Poles Apart – in Film As in Life

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Poles Apart – in Film As in Life Poles Apart – in film as in life Katyn, the most recent work of the great Polish filmmaker Andrzej Wajda and a finalist for the Best Foreign Language Oscar in 2008, was held over for nearly a month in its run at New York’s Film Forum, the city’s premiere art house. It depicts the Soviet murder of thousands of captive Polish army officers during the spring of 1940 and reverberations of the massacre’s aftermath several years later. This mass crime is so obscured amidst even larger crimes that soon eclipsed it, that even the film and its promotional material vary in the number of victims cited: 12,000, 15,000, or 22,000. Wajda was a protege of Aleksander Ford, a Polish Jew who headed Polish film productions in the immediate post-World War II period. Ford (who renamed himself in honor of the American film icon, John Ford) was obedient to the Communist regime’s propaganda needs – as he had to be, to make films at that time. It’s perhaps surprising that one of his efforts, Border Street, was strikingly “pro-Jewish” in its sympathetic depiction of the Jewish plight in the Warsaw Ghetto. It even focuses on the saintliness of a pious old Jew who perishes; but it also highlights the fighting spirit of younger Jews (including one child) who resist with weapons in hand. Border Street’s production values, including battle scenes and plot lines, are extremely poor, undoubtedly reflecting both a limited budget and political requirements. Jews were visibly prominent in the new Communist state. Film as a propaganda tool would have preached the need for Jews and non-Jews in Poland to work together to build a new progressive order; it would emphasize that they faced a common Nazi foe during the war. Antisemitism is explicitly reviled in Border Street, whether exhibited by Nazis or by ordinary Poles. Stalin, like Hitler (his ally from Sept. 1939 to June 1941), was a film buff who avidly screened films in private. Ford is reported to have been told in no uncertain terms by Stalin that Border Street was “too Jewish.” But it was not until 1968 that Ford was ousted from his job and from Poland during the anti-Jewish purge of that year. He lived in Israel, Denmark and the US afterwards, tried his hand at two films that were not successful, before taking his own life at a Florida hotel in 1980. By contrast, Wajda has had a long and illustrious career creating films of artistic note even during the Communist era. This particular film, Katyn, was somewhat disjointed. Post-war segments introduced characters who were hard to place in the story, at least for this non-Polish speaker, and somewhat undercut its power. What struck me as a Jewish film viewer is that there is nothing in Katyn, not even the dominant scenes of wartime and post-war Krakow, that indicates anything Jewish. By this I do not argue that there’s anything anti-Jewish in it. Wajda has worked on several films in which Jewish characters have figured positively. But this work reflects what was a fact in war-time Poland: that the struggles of Catholic Poles and of Jews were of a completely different order. They suffered separately (especially after most Jews were ghettoized), even to the extent that Warsaw was the site of two totally separate anti-Nazi uprisings – the revolt of the Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto in the spring of 1943, and the general Polish rebellion in the summer of 1944. Six million Polish citizens perished during World War II – three million Catholic Poles and three million Jews. The non-Jewish death toll was over ten percent of the population of Poland; the Jewish death toll was over 90 percent of Poland’s Jewish population..
Recommended publications
  • VULCAN HISTORICAL REVIEW Vol
    THE VULCAN HISTORICAL REVIEW Vol. 16 • 2012 The Vulcan Historical Review Volume 16 • 2012 ______________________________ Chi Omicron Chapter Phi Alpha Theta History Honor Society University of Alabama at Birmingham The Vulcan Historical Review Volume 16 • 2012 Published annually by the Chi Omicron Chapter of Phi Alpha Theta at the University of Alabama at Birmingham 2012 Editorial Staff Executive Editors Beth Hunter and Maya Orr Graphic Designer Jacqueline C. Boohaker Editorial Board Chelsea Baldini Charles Brooks Etheredge Brittany Richards Foust Faculty Advisor Dr. George O. Liber Co-Sponsors The Linney Family Endowment for The Vulcan Historical Review Dr. Carol Z. Garrison, President, UAB Dr. Linda Lucas, Provost, UAB Dr. Suzanne Austin, Vice Provost for Student and Faculty Success, UAB Dr. Bryan Noe, Dean of the Graduate School, UAB Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences, UAB Dr. Rebecca Ann Bach, Associate Dean for Research and Creative Activities in the Humanities and Arts, UAB Dr. Carolyn A. Conley, Chair, Department of History, UAB The Department of History, UAB The Vulcan Historical Review is published annually by the Chi Omicron Chapter (UAB) of Phi Alpha Theta History Honor Society. The journal is completely student-written and student-edited by undergraduate and masters level graduate students at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. ©2012 Chi Omicron Chapter of Phi Alpha Theta History Honor Society, the University of Alabama at Birmingham. All rights reserved. No material may be duplicated or quoted without the expressed written permission of the author. The University of Alabama at Birmingham, its departments, and its organizations disclaim any responsibility for statements, either in fact or opinion, made by contributors.
