Rust Resistance in the Guatemalan Climbing Bean Germplasm Collection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rust Resistance in the Guatemalan Climbing Bean Germplasm Collection RUST RESISTANCE IN THE GUATEMALAN CLIMBING BEAN GERMPLASM COLLECTION A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Luz de Maria Albertina Montejo Domínguez In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major Department: Plant Sciences July 2017 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title RUST RESISTANCE IN THE GUATEMALAN CLIMBING BEAN GERMPLASM COLLECTION By Luz de Maria Albertina Montejo Domínguez The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Ph.D. Juan M. Osorno Chair Ph.D. Phillip McClean Ph.D. Samuel Markell Ph.D. Elias Elias Approved: August 2, 2017 Ph.D. Richard Horsley Date Department Chair ABSTRACT Common bean is the main source of protein, fiber, and iron for Guatemalan's poorest households; however, bean rust can cause up to 100% yield losses. There is limited information about bean rust in Guatemala, especially at mid-altitude highlands. During 2015, 23 bean rust samples were collected in the Western Guatemalan Highlands and 17 isolates where characterized, as a result, races 63-1 and 31-1 were identified. Those were used to evaluate rust resistance by using 372 Guatemalan climbing beans. In total, 82% of accessions were resistant to race 63-1, 86% to race 31-1, and 90% to race 20-3. Based on GWAS results (78,754 SNPs) the Pv02 (38.13 Mb-38.22Mb) and Pv04 (379 kb) regions were associated with resistance to race 20- 3. The Pv10 (10.71-10.68 Mb and 11.09 Mb) and Pv04 (1.42 MB) regions control resistance to race 63-1. And, the Pv04 (39.28 Mb) and Pv02 (35.92 Mb) control resistance to race 31-1. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Juan M. Osorno for his guidance, opportunities and support during my career. I would also like to express my gratitude to my committee members: Dr. Elias, Dr. McClean and Dr. Markell for their help. I would like to give special thanks to Dr. Steadman from Plant Pathology Department at University of Nebraska, Lincoln for his support in my whole research. I will not forget the kindness and help from the staff of the Dry Bean Breeding Program at NDSU, Jody VanderWal, Mike Klobendanz, Stephan Schroder, Ali Soltani, Katelynn Walker, Carlos Maldonado, and Federico Velasquez as well as Gabriela Tobar from the bean molecular genetics group. In addition, I would like to thank Serena McCoy and Becky Higgins from the Plant Pathology Department at UNL, Nebraska, for their support and warmness. I have great appreciation for The USAID Legume Innovation Lab project, ICTA - Guatemala and the Department of Plant Sciences at North Dakota State University. Without their support, this opportunity would not have been available. Most importantly, to all my family members for their support, cheers and encouraging me to pursuit my goals. Finally, thanks to all my friends who supported me during this journey. iv DEDICATION To my parents Luz Dominguez and Benjamin Montejo v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iv DEDICATION ................................................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF APPENDIX TABLES ..................................................................................................... x LIST OF APPENDIX FIGURES................................................................................................... xi INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................... 5 The Importance of Common Bean .............................................................................................. 5 Relevance of Climbing Beans in Latin America ......................................................................... 8 Bean Rust: A Biotic Constrain .................................................................................................. 11 Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) in Common Bean ................................................. 18 MATERIALS AND METHODS .................................................................................................. 21 Rust Collection in Guatemala ................................................................................................... 21 Pathogen Characterization ......................................................................................................... 22 Germplasm Greenhouse Evaluation .......................................................................................... 25 Genome Wide Association Analysis ......................................................................................... 28 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Pathogen Characterization ......................................................................................................... 31 Germplasm Greenhouse Evaluation .......................................................................................... 34 Genome –Wide Association Studies ......................................................................................... 35 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................... 