Weather Support for the 2002 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mega-Sporting Events in Developing Nations: Playing The
MEGA-SPORTING EVENTS IN DEVELOPING NATIONS: PLAYING THE WAY TO PROSPERITY? Victor A. Matheson and Robert A. Baade Department of Economics Department of Economics and Business Williams College Lake Forest College Fernald House, 34 Sawyer Library Dr. 555 N. Sheridan Rd. Williamstown, MA 01267 Lake Forest, IL 60045 (847) 597-2144 (phone) (847) 735-5136 (phone) (847) 597-4045 (fax) (847) 735-6193 (fax) Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Note: This paper is a draft version and should be considered preliminary and incomplete. Do not cite or quote without the permission of the authors. ABSTRACT Supporters of mega-sporting events such as the World Cup and Olympics claim that these events attract hoards of wealthy visitors and lead to lasting economic benefits for the host regions. For this reason, cities and countries compete vigorously for the right to stage these spectacles. Recently, developing countries have become increasingly vocal in demanding that they get the right to share in the economic benefits of these international games. China, for example, has been awarded the 2008 Summer Olympics, and an African nation seems destined to host the 2010 World Cup. The specialized infrastructure and operating expenses required to host these events, however, can be extremely costly, and it is not at all clear that either the long or short-term benefits of the games are anywhere nearly large enough to cover these costs. This paper reviews other researchers’ as well as our own previous work on mega-sporting events such as the Super Bowl and World Series as well as international events like the World Cup and Olympics. -
Summit County Request for Proposals Electronic Television Equipment Professional Maintenance Technitian
SUMMIT COUNTY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ELECTRONIC TELEVISION EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL MAINTENANCE TECHNITIAN Proposals Due: FRIDAY, April 16, 2021 by 5:00 PM. SUMMIT COUNTY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ELECTRONIC TELEVISION EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL MAINTENANCE TECHNITIAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1: Overview and Instructions 1.1 Purpose of the RFP 1.2 Projected Schedule for the RFP Process 1.3 Submission Guidelines Part 2: Scope of Work and Requirements 2.1 Background 2.2 Scope of Work and Tasks to be Completed 2.3 Length of Agreement 2.4 Payment 2.5 Insurance Requirements 2.6 Submission Requirements Part 3: Response Evaluation and Notice to Proposers 3.1 Evaluation and Scoring Criteria 3.2 Written Agreement Required 3.3 Notice to Proposers ATTACHMENT A: SUMMIT COUNTY SERVICE PROVIDER/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Date of Issue: 03/26/2021 Date of Amendment: None SUMMIT COUNTY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ELECTRONIC TELEVISION EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL MAINTENANCE TECHNITIAN Part 1: Overview and Instructions 1.1 Purpose of the RFP Summit County, “County” is soliciting proposals from qualified individuals (Proposer/Contractor) to act as a Television Maintenance Technician (Technician) within the county. This person shall be contracted at the pleasure of the county executive and is considered an independent contractor subject to terms of a contract. The Technician’s responsibility includes complete maintenance program for the County’s television translator system and other related electronic equipment in accordance with generally accepted electronic engineering procedures and practices and rules and regulations of the FCC. Maintenance shall include all necessary labor, test equipment, and transportation needed to service, repair, adjust, and/or replace translators, antenna, wiring, filters, and other related electronic equipment. -
The Impact of the Olympic Games on Employment Growth: A