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Chopin? Politics and Patriotism in a Song to Remember (1945)
    Whose Chopin? Politics and Patriotism in A Song to Remember (1945) John C. Tibbetts Columbia Pictures launched with characteristic puffery its early 1945 release, A Song to Remember, a dramatized biography of nineteenth-century composer Frederic Chopin. "A Song to Remember is destined to rank with the greatest attractions since motion pictures began," boasted a publicity statement, "—seven years of never-ending effort to bring you a glorious new landmark in motion picture achievement."1 Variety subsequently enthused, "This dramatization of the life and times of Frederic Chopin, the Polish musician-patriot, is the most exciting presentation of an artist yet achieved on the screen."2 These accolades proved to be misleading, however. Viewers expecting a "life" of Chopin encountered a very different kind of film. Instead of an historical chronicle of Chopin's life, times, and music, A Song to Remember, to the dismay of several critics, reconstituted the story as a wartime resistance drama targeted more to World War II popular audiences at home and abroad than to enthusiasts of nineteenth-century music history.3 As such, the film belongs to a group of Hollywood wartime propaganda pictures mandated in 1942-1945 by the Office of War Information (OWI) and its Bureau of Motion Pictures (BMP)—and subject, like all films of the time, to the censorial constraints of the Production Code Administration (PCA)—to stress ideology and affirmation in the cause of democracy and to depict the global conflict as a "people's war." No longer was it satisfactory for Hollywood to interpret the war on the rudimentary level of a 0026-3079/2005/4601-115$2.50/0 American Studies, 46:1 (Spring 2005): 115-142 115 116 JohnC.Tibbetts Figure 1: Merle Oberon's "George Sand" made love to Cornel Wilde's "Frederic Chopin" in the 1945 Columbia release, A Song to Remember(couvtQsy Photofest).
    [Show full text]
  • Andrzej Wajda's a Generartion and Man of Marble
    Andrzej Wajda’s A Generartion and Man of Marble By Fabian Schuppert Spring 2006 Issue of KINEMA ANDRZEJ WAJDA’S A GENERATION AND MAN OF MARBLE FROM A POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE ’The cinema does not exist in a sublime state of innocence, untouched by the world; it also has a political content, whether conscious or unconscious, hidden or overt.’(1) Andrew Sarris A PIECE of art is always produced in concrete socio-political circumstances; it is a social product. Undoubt- edly art does not come into being or exists in an absolute, free state of self-sufficiency. But to postulate that art is at the same time always political, is quite a different affair. What exactly does it imply to saythat art, or as in the case of Andrew Sarris and this article, that film is political? This paper is going to inquire into the political role, function and use of film. The aim of this paper is to give a short overview on selected theories on the political nature of art and film, before moving on and applying these concepts to two films by Andrzej Wajda. This paper will analyse Wajda’s A Generation (Pokolenie, 1955) and Man of Marble (Człowiek z marmuru, 1976) from a political point of view. Both films were produced in Poland during the times of the communist regime, but under quite different conditions, and with quite different objectives. This article will not only deal with film analysis and interpretation but also critically look at the circumstance of production, which influenced the film: the concrete socio-political situation, including state pressure and censorship.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 When Politics Tipped the Scales: Locating Polish Documentary Films
    When Politics Tipped the Scales: Locating Polish Documentary Films from the 1940s Anna Misiak Falmouth University Abstract This article introduces the reader to the 1940s history of the documentary film in post-war Poland when the tense relationship between the Communist government and the small community of documentarians determined the contents of factual cinema. The author argues that the formal and thematic choices made by the 1940s filmmakers fuelled the future growth of the Polish School of Documentary. Despite of repressive censorship and close political scrutiny, the 1940s directors produced numerous subjective film visions of the social reality around them. Some worked in line with the political propaganda; others capitalised on the available margins of creative freedom; however small the latter might appear from today’s perspective. Not only do the discussed films testify to an unprecedented early proliferation of authorial creativity among Polish documentary filmmakers, but they also form social and political chronicles of their time, a potentially valuable material for the history of everyday life under Communism. As micro-historical film records, they can complement the conventional macro-historical approaches, which with only some exceptions, tend to dominate the Western studies of the world once hidden behind the Iron Curtain. This archive-based work aims at encouraging further research. The only copies of some of the examined titles are available at the National Film Archive in Warsaw. A few lesser known among them have not yet attracted international attention. Almost thirty years after the collapse of the Communist regime, it is the first time some of these films get a mention in the English language.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Space in Polish Communist Cinema