41 Pathogen Characterization ......................................................................................................... 41 vi Germplasm Greenhouse Evaluation .......................................................................................... 42 Genome–Wide Association Studies .......................................................................................... 44 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 50 APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................... 56 vii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Common bean differential cultivars set used to characterize isolates of U. appendiculatus. ................................................................................................................. 14 2. Description of infection types of U. appendiculatus isolates on 1-6, based on pustule diameter. ............................................................................................................... 14 3. Samples of U. appendiculatus in beans collected at Western highlands of Guatemala ......................................................................................................................... 22 4. Quantitative scores for 1 to 6 infection types to U. appendiculatus. ................................ 28 5. Infection types for the standard set of 12 differential bean cultivars to U. appendiculatus isolates collected from Guatemala, and races based on the binary system at the seedling stage .............................................................................................. 32 6. Virulence phenotype of bean rust races 63-1, 31-1 and 20-3* to P. vulgaris differential cultivars for rust resistance............................................................................. 33 7. Analysis of Variance with fixed effects for rust diseases reactions in 372 climbing bean accessions. ................................................................................................................ 35 8. Percentage of resistant and susceptible genotypes by race, maximum and minimum infection type scores. ........................................................................................ 35 9. Mean Square Deviation (MSD) of each GWAS Statistical Model with Continuous and Binary Data. ............................................................................................................... 36 10. SNPs markers (0.01%) significantly associated with rust resistance to race 20-3 on the Guatemalan climbing bean collection, sorted by the lowest P-value. ................... 37 11. SNPs markers (0.01%) significantly associated with rust resistance to race 63-1 on the Guatemalan climbing bean collection, sorted by the lowest P-value. ................... 38 12. SNPs markers (0.01%) significantly associated with rust resistance to race 31-1 on the Guatemalan climbing bean collection, sorted by the lowest P-value. ................... 40 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Bean rust life cycle............................................................................................................ 13 2. Inoculation of pinto UI-114 with bean rust spore samples collected from Guatemala, for spores increasing. ....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Neotropical Entomology and Phytopathology - A
    TROPICAL BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT – Vol. VI - Introduction to Neotropical Entomology and Phytopathology - A. Bonet and G. Carrión INTRODUCTION TO NEOTROPICAL ENTOMOLOGY AND PHYTOPATHOLOGY A. Bonet Department of Entomology, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Mexico G. Carrión Department of Biodiversity and Systematic, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Mexico Keywords: Biodiversity loss, biological control, evolution, hotspot regions, insect biodiversity, insect pests, multitrophic interactions, parasite-host relationship, pathogens, pollination, rust fungi Contents 1. Introduction 2. History 2.1. Phytopathology 2.1.1. Evolution of the Parasite-Host Relationship 2.1.2. The Evolution of Phytopathogenic Fungi and Their Host Plants 2.1.3. Flor’s Gene-For-Gene Theory 2.1.4. Pathogenetic Mechanisms in Plant Parasitic Fungi and Hyperparasites 2.2. Entomology 2.2.1. Entomology in Asia and the Middle East 2.2.2. Entomology in Ancient Greece and Rome 2.2.3. New World Prehispanic Cultures 3. Insect evolution 4. Biodiversity 4.1. Biodiversity Loss and Insect Conservation 5. Ecosystem services and the use of biodiversity 5.1. Pollination in Tropical Ecosystems 5.2. Biological Control of Fungi and Insects 6. The future of Entomology and phytopathology 7. Entomology and phytopathology section’s content 8. ConclusionUNESCO – EOLSS Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical SketchesSAMPLE CHAPTERS Summary Insects are among the most abundant and diverse organisms in terrestrial ecosystems, making up more than half of the earth’s biodiversity. To date, 1.5 million species of organisms have been recorded, although around 85% of potential species (some 10 million) have not yet been identified. In the case of the Neotropics, although insects are clearly a vital element, there are many families of organisms and regions that are yet to be well researched.