The Impact of the Olympic Games on Employment Growth: A Synthetic Control Approach Candon Johnson* West Virginia University June 22, 2020 Abstract The Olympics Games stand as the largest sporting event in the world. The Games include approximately 200 countries during the Summer Olympic Games and 90 countries competing in the Winter Games, each occurring once every four years. Potential host cities fiercely compete to host the games under the guise of economic prosperity. Event promoters claim substantial economic benefits, such as employment growth, to be had from hosting these costly games. This paper examines the impacts of the Olympic Games on employment growth rates using a synthetic control approach. Results show transitory increases in employment growth rates following a county being awarded the Olympic Games in Fulton County, GA and Salt Lake County, UT. Results also indicate a decrease in employment growth rate in Los Angeles County, CA due to being awarded the 1984 Summer Olympic Games. Transitory increases in employment growth rates coupled with transitory decreases in the employment growth rate in Los Angeles County suggests that potential hosts should proceed with caution when considering hosting the Olympic Games. *West Virginia University, College of Business & Economics, 1601 University Ave., PO Box 6025, Morgantown, WV 26506-6025, USA; Email: [email protected] 1 1 Introduction Potential hosts fiercely compete to host the Olympic Games, the largest sporting event in the world, in part because of expected economic growth generated by hosting the mega-event. Hosting the Olympic Games costs billions of dollars, a portion of which taxpayers subsidize. -
Request to Waive Filing Deadline for Construction Permit Application
REQUEST TO WAIVE FILING DEADLINE FOR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION Brigham Young University (“BYU”), licensee of non-commercial educational television station KBYU-TV, Provo, Utah (the “Station”), has determined it is unable to construct the post- Incentive Auction facilities assigned to the Station in the Closing and Reassignment PN.1 Accordingly, the Station hereby requests a waiver of the initial construction permit application deadline for reassigned stations so that the Station — in coordination with the seven other television stations co-located with the Station (together, the “Utah Stations”) — may apply for alternate facilities in the first priority window.2 Each of the Utah Stations that is being repacked concurrently is filing a parallel waiver request. In addition, the Station and each other repacked Utah Station concurrently is filing a request to modify the Utah Stations’ transition schedule to allow the Utah Stations to begin the testing of their post-Auction channels earlier than is contemplated in the Commission’s current Phase 1 schedule, on a rolling basis. Grant of these waivers will serve the public interest by allowing the Utah Stations to efficiently construct post-Auction facilities while maintaining service to their communities. Moreover, the waivers requested in this filing and the parallel filings by other Utah Stations, and the alternate facilities for which the Utah Stations intend to apply, will not impede or delay any other station’s post-Auction transition or cause additional interference to any station. -
Going for the Gold: the Economics of the Olympics
Going for the Gold: The Economics of the Olympics By Robert Baade and Victor Matheson February 2016 COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS FACULTY RESEARCH SERIES, PAPER NO. 16-05* Department of Economics and Accounting College of the Holy Cross Box 45A Worcester, Massachusetts 01610 (508) 793-3362 (phone) (508) 793-3708 (fax) http://www.holycross.edu/departments/economics/website *All papers in the Holy Cross Working Paper Series should be considered draft versions subject to future revision. Comments and suggestions are welcome. Going for the Gold: The Economics of the Olympics By Robert Baade† College of the Holy Cross and Victor Matheson†† College of the Holy Cross February 2016 Abstract In this paper, we explore the costs and benefits of hosting the Olympic Games. On the cost side, there are three major categories: general infrastructure such as transportation and housing to accommodate athletes and fans; specific sports infrastructure required for competition venues; and operational costs, including general administration as well as the opening and closing ceremony and security. Three major categories of benefits also exist: the short-run benefits of tourist spending during the Games; the long-run benefits or the "Olympic legacy" which might include improvements in infrastructure and increased trade, foreign investment, or tourism after the Games; and intangible benefits such as the "feel-good effect" or civic pride. Each of these costs and benefits will be addressed in turn, but the overwhelming conclusion is that in most cases the Olympics are a money-losing proposition for host cities; they result in positive net benefits only under very specific and unusual circumstances. -