    Ewa Mazierska The Politics of Space in Polish Communist Cinema It is a commonplace that the communist cen- so important to Polish post-war cinema and cul- sors, especially during the Stalinist period, were ture at large, but also because his work perfectly preoccupied with the spoken word rather than lends itself to comparison with films from other images (see, for example, Zwierzchowski 2005: ex-socialist countries. In particular, the prob- 15–43). This meant that certain ideas unwel- lems and pathologies which he satirised in his come by the authorities were easier to transmit films concerned people in the whole ex-Soviet through visual means, including the represen- bloc and, to varying degrees, were present in the tation of space, than through dialogue or the cinemas of countries such as Czechoslovakia, construction of the narrative. This essay intends Hungary and the Soviet Union. to discuss this subversive ‘politics of space’, re- In contrast to Bareja, Krzysztof lated to different periods of Polish cinema. More Kieślowski’s ‘politics of space’ is relatively well precisely, I will refer to the politics of space in known and I have devoted part of my earlier three different senses: firstly, the official politics essays to the politics of space exemplified by of space in socialist Poland; secondly, the actual Marek Koterski (see Mazierska 2004). I will uses of space by Polish citizens; and thirdly, its refer to their work largely to illuminate the spe- cinematic representation. cificity of Bareja’s approach to ‘socialist space’ It would be impossible to analyse in one and his influence on younger film-makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Filming the End of the Holocaust War, Culture and Society
    Filming the End of the Holocaust War, Culture and Society Series Editor: Stephen McVeigh, Associate Professor, Swansea University, UK Editorial Board: Paul Preston LSE, UK Joanna Bourke Birkbeck, University of London, UK Debra Kelly University of Westminster, UK Patricia Rae Queen’s University, Ontario, Canada James J. Weingartner Southern Illimois University, USA (Emeritus) Kurt Piehler Florida State University, USA Ian Scott University of Manchester, UK War, Culture and Society is a multi- and interdisciplinary series which encourages the parallel and complementary military, historical and sociocultural investigation of 20th- and 21st-century war and conflict. Published: The British Imperial Army in the Middle East, James Kitchen (2014) The Testimonies of Indian Soldiers and the Two World Wars, Gajendra Singh (2014) South Africa’s “Border War,” Gary Baines (2014) Forthcoming: Cultural Responses to Occupation in Japan, Adam Broinowski (2015) 9/11 and the American Western, Stephen McVeigh (2015) Jewish Volunteers, the International Brigades and the Spanish Civil War, Gerben Zaagsma (2015) Military Law, the State, and Citizenship in the Modern Age, Gerard Oram (2015) The Japanese Comfort Women and Sexual Slavery During the China and Pacific Wars, Caroline Norma (2015) The Lost Cause of the Confederacy and American Civil War Memory, David J. Anderson (2015) Filming the End of the Holocaust Allied Documentaries, Nuremberg and the Liberation of the Concentration Camps John J. Michalczyk Bloomsbury Academic An Imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc LONDON • OXFORD • NEW YORK • NEW DELHI • SYDNEY Bloomsbury Academic An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2014 Paperback edition fi rst published 2016 © John J.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation for the US Holocaust Memorial Museum
    The Mother of all Holocaust Films? Wanda Jakubowska’s Auschwitz trilogy by Hanno Loewy “We must first speak about the genre of this wonderful Polish film.”1 With these words in 1948 Béla Balázs, one of the first and most influential film-theorists of all times, began his discussion of Wanda Jakubowska’s Ostatni Etap (The Last Stop / The Last Stage), the first feature film, that made the attempt to represent the horrors of Auschwitz, the experiences, made in midst of the universe of mass extermination. Filmed during summer 1947 on the site of the camp itself and its still existing structures, directed and written by two former prisoners of the women’s camp in Birkenau, performed not only by actors but also by extras, who had suffered in the camp themselves, Jakubowska’s film acquired soon the status of a document in itself. [illustration #1] Béla Balázs did not only praise The Last Stop for its dramatic merits. He discussed the failure, the inadequacies of traditional genres to embody what happened in the camps. Himself a romantic Communist, but also a self-conscious Jew, he spent half of his life in exile, in Vienna, Berlin and Moscow. And in the end of 1948 he was about to leave Hungary for a second time, now deliberately, to become dramaturgic advisor of the DEFA in East Berlin. But that never happened. Just having settled his contract, he died in Budapest, in May 1949. In 1948 Béla Balázs is far away from any conceptualizing of the Shoah as a paradigm, but he senses something uneasy about the idea of having represented these events as a classical tragedy, or a comedy, or a novel.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Scorsese Presents: Masterpieces of Polish Cinema Throughout North America