    [Show full text]
  • Review on Infection Biology of Uromyces Species and Other Rust Spores Sharad Shroff, Dewprakash Patel and Jayant Sahu Banaras Hindu University Varanasi-221005(India)
    1837 Sharad Shroff et al./ Elixir Agriculture 30 (2011) 1837-1842 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Agriculture Elixir Agriculture 30 (2011) 1837-1842 Review on infection biology of uromyces species and other rust spores Sharad Shroff, Dewprakash Patel and Jayant Sahu Banaras Hindu University Varanasi-221005(India). ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Uromyces fabae (Uromyces viciae-fabae) the pea rust was first reported by D. C. H. Persoon in Received: 8 January 2011; 1801. Later DeBary (1862) changed the genus and renamed it as Uromyces fabae (Pers) Received in revised form: deBary. There after, Kispatic (1949) described f. sp. viciae -fabae by including host vicia fabae. 26 January 2011 The pathogen Uromyces fabae described as autoecious rust with aeciospores, urediospores and Accepted: 29 January 2011 teliospores found on the surface of host plant (Arthur and Cummins, 1962; Gaumann, 1998). Gaumann proposed that the fungus be classified into nine forma speciales each with a host Keywords range limited to two or there species. Later it was observed that the isolates of Uromyces penetration hypha, viciae-fabae share so many hosts in common that it was impossible to classify them into Host surface penetration, forma speciales (Conner and Bernier, 1982). Based on the distinctive shape and dimensions of Aecium cup, substomatal vesicle, Uromyces viciae fabae has been described as a species complex (Emeran Peridium layer. et al., 2005). It revealed that host specialized isolates of Uromyces viciae fabae were morphologically distinct, differing in both spore dimensions and infection structure. © 2011 Elixir All rights reserved. Introduction Variability in the pathogen Uppal (1933) and Prasada and Verma (1948) found that Pathogenic variability has been reported in field collection several species of Vicia, Lathyrus, Pisum , and Lentil are of Uromyces fabae (Singh and Sokhi, 1980; Conner and Bernier, susceptible to Uromyces fabae in India and abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis
    Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology Uppsala 2011 Taxonomic and phylogenetic study of rust fungi forming aecia on Berberis spp. in Sweden Iuliia Kyiashchenko Master‟ thesis, 30 hec Ecology Master‟s programme SLU, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology Iuliia Kyiashchenko Taxonomic and phylogenetic study of rust fungi forming aecia on Berberis spp. in Sweden Uppsala 2011 Supervisors: Prof. Jonathan Yuen, Dept. of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology Anna Berlin, Dept. of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology Examiner: Anders Dahlberg, Dept. of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology Credits: 30 hp Level: E Subject: Biology Course title: Independent project in Biology Course code: EX0565 Online publication: http://stud.epsilon.slu.se Key words: rust fungi, aecia, aeciospores, morphology, barberry, DNA sequence analysis, phylogenetic analysis Front-page picture: Barberry bush infected by Puccinia spp., outside Trosa, Sweden. Photo: Anna Berlin 2 3 Content 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………. 6 1.1 Life cycle…………………………………………………………………………….. 7 1.2 Hyphae and haustoria………………………………………………………………... 9 1.3 Rust taxonomy……………………………………………………………………….. 10 1.3.1 Formae specialis………………………………………………………………. 10 1.4 Economic importance………………………………………………………………... 10 2 Materials and methods……………………………………………………………... 13 2.1 Rust and barberry
    [Show full text]
  • Gljive Iz Reda Pucciniales – Morfologija, Sistematika, Ekologija I Patogenost
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Croatian Digital Thesis Repository SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU PRIRODOSLOVNO – MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET BIOLOŠKI ODSJEK Gljive iz reda Pucciniales – morfologija, sistematika, ekologija i patogenost Fungi from order Pucciniales – morphology, systematics, ecology and pathogenicity SEMINARSKI RAD Jelena Radman Preddiplomski studij biologije Mentor: Prof. dr. sc. Tihomir Miličević SADRŽAJ 1. UVOD............................................................................................................................................... 2 2. SISTEMATIKA ................................................................................................................................... 3 3. MORFOLOGIJA................................................................................................................................. 5 3.1. GRAĐA FRUKTIFIKACIJSKIH TIJELA I SPORE ............................................................................. 5 3.1.1. Spermatogoniji (piknidiji) sa spermacijama (piknidiosporama) ................................... 5 3.1.2. Ecidiosorusi (ecidiji) s ecidiosporama ............................................................................ 6 3.1.3. Uredosorusi (urediji) s uredosporama ........................................................................... 7 3.1.4. Teliosorusi (teliji) s teliosporama................................................................................... 7 3.1.5. Bazidiji i bazidiospore....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 15AWC Book 0.Indb