A Taste of NAB 2004 As of September 10, 2004 48 Venues Total and 124 E-Mail Received to Date
Comments received from attendees of the Road Show A Taste of NAB 2004 As of September 10, 2004 48 venues total and 124 E-mail received to date. (the latest have been added to the end of this list) All are presented as sent and are unedited (except as noted) All e-mail addresses are links From: "David Joseph" [email protected] To: <[email protected]> Subject: [BC] The Road Show - A Taste of NAB Date: Friday, April 30, 2004 8:01 AM Larry, Just a note to say thanks once again for bringing some of NAB to the SBE chapter 40 lunch last Wednesday. Although I was able to go to NAB, you not only do a great service to those who couldn't go, but I found some products I missed and even two that one of my contract jobs employer will be interested in. Keep up the great work Larry; look forward to next year's presentation. Regards, Dave Joseph, CBRE W7AMX ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2. From: "Joe P." [email protected] To: <[email protected]> Subject: Joe from Phoenix Date: Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:35 PM Hi Larry: Joe Pietrzyk here from Phoenix. Thanks for the great road show that you had put on this year. It was better than ever, and enjoyed the MCing that you did. I guess I won 500 feet of wire from Clark. How do I proceed to get it. What are the limits as to what I can request? I'm sure they would not give out 500 feet of 6 inch heliax!! Thank You.. -
Microvolt Please Send Dues To: Send To: U.A.R.C
The Antenna Farm on Farnsworth Peak Volume XLIV Issue 4, April 2000 The Periodicals Postage Paid MICROVOLT PLEASE SEND DUES TO: SEND TO: U.A.R.C. c/o Gregg Smith 7546 S. Uranium Dr. West Jordan, UT 84084 THE MICROVOLT (USPS 075-430) is published monthly except August for $15.00 per year or $1.50 per issue by the Utah Amateur Radio Club, 3666 South State St. Salt Lake City, UT., 84115-4848.. Periodicals Postage Paid at Salt Lake City UT. POSTMASTER: Send address change to “ The Microvolt”, c/o Gregg Smith, 7546 Uranium Dr., West Jordan, UT 84084. 2 Prologue UARC 2000 Board The Utah Amateur Radio Club was organized under its present President: Maurine Strektenfinger, K7HOZ 254-1536 Exec VP: Alan Seyboldt, N7OI 572-8112 name in 1927, although its beginnings may date back as early as Vice Pres: Gordon Smith, K7HFV 582-2438 1909. In 1928, it became affiliated with the American Radio Secretary: Gregg Smith, KD7APW 255-0344 Relay League (club #1602) and is a non-profit organization Treasurer: Chuck Johnson, WA7JOS 268-0153 under the laws of Utah. It holds a club station license with the Microvolt Editor: Manford Gooch, AB7PM 272-7380 call W7SP, a memorial call for Leonard (Zim) Zimmerman, an Asst. Microvolt Editor: Bruce Leonard, KJ7HZ 576-9162 amateur radio pioneer in the Salt Lake City Area. Program Chair: Dick Abbott, K7MZ 943-0370 Program Chair:Darryl Hazelgren, AF7O 942-3817 Meetings: The club meets each month except July and August. Imm. Past Pres: Gary Openshaw, KC7AWU 484-3407 The meetings are held on the first Thursday of the month at 7:30 PM in the Bonneville Medical Building located at 1255 East Committee Chairpersons and Members 3900 South in Holladay, across the street from St. -
The University of Utah Campus Master Plan
THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN 3. Discovery CHAPTER 3: DISCOVERY & ANALYSIS Introduction During the Discovery and Analysis phase of this pro- cess the University’s current physical campus structure, buildings, infrastructure systems, transportation and transit use, housing needs and academic space assess- ment were examined. It was the goal of this phase of the work to gain as much understanding regarding the campus’ existing conditions and operations as possible in order to glean the major planning issues that needed to be addressed in a comprehensive campus master plan. The documentation of the analysis phase of discovery is presented in one of three sections of this overall document. The analysis that can simply be reported and those recommendations that can be outlined in a summary fashion for further implementation strategies that will be discussed later in the book. The analysis is presented in this chapter. When the analysis and information gathering defines a very specific problem or issue that has been addressed by the Plan, this document presents that analysis and observational material in the “Plan Elements” or “Transformative Projects” chapters. This chapter orga- nization allows these issues and recommendation to be more closely tied. This decision also serves to minimize redundant information, which in a campus planning project of this size and complexity, would only serve to frustrate the reader. 3 – 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CAMPUS MASTER PLAN The University of Utah 2008 (view east) 3 – 3 CHAPTER 3: DISCOVERY & ANALYSIS Campus Setting Wasatch Mountain Range Regional Context The product of 20 million years of The 1500-acre University of Utah campus is dramatical- The eastern and northern portions of the City are locat- geologic faulting, volcanic activity, and ly located at the foothills of a mountain valley with the ed on a series of terraces, or former beaches, which are glaciation, the Wasatch Mountains, the Wasatch Mountains to the east and north. -
On the Financial Advantage of Hosting the Olympics
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 1; January 2013 On the Financial Advantage of Hosting the Olympics Ben Levy Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 United States of America Paul D. Berger Bentley University Waltham, MA 02452 United States of America Abstract Mega Sporting Events generally are classified as the Olympics, World Cup, and UEFA (Union of European Football Associations) Championship in Europe. Since the significant positive economic impact of $2.3 billion realized by Los Angeles after the 1984 Summer Olympic Games, the number of bids by cities for these mega sporting events has increased significantly. Also, this success inspired economic evaluations of the Olympic Games to be conducted to better estimate the financial benefit to the host city. Utilizing improved methodologies, as well as superior data, models have found that, in reality, it is more difficult than anticipated to realize an economic benefit from hosting the Olympic Games. We conduct statistical analyses on the financial data for several of the Olympic cities since 1990. We also discuss data available from the British government which estimates the economic outcome of the 2012 Summer Olympic Games in London. Introduction The modern Olympic Games began in 1896 in Athens, Greece, a reincarnation of an ancient Greek tradition that ran from 776 BC to 393 AD. In 1896 there were just 254 competitors from 14 countries. The London 2012 Summer Olympics are projected to have 204 nations and 26 sports. In 1984, Los Angeles held the summer Olympics and realized a significant economic gain of $2.3 billion (unless otherwise noted, all dollar figures are U.S. -
Trail Development in the Lake Mountains, North Oquirrh
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management April 2021 Trail Development in the Lake Mountains, North Oquirrh Management Area and Rose and Yellow Fork Canyons DOI-BLM-UT-W010-2020-0007-EA Environmental Assessment Cost Estimate $ 9,960.00 Salt Lake Field Office 2370 South Decker Lake Boulevard West Valley City, Utah 84119 Phone: (801) 977-4300 Fax: (801) 977i -4397 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Purpose & Need ............................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Decision to be Made ...................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Conformance with BLM Land Use Plan(s) .......................................................................... 6 1.4 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, or Other Plans .......................................................... 7 1.5 Identification of Issues ........................................................................................................ 10 1.5.1 Issues Analyzed in Detail ............................................................................................. 11 1.5.2 Issues Not Analyzed in Detail..................................................................................... -