    INTRODUCTION In December 2011, filmmaker Martin Scorsese traveled to Poland to accept an honorary doctor- al degree from The Polish National Film, Television, and Theatre School in Łódź. There, Mr. Scors- ese met with Jędrzej Sabliński (a digital restoration expert, now with DI Factory), and reviewed a list of new digital restorations of Polish films. In the months following this visit, with the help of The Film Foundation, the two men came up with the idea of a North American tour of a series of restored Polish cinema classics. From an extensive catalogue of digitally restored films, Mr. Scorsese chose twenty-one masterpieces. The Film Foundation executive director, Margaret Bodde then worked with Mr. Sabliński to develop the program and recommended Milestone Films as the North American distributor for the series. Milestone will be touring the 21-film retrospective Martin Scorsese Presents: Masterpieces of Polish Cinema throughout North America. Premiering in New York City at the Film Society of Lincoln Center on February 5th, 2014, the series features films from some of Poland’s most accom- plished and lauded filmmakers, spanning the period from 1957–1987. Curated by Mr. Scorsese, each film has been digitally re-mastered and brilliantly restored on newly subtitled DCPs. The program was created and organized by Mr. Scorsese’s non-profit organization, The Film Foundation. 3 BIST, SIMPORE, TEMPORE, A STATEMENT FROM MARTIN SCORSESE Um volum, audae laccae seque natur, comnis ducienimus excest rendercillam laccupi endicit In 2011, I had the opportunity to visit the Polish National Film School in Łódź, Poland, at the atusda vitisitatur rentem vent.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Labor Bund's
    THE STARS BEAR WITNESS: THE JEWISH LABOR BUND 1897-2017 112020 cubs בונד ∞≥± — A 120TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION OF THE FOUNDING OF THE JEWISH LABOR BUND October 22, 2017 YIVO Institute for Jewish Research at the Center for Jewish History Sponsors YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, Jonathan Brent, Executive Director Workmen’s Circle, Ann Toback, Executive Director Media Sponsor Jewish Currents Executive Committee Irena Klepisz, Moishe Rosenfeld, Alex Weiser Ad Hoc Committee Rochelle Diogenes, Adi Diner, Francine Dunkel, Mimi Erlich Nelly Furman, Abe Goldwasser, Ettie Goldwasser, Deborah Grace Rosenstein Leo Greenbaum, Jack Jacobs, Rita Meed, Zalmen Mlotek Elliot Palevsky, Irene Kronhill Pletka, Fay Rosenfeld Gabriel Ross, Daniel Soyer, Vivian Kahan Weston Editors Irena Klepisz and Daniel Soyer Typography and Book Design Yankl Salant with invaluable sources and assistance from Cara Beckenstein, Hakan Blomqvist, Hinde Ena Burstin, Mimi Erlich, Gwen Fogel Nelly Furman, Bernard Flam, Jerry Glickson, Abe Goldwasser Ettie Goldwasser, Leo Greenbaum, Avi Hoffman, Jack Jacobs, Magdelana Micinski Ruth Mlotek, Freydi Mrocki, Eugene Orenstein, Eddy Portnoy, Moishe Rosenfeld George Rothe, Paula Sawicka, David Slucki, Alex Weiser, Vivian Kahan Weston Marvin Zuckerman, Michael Zylberman, Reyzl Zylberman and the following YIVO publications: The Story of the Jewish Labor Bund 1897-1997: A Centennial Exhibition Here and Now: The Vision of the Jewish Labor Bund in Interwar Poland Program Editor Finance Committee Nelly Furman Adi Diner and Abe Goldwasser
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Th e vibrant, multicultural mosaic of prewar Polish culture was destroyed during World War II. Poland lost more than six million inhabitants, almost 22 percent of the entire population. Th at number includes about three million Polish Jews, approximately 90 percent of Polish Jewry, who perished during the war in the ghettos and extermination camps built by Nazi Germany in occupied Polish territories.1 In a dispute with several historians who argued that Polish anti-Semitism and the indiff erence of Polish “bystanders” determined the fate of the Jewish population, Lucy S. Dawidowicz declares in her book, Th e Holocaust and the Historians, that “the Germans used Poland as their gigantic laboratory for mass murder, not (as has sometimes been wrongly charged) because the Nazis counted on Polish anti-Semitism, but because that was where most of Europe’s Jews were concentrated and where the Germans expected to settle for a long time.”2 James E. Young perceptively comments in a similar manner in his acclaimed book Th e Texture of Memory: “Th at the death camps were located on Polish soil suggests to the Poles not their national complicity, but their ultimate violation: it was one thing to be ravaged outside one’s land, another to be occupied and enslaved at home. In this view, the killing centers in Poland were to have begun with the Jews and ended with the Poles.”3 Today, there are probably no more than ten thousand Jews living in Poland, compared with 3.3 million before the war. Like other European countries, Poland was subsequently able to rebuild its economy and to redevelop its culture.