    Fifteenth Australian Weeds Conference Broom rust in Australia Louise Morin1,2, Jean-Louis Sagliocco3, Diana Hartley2, John R. Hosking1,4, Phil Cramond5 and Bill Washington6 1 CRC for Australian Weed Management 2 CSIRO Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia 3 Primary Industries Research Victoria, Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 48, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia 4 Department of Primary Industries, 4 Marsden Park Road, Calala, New South Wales 2340, Australia 5 Natural Resources Management Board, 1 Adelaide Lobethal Road, Lobethal, South Australia 5241, Australia 6 Biosecurity Victoria, Department of Primary Industries, Private Bag 15 Ferntree Gully Delivery Centre, Victoria 3156, Australia Summary In May 2003, a rust fungus, now tenta- infestations are in the west coast region where about tively referred to as Uromyces pisi-sativi, was found 33,000 ha is infested (Hosking et al. 1998). Scotch for the first time in Australia on Scotch broom (Cytisus broom is common in the Mount Lofty Ranges of SA, scoparius) plants at four sites in Canberra, ACT. The with nearly 4000 ha invaded (Hosking et al. 1998). rust was subsequently detected in January 2005 in a Since the early 1990s, Scotch broom has been a broom sample collected in the Cleland Conservation target for biological control in Australia. The broom Park area, Mount Lofty in SA. Surveys in that region twig-mining moth, Leucoptera spartifoliella Hübner and at Barrington Tops in NSW confirmed the pres- was released in 1993, the broom psyllid, Arytainilla ence of this rust over a broader range than originally spartiophila (Förster) in 1994 and the broom seed pod thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Ray G. Woods, R. Nigel Stringer, Debbie A. Evans and Arthur O. Chater
    Ray G. Woods, R. Nigel Stringer, Debbie A. Evans and Arthur O. Chater Summary The rust fungi are a group of specialised plant pathogens. Conserving them seems to fly in the face of reason. Yet as our population grows and food supplies become more precarious, controlling pathogens of crop plants becomes more imperative. Breeding resistance genes into such plants has proved to be the most cost effective solution. Such resistance genes evolve only in plants challenged by pathogens. We hope this report will assist in prioritising the conservation of natural ecosystems and traditional agro-ecosystems that are likely to be the richest sources of resistance genes. Despite its small size (11% of mainland Britain) Wales has supported 225 rust fungi taxa (including 199 species) representing 78% of the total British mainland rust species. For the first time using widely accepted international criteria and data collected from a number of mycologists and institutions, a Welsh regional threat status is offered for all native Welsh rust taxa. The results are compared with other published Red Lists for Wales. Information is also supplied in the form of a census catalogue, detailing the rust taxa recorded from each of the 13 Welsh vice-counties. Of the 225 rust taxa so far recorded from Wales 7 are probably extinct (3% of the total), and 39 (18%) are threatened with extinction. Of this latter total 13 taxa (6%) are considered to be Critically Endangered, 15 (7%) to be Endangered and 13 (6%) to be Vulnerable. A further 20 taxa (9%) are Near Threatened, whilst 15 taxa (7%) lacked sufficient data to permit evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • How Understand Cryptogams? the Development of Research Methods and Their Impact on the Knowledge of Cryptogams
    How understand cryptogams? The development of research methods and their impact on the knowledge of cryptogams A tribute to Josef POELT Franz OBERWINKLER*1 Abstract: This article intends to shed light on increasing knowledge of cryptogam biology over 400 years of research. The progress in biological disciplines involved, is tightly bound to new research methods. Starting with recognizing algae, mosses, ferns, and fungi in the field, collecting and identifying them was a consequence. It required classifi- cations for handling the rapidly growing number of species. Soon, it became apparent that lightmicrocopy was an indispensable method of all kinds of cryptogam studies, especially for elucidating their cellular constructions, an essential basis for studying their functions. Electron microscopy broke down the limitations of magnification and resolution in light microscopy. The detection and understanding of subcellular structures revolutionized bio- logy as such, and that of cryptogams in particular. Now, physiological studies with chemi- cal and physicochemical methods of earlier days could be coupled more and more with structural characters of cell organelles. Increasing knowledge on metabolisms and appli- cable products strengthened efforts in biotechnology and led to new industrial disciplines. Surprisingly, sequencing techniques of nucleic acids were essentially developed in biolo- gy and not in chemistry. Their rapidly spreading application to all kinds of organisms, in- cluding cryptogams, is unique and marks a most revolutionary period in biology. It covers now developmental, metabolic, ecological, and evolutionary studies, and dominates biolo- gical research to a very high percentage. The mass of data produced since then, increasing continously, requires bioinformatics as an additional discipline in biology.