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING GROUP, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
Nexstar Broadcasting Group Stations Market Rank Market Station Major Affiliation Status (1) 8 Washington, DC/Hagerstown, MD (2) WHAG NBC O&O 33 Salt Lake City, UT KTVX/KUCW ABC O&O 43 Harrisburg-Lancaster-Lebanon-York, PA WLYH The CW O&O 49 Memphis, TN WPTY/WLMT ABC O&O 50 Jacksonville, FL WCWJ The CW O&O 54 Wilkes Barre-Scranton, PA WBRE NBC O&O WYOU CBS LSA 55 Fresno-Visalia, CA KGPE (3) CBS O&O KSEE (3) NBC LSA 56 Little Rock-Pine Bluff, AR KARK/KARZ NBC O&O KLRT/KASN (3) FOX LSA 69 Green Bay-Appleton, WI WFRV CBS O&O 74 Springfield, MO KOLR CBS LSA KOZL Independent O&O 78 Rochester, NY WROC CBS O&O WUHF FOX LSA 82 Shreveport, LA KTAL NBC O&O 83 Champaign-Springfield- Decatur, IL WCIA/WCIX CBS O&O 84 Syracuse, NY WSYR ABC O&O 97 Burlington-Plattsburgh, VT WFFF (3) FOX O&O WVNY (3) ABC LSA 101 Ft. Smith-Fayetteville- Springdale-Rogers, AR KFTA/KNWA FOX/NBC O&O 102 Johnstown-Altoona, PA WTAJ CBS O&O 104 Evansville, IN WEHT ABC O&O WTVW The CW LSA 109 Ft. Wayne, IN WFFT FOX O&O 116 Peoria-Bloomington, IL WMBD CBS O&O WYZZ FOX LSA 126 Bakersfield, CA KGET/KKEY-LP (3) NBC O&O 130 Amarillo, TX KAMR NBC O&O KCIT/KCPN-LP FOX LSA 134 Rockford, IL WQRF FOX O&O WTVO ABC LSA 137 Monroe, LA- El Dorado, AR KARD FOX O&O KTVE NBC LSA 142 Wichita Falls, TX- Lawton, OK KFDX NBC O&O KJTL/KJBO-LP FOX LSA 143 Lubbock, TX KLBK CBS O&O KAMC ABC LSA 146 Erie, PA WJET ABC O&O WFXP FOX LSA 149 Joplin, MO-Pittsburg, KS KSNF NBC O&O KODE ABC LSA 151 Odessa-Midland, TX KMID ABC O&O 154 Terre Haute, IN WTWO NBC O&O WAWV ABC LSA 157 Binghamton, NY WBGH/WIVT NBC/ABC O&O 164 Abilene-Sweetwater, TX KTAB CBS O&O KRBC NBC LSA 168 Billings, MT KSVI ABC O&O KHMT FOX LSA 169 Dothan, AL WDHN ABC O&O 172 Utica, NY WFXV/WPNY-LP FOX O&O WUTR ABC LSA 174 Elmira, NY WETM NBC O&O 176 Jackson, TN WJKT FOX O&O 177 Watertown, NY WWTI ABC O&O 180 Marquette, MI WJMN CBS O&O 197 San Angelo, TX KSAN NBC LSA KLST CBS O&O 200 St. -
GAO-02-140 Olympic Games Contents
United States General Accounting Office Report to the Ranking Minority Member GAO Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch Committee on Appropriations U.S. Senate November 2001 OLYMPIC GAMES Costs to Plan and Stage the Games in the United States a GAO-02-140 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 4 Background 6 About $363 Million Spent to Plan and Stage the 1980 Winter Olympic Games in Lake Placid 6 Excluding Additional Security Requirements Brought About by the September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attacks, Planning and Staging Costs for the 2002 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games Are Estimated at $1.9 Billion 9 Total Direct Cost and Government Funding and Support for Planning and Staging the 1984 Summer Olympic Games in Los Angeles 12 Total Direct Cost and Government Funding and Support for Planning and Staging the1996 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games in Atlanta, GA 15 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 17 Appendixes Appendix I: Objectives, Scope, and Methodology 20 Appendix II: Direct Federal Funding and Support for Planning and Staging the 1980 Winter Olympic Games in Lake Placid, NY 24 Appendix III: Direct Federal Funding and Support for the Planned 2002 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games at Salt Lake City, UT 28 Appendix IV: Direct Federal Funding and Support for Planning and Staging the 1984 Summer Olympic Games in Los Angeles, CA 42 Appendix V: Direct Federal Funding and Support for Planning and Staging the 1996 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games 46 Appendix VI: Comments From the Salt Lake Organizing Committee 54 Figures Figure 1: Total