    [Show full text]
  • "Aryan Papers" : the Polish Connection
    Artur Piskorz "Aryan Papers" : The Polish Connection Media – Kultura – Komunikacja Społeczna 12/2, 73-79 2016 Aryan Papers: The Polish Connection 73 Artur Piskorz Wydział Filologiczny Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie Aryan Papers: The Polish Connection Słowa kluczowe: Stanley Kubrick, Aryjskie papiery, adaptacja, Polska, Lista Schindlera Key words: Stanley Kubrick, Aryan Papers, adaptation, Poland, Schindler’s List “I was born a few months after the burning of the Reichstag in T., a town of about forty thousand in a part of Poland that before the Great War had belonged to the Austro-Hungarian Empire.” This is the opening sentence of Louis Begley’s novel Wartime Lies – the book Stanley Kubrick wanted to turn into a movie.1 To what extent Kubrick’s biography influenced his work? His Jewish heritage, for instance, does not visibly translate itself into any aspect of the narrative or imagery in his films. Christiane Kubrick answers: “Like most Jewish families, Stanley’s family came from all over that part of the continent [Europe]. His mother came from Kiev, his father from Romania. But there were also relatives from Poland.”2 To be more precise – Kubrick’s grandfather, Elias, was born in Probużna, then a small rural town. Today it is a poverty-stricken village of barely two thousand inhabitants in the Ternopil District of Western Ukraine that was part of the historical region of Galicia. Is T., “a town of about forty thousand” from Begley’s book Ternopil? Is this Kubrick sending a sentimental post card to his forefathers? Is this the main source of the appeal? “He always wanted to make a film about or around the Holocaust, with- out ever succeeding” continues Christiane Kubrick.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleksander Ford's Border Street in Iluzjon
    Aleksander Ford’s Border Street in Iluzjon. „A movie about small people against the backdrop of a great era”. The Warsaw Ghetto Museum, in cooperation with the Social and Cultural Association of Jews in Poland and the National Film Archive – Audiovisual Institute and Iluzjon Cinema, invited the audience to a special screening of Aleksander Ford’s 1948 war drama, awarded with a Gold Medal at the Venice International Film Festival. The free screening was organised as part of the 76th anniversary of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. Border Street is the first post-war feature film of a multidimensional artists – avant-garde member of START association, who brought together independent, artistic, and engaged cinema (Legion of the Streets, People of the Vistula), adapted Marek Hłasko’s prose (The Eighth Day of the Week) and Leon Kruczkowski’s drama (The First Day of Freedom), and was the author of a gigantic, commercial success of Polish cinematography – Knights of the Teutonic Order, based on the novel by Henryk Sienkiewicz. Aleksander Ford, in cooperation with Ludwik Starski and Jan Fethke, wrote the screenplay of a story that depicts the war life of Jewish and Christian communities, and especially children, living in the same Warsaw tenement house at Border Street, which neighboured the ghetto during the occupation. The film depicts various human approaches in the face of German terror – from patriotism to collaboration, from solidarity to small-mindedness and villainy. The diverse characters were played by actors such as Mieczysława Ćwiklińska, Jerzy Pichelski, Tadeusz Fijewski, Maria Broniewska, Edward Dziewoński, and Ida Kamińska. The screening was preceded by an introduction by Dr Hanna Węgrzynek, Deputy Director for Research and Exhibition Programming, and it ended with an afterword by a film expert Anna Kilian (Warsaw Ghetto Museum) and Artur Hofman, Chairman of the Social and Cultural Association of Jews in Poland.
    [Show full text]