    [Show full text]
  • New Species and Reports of Rust Fungi (Basidiomycota, Uredinales) of South America
    Mycol Progress (2007) 6:27–34 DOI 10.1007/s11557-006-0522-9 ORIGINAL ARTICLE New species and reports of rust fungi (Basidiomycota, Uredinales) of South America Reinhard Berndt & Anja Rössel & Francisco Freire Received: 12 July 2006 /Revised: 12 December 2006 /Accepted: 13 December 2006 / Published online: 30 January 2007 # German Mycological Society and Springer-Verlag 2007 Abstract Four new species of rust fungi (Basidiomycota, Introduction Uredinales) are proposed: Edythea soratensis on Berberis phyllacantha (Berberidaceae), Prospodium bicristatum on Rust specimens collected recently in Brazil and Peru and a Mansoa sp. (Bignoniaceae), Uromyces cearensis on Ipo- herbarium specimen originating from Bolivia were found to moea sp. (Convolvulaceae) and Uredo cavernula on Ribes represent species that are new to science. The present paper weberbaueri (Grossulariaceae). U. cavernula most proba- aims to contribute to the knowledge of the rust mycobiota bly belongs to the genus Goplana. Phakopsora phyllanthi of these countries by a detailed description and illustrations and Phakopsora vernoniae are newly reported for Brazil of the new species. and the New World. The uredinial stage of the latter is the same as Uredo toroiana, known so far from Hispaniola in the Caribbean. The parasitic mycelium of Esalque holwayi Materials and methods was studied. It is strictly intracellular but comprises well- defined haustoria and intracellular hyphae. Spores and hand sections of herbarium material were mounted in lactophenol and gently heated to boiling. The preparations were examined with C. Zeiss “Axioskop” or “Axiophot” light microscopes, and photographs were taken Taxonomical novelties with a C. Zeiss MC-80 camera on Kodak Ektachrome 64 Edythea soratensis Ritschel Professional slide film.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Pea and Lentil Rusts Uromyces Pisi, Uromyces Viciae-Fabae
    INDUSTRY BIOSECURITY PLAN FOR THE GRAINS INDUSTRY Threat Specific Contingency Plan Field pea and lentil rusts Uromyces pisi, Uromyces viciae-fabae Prepared by Kurt Lindbeck and Plant Health Australia March 2009 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Contingency Plan – Field pea & lentil rusts (Uromyces pisi & U. viciae-fabae) Disclaimer The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts were made to obtain relevant and published information on the pest. New information will be included as it becomes available, or when the document is reviewed. The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Further information For further information regarding this contingency plan, contact Plant Health Australia through the details below. Address: Suite 5, FECCA House 4 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6260 4322 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 Email: [email protected] Website: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au | PAGE 2 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Contingency Plan – Field pea & lentil rusts (Uromyces pisi & U. viciae-fabae) 1 Purpose of this Contingency Plan .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Outline of Plant Pathology
    AN OUTLINE OF PLANT PATHOLOGY Y. Chandra sekhar A. Prasad Babu R. Nagaraju AN OUTLINE OF PLANT PATHOLOGY Y. CHANDRA SEKHAR, M.Sc (Ag) Research Associate (Plant Pathology) Horticultural Research Station, Anantharajupeta Dr. Y.S.R. Horticultural University Andhra Pradesh Dr. ADARI PRASAD BABU R&D Head, Chief Ageonomist Lao Agro Green Organic Co. Ltd, Laos Dr.R. NAGARAJU Senior Scientist (Hort) & Head Horticultural Research Station, Anantharajupeta Dr. Y.S.R. Horticultural University Andhra Pradesh Published by: Mr.Gajendra Parmar for Parmar Publishers and Distributors 854, KG Ashram, Bhuinphod, Govindpur Road, Dhanbad-828109, Jharkhand Email: [email protected], [email protected] Ph: 9700860832, 9308398856 I First Edition – May, 2017 © Copyright with the Authors All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, photocopied or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher/authors. Note: Due care has been taken while editing and printing the book. In the event of any mistake crept in, or printing error happens, Publisher or