8:30a.m. depart from Athens and drive along the coastal highway of Saronic Gulf. Arrive at the Corinth Canal for a brief stop and then continue on to the Acropolis of Corinth. Acro-corinth is the citadel of Corinth. It is situated to the southwest of the ancient city and rises to an elevation of 1883 ft. [574 m.]. Today it is surrounded by walls that are about 1.85 mi. [3 km.] long. The foundations of the fortifications are ancient—going back to the Hellenistic Period. The current walls were built and rebuilt by the Byzantines, Franks, Venetians, and Ottoman Turks. Climb up and visit the fortress. Then proceed to the Ancient city of Corinth. It was to this megalopolis where the apostle Paul came and worked, established a thriving church, subsequently sending two of his epistles now part of the New Testament. Here, we see all of the sites associated with his ministry: the Agora, the Temple of Apollo, the Roman Odeon, the Bema and Gallio’s Seat. The small local archaeological museum here is an absolute must! In Romans 16:23 Paul mentions his friend Erastus and • • we will see an inscription to him at the site. In the afternoon we will drive to GREECE CRETE TURKEY Nafplion for check-in at hotel followed by dinner and overnight. (B,D) MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 June 1 Tue EPIDAURAUS - MYCENAE - NAFPLION Morning visit to Mycenae where we see the remains of the prehistoric citadel Parthenon, fortified with the Cyclopean Walls, the Lionesses’ Gate, the remains of the Athens Mycenaean Palace and the Tomb of King Agamemnon in which we will actually enter.
    [Show full text]