Authors will not be held responsibility. In case of any binding error, misprints, or for missing pages etc., Publisher’s entire liability is replacement of the same edition of the book within one month of purchase of the book. Printed and bound in India ISBN: 978-93-84113-99-5 Published by: Mr.Gajendra Parmar for Parmar Publishers and Distributors 854, KG Ashram, Bhuinphod, Govindpur Road, Dhanbad-828109, Jharkhand Email: [email protected], [email protected] Ph: 9700860832, 9308398856 II PREFACE Plant Pathology, one of the prominent branches of Agricultural as wll as Horticultural has expanded by during the last three decades and assumed new dimension the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Persons' Index
    Persons’ Index Persons’ Index Page numbers in italics refer to images. A Cramer, Karl Eduard ............................106 Culberson, Chicita F. ..............................74 Abbe, Ernst .......................................... 111 Culberson, William L. ........................1, 74 Acharius, Erik .......................... 4, 104, 661 Albertini, Johann Baptista von .............105 Almborn, Ove ........................................ 17 D Amici, Giovanni Battista ..................... 661 Dahl, Eilif ............................................... 17 Ardenne, Manfred von .........................127 De Notaris, Giuseppe ...........................662 Arnold, Ferdinand ..............17, 66, 68, 109 Degelius, Gunnar ....................... 17, 42, 73 Awasthi, Dharani Dhar ...........................61 Delavay, Pierre Jean Marie .................. 621 Della Porta, Gianbattista ......................102 B Des Abbayes, Henry ............................... 17 Dickoré, W. Bernhard ............ 74, 619, 646 Bary, Anton de .......................4, 107ff, 130 Dillen, Johann Jacob ............................103 Bauhin, Caspar .....................................103 Döbbeler, Peter .................36, 51, 72ff, 109 Bauhin, Johann .....................................103 Doppelbaur, Hans .................... 21, 22, 518f Baumgärtner, Hilde .......................... 29, 30 Bébert, Antoine .................................... 131 Beschel, Roland ..................................... 71 E Braun, Wolfgang ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Polyphyly and Two Emerging Lineages in the Rust Genera Puccinia and Uromyces
    mycological research 111 (2007) 176–185 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres Polyphyly and two emerging lineages in the rust genera Puccinia and Uromyces Wolfgang MAIERa,*, Brenda D. WINGFIELDa, Mechthilde MENNICKENb, Michael J. WINGFIELDa aUniversity of Pretoria, Department of Genetics, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), Pretoria 0002, South Africa bDolziger Str. 48, 10247 Berlin, Germany article info abstract Article history: The phylogenetic validity of Puccinia and Uromyces, Pucciniaceae, and closely related genera Received 27 June 2006 was evaluated using nucLSU rDNA sequences. Using a wide range of rust species with dif- Received in revised form ferent life cycles and with different host specificities, Puccinia and Uromyces were shown to 6 October 2006 be highly polyphyletic and to also include representatives of the genera Aecidium, Cummin- Accepted 4 November 2006 siella, Dietelia, Endophyllum, Miyagia, and Uredo. Furthermore, the structure of the phyloge- Corresponding Editor: Gen Okada netic data did not reflect previous sub-generic delimitations based on teliospore pedicel structure, but rather suggests that at least two major lineages have evolved within Pucci- Keywords: nia/Uromyces: Rusts with telial states on Poaceae were exclusively found in one of these Basidiomycota groupings and those with telial states on Cyperaceae resided in the other lineage. This might Molecular phylogeny suggest that the two lineages evolved in close association with these host groups in differ- Pucciniaceae ent biomes. Pucciniales ª 2006 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Rust fungi Uredinales Introduction in Puccinia. This simplistic scheme is complicated by the fact, that there are species having both one- and two-celled telio- Puccinia and Uromyces are by far the two largest genera of rust spores and sometimes three- and four-celled spores.
    [Show